Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
doi:10.1093/ejo/cji079
Advance Access publication 30 September 2005
The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontics Society.
All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.
How does temperature inuence the properties of rectangular
nickel titanium wires?
Maurcio Tatsuei Sakima , Michel Dalstra and Birte Melsen
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Aarhus, Denmark
SUMMARY Thermodynamic nickel titanium (NiTi) wires have become increasingly popular. The relationship
between the temperature variation within the mouth and the force level delivered is, however, far
from elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inuence of possible intraoral temperature
differences on the forces exerted by seven commercially available 0.019 0.025 inch NiTi archwires.
As mouth temperature ranges from 33 to 37C most of the time, all wires were tested at ve different
temperatures between 30 and 40C in an orthodontic wire-testing device, a so-called Force System
Identication (FSI) apparatus, placed in a climate chamber. In the FSI a two-bracket system using self-
ligating Damon brackets simulated rst order displacements up to 4 mm. At each temperature ve samples
of each archwire brand were tested. The following variables from the activation/deactivation curves were
calculated: force and displacement at the yield point, maximum force level, total energy up to maximum
displacement, energy loss after deactivation, force and displacement at the beginning and at the nish of
the plateau, and the slope of the plateau. Any statistically signicant differences in these variables for the
different brands and temperature levels were analysed using one-way analysis of variance.
The results showed that: (1) The behaviour of all wires was different. (2) Copper NiTi40 showed the
lowest and the most constant force level, followed by NeoSentalloy 200 g. On the other hand, these
wires may not work properly in mouth breathers as no forces were exerted below 35C. (3) If the use
of superelastic characteristics and low force levels are the reasons for utilizing rectangular NiTi wires,
austenitic NiTi wires should be avoided.
Introduction
Nickel titanium (NiTi) wires are widely used within
orthodontics as they combine shape memory effect and
superelasticity with excellent corrosion and mechanical
properties, and good biocompatibility.
Shape memory is desirable, as the return to its original
austenitic phase from a pronounced plastic deformation of
the same wire in its martensitic phase allows for a long
range of activation. The superelasticity is likewise related to
the internal transformation, the consequence of which is the
release of a constant force over a considerable part of the
deactivation. This has been illustrated by a load-deection
plot with a horizontal plateau during unloading, which
implies that a constant force may be exerted over a long
range of tooth movement ( Burstone et al. , 1985 ; Miura
et al. , 1986 ). The transformation of austenite into martensite
can be either induced by cooling or produced by stress.
Martensite formation can be initiated by cooling the material
below M
s
(dened as the temperature at which martensitic
transformations begins). M
f
is the temperature at which
martensitic transformation ends. The transformation is
reversible, and A
s
is the temperature at which the reverse
austenitic transformation (martensite austenite) begins
upon heating, and A
f
is the temperature at the end of the
reverse austenitic transformation. When stress is applied to
the material above its A
f
temperature, an elastic martensitic
phase is stress-induced in alloys that exhibit thermoelastic
behaviour ( Barwart, 1996 ). The stress necessary to induce
the formation of stress-induced martensite (SIM) is a linear
function of temperature. When the applied stress is released
below A
s
, the shape change produced remains, because
reverse rearrangements of twins and martensite variants
have not occurred. However, on heating through the A
s
-to-
A
f
temperature range, the material regains its original shape
by a reverse transformation from martensite to austenite.
Thus, the original shape is re-established and the deformation
of the martensitic phase recovered (shape memory effect).
Early martensitic superelastic NiTi wires exhibited shape
memory characteristics, but their transitional temperature
range (TTR) made it impractical to exploit this property for
orthodontic treatment. Burstone et al. (1985) and Miura
et al. (1986) introduced austenitic NiTi, which presented
superelastic characteristics. More recently, third and fourth
generation temperature-dependent heat activated (also
called thermoresponsive or thermodynamic) NiTi wires
have been marketed with clinical useful shape memory.
