Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

AERONAUTIC COMPONENT OPTIMIZATION WITH NON-SMOOTH BUCKLING

LOAD CRITERION
JOO C. S. CAMPOS
*
Ext ended abst ract of t he MSc t hesi s wi t h t he same t i t l e (i n Port uuese!
*AFA - Portuguese Air Force Academy, and IST - Instituto Superior Tcnico, Technical University of is!on, Portugal"

Abstract: "n this wor#$ an o%timi&ation method to maximi&e linear buc#lin load factors was im%lemented. 'he structural elastic stabilit( was
studied usin a )inite Element Method based on the Mindlin Plate 'heor(. 'he o%timi&ation im%lementation uses commercial finite element
software Ansys
#
to obtain the linear buc#lin res%onse and the Method of Mo*in As(m%totes. 'o sol*e the o%timi&ation %roblem the buc#lin
load sensiti*it( with res%ect to desin *ariables was deri*ed from direct differentiation method with the ad+oint method and im%lemented at
$ata!
,
. 'he conce%t of -enerali&ed -radient is a%%lied to o*ercome the re%eated eien*alue %roblem which ma#es the %roblem non.smooth.
'he method was *erified with sim%le o%timi&ation exam%les and results were *alidated com%arin the o%timi&ation buc#lin factors of beams
and %lates with results from the literature. Authors underline that in structures with a sinificant %resence of nonlinear effects$ linear buc#lin
anal(sis and o%timi&ation ma( not be the correct strate(. /owe*er$ in some cases$ there is the %ossibilit( to sim%lif( the eometr( and loads in
order to be within the linear buc#lin assum%tions. "n this wor#$ such an a%%roach is tested to an u%%er surface win %anel which is
characteri&ed b( local buc#lin. 'he first bifurcation load$ obtained with nonlinear anal(sis$ increased 012 after the %ro%osed linear buc#lin
o%timi&ation. "n linear buc#lin o%timi&ation$ structures with re%eated or almost re%eated buc#lin loads fre3uentl( arise. "n these structures$ the
buc#lin load im%erfections4 sensiti*it( can be hih. "n this wor#$ a %arametric stud( of buc#lin load sensiti*it( due to the %roximit( between the
lowest critical loads is %resented. "n the tested cases was obser*ed that$ buc#lin load does not decrease due to the %roximit( between the first
and second buc#lin load.
Key!r"s: 5inear 6uc#lin O%timi&ation7 8onlinear 6uc#lin Anal(sis7 "m%erfections sensiti*it(7 5ocal 6uc#lin7 Aeronautic Structures.

