246807997.xls.

ms_office, Comments
Only the average values, as reported in the literature sources, are listed in this workbook. In some cases only a median value was provided and is
listed instead of an average value. A blank indicates the data was not provided. Every attempt was made to accurately transcribe data values, but
inadvertant errors may exist.
Data provided in this workbook are the data obtained from a literature review as described in the companion report: Lowe, K.S., N.K. Rothe, J.M.B.
Tomaras, K.E. DeJong, M.B. Tucholke, J.E. Drewes, J.E. McCray, and J. Munakata-Marr (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern
Waste Stream from Single Sources: Literature Review. Water Environment Research Foundation, Project Report.
Data qualifiers were used to provide additional information related to the reported values. All data qualifiers are qualitative and subjective and do not
imply data ranking or quality. The data qualifiers selected for each literature source are provided on the "References" worksheet. The data qualifier
key should be used to interpret the data qualifier information and is provided on a separate spreadsheet ("Data Qualifier Key") within this workbook.
Summary statiscal values may vary between this data base and those listed in the report (Lowe et al. 2006) due to data handling. For example,
median and average nitrogen values were based on all reported values converted to mg-N/L. In addition, several references and data values are
included in this data base that were not included in the report because they did not fit into source classifications.
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Reference List
Reference ID Year Author
1 2000 Sauer, D., R. Vogel, and P. Korth
2 2000 Randall, A.A., R. Naik, M. Zepeda, T. McCue, Y.H. Liu, and I. Vassiliev
3 2000 Crawford, G., S. Black, M. Elliott, C. Felipe, G. Daigger, and D. Stafford
4 2001 Babcock Jr., R.W., D.A. McNair, L.A. Edling, and H. Nagato
5 2001 Xingcan, Z., G.T. Daigger, Z. Yue, Z. Yining, and D. Yuetang
6 2002 Shechter, R., J.C. Merchuk, and T. Ronen
7 2002 Bradstreet, K.A., S.E. Seigal, T.E. Wilson, and J.R. Kirkland
8 2002 Crites, R.W., J. Leonhard, and J. W. Smith
9 2002 Gale, A.J.
10 2002 Chen,Y., M. Trujillo, J. Biggerstaff, G. Ahmed, B. Lamb, F. Eremedkar, T. McCue, and A. Randall
11 2002 Garcia, G.E., and J. Kanj
12 2002 Lorenz, W., T. Cunningham, J. Penny
13 2002 Wagener, C.A., S.M. Bellelo, and R.F. Malone
14 2002 Zheng, X., Y. Zhang, L. Jiang, X. Liu, and L. Chen
15 2002 Zhao, H.W., T.J. Mah, D.S. Mavinic. W.K. Oldam, and F.A. Koch
16 2002 Curto, P.R., P. Pearce, T. Water, and S.A. Parsons
17 2002 Sadler, M., F.R. Stroud, and J. Maynard
18 2002 Shin, H., S. Chae, H. Jeong, S. Kang, J. Lim, and B. Paik
19 2002 Chaparro,S.K., and D.R. Noguera
20 2002 Johnson, B., C. Filipe, C. Spani, and G. Crawford
21 2002 Rock, K., and M. Capron
22 2002 Griffin Jr.,D.M., X. Yan, H, Xiang, C. Fletcher, and R. Crawford
23 2002 Egemen, E., A. Hanson, and R. Richardson
24 2003 Gutierrez Sr., M.
25 2003 Insel, G., D. Russell, B. Beck, and P. Vanrolleghem
26 2003 Kwon, J., J. An, K. Shim, H. Shin, and B. Jun
27 2003 Littleton, H.X., G.T. Daigger, and P.F. Strom
28 2003 Magro, D., S.L. Elias, and A.A. Randall
29 2004 Barnard, J., M. Steichen, and C. deBarbadillo
30 2004 Bell, J.A., and J.J. Higgins
31 2004 Griffin Jr.,D.M., C.A. Fletcher, and R.D. Crawford
32 2004 Jones,R., and I. Takacs
33 2004 Pelletier, R.A., T.L. Lothrop, D.S. Sloan, and G.E. Keyser
34 2004 Riska, R., J.A. Husband, P. Kos, and R. Johansen
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
35 2004 Sova, R., J.B. Neethling, D. Kinnear, B. Bakke, G. Brandt, R. Wilson, and S. Crisler
36 2004 Stephens, H.M., J.B. Neethling, M. Benisch, A.Z. Gu, and H.D. Stensel
37 2004 Yang, C., G. Gu, B. Li, W. Lu, and L. Johnson
38 2003 Rich, B., D. Haldeman, T. Cleveland, J. Johnson, R. Weick, and R. Evertt
39 2002 Edvardsson, C.M.
40 2002 Loomis, G., D. Dow,M. Stolt, L. Green, and A. Gold
41 1987 Siegrist, R.L., and W.C. Boyle
42 1989 Anderson, D.L., and R.L. Siegrist
43 1972 Laak, R.
44 - -- reference removed --
45 1996 Wilhelm, S.R., S.L. Schiff, and W.D. Robertson
46 1978 Cooper,I.A., and R. Rezek
47 1980 Baker, L.K.
48 2000 Harrison, R.B., N.S. Turner, J.A. Hoyle, J. Krejsl, D.D. Tone, C.L. Henry, P.J. Isaksen, and D. Xue
49 2002 Steer, D., L. Fraser, J. Boddy, and B. Seibert
50 2004 Christopherson, S.H., D. Schmidt, and K. Janni
51 2004 Joy, D.M., T.R. King, S. Maunoir, H. Philip
52 2004 Lesikar, B.J., O.A. Garza,R.A. Persyn, M.T. Anderson, and A.L. Kenimer
53 2004 Patterson, R.A.
54 2001 Christopherson, S.H., J.L. Anderson, and D.M. Gustafson
55 2001 Lindbo, D.L., and V.L. MacConnell
56 2001 Reneau, R.B.,Jr., C. Hagedorn, and A.R. Jantrania
57 2001 Martinson, M.J., J. M. Anderson, and C.A. Snell
58 2001 Loomis, G.W., D.B. Dow, M.H. Stolt, L.T. Green, A.J. Gold
59 2001 Bohrer, R.M., and J.C. Converse
60 2001 Henneck, J.,R. Axler, B. McCarthy, S. Geerts, S Christopherson, J. Anderson, and J. Crosby
61 1998 Loudon, T.L., G.S. Salthouse, and D.L. Mokma
62 1998 White, K.D., and C.M. Shirk
63 1998 Thom, W.O., Y.T. Wang, and J.S. Dinger
64 1998 Neralla, S., R.W. Weaver, and B.J. Lesikar
65 1998 Wolf, D.C., M.A. Gross, K.E. Earlywine, K.J. Davis, and E.M. Rutledge
66 1998 Penninger, P.G., and M.T. Hoover
67 1998 Weaver, C.P., B.S. Gaddy, and H.L. Ball
68 1998 Converse, J.C., and M.M. Converse
69 1998 Sievers, D.M.
70 1998 Anderson, D.L., M.B. Tyl, R.J. Otis, T.G. Mayer, and K.M. Sherman
71 1998 Roy, C., R. Auger, and R. Chenier
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
72 1998 O'Driscoll, J.P., K.D. White, D.W. Salter, and L. Garner
73 1991 Sherman, K.M., and D.L. Anderson
74 1991 Sack, W.A., N.S. Warmate, L.A. Frich, and S.P. Dix
75 1991 Jacquez, R.B., F. Vora, N. Kareem, and X. Wang
76 1991 Viraraghavan, T., and S.M. Rana
77 1991 Tyler, E.J., M. Milner, and J.C. Converse
78 1991 Siegrist, R.L., R. Smed-Hildmann, Z.K. Filip, and P.D. Jenssen
79 1994 Huang, J., R.B. Reneau, Jr., and C. Hagedorn
80 1994 Anderson, D.L., R.J. Otis, J.I. McNeillie, and R.A. Apfel
81 1994 Duncan, C.S., R.B. Reneau,Jr., and C. Hagedorn
82 1994 Cagle, W.A.,and L.A. Johnson
83 1982 Ronayne, M.P., R.C. Paeth, and S.A. Wilson
84 1994 Piluk, R.J., and E.C. Peters
85 1994 Bruen, M.G., and R.J. Piluk
86 1994 Boyle, W.C., R.J. Otis, R.A. Apfel, R.W. Whitmyer, J.C. Converse, B. Burkes, M.J. Bruch,Jr., and M. Anders
87 1994 Ball, H.L.
