Analysis of William Blakes The Tyger and The Lamb from Song of
Experience (17!" and Song of #nnocence (17$"
Blakes poetry contained an honesty against which the whole world conspires because it is unpleasant. - T. S. Eliot William Blake was a mystic poet and this Mystic movement of his mind required Metaphor, he saw no likeness but identities, so the images and symbols are found galore (plentiful) in his poems !he image of generally viewed as singles in dimension while the symbol as more comple" #egions and $a%amian remark that Blake&s poetry deals in the subtlest (illustrated) of symbolism with the skill that can not be matched 'n the Song of Innocence (1789) his symbols are largely drawn from the Bible, but in the Song of Experience (1794) he often uses symbols of his own making, and his meaning is more elusive The Lamb and The Tyger are both representative poems of Blake !hey celebrate two contrary states of the human soul( innocence and e"perience !he lamb celebrates the divinity and innocence of not merely the child but also of the beast harmless creatures on earth, vi% the lamb )!he #amb* e"plores the innocence of children&s understanding of +od and the natural world !he child asks the lamb weather it knows its merciful creator, the tiger giver of its soft easy clothing&s or its tender voice which fills the valets with music and pleasure But the child does not wait for the answers ,e answers the question himself ,e refers to the meekness and gentleness of +od as the lamb&s creator ,e is one who calls himself a lamb ,e is meek and mild and comes on earth as a little child ,owever, the child concludes wishing the lamb +od&s blessings !he poem is a simple one but its apparent simplicity simply intensifies its deeper meaning ,ere the creator is identified with the created 't is written in a lyric style of great freshness, simplicity, and directnessBoth series of poems take on deeper resonances when read in con-unction 'nnocence and ."perience, )the two contrary states of the human soul,* are contrasted in such companion pieces as The Lamb and The Tyger. Blake&s subsequent poetry develops the implication that true innocence is impossible without e"perience, transformed by the creative force of the human imagination The Tyger may be interrupted as an allegory reflecting the opposing powers of +od and /atan& of good and evil Both !iger and #amb are the visible parts of +od&s creation +od created the tiger, the aggressor 1 and the lamb the prey !he coe"istence of fierceness represented by the tiger and the gentleness represented by the lamb is a mystery, a mystery of contrariness !he violent strength alarming in its possibilities of destructiveness is seemingly an open challenge to the idea of a benign creator .arly in the song of 'nnocence, Blake sets his poem about lamb with its artless question )#ittle lamb, who made thee0 1os&t thou know who made thee0* /imilarly early in the song of e"perience to quote $2Bowra (rom !he "oman!ic Imagina!ion)3 Blake sets his poem about the tyger with its more frightening and more fighter question !he lamb and the tyger are symbol for two different states of the human soul3 when the lamb is destroyed by e"perience the tyger in needed to restore the world !he images in the poems again added significance and magnitude when they move into the arena of symbolism Blake retaining the old spelling !iger& is worth noticing for it&s seems to emphasi%e the symbolic quality and priest nature of the animal !he metallic and the clinging image are suggested by the use of the hammer& the chain& the anvil& !he physical perceptions of the creator at work wresting with his stupendous creation are suggested by this shoulder hand and feet !he shape from and physical movement of the beast have been caught in the phrase fearful symmetry& and the idea of physical immediacy is convey in the line,)What the hand dare sei%e the fire0* 4or some the tiger stands for the pervasive evil in the world for others it symboli%es an awful beauty in creation of the universe !he forest of the night& in which the tiger lurks represents ignorance repression and superstition !he fire& is a symbol of wrath or passion of anger !he stars& too suggests the angels 5 !he rebel angels Both the lamb and the tiger are created by +od !he lamb represents the milder and gentler aspect !he lamb represents the calm and pleasant beauty of creation, the tyger its fearful beauty !he grass contrasts between the nature of the lamb and the tyger make the poet ask( did he who made the lamb make thee& !he tyger is +od&s wrath as the lamb is his love !he tiger is a truth lens, natural predatory and it is man own burning passion shut up within his natural body& !he lamb, on the other hand, is an ob-ect of -oy 'ts bleat fills all the valleys with -oy !he question asked in The 2 Lamb proceeds from the simplicity and innocence of the questioner (!he child) !hey have nothing of the bottling and enigmatic nature of the questions asked in the tiger Boehme, the 6lchemical philosopher, says the +od of the holy world and the +od of the dark world are not two +ods there is but one +od& ,e himself is all Being ,e is evil and good, ,eaven and ,ell, light and darkness, eternity and time Where ,is love is hid in anything there ,is anger is manifested #egoius and $a%amian remark that Blake&s poetry deals in the subtlest of symbolism with the skill that can not be matched !he lamb represents the purity of the divine soul and it is complete in itself while uninterrupted by e"perience Blake&s !yger represents the fierce of the soul !he tyger stands for the revolt and wrath ,owever terrible the tyger may be it is the different manifestation of $hrist 3