Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
, P.K. Mukhopadhyay
a
, S. Ayyappan
b
a
Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Kausalyaganga, Bhubaneswar-751 002, Orissa, India
b
Krishi Anusandhan Bhawan-II, ICAR, Pusa, New Delhi-110 012, India
Received 8 November 2006; received in revised form 7 August 2007; accepted 8 August 2007
Abstract
This study was conducted to obtain a database describing the nutritional value of freshwater mixed zooplankton that are widely
used for larval and grow-out rearing of freshwater fish. The macro and micronutrient composition of mixed zooplankton samples
collected from 6 fertilized earthen ponds were analysed for protein, lipid, carbohydrate, ash and these ranged from 7379%, 10.79
14.55%, 34.79% and 3.2010.07%, respectively on a dry matter (DM) basis. Amino acid profile showed the presence of all the
ten essential amino acids with low level of methionine. The content of saturated fatty acids (SAFA), mono unsaturated fatty acids
(MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) ranged from 6481%, 715% and 620% of total fatty acids, respectively. The
predominant fatty acids were SAFA (16:0), MUFA (18:1n-9), PUFA viz. linoleic acid (LA 18:2 n-6) and linolenic acid (LNA 18:3
n-3). Among the vitamins, ascorbic acid (1540.01 g/gDM) was less than the requirement of fish especially for larvae, vitamin-A
(13.6163.95 g/g DM) and vitamin-E (218348g/g DM) were more than the requirement of fish. Mineral and trace element
content showed the presence of P, Ca, Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn. Seasonal variation of all biochemical components was evaluated in the
study. Vitamin E had strong co-relation (r
1
=0.72; r
2
=0.88; r
3
=0.83; r
4
=0.86; r
5
=0.36 and r
6
=0.88) with seasonal variation in
lipid content of zooplankton of different ponds and varied inversely with that of rising temperature. Enzyme content from the
mixed zooplankton of different ponds showed availability of protease (6.217.92 g leucine/ mg protein/h), lipase (25.8239.1 g
-naphthol/mg protein/h) and amylase (100226.1 g maltose/mg protein/h), which could be used as an exogenous source of
digestive enzymes for fish and shellfish during ontogenesis. Absence of l-gulonolactone -oxidase activity confirmed the
incapability of these zooplankton to synthesize ascorbic acid (AA) de novo. The average dry weight in zooplankton in different
ponds was 1.24.2 mg/l and different species present in these ponds were Moina (Moina dubia), Daphnia (Daphnia lumholtzi,
Daphnia carinata); Cyclops (Mesocyclops hyalimus, Mesocyclops leuckarti); Diaptomus (Heliodiaptomus viddus, Neodiaptomus
handeli); Rotifer (Brachionus). These results indicate that the biochemical composition and subsequently the nutritional value of
these planktonic organisms are not only genetically determined but also influenced by its maturity stage and type of ingested food.
These data may be helpful for reference purpose and for formulated feed preparation accessing the nutritional potentiality of these
freshwater zooplankton in the nursery rearing of freshwater fish larvae and early juveniles.
2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Mixed zooplankton; Protein; Lipid; Vitamins; Minerals; Amino acids; Fatty acids and enzymes
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Aquaculture 272 (2007) 346360
www.elsevier.com/locate/aqua-online
Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 674 2465446; fax: +91 674 2465407.
E-mail address: gopamitra@yahoo.com (G. Mitra).
0044-8486/$ - see front matter 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.08.026
1. Introduction
Zooplankton occupy a central position between the
autotrophs and other heterotrophs maintaining an im-
portant link in the sustainability of the food chain form-
ing one of the most important components of freshwater
aquaculture species (Chakrabarti and Sharma, 1998).
Larvae of all cultivable fish species require live plank-
tonic organisms as first food (Garcia-Ortega et al., 1998).
In semi-intensive or intensive culture conditions, aqua-
culture species derive a substantial part of their dietary
nutrient needs from naturally available zooplankton as
they are a valuable source of protein, amino acids, lipid,
fatty acids, vitamins and enzymes (Millamena et al.,
1990; Munilla-Moran et al., 1990; Pillay, 1990; Evjemo
et al., 2001). Thus the relative contributions of zoo-
plankton in the nutrition of freshwater fish larvae have
immense significance (Jana and Chakrabarti, 1993).