88 1994 Converse, J.C., E.J. Tyler, and S.G. Litman
89 1994 McKee, J.A., and J.L. Brooks
90 1984 Troyan, J.J., G.J. Sewards, and R.J. Fimmel
91 1984 Siegrist, R.L., D.L. Anderson, D.L. Hargett, and R.J. Otis
92 1984 Siegrist, R.L., D.L. Anderson, and J.C. Converse
93 1984 Hampton, M.J., and D.D. Jones
94 1984 Effert, D.,J. Morand, and M. Cashell
95 1981 Hargett, D.L., E.J. Tyler,E.J., and R.L. Siegrist
96 1981 Rock, C.A., J.L. Brooks, S.A. Bradeen, and F.E. Woodard
97 1981 Siegrist, R.L., and W.C. Boyle
98 1953 Baumann, E.R., and H.E. Babbitt
99 1977 Sauer, D.K., and W.C. Boyle
100 1977 Machmeier, R.E., and L.L. Mattson
101 1977 Brown, K.W., J.F. Slowey, and H.W. Wolf
102 1974 Brandes, M., N.A. Chowdry, and W.W. Cheng
103 1974 Viraraghavan, T., and R.G. Warnock
104 1974 Ziebell, W.A., D.H. Nero, J.F. Deininger, and E. McCoy
105 1974 Bennett, E.R., K.D. Linstedt, and J.T. Felton
106 1974 Karikari, T.J., C.E. Beer, and R.J. Smith
107 1974 Otis, R.J., W.C. Boyle, and D.K. Sauer
108 1999 Converse, J.C.
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
109 2002 Hatch, D.R., C.A. Jackson Jr., and T.A. Bradford
110 2000 Edvardsson, C.M.,and D.R. Spears
111 1995 Bloomquist, D., and C.J. Schmidt
112 1999 McCarthy, B., R. Axler, S. Monson, J. Henneck, J. Crosby, and P. Weidman
113 1999 Higgins, J.J., and T.W. Groves
114 1999 Ball, E.S., H.L. Ball, and T.R. Bounds
115 1999 Sykes, A.D., G. Loomis, D. Dow, M. Stolt, and B. Moore
116 1999 Converse, M.M. and J.C. Converse
117 1992 Boyer,J.A., and C.A. Rock
118 1991 Boyer, J.A.
119 1991 Converse, J.C., M.E. Kean, E.J. Tyler, and J.O. Peterson
120 1985 Siegrist, R.L.
121 1981 Seabloom, R.W., D.A. Carlson, and J. Engeset
122 1978 Engeset, J., and R.W. Seabloom
123 1978 Siegrist, R.L.
124 1985 Swed, F.M.
125 1987 Pearson, F.C., P. Jenkins, H. McLean, and S. Klein
126 1987 Kiernan, K., C. Brown, M. Benjamin, and J. Ferguson
127 1976 Sauer, D., W.C. Boyle, and R.J. Otis
128 1976 Thiruvenkatachari, V.
129 1976 Otis, R.J., and W.C. Boyle
130 1974 Otis,R.J., N.J. Hutzler, and W.C. Boyle
131 1977 Siegrist, R.L.
132 2003 Dietzman,E.M., and M.A. Gross
133 2003 Whitehill,T.J.,B. Tercha, and J.F. Davis
134 2002 Hanson, A., W. Zachritz, R. Polka, L. Mimela,and B. Thomson
135 2005 Gill, L.W., A. Hand, and C. O'Sulleabhain
136 2005 Charles, K.J., N.J. Ashbolt, D.J. Roser, R. McGuinness, and D.A. Deere
137 1967 Watson, K.S., R.P. Farrell, and J.S. Anderson
138 1971 Kreissl, J.F.
139 1973 Lawrence, C.H.
140 2004 Bounds, T.R.
141 1972 Carich, I.G.
142 1997 Bounds, T.R.
143 2003 Matassa, M.R., McEntyre, C.L., Watson, J.T.
144 1996 Harmon, J., Robertson, W.D., Cherry, J.A., Zanini, L.
145 1988 Cogger, C.G., Hajjar, L.M., Moe, C.L., Sobsey, M.D.
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
146 1981 Kristiansen,R.
147 1973 Walker, W.G., Bouma, J., Keeney, D.R., Magdoff, F.R.
148 1998 Ptacek, C.J.
149 1995 Robertson, W.D., Blowes, D.W.
150 2000 Siegrist, R.L., S. VanCuyk, S. Masson, and E. Fisher
151 2006 Rich, B.
152 2006 Danielson, T.
153 2006 Bounds, T.
154 2002 Nielson, A.M., A.J. DeCarvalho, D.C. McAvoy, L. Kravez, M.L. Cano, and D.L. Anderson
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Title
Biological Phosphorous and Ammonia Nitrogen Removal at a Small Wastewater Treatment Facility
Changes in Anoxic Denitrification Rate Due to Prefermentation of a Septic, Phosphorus Limited Wastewater
The Step Bio-P Process at Lethbridge-Over One Full Year of Operation
Potential For Decentralized Residential Treatment and Reuse of Wastewater in Hawaii
Biological Nutrient Removal Process Selection, Design, And Operation of the Licunhe Wastewater Treatment Plant, Qindao City, China,
Demonstration of An Attached Growth Airlift Reactor for Capacity Increase and Nitrification
Retrofitting Wallinford's RBC's for Nitrogen Removal, Presented at WEFTEC
Performance of a Constructed Wetlands at Cle Elum, Washington
Innovative Wastewater Management Brings High Returns for a Smaller Rural Community
The Effects of Propionic Versus Acetic Acid Content of Domestic Sewage on Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal
Two Years of Membrane Bioreactor Plant Operation Experience at the Viejas Tribe Reservation
Phosphorus Removal in a Membrane Reactor System: A Full-Scale Wastewater Demonstration Study,
Static Low-Density Media Filter for Organic and Solid Removal from Domestic Wastewater
The Development and Application of Chemically and Biologically Enhanced Primary Treatment Process for Municipal Wastewater Treatment
A Technique to Determine the Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification Rates in an Intermittent Aeration Tank
Determining the Potential for Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Based on Wastewater Characteristics
Evaluation of Several Water Reclamation Faculties Employing Biological Nutrient Removal in North Carolina
Behavior of Intracellular Materials and Nutrients in BNR Process Supplied with Domestic Sewage and Food Waste
Reducing Biosolids Phosphorus Content From Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Reactors
Evaluation of Biological Phosphorus Removal Implementation on WWTP Processes Using a Whole Plant Simulator
Onsite Sanitary Systems Wastewater Treatment for the Sewer Impaired
Long Term Performance of a Septic Tank-Rock Filter System
Field Modifications of a Recirculating Sand Filter to Incorporate Nitrogen Removal
Nitrogen Removal Technology is Advanced By The Use Of Continuous Backwash Sand Filters
Evaluation of Nutrient Removal Performance for an Orbal Plant Using the ASM2d Model
Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal of Pilot Scale Plant Using UMBR (Upflow Multi-Layered Bio Reactor ) as Anaerobic/Anoxic Reactor
Summary Paper: Mechanisms of Simultaneous Biological Nutrient Removal in Closed Loop Bioreactors
Effects of Reduced RAS Flows and Volume on Anaerobic Zone Performance for a Septic Wastewater Biological Phosphorus Removal System
Interaction Between Aeration Type and Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification
Long Term Performance Evaluation of Innovative & Alternative Technologies for Decentralized Wastewater Treatment
Enhanced N Removal using Horizontal Subsurface Flow, Mixed Film Beds with Recycle
Modeling the Impact of Anaerobic Digestion on the Overall Performance of Biological Nutrient Removal Wastewater Treatment Plants
Internal RecycleA Side-By-Side Comparison for Reducing Total Nitrogen Values
Pilot Scale Tests of a Unique Approach for BNR Upgrade of a Short SRT High Purity Oxygen System at Pima County, AZ
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Prenitrification and Seeding for Enhanced Nitrification
Comprehensive Analysis of Full-Scale Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Facilities
Two Years of Biological Phosphorus Removal with an Advanced MSBR System at the Shenzhen Yantian Wastewater Treatment Plant
Innovative Systems in the La Pine National Demonstration Project
Enhanced Nutrient Removal by Extended Aeration
Performance of Advanced Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in Rhode Island
Wastewater-Induced Soil Clogging Development
The Performance of Ultra-Low-Volume Flush Toilets in Phoenix
Home Plumbing Fixture Waste Flow and Pollutants
Biogeochemical Evolution of Domestic Waste Water in Septic Systems: 2 Application of Conceptual Model in Sandy Aquifers.
