Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 22

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

Ammonia Synthesis with Aspen HYSYS V8.0
Part 3 Process Economic Analysis
1. Lesson Objectives
Acquire basic knowledge on the evaluation of the economics of a chemical process
Build upon the closed loop Ammonia Synthesis process simulation
Add process stream prices in feed and products
Add utility costs in the equipment
Learn how to perform economic evaluation within Aspen HYSYS.
Transform simplified process into a more realistic design
Economic Analysis of followings:
Capital Cost
Operating Cost
Raw Materials Cost
Product Sales and Utilities Cost
Estimation of Pay Off period
2. Prerequisites
Aspen HYSYS V8.0
Microsoft Excel
Completed design modules Design-001H and Design-002H
Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012
3. Background, Recap of Ammonia Process

The examples presented are solely intended to illustrate specific concepts and principles. They may not
reflect an industrial application or real situation.
4. Brief Introduction to Process Economic Analysis

During the conceptual design phase 80% of capital costs are determined and 95% of your operating costs are
determined at this phase. Operating costs are typically 2-3 times the amount of capital costs. Decisions made
during the conceptual design process have a major impact on the final project so it is important to make the
right decisions based on rigorous cost estimates instead of guesswork. The typical workflow of the cost
estimation process is shown below.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012
Typical Workflow of Cost Estimation

5. Aspen HYSYS Solution
The following flowsheet was developed for a closed loop Ammonia Synthesis process.

5.01. Open the solution .hsc file for the closed loop Ammonia Synthesis.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012
5.02. The final step of Design_002 was to run a Case Study. This altered the Temperature of stream S6, and
thus changed the purity of stream NH3. Double click on stream S6. In the Worksheet | Conditions page,
change the Temperature back to 26.85C.

5.03. Next, double click on TEE-100 and set the Flow Ratio of Purge to .019. We are now ready to evaluate

5.04. First we will enter the buying and selling prices of our feed and product streams in order to determine if
our process is capable of making money. Double click the SynGas feed stream and go to the Cost
Parameters form under the Worksheet tab. Select Mass Flow for Flow Basis and enter 0.26 Cost/kg for
Cost Factor.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

5.05. Next, double click the product stream NH3. In the Cost Parameters form, select Mass Flow for Flow
Basis and enter 500 Cost/ton for Cost Factor.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

5.06. To view the total stream costs, go to the Economics tab in the ribbon and select Stream Price.

5.07. This will open up the Model Summary Grid. Here you can view the total cost for each material stream.
SynGas has a total cost of $15,941/hr, while the product stream NH3 has a value of $28,794.7/hr. In
this case the product stream is roughly twice as valuable as the feed stream. This is a good sign and
indicates that this process may be profitable.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

5.08. Next we will estimate costs for utilities. Double click on energy stream Q-Comp1. Select Power for
Utility Type.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012
5.09. Double click on energy stream Q-Comp2 and select Power for Utility Type.

5.10. Double click on energy stream Q-Heater and select Fired Heat (1000) for Utility Type.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012
5.11. Double click energy stream Q-Cooler and select Cooling Water for Utility Type.

5.12. Double click Q-Reac and select Cooling Water for Utility Type.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012
5.13. To view the utility summary, click Flowsheet Summary in the Home tab of the ribbon.

5.14. The Flowsheet Summary window will appear. Go to the Utility Summary tab. Here you can view the
cost of each utility and the total costs of utilities. The Total Costs of Hot Utilities are $2792/hr, and the
Total Costs of Cold Utilities are $25.47/hr.

5.15. The operating profit of this process is equal to:

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012
The operating profit of this process is $10,036.23 per hour. The next step is to evaluate the capital costs
of the process.
5.16. This simulation has so far taken into account the mass and energy balances but it has yet to consider
realistic equipment design constraints. This simulation is highly simplified and has served to prove this
process has potential to be profitable. The next step is to transform this highly simplified design into a
real-life design which will provide more accurate estimations for capi tal and operating costs. This is
done using the built in economics in Aspen HYSYS.
Transform simplified design using built in Economic Analyzer
5.17. Go to the Economics tab, and select Activate Economics. This will enable the Economic Analysis
functionality in Aspen HYSYS.

5.18. When the economic analysis is Activated, the Integrated Economics buttons are enabled and ready to
apply economic calculations. Next, click the Map button.

5.19. The map function is a key step in determining project scope and cost. This function enables unit
operations from the simulation model to be mapped to real -world equipment so that preliminary
equipment sizing can be performed. This mapping process is analogous to equipment selection and
sizing and will serve as the basis in determining costs. When the Map button is clicked, the following
window will appear. Press OK to continue.
Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

5.20. The following window titled Map Preview will allow you to change the mapping for certain unit
operations. The Economic Analysis has pre-defined default mappings for unit operations. However,
these may be changed to create a more realistic cost evaluation. For example, the default mapping for
heaters are floating head shell and tube exchangers, but heater block E-100 is a furnace which burns
natural gas.
Select E-100 and click the drop down menu under Equipment Type.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012
5.21. A new window will appear, select Heat exchangers, heaters and press OK.