Despite the effort that has been put in the development of
formulated starter feed (Verreth et al., 1987) for larval
fish, live food still remains a better option in terms of
survival and growth compared to formulated diet alone.
Live food seems to provide a good source of exogenous
enzymes, and also helps in chemoreception and visual
stimuli (Kolkovski et al., 1995). However, the nutritional
quality of zooplankton varies considerably and thus
plays a major role in producing quality larvae and juve-
niles (van der Meeren et al., 2001) as well as they would
aid in determining the suitability of the organisms in fish
larvae culture (Kibria et al., 1999).
Although in semi-intensive fish culture the cultured
species draws a significant part of nourishment from zoo-
plankton grown in ponds, however quantitation of its
nutritional contribution to fish growth is limited. However
the dependence on live food as starter feed rather than on
formulatedfeedin fish larvae makes it pertinent to evaluate
the nutritional composition of live food in aquaculture
(Srivastava et al., 2006). Due to escalation in the cost of
Artemia cysts, generally used during larval rearing, use
of pond grown zooplankton is justifiably gaining more
importance in the hatcheries in different regions (Evjemo
et al., 2003; Velu and Munuswamy, 2003). However,
colonization of planktonic organism can be found in si-
milar water bodies of different countries (Welch, 1952).
Studies were thus conducted to determine the proximate
composition, content of amino acids, fatty acids, vitamins
(A, C and E), minerals (P, Ca), trace elements (Fe, Cu, Zn,
Mn) and certain metabolic enzymes of mixed zooplankton
from different freshwater fish ponds. Also their nutritional
contribution are evaluated with the aim to consider the
nutritive potentiality of this zooplankton for nursery
rearing of carp larvae and early juveniles.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Pond preparation and collection of samples
Zooplankton samples were collected twice every month
from6 culture ponds (area 0.04 ha, mean depth 1.5 m,) of CIFA
farmat Kausalyaganga, Orissa, India (Lat 20 20 N; Long 85
49 E) for one year. The pre-sampling pond preparation was
carried out for eradication of predatory and undesirable fish
according to Jena et al. (1998). The ponds were dried initially
and exposed to sunlight for eradication of predatory and unde-
sirable fish prior to stocking and filling with canal water filtered
through nylon net (40 mesh) for preventing the entry of pre-
datory species. Pond fertilization was carried out according to
Jena et al. (1998) with application of raw cow dung (0.39% N
and 8.0% C) and super phosphate at 3 tonnes/ha and 7 kg/ha,
respectively, as a basal dose with alternating applications every
fortnight at 1 tonnes/ha/month and 20 kg/ha/month, respec-
tively. Water levels in the ponds were maintained at 1.4 to 1.5 m
throughout the period compensating for seepage and evapora-
tion losses.
The samples were collected between 0800 and 0900 h by
filtering 200 l of water using plankton net made of bolting silk
(0.06 mm mesh size) fromfour sites of each pond with a plastic
container (5 l) from the subsurface (at 0.50.6 m depth) water
with least disturbance. By passing the water of the plastic
container through a net (0.064 mm), the plankton density was
increased (any plankton stuck to the side of the net was washed
down by gently splashing water on the outside of the net) and
transferred to a 10 l plastic container (having 9 l water) through
a 1050 m mesh net (to exclude large predatory insects like
notonectids). Then it was thoroughly mixed to get a represen-
tative of a composite sample of each pond. The samples were
then brought to the laboratory for analysis of nutritive compo-
sition. Prior to analysis of nutritive composition, the plankton
was suspended at a density of 150200 numbers/ml in tap
water in 20 l well aerated glass jars. Dead plankton and organic
debris were removed by siphoning with 2 mm diameter pipe.
Before preparation for biochemical analysis, the samples were
checked for zooplankton viability and no organic debris were
present in the samples. After 24 h the zooplankton samples
were harvested by sieving (through mesh #25 bolting silk) the
water from each glass jar and rinsed in distilled water. After
harvesting some portion of the zooplankton samples were dried
at 60 C to constant weight to determine the dry matter content
from which protein, ash and amino acids were analysed. Sub-
samples of harvested zooplankton were packed and immedi-
ately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 80 C until
analysed for lipid, fatty acids, enzymes and vitamins. From all
samples a known volume was immediately fixed in 4% forma-
lin for quantitative estimation of plankton species.