Treatability of Pressure Sewage, in Individual Onsite Wastewater Systems
The Impact of Water Conservation on Onsite Wastewater Management, in Individual Onsite Wastewater Systems
Treatment of Septic Effluent For Fecal Coliform and Nitrogen in Coarse-Textured Soils: Use of Soil-Only and Sand Filter Systems
Efficiency of small constructed wetlands for subsurface treatment of single-family domestic effluent
Evaluation of Aerobic Treatment Units in Treating High Strength Waste From Dairy Milk Houses
Field Testing of the Eparco Compact Filter Wastewater System
Food Service Establishments Wastewater Characterization
Effective Treatment of Domestic Effluent with a Peat Biofilter-A Case Study at Tingha
Evaluation of Recirculating Sand Filters In Minnesota
Evaluation of a Pear Biofilter Treatment System
Performance Evaluation of Two Pre-Engineered Onsite Treatment and Effluent Dispersal Technologies
Cold Climate Recirculating Sand Filter Design and Experiences: Case Examples of Two Community Systems on Wisconsin Indian Reservations
Evaluation of Innovative Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in the Green Hill Pond Watershed, Rhode Island-A NODP II Project Update
Soil Treatment Performance and Cold Weather Operations of Drip Distribution Systems
Onsite Treatment of Septic Tank Effluent in Minnesota Using SSF Constructed Wetlands: Performance, Costs, and Maintenance
Wastewater Quality and Trench System Design Effects on Soil Acceptance Rates
Performance and Design Recommendations for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Using Constructed Wetlands
Long-Term Results of Residential Constructed Wetlands
Plant Selection for Treatment of Septic Effluent in Subsurface Wetlands
Renovation of Onsite Domestic Wastewater in a Poorly Drained Soil
Performance of an At-grade Septic System Preceded by a Pressure-Dosed Sand Filter on a Wet, Clayey Slate Belt Soil
Effects of Media Variations on Intermittent Sand Filter Performance
Pump Chamber Effluent Quality Following Aerobic Units and Sand Filters Serving Residences
Pressurized Intermittent Sand Filter With Shallow Disposal Field For A Single Residence In Boone County, Missouri
Onsite Wastewater Nutrient Reduction (OWNRS) For Nutrient Sensitive Environments
Use of Non-Woven Fabric in Intermittent Filters
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Long Term Performance of Peat Biofilters for Onsite Wastewater Treatment
An Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compounds and Conventional Parameters From On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems in Florida
Comparison of a Septic Tank-RSF System and an Extended Aeration-ISF System with Respect to Performance and Operational Problems
Onsite Treatment of Septic-Tank Effluent By a Rotating Biological Contactor
Use of Adsorption Models For the Design Of Peat Based Onsite Systems
Wastewater Infiltration From Chamber And Gravel Systems
Humic Substance Formation During Wastewater Infiltration
Constructed Wetlands For Domestic Wastewater Treatment
In-Situ Lysimeter Investigation of Pollutant Attenuation in the Vadose Zone of a Fine Sand
Impact of Effluent Quality and Soil Depth on Renovation of Domestic Wastewater
Onsite Intermittent Sand Filter Systems, A Regulatory/Scientific Approach to Their Study In Placer County, California
Final Report: Oregon On-Site Experimental Systems Program
Small Recirculating Sand Filters For Individual Homes
Performance And Costs of On-Site Recirculating Sand Filters
Nitrogen Removal From Domestic Wastewater In Unsewered Areas
Nitrogen Reduction in an On-Site Trickling Filter/Upflow Filter Wastewater Treatment System
Nitrogen And Fecal Coliform Removal In Wisconsin Mound System
Peat Filters For On-Site Wastewater Treatment
Comprehensive Research On Septic Tank-Soil Absorption Systems in Perth, Australia
Performance Characteristics of a Community Wastewater Absorption System
Commercial Wastewater On-Site Treatment and Disposal
Water Conservation and Residential Wastewater Quality
Field Performance of Three Onsite Effluent Polishing Units
Soil Infiltration Capacity As Affected By Septic Tank Effluent Application Strategies
Treatment of Septic Tank Effluent In A Peat Bed
Onsite Reclamation of Residential Greywater
An Investigation of the Performance of Six Small Septic Tanks
Intermittent Sand Filtration and Disinfection of Small Wastewater Flows
Performance of Alternating Seepage Beds in Ontonagon Clay
The Movement of Salts, Nutrients, Fecal Coliform and Virus Below Septic Leach Fields in Three Soils
Experimental Study on Removal of Pollutants From Domestic Sewage By Underdrained Soil Filters
Treatment Efficiency of a Septic Tile System
Use of Bacteria In Assessing Waste Treatment and Soil Disposal Systems
Rural Home Wastewater Characteristics
Treatment of a Residential Septic Tank Effluent in an Aerobic Lagoon
The Performance of Household Wastewater Treatment Units Under Field Conditions
Nitrogen As It Relates To On-Site Wastewater Treatment With Emphasis on Pretreatment Removal and Profiles Beneath Dispersal Units
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Results of a Constructed Wetland As Pre-Treatment for Domestic Waste with Drip Disposal
Case Study of an Advanced On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Connected to a Single-Family Residence
Final Report Phase I The Determination of Several Effluent Properties from Food Service Establishments that Employ On Site Sewage Treatment Systems
Cold-Weather Operation and Performance of Alternative Treatment Systems in Northern Minnesota
Nitrogen Loading From Non-Residential Facilities
A New Generation of Packed Bed Filters
Evaluation of Treatment Performance in Rhode Island Sand Filters
Sand Filter Evaluation in a Northern Climate
Performance of Septic Tanks
The Effects of Septic Tank Modifications on Effluent Characteristics
Bacterial and Nutrient Removal in Wisconsin At-Grade On-Site Systems
Soil Clogging Effects of Effluent Composition and Loading Rate
Individual Sewage Disposal Systems
Effluent Treatment by Mounds
Management of Residential Grey Water
Performance of a Community Soil Absorption Field
Recreational Vehicle Waste Disposal in Roadside Rest Area Septic Systems
Recreational Vehicle Waste Disposal Stations at Highway Rest Areas
Intermittent Sand Filtration of Household Wastewater
Septic Tank Efficiency
Performance of Single Household Treatment Units
On-Site Household Wastewater Treatment Alternatives: Laboratory and Field Studies
Segregation and Separate Treatment of Black and grey Household Wastewaters To Facilitate Onsite Surface Disposal
Phelps County Update: Case Study of a Public Water Supply District Providing Centralized Management of Decentralized Wastewater
Evaluation of a Recirculating Sand Filter Followed by a Subsurface-Flow Constructed Wetland to Achieve Denitrification
Alternative Small-Flow Wastewater Technologies in the Arid Southwest
Effective Distribution of Domestic Wastewater Effluent Between Percolation Trenches in On-site Treatment Systems
Effluent Quality From 200 On-site Sewage Systems: Design Values for Guidelines
The Contribution from Individual Homes to the Sewer Systems
Waste Treatment for Small Flows
Septic Tank Performance
Wastewater Characteristics Glide, Oregon, Pressure Sewer Systems. Originally presented Feb. 1982, revised and updated Feb. 2004
A Pressure Sewer System Demonstration
Wastewater Treatment Systems for Rural Communities
Tennesee Valley Marina and Campground Wastewater Characterization Screening Study
Impacts on a Sand Aquifer from an Old Septic System: Nitrate and Phosphate
Septic System Performance on a Coastal Barrier Island
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Sand-Filter Trenches for Purification of Septic Tank Effluent: I. The Clogging Mechanism and Soil Physical Environment
Nitrogen Transformations During Subsurface Disposal of Septic Tank Effluent in Sands: I. Soil Transformations
Geochemsitry of a Septic-System Plume in a Coastal Barrier Bar, Point Pelee, Ontario, Canada
Major Ion and Trace Metal Geochemistry of an Acidic Septic-System Plume in Silt
Field Evaluation of Wastewater Soil Absorption Systems with Aggregate-Free and Aggregate-Laden Infiltrative Surfaces
Investigation of an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System in Sandy Soil: Site Characterization and Fate of Anionic and Nonionic Surfactants
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Data Qualifiers
Reference Comments
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Anaheim, October 14-18, 2000
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Anaheim, October 14-18, 2000
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Anaheim, October 14-18, 2000
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Atlanta, October 13-17, 2001
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Atlanta, October 13-17, 2001
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Los Angeles, October 11-15, 2003
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Los Angeles, October 11-15, 2003
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Los Angeles, October 11-15, 2003
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Los Angeles, October 11-15, 2003
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Los Angeles, October 11-15, 2003
Proceedings of WEFTEC, New Orleans, LA, October 2-6, 2004
Proceedings of WEFTEC, New Orleans, LA, October 2-6, 2004
Proceedings of WEFTEC, New Orleans, LA, October 2-6, 2004
Proceedings of WEFTEC, New Orleans, LA, October 2-6, 2004
Proceedings of WEFTEC, New Orleans, LA, October 2-6, 2004
Proceedings of WEFTEC, New Orleans, LA, October 2-6, 2004
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Proceedings of WEFTEC, New Orleans, LA, October 2-6, 2004
Proceedings of WEFTEC, New Orleans, LA, October 2-6, 2004
Proceedings of WEFTEC, New Orleans, LA, October 2-6, 2004
Presented at the 12th Northwest On-Site Wastewater Treatment Short Course and Equipment Exhibition, Seattle, WA.