The evaluation of the physical properties has been
ascertained either by cantilever tests ( Burstone et al. , 1985 ;
Khier et al. , 1991 ), or three-point bending ( Miura et al. ,
1986 ; Yoneyama et al. , 1993 ; Tonner and Waters, 1994 ;
Ibe and Segner, 1998 ; Nakano et al. , 1999 ; Iijima et al. ,
2002 ; Wilkinson et al. , 2002 ; Fischer-Brandies et al. , 2003 ;
Parvizi and Rock, 2003 ). Three-point bending tests offer
reproducibility, which has facilitated comparison between
283
TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENCY OF NITI WIRES
studies. However, none of these methods simulate the
clinical situation. This is the reason why the three-bracket
method was introduced ( Oltjen et al. , 1997 ). In spite of
many attempts, the ideal test cannot be performed, since the
clinical efciency depends not only on force systems and
surface related variables, but also the delivery of the force
and the functional environment into which the wire is
inserted. It has been suggested that the most appropriate
wire test may be that which reproduces conditions
encountered clinically, where the wire is constrained as part
of a xed appliance. Oltjen et al. (1997) demonstrated
signicant differences between the three-point bending test
and the three-bracket bending mode, and similar ndings
were found by Parvizi and Rock (2003) .
The physical properties of the new thermodynamic NiTi
wires have made it possible to insert larger guage rectangular
wires during the initial phases of orthodontic treatment in
order to gain three-dimensional control of tooth movement.
Although many studies have focused on the evaluation of
NiTi wires ( Table 1 ), large guage rectangular wires have not
yet been submitted to any laboratory tests, leaving clinicians
to rely only on the manufacturers information.
Variation in mouth temperature throughout a 24-hour
period has been studied in several ways, but the median
cluster is around 35C with variation occurring over time
( Moore et al. , 1999 ) and within the different locations of
the mouth ( Volchansky and Cleaton-Jones, 1994 ; Airoldi
et al. , 1997 ). The reported range was generally large, up
to 50C, although the peak values were only reached for
very short periods and mostly in the palatal zone. The
majority of the time (79 per cent), mouth temperature
ranged between 33 and 37C. Most studies were performed
at 37C while others were carried out at 35C ( Table 1 ).
The inuence of changes in force delivery within the
Table 1 NiTi wire-testing studies that expressed the temperature in which the tests were performed.
Reference Testing mode Temperature (C) Cross-sections of NiTi type / manufacturer
wire (inches)
Burstone et al. (1985) Cantilever 22, 37, 60 0.016 Martensitic (M-NiTi), Austenitic (A-NiTi) /
conguration Ormco, 3M Unitek
Khier et al. (1991) Cantilever 22 0.016, 0.018, M-NiTi, A-NiTi / 3M Unitek, GAC, Lancer,
conguration 0.018 0.025, Rocky Mountain
0.021 0.025
Miura et al. (1986) Three-point 37 0.014, 0.016, M-NiTi, A-NiTi / 3M Unitek, Tomy Inc.
bending test 0.018, 0.020, 0.022
Yoneyama et al. (1993) Three-point 37 0.039 Not reported
bending test
Tonner and Waters (1994) Three-point 5, 15, 20, 25, 0.014, 0.016, M-NiTi, A-NiTi / GAC, Orthocare, Forestadent,
bending test 30, 35, 40, 50 0.018 Dentaurum, Russell and Baker, Masel, Orthomax,
3M Unitek, American Orthodontics, Ormco, Lancer
Ibe and Segner (1998) Three-point 35 0.016 0.022 Thermodynamic, A-NiTi / GAC, Forestadent, Masel,
bending test Imperial Precise
Nakano et al. (1999) Three-point 37 0.016, 0.016 0.022 Thermodynamic, M-NiTi, A-NiTi / A-Company,
bending test Hoya, Lancer, Sankin, Ormco, Rocky Mountain,
GAC, TP, 3M Unitek
Fischer-Brandies et al. Three-point 22, 37, 60 0.016 0.022 Thermodynamic, M-NiTi, A-NiTi / GAC, Ormco,
(2002) bending test Dentaurum, Forestadent, Lancer
Iijima et al. (2002) Three-point 23, 37, 60 0.016 0.022 Thermodynamic, A-NiTi / Ormco, Tomy Inc.