5.22. Next, choose Furnace and click OK.
Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

5.23. Lastly, select Vertical cylindrical process furnace and click OK.
Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

5.24. You have now successfully changed the mapping of E-100 and its cost will be evaluated accordingly. We
must also change the mapping of the reactor from an agitated tank to a plug flow reactor. For this
process it is sufficient to model the reactor as a shell and tube heat exchanger, because the reactor will
be a vessel containing tubes. Select the CRV-100 and click the drop down menu to change equipment
type. Select Heat exchangers, heaters | Heat Exchanger | Fixed tube sheet shell and tube exchanger.
Click OK in the mapping window to complete the mapping process.

5.25. Next, click on Size. The sizing process will complete.

5.26. Select View Equipment to view the results of the sizing.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

5.27. The Economic Evaluation Equipment Summary Grid will open. Go to the Equipment tab. You may
encounter an error for CRV-10 involving both the shell and tube streams being heated. This can be
addressed by changing the outlet temperature (stream S5V) from CRV-10 to 481.8 C, which assures
that the shell stream will decrease in temperature.

5.28. We are ready to evaluate. Click the Evaluate button in the ribbon. The economic engine will perform
the analysis, it may take a few moments.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

5.29. Click View Equipment, and go to the Equipment tab to view any errors that occurred during evaluation.
These errors will tell you what inputs or changes are required in order to cost the simulation more

5.30. The evaluation error for compressor E-100 states that the material specified is inadequate for design
conditions. To fix this, go to the EFU VERTICAL tab and select a suitable material for construction.
Select 304S (stainless steel) for Material.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

5.31. The error for K-100 is that the inlet temperature is too high. To fix this we will had a cooler before the
compressor to cool down the inlet stream.

5.32. Double click K-100 and remove stream SynGas as an Inlet stream. Create an Inlet stream called
SynGas2. Add a Cooler block to the flowsheet and select SynGas as the Inlet stream, SynGas2 as the
Outlet stream, and create an Energy stream called Q-Cooler2. Specify a Delta P of 0 and an outlet
Temperature of 300 K. Double click stream Q-Cooler2 and specify Cooling Water as the Utility Type.
The flowsheet should now look like the following.

5.33. The errors for both E-101 and CRV-100 are that there are no materials in the database that are suited
for such a high temperature and pressure combination. These materials will likely have to be custom
made for this specific process and priced accordingly. However for this simplified simulation, we can try
lowering the operating pressure in order to get a cost estimate. In real life it may not be plausable to
Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012
change the operating conditions, as the reaction kinetics may be very dependent on temperature and
pressure. However, for this simulation we are not using kinetics. Therefore the reaction will not be

5.34. Double click each compressor and change the outlet pressure to 190 bar_g. The process will now
operate at lower pressures, allowing economic evaluation to produce a cost estimate.

5.35. Repeat the mapping and sizing process since a new piece of equipment now exists on the flowsheet.
When ready, click Evaluate. The equipment results will now look like the following in the Economic
Evaluation Equipment Equipment Grid. There should not be any errors.

5.36. Go the Summary tab to view results.

5.37. This table displays the different costs associated with constructing and operating this process as well as
the total product sales per year. This process appears to have the potential of being a highly profitable
investment, with a payoff period of only 3.64 years.

5.38. Click on the Investment Analysis button.
Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

5.39. This will open up a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet that summarizes the results. In the Excel spreadsheet
there will be the following sheets: Run Summary, Executive Summary, Cash Flow, Project Summary,
Equipment, Utility Summary, Utility Resource Summary, Raw Material Summary, and Product

5.40. The Executive Summary sheet is a very useful sheet which displays the project name, capacity, plant
location, description, scheduling, and investment information. This is shown below.

5.41. The Cash Flow sheet is also useful and displays various costs and assumptions that went into making the
economic estimations.
Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012

6. Conclusion
Aspen HYSYS along with the economic analyzer tool can quickly create first approximations of process sizing and
costs. This is very useful when attempting to compare several process designs to decide which design will have
the best potential to be profitable. If a process has proven to be profitable at this level of analysis, costing
engineers will then take this preliminary design and fine tune it in a more detailed costing application such as
Aspen Capital Cost Estimator. Taking a conceptual design from a process simulator and being able to accurately
estimate the associated costs is extremely valuable and can be the difference between a successful investment
and a company going out of business.

Design-003H Revised: Nov 7, 2012
7. Copyright

Copyright 2012 by Aspen Technology, Inc. (AspenTech). All rights reserved. This work may not be
reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of
RESPECT TO THIS WORK and assumes no liability for any errors or omissions. In no event will AspenTech be
liable to you for damages, including any loss of profits, lost savings, or other incidental or consequential
damages arising out of the use of the information contained in, or the digital files supplied with or for use with,
this work. This work and its contents are provided for educational purposes only.

AspenTech, aspenONE, and the Aspen leaf logo, are trademarks of Aspen Technology, Inc.. Brands and
product names mentioned in this documentation are trademarks or service marks of their respective companies.