Presented at the 11th Northwest On-Site Wastewater Treatment Short Course and Equipment Exhibition, Seattle, WA.
Presented at the 11th Northwest On-Site Wastewater Treatment Short Course and Equipment Exhibition, Seattle, WA.
Journal of Environmental Engineering, 113(3):
Journal AWWA
unpublished report, University of Connecticut, Storrs,Connecticut
reference removed
Ground Water, 34(5):853-864
Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference, Ann Arbor Science, MI, 121-154 Data source unclear (raw or STE) - values not used.
Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference, 1980, National Sanitation Foundation, Ann Arbor, MI p61-82
Water,Air, and Soil Pollution 124: 205-215
Ecological Enginnering 18:429-440
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Tenth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Sacramento, CA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 172-177
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Tenth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Sacramento, CA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 298-308
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Tenth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Sacramento, CA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 377-386
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Tenth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Sacramento, CA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 527-536
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Ninth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Fort Worth, TX, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 207-214
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Ninth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Fort Worth, TX, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 225-234
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Ninth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Fort Worth, TX, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 271-280
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Ninth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Fort Worth, TX, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 305-314
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Ninth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Fort Worth, TX, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 506-515
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Ninth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Fort Worth, TX, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 561-583
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Ninth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Fort Worth, TX, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 650-662
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 186-194 data from combination of dorms, dining and apartments -- data not used.
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 195-210
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 220-227
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 247-253
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 320-335
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 326-335
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 363-370
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 388-402
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 403-409
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, 436-445
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 500-508
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Eighth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Orlando, FL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 530-537
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Sixth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Chicago, IL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 62-75
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Sixth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Chicago, IL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI,125-132
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Sixth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Chicago, IL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI,133-142
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Sixth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Chicago, IL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI,165-172
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Sixth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Chicago, IL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 214-222
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Sixth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Chicago, IL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 223-232
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Atlanta, GA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 66-76
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Atlanta, GA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 209-218
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Atlanta, GA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 219-228
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Atlanta, GA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 283-291
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Atlanta, GA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 310-318 Not used in spreadsheet because RSF recirculates back to septic tank.
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Atlanta, GA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 329-338
Proceedings of WEFTEC, Chicago, September 28-October 2, 2002
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Atlanta, GA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 499-503
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Atlanta, GA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 514-525
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Seventh National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Atlanta, GA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 526-535
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, New Orleans, LA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 69-78
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, New Orleans, LA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 144-154
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, New Orleans, LA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 210-219
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, New Orleans, LA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 220-259
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, New Orleans, LA, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 351-361
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Third National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Chicago, IL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 72-84
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Third National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Chicago, IL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 116-123
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Third National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Chicago, IL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 176-186 data on greywater only -- data not used.
University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station, Bulletin Series No. 409, Volume 50, Number 47
Home Sewage Treatment Proceedings of the Second National Home Sewage Treatment Symposium, Chicago, IL, ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 164-174
Home Sewage Treatment Proceedings of the Second National Home Sewage Treatment Symposium, Chicago, IL, ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 185-192 information on tank size only.
Home Sewage Treatment Proceedings of the Second National Home Sewage Treatment Symposium, Chicago, IL, ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 208-217
Home Sewage Treatment Proceedings of the National Home Sewage Treatment Symposium, Chicago, IL, ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 29-36
Home Sewage Treatment Proceedings of the National Home Sewage Treatment Symposium, Chicago, IL, ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 48-57
Home Sewage Treatment Proceedings of the National Home Sewage Treatment Symposium, Chicago, IL, ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 58-63
Home Sewage Treatment Proceedings of the National Home Sewage Treatment Symposium, Chicago, IL, ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 74-78
Home Sewage Treatment Proceedings of the National Home Sewage Treatment Symposium, Chicago, IL, ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 144-151
Home Sewage Treatment Proceedings of the National Home Sewage Treatment Symposium, Chicago, IL, ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 191-201
Proceedings of the 10th Northwest On-Site Wastewater Treatment Short Course and Equipment Exhibition, Seattle, WA, University of Washington, 171-184
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Proceedings of the NOWRA 2002 Annual Conference & Exposition, 117-124
Proceedings of the NOWRA 2000 Annual Conference, 117-124
Unpublished 1995
Proceedings of the NOWRA 1999 Annual Conference & Exhibit, Jekyll Island, GA, 37-44
Proceedings of the NOWRA 1999 Annual Conference & Exhibit, Jekyll Island, GA, 137-141
Proceedings of the NOWRA 1999 Annual Conference & Exhibit, Jekyll Island, GA, 157-163
Proceedings of the NOWRA 1999 Annual Conference & Exhibit, Jekyll Island, GA, 195-200
Proceedings of the NOWRA 1999 Annual Conference & Exhibit, Jekyll Island, GA, 201-210
Proceedings of the 7th Northwest On-Site Wastewater Treatment Short Course and Equipment Exhibition, Seattle, WA, 36-50
M.S. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME
On-Site Wastewater Treatment Proceedings of the Sixth National Symposium on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, Chicago, IL, ASAE,St. Joseph, MI, 46-61
Proceedings of the 5th Northwest On-Site Wastewater Treatment Short Course and Equipment Exhibition, Seattle, WA, 249-256 information contained within Siegrist and Boyle (1987) -- see ref #41
A Study Prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, University of Washington College of Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering
Proceedings of the 2nd Northwest On-Site Wastewater Treatment Short Course and Equipment Exhibition, Seattle, WA, 78-101
Proceedigs of the 2nd Northwest On-Site Wastewater Treatment Short Course and Equipment Exhibition, Seattle, WA, 183-205
An Independent Study Report, University of Wisconsin, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, pp102
Final Report to the Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.,Report no. FHWA/CA/UC-80/01
Final Report to the Washington State Department of Trasportation Report, Report no. WA-RD 60.1
Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE, p 789
Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE, p 505
Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE, p 175
Journal of Water Research, 8:1099-1113
SSWMP, University of Wisconsin
Journal Small Flows Quarterly, Vol 4, no 3
Journal Small Flows Quarterly, Vol 4, no 4
Journal Small Flows Quarterly, Vol 3, no 3
Water Science & Technology, 51(10):39-46 information of flow only
Water Science & Technology, 51(10):163-169 data from combination of 35 and 9 commerical sources -- data not used.
Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 39(12):2039-2054
Paper presented to the 1971 annual meeting, ASAE. Washington State University, Pullman, Wasington.
