0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
35 vues21 pages
This presentation was delivered by Rowan Kyle (Partner, Opus International Consultants) during the parallel session (C1) on "Performance-Based Roads Contracts: Dos and Don'ts" at the ADB Transport Forum on 16 September 2014.
Titre original
ADBTF14_C1 Summary of Global Experiences with Performance Based Road Contracts
This presentation was delivered by Rowan Kyle (Partner, Opus International Consultants) during the parallel session (C1) on "Performance-Based Roads Contracts: Dos and Don'ts" at the ADB Transport Forum on 16 September 2014.
This presentation was delivered by Rowan Kyle (Partner, Opus International Consultants) during the parallel session (C1) on "Performance-Based Roads Contracts: Dos and Don'ts" at the ADB Transport Forum on 16 September 2014.
Contracts (Dos and Donts) Mr. Rowan Kyle Opus International Consultants New Zealand Asian Development Bank Transport Forum 16 September 2014
This Presentation Will Cover: Background Main drivers of testing PBRCs in Punjab, (India), Liberia and New Zealand Capacity building of domestic contractors Main benefits obtained after the first pilot Recommendations for the future dos and donts
2 Background Punjab, India Funder World Bank Development 9 Month Contract: 2008 2012 204km network single contract package Implemented 2012 -10 Years Liberia Funder World Bank 180km network length full reconstruction Implemented 2012 10 Years New Zealand Entire 11,000 KM State Highway Network moving to PBRCs. 7 Years. 3 Main drivers of PBRCs in Punjab 4 Increased pavement lifecycles Delivery of defined service levels Linked to clients asset management capacity building Improved linkage between expenditure and outcomes Increased focus on road safety.
Punjab OPRC 5 Punjab OPRC 6 Punjab OPRC 7 Main drivers of testing PBRCs in Liberia 8 A flexible model to deliver full reconstruction and long term maintenance Transfer of risk to contractor for design and construction outcomes Increase focus on post construction maintenance and road user needs Capacity building within the clients organisation.
15 Liberia OPRC 16 Main drivers of Implementing PBRCs in New Zealand
23 Regional Maintenance Contracts Av of 500km in each network Contracts awarded to date (5) - all below estimate! Greater control and asset management by the Agency Consistent service levels nationally Increased risk transfer to contractors Increased value for money outcomes Increased asset lifecycles Agency required to save $160m over 3 years.
Capacity Building of Domestic Contractors
Punjab, India: - Indian contractor and subcontractors used. Liberia: - Chinese contractor, local labour force engaged. New Zealand Significant focus on healthy market place 20% sub-contractor (by value) is mandatory. 17 Main Benefits Obtained after the First Pilot
Punjab, India: Programmed works on track and a good focus on Routine Maintenance and road safety from the outset. Liberia: Improved awareness of the importance of quality and safety by the Contractor. Approximately 45km of pavement reconstructed and 1 bridge rebuilt. New Zealand, cost savings achieved, more control and involvement by the highway agency. 18 What are the Key Success Factors (the Dos)? Road Agency institutional buy-in Adequate and committed funding available Early identification of impediments legal/institutional Capacity building in both government agencies and the private sector Effective risk identification and sharing Procurement process get the best contractor possible and focus on (i) technical support; (ii) technical requirements; and (iii) evaluation criteria Performance measurement / incentives / enforcement
19 . Pitfalls to Avoid (The Donts) Externally- imposed change (for sake of change) with little internal (domestic) ownership/buy-in Paradigm shift (centrally driven) incompatible with current industry capacity One size fits all approach Service level scope creep specifying more to be done than can be afforded The impact of delaysTime really is money! Aging of collected data / cost of recollection / risk of variations Increased asset deterioration / additional maintenance requirements Impact of price adjustment over time significant risk to employer / donor Increased road user costs / delayed project benefits Increasing hazard level / accident rates / fatalities Political fallout / loss of credibility.