Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 26

Guidelines

S.No TAB NAME Responsibility


1 Clientele Self and Manager Only
2 Self & Manager Appraisal Self and Manager Only
3 Peer Review Any 3 Peers of Management
choice; 1 Direct team member and
2 Different team members
4 HR Review HR Representative
5 Client Review Minimum 3 clients & Manager
6 Government Official Feedback Minimum 2 officials & Manager
7 Development Action Plan Self, Management & Manager
Performance Evaluation Form
Action
To fill the complete list of clients handeld and rating projects on
the basis of client feedback and completion time.
To rate as per the rating table and providing remarks
accordingly which would justify the ratings
Peer to rate on the basis of indicators set on page and rating
parameters.
Should provide feedback on the basis of Time and Attendance,
appreciation and complaints recieved recorded throughout the
year.
Manager to request for client feedback from 3 major clients of
employee directly involved during transition.
Manager to request for Govt. Official for providing feedback for
employee directly involved during transition.
Development plan and KRA for next cycle to be discussed with
Employee.
Performance Evaluation Form
1 Action not Closed
2 Action closed after timeline
3 Action closed on deadline
4 Action closed before deadline
5 Action well closed before timeline
S.No Client Name Cases Handled Start date
1
1
Project listing and status
FY - 2013 -2014
CASE DETAILS
Total
Rating Scale:
Scheduled close date Actual Closed Date Rating on project Remarks if any
01/01/2013
#DIV/0!
Project listing and status
FY - 2013 -2014
CASE DETAILS SELF
Rating on project Remarks if any
#DIV/0!
<<Back to Guidelines
Project listing and status
FY - 2013 -2014
Manager
1-2: Poor (unacceptable performance)
3-4: Fair (marginally acceptable performance)
5-6: Average (acceptable performance)
7-8: good (often exceeds acceptable performance)
9-10: excellent (truly superior performance)
1
CASE PERFORMANCE IN
THE YEAR
Cases Handled Vs Closed (Please fill the Clientele List with Cases) 20% 0
2 DRAFTING ABILITY:
Letters,briefs, contracts, pleadings and memorandas are consistently well written and
well thought out; is careful to avoid errors (typographical, factual or legal) in
documents he or she produces; the quality of the work consistently meets standards
ap-propriate to the firm; ability to highlight and summarise key points
10% 0
3 THOROUGHNESS:
Takes appropriate care to ensure that legal and factual issues relevant to the case are
properly explored. Is consistently well prepared for hearings, trials, depositions, etc. Is
diligent in documenting significant communications
10% 0
4 ADVOCACY SKILLS: is an effective advocate for clients positions in negotiations or at trials or in hearings 5% 0
5 PROJECT TIMELINES Consistently manages the projects within defined timelines 10% 0
6 RESEARCH
Performs legal research in a thorough, organized and competent manner; develop
initial theories, legally research issues inlight of facts, and develop case strategy
5% 0
7 CLIENT RELATIONS:
maintains good rapport with clients; Is responsive to client needs; quickly identify the
clients problem and advise them; clients speak highly of him; clients seek him for new
assignments; projects effort and commitment when working on client work
10% 0
8 JOB KNOWLEDGE:
Demonstartes adequate legal knowledge on assignments (Identify and analyse
problems; develop solutions, handling issues)to provide commercially and legally
accurate advice; reasoning and
judgment; aware of current developments
10% 0
9 TEAM COORDINATION
Co-ordination and communication with other team members, Project Manager, and
client representtaives; Positive, encourages others, motivate others
5% 0
10
ABILITY TO WORK
INDEPENDENTLY
Demonstrates the ability to handle complicated matters with minimal supervision; can
handle complex matters; Able to adapt to changing project needs, schedule, work
environment
5% 0
11 ATTENDANCE
Attendance and punctuality at work.
5% 0
PROJECT PARAMETERS
Domain Knowledge
Behavioural attributes
w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d

s
c
o
r
e
S
e
l
f

S
c
o
r
e
Rating Scale:
S
l
.

N
o
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

S
k
i
l
l
s
E
x
p
l
a
n
a
t
i
o
n
W
e
i
g
h
t
a
g
e
Deparment Assessment Year
Performance Review Form - Self & Manager
Employee Name Employee Id
Date of Joining Reproting Manager
Click Here
12
INITIATIVE AND
PARTICIPATION
Actively participates in projects and is proactive; does not wait to be told what to do;
routinely does more than is asked for; puts in the extra effort
5% 0
100%
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Name
Date and Place
Reporting Manager suggestions for Improvement (related to processes, issues its causes & recommendations, process improvement & reporting etc):
List the Key Challenges faced by you during the assessment year ( 2013-2014)
List the Key activities initiated and closed by you
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
M
a
n
a
g
e
r

