0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
33 vues1 page
In modern day society, this so called animalistic instinct has been hidden under the facade of ethics and morals. In a situation of conflict, the individual concerned will opt for the most sensible option. However, this may option may not even be the option which ensures a comfortable circumstance for them as well as safety.
In modern day society, this so called animalistic instinct has been hidden under the facade of ethics and morals. In a situation of conflict, the individual concerned will opt for the most sensible option. However, this may option may not even be the option which ensures a comfortable circumstance for them as well as safety.
In modern day society, this so called animalistic instinct has been hidden under the facade of ethics and morals. In a situation of conflict, the individual concerned will opt for the most sensible option. However, this may option may not even be the option which ensures a comfortable circumstance for them as well as safety.
I dont know what Londons coming to the higher the buildings the lower the morals.
There is no such thing as a moral or an immoral book. Books are well written or badly written. That is all.
The pendulum of the mind oscillates between sense and nonsense, not between right and wrong.
One of the greatest tragedies in mankinds entire history maybe that morality was hijacked by religion.
Survival. It is the one thing that is innate to all human beings. The human coding of the human brain as well as the wiring of our entire system affects us in such a way that it commands we find an escape route or a way to ensure our safety when encountered with a conflicting situation. However, in modern day society, this so called animalistic instinct which is somewhere omnipresent in all of us, varying in degree, has been hidden under the faade of ethics and morals; factors that have begun to affect us ever since education became large part of our existence. Thus, perhaps it is due to the construction and retention of this faade that humans somewhere adopt a pretentious attitude to the situation promising themselves and anyone else concerned that if a testing and harsh situation were to arise then they would firstly evaluate and then decide on the right from the wrong thereby ignoring the power of the intrinsic compass; failing to realise that the pendulum oscillates between sense and nonsense, not being right and wrong in a testing situation.
When placed in a situation of conflict, it is almost certain that the individual concerned will opt for the most sensible option. This may option may be the option which ensures a comfortable circumstance for them as well as safety; at this point deciphering the right from wrong may not even be a fleeting thought when survival is in question. Shin Dong Hyuk, a ex prisoner and the only known escapee from prisoner camp fourteen a group of concentration camps run by the North Korean government as a form of punishment for the alleged wrongdoers exemplified the aforementioned animalistic instinct when he sacrificed his own mother and brother and placed his life above theirs hierarchically. Born into the concentration camp as a result of the reward of love making his parents received, Dong was raised in the coarse and strident environment of the camp where manslaughter and bloodshed were daily occurrences. The moral compasses of the prisoners were non-existent and hence they served as a representation of a human on a very basic level, subtracting the ethics and morals that have become a part of modern society. Hence, when questioned by the guards regarding the secret escape plan made by his mother and brother, Dong chose to give away the lives of his mother and brother if it meant saving his own without flinching.