0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
12 vues10 pages
There is a very limited amount of literature describing the the impact of an adult cystic fibrosis (CF) pharmacist in an ambulatory setting. Although there are guidelines and standards of care for CF pharmacists in the UK and Europe, none exist in North America, and specifically in Canada.
Titre original
The Added Value of a Pharmacist in Identifying Drug-related Needs of Cystic Fibrosis Patients in a Large Adult Clinic
There is a very limited amount of literature describing the the impact of an adult cystic fibrosis (CF) pharmacist in an ambulatory setting. Although there are guidelines and standards of care for CF pharmacists in the UK and Europe, none exist in North America, and specifically in Canada.
There is a very limited amount of literature describing the the impact of an adult cystic fibrosis (CF) pharmacist in an ambulatory setting. Although there are guidelines and standards of care for CF pharmacists in the UK and Europe, none exist in North America, and specifically in Canada.
related needs of patients in an adult ambulatory cystic fibrosis clinic Sabrina Chan, Elizabeth Tullis, Daniel Cortes 2013 North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference October 17-19, 2013 2 Study Rationale Large body of literature evaluating pharmacists role in ambulatory clinics Examples of outcomes measured: Hospitalization rates Improvement in laboratory results e.g. blood pressure, warfarin monitoring Patient/clinician satisfaction with pharmacists interventions
The added value of a pharmacist in an adult CF ambulatory clinic has not been studied 3 Research objectives 1) To compare the number, types, and clinical significance of drug therapy problems (DTPs) identified by the pharmacist (RPh) and standard of care (SOC) in an adult ambulatory CF clinic
2) To quantify RPh recommendations and classify patient care services provided by RPh 4 Standard clinic visit vs. study visit Patient Nurse SOC: Respirologist or Nurse Practitioner Respiratory therapist Dietician Physiotherapist etc. Study Patient Nurse SOC Respiratory therapist Dietician Physiotherapist etc. RPh 5 Methods Documented: 1)DTP identified 2)DTP type 3)Self-rated DTP clinical significance: minor, moderate, major RPh/SOC discussion Patient Nurse SOC RPh 6 Drug Therapy Problem (DTP) Undesirable event experienced by a patient which involves or is suspected to involve drug therapy Types of DTPs: 1) Unnecessary drug therapy 2) Additional drug therapy required 3) Ineffective drug 4) Dose too low 5) Dose too high 6) Adverse drug reaction 7) Noncompliance / nonadherence
DTP Clinical Significance: Major DTPs requiring interventions that prevent detrimental effect Moderate DTPs requiring interventions leading to moderate benefit to patient Minor DTPs requiring interventions assumed to have little clinical importance for the patient
7 Examples of CF-related DTPs Drug-therapy problem (DTP) DTP Type Clinical significance Patient exhibiting signs and symptoms of a pulmonary exacerbation ! requires IV antibiotics Additional drug therapy required Major Patient takes tobramycin 160mg inhaled once daily instead of twice daily Nonadherence Moderate Patient experiencing mild constipation secondary to iron supplementation Adverse drug reaction Minor 8 Results Pharmacist recommendations: 57 (79% acceptance rate) N=20 Pharmacist Standard of Care DTPs identified / patient Total DTPs (p=0.002) 4.0 2.38 1.7 1.87 Excluding same DTPs identified by both groups (p=0.001) 3.05 1.9 0.75 1.5 DTP Types Additional drug required (31%) Adverse drug reactions (25%) Additional drug required (47%) Adverse drug reactions (24%) Clinical significance No significant association between clinical significance ratings and RPh/ SOC. 9 Discussion Different types of issues identified by both groups Distinct roles for pharmacist and SOC clinicians within the clinic High acceptance rate of pharmacists recommendations Generalizability of findings Limitations Small sample size Hawthorne effect Clinical significance classification had poor inter-rater reliability Disease outcomes (i.e. FEV1) not measured 10 Conclusions Pharmacists can add value to an adult ambulatory CF clinic by: identifying additional drug therapy problems collaborating with the clinic team providing expertise with drug-related clinical activities
Future direction: identify, prioritize who may benefit most from pharmacist assessment