0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
357 vues2 pages
This rubric outlines criteria for evaluating journal article critiques across several categories, including APA style, communication of the study's purpose, design, sample, data collection, analysis, findings, and the student's own analysis. Points are awarded based on demonstrating key elements within each category, such as clearly stating the problem, research questions, sampling method, data collection instruments, statistical analysis, results, and rating the quality of the study. Higher scores require addressing more of the specified elements for each section in a clear, logical, and supported manner.
This rubric outlines criteria for evaluating journal article critiques across several categories, including APA style, communication of the study's purpose, design, sample, data collection, analysis, findings, and the student's own analysis. Points are awarded based on demonstrating key elements within each category, such as clearly stating the problem, research questions, sampling method, data collection instruments, statistical analysis, results, and rating the quality of the study. Higher scores require addressing more of the specified elements for each section in a clear, logical, and supported manner.
This rubric outlines criteria for evaluating journal article critiques across several categories, including APA style, communication of the study's purpose, design, sample, data collection, analysis, findings, and the student's own analysis. Points are awarded based on demonstrating key elements within each category, such as clearly stating the problem, research questions, sampling method, data collection instruments, statistical analysis, results, and rating the quality of the study. Higher scores require addressing more of the specified elements for each section in a clear, logical, and supported manner.
APA & Writing Quality (5) Paper includes reference pages Paper consistently and flawlessly follows guidelines and APA manual for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations. No spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent (5) Paper includes title and reference pages. Paper follows guidelines and APA manual for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations, but several errors are evident. Paper contains several spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors. (2-4) Paper is missing title and/or reference pages. Paper lacks formatting for headings, spacing, in-text and reference list citations as recommended in guidelines and APA manual. Five or six errors are evident. Paper is riddled with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors. (0-1) Communication of knowledge - Purpose of the Study (5) All three of the following are demonstrated: (1) statement of problem is presented clearly and logically with evidence drawn from the article (2) the purpose and importance of the study is presented and supported with content from the article; (3) the research questions or hypotheses are noted. (5) Two of the following are demonstrated: (1) statement of problem is presented clearly and logically with evidence drawn from the article (2) the purpose and importance of the study is presented and supported with content from the article; (3) the research question or hypotheses are noted. (2-4) One of the following is demonstrated: (1) statement of problem is presented clearly and logically with evidence drawn from the article (2) the purpose and importance of the study is presented and supported with content from the article; (3) the research question or hypotheses are noted. (1) Communication of knowledge - Study Design (5) All three of the following are demonstrated: (1) type of study is noted quantitative or qualitative; (2) study design is noted explanatory, descriptive, exploratory, evaluation; (3) independent and dependent variable (s) are correctly noted. (5) Two of the following are demonstrated: (1) type of study is noted quantitative or qualitative; (2) study design is noted explanatory, descriptive, exploratory, evaluation; (3) independent and dependent variable (s) are correctly noted (2-4) One of the following is demonstrated: (1) type of study is noted quantitative or qualitative; (2) study design is noted explanatory, descriptive, exploratory, evaluation; (3) independent and dependent variable (s) are correctly noted (1) Communication of knowledge - Sample (7) All four of the following are demonstrated; (1) the sampling method and type is noted probability or non- probability snowball, convenience, random, quota, etc; (2) sample size is noted (3) characteristics of sample are presented; (4) representativeness of sample is discussed. (7) Three of the following are demonstrated; (1) the sampling method and type is noted probability or non- probability snowball, convenience, random, quota, etc; (2) sample size is noted (3) characteristics of sample are presented; (4) representativeness of sample is discussed. (3-6) Less than three of the following are demonstrated; (1) the sampling method and type is noted probability or non-probability snowball, convenience, random, quota, etc; (2) sample size is noted (3) characteristics of sample are presented; (4) representativeness of sample is discussed. (1-2) Communication of knowledge - Data Collection (10) All three of the following are demonstrated; (1) the data collection instrument is discussed (survey, interview, tests, etc); (2) reliability and validity of instruments are addressed; (3) data collection procedure is presented clearly and concisely time frames, location, participants permission and confidentiality and/or anonymity. Two of the following are demonstrated; (1) the data collection instrument is discussed (survey, interview, tests, etc); (2) reliability and validity of instruments are addressed; (3) data collection procedure is presented clearly and concisely time frames, location, participants permission and confidentiality and/or anonymity. One of the following is demonstrated; (1) the data collection instrument is discussed (survey, interview, tests, etc); (2) reliability and validity of instruments are addressed; (3) data collection procedure is presented clearly and concisely time frames, location, participants permission and confidentiality and/or anonymity. (1-3) (8-10) (4-7) Communication of knowledge - Data Analysis (5) All three of the following are demonstrated; (1) the data analysis is described; (2) descriptive statistics clearly describe the sample; (3) inferential statistics used to test the hypothesis are noted. (5) Two of the following are demonstrated; (1) the data analysis is described; (2) descriptive statistics clearly describe the sample; (3) inferential statistics used to test the hypothesis are noted. (2-4) One of the following is demonstrated; (1) the data analysis is described; (2) descriptive statistics clearly describe the sample; (3) inferential statistics used to test the hypothesis are noted. (1) Communication of knowledge - Findings (5) All four of the following are demonstrated; (1) the results of the study are presented; (2) the interpretation of results are clearly and concisely described; (3) generalizability of findings is discussed (4) suggestions for further study are noted. (5) Three of the following are demonstrated; (1) the results of the study are presented; (2) the interpretation of results are clearly and concisely described; (3) generalizability of findings is discussed (4) suggestions for further study are noted. (3) Less than three of the following are demonstrated; (1) the results of the study are presented; (2) the interpretation of results are clearly and concisely described; (3) generalizability of findings is discussed (4) suggestions for further study are noted. (1-2) Communication of knowledge - Your Analysis (8) All four of the following are demonstrated; (1) using the test the study method listed in the journal article paper format, your rating of the study is noted defective, substandard, or adequate; (2) a discussion of your rating is clearly and logically presented; (3) your discussion addresses strengths and weaknesses of the study; (4) cultural and ethical issues are discussed in your analysis. (7-8) Three of the following are demonstrated; (1) using the test the study method listed in the journal article paper format, your rating of the study is noted defective, substandard, or adequate; (2) a discussion of your rating is clearly and logically presented; (3) your discussion addresses strengths and weaknesses of the study; (4) cultural and ethical issues are discussed in your analysis. (3-6) Less than three of the following are demonstrated; (1) using the test the study method listed in the journal article paper format, your rating of the study is noted defective, substandard, or adequate; (2) a discussion of your rating is clearly and logically presented; (3) your discussion addresses strengths and weaknesses of the study; (4) cultural and ethical issues are discussed in your analysis. (1-2)