#$ INTRODUCTION
#$# MOTI%ATION
9eiht is one of the main factors that influence aircraft
%erformance. )urthermore$ weiht also translates into
cost due to its influence on s%ecific consum%tion$
aerod(namic resistance and trans%ortin ca%abilit( of
caro and:or %asseners.
Aeronautical structures4 confiuration$ t(%icall( consist
of slender elements which %ro*ide structurall( efficient
solutions. 'he structural efficienc( has also increased
with the recent contribution of new materials introduced
in the aircraft industr( ;<=$ includin aluminum allo(s
and com%osites with a hih ratio of ultimate mechanical
strenth and weiht. /owe*er$ in some cases$
structurall( efficient solutions are limited for reasons of
structural stabilit($ which is a ma+or desin re3uirement
in com%onents sub+ected to com%ressi*e forces$
twistin and:or shear. 6uc#lin is one of the most
im%ortant ob+ecti*e:constraints in structural desin. "n
this wor# and for sim%licit( reasons$ it is assumed that
buc#lin is the onl( mode of structural colla%se in
consideration.
'raditionall($ in o%timi&ation$ stabilit( is treated as linear
buc#lin load. Most desin codes are based on linear
buc#lin anal(sis (i.e. Euler a%%roach! which is
calculated b( the lineari&ed eien*alue %roblem. 'he
a%%licabilit( of this anal(sis is reduced b( its limitations$
namel( inca%acit( to include im%erfections and
nonlinear effects in structural res%onse. 6ecause of
that$ buc#lin load is an u%%er bound. Exam%les in
which the ex%erimental results aree with this a%%roach
were %resented b( 'imoshen#o and -ere ;>=.
'a#in into account eometric im%erfections and:or
eccentric loads re3uires nonlinear anal(sis. 9hen
includin these effects in stabilit( anal(sis$ the
e3uilibrium %ath do not exhibit the bifurcation of
e3uilibrium$ instead$ there is the %ossibilit( that a limit
%oint occurs. 'his %oint is associated with a i*en load$
z
I
$ lower than the bifurcation load$ z
c
. 'hus$ critical
load com%utation usin nonlinear anal(sis ma#es a
stabilit( stud( more realistic as in ?real? structures
im%erfections are alwa(s %resent.
#$& BRIE' LITERATURE RE%IEW
5indaard and 5und recentl( de*elo%ed an o%timi&ation
methodolo( with nonlinear stabilit( criterion in
com%osites and laminates$ where the desin *ariables
are the fibers4 orientations. 'he lower critical load factor
is detected b( limit %oint ;0= and bifurcation and:or limit
%oint in reference ;@=. "n both wor#s$ the o%timi&ation
%roblem is sol*ed b( Mathematical Prorammin and
the radients are calculated semi.anal(ticall(. 'he
eneral t(%e nonlinear buc#lin formulation was
benchmar#ed aainst the traditional linear buc#lin
formulation and much better results were achie*ed
throuh nonlinear buc#lin o%timi&ation. 'his
com%arison was made in two numerical exam%lesA a
beam with B.section and a blade of a wind turbine$ both
modeled with shell finite elements. "n reference ;C=
o%timi&ation results are com%ared usin different
methods to %redict failure in terms of local buc#lin. 'he
criteria stud( includesA linear buc#lin$ nonlinear
buc#lin and local criterion (e.. extensions$
dis%lacements$ etc.!. "n the last criterion$ the
o%timi&ation formulation o%erates in a criterion function
formulated in terms of strain measures instead of
directl( on buc#lin.
"n o%timi&ed structures with stabilit( criterion the
buc#lin load is sensiti*e to eometric im%erfections.
5und studied the eometric im%erfections sensiti*it(
throuh the conce%t of the worst im%erfection ;D$ E=.
>
Aeronautic Com%onent O%timi&ation 9ith 8on.Smooth 6uc#lin 5oad Criterion
JoFo Cam%os 8o*ember >1<>
9orst im%erfection was defined as one which causes
the reatest decrease in the first critical load. 'his is
determined b( a minimi&ation %roblem where the
im%erfection sha%e is calculated throuh linear
combination of the first buc#lin modes and its
am%litude is limited b( linear constraints. After worst
im%erfection determination$ the critical load$ which is
defined as the bifurcation %oint or limit %oint that
a%%ears first in the e3uilibrium %ath$ is o%timi&ed. 'his
o%timi&ation %rocess was also im%lemented startin in
re*erse order$ i.e.$ the %rocess starts with the
o%timi&ation of the critical load and then the worst
im%erfection and the effects in the structure %re*iousl(
o%timi&ed are determined.
Gahmatalla and Swan ;H= im%lemented two o%timi&ation
formulations ta#in into account buc#lin
considerations. "n the first one$ the structure underoin
a s%ecific loadin is modeled as a h(%erelastic
continuum at finite deformations and is o%timi&ed to
maximi&e the minimum critical load. "n this case$ it is
considered that the instabilit( corres%onds to the first
limit %oint which arises in the load.dis%lacement
diaram. Sensiti*it( of critical load (i.e. %oint limit! is
calculated usin the ad+oint method. "n the second one$
the structure under a similar loadin is modeled as
linear elastic$ and the critical buc#lin load is com%uted.
'his o%timi&ation %roblem is de*elo%ed based on the
method %ro%osed b( 8e*es et al. ;I=. One of the
research findins relates to the fact that the formulation
based on lineari&ed stabilit( anal(sis is much more
com%utationall( efficient than the formulation based on
nonlinear anal(sis. "n some of their exam%les$ Swan
and Gahmatalla com%ared the solutions obtained with
both methods which were found to reliabl( (ield hih
buc#lin stabilit( desins.
'o%olo( o%timi&ation with linear elastic stabilit(
criterion can be a%%lied to aircraft com%onents.
Structural com%onents without cur*ature and sub+ect
onl( or mainl( to membrane efforts are ood exam%les.
Jhou ;<1= a%%lied to%olo( o%timi&ation with stabilit(
constraints to a win rib and com%ared the critical load
and weiht with results based on com%liance
minimi&ation. Jhou also discussed the existin
difficulties in to%olo( o%timi&ation with stabilit(
constraints$ namel( the sinularities and its influence on
the o%timal solution. "n addition$ it is discussed the
critical buc#lin modes %roblem a%%earin in low
densit( reion and their elimination throuh the use of
filters. 'his %roblem was first discussed b( 8e*es et al.
;I= who %ro%osed inorin the eometric stiffness matrix
in elements with low densit(. 'o a*oid discontinuit( of
the densit( function$ Simund and 6endsKe ;<<=
suested a different %enalt( for stiffness matrix and for
eometric matrix.
)olado and Godriues ;<>= im%lemented the
o%timi&ation method with stabilit( criterion in beams and
laminated %lates usin the homoeni&ation method.
8e*es et al. ;<0= a%%lies also to%olo( o%timi&ation with
stabilit( constraints to %eriodic structures modeled b(
linear elastic microstructures. 5ocal stabilit($ studied at
microstructure le*el$ is used to com%are different
material distributions in a base cell sub+ect to a field of
e3ual strains on macrosco%ic le*el.
#$( SCOPE O' THIS WORK
"n this wor#$ an o%timi&ation method to maximi&e the
minimum critical buc#lin load is im%lemented. 'he
critical load is achie*ed throuh linear buc#lin anal(sis.
'he desin *ariables are the com%onents thic#nesses
and the constraint is the total *olume of the structure.
As mentioned abo*e$ in structures with nonlinear
structural res%onse$ linear stabilit( anal(sis and linear
buc#lin o%timi&ation ma( not be a%%ro%riate$
%articularl( when instabilities arise b( limit %oint.
/owe*er$ in some cases there is the %ossibilit( of
sim%lif( eometr( and loads to ensure linear stabilit(
conditions. "n such cases$ the 3uestion that arises isA
when a structure is modeled$ anal(&ed and o%timi&ed
with sim%lifications of linear stabilit($ whether if it is$
e*en so$ %ossible to obtain an increase in critical load
achie*ed with nonlinear stabilit( anal(sis.
"n this extended abstract$ this a%%roach is a%%lied on a
sam%le win %anel which is sim%lified (eometricall(
and loadin.wise! and o%timi&ed in linear elastic
stabilit( conditions. 'he oal is to chec#$ with a
nonlinear stabilit( anal(sis$ if there is an increase in
critical load.
Another addressed %roblem concerns the fact that
linear stabilit( a%%roach cannot ta#e into account the
effects of im%erfections. Moreo*er$ in o%timi&ation of
buc#lin loads$ structures with re%eated critical loads
often arise. "n these structures$ critical load can be
hihl( sensiti*e to im%erfections ;<@$ <C$ <D$ <E=.
"n this extended abstract$ a %arametrical stud( of critical
load sensiti*it( to trans*ersal load disturbance is also
%resented. 'he aim is to *erif( the critical load
sensiti*it( (for this t(%e of disturbance! to the %roximit(
or e*en re%etition of the lowest critical loads$ usin
nonlinear stabilit( anal(sis to com%ute the critical load
of the %re*iousl( o%timi&ed structure.
&$ ANAL)SIS 'ORMULATION
9hen sol*in a structural o%timi&ation %roblem$ it is
fundamental to obtain$ anal(ticall( or numericall($ the
e3uilibrium e3uations solution.
Shell elements are widel( used to model the cur*ed
eometr( of a structure. Shell elements based on
classical shell theor( are difficult to de*elo%. 'hese
t(%es of elements are *er( efficient in modelin the
structure4s cur*ed eometr(. /owe*er$ because of the
com%lexities$ the alternati*e a%%roach is to model the
structure with series of flat elements$ which are sim%ler
and easier to formulate and im%lement.
"n this wor#$ Mindlin Plate 'heor( (MP'! is used
combined with a membrane theor($ resultin in a )lat
Shell Element. 'he %late element has three derees of
freedom b( node (two rotations and one trans*erse
dis%lacement! while the membrane element contains
0
Aeronautic Com%onent O%timi&ation 9ith 8on.Smooth 6uc#lin 5oad Criterion
JoFo Cam%os 8o*ember >1<>
two derees of freedom (membrane dis%lacements!.
'he drillin rotation 0
z
is not %art of %late4s theor(. "n
order to a*oid an ill.conditioned or e*en sinular
stiffness matrix$ flat shell elements are i*en a small
stiffness for drillin rotations 0
z
$ accordin to 6athe ;<H=.
"n the followin section$ we %resent the main
sim%lifications and assum%tions of MP'. 'his element
was com%utationall( im%lemented (in $ata!
,
! to
obtainin the structural matrices needed for the
sensiti*it( anal(sis of buc#lin load.
&$# MINDLIN PLATE THEOR)
'he assum%tions of MP' used for the %ur%oses of
re%resentin the dis%lacement and stresses field in
isotro%ic %lates are ;<I=A
the deformations are such that the %lanes
%er%endicular to the midsurface remain straiht$
but not necessaril( %er%endicular after deforma.
tion7
the strain %er%endicular to the midsurface is
neliible com%ared with the others$ so e
zz
= u7
the tension %er%endicular to the midsurface is
neliible com%ared with the others$ so o
zz
= u7
the dis%lacement of an arbitrar( %oint of the shell is
small com%ared with the thic#ness7
the deformations are infinitesimal.
Bnder this assum%tions$ the dis%lacement field of MP'
is of the formA
u = u
0
(x, y) z