S
c
o
r
e
R
e
m
a
r
k
s
PROJECT PARAMETERS
Domain Knowledge
Behavioural attributes
R
e
m
a
r
k
s
w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d

s
c
o
r
e
Assessment Year
Performance Review Form - Self & Manager
Employee Id
Reproting Manager
0
0 0
Reporting Manager suggestions for Improvement (related to processes, issues its causes & recommendations, process improvement & reporting etc):
List the Key Challenges faced by you during the assessment year ( 2013-2014)
List the Key activities initiated and closed by you
<<Back to Guidelines
1-2:
3-4:
5-6:
7-8:
9-10:
1 Team co-ordination
Co-ordination and communication with other team
members, Project Manager, and client representtaives
20% 9 1.8
2
Providing support and sharing
knowledge/ information
Cooperation and support in team; Support in terms of
closure of cases in right time and deilvered it .
20% 8 1.6
3 Domain and job knowledge
idea and hold on the subject matters as relevant to work of
th eindividual
20% 8 1.6
4 Attitude at work Takes initiative and involves wholeheartedly in work at hand 10% 7 0.7
5 Organisational values
Alignment and adherance to basic values and principles as
followed by the firm
10% 9 0.9
6 Overall Professionalism
demonstrates professional behaviour in presentation of self,
at work, with colleagues, clients etc
10% 8 0.8
7 Interpersonal Relations Positive, encourages others, motivates others 10% 7 0.7
100% 33 8.1
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
PEER Evaluation
List the Strenghts of Employee for whom your providing feedback
W
e
i
g
h
t
a
g
e
P
e
e
r

R
e
v
i
e
w

S
c
o
r
e
F
i
n
a
l

s
c
o
r
e
Overall
List the Key activities initiated and closed by Employee for whom your providing feedback
List the Weeknesses of Employee for whom your providing feedback
Average (acceptable performance)
good (often exceeds acceptable performance)
excellent (truly superior performance)
S
l
.

N
o
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

S
k
i
l
l
s
E
x
p
l
a
n
a
t
i
o
n
Fair (marginally acceptable performance)
Peer Name - 1
Direct Team member
Deparment
Rating Scale:
Poor (unacceptable performance)
Yes / No
2
3
4
5
Name
Date and Place
<<Back to Guidelines
PEER Evaluation
List the Strenghts of Employee for whom your providing feedback
R
e
m
a
r
k
s
List the Key activities initiated and closed by Employee for whom your providing feedback
List the Weeknesses of Employee for whom your providing feedback
1-2:
3-4:
5-6:
7-8:
9-10:
1 Timely Submission of documents TA bills, leave application forms 20% 0
2 Time and Attendance as per records (machine) 20% 0
3 Adherance to Office Policies following of policies and adherance of the same 20%
0
4 Organisational values
Alignment and adherance to basic values and principles
as followed by the firm
20%
0
5 Overall Professionalism
demonstrates professional behaviour in presentation of
self, at work, with colleagues, clients etc
20%
0
100% 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
Name
Date
W
e
i
g
h
t
a
g
e
H
R

S
c
o
r
e
w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d

s
c
o
r
e
HR Comment if any
Average (acceptable performance)
good (often exceeds acceptable performance)
excellent (truly superior performance)
S
l
.

N
o
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

S
k
i
l
l
s
E
x
p
l
a
n
a
t
i
o
n
Fair (marginally acceptable performance)
HR Evaluation
HR/ADMIN REP NAME
Assessment Year
Rating Scale:
Poor (unacceptable performance)
<<Back to Guidelines
R
e
m
a
r
k
s
HR Comment if any
HR Evaluation
1-2:
3-4:
5-6:
7-8:
9-10:
1 Job Knowledge
Demonstrates understanding of the project scope, knowledge of
the subject matter; provides technical inputs on assignments;
Content Analysis and reasoning
15%
2 Quality of work and enagement Research and recommendations are thorough 30%
3 Timelines management Adherence to deadlines as committed 25%
4 client handling Managing queries; handling issues; solutioning 20%
5 Attitude to work and project in hand Positive, encourages others, motivate others 10%
100%
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
excellent (truly superior performance)
CLIENT REVIEW FORM
Individual reviewed Project worked on
Client name Client Representative Name
Project start date Project end date
Rating Scale:
Poor (unacceptable performance)
Fair (marginally acceptable performance)
Average (acceptable performance)
good (often exceeds acceptable performance)
List Appreciations / Recommendations
S
l
.

N
o
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

S
k
i
l
l
s
E
x
p
l
a
n
a
t
i
o
n
W
e
i
g
h
t
a
g
e
List Improvement Areas and Complaints
Other comments for justifying review.
5
Name
Date and Place
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
CLIENT REVIEW FORM
Project worked on
Client Representative Name
Project end date
R
e
m
a
r
k
s
List Appreciations / Recommendations
C
l
i
e
n
t

r
a
t
i
n
g
F
i
n
a
l
/
R
e
v
i
e
w
e
r

S
c
o
r
e
List Improvement Areas and Complaints
Other comments for justifying review.
<<Back to Guidelines
Official Name
Deparment
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Name
Date and Place
Rating Scale:
1-2: Poor
(unacceptable
performance)
3-4: Fair (marginally
acceptable
performance)
5-6: Average
(acceptable
performance)
7-8: good (often
exceeds acceptable
performance)
9-10: excellent
(truly superior
performance)
Government Official Feedback form
List Appreciations / Recomensations
List Improvement Areas and Feedack
Other Comments
Government Official Feedback form
List Appreciations / Recomensations
List Improvement Areas and Feedack
Other Comments
<<Back to Guidelines
Government Official Feedback form
List Appreciations / Recomensations
List Improvement Areas and Feedack
Other Comments
Knowledge
Behaviour
Attitude
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DAP - Development Action Plan
Skills
Improvement Areas (Weakness)
KRA for next year
Competency (Strengh)
Training Needs Identified
1 <<Back to Guidelines
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DAP - Development Action Plan