2.2. Nutrient composition
Dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and ash content were
determined according to the standard methods (AOAC, 1998).
DM content was determined after drying in an oven at 60 C to
347 G. Mitra et al. / Aquaculture 272 (2007) 346360
constant weight and crude protein (CP) content by the Kjeldahl
method and calculated as nitrogen content multiplied by 6.25.
Lipid was analysed using the method of Bligh and Dyer
(1959). Isolated zooplankton was homogenised with 15 ml
chloroform:methanol (2:1 v/v) containing 0.05% butylated
hydroxy toluene (BHT) as an antioxidant in a 20 ml glass
homogenizer. Lipid extracted was re-dissolved in chloroform/
methanol (2:1, v/v containing 0.05% BHT) at a concentration
of 10 mg/ml and stored under nitrogen atmosphere at 20 C
until fatty acid analysis.
Ash content was determined by incinerating dried samples
in muffle furnace at 550 C for 3 h and then preserved for
mineral estimation. Organic matter (OM) was calculated by
subtracting the total ash value from DM. Total carbohydrates
(TCHO) was determined by subtracting CP and lipid values
from OM.
2.3. Amino acid
For amino acid analysis defatted plankton samples were
dried under vacuum in a HPLC work station (Model: 2690) for
30 min (Waters, USA). After purging with nitrogen the sam-
ples were hydrolysed with 6N HCl at 110 C for 20 h under
vacuum. Hydrolysed samples were dried and redried with a
mixture of ethanol:water:triethylamine (TEA) (2:2:1) at
(6586.13/760) N/m
2
. Phenyl isothiocyanate (PITC) deriva-
tives were prepared by adding PITC reagent (ethanolTEA
WaterPITC:: 7:1:1:1) and mixed well and incubated at room
temperature for 30 min, the samples were then allowed to dry
under vacuum. Diluent was added in each sample, which was
then processed for filtration (45 filter paper) and analysed.
Operating condition was: column temperature: 38 C: column:
pico-tag, absorbance 254 nm, pump pressure 1000 psi.
The chemical score (CS) was calculated based on the
limiting essential amino acid in zooplankton multiplied by 100,
where limiting essential amino acid is that which has the
following lowest ratio of essential aminoacid in plankton:
essential amino acid in fish tissue protein (Hepher, 1988). As in
other animals, arginine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine,
methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, tryptophan and valine
were considered the essential amino acids (Tacon and Cowey,
1985). The non-essential amino acids cystine and tyrosine can
only be synthesized by the fish from methionine and phenyla-
lanine, respectively (Tacon and Cowey, 1985). Therefore, the
methionine and phenylalanine requirement of the fish will
partially depend on the cystine and tyrosine content of the diet.
For the calculation of the CS, the values of methionine and
cystine were summed and taken as one essential amino acid in
fish. The same was carried out with phenylalanine and tyrosine.
Tryptophan was not considered in this calculation because it
was not determined.
2.4. Fatty acid
Fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) derivatives of the fatty
acids were prepared by adding 10 ml 20% borontrifluoride
(BF
3
) in methanol to 100 mg lipids and heating for 30 min at
100 C. After cooling, water (same volume as the BF
3
) and
hexane (half the volume of BF
3
) were added, and centrifuged
at 3000 rpm for 5 min. The content of the centrifugation tube
was then transferred into a small separating funnel and allowed
to separate for 510 min. The lower phase was discarded and
the upper phase was recovered in new flasks and FAME in
hexane were dried with sodium sulfate and the sodium sulfate
was removed by filtering through a Pasteur pipette containing
glass wool. The operating conditions of the gas chromatograph
(PYE UNICAM, GC 104) were: flame ionization detector
(FID), stainless steel column packed with 10% diethylene gly-
col succinate polyester (DEGS), column temperature: 195 C
(maintained for 10 min isothermal), injection port temperature:
210 C, detector temperature 210 C, carrier gas (N
2
) with 35
40 ml/min flow rate, recorder chart speed 640 mm/h. The
methyl ester peaks were identified by co-chromatography with
standard fatty acid methyl ester (Sigma Chemical Co, USA)
mixtures by comparing their retention time with the retention
time of known fatty acids and quantified by a Spectraphysic SP
4270 integrator.