0
1
(x, y) = u
0
(x, y) + z

(x, y)
: = :
0
(x, y) z

0
2
(x, y) = :
0
(x, y) z

0
x
(x, y)
w = w
0
(x, y),
E*$#
where u
0
$ :
0
e w
0
denote dis%lacements of a %oint on
%lane z = u.
'he -reen.5arane strains for M'P$ assumin
infinitesimal dis%lacements and inorin the nonlinear
terms are;<I=A
s (x, y, z) =
`
1
1
1
1
e
xx
e

y
x
y
z
y
xz 1
1
1
1
1
=
`
1
1
1
1
u,
x
:,

u,

+:,
x
:,
z
+ w,

u,
z
+ w,
x
1
1
1
1
1
, E*$&
where a comma denotes differentiation with res%ect to
the corres%ondin subscri%t. Ge%lacin the dis%lace.
ment field from E3.< into E3.>$ we obtain the strains.
dis%lacements relation for the %lateA
s
M
=
`
1
1
1
1
e
xx
e

y
x
y
z
y
xz 1
1
1
1
1
=
`
1
1
1
1
u
0,x
:
0,
u
0,
+ :
0,x
0
x
+ w,

+ w,
x 1
1
1
1
1
+ z

`
1
1
1
1
0
,x
0
x,
0
,
0
x,x
u
u
1
1
1
1
1
E*$(
where M means Mindlin %late. Bnli#e the Classical
'heor( of Plates$ rotations 0
x
and 0

are not ex%licit


functions of trans*erse dis%lacement deri*ati*es$ w$
since there is the deformations contribution due to the
shear strains y
z
and y
xz
. As a result$ there are fi*e
un#nown *ariables instead of three.
Assumin the h(%otheses of MP' and ta#in into
account the Princi%le of Lirtual 9or# ;>1=A
_ os
6
1
o
M

U
J0 = _ou
1
J
U
J0 + _ ou
1
t
U
2
J o0
2
,
v oJmissiblc ou
E*$+
where os
6
1
is a enerali&ed strain *ector for MP' and
o
M
is a *ector with moments and forces %er unit of
lenth. 'hat forces and moments can be obtained b(
interation of stress throuh thic#ness. Stress.strain
relation considerin homoeneous$ isotro%ic$ and
linearl( elastic material can be i*en b(A
o
M
= D
H
s E*$,
where D
M
is the stress.strain relation matrix for Mindlin
%late ;>1=.
Accordin to the %rinci%le of *irtual wor#$ when both
sides of the E3.@ are e3ual$ e3uilibrium is satisfied. 'he
first member re%resents the *irtual wor# done b(
internal forces and the second member the *irtual wor#
done b( external forces. "n other words$ E3.@ means
that for an( admissible *irtual dis%lacement$ ou$ the
strain increment ener( e3uals the wor# done b( the
*olume forces$ J$ and b( surface forces$ t. "n E3.@ the
MP' assum%tions leads to a linear elasticit( %roblem
because the strains os
6
1
corres%ond to the MP' strains
and the stress.strain relation is linear.
&$& LINEAR BUCKLING PROBLEM
5inear elastic stabilit( anal(sis (i.e. Euler a%%roach! is a
method to determine the critical buc#lin load of a
conser*ati*e bod( considerin the followin
assum%tions ;>1=A
the loadin is %ro%ortional to the surface tractions
and bod( forces$ i.e.$ t = z t
reJ
and J = z J
reJ
$
where t
reJ
and J
reJ
are res%ecti*el( the surface
tractions and bod( forces of a reference load$ thus$
the a%%lied load is onl( %ro%ortional to the load
%arameter$ z.
the extensions are limited to situations where the
dis%lacement radients are much lower than unit($
i.e. |u
,x
|, |:
,x
|, |w
,x
|, |u
,
|, |:
,
|, |w
,
| < 1.
in the critical confiuration$ dis%lacements ou
c
are
i*en b( 5inear Elasticit( 'heor($ which are$ in the
case of MP'$ the solution of E3.@.
'he stabilit( %roblem consists in determinin the linear
load %arameter z and dis%lacement fields$ ou
c
$
cinematicall( admissible$ which satisf( the followin
e3uationA
_os
6
1
o
M

U
J0 +z _
U

os
NL
o
m
c]
(ou
c]
)

J0 =
_ou
c
1
J
reJ
U
J0 +_ ou
c
1
t
reJ
U
2
J o0
2
.
E*$-
"f z is below z
c
$ the dis%lacement field is uni3ue. 9hen
z increases and reaches z
c
$ the dis%lacement field is
no loner uni3ue$ i.e. for z = z
c
buc#lin ma( occur a
bifurcation$ which means that a reference structure
confiuration and an infinitesimall( close (buc#led!
confiuration are both %ossible at the same load ;><=.
@
Aeronautic Com%onent O%timi&ation 9ith 8on.Smooth 6uc#lin 5oad Criterion
JoFo Cam%os 8o*ember >1<>
8ote that os
6
1
onl( includes the first.order strains
associated with the %late deformation. 'he nonlinear
term (i.e. the second term in E3.D! re%resents the wor#
done b( membrane forces (%er unit lenth! and
membrane strains associated with a small lateral
deflection (small %erturbation!. 'he small %erturbation of
the e3uilibrium confiuration (i.e. dis%lacements
associated with a small lateral %late deflection! is lin#ed
to second order membrane strains i*en b( ;>>=A
e
xx
NL
= 1 2 / (u
,x
2
+ :
,x
2
+ w
,x
2
);
e

NL
= 1 2 / (u
,
2
+ :
,
2
+ w
,
2
);
y
x
NL
= u
,x
u
,
+ :
,x
:
,
+ w
,x
w
,
,
s
6
NL
= {e
xx
NL
, e

NL
, y
x
NL
] .
E*$.
8ote that$ in this anal(sis$ the second order shear
strains y
z
and y
xz
are discarded. 'he membrane forces
%er unit lenth o
m
c]
$ corres%ond to an initial or
reference stress state. 'his initial state corres%onds to
an e3uilibrium confiuration of the structure (ou
c]
! that
satisfies the e3uilibrium (i.e. ou
c]
is solution of E3.@!$
when sub+ected to a load reference.
&$( 'INITE ELEMENT DISCRETIZATION
6( means of finite element a%%roximation$ E3.D can be
stated s(mbolicall( as the enerali&ed eien*alue
%roblem$
(K(x) + z

K
c
(x, U)) 1

= ,
E*$/
"n this %roblem$ 1

re%resents the eien*ector or mode$


K and K
c
denote the stiffness and eometric matrices$
res%ecti*el(. x re%resents the *ector of the desin
*ariables that are assumed to be constant for each
finite element. Lector U is the fundamental
dis%lacement$ which is the solution of a finite element
a%%roximation of the linear elasto.static %roblem$
K(x) U = R E*$0
where R is the load *ector. 'he enerali&ed eien*alue
%roblem is sol*ed b( the subs%ace iteration method
usin the S%arse E3uation method ;>0=.
($ OPTIMIZATION O' LINEAR BUCKLING
PROBLEMS AND DESIGN SENSITI%IT)
ANAL)SIS
'he o%timi&ation %roblem is stated as material
distribution$ *ar(in the elements thic#ness x
]
with
] = 1, ., N$ so that critical buc#lin load is maximi&ed. 'o
limit the amount of total a*ailable material *olume$ an
u%%er bound on *olume is introduced. Assumin that
the buc#lin load factors are %ositi*e$ different from
&ero and numbered such that u < z
1
z
2
. z

