Before the advent of the naturalistic drama in the
middle of the nineteenth century, European theatre was primarily a form of entertainment and amusement, as manifested in the plays of Pinero, Jones and even Oscar Wilde. However, playwrights like !sen, Hauptman, "hekov and #trind!erg had revolutioni$ed European drama !y turning their attention towards the serious socio%economic pro!lems and issues. n their hands the emergence if the Prose Play of deas accrued in which each play is centred around some predominant idea dealing with the social like of man or his relationships. &he plays of 'eorge Bernard #haw have similar sociological concerns though he prefers to entitle some of them as (Pleasant( and others ()npleasant(. *rms and the +an, ,ou -ever "an &ell and "andida have !een designated !y #haw as !eing Pleasant, !ut ironically they are not entirely pleasant plays. +any pro!lems posed in them are thought%provoking and even distur!ing. #haw terms them as (Pleasant( only in contrast to the ()npleasant Plays( such as +rs. Warren(s Profession and Widowers( Houses, in which the pro!lems presented are far more grim and unnerving, such as prostitution and the victimi$ation of the tenants !y landlords, than in (Pleasant Plays(. * (Pleasant Play( in #haw(s de.nition can never !e merely an entertaining play. *ccording to him, a merely entertaining presentation is (!ad(, and /Bad theatres are as mischievous as !ad schools or !ad churches./ He feels that theatre is e0tremely important as a (social organ(, and that /dramatic invention is the .rst e1ort of man to !ecome intellectually conscious./ &hus even in his (Pleasant Play( "andida he stimulates the audience intellectually to ponder upon di1erent possi!ilities in human relationships. &he (deas( in #haw(s plays usually revolve around relationships !etween men and women, hus!ands and wives, parents and children. +any of them focus on pro!lems related to attitudes, disposition and even moral consciousness. n "andida the central idea is the traditional love triangle in which the youngster, Eugene +arch!anks intrudes into a marital relationship and challenges its assumed !ases of happiness. He is compelled .nally to depart from the wedded life of 2ev. James +orell and "andida, allowing the hus!and and wife to revive their relationship on new premises of understanding. &he entire play is targeted towards the moment of "andida(s .nal choice. *s this point a comparison !etween #haw(s "andida and !sen(s -ora !ecomes unavoida!le. -ora sym!oli$es a woman(s 3uest for emancipation to ascertain her individual identity. #he attempts to !reak free from the shackles of a conventional marriage in which her hus!and treats her with no more importance than a mere doll. 4or the sake of her ideal, -ora foregoes the security of a family and a marital life and even leaves her children while walking out of &orvald(s life. "andida(s choice re5ects #haw(s insistence on the importance of the practical wisdom. "andida, unlike -ora, is a thoroughly practical minded woman. &hough she is not crude like Burgess, she inherits some of her father(s utilitarian philosophy. Her .nal choice of staying with +orell, is not decided !y her love for him !ut the .nancial and social security of a married life that she is afraid of risking. #he is temperamentally di1erent from !oth +orell and +arch!anks. &hough she is easily approacha!le, her thoughts and motives are impenetra!le. #he is as unmoved !y +orell(s genuinely passionate sermons on social reform as !ored !y +arch!ank(s poetry. #he looks after +orell(s needs and his households with perfect e6ciency7 she e3ually comes to +arch!ank(s rescue, o1ering him /her shawl, her wings, the wrath of stars in her head, the lilies in her hand/. ,et she is totally remote from !oth of the men. #haw(s ideas a!out women play with a vital role in "andida. *ccording to #haw, a woman is primarily a manifestation of 8ife 4orce whose primary function is the !iological continuity of the race. "onse3uently #haw !elieves that while choosing a mate, a woman would select the one who would !e the !est father fro her o1springs, eliminating others. &huds her identity as a mother is more fundamental than that of a woman. 4or this reason #haw treats "andida as a mother !y mentioning to Ellen &erry that /"andida is the 9irgin +other, and no!ody else as well as alluding to &itian(s painting of the (9irgin of the *ssumptions(. E. Bentley therefore appropriately comments that instead of the traditional concept of the little woman reaching up towards the arm of a strong man, in "andida we see a strong woman reaching down to pick up her child. Being a mother, "andida is committed to neither of the two men. #haw deals with the idea of women(s emancipation in "andida from an entirely practical point of view. By asserting her will on the two men, "andida converts the patriarchal pattern of the 9ictorian household setup into a matriarchal one. With her monumental in5uence on +orell and +arch!anks, she !ecomes the wielder of power instead of the men. &hrough her .nal choice, she e0poses +orell(s weakness and proves that he is no more than a helpless !a!y who constantly need her motherly attention. #he proves that +orell is the (doll( of the house and she is the real master. n fact she uses +arch!anks to teach +orell a lesson a!out his weakness and destroys his complacency. &he play also e0presses #haw(s idea of man as the spiritual creator in contrast to the women who is the !iological creator. &his is particularly evident in his depiction of +arch!anks. "andida reali$es that +arch!ansk can never !e a proper protector for her children nor provide her with security as he is impulsive and passionate. Whereas, as a poet, he has a su!lime and universal artistic function to perform. f he is con.ned to the domestic role of a hus!and, his aesthetic creativity would !e incomplete. t is for this larger creative purpose that she feels that +arch!anks would !e a!le to .nally renounce his romantic interest in her. He imparts to him a hackneyed piece of practical advice to remem!er : /When am thirty, she will !e forty%.ve. When am si0ty, she will !e seventy%.ve/, not reali$ing that such petty practical concerns do not a1ect +arch!anks. &he ideas a!out marriage that +orell advocates or the ideas a!out love that +arch!anks possesses are dismissed as !eing utterly childish in contrast to "andida(s hardcore practicality. +orel feels that marriage to a good woman is a /foretaste of what will !e !est in the ;ingdom of Heaven/ and +arch!anks ideali$es "andida as a /great soul, craving for reality, truth, freedom/ who should not !e con.ned to trimming of lamp or peeling of onions. ,et ironically neither is a!le to con<ecture her real motive. *s a Play of deas, "andida is not a pleasant one, the cruel re<ection of +arch!anks and the heavy !urden of (mystery( in his soul with which he departs, leaves a sense of !itterness in the minds of the audience. However, the play has a conventional sense of pleasantness in not allowing the institution of marriage to !e seriously challenged !y love.