Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
RECONSTRUCTION, WITHOUT
SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION:
Observations from Aceh’s eastern coast
George Junus Aditjondro
2
RECONSTRUCTION, WITHOUT SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION:
Observations from Aceh’s eastern coast1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By George Junus Aditjondro
1
Based on the Field Research in Aceh sponsored by the International NGO Forum on Indonesian
Development (INFID) in March – May 2007.
3
These two factors – the economic significance of Aceh’s eastern coast and the
emergence of GAM on the eastern coast – are very closely interconnected. As noted
by Djalal and Djalal (2006: 22-3):
Liquified natural gas, or LNG, reserves were discovered in Aceh in 1971, and
this discovery was instrumental in changing Acehnese society and politics.
Aceh’s gas fields were a virtual gold mine, producing some 40 per cent of
Indonesia’s total LNG production, some 22 per cent of its total gas exports,
and about ten per cent of its oil production. In monetary terms, Aceh
contributes some US$ 2.6 billion to Jakarta’s coffers from its LNG supplies
alone. …… As a result, Aceh’s contribution to Indonesia’s overall economic
development has been massive. The province’s natural and industrial wealth
combined makes up eleven per cent of Indonesia’s national revenue.
According to the World Bank, Aceh was for many years Indonesia’s fourth
richest province. …..[Ironically] In 1993, fourty per cent of Acehnese were
categorized as impoverished. That is the highest incidence of poverty in all of
Sumatra’s eight provinces. And, in a survey of all of Indonesia’s 27 provinces,
Aceh was the seventh poorest. Why was this so? Because year after year, the
government returned less than five per cent of Aceh’s lucrative revenues to
Aceh.
4
GAM’S SHADOW GOVERNMENT:
The sense of economic injustice, created by the contrast between the glaring
Lhokseumawe Industrial Zone and the poor villages surrounding the zone with its
luxurious residential site and golf course, combined with the ongoing repressive
tactics used by the Indonesian armed forces against the guerilla movement, caused the
movement to swell to up 15,000 armed members (Djalal & Djalal 2006: 32).
The thirty years of struggle against the Indonesian armed forces, has turned
GAM – especially its military wing, TNA (Tentera Nanggroe Aceh) – into a very
hierarchical and well-organized organization. Following the death of the former TNA
commander, Abdullah Syafei, Muzzakir Manaf took over the armed resistance’s
command. Manaf presided over seventeen regional commanders, or panglima
wilayah, who each presided over four district commanders, or panglima daerah. At
the lowest level is the panglima sagoe, whose organizations are primarily small cells
of individuals – and many of them were only part-time fighters, spending the rest of
the time farming, fishing, or employed in seasonal work (idem).
5
THE HIRARCHICAL STRUCTURE OF GAM
Ketua
KPA
(Panglima
TNA)
17 Panglima
Wilayah
17 x 4
Panglima Daerah
17 x 4 x 4
Panglima Sagoe
17 x 4 x 4 x 6
Mukim (x bbrp Gampong)
6
The GAM resource person mentioned earlier, confirmed and further
elaborated the organizations structure mentioned by Djajal and Djalal (2006: 32).
Each Panglima Wilayah presides over four Panglima Daerah, and each Panglima
Daerah presides over four Panglima Sagoe. Each Panglima Sagoe presides over six
Mukim, or cluster of Gampong, or hamlets, while each Mukim covers an indefinite
numbers of Gampong (see Diagram on previous page). This structure turned GAM
into an actual shadow government, especially on the eastern coast of Aceh, since
GAM has its own keuchik, or gampong chief, distinct from the keuchik approved by
the Indonesian government.
Apart from the political and economic significance of GAM, which during the
armed struggle collected pajak nanggroe, a special tax to support the resistance
(Djalal & Djalal 2006: 31), people from Northern Aceh also pride themselves for
historical reasons, namely coming from Samudra Pasai, often simply abbreviated as
Pase. This is the oldest Islamic kingdom in the Indonesian archipelago, founded by
Sultan Maliku’s-Saleh in 1285 and lasted until 1522 (Said 1981: 82; Parlindungan
2007: 506-8). The name of this earliest Acehnese kingdom has been immortalized by
GAM in naming their guerilla region which overlaps with Lhokseumawe (now a
municipality) and the new district of North Aceh, as mentioned earlier.
Although not as destructive as on the West coast of Aceh and in Banda Aceh
and on the coast of Aceh Besar, the December 2004 tsunami has left its trail – and tale
– of destruction also on Aceh’s eastern coast, from the district of Pidie to the
municipality of Langsa. Most badly hit were the coastal villages of North Aceh.
Ironically, however, the new municipality of Lhokseumawe, which was the former
district capital of North Aceh, which is the base of most of most lucrative big
industries of Aceh, escaped the wrath of the tsunami. Hence, the regional office of the
Aceh-Nias Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Coordinating Body (BRR Aceh-Nias) is
located in Lhokseumawe, and so are most of the local, national, and international
NGOs, as well as the state and privately owned companies involved in the
rehabilitation and reconstruction work on the eastern board of Aceh.