2.5. Analysis of vitamins
Ascorbic acid content in sub samples was determined
according to Roe and Kuether (1943) modified by Dabrowski
and Hinterleitner (1989). The plankton were homogenised in
5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution containing 250 mM
(HClO
4
) and 0.08% ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA)
using an motor driven glass Teflon homogeniser in ice and
centrifuged at 29,000 g for 30 min at 4 C. Total ascorbic acid
content in tissue homogenate was measured by 2,4 dinitro
phenylhydrazine (DNPH) method by Roe and Kuether (1943)
modified by Dabrowski and Hinterleitner (1989) in which 2, 4
dinitrophenyl hydrazine derivative of ascorbate was measured
spectrophotometrically at 524 nm. Modification of original
method included incubation with dichloroindophenol (DCIP)
shortened to 20 min, incubation temperature was 30 C and
additional blank per sample was included to account for in-
terfering substances according to Dabrowski and Hinterleitner
(1989). For dry weight measurement sub samples of plankton
collected from same batch were oven dried at 60 C for 24 h till
constant weight.
Vitamin A of sub zooplankton samples was analysed
according to the method of Soni et al. (1997). Known amount
of zooplankton was homogenised with chloroform (CHCl
3
).
The filtrate was added with benzene:toluene (2:1v/v) fol-
lowed by acid mixture containing H
2
SO
4
: glacial acetic acid
(1: 4 v/v) which gave blue colour. The blue colour initially
produced immediately changed to pink colour and the solu-
tion remained covered with benzene or toluene, which stabi-
lizes the colour by probably preventing the oxidation of
chromophore. The max was measured at 525 nm against a
reagent blank.
Vitamin E was extracted following the method Quaife and
Dju as described by Oser (1960) and estimated by the method
of Emmerie-Eangel Reaction (ferric chloride-dipyridyl meth-
od). Extracted homogenate was mixed with ferric chloride
348 G. Mitra et al. / Aquaculture 272 (2007) 346360
reagent (0.1 g FeCl
3
dissolved in 50 ml absolute ethanol) and
0.5% dipyridyl in absolute ethanol. The mixture was mixed by
swirling. The mixture was again mixed with absolute ethanol
and shaken vigorously. The max measured at 520 nm against
a reagent blank.
2.6. Mineral analysis
The ash was moistened with a small amount of glass-
distilled water and 5 ml of 6 N hydrochloric acid (AR grade)
was added. Calcium was measured by flame photometry, P
content by spectrophotometry following Fiske and Subbarow
method (Fiske and Subbarow, 1925) and trace elements (Zn,
Cu, Fe and Mn) by atomic absorption spectrophotometry
(AAS).
2.7. Enzyme assays
The total digestive enzymes: protease, lipase and amylase
were measured in the pooled zooplankton homogenates. For
homogenate preparation 100 mg sample was ground in a potter
blender with 0.89% NaCl solution. After homogenisation the
samples were sonified for 30 s and centrifuged at 12,000 g for
10 min at 4 C. During preparation the homogenates were
continuously kept on ice.
Total protease activity was measured in a medium contain-
ing 0.05 M trisHCI buffer (pH 8.0) using bovine serum
albumin (0.5 mg/ml) as substrate. The assay mixture consisted
of 200 l BSA solution, 100 l enzyme solution and 200 l
buffer was incubated at 37 C for 30 min, the reaction was
stopped with addition of cold trichloroacetic acid (10%). The
enzymatically liberated amino acids were assayed according to
the method of Marks and Lajtha (1963). The results are ex-
pressed as g leucine liberated per mg protein in sample per
hour. Protein content of the supernatant solution was deter-
mined by the method of Lowry et al. (1951), using bovine
serum albumin (BSA) as standard.
The assay of amylase activity was based on method of
Bernfeld (1955). The activity is expressed as mg maltose
liberated from starch/g protein/h.
Activity of lipase was measured using the method of
Seligman and Nachlas (1963) using the substrate, 0.2% -
napthyl laurate in acetone: water (1:9 v/v). A unit activity is
defined as g -napthol liberated from -napthyl laurate in
60 min at 37 C. Specific activity is expressed as lipase activity
per mg protein (Lowry et al., 1951).