$ the
critical load factor is defined b( z
c
= z
1
. 9ith this
notation the o%timi&ation %roblem can be stated as
mox
x
]
_min
r
z

] min _
1
z
c
] ;
E*$#1
sub+ected toA
Lolume constrainsA
:
c
n
c=1
I
ntuI
; E*$##

'hic#ness bound constraintsA
x
]
mn
x
]
x
]
mux
, ] = 1, ., N; E*$#&
E3uilibrium e3uation (E3.I! which characteri&es
the fundamental dis%lacement field7
Stabilit( e3uation (E3.H! which characteri&es
the critical buc#lin load factor$ z
c
$ and the
mode 1

.
'he o%timi&ation %roblem %re*iousl( laid out is sol*ed
b( the Method of Mo*in As(m%totes (MMA!. 'he
documentation of the alorithm lies in se*eral S*anber
%ublications ;>@$ >C$ >D=.
($# DESIGN SENSITI%IT) ANAL)SIS O' SIMPLE
EIGEN%ALUES
'he radients are calculated from the direct
differentiation and the ad+oint method. 'he deri*ation of
sensiti*ities of sim%le eien*alues is made for finite
element e3uations. 'he sensiti*it( of a sim%le
eien*alue is the deri*ati*e of z

with res%ect to desin


*ariables x
]
. Pre.multi%l(in E3.H b( 1

1
$ the deri*ati*e
of z

isA
Jz

Jx
]
=
J
Jx
]
_
1

1
K1

1
K
c
1

_ E*$#(
A%%l(in the 3uotient rule deri*ati*e$ and assumin that
the eien*ectors are normali&ed with res%ect to K
c
$ i.e.$
1

1
K
c
1

= 1$ we ha*e (see references ;I$ >E=! A


Jz

Jx
]
= _1

1
JK
Jx
]
1

1
JK
c
Jx
]
1

_,
E*$#+
'he deri*ati*e of the stiffness matrix and the initial
stress matrix (i.e. JK Jx
]
/ and JK
c
Jx
]
/ ! are determined
anal(ticall( at the finite element le*el. 'he deri*ati*e of
the stiffness matrix with res%ect to thic#ness$ JK Jx
]
/ is
tri*ial$ since JK Jx
]
/ de%ends on thic#ness ex%licitl(.
'he initial stress matrix$ K
c
$ is a function that de%ends
on thic#ness ex%licitl( and im%licitl( throuh the
dis%lacement field$ i.e. K
c
= K
c
(U(t), t). Accordin to
the nomenclature of the ad+oint method$ if 1

1
K
o
U
1

is
the ad+oint force$ R
ud]
$ then the ad+oint *ariable$ F
ud]
$ is
defined as ;I=A
F
ud]
_1

1
oK
c
oU
1

K
-1
]
1
= K
-1
_1

1
oK
c
oU
1

]
1
.
E*$#,
'his definition ma#es use of the s(mmetr( %ro%ert( of
the stiffness matrix K. 'he calculation of the ad+oint
*ariable re3uires the in*ersion of matrix$ i.e. K
-1
.
/owe*er$ this in*ersion is com%utationall( too
ex%ensi*e. Multi%l(in both sides of the e3uation b( K$
the ad+oint %roblem similar to static anal(sis with finite
element a%%roximation is obtainedA
K F
ud]
= R
ud]
.
E*$#-
C
Aeronautic Com%onent O%timi&ation 9ith 8on.Smooth 6uc#lin 5oad Criterion
JoFo Cam%os 8o*ember >1<>
9e chose to sol*e the %roblem in $ata!
,
usin the
command ?mldi*ide M?. 'he calculation of initial stress
matrix sensiti*it( usin the ad+oint *ariable isA
1

1
JK
c
Jx
]
1

= _1

1
oK
c
ox
]
1

F
ud]
1
JK
Jx
]
U_. E*$#.
)inall($ introducin E3.<E into E3.<@$ the sensiti*it( of
the sim%le eien*alue is i*en b(A
Jz

Jx
]
= 1

1
JK
Jx
]
1

+ z

_1

1
oK
c
ox
]
1

F
ud]
1
JK
Jx
]
U_. E*$#/
'he ob+ecti*e function is the in*erse of z

(see E3.<1!.
'herefore$ we calculate the sensiti*it( of the ob+ecti*e
function usin the 3uotient deri*ati*e ruleA
J
Jx
]
_
1
z

] =
1
z

2
Jz

Jx
]
. E*$#0
Bntil now$ the sensiti*it( was deri*ed for sinle
eien*alues. 9hen there are re%eated eien*alues$ the
ob+ecti*e function is not differentiated. "n order to
o*ercome this difficult($ an auxiliar( routine based on
the -enerali&ed -radient conce%t ;>H= is introduced$
whose mathematical formulation is %resented in the
next section.
($& DESIGN SENSITI%IT) ANAL)SIS O'
MULTIPLE EIGEN%ALUES
'his -enerali&ed -radient techni3ue was %re*iousl(
used for dimensional o%timi&ation of %lates and beams
with critical buc#lin load criterion b( )olado and
Godriues ;<>= and Godriues et al. ;>E=.
5et consider a eneral iteration ?k?. At this iteration it is
necessar( to define the decreasin direction of the
ob+ecti*e function in the current desin. 'o characteri&e
that direction let e > u be a small number defined b( the
user (e.. e = u.uS! and let m
s
$ which we will call e.
multi%licit( of z
c
$ be e3ual to the number of
eien*alues satisf(in the ine3ualit(A
(z

z
c
) e z
c
. E*$&1
After definin this criterion$ sub.radients$ Jz

Jx
]
/ $
which satisf( the %re*ious condition (i.e. Jz

Jx
]
/ with
r = 1,2, . . . , m
s
! are calculated. 9ith the sub.radients$ a
con*ex s%ace w is constructed ;>I=A
w = co _J
g
=

J z

Jx
]

m
s
=1

u c

= 1
m
s
=1
. E*$&#
'he descent direction of the ob+ecti*e function is i*en
b( *ector J
g

,$ which belons to w$ and whose norm is


minimum. J
g

is calculated b( formulatin the followin


minimi&ation %roblem ;01$ 0<=A
J
g

2

= min
J
g
w
J
g

2

.
E*$&&
"f u w$ then J
g

= u$ and there is no descent direction$


l(in in the ob+ecti*e function in a stationar( %oint.
/owe*er$ note that J
g

u does not im%l( that desin


%oint x
]

is not a stationar( %oint$ since w is an


a%%roximation of the radient. 'he %roblem of
minimi&in the J
g
norm was sol*ed usin the fmincon
function in $ata!
,
. 'he alorithm used to sol*e the
%roblem is the interior %oint (see references ;0>$ 00=!.
($( OPTIMIZATION SCHEME
'he o%timi&ation scheme uses the commercial finite
element software Ansys
,
to obtain the linear elastic
stabilit( res%onse$ namel( the dis%lacement field U$ the
critical load factors z