Journal of the Environmental Health, 36(3):220
Douglas County Deparment of Public Works, Roseburg, Oregon
Environmental Protection Agency information contained within Bounds (1997) -- see ref #142
Tennessee Valley, October 2003
Ground Water. 34(6):1105-1114
Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol 17, no 3, pp 401-408
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol 10, no 3, pp 353-357
Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol 2, no 4, pp 475-480
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, Vol 33, pp 293-312
Ground Water, Vol 33, no 2, pp 275-283
Project Report prepared by Colorado School of Mines for Infiltrator Systems, Inc. www.mines.edu/research/smallq
Personnal Communication - unpublished data from the Final Report: LaPine National Demonstration Project. January 2006.
Personnal Communication - unpublished data from the Lenah Run Wastewater Treatment Plant. January 2006.
Personnal Communication - unpublished data from the Orenco Systems, Inc. STEP/STEG systems. January 2006.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 21: 2606-2616
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Data Qualifiers
Location Region
Literature
Source Analytical Type Frequency
Sampling
Events Seasons
Data
Evaluation Comment
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
Louisiana South 2 1 3 2 1 All 1
New Mexico West 2 3 3 4 4 2
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
municipal
Michigan/British Columbia MW, Canada 2 1 1 4 4 1
Louisiana South 2 3 3 4 4 1
municipal
municipal
municipal
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
municipal
municipal
municipal
Oregon West 2 2 3 4 3 1
California West 2 3 2 4 2 2
Rhode Island NE 2 2 3 2 3 All 1
Wisconsin MW 1 2 1 4 4 All 1
Arizona West 1 2 1 1 2 Fall 1
Ontario Canada 1 3 2 4 4 1
Data source unclear (raw or STE) - values not used.
California West 2 3 3 4 2 Winter 2
Washington West 1 2 3 4 4 2
Ohio MW 1 1 3 3 1 All 2
Minnesota MW 1 3 2 4 4 2
Ontario Canada 1 3 1,2 2 1 All 1
Texas South 1 1 2 1 3 Summer 1
South Wales, Australia Australia 1 2 2 4 2 All 1
Minnesota MW 1 2 2 1 1 All 1
North Carolina South 1 2 3 2 1 All 2
Virginia South 1 2 2 4 4 2
Wisconsin MW 1 3 2 2 1 Fall,Winter,Spring 1
Rhode Island NE 1 2 3 2 2 All 1
Rhode Island NE 1 2 3 2 2 All 1
Minnesota MW 1 2 3 2 1 All 1
Michigan MW 1 3 1 2 2 Winter,Spring, Summer 2
Alabama South 1 3 3 4 4 1
Kentucky South 1 2 3 2 1 All 1
Texas South 1 2 3 1 3 Fall,Summer 1
Arkansas South 1 2 2 2 1 Fall, Winter, Spring 1
North Carolina South 1 3 3 4 4 1
Oregon West 1 1 2 4 4 Breaks down between summer, and then rest of year 2
Wisconsin MW 1 1 2 4 1
Missouri MW 1 2 3 2 1 All 2
Florida South 1 2 1 2 2 Winter, Spring, Summer 1
Montreal Canada 1 3 3 2 1 All 2
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Alabama South 1 2 3 2 2 Summer,Fall 2
Florida South 1 2 2 1 1 Fall,Winter,Spring 1
West Virginia South 1 2 3 1 4 2
New Mexico* West 1 3 2 4 4 1
Saskatchewan Canada 1 2 2 4 4 1
Wisconsin MW 1 3 4 4 1
Norway Norway 1 2 3 1 2 1
Virginia South 1 1 3 2 2 Fall,Winter,Spring 2
Florida South 1 2 1 3 2 All 1
Virgina South 1 2 3 2 2 Summer,Sptin 2
California West 1 2 2 4 4 1
Oregon West 1 2 3 4 4 1
Maryland
Maryland South 1 3 3 1 1 Fall, Winter 2
Wisconsin MW 1 2 1 2 1 All 1
Oregon West 1 3 3 1 1 All 2
Wisconsin MW 1 2 2 4 3 1
Maine, Ontario NE, Canada 1 3 2 2 1 All 1
Perth Australia 3 3 4 4 1
Wisconsin West 1 2 2 4 4 2
Wisconsin West 1 3 2 4 4 2
Indiana MW 1 2 3 4 4 1
Ohio MW 1 2 1 1 1 All 1
Wisconsin MW 1 2 1 4 4 1
Maine NE 1 2 3 4 4 1
municipal
Wisconsin MW 1 3 3 4 4 Summer, Fall 1
Minnesota
Texas South 1 2 3 2 1 All 1
Ontario Canada 1 3 3 1 1 All 2
Ottawa Canada 1 2 3 4 4 1
Wisconsin MW 1 3 3 4 4 2
Colorado West 1 3 3 4 4 2
Iowa MW 1 3 2 1 2 2
Wisconsin MW 1 2 1 2 1 All 1
Wisconsin MW 2 3 3 4 4 2
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Virginia South 2 3 3 4 4 2
California West 2 3 1 1 1 Summer 1
Florida South 3 1 2 4 3 2
Minnesota MW 2 2 3 2 1 Winter,Spring, Summer 1
Massachusetts NE 2 2 2 3 2 All 1
Oregon, Arizona West 2 3 3 4 4 2
Rhode Island NE 2 2 2 2 1 Summer,Fall, Winte 2
Wisconsin MW 2 1 2 4 2 Winter, Spring, Summer 1
Maine NE 2 3 3 4 2 4
Maine NE 2 3 3 4 2 4
Wisconsin MW 2 3 2 4 4 1
Wisconsin MW 1 2 2 3 2 All 2
Washington West 2 3 3 2 1 Fall,Winter,Spring 1
Washington West 2 1 3 2 1 Summer,Fall 1
Wisconsin MW 2 2 3 4 1 4
3 3 4 4 2
California West 2 3 3 4 4 2
Washington West 2 3 3 4 4 2
1 3 3 4 4 2
1 3 3 4 4 2
1 3 3 4 4 2
Wisconsin MW 1 2 1 2 2 Summer 1
3 3 3 4 4 2
Missouri MW 1 3 1 4 4 Spring 2
Pennsylania NE 1 2 2 4 4 1
New Mexico West 1 3 1 2 1 All 1
Ireland
Sydney Australia 2 2 2 1 All 1
Kentucky South 1 2 1 4 4 1
3 3 4 4 2
3 3 4 4 2
Multiple locations 3 3 4 4 2
information contained within Bounds (1997) -- see ref #142
3 3 4 4 2
Tennessee South 3 1 2 3 3 Summer 2
Ontario Canada 1 3 3 4 2 2
North Carolina SE 1 1 3 2 1 All 1
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, References
Norway Norway 1 3 3 2 4 2
Wisconsin MW 1 3 3 4 4 2
Ontario Canada 1 3 3 3 3 Spring 2
Ontario Canada 1 3 3 4 4 2
Colorado West 3 2 2 3 3 Spring 1
Oregon West 3 2 2 2,3 1 All 1
Multiple locations West 3 2 2 4 1 All 1
Florida South 1 2 2 3 1 All 1
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Data Qualifier Key
Location = state where the study was conducted
Region = location of the study based on US Census defined regions
MW = Midwest: IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, and WI
NE = Northeast: CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT
South: AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, and WV
West: AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, and WY
Literature source
1 publicly available and published in a peer reviewed journal
2 publicly available and published in conference proceedings or project report
3 unpublished; information obtained directly from researcher and is not publicly available
Analytical = analytical method used
1 detailed methods used = specified which approved method was used (e.g., APHA 4500-N B).
2 standard methods = specified use of approved methods (e.g., APHA).
3 no methods = did not specify which method was used
Type = sampling technique used
1 composite sample collected
2 grab sample collected
3 unknown; type of sample collected was not specified
Frequency = frequency of sample collection
1 at least weekly
2 bi-weekly to monthly
3 less than one time per month
4 unknown
# Events = number of sampling events
1 more than 12 sampling events reported
2 between 3 and 12 sampling events reported
3 less than 3 sampling events reported
4 unknown; number of sampling events not reported
Season = time of year when study was conducted
Spring (Mar-May)
Summer (Jun-Aug)
Fall (Sept-Nov)
Winter (Dec-Feb)
All (Jan-Dec)
Data Evauation
1 more than a single average value reported (e.g., descriptive statistics provided)
2 only the average value reported for each constituent
Note: A blank cell indicates the data was not provided.