bending test
Wilkinson et al. (2002) Three-point bending 22, 35.5, 44 0.016 A-NiTi, Thermodynamic / GAC, Ormco, TP,
test, orthodontic Dentaurum, 3M Unitek
brackets
Parvizi and Rock (2003) Three-point bending 20, 30, 40 0.016, 0.016 0.022 A-NiTi, Thermodynamic / 3M Unitek, Direct
test, phantom Ortho, Ortho Care
head test
Santoro and Beshers Three-bracket 4 to 60 in 0.018, 0.016 0.022, Thermodynamic / GAC, Ormco, 3M Unitek
(2000) bending tests steps of 3 0.017 0.025
Gurgel et al. (2001) Three-bracket 35 0.017 0.025 Thermodynamic, A-NiTi / Ormco, Masel,
bending tests Morelli, 3M Unitek, GAC, Dentaurum, TP
Filleul et al. (1997) Torsion 37 0.017 0.025, Thermodynamic, A-NiTi / Ormco, GAC
0.018 0.025
Meling and degaard Torsion 18, 27, 37, 40 0.016 0.022, Thermodynamic, M-NiTi, A-NiTi, Multi-stranded /
(1998) 0.017 0.025, Dentaurum, Forestadent, GAC, Highland Metals,
0.018 0.025 Masel, Ormco, 3M Unitek
Gurgel et al. (2001) Torsion 35 0.017 0.025 Thermodynamic, A-NiTi / Ormco, Masel, Morelli,
3M Unitek, GAC, Dentaurum, TP
M. T. SAKIMA ET AL.
284
above-mentioned range has not yet been described in
detail.
It was, therefore, the aim of the present study to evaluate
the inuence of possible intraoral temperature differences
on the forces exerted by seven commercially available
0.019 0.025 inch NiTi archwires.
Materials and methods
The seven NiTi wires analysed in this study and their
respective codes are shown in Table 2 . All wires were tested
in an orthodontic wire-testing device, the Force System
Identication (FSI) apparatus, which was developed at the
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University
of Aarhus, Denmark. The wire was clamped into two wire
holders, in which mechanical sensors are placed. The
moments and forces generated between the wire and the
holders are transformed into electrical impulses by means
of specially developed strain gauges. Six step motors control
the translation and rotation of the two holders in three planes
of space. The displacements of the holders are computer
controlled, and input for these is supplied by the user. The
moments and forces developed are stored in the computer,
together with the positions of the holders, for further
statistical analysis. The error of the method for this system
has been evaluated ( Menghi et al. , 1999 ).
A self-ligating Damon bracket for the upper rst premolar
(Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) was xed in the
centre of both holders of the FSI system ( Figure 1 ). Initially,
the two brackets, xed on the two holders, were placed in
alignment to each other at a distance of 5 mm. The tested
wires comprised 15 mm long pieces of straight wire inserted
passively into the two aligned brackets. During testing, the
brackets were displaced in translation, in steps of 0.2 mm
up to 4 mm and back to the aligned position again. This
simulated Class I geometry in an aligning phase (rst order
movements). Forces and moments were recorded
corresponding to each step. The force systems developed in
the rst order are reported here. Five wires of each batch
were tested at ve different temperatures.
The tests were performed inside a climate chamber
(Department. of Environmental Medicine, University of
Aarhus) with a precision of 0.3C at the following
temperatures: 30, 33, 35, 37 and 40C. The wires were kept
inside the climate chamber with the stabilized temperature
for at least two hours prior to testing.
Before statistical evaluation of the data was carried out,
corrections were made to the raw data for differences
between the locations where the forces and moments were
measured and the centre of the brackets. The activation/
deactivation curve of the NiTi wires is characterized by
three distinct phases reecting the transformation between
austenite and martensite. In order to compare the curves
characterizing the different wires and the inuence of
the different temperatures, a number of variables were
determined.
Figure 2 illustrates a typical force and moment curve in
which the above-mentioned variables and their denitions
are shown.
The means and standard deviations were calculated for
all variables for each set of measurements. The intra-batch
variation was evaluated, as was the inuence of temperature
for each batch. The different products were compared both
with respect to intra-batch variation as average behaviour.
The behaviour of each wire in the different tested
temperatures (intra-wire) and of different wires in the same
temperature (inter-wire) were compared using one-way
analysis of variance, followed by the Student Newman
Keuls post-hoc test.
Results
The temperature dependency of the individual wires is
illustrated in Figure 3 . Regardless of the force level, the
Formo-Elastic Wonder Wire (WWFE) demonstrated the
smallest range (635 699 cN) in the force delivered during
the transition between the temperatures of 30 and 40C. The
normal NiTi (ON) revealed the most pronounced temperature
dependency, augmenting the force delivery from 216 to 465
cN when the temperature increased.
Graphs of the unloading curves of the seven wires at the
ve temperatures are shown in Figure 4 . Although all tested
wires had the same dimensions, three different groups could
be distinguished when the tests were performed at 30 and
33C. At 35, 37 and 40C four different behaviours could be
observed by visual inspection.
Table 2 Overview of the seven commercially available NiTi wires used in the present study.
Code Wire brand Manufacturer Type
C35 35C Thermo-Active Copper NiTi