and the res%ecti*e eien*ectors


1

. 'he MMA a%%roach was ado%ted to sol*e the


o%timi&ation %roblem. 'he o%timi&ation method
im%lemented in this wor# is re%resented b( the
flowchart in )iure <.
'he code built consists of the interface written in
$ata!
#
lin#in the finite element %roram Ansys
#
and
MMA in its *ersion of $ata!
,
. 'he *alue of the
ob+ecti*e function$ the constraints and sensiti*ities are
in%utted to MMA alorithm$ which calculates a new
desin %oint and the new structural res%onse (critical
loads$ buc#lin modes$ dis%lacements! is aain
obtained with Ansys
#
. 'he solution is con*ered if the
con*erence criterion is *erified$ i.e.A
z
1
=
z
1
z

z
1
< . E*$&(
where is defined b( the user.
+$ RESULTS
'he o%timi&ation method was *alidated throuh some
benchmar# exam%les$ namel($ beam and %lates
buc#lin o%timi&ation and it was *erified that results are
in ood areement with theoretical and Ansys
#

o%timi&ation results. 9e %resent here the case of

'234re # - I567e5e8te" !6t2529at2!8 sc:e5e$
D
Aeronautic Com%onent O%timi&ation 9ith 8on.Smooth 6uc#lin 5oad Criterion
JoFo Cam%os 8o*ember >1<>
clam%ed (fixed! . clam%ed (slidin! beam$ for which the
o%timi&ed solution is #nown as bein bi.modal ;0@=.
+$# BEAM OPTIMIZATION
'he structure consists on a beam com%osed b( a finite
number of sements$ N$ with uniform sections and
e3ual lenth. 'he oal of the o%timi&ation %roblem is to
identif( the thic#nesses of each (%iecewise! section
x
]
, ] = 1, . . . , N$ to maximi&e the critical load (ob+ecti*e
function! considerin the *olume constraints.

'234re & - '282te e7e5e8t 5es: !; bea5$
)iure > shows a beam di*ided into >1 e3ual sections
(N = 2u!. 'he initial thic#ness$ uniforml( distributed
alon the beam$ is x
]
= u.1 m and sectional area is
(x) = u.u m
2
. 'he material %ro%erties are constantA
NounOs modulus is = 2uu o and PoissonOs ratio is
: = u.S. 'he beam section width is constant and e3ual
for all sectionsA b = u.m. 'he beam lenth is l = 1u m
and the lenth of each section is l

= l N / = u. m.
)or the followin exam%les$ we introduce here the
Critical 5oad O%timi&ation )actor (! in order to
com%are the efficienc( of o%timal solutions concernin
initial buc#lin load. 'his factor is defined as the ratio
between the o%timi&ed critical load$ z
t
$ and the initial
critical load$ z
ntuI
$ i.e. = z
t
z
ntuI
.
'he o%timi&ation %roblem was sol*ed b( the alorithm
described in the %re*ious section. 'he o%timi&ation
%roblem is stated b( E3.<1 to E3.<>. 'he lower bound
for desin *ariables is x
]
mn
= 1u
-
.
'he same %roblem was also sol*ed in Ansys
#
usin its
)irst Order O%timi&ation Method ()S'OP'! to
determine the o%timum desin %oint. )S'OP' uses
finite differences to a%%roximate radients which ma#es
the alorithm slower.
)iure 0 shows e*olution alon the o%timi&ation
%rocess in Ansys
#
()S'OP'! and with MMA$ where we
can see faster con*erence with MMA.

a< b<
'234re ( - a< 'STOPT c!8=er3e8ce> b< MMA c!8=er3e8ce$
'he buc#lin modes for the o%timum solution were
illustrated in )iure @$ where we can see a s(mmetric
and an anti.s(mmetric modes.




'234re + - B4c?7283 5!"es ;!r !6t2545 s!74t2!8$

'he obtained thic#ness distribution is the illustrated in
)iure C.

'234re , - T:2c?8ess "2str2b4t2!8$
'o com%are results$ the o%timum solution of the Euler.
6ernoulli beam is also %resented. 6imodal solutions for
elastic columns are described in Olhoff and Gasmussen
;0@=. )or a sectional relation of (x) = c (x)

$ bimodal
solution was obtained b( Atanac#o*ic e Alexander ;0C=.
Tab7e # - B4c?7283 L!a" C!56ar2s!8$
I82t2a7 MMA Ansys


E47er-Ber8!4772
s!74t2!8 @(,A

1
N S SS. .9 S2. .

2
N 77u.S SS.1 .
. 1.S8871 1.S81
. 82 ( n
2
) /
= 1.S887
)rom 'able < can be seen that is *er( close to
the one deri*ed anal(ticall( in ;0C=.
+$& PARAMETRIC STUD) O' IMPER'ECTION
SENSITI%IT) IN A BEAM WITH REPEATED BUCKLING
LOADS
Structural o%timi&ation ma( %roduce coincident buc#lin
modes$ which is sometimes mentioned as *er(
sensiti*e to im%erfections. 'his %henomenon is called
modes interaction and is associated with the
simultaneous occurrence (or nearl(! of more than one
mode. Conse3uentl( the load at the first limit %oint of an
im%erfect structure is considerabl( lower than the
bifurcation load of the %erfect structure ;<@$ <C$ <D$ <E=.
One a%%roach$ that allows for the im%erfections4 effect
to be included$ is based on numericall( trac#in of the
e3uilibrium %ath of the im%erfect structure before the
limit %oint. 'his method is *er( useful$ but it re3uires a
se%arate anal(sis for each manitude and im%erfection
t(%e. "n this wor#$ the 3uestion is restricted onl( to a
%arametric stud( of critical load sensiti*it( due to a
trans*erse disturbance on a beam clam%ed.clam%ed
slidin.
'he clam%ed (fixed! . clam%ed (slidin! beam is illus.
trated in )iure D. "t is axiall( loaded (! and the onl(
t(%e of im%erfections is a trans*erse load (p! at mid.
s%an.

'234re - - I56er;ect2!8 28tr!"4ce" by a s5a77 tra8s=erse 7!a"$
'he ob+ecti*es of this stud( areA
to *erif( the ?im%erfect structure? sensiti*it( in the
o%timum solutions7
to chec# the structure sensiti*it( due to the
%roximit( between the lowest bifurcation load
factors$ i.e.$ if there is hiher sensiti*it( when
critical loads are re%eated or closed7
to *erif( the influence of the trans*erse load
intensit( in the limit load.
E
Aeronautic Com%onent O%timi&ation 9ith 8on.Smooth 6uc#lin 5oad Criterion
JoFo Cam%os 8o*ember >1<>
"n this wa($ the stud( consists of two ste%sA one is linear
buc#lin o%timi&ation in order to et a beam with
re%eated and closed buc#lin loads7 the other one is the
nonlinear anal(sis in order to et the e3uilibrium %ath of
the %erturbed structure$ before the limit %oint.
+$&$# OPTIMIZATION RESULTS
'he o%timi&ation %roblem is stated b( E3.<1 to E3.<>.
"t was sol*ed in Ansys
#
with the )irst Order
O%timi&ation Method ()S'OP'!. An additional
constraint is im%osed to limit the two lowest critical load
factors %roximit($ i.e.$ for z
1
< z
2
we ha*eA
_
z
2
z
1
z
1
] > _. E*$&+
'he %arameter _ *aries from &ero throuh _ = u.u$
_ = u.1 and _ = u.S. 9hen _ = u one obtains a
bi.modal solution.
'he critical loads resultin from linear stabilit(
o%timi&ation are shown in 'able >.
Tab7e & - O6t25a7 b4c?7283 7!a"s 28 ;48ct2!8 !; $
= = . 5 = . 1 = . 3