Data qualifiers were used to provide additional information related to the reported values. All data qualifiers are qualitative
and subjective. The qualitifers do not imply data ranking or data quality. The following key should be used to interpret the
data qualifier information. More detailed description and evaluation of the reported values using the data qualifiers can be
found in the companion report to this spreadsheet: Lowe, K.S., N.K. Rothe, J.M.B. Tomaras, K.E. DeJong, M.B. Tucholke,
J.E. Drewes, J.E. McCray, and J. Munakata-Marr (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream
from Single Sources: Literature Review. Water Environment Research Foundation, Project Report.
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment
Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
Source Type Description Reference Flag Flow Flow Flow Rate Total N Organic N TKN NO
2
gpcd gpd gpm mg-N/L mg-N/L mg-N/L mg-NO
2
/L
Single Source Domestic
Residential 39 39 44.1 43
Residential 51 154
Residential 104 30.3
Residential 105 44.5
Residential 110 39 156 44.1 43
Residential 128
Residential Summerfield 132
Residential Forest lakes 132
Residential Country club terrace 132
Residential The Pines 132
Residential Greenlefe 132
Residential 134 124.12 70.43 123.9
Residential Whitewater 134 62.07 35.07 62
Residential Fast 134 118.21111 68.96 118.2
Residential Home 1 (without disposal) 137 78 388 69
Residential Home 2 (without disposal) 137 66 331 61
Residential Home 3 (without disposal) 137 24 123 121
Residential Home 1 (with disposal) 137 71 374 63
Residential Home 2 (with disposal) 137 51 258 62
Residential Home 3 (with disposal) 137 29 148 189
Residential 138 64
Residential 138
Residential Home 1 139 31
Residential Home 2 139 49
Residential 140 32
Residential 140 34
Residential 140
Residential 141 32
Residential 142 58
Residential 150 a 50
Food
Restaurant 52 b 18
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
Restaurant 52 b, c 18
Restaurant 52 c
Non-medical
Prison 70 38.61 38.58
Rest Area Restroom 125 50
Rest area/Rv Dump 22 5300 116
Rest area/Rv Dump 31 5328 119
RV Dump 125 b 13.1 202
RV Dump 126
Multiple Residential
Housing Complex 117 g 200
Housing Complex 117 g 200
Housing Complex 117 200
Housing Complex 117 200
Housing Complex 117 200
Housing Complex 117 200
Housing Complex 118
Housing Complex 118
Mamquam Test Site 30 d 39
Multiple Residential 42 e 157 55
Multiple Residential 42 f 173 53
NSF Test Site Michigan 30
Other 123 h 188 80
a - Data also reported for different BOD forms, TOC, DOC, and metals (not included here)
b - Flow in gallons per day per seat
c - Removed entire observation with outlier
d - Onsite influent from over 20 different residences and commercial systems in British Columbia
e - Residential low flow toilets
f - Residential conventional toilets
g - Student housing
h - Laboratory used to simulate household waste
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
NO
2
-N NO
3
NO
3
-N NO
x
-N NH
3
NH
3
-N NH
4
NH
4
-N Total P Total P Ortho P Organic P
mg-N/L mg-NO
3
/L mg-N/L mg-N/L mg-NH
3
/L mg-N/L mg-NH
4
/L mg-N/L mg-P/L mg-PO
4
/L mg-P/L mg-P/L
1.1 19
1.8 8.8 9.4 11.3
1.1 20 19
0.1 47
0.1125 0.1575 53.47 11.65
0.0569 0.05 27.5 4.89
0.05 0.05 49.2 10.095
53 15.3
48 22.8
92 21.2
47 13.05
41 16.6
154 25.8
0.6 24.2
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
0.03 8.39
3.9 39
49
13
26
57
d - Onsite influent from over 20 different residences and commercial systems in British Columbia
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
Soluble P Reactive P PO
4
PO
4
-P Ortho PO
4
Total
Solids
Total
Suspended
Soilds
Total
Dissolved
Solids
Total
Volatile
Solids
Volatile
Solids
Volatile
Suspended
Solids
Volatile
Dissolved
Solids
mg-P/L mg-P/L mg-PO
4
/L mg-P/L mg-PO
4
/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
267
151
259 203
12 1180 396
12 267 653
14 200
44
69
18
60
38
2232.6
1295.8
1356.1
866 363 468
788 293 414
1249 473 659
997 478 571
859 360 485
1536 602 942
380
480
200
126
296
394
259
310
165
11.3 489 226 264 253 194
1030
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
371
358
117.5
50 1710 711 1114 642
682
825
114 6460 3847 4353 3329
3120 2460
320
217
345
196
317
202
310
306
180
228 836
477 1074
197
410
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
BOD
5
cBOD COD
Total
Organic
Carbon
Dissolved
Organic
Carbon
Total
Inorganic
Carbon
Oil &
Grease
Fats, Oil &
Grease
Fecal
Coliforms
Total
Coliforms E. Coli
Fecal
Strep.
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L cfu/100ml cfu/100ml cfu/100ml cfu/100ml
212
188 164
343
278 905
212 727 121 490000 860000
520 1000 3.00E+04 2.00E+06
157.4
30
46.5
120
105
1146.9 2404.2 460000
329.6 914.1 7365455
523.3 1842 602000
542 705 95
284 540 33
479 882 66
518 959 134
356 640 41
598 1133 92
435 65
490 89
241 21
146 16
415 122
465 129
343
330 81
207
304 495 108 42
1584 4520
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
1054 123
1045 123
170.9 137.8
670 1756 110
521
563
3080 6209 189
3110 8230
263
248
307
260
260
256
288
267
150
262
580
144
260 730
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
pH Alkalinity Hardness EC Conductivity Temp DO Tubidity Chloride SO
4
SO
4
-S Sulfide
mg/L as CaCO3 mg/L as CaCO4 S/cm Ohm/cm Celcius mg/L NTU mg/L mg-SO
4
/L mg-S/L mg-S/L
7.4 36
7.5 525 80
7.6
6.36
6
6.12
6.18
6.08
7.35 1856 17.15 0.825 716.3 19.42
8.37 1073 20.75 1.63 83.17 216.1
7.11 1702 21.16 0.922 1096.2 39.36
8
8
8.3
7.6
8.2
8.4
7.5
7.2
7.8
6.9 15.7 0.5 42
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
7.8
7.4
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
Ca Fe Mg K Na Al Zinc Cu Mn
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
0.1
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite Raw Wastewater
0.6
9
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Onsite STE
Source Type Description Reference Flag Flow Flow Flow Rate Total N
Organic
N TKN NO2 NO2-N NO3 NO3-N NOx-N NH3 NH3-N NH4 NH4-N Total P Total P Ortho P Organic P Soluble P Reactive P PO4 PO4-P Ortho PO4
Total
Solids
Total
Suspende
d Soilds
Total
Dissolved
Solids
Total
Volatile
Solids
Volatile
Solids
Volatile
Suspende
d Solids
Volatile
Dissolved
Solids BOD5 cBOD COD
Total
Organic
Carbon
Dissolve
d
Organic
Total
Inorganic
Carbon
Oil &
Grease
Fats, Oil
& Grease
Fecal
Coliform
s
Total
Coliform
s E. Coli
Fecal
Strep. pH Alkalinity Hardness EC Conductivity Temp DO Tubidity Chloride SO4 SO4-S Sulfide Ca Fe Mg K Na Al Zinc Cu Mn
