Tools and Strategies for Product Life Cycle Management
A Case Study in Foundry
INTRODUCTION As a next generation of lean thinking, a philosophy to eliminate waste and inefficiency across all aspects of product life, PLM has emerged as a newest strategic approach to increase the productivity of an organization. The esign for !nvironment, a recent philosophy, has gained attention to many international companies as it introduced isposal and "ecycling as a ma#or functional area and redefined the PLM concept $cradle to grave% to $cradle to cradle%. &n this regard, inverse manufacturing and digital manufacturing concepts were also introduced to contri'ute in PLM. PLM has 'een a proven approach for (!Ms to increase their productivity, improve their product )uality, speed up deli*very, and increase the profit and to 'ecome more efficient. +owever, small and medium enterprises ,-M!s. like foundries, who are suppliers to (!Ms, are still in their infancy without adopting this strategic 'usiness approach. /y selecting and implementing appropriate PLM strategies in a small foundry, an attempt was made to assess the immediate performance outcomes following the implementation of PLM tools. PRODUCT LIFC!CL MANA"MNT #PLM$ Manufacturing companies are compounded with many 'usiness challenges such as glo'al competition, increasing la'or costs, increasing product complexity and engineering product data, and more governmental and organizational standards and regulations. &n order to pursue a more competitive 'usiness model, they have 'een keen to utilize the new )uality of &0T to enhance the colla'oration among their customers, sup*pliers and shareholders. &ntegration is accompanied or achieved, respectively 'y different levels of interaction1interoperation of actors or of systems. &nteractions include the exchange of reciprocal information, the #oint arrangements of goals, the systematic matching of performances and synchronization of actions%. PLM helps fast integration of systems 'y providing a platform for intense interactions using latest technologies. The availa'le PLM soft*ware tools can 'e clustered in three groups 2 3. &nformation management ,e.g. methods for identifying, structuring, classifying, modeling, retrieving, sharing, disseminating, visualizing and archiving product, process and pro#ect related data.. 4. Process management ,e.g. methods for modeling, structuring, planning, operating and controlling formal or semi*formal processes like engineering release processes, review processes, change processes or notification processes.. 5. Application integration ,e.g. methods for defining and managing interfaces 'etween PLM and different authoring applications like 0A, 0AM, 0A! and integrated enterprise software such as !"P, -0M or 0"M.. PLM Tool %endor Client Focus Accolade -opheon -mall*Medium Agile Advantage (racle1Agile -mall*Medium Aras &nnovator Aras 0orp -mall*Medium Arena PLM Arena -olutions -mall*Medium !novia Matrix (ne assault -ystems Medium*Large !novia -marTeam assault -ystems -mall*Medium /PMplus &ngennus -mall*Medium Product0enter -ofTech -mall*Medium -AP PLM -AP Medium*Large Teamcenter!ngg -iemens PLM Medium*Large Teamcenter !xpress -iemens PLM -mall*Medium Think PLM Think5 -mall*Medium 6indchill PT0 Medium*Large 6indchill (n*emand PT0 -mall*Medium There are many PLM strategies which can 'e adopted 'y the organization. -ome of these strategies are as follows 2 &ncreased customer involvement 0ustomization of products +ighest functionality products and services Most ro'ust product or services 6idest range of products and services /est processes -tandard product and services 7astest time to market 8alue adding life cycle Lowest cost competitor Longest life product !ach of these strategies may 'e carefully implemented in the organization through appropriate actions 'y understanding glo'al competition, complexity of products and standards and regulations posed 'y government or (!Ms. 7or example, implementation of the strategy $fastest time to market$ re)uires immediate commencement of pro#ects, sharing of information, simulation rather than trial and error, and re*using and updating the information for continuous improvement. /ased on a few selected PLM strategies, this case study discusses2 ,i. the ways to meet an o'#ective of manufacturing the automo'ile impeller casting ,ii. how well the resources such as e)uipments, materials and people are managed or used. DSCRIPTION OF T& CAS STUD! A small foundry in /elgaum foundry cluster ,&ndia. which manufactures impeller casting was chosen for the case study. The customer firm ,Tier3 -upplier. is within 9 km from the foundry and was in demand of superior castings to meet the re)uirements of (!Ms. +owever, these demands were highly fluctuating depending on the market conditions. +ence, the foundry firm ,Tier 4 -upplier. was in great difficulty to meet the resources ,men, material, machines. in order achieve the customer demands. (utsourcing the work due to the shortage of employees and machines was not a wise decision as per their management. Also, there were issues with shortage of materials since inventory control was not a healthy practice in the foundry. As a strategic decision, this foundry was interested to adopt PLM and check the 'enefit of using PLM tools. A few PLM strategies implemented were ,i. shorter time to market ,ii. automation ,iii. 