1
N S2. S1. 1u.2 19.7

1
Pecrease . u.u2 % u.8 % 2.S %

2
N SS.1 92.9 1u8.7 1u7.8
As shown in 'able >$
1
decreases with increasin _.
a< b<
'234re . - a< CLOF c!8=er3e8ce 2t: = > b< CLOF c!8=er3e8ce
2t: = . 5$
)iure E a! shows e*olution alon the
o%timi&ation %rocess in Ansys
#
with _ = u and )iure E
b! shows the same e*olution but with _ = u.u.
a<
b<
'234re / - a< CLOF c!8=er3e8ce 2t: = . 1> b< CLOF
c!8=er3e8ce 2t: = . 3$
)iure H a! shows the e*olution alon the
o%timi&ation %rocess in Ansys
#
with _ = u.1 and )iure
H b! shows the same e*olution but with _ = u.S. 'he
distance between the first and second cur*es in the
final solution is clearl( *isible.
+$&$& NONLINEAR ANAL)SIS
"n nonlinear stabilit( anal(sis$ a trans*erse load (p! at
mid.s%an was introduced$ with the intensit( p = 1 N$
as shown in )iure D. 'hus$ the trans*erse load
(p = 1 N! has a relati*e intensit( of u.uu22 % about

1
. "n a second stud($ the trans*erse load p = 1u N
was introduced$ which corres%onds to a relati*e
intensit( of u.u22 %.
"n nonlinear anal(sis$ axial loadin was *aried form u %
to 11u % of the o%timum critical load (
1
= S2.!.
'his *alue of 11u% was established with the aim of
anal(&in the beha*ior after the bifurcation$ if it exists.
'he loadin was di*ided into uu e3uall( s%aced
increments. 9ith nonlinear anal(sis$ e3uilibrium %ath of
the %erturbed structure is trac#ed$ before the limit %oint.
"n order to com%are the efficienc( of %re*ious o%timum
solutions (see 'able >! the 8onlinear Critical 5oad
)actor (N! was used. 'he factor is defined as the
ratio between the a%%lied load on nonlinear anal(sis$
z
NL
$ and the o%timum critical load (z
t
=
1
with
_ = u! i.e. N = z
NL
z
t
.

'234re 0 - E*4272br245 6at: !; bea5 2t: # KN tra8s=erse 7!a"$
)iure I shows the diaram of N *ersus axial
dis%lacement for an a%%lied disturbance p = 1u N. "t
can be obser*ed that the end %oint of each e3uilibrium
cur*e decreases as _ increases and there is no
increase of resistance after buc#lin or$ when it exists
(for _ = u.S! $ it is small. )or _ = u the critical load was
decreased 1.u% and for _ = u.u was decreased
1.7%. )or _ = u.2$ critical load diminished 1.8% and
for _ = u.S it diminished 18.2%.

'234re #1 - E*4272br245 6at: !; bea5 2t: #1 KN tra8s=erse 7!a"$
)iure <1 shows the diaram of N *ersus axial
dis%lacement for an a%%lied disturbance p = 1u N. )or
_ = u and _ = u.u was obtained a 17.9% decrease of
the critical load for _ = u.1 it was obser*ed a decrease
of 18.% and for _ = u.S it was 17.S%.
H
Aeronautic Com%onent O%timi&ation 9ith 8on.Smooth 6uc#lin 5oad Criterion
JoFo Cam%os 8o*ember >1<>
+$&$( RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
-i*en these results$ it can be concluded that$ in this
structure$ sensiti*it( to trans*ersal loads in the *arious
o%timi&ed solutions exists$ once critical load decreases
between <D2 and <H2.
"t seems that the structure sensiti*it( to trans*erse
%erturbations does not *ar( with %roximit( between the
first bifurcation loads. Also in the nonlinear anal(sis$ the
trend obser*ed in 'able > remains$ i.e. limit %oint
decreases with increasin _$ with exce%tion for _ = u.S
where the %ost.buc#lin has some resistance increase.
So$ it can be stated that$ critical load %roximit( did not
show to be more sensiti*e to %erturbations in these
cases.
)urthermore$ inde%endentl( of the intensit( of p$ it is
obser*ed that _ = u solution has a hiher limit %oint$
which indicates that %erturbation intensit( seems not
brin critical load sensiti*it( due to %roximit(:re%etition
critical loads. /owe*er$ critical load sensiti*it( de%ends
on p intensit(. More s%ecificall($ increasin the
trans*ersal disturbance 9uu% (p %asses from 1 N to
1u N! the critical load decreased about 1.9% for
o%timum solution with _ = u.
+$( OPTIMIZATION O' A SIMPLI'IED
AERONAUTIC COMPONENT
As mentioned abo*e$ in structures where nonlinearities
are rele*ant$ linear stabilit( anal(sis and critical Euler
load o%timi&ation ma( not be a%%ro%riate. /owe*er$ in
some cases there is a h(%othesis of eometr( and
loadin sim%lification so that the %roblem com%lies with
the necessar( conditions to stud( the stabilit( with
linear a%%roach. 'he %ur%ose of this section is to test$
usin nonlinear stabilit( anal(sis$ if the critical load
increases after o%timi&ation of critical load. 'o o%timi&e
the buc#lin load it was necessar( to sim%lif( eometr(
(%lannin! and loads (onl( membrane forces are
a%%lied! to chec# the linear stabilit( conditions.
'he methodolo( used in this section consists of a
se3uence of ste%s which are outlined in )iure <<.
'he methodolo( is a%%lied to a structural model based
on A0>1:6E0E win with 9hitcomb su%ercritical airfoil.
'he internal structure is in areement with the
constraints resultin from structural drawins. 'he
aerod(namic loadin is related to fliht at Mach 1.E$
<<111 meters altitude and > derees of anle of attac#.
"nitiall($ a nonlinear stabilit( anal(sis of aircraft structure
(win! is %erformed loball($ with the aim of identif(in
local instabilities. 5ater$ a com%onent %resentin local
instabilities (i.e. one %anel! in the former anal(sis is
selected. "n order to maximi&e the linear buc#lin load
factor the %roblem was sim%lified$ i.e.$ onl( membrane
forces are a%%lied and the %anel was flattened. )inall($
the o%timal %anel thic#ness was u%dated in the o*erall
structure (win!. Aain$ a nonlinear anal(sis was
%erformed to com%are the load.dis%lacement diaram
and the *alue of the first load branch. 'he followin
section %resents some details on the abo*e mentioned
ste%s.
+$($# NONLINEAR STABILIT) ANAL)SIS
Purin nonlinear anal(sis$ althouh chane in stiffness
is ta#en into account$ due to deformation$ there is no
chane in the aerod(namic loadin$ which means that
load is sim%lified. 'o sol*e the nonlinear e3uations$ the
8ewton.Ga%hson method is used. "n this method the
load is incrementall( a%%lied and in this %roblem it was
di*ided into >C e3uall( s%aced increments. 'he
a%%lication of load is referenced to the win loadin
factor (w! defined asA
w =
pplicJ looJ
ligbt looJing conJition

E*$&,
'he incremental load is a%%lied on the nodes *ar(in
from w = u to w = 1.2.