Then, KPA has appointed its functionaries at district and subdistrict level, by
following the TNA/GAM hierarchy of Panglima TNA Æ Panglima Wilayah Æ
Panglima Daerah Æ Panglima Sagoe. So, basically, from an ‘illegal’ organization
7
during the armed resistance, GAM has transformed itself into a ‘legal’ and respectable
organization, with social duties.
Social duties, since KPA – apart from BRR – became the main place where
former combatants and their widows, came to ask for financial support, expecting that
KPA could always help them to overcome their economic problems. In North Aceh
alone, according to sources in Lhokseumawe, the local KPA chapter had to provide
Rp 800 million to former combatants and their families and widows.
All these projects generate the badly needed cash for KPA functionaries to
provide the financial relief for former combatants and their widows. In the case of the
sixty houses that are being built for former combatants and their widows, for each
house Rp 42 million is provided by the Indonesian emergency relief organization to
the KPA leader, who keeps a portion for the provincial KPA coffers and
‘subcontracts’ the construction of the houses to the local KPA officials. With the risk,
that in some cases, lower quality bricks or wood is used to build the houses. Then, in
the case of the Cunda Bridge, the costs of building the bridge is rather marked up to
Rp 23 billion, while the actual costs are rather much lower. This bridge is officially
built by Pulo Gadeng, as is the case of the sixty houses for former combatants and
their widows.
Manaf’s triple functions, however, is not only accepted by most of the former
TNA and GAM members, but also by the national elite in Jakarta. Seven months ago,
according to sources in Lhokseumawe, a memorandum of agreement (MoU) was
signed between a younger brother of Surya Paloh, and Muzakir Manaf as chairman of
KPA, to build eleven gas stations in Aceh. Those eleven gas stations were distributed
among eleven Panglima Wilayah, who are considered to be close (loyal?) to the
mualim. Most of the gas stations are going to be located on the eastern coast, along
the highway between the border of Aceh Tamiang and North Sumatera, and Banda
Aceh, but some of them are also to be off that east coast highway and on the west
coast highway instead. The construction of one of those brand new gas stations had
just been completed in the subdistrict of Beureuneun in the district of Pidie, which the
author of this report visited on 15 July 2007.
8
The constructions of those eleven gas stations are still covered in a shrowd of
mistery. According to a contractor who had joined the first public offering to build
those gas stations, each gas station costs Rp 17 million, but the local Panglima
Wilayah received an allocation of Rp 200 million to cover the costs of obtaining
licences. Contractors interested in building the gas stations soon backed off, when
they were told that they could not only build, say, three gas stations, and had to build
all the eleven.
It is also not clear yet, which younger brother of Surya Paloh signed the MoU
and provided the funds to build those eleven gas stations. The only brother of Surya
Paloh, who is known for his business acumen and connections, is his brother-in-law,
Rosano Barack, a younger brother of Surya Paloh’s wife, Rosita Barack, and one of
the colleagues and confidants of Bambang Trihatmodjo, Soeharto’s second son and
behind-the-scene leader of the Bimantara Group (which is now run by Harry
Tanusudibyo).
Although his name does not appear in the MoU with the KPA leader, is has
been alleged by business sources in Lhokseumawe, that companies linked to the Vice
President, Jusuf Kalla, are also taking part in underwriting this gas stations project.
While making a big buck from this project, since gas stations are indeed doing good
business in the economically thriving province of Aceh, it is probable that the rapport
created by the two Golkar dignatories and the KPA leaders is meant to prevent a
revival of GAM’s ambitions of an independent Aceh. It is unclear how this second
aim will be facilitated by the joint Paloh-Kalla and KPA project, especially since
Manaf has been appointed as vice chairman of the newly born GAM Party. So,
making money from gas stations spread along the main eastern and western highways,
as well as along the higway from Meulaboh to Takengon and Langkat, makes more
sense.
The quickly growing businesses of Muzakir Manaf’s Pulo Gadeng Group and
their proximity to the current GAM-dominated administration, has led to
dissatisfactions among former combatants, who have been left out in the cold. Former
combatants who had surrendered to the Indonesian troops before the Helsinki peace
agreement, have been denied the economic and social benefits from KPA and Pulo
Gadeng (see Nasikhin 2007), which may lead to a type of “East-West” polarization
which has nearly ripped the Timor Leste society apart (for a thorough analysis of this
polarization, see Aditjondro 2007).
9
this case, the former GAM leaders have to be careful not to repeat the mistakes of the
Indonesian military, who set up foundations which then became shareholders of big
business groups, claiming to raise funds to help widows, orphans, retirees, and low
ranking soldiers, pioneered by Soeharto during his transition from army officer to
becoming Indonesian dictator for more than thirty years. Not much wealth from those
military-controlled businesses have filtered down, while making Soeharto and his
generals extremely rich (see Aditjondro 1998: 32-6).