'est process and ,v. minimization of production cost. To march towards this plan of actions, a few healthy practices and digital manufacturing concepts were also introduced to the foundry. 7urther, to understand the immediate advantages, a )ualitative assessment was done on various activities in foundry in which manufacturing of impeller casting was done with and without the intervention of PLM tools. The healthy practices introduced in the foundry include timely interaction among users through commercial PLM tool ,Teamcenter., in*house computer aided design, structural analysis and casting process simulation, interaction with the customer for the finalization of product and delivery schedule, evaluation of man*hours and its appraisal, online monitoring of resources, and accounting. :ser logins were created in Teamcenter to carry out these responsi'ilities and to interact with users and customers. A rapid prototyping ,"P. machine of fused deposition modeling ,7M. type was introduced as a digital manufacturing tool to fa'ricate the complex master pattern. "P takes virtual designs from 0A modeling software, transforms them into thin, virtual, horizontal cross*sections ,generally in -TL file format standardized 'y rapid prototyping industries. and then creates successive layers of polymer materials until the model is physically completed. After structural and process simulations, the 0A model made using PLM tool was optimally ,to approximate exact surfaces. converted to -TL format ,which represents a 5 surface to an assem'ly of planar triangles.. The model in -TL format was then pre*processed in &;-&<+T program ,user interface of "P machine. to ad#ust the size, location and orientation of the model within the "P machine. -licing of the mod*el ,which can vary from =.=3 mm to =.> mm. was done to fix a deposition thickness of =.34? mm to meet the desired )uality of pattern. Tool path generation, support material ,-"*5=. generation, assigning of material ,A/-*M5=. for 'uilding, were other pre*processing steps done in &;-&<+T. The time taken to 'uild the parts and the amount of 'uilding material and the support material re)uired for the parts could 'e o'tained from the software. RSULTS AND DISCUSSIONS There are many advantages of using PLM technology in foundry. /esides the PLM internal drivers such as productivity, )uality, colla'oration and new product development, the ad* vantages include the reduction of human errors, the improved flexi'ility, the dissemination of product knowledge, and the continuous monitoring of their growth rates. /y understanding the activities and the information flow in using PLM tools, some of these advantages were identified. /ased on some identified characteristics of colla'orative engineering, Ta'le 4 presents the advantages of PLM technology compared to conventional technology. Master Pattern of &mpeller 0asting ,a. 6ooden material ,conventional manufacturing. ,'. A/- material ,digital manufacturing. The introduction of "P machine as a digital manufacturing tool significantly decreased the time and energy involved in the production of master patterns. &n addition to this, the usage of polymer1plastic patterns compared to wooden pat*tern have several advantages such as enhanced pattern life in product cycle, great dimensional accuracy, reduction in inspection and rework and also the reusa'ility. 7ig shows the patterns made of Teak wood and A/- ,Acrylonitrile*/utadiene*-tyrene. through conventional and digital manufacturing respectively. Patterns made of A/- are dense, rigid, can serve at higher temperature and has lower shrinkage compared to that of Teak wood patterns. The cost, the size limitation and the easiness in molding process are other ad*vantages over other pattern materials. A microscopic o'servation was also made to understand the surface )uality of the castings o'tained using master patterns made of wood and A/-. The casting photo micrographs o'tained at ?@ magnification indicated 'etter surface finish with A/- master pattern compared to that of wooden pattern. C'aracteristics Con(entional Tec'nology PLM Tec'nology -ingularity Multiple versions of data for individual products, so difficult to identify and control data :ni)ue identifica*tion for each prod*uct, so easy to iden*tify and control product data even after revisions 0orrespondence Limited 'ecause of non*availa'ility of complete data and information a'out physical product +igh 'ecause of availa'ility of com*plete data and in* formation a'out the physical product Tracea'ility "isk of wasting time and energy since product data is not recorded digitally !asy to track the product data and information and its updates 'ecause of digital storage "eflectivity Less fidelity to map infor*mation a'out real