gpcd gpd gpm mg-N/L mg-N/L mg-N/L mg-NO2/L mg-N/L mg-NO3/L mg-N/L mg-N/L mg-NH3/L mg-N/L mg-NH4/L mg-N/L mg-P/L mg-PO4/L mg-P/L mg-P/L mg-P/L mg-P/L mg-PO4/L mg-P/L mg-PO4/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L cfu/100ml cfu/100ml cfu/100ml cfu/100ml mg/L as CaCO3mg/L as CaCO4 S/cm Ohm/cm Celcius mg/L NTU mg/L mg-SO4/L mg-S/L mg-S/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
Single Source Domestic
Mobi l e Home 66 97 46.8 0.13 38.1 4.7 3.9 ####### 7.7 147
Mobi l e Home 66 31.4 0.78 27.7 3.1 2.6 ####### 8 125
Mobi l e Home 77 57 502 44 271 49 170 312 106
Resi denti al 11 househol ds 38 67 10 57 259 32 251189 158489
Resi denti al 9 househol ds 38 63 10 94 270 31 316228 199526
Resi denti al 40 174 63 46 299 2446562
Resi denti al 41 60.7 53.3 6.3 1608 75 295 62 135 351 99 7.2 479 327 45 59 33 218
Resi denti al 43 41.4
Resi denti al Cambri dge 45 73 291 1.3 32 8.9 38.2 102 7.2 374 40 6.9 41.2 0.067 14 11.7 89.7
Resi denti al Muskoka 45 32 62.9 0.083 57.6 13.1 71.3 90.3 6.7 316.4 54.8 11.8 14.3 0.248 3.4 21.8 84.9
Resi denti al House wi th l ow fl ow toi l et 47 94.4 59.3 10.8 861 1931
Resi denti al Bethel 48 53.1 30.4 0.3 22.4 #######
Resi denti al Spanaway 48 91.8 44.6 0.6 46.6 #######
Resi denti al Ti l l i cum 48 124 105 0.1 18.9 #######
Resi denti al Si te 10 49 37.6 8.9 55 139.6 #######
Resi denti al Si te 11 49 44.3 9.1 53 112.3 #######
Resi denti al Si te 12 49 78.3 11.3 66 160.6 #######
Resi denti al Si te 13 49 25.9 8.8 22 118.3 #######
Resi denti al Si te 14 49 33.7 5.2 22 160.2 #######
Resi denti al Si te 15 49 34.7 6.2 33 148.9
Resi denti al Si te 16 49 34.3 8 35 150.5 #######
Resi denti al Si te 17 49 6.8 27.4 26 71
Resi denti al Si te 18 49 51.1 12.3 163 193.3
Resi denti al Si te 19 49 36.9 6.1 41 161
Resi denti al Si te 2 49 32.2 7 48 80.2 75460
Resi denti al Si te 20 49 116.8 16.9 50 135.9
Resi denti al Si te 21 49 43.4 8.7 27 111.9
Resi denti al Si te 3 49 48.6 6.1 45 38.5 #######
Resi denti al Si te 4 49 39.4 9 60 95.2 #######
Resi denti al Si te 5 49 24.6 4 35 56.8 #######
Resi denti al Si te 6 49 40.2 6.5 73 100.6 #######
Resi denti al Si te 7 49 46.1 5.8 64 70.9 #######
Resi denti al Si te 8 49 97.8 10.9 64 66.9 #######
Resi denti al 53 85.8 75 10.3 57.7 10.3 78 189150 7.48 946 1207
Resi denti al 54 a 51 0.12 36 9 115 175 #######
Resi denti al 54 b 47 2.05 36 8 72 120 #######
Resi denti al 55 28.8 0.4 24.3 4.4 3.7 143 114 ####### 50.9
Resi denti al 55 27 0.4 18.7 1.9 1.5 80 172 ####### 70.1
Resi denti al 56 c 154 47.7 0.3 43.6 6.4 615 117 ####### 7.2 1040 40.4
Resi denti al 56 d 77 46.2 0.4 40.7 9 99.1 ####### 7.1 1100 35.5
Resi denti al 58 106 67 40 297 486400
Resi denti al 59 45 0.2 36 20 110 300 92 11000 3.5E+07 26000 7.92 418 4300 1051
Resi denti al 62 40.7 55 128 #######
Resi denti al 63 46.2 40.4 7.9 5.8 32.3 27.7 192 83.6 ####### 7.3 11.3 0.51 62 16.6
Resi denti al 63 70.3 66.6 9.3 7.8 68.5 56.8 193 72.8 ####### 7 14.7 0.5 62.2 18.8
Resi denti al 63 49.9 38.2 7.4 3.6 153.6 65.3 224 ####### 6.9 17.8 1 38.5 11.9
Resi denti al 65 0.8 41.7 15.7 58.6 3111.72 48.4
Resi denti al 68 58 0.7 47 1090 61 261 46 215 461 107 ####### ####### 7.4 433 1821 10.8 378
Resi denti al 69 0.07 37 44 297 #######
Resi denti al 71 42 <.5 92 162 315 #######
Resi denti al 72 26 3 39 3 200 116 #######
Resi denti al 72 34 1.12 46 34.75 58 330.85 #######
Resi denti al 73 39 0.08 11 161 141
Resi denti al 76 200 46.8 34.9 10.9 133.9 221.6 380.9 69.2 ####### #######
Resi denti al 77 50 728 63 263 25 81 157 41
Resi denti al 79 45.6 0.28 34 3.15 674 109.2 635000 7.46 1070 58.6
Resi denti al 81 0.32 38 3.36 575 116 1070 5.68
Resi denti al 82 61.8 61.8 <.1 47.8 72.9 160.2 ####### #######
Resi denti al Resi dence 1 83 191 57.1 56.9 0.02 0.18 37.8 240 149 ####### #######
Resi denti al Resi dence 2 83 113 59.2 58.4 0.02 0.81 35 38 197 ####### #######
Resi denti al Resi dence 3 83 139 45.67 45.6 0.02 0.04 35.5 79 188 ####### #######
Resi denti al Resi dence 4 83 194 193 222
Resi denti al Resi dence 5 83 176 71.9 71.8 0.03 0.16 53.3 276 378 ####### #######
Resi denti al Resi dence 6 83 161 51.8 51.3 0.02 0.56 36.1 91.7 125 ####### #######
Resi denti al Resi dence 7 83 174 70.9 70.5 0.02 0.38 55.9 171 348 ####### #######
Resi denti al Resi dence 8 83 47.2 47.2 0.02 0.24 32.56 203 322 ####### #######
Resi denti al 85 41.7 41.6 0.06 0.03 7 77 300 #######
Resi denti al 87 115 66 2 54 28 125 7.5 0.8
Resi denti al 88 10 43 1268 41 273 29 111 228 61 ####### ####### 7.6 2288 417
Resi denti al Resi dence 1 89 48.7 245
Resi denti al Resi dence 2 89 68.6 7.7 251
Resi denti al Resi dence 4 89 65.2 39.5 251
Resi denti al 90 170 240
Resi denti al normal fl ow 93 57 969 47 357 40 164 312 7.52
Resi denti al l ow fl ow 93 44 1594 76 381 46 174 323 7.1
Resi denti al 94 250 41.5 0.6 19.5 53 127 310 219000
Resi denti al 95 52.5 210 41 18.4 44 37 153 265
Resi denti al 96 15 7.7 38 5.5 239 630
Resi denti al 99 0.3 21 10 48 123 5011872
Resi denti al 99 0.1 19 8 39 109 6309573
Resi denti al 99 0.2 26 15 34 57
Resi denti al 103 0.026 96.9 11.6 176 280 568 73 6.9 53
Resi denti al 104 16 0.6 38.7 11.5 3.1 50.8 35.5 158
Resi denti al 106 73 913 134 397
Resi denti al Resi dence A 107 75 50.5 0.68 34.1 12.3 10.8 69 131 325
Resi denti al Resi dence B 107 125 57.8 0.46 42.5 14.1 13.6 44 176 361
Resi denti al Resi dence D 107 315 40.2 0.35 33.2 11 10.1 52 127 291
Resi denti al Resi dence F 107 150 56.7 0.83 38.3 11.6 10.5 48 122 337
Resi denti al 108 52.2 52 0.2 39 69
Resi denti al 115 e 165 45 44 298 #######
Resi denti al 115 f 53 65 351 #######
Resi denti al 115 e 43 51 226 #######
Resi denti al 115 f 54 87 246 #######
Resi denti al 115 e 39 64 202 #######
Resi denti al 115 f 50 66 249 #######
Resi denti al 116 161 62 0.7 50 87 60 192 458 147 #######
Resi denti al Resi dence 1 121 1.584 19.7 12.3 3.8 339 26.1 15.1 112 189 ####### 7 11.8 1.8 63.2 3.5
Resi denti al Resi dence 2 121 0.0693 31.8 24.7 14.2 366 26.7 19.3 123 251 ####### 7.1 13.3 1.3 146 5.5
Resi denti al Resi dence 3 121 0.1583 37.6 14.3 4.7 428 70.4 54.6 241 486 ####### 6.5 14.3 0.4 113
Resi denti al Resi dence 4 121 0.053 28.3 17.3 10.2 452 23.1 16.9 123 265 ####### 7 11.9 1.6 270 10.7
Resi denti al Resi dence 7 121 0.74 22 24 166 710 6.9 13 0 189
Resi denti al 122 0.0837 34 26.2 13.7 130 266 ####### 7.1 1.3
Resi denti al 127 0.3 20.9 10.9 45 33 120 289 ####### #######
Resi denti al 128 0.02 92* 10.5 165 280 550 ####### ####### 6.9
Resi denti al 129 0.56 38.7 11.5 54 158 360 #######
Resi denti al 130 135 140 335 17.08
Resi denti al 130 85 95 220
Resi denti al 131 62 23 260 260
Resi denti al 134 59.5 14.23 58.65 0.05 0.84 44.42 6.36 49.2 150.6 421.8 73012.6 7.029 1413.3 15.38 0.992 37.25
