MIS Ph.D. Seminar(Fall 2009)
Instructor:
Young U. RyuIndranil Bardhan
Time & Location:
Wed. 9:30am–1:15pm @ SOM 2.901
Class Activities:
•
Each student will present papers and lead seminars. His or her responsibilities are to presentsummaries of papers and to be in charge of the class discussion.
•
Students arerequiredto thoroughlyreadallassigned papers andparticipate inthe classdiscus-sion.
Performance Evaluation Criteria:
•
Synopsis and presentation of paper from Readings List: 25%. Each student is expected topresent one paper from Dr. Ryu’s list and one paper from Dr. Bardhan’s list.
•
Essay (preliminary research model
/
framework based on one of course topics): 25%
•
Research Paper (should be an extension of Essay): 50% (due during Finals week)
Class Schedule:
Students may download papers from
http://www.utdallas.edu/
∼
ryoung/phdseminar
•
Aug. 26 (Week 1): Course introduction
•
Sept. 2 (Week 2): Data mining methods
–
J. R. Quinlan. (1986). Induction of decision trees.
Machine Learning
, 1(1):81–106.
–
S. Balakrishnama and A. Ganapathiraju. Linear Discriminant Analysis—A Brief Tutorial.
–
J. A. Anderson. (1982). Logistic discrimination. In
Handbook of Statistics 2
, North-Holland,169–191.
•
Sept. 9 (Week 3): Data mining methods
–
K. Knight. (1990). Connectionist ideas and algorithms.
Communications of the ACM
, 33(11):59–74.
–
L.DevroyeandT.J.Wagner.(1982).Nearestneighbormethodsindiscrimination.In
Handbook of Statistics 2
, North-Holland, 193–197.
–
K. P. Murphy. Naive Bayes classifiers.
–
M. Y. Kiang. (2003). A comparative assessment of classification methods.
Decision SupportSystems
, 35(4):441–454.
–
(OPTIONAL) P.S. Bradley, Usama M. Fayyad, and O.L. Mangasarian. (1999). Mathematicalprogrammingfordatamining: Formulationsandchallenges.
INFORMSJournalonComputing
,11(3):217–238.
•
Sept. 16 (Week 4): Data mining methods and Applications
–
Kristin P. Bennett and Colin Campbell. (2000). Support vector machines: Hype or hallelujah?
SIGKDD Explorations
, 2(2):1–13.1
–
Y. U. Ryu and W. T. Yue. (2005). Firm bankruptcy prediction: Experimental comparison of isotonic separation and other classification approaches.
IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, And Cybernetics—part A : Systems And Humans
, 35(5):727–737.
–
(OPTIONAL) B. Padmanabhan and A. Tuzhilin. (2003). On the use of optimization for datamining: Theoretical interactions and eCRM opportunities.
Management Science
, 49(10):1327–1343.
•
Sept. 23 (Week 5): Social network models
–
M. E. J. Newman, D. J. Watts, and S. H. Strogatz. (2002). Random graph models of socialnetworks.
Proceedings of National Academy of Science
, 99:2566–2572.
–
D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks.
Nature
,393(6684):440–442.
–
A-L. Barab´asi, E. Ravasz, and T. Vicsek. (2001). Deterministic scale-free networks.
Physica A
,299:559–564.
–
A-L.Barab´asiandE.Bonabeau.(2003).Scale-FreeNetworks.
ScientificAmerican
,May2003:50–59.
•
Sept. 30 (Week 6): Social network analysis and Applications
–
D. Knoke and S. Yang. (2008). Chapters 4 and 5 of
Social Network Analysis
, Second Edition.SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA.
–
H. K. Kim, Y. U. Ryu, J. K. Kim, and Y. H. Cho. Customer-driven content recommendationover a network of customers.
–
(OPTIONAL) R. Zheng, D. Wilkinson and F. Provost. Social network collaborative filtering.