product to virtual product +igh fidelity since all data and infor*mation a'out real product is recorded 0ued availa'ility Product and process data not availa'le as and when re)uired leading to was*tage of time "ight product data and information at right time even without any search 0omplexity ifficulty due to incom*plete representations and insufficient information !asy to modify product data and information to in*clude any complexi*ty leading to mass customization -ecurity Less security and difficulty in tracking the activities +ighly secured since each user is provided with login and password (wnership ifficult to track the own*ership of product1 practic*es1processes and cost involved !asy to track the ownership of prod*uct1practices1processes and cost in*volved !ducation A Training ifficulty in presentation of product data1 portfolio of company Product data and information can 'e retrieved easily at any time to train a new comer1 next generation em*ployee The immediate 'enefits inferred 'y the introduction of PLM technology to foundry as compared to conventional technolo*gy is presented in Ta'le. The approximate time taken to 'uild the casting with conventional technology is found around 4B hrs whereas with PLM technology is around 9 hrs 3= min. A one*third reduction in time is o'served 'y this modernization. This reduction of time is noticea'le 'ecause the activities also include new healthy practices such as computer aided design and analysis, and digital manufacturing using "P. -ince 0A, 0A! and "P can 'e done 'y a 0A@ !xpert, there is an improvement in la'or utilization too The &mmediate /enefits &nferred 'y the &ntroduction of PLM Technology to 7oundry as compared to 0onventional Technology Con(entional PLM Tas)s* O+erations Rating Remar)s Rating Remar)s Placing the order ? hrs &n person 3= min !mail to manager efining the pro#ect ? hrs 6ith proprietor 3 hr As a team with an online discussion Model generation B hrs 4 drawing in paper 3 hr :sing 0A tool within PLM Product modifications *** ;ot entertained 'y the company 5= min 0ustomer suggestions through online interactions -tructural analysis and check *** /ased on heuristics and experience 4 hrs :sing analysis tool within PLM Process simulation A planning *** /ased on heuristics and experience 3 hr :sing process simulation tool within PLM 0ustomer interactions 4 hrs &n person 3= min Through on*line Pattern production 3= hrs +igh carpentry skill is re)uired 4 hrs 5= min Through "P technology Pattern material ;ot good Made using wood1plywood <ood Made using Polymer ,A/-. material ,33B cm5. Cuality of the pattern Low As manually made +igh and relia'le As digitally manufactured Cuality of the casting <ood -urface finish and accuracy is not as desired 8ery good -urface finish and accuracy as desired La'or utilization > Proprietor, esigner, pattern maker, 0lerk, 7oundry technician, D Proprietor, 0A@ !xpert, Accountant, 7oundry technician, Metallurgist, +elper CONCLUSIONS ;ew generation manufacturing companies have modified their views on performance evaluations not only 'ased on their outputs 'ut also 'ased on their outcomes over a period. +ere, the outputs refer to some measura'le )uantities, generally the num'er of products, whereas the outcomes refer to the achievements or delivera'les attained during the product life cycle. PLM as a tool which helps to )uantify the performance over a period also helps in meeting the customer expectations a'out 'oth the product and the process ,how they get, what they want, and what they actually get.. &t is high time to implement PLM tools in modern foundries to enhance their colla'orations and decrease their inefficiency 'y accurate and prompt usage of information. &n this regard, the 'asic concepts and the tools and strategies for PLM were presented in this paper. /y selecting and implementing appropriate PLM strategies in a small foundry, an attempt was made to understand the immediate 'enefits of using PLM tools ,PLM software and digital manufacturing tools.. This study, which indicated the reduction in lead time and improvement in utilization of organizational resources in the production of automo'ile impeller, may 'e further extrapolated to other multi*product, multi*discipline and multi*customer companies to realize the advantages of using PLM technology. /eing skeptical, most of the foundries often state that the huge capital cost, non*availa'ility of skilled la'ors, installation time ,appropriate system integration., insufficient training and support, reluctance towards participation and the financial risks involved are a few reasons for not adopting the PLM technology. +ow*ever, it is advised that the foundries or their clusters who are the suppliers of multiple complex or value added products, especially those 'elongs to (!Ms of automo'ile, medical and aerospace and defense sectors, should implement PLM technology so that they can develop new and innovative products in a very short period of time 'y meeting the demands of (!Ms and hence reap great advantages over their glo'al competitors.