'234re #& - U66er s4r;ace 283 6a8e7s c:aracter29e" by 7!ca7
b4c?7283$
'he first buc#lin modes corres%ond to u%%er surface
win %anel indicated b( the circle in )iure <>$ is shown
in )iure <0 for different w.

a< b<
'234re #( - a< Pa8e7 7!ca7 b4c?7283 2t: WLF = . 2> b< Pa8e7 7!ca7
b4c?7283 2t: WLF = . 2$
"n )iure <0 a!$ with w = u.u2 buc#lin deformation
is characteri&ed b( one wa*e and b( a maximum

'234re ## - A8a7ys2s a8" !6t2529at2!8 ;7!c:art$
I
Aeronautic Com%onent O%timi&ation 9ith 8on.Smooth 6uc#lin 5oad Criterion
JoFo Cam%os 8o*ember >1<>
dis%lacement at node >1CD0. As we can see for
w = u.2 the buc#lin deformation has one wa*e too.
"n the followin section$ the o%timi&ation method
described abo*e is a%%lied to the isolated %anel.
+$($& LINEAR BUCKLING PANEL OPTIMIZATION
"n order to simulate the beha*ior of the %anel
embedded in the win$ the boundar( conditions that
allow extremities rotation without allowin axial
dis%lacements are a%%lied.
'o obtain the linear stabilit( conditions$ it was
necessar( to ma#e two sim%lifications in the %anelA onl(
membrane forces were a%%lied and the %anel was
flattened. 'hus$ the stabilit( res%onse was studied b(
usin the Euler a%%roach$ i.e. usin E3.H.
Membrane efforts were ta#en from a nonlinear anal(sis
with w = u.u. 9ith this$ buc#lin deformation in
nonlinear anal(sis is similar to buc#lin mode that
becomes with linear stabilit( anal(sis. 'hus$ the
lineari&ed %roblem consists of tra%e&oidal %late with
uniform section and constants and homoeneous
material %ro%erties$ which has 9 elements. NounOs
modulus is = 7u o and PoissonOs ratio is : = u.S.
'he oal is to determine the thic#nesses distribution x
]

in order to maximi&e the critical load. 'he minimum
allowable thic#ness is x
]
mn
= 1u
-
m and the maximum
is x
]
mux
= 8 1u
-
m. 'he initial *olume is
I
ntuI
= u.u1uS78 m

. )iure <@ shows the e*olution


of the in*erse of the ob+ecti*e function throuhout the
o%timi&ation %rocess.

'234re #+ - B4c?7283 cr2t2ca7 7!ca" c!8=er3e8ce 2t: MMA$
After u iterations$ critical load increases S8.2%. 'he
three lines in )iure <C re%resent the e*olution of the
first$ second and third critical buc#lin load factors with
the iterations.
+$($( NONLINEAR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
After linear buc#lin o%timi&ation$ %anel thic#ness was
u%dated on win model. A new nonlinear stabilit(
anal(sis was %erformed. "n this anal(sis$ the
assum%tions and sim%lifications are the same as with
the first nonlinear anal(sis. 'he load was di*ided in the
same number of increments and the method to sol*e
nonlinear e3uations was also 8ewton.Ga%hson method.
Com%arison of results is made b( a load.dis%lacement
diaram on node >1CD> (see location of the nodes in
)iure <0!$ where the trans*ersal dis%lacement is
maximum.

'234re #- - L!a"-"2s67ace5e8t tra8s=erse !8 8!"e &1,-&$
)rom )iure <D$ it can be seen that nonlinear anal(sis
showed the first bifurcation load Su% hiher than the
bifurcation load obtained with non.o%timi&ed structure.
More s%ecificall($ in the o%timi&ed structure w
bifurcation %oint is u.1 while in the non.o%timi&ed
structure w bifurcation %oint is u.1192. Moreo*er$ for
the same load$ dis%lacement after and before
bifurcation is reduced.
"t can be concluded that the wor#in h(%otheses do not
sinificantl( %enali&e the o%timi&ation results because
the %anel was slihtl( cur*ed and because nonlinear
beha*ior in the %re.buc#lin confiuration is not *er(
%ronounced before the bifurcation %oint (see$ in )iure
<D$ where the e3uilibrium %ath before the bifurcation is
a%%roximatel( linear!. More s%ecificall($ after
o%timi&ation of stabilit( in linear reime$ the w
bifurcation %oint corres%onds to S8.2% increase and in
nonlinear anal(sis that increase became Su%.
,$ 'INAL CONCLUSIONS
As a eneral conclusion$ it can be stated that in the
u%%er win %anel exam%le$ characteri&ed b( local
buc#lin$ the linear buc#lin o%timi&ation was able to
%roduce a critical load increasin as was chec#ed
throuh a nonlinear anal(sis. "t can be concluded that in
this case the assum%tions and sim%lifications
considered do not sinificantl( %enali&e the o%timi&ation
results$ since the %anel is slihtl( cur*ed and because
nonlinear beha*ior in the %re.buc#lin confiuration is
not *er( %ronounced before the bifurcation %oint.
Since linear buc#lin o%timi&ation does not enable
inclusion of im%erfections effects$ im%erfection effects
on a clam%ed.clam%ed beam were addressed here$
where a trans*erse load at the mid.s%an is a%%lied. )or
that exam%le$ critical load sensiti*it( due to the
%roximit( between the lowest buc#lin load was not
*erified.
-$ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
" am *er( rateful to Professor Miuel Matos 8e*es and
Professor Maria Alexandra -omes for their a*ailabilit(
durin the orientation of m( dissertation.
" am also than#ful to Professor Qrister S*anber for
%ro*idin his $ata!
#
*ersion of the Method of Mo*in
As(m%totes.
" than# Gicardo Pai*a for (ieldin a win model written
in APP5.
<1
Aeronautic Com%onent O%timi&ation 9ith 8on.Smooth 6uc#lin 5oad Criterion
JoFo Cam%os 8o*ember >1<>
.$ RE'ERENCES