Back to Aceh, then, the big question is, have all the billions of dollars
channeled to the war- and disaster-torn province – in the form of disaster relief, as
well as investments -- really helped to uplift the poorest of the poor in the province,
or, create a new elite? After traveling to many parts of the province, interviewing
people, and reading other observers’ reports, my impression is that new elite is in the
formation, which does business happily with the old provincial and national elite,
since, money unites and poverty divides people. We can see how happily the old and
new business elite socialized during the recent congress of Acehnese business people,
Kongres Saudagar Aceh in Banda Aceh at the end of July 2007, completely forgetting
that some of them – such as Surya Paloh, the son of an Indonesian police officer, and
Muzakir Manaf – were on the opposing sites of the 30-year long conflict.
ABSENTEE FISHERFOLKS:
My observations on Aceh’s eastern coast, though, have not been focused
mainly to newly emerging elite, or, only on the transformation of GAM from an
armed resistance movement to a business vehicle. I have also visited fisherfolk
villages, interview fisherfolks, observe their traditional fishing techniques, and
interview social workers who have been working with fisherfolks and other coastal
villagers, whose houses were hit by the December 2004 tsunami. Villages, such as
Lhok Puuk and Bantayan, which were badly hit by the tsunami, or, villages such as
Hagu Selatan, near the Pertamina depot in Lhokseumawe, which were saved from the
tsunami.
Although it has not (yet) been turned officially into a district regulation
(peraturan daerah), the local government has, in collaboration with some
international NGOs, strongly encouraged people to move away as far as possible from
the sea shore. The fear of another tsunami has been instrumental to encourage this
10
move away from the sea, a traumatic development for villagers who have lived for
generations along the coast, eking a simple living from artisanal fishery.
Does that mean that the coast has become a dangerous place to be, and to earn
a living? Certainly not, for the rich Acehnese who own most of the fish ponds
(tambak) and hatcheries along the coast of North Aceh. And who are they? Many of
them rarely wet their feet at the sea coast, since they are government employees, who
have been able to become absentee coastal landowners from their wealth which only
God knows how that wealth was generated. Nearer to the town of Lhokseumawe,
motorized boats with computerized GSP gadgets which can chase fish up to seven
hours sailing from the town are anchored in the bay, near the Army-controlled
recreation beach in Lhokseumawe. Who owns those boats? Again, not the ordinary,
artisanal fisherfolks, but the dean of the local Faculty of Economics, a military
business unit, and other non-fisherfolk business people are the owners.
The absence of the enforcement of coastal agrarian reform laws since the New
Order, and the thirty year armed conflict between GAM and TNI, have enabled a new
class of bureaucratic and military capitalists to control the coastal and marine
resources of Aceh’s eastern coast. Only those with money, power, and guns, could
control those resources, forcing local villagers to keep on fishing with their row boats,
or forcing them to leave fishery and become farmers.
CONCLUSION:
Hence, one can conclude this odyssey into the reconstruction business of post-
tsunami and post-Helsinki Aceh with one conclusion: Aceh’s reconstruction is a case
of reconstruction, without social transformation. Those on the bottom of the social
ladder, including those on the bottom of the guerilla movement, have mostly stayed
on the bottom, and those on top of the social ladder, including those on top of the
independence movement, have moved nicely into the national, regional, and global
economic arena.
11
Bibliography:
Aditjondro, George Junus (1998). Dari Soeharto ke Habibie: Guru Kencing Berdiri,
Murid Kencing Berlari: Kedua Puncak Korupsi, Kolusi, dan Nepotisme Rezim Orde
Baru. Jakarta: Masyarakat Indonesia untuk Kemanusiaan (MIK) & Pijar Indonesia.
--------------- (2007). “Challenging the Shrinking Democratic Space in East Timor.” In
Joel Paredes, Marissa de Guzman and Eltheodon Rillorta (eds). Breaking Through:
Political Space for Advocacy in Southeast Asia. Manila: South East Committee fo
Advocacy (SEACA), pp. 83-106.
Djalal, Hasjim & Dini Sari Djalal (2006). Seeking lasting peace in Aceh. Jakarta:
Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
Kell, Tim (1995). The Roots of Acehnese Rebellion, 1989-1992. Ithaca: Cornell
Modern Indonesia Project.
Nashikin (207). “Alex Enggan Berpolitik.” In Puthut EA (ed), Kisah-Kisah di Dalam
Lipatan: Sisi Lain Bencana Alam. Yogyakarta: YAKKUM Emergency Unit Press, pp.
3-8.
Said, Mohammad (1981). Aceh Sepanjang Abad. Medan: PT Percetakan dan
Penerbitan Waspada.
Parlindungan, Mangaraja Onggang (2007). Pongkinangolngolan Sinambela gelar
Tuanku Rao: Teror Agama Islam Mazhab Hambali di Tanah Batak 1816-1833.
Yogyakarta: LKiS.
12