Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 2
AIR POWER
Air power is the most difficult of military force to measure or even to express in
precise terms. The problem is compounded by the fact that aviation tends to attract
adventurous souls, physically adept, mentally alert and pragmatically rather than
philosophically inclined.
Winston Churchill
The aim of this Chapter is to define air power and identify the key characteristics that
need to be considered if air power is to be properly exploited in the conduct of joint and
multinational operations. This Chapter covers the British definition of air power, offers
a brief overview of air power history,1 and highlights the factors that apply for the
exploitation of air power. The Chapter includes a section on air power and the
Principles of War and an introduction to the British core capabilities of air power.
Air Power
The ability to project military force in air or space by or from a platform or
missile operating above the surface of the earth. Air platforms are defined as
any aircraft, helicopter or unmanned air vehicle.
This definition does not exclude civilian elements such as contractor support,
particularly to sustain air operations, as Chapter 10 makes clear.
1
A full history of the development of air power doctrine is at Chapter 12.
By the beginning of the Second World War, no military activity could ignore the third
dimension. When air power was properly targeted and co-ordinated it proved
influential in all theatres of war and, on occasion, decisive. Hard-earned experience
confirmed the fundamental characteristics of air power in the minds of all military
planners: speed, height, reach, and added ubiquity and flexibility.3
Since 1945, trends in the development of air power have accelerated dramatically.
During the Cold War, investment in platform, sensor and weapon technology allowed
air-to-air and air-to-ground weapon delivery accuracy to improve and space-based
systems to become a reality. Furthermore, force multipliers such as helicopters, tankers
and tactical air transport have enabled rapid manoeuvre in all environments. Now, air
power is much less distinctly focused exclusively on air forces - the exploitation of air
power is a joint and multinational business. Air warfare is now just as much a part of
land and maritime warfare as it is a separate discipline. The provision of air power:
● Is influenced by, and in turn influences, the land, sea and space environments.
2
There is a rich historiography of this subject. Recent coverage is contained in Mason, R A, Air Power,
A Centennial Appraisal, Brassey’s 1994 and Mielinger, P, (Ed), Paths to Heaven, AU, 1997.
3
Royal Air Force Manual ‘Operations’ (AP 1300), last reprint 1964, covers the historical and, largely, descriptive
view of doctrine for air operations.
● Aircraft Carriers. Aircraft carriers offer the Joint Task Force Commander (JTFC) a
unique source of air power that is largely immune to the constraints of host-nation
support and national airspace overflight rights. Capable of conducting sea control and
power projection, embarked joint force aircraft can conduct air power across the full
spectrum of indirect and direct air operations. While forces in most regional conflicts
will enjoy access to airfields and host-nation support, in some cases they may not.
Additionally, crises may erupt with such rapidity that a response may be required
before agreements for basing rights and airspace use can be obtained. In these
circumstances, carrier-based aviation may afford the joint commander an enabling
package of air power from the early stages of a crisis, poised near the zone of crisis.
In joint operations involving aircraft from land and sea, the Joint Force Maritime
Component Commander (JFMCC) will normally assign sorties over and above those
he requires for sea control to the Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC) in
support of the joint campaign. Further maritime command and control considerations
are covered in Chapter 3 and BR 1806, British Maritime Doctrine.
Embarked aircraft can conduct air power across the full spectrum
of indirect and direct air operations.
● Airfields. Although all forms of military power depend to a greater or lesser extent on
base support, most air vehicles depend on ground support facilities, particularly
airfields. Airfields vary in size and scale, from joint civil/military international airports
to rough grass or desert airstrips. Aircraft need base support if they are to operate at
maximum sortie rates. A network of alternative operating bases with well spaced, multi-
purpose operating surfaces provides a degree of redundancy and makes them less
vulnerable to attack depending on the scenario. Air power platforms can be launched
direct from peacetime bases, simplifying logistics, since it may be more cost-effective in
time, movement effort and money to use in-place facilities and logistics. For example,
during Operation ALLIED FORCE, RAF Tornado GR1s operated from their home base in
Germany to attack targets in the former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
● Basing considerations. Planning factors that should be taken into account are:
destination, distance, demand and duration. Although air-to-air refuelling (AAR) can
extend reach and allow more distant deployment bases to be used, the extra matériel
and manpower costs generated by the need for AAR need to be taken into account.
● Coalition Capability. Military forces employing air power systems generally share
commonality of purpose, training and outlook. This commonality has arisen because
of the nature of the environment in which air power is used. Furthermore, different
air arms employ largely similar command and control procedures. Based on this large
measure of commonality, air power can be integrated into combined forces for
multinational and coalition operations. Likely coalition partners may have similar
doctrine and may train and exercise together on a regular basis. This synergy, coupled
with the use of English as the internationally agreed language of the air, can represent
an important force multiplier for the employment of air power, thereby helping to
build unity of effort.