Activity of l-gulonolactone -oxidase was measured using
the method as described by Mukhopadhyay et al. (1998).
Known quantity of plankton was homogenised in a glass ho-
mogeniser with 2 ml 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) con-
taining 1 mM EDTA and 0.2% sodium deoxycholate. The
supernatant was assayed spectrophotometrically for ascorbic
acid by method described above. Protein was assayed in super-
natant by the method of Lowry et al. (1951).
Table 1
Composition of mixed zooplankton collected from different ponds
Pond 1 Pond 2 Pond 3 Pond 4 Pond 5 Pond 6
Proximate composition
Dry matter (DM) 11.812.10
c
11.012.61
c
10.093.18
c
9.592.22
b
7.410.49
a
10.493.11
c
Crude protein (% of DM) 79.911.6
d
78.911.97
c
78.851.65
c
76.142.3
b
76.480.98
b
73.153.87
a
Crude lipid (% of DM) 12.072.98
b
13.701.89
c
12.212.4
b
10.793.6
a
14.550.97
d
13.91.87
c
Total carbohydrate(% of DM) 4.792.56
a
4.111.99
a
4.061.79
a
3.002.1
a
3.092.6
a
3.622.98
a
Ash (% of DM) 3.221.33
a
3.283.68
a
4.883.93
b
10.071.26
e
5.881.98
c
9.330.98
d
Enzymes
Amylase (g maltose/mg protein/h) 241.227.10
e
222.635.61
d
109.394.42
a
105.974.33
a
153.923.12
b
185.444.81
c
Protease (g leucine/mg protein/h) 6.710.21
ab
6.540.21
a
7.570.25
c
6.820.12
b
6.770.19
b
7.610.29
c
Lipase (g naphthol/mg protein/h) 34.000.37
a
35.380.46
ab
37.680.65
c
36.450.57
b
35.650.33
ab
35.162.98
a
Vitamins
Vitamin A (g/gm DM) 21.840.976
b
52.041.15
d
62.311.50
f
15.591.39
a
53.931.46
e
47.371.05
c
Vitamin E (g/gm DM) 230.6318.4
a
267.2215.06
b
258.6611.26
b
228.937.58
a
333.4710.4
d
319.3911. 06
c
Vitamin C (g/gm DM) 15.160.16
a
15.410.34
a
17. 210.88
b
24.014.61
c
39.070.64
d
38.670.74
d
Minerals
Ca (mg/100 gm DM) 1.660.19
b
1.361.16
a
1.740.07
b
2.360.43
c
2.640.17
d
2.770.24
d
P (mg/100 gm DM) 0.860.20
c
0.370.07
b
0.940.09
d
0.320.08
ab
0.330.03
ab
0.240.05
a
Mn (mg/100 gm DM) 0.310.21
d
0.020.0
a
0.210.11
c
0.080.02
b
0.390.03
e
0.340.24
d
Zn (mg/100 gm DM) 1.010.05
b
1.020.07
b
0.060.03
a
2.580.17
d
1.310.21
c
2.640.19
d
Fe (mg/100 gm DM) 0.840.04
d
2.200.32
e
0.320.06
b
0.130.03
a
0.530.03
c
0.160.01
a
Cu (mg/100 gm DM) 0.080.01
b
0.070.07
b
0.160.17
c
0.080.14
b
0.070.02
b
0.050.02
a
Values are given as meanStandard deviation (SD) (n=12). Mean values with different superscripts in a row are significantly (Pb0.05) different
from each other.
349 G. Mitra et al. / Aquaculture 272 (2007) 346360
2.8. Collection of water sample and qualitative analysis of
plankton
Regular fortnightly sampling of water from the above aqua-
tic bodies was done in the morning (08:00 h) and relevant
physico-chemical parameters were analyzed. The phosphate-
phosphorus (PO
4
P) content of the water was estimated by the
stannous chloride method (Clesceri and Greenbreg, 1989), pH
by Elico digital pH meter L 1120, free CO
2
(titrimetric method
using N/44 Na
2
CO
3
), alkalinity (titrimetric method using
0.02NH
2
SO
4
; Clesceri and Greenbreg, 1989), Nitrite-N(NO
2