;<= J. C. 9illiams and E. A. Star#e Jr$ ?Proress in structural
materials for aeros%ace s(stems$? Acta $aterialia, *ol. C<$ no.
<I$ %%. CEEC.CEII$ 8o*ember >110.
;>= S. 'imoshen#o and J. -ere$ 'heor( of Elastic Stabilit($ Mc-raw.
/ill$ <ID0.
;0= E. 5indaard and 5. Eri#$ ?8onlinear buc#lin o%timi&ation of
com%osite structures$? %omputer $ethods in Applied $echanics
and &ngineering, *ol. <II$ no. 0E.@1$ %%. >0<I.>001$ Aosto
>1<1.
;@= E. 5indaard and E. 5und$ ?A unified a%%roach to nonlinear
buc#lin o%timi&ation of com%osite structures$? %omputers '
Structures, *ol. HI$ no. 0.@$ %%. 0CE.0E1$ )e*ereiro >1<1.
;C= E. 5indaard and E. 5und$ ?O%timi&ation of Com%osite Structures
considerin 5ocal 6uc#lin$? in I( &uropean %onference on
%omputational $echanics$ Paris$ )rance$ >1<1.
;D= E. 5indaard$ E. 5und and Q. Gasmussen$ ?8onlinear buc#lin
o%timi&ation of com%osite structures considerin RRworstS sha%e
im%erfections$? International )ournal of Solids and Structures, *ol.
@E$ no. >>.>0$ %%. 0<HI.0>1>$ >1<1.
;E= E. 5und and E. 5indaard$ ?8on.linear 6uc#lin Multi.Material
'o%olo( O%timi&ation includin ?worst? Sha%e "m%erfections$? in
*+th International %onference on %omposite $aterials$ Paris$
)rance$ >1<1.
;H= S. Gahmatalla and C. Swan$ ?Continuum 'o%olo( O%timi&ation
of 6uc#lin Sensiti*e Structures$? AIAA )ournal, *ol. @<$ no. D$
%%. <<H1.<<HI$ >110.
;I= M. M. 8e*es$ /. C. Godriues and J. M. -uedes$ ?-enerali&ed
to%olo( desin of structures with a buc#lin load criterion$?
Structural ,ptimi-ation, *ol. <1$ no. >$ %%. E<.EH$ <IIC.
;<1= M. Jhou$ ?'o%olo( O%timi&ation for Shell Structures with 5inear
6uc#lin Ges%onses$? in (I .orld %omputational %ongress
$echanics in con/unction 0ith AP%,$123$ 6ei+in$ China$ >11@.
;<<= M. 6endsoe and O. Simund$ 'o%olo( O%timi&ation. 'heor(
Methods and A%%lications$ S%riner$ >11>.
;<>= J. )olado and /. Godriues$ ?Structural O%timi&ation with a
8on.Smooth 6uc#lin 5oad Criterion$? %ontrol and %y!ernetics,
*ol. >E$ no. >$ %%. >0C.>C0$ <IIH.
;<0= M. M. 8e*es$ /. C. Godriues and J. M. -uedes$ ?O%timal
Pesin of Periodic 5inear Elastic Microstructures$? %omputers
and Structures, *ol. ED$ no. <.0$ %%. @><.@>I$ >111.
;<@= P. /o$ ?6uc#lin load of nonlinear s(stems with multi%le
eien*alues$? International )ournal of Solids and Structures, *ol.
<1$ no. <<$ %%. <0<C.<001$ <IE@.
;<C= Q. /use(in$ 8onlinear 'heor( of Elastic Stabilit($ 8oordhoff$
5e(denA S%riner$ <IEC$ %. >@>.
;<D= J. /utchinson and C. Ama&io$ ?"m%erfection.sensiti*it( of
eccentricall( stiffened c(lindrical shells$? )" AIAA, *ol. C$ no. 0$
%%. 0I>.@1<$ <IDE.
;<E= J. 'hom%son and -. /unt$ A -eneral 'heor( of Elastic Stabilit($
8ew$Nor#A J. 9ile($ <IE0$ %. 0>>.
;<H= Q. J. 6athe$ )inite Element Procedures in Enineerin Anal(sis$
8ew Jerse(A Prentice./all$ <IH>.
;<I= J. Gedd($ Mechanics of 5aminated Com%osite Plates and ShellsA
theor( and anal(sis$ > ed.$ CGC Press$ >11@.
;>1= G. Coo#$ P. Mal#us$ M. Plesha and G. 9itt$ Conce%ts and
A%%lications of )inite Element Anal(sis$ @ ed.$ John 9ile( T
Sons$ >11>.
;><= M. 5. -ambhir$ Stabilit( Anal(sis and Pesin of Structures$
-erman(A S%riner$ >11@.
;>>= G. <. A8SNS, Academic Gesearch$ ? /el% S(stem :: 'heor(
Geference :: 0. Structures with -eometric 8onlinearities :: 0.@.
Stress Stiffenin?.
;>0= G. <. A8SNS, Academic Gesearch$ ?A8SNS, <@.1 /el% ::
'heor( Geference :: <C. Anal(sis 'ools :: <C.<D. Eien*alue and
Eien*ector Extraction?.
;>@= Q. S*anber$ ?A class of loball( con*erent o%timi&ation
methods based on conser*ati*e con*e& se%arable
a%%roximations$? Society for Industrial and Applied $athematics
)ournal ,ptimi-ation, *ol. <>$ no. >$ %%. CCC.CE0$ >11>.
;>C= Q. S*anber$ ?MMA and -CMMA$ *ersions Setember >11E$?
O%timi&ation and S(stems 'heor($ Q'/$ Stoc#holm$ Sweden.
;>D= Q. S*anber$ ?'he Method of Mo*in As(m%totes . A new
method for structural o%timi&ation$? International )ournal for
4umerical $ethods in &ngineering, *ol. >@$ no. >$ %%. 0CI.0E0$
<IHE.
;>E= /. C. Godriues$ J. M. -uedes and M. P. 6endsoe$ ?8ecessar(
conditions for o%timal desin structures with non smooth
eien*alue based criterion$? Structural ,ptimi-ation, *ol. I$ %%.
C>.CD$ <IIC.
;>H= ). Clar#$ O%timi&ation and 8on.Smooth Anal(sis$ 8ew Nor#A
9ile(."nterscience Publication$ <IH0.
;>I= M. M. 8e*es$ O. Simund and M. P. 6endsoe$ ?'o%olo(
o%timi&ation of %eriodic microstructures with a %enali&ation of
hihl( locali&ed buc#lin modes$? International )ournal for
4umerical $ethods in &ngineering, *ol. C@$ no. D$ %%. H1I.H0@$
>11>.
;01= L. PemO(ano* and L. Malo&emo*$ "ntroduction to Minimax$ 8ew
Nor#A Po*er Publications$ <II1.
;0<= Q. Qiwiel$ Methods of Pescent for 8ondifferentiable O%timi&ation$
6erlinA S%riner$ <IHC.
;0>= G. A. 9alt&$ J. 5. Morales$ J. 8ocedal and P. Orban$ ?An interior
alorithm for nonlinear o%timi&ation that combines line search
and trust reion ste%s$? $athematical Programming, *ol. <1E$ no.
0$ %%. 0I<.@1H$ >11D.
;00= G. /. 6(rd$ E. /. Mar( and J. 8ocedal$ ?An interior Point
Alorithm for 5are.Scale 8onlinear Prorammin$? SIA$
)ournal on ,ptimi-ation, *ol. I$ %%. HEE.I11$ <III.
;0@= 8. Olhoff and S. Gasmussen$ ?On sinle and bimodal o%timum
buc#lin loads of clam%ed columns$? International )ournal of
Solids and Structures, *ol. <0$ %%. D1C.D<@.
;0C= '. M. Atanac#o*ic and A. P. Se(ranian$ ?A%%lication of
Pontr(ain4s %rinci%le to bimodal o%timi&ation %roblems.$?
Structural and $ultidisciplinary ,ptimi-ation, *ol. 0E$ no. <$ %%. <.
<>$ >11H.
;0D= A. Geis and P. Camotim$ Estabilidade Estrutural$ Mc-raw /ill$
>11<.