● Flexibility/Versatility. Air vehicles are flexible and versatile weapons systems. Air
assets can be diverted at any time in flight from one target to another or the assigned
task can be changed. Modern multi-role air platforms and systems can be
reconfigured quickly for other roles, whilst aircraft configured for multi-missions can
carry out more than one specialist task during a single sortie. Commanders and
planners need to be aware, however, of the logistic burden in terms of the variety of
weapon stocks required to perform multi-missions.
● Fragility - Ease of Destruction. Modern air warfare demands that air vehicles have
sophisticated performance characteristics. Modern air vehicles could be vulnerable to
enemy air defences. As air power technology has advanced, so has the technology of
air defences particularly surface-to-air missiles (SAM). Therefore, the suppression of
enemy air defences (SEAD) is a crucial role for air power and is covered in greater
detail in Chapter 5. The inherent fragility of aircraft can be ameliorated by speed,
stealth and self-protection measures. When combined, such protection can make
aircraft and weapon systems difficult targets for an enemy to engage. Furthermore,
modern techniques of battle damage repair can do much to make good damage that
has been sustained.
● Penetration. Air power systems can circumvent obstacles and penetrate deep into
enemy territory. Space-based surveillance systems are relatively invulnerable and can
monitor the entire surface of the globe virtually unhindered. Air power is part of
manoeuvre warfare, since air vehicles enjoy high levels of manoeuvre at all levels of
warfare. Manoeuvre from the air and deep penetration can be combined to enhance
the overall combat power of sea and land power.
● Perspective. The ability to offer a wide perspective of the battlespace from the air
remains one of the defining characteristics of air power. The operating altitudes of
aircraft and satellites allows military personnel to gain a general picture of an area of
interest rapidly whilst giving them a different perspective of the whole area of
operations which extends beyond the area or horizon of immediate interest.
● Poise and Stand-Off. The range of modern air systems enables them to loiter in the air
or wait on the ground near to a potential area of operations. Long range aircraft can,
therefore, have an influence from hundreds or even thousands of miles away, while the
despatch of aircraft near to an area of crisis demonstrates commitment and resolve.
● Reach. Air vehicles can project military power over great distances, unconstrained by
the physical barriers of topography. The range at which air power can be used from
bases, either ashore or afloat, can be extended by the use of AAR. AAR allows the
radius of action and/or time on task to be extended many times over. This reach allows
air power to strike at distant targets and to reach isolated locations whilst, if necessary,
avoiding potential threats or restrictions both physical and political.
The range at which air power can be used from bases, either ashore or afloat,
can be extended by the use of air-to-air refuelling.
● Maintenance of morale.
● Security.
● Surprise.
● Offensive action.
● Concentration of force.
● Economy of effort.
● Flexibility.
● Cooperation.
● Sustainability.
The value of the Principles of War as a guide to commanders will depend on the
understanding of the individual commander, his knowledge of operational art and his
skill in applying the principles within a particular operational context. While the relative
importance of each principle will depend on circumstances, successful application of
the Principles of War requires sound military judgement. Failure to take account of these
hard-won lessons can lead to mission failure.
There are slight differences in the interpretation of these principles within the maritime,
land and air environments. History shows how the Principles of War apply to air power:4
● Selection and Maintenance of the Aim. In the conduct of war and all military
operations, it is essential to select and define the aim with absolute clarity before joint
or multinational air operations begin. Once the military aim is decided, all efforts must
be directed at achieving the aim unless the situation changes and re-appreciation
requires the commander to adopt a new or modified aim. Every plan of action at
every level for the exploitation of air power must be tested by the extent to which it
contributes to the achievement of the military aim at the next highest level of
command. This leads ultimately to the accomplishment of the overall military aim and
hence to the fulfilment of the political aim and the desired end-state. It follows
therefore that:
● Commanders at all levels must know exactly what they are required to achieve and
must make that quite clear to their appropriate subordinates. They should not
waste effort on courses of action which do not directly, or indirectly, contribute to
the attainment of their aim.
● Air tasks, roles and missions must be consistent and coherent with the overall
strategy and campaign plan. This process is known as strategy-to-task. Further
details are in Chapter 3.
● Maintenance of Morale. Success in all forms of war depends more on morale than
on material conditions. Morale is a mental state but is very sensitive to material
conditions. It is based on a clear understanding of the aim, on training and on
discipline and is immediately responsive to effective leadership. It is adversely
affected by inferior or inefficient equipment and depends to a large degree on sound
administration. Outstanding leadership will sustain high morale when all other factors
are against it and success in battle is the best stimulant of morale.
4
See Chapter 14 - Further Reading - for more details.