•
Oct. 7 (Week 7) to Nov. 4 (Week 11):
–
Introduction: IS Economics Research Landscape1. Banker, R.D., and Kau
ff
man, “The Evolution of Research in Information Systems,”
Man-agement Science
, 50, 3, 2004, pp. 281-198.2. IzakBenbasatandRobertW.Zmud,“TheIdentityCrisiswithintheISDiscipline:Definingand Communicating the Discipline’s Core Properties,”
MIS Quarterly
, June, 2003, (pp.183-194)3. (OPTIONAL) Benbasat, I., and Zmud, R. “Empirical Research in Information Systems:The Practice of Relevance,”
MIS Quarterly
, March 1999, pp. 3-16.
–
Data Envelopment Analyses4. Banker,R.D.,A.CharnesandW.W.Cooper. 1984. “SomeModelsforEstimatingTechnicaland Scale Ine
ffi
ciencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”
Management Science
30(9) 1078-1092.5. Bardhan,IndranilR., Cooper, WilliamW., andSubalC.Kumbhakar,“ASimulationStudyof Joint Uses of Data Envelopment Analysis and Statistical Regressions for ProductionFunction Estimation and E
ffi
ciency Evaluation”
Journal of Productivity Analysis
, Vol. 9,No. 3, pp. 249-278, 19986. (OPTIONAL) Banker, Rajiv D. and Sandra A. Slaughter. 1997. “A Field Study of ScaleEconomics in Software Maintenance”
Management Science
43 (12) 1709-1725.
–
IT Impact: Economic Value7. Nigel Melville, Kenneth Kraemer, and Vijay Gurbaxani,“Information Technology andOrganizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value,”
MIS Quarterly
,2004.2
8. Erik Brynjolfsson, and Lorin Hitt, “Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns toInformation Systems Spending,”
Management Science
, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1996, pp. 541-558.9. A. Bharadwaj, S. Bharadwaj, and B. Konsynski, “Information technology e
ff
ects on firmperformance as measured by Tobin’s q”
Management Science
, July 1999.10. (OPTIONAL) Hitt, L.M. and Brynjolfsson, E., “Productivity, business profitability, andconsumersurplus: Threedi
ff
erentmeasuresofinformationtechnologyvalue,”
MISQuar-terly
, 20(2), June, 1996: 121-142.11. (OPTIONAL) M. Anderson et al., Value Implications of Investments in Information Tech-nology,
Management Science
, September 2006.
–
IT Impact: Strategic Value12. Michael Wade and John Hulland,“The Resource-Based View and Information SystemsResearch: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research,”
MIS Quarterly
, 2004.13. Rajiv D. Banker, Indranil R. Bardhan, Hsihui Chang, and Shu Lin, “Plant InformationSystems, Manufacturing Capabilities and Plant Performance”
MIS Quarterly
, Vol. 30, No.2, pp. 315-337, June 2006.
–
IT & Real Options13. Taudes, A., Feurstein, M., and Mild, A. “Option Analysis of Software Platform Decisions:A Case Study,”
MIS Quarterly
, 2, June 2000, 227-243.14. IndranilR. Bardhan, Robert Kau
ff
man, andSanjeewaNaranpanawe, “IT ProjectPortfolioOptimization: A Risk Management Approach to Software Development Governance”
IBM Journal of R&D
(formerly
IBM Systems Journal
), Forthcoming.16. R. Fichman. “Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory andPractice,”
Info. Sys. Res.
, 15, No. 2, 132-154 (2004).17. (OPTIONAL) R. Fichman, M. Keil, and A. Tiwana. “Beyond Valuation: Real OptionsThinking in IT Project Management,”
Calif. Mgmt. Rev.
47, No. 2, 74-100 (2005).
–
IT Impact: Inter-Organizational Systems (IF TIME PERMITS)18. Arvind Malhotra, Sanjay Gosain, and Omar El Sawy, “Leveraging Standard ElectronicBusiness Interfaces to Enable Adaptive Supply Chain Partnerships,”
Information SystemsResearch
, September 2007.19. BalaHillolandV.Venkatesh,“AssimilationofInter-organizationalBusinessProcessStan-dards,”
Information Systems Research
, September 2007.
•
Nov. 11 (Week 12) to Dec. 2 (15): Research Discussion3
Satisfaites votre curiosité
Tout ce que vous voulez lire.
À tout moment. Partout. Sur n'importe quel appareil.
Aucun engagement. Annulez à tout moment.