● Surprise. Surprise action can achieve results out of all proportion to the effort
expended. In air operations, when other factors are unfavourable to friendly forces,
surprise might be essential to achieve mission success. Air power can achieve
surprise strategically, operationally, tactically, or by exploiting new technologies,
material or techniques. The elements of surprise are secrecy, concealment, deception,
originality, audacity and speed. All apply to the exploitation of air power at all levels
of military activity.
● Flexibility. Flexibility is one of the prime advantages of air power. Although the aim
might not alter, a commander might be required to exercise judgement and flexibility
by modifying plans to meet changing circumstances, take advantage of fleeting
opportunities or shift the main effort of the joint campaign or air operations.
Flexibility demands trust, good training, organisation, discipline, staff work and rapid
decision-making when time is of the essence. To be flexible requires sustainability
and a degree of mobility, which ensures that redeployments can take place both
rapidly and economically, so that the weight of effort can be altered as required.
They are covered in greater detail in UK Doctrine for Joint and Multinational Operations
(JWP 0-10). All apply to the effective exploitation of air power.
must rely on the support and contribution of regular, full and part time reserve forces,
civilians and contractors to achieve mission success. There are three elements that merit
consideration within the moral component:
● Leadership.
● The nature of leadership has been a source of debate throughout history, but there
has never been any doubt about its importance as a war-winning factor.
Inspirational leadership is one of the foremost elements in raising and sustaining
morale, which has often proved to be a decisive ingredient in determining the
outcome of military operations, even against the most overwhelming odds. Born
leaders tend to be few, but a good proportion of the art of leadership can be
learned, particularly from the example of others. Successful leadership can take
many forms and styles both in the air and on the ground, but invariably includes
professional mastery and moral courage. Study of history is seldom wasted if one
wants to understand what makes a good leader.
● Historically, air forces have tended to foster an ethos which is different from those
at sea or on land. Although all personnel on an airfield, aircraft carrier or forward
operating strip may share the same dangers if attacked, only a small minority -
aircrew - directly and regularly engage in direct combat. Leadership in the air
similarly takes many forms. At more senior levels of command, air leaders are
isolated from the immediate air action by the centralisation of control that the
efficient use of air power demands, fostering what can be perceived as a remote
style of leadership.5 At all levels, air commanders must recognise that the largest
proportion of their personnel provide support on the ground and that this generates
additional but equally important demands on them as commanders.
● A fighting force in peacetime must provide the encouragement and the conditions
in which leaders of different styles can thrive and develop.
● Core Values. Core values are the permanent foundations on which the identity and
purpose of the British Armed Forces are built and are a small number of ethically
based principles which serve, in all circumstances, to guide the behaviour of members
of the Service in a way which both furthers its purpose and is ethically sound. Just as
the nature of warfare does not change, so the core values necessary for its successful
and ethical prosecution have remained constant. Core values can be expressed in
many ways, but will always include such recognisably military virtues as physical
courage, total commitment and service before self. In addition, virtues such as
integrity and moral courage are no less important to the armed forces of a nation
which is pledged to uphold international laws and conventions relating to the use of
military force. Core values capture the very essence of what is important to the
5
Vallance, A G B, The Air Weapon, (Macmillan Press and St Martin’s Press inc. 1996), p. 31-32.
Service and those who serve within it, thereby engendering justifiable pride.
Although important at all times, they are most valuable at times of extreme personal
commitment, when together with leadership and training, they sustain and inspire
personnel in circumstances which might otherwise overwhelm them.
● Information Exploitation. Air and space vehicles can provide information through
the gathering, collection, fusion and flow of data to inform joint and multinational
operations around the spectrum of conflict.
● Control of the Air. Air power platforms and weapon systems provide the degree of
control of the air required to ensure sufficient freedom of action for military
operations. The degree of control required will depend on the context and the scale
of the operation and may be limited in time and space. Control of the air may be
achieved by denying an opponent access to his own airspace, or by denying the
freedom of own airspace to an opponent.
● Strategic Effect. Air power can be employed for strategic effect on targets at all levels
of warfare and all scales of conflict. Missions for strategic effect may be tasked distinct
from theatre operations. Air power roles for strategic effect are not limited to
bombardment or attack missions, but may encompass several role and mission types.
● Joint Force Employment. Air power has great utility in indirect and direct air
operations to enable joint or combined military operations. Indirect air operations can
shape and prepare the battlespace for surface forces, while direct air operations can
prove decisive in concentrating force and allowing manoeuvre from the air to
complement rotary-air and surface force manoeuvre.
● Combat Support Air Operations. Combat support air operations are pervasive in
the support of all joint and multinational operations. Air power can be used to
enhance many forms of combat power by undertaking a wide range of combat
support missions.
● Force Protection. Force protection has air and ground elements and is an essential
element of all air operations.
Part Two examines the core capabilities of air power in detail to provide a greater
understanding of how to exploit air power in a wide variety of roles and missions across
the spectrum of conflict.