Resi denti al 135 105.7
Resi denti al 146 85 17 33 324 7.1
Resi denti al System 1 147 15 60 150
Resi denti al System 2 147 15 70 70
Resi denti al System 3 147 10 75 130
Resi denti al System 4 147 15 60 70
Resi denti al 149 0.1 88 9 94 6.4 356 860 53 9 9 27 39
Resi denti al 11 si ngl e fami l y homes 150 62 1.3 43 7.7 251 175 260 ####### 528
Resi denti al 5 si ngl e fami l y homes 150 69 2 66 10 102 332 496 ####### 676
Resi denti al 20 si ngl e fami l y homes 151 66 11 94 261 35 ####### ####### 15.1
Resi denti al 154 217
Food
Bar 111 78.5 451 413 23.6
Bar/Gri l l 92 450 61 7 79 179 449 49
Conveni ence Store, Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 42 253 223 36.8
Conveni ence Store, Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 36 472.5 382 12.1
Conveni ence Store, Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 50 427.5 341 9
Conveni ence Store, Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 73.2 4775 780 345
Dri ve In 111 230 454 2820 2466 77.65
Fast Food 113 72.9 68 410
Fast Food 113 24.2 105.8 74.2
Fast Food 113 100.1 227.5 792.5
Food Outl et / Bakery 111 292.5 866.5 678 91.4
Food Outl et / Bakery 111 226.5 302.5 390 74.5
Ful l Servi ce Restaurant 111 201 215 607.5 780 119.7
Ful l Servi ce Restaurant 111 247 1068 699 10
Restaurant 89 103 13.5 493
Restaurant 92 528 82 24 187 582 1196 101
Restaurant 92 64 14 65 245 622 40
Restaurant 92 1638 71 23 372 880 1667 144
Restaurant 92 30 15 247 377 772 101
Restaurant 92 766 78 28 125 693 1321 65
Restaurant 92 1558 73 19 66 261 586 47
Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 181 212 1095 1440 24.75
Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 73.5 555 510 1E+26
Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 3791 88.5 781.5 587.5 195.5
Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 352.5 639 684 71.2
Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 256 56.35 720 620.5 45
Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 94.5 312 387.5 11.9
Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 90.5 290 866.5 1030.5 68
Si ngl e Servi ce Restaurant 111 186.35 826.5 615 122
Medical
Assi sted Li vi ng Faci l i ty 113 49 80.2 291.8
Assi sted Li vi ng Faci l i ty 113 64 44.5 224.4
Assi sted Li vi ng Faci l i ty 113 38.8 22 128.5
Doctor 113 28.3 49 104
Doctor 113 105.4 50.8 149.8
Doctor 113 124.7 83 431
Nursi ng Home 113 32.4 53.5 290.7
Nursi ng Home 113 29 38.7 168.8
Nursi ng Home 113 41.2 126.2 402.4
Veteri nary/Kennel 113 57.5 46.7 108.8
Veteri nary/Kennel 113 56.5 32.2 249.7
Veteri nary/Kennel 113 42.2 10 138
Non-medical
Camp 114 4014 155 155 <.1 130 55
Camp 133 81.6 80.8 0.1 78 41.8 150.9
Campground Campsi te 148 0.05 97.9 11.8 57 34.1 83.6 0.599 12.9 20.6 42.8 0.1 0.069 0.029 0.048
Campus Chri sti an Center and Dorm 80 44.2 0.04 8.6 497 93.5 47.4 156 37153.5 3981.07 70
Combi nati on Resi denti al /heal th cl i ni c/casi no 57 54.7 54.7 0.073 55.6 196.8 167.3 23.3 #######
Conveni ence Store 114 436 31 30 1 24 28 207
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 60 85 13 46 266 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 a 175 83 <.1 70 11 34 244 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 b 223 84 <.1 71 12 39 248 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 c 147 7 <.1 70 11 36 224 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 d 236 103 <.1 94 16 53 309 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 e 227 78 <.1 68 12 39 255 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 f 221 72 <.1 66 11 34 209 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 g 212 89 <.1 84 15 54 286 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 h 155 116 <.1 84 20 75 302 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 i 253 84 <.1 71 12 37 253 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 j 280 78 <.1 71 11 36 250 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 k 235 103 <.1 94 16 53 310 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 l 250 96 <.1 86 15 37 308 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 m 230 84 <.1 71 12 39 248 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 n 232 79 <.1 73 11 38 257 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 o 218 98 <.1 83 16 52 310 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 p 99 87 <.1 81 16 54 278 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 112 q 193 103 <.1 93 16 52 314 #######
Correcti onal Faci l i ty 86 47 46 0 36 7 50 344 46 149 193 86 ####### 7 221 16 60
Dai ry Farm 41 cows 50 360 33 0.2 23 61 218 489 690 6.7
Dai ry Farm 130 cows 50 382 130 1 18 49 1293 3115 5080 6.1
Dai ry Farm 96 cows 50 545 141 0.7 77 82 1093 2755 4122 6.2
Dai ry Farm 45 cows 50 207 104 0.4 55 31 436 1329 1930 6.2
Dai ry Farm 54 cows 50 168 39 0.3 24 42 303 754 1116 7
Gol f cl ub 92 36 13 56 197 416 24
Gol f cl ub 92 3778 63 17 121 333 620 46
Gol f cl ub 92 845 36 10 44 101 227 33
Mari na B 143 440 400 42 644 1615 130 6.84 19.9
Mari na C2 143 140 200 15 118 108 6 7.14 21.1
Mari na Campground and mari na 143 400 400 37 395 737 40 7.2 24.6
Mari na D1 143 300 250 33 326 351 98 7 20.5
Mari na D2 143 68 80 6.9 130 9 8 6.89 361 20
Mari na E 143 820 890 96 901 3590 91 7 22.6
Mari na G 143 120 110 18 255 2906 49 6.99 23.9
Mari na J2 143 190 200 31 406 2500 9 6.25 21.1
Mari na L 143 830 800 78 657 1848 24 7.17 20.1
Mari na M1 143 680 700 67 1537 2035 140 7.08 22.4
Mari na M2 143 470 490 44 1117 1247 8 7.09 22.6
Mari na N 143 640 620 100 377 2463 240 6.96 23.7
Motel 92 14100 34 20 66 171 381 45
Museum One room school house turned i nto museum 109 34.2 33.5 150.3 97 >16000 7.7
Offi ce 83 30 73.5 72.8 0.05 0.65 50 33 161 ####### #######
Offi ce 113 97.6 44.7 137.2
Offi ce 113 130.6 83.6 280
Offi ce 113 192.1 55.6 276.8
Offi ce/Manufacturi ng 67 171 2 109 24 98 19.4 0.8 155
Offi ce/Manufacturi ng 67 109 2 86 41 60 15.5 1.5 117
Resi denti al /Church/School 91 35.9 57 44 8.1 85 168 338
Resi denti al /Church/School 91 41 36 157 276 65
Resi denti al /Church/School 91 48 50 32 52 118 228 16
Resi denti al /Church/School 91 75 189 284 22
Resi denti al /Church/School 91 34 26 11.4 47 129 268
Rest Area 59 185 0.3 167 51 173 510 170 380000 1500000 2400000 7.81 656 1860 114
Sawmi l l 83 3000 77.47 76.25 0.04 1.18 49 39.6 53.6 ####### #######
School 23 47 1 30 105
School 59 92 0.5 77 49 218 590 213 180000 2100000 182000 6.34 403 1230 93
School El ementary School 89 66 6.9 71
School El ementary School 89 47 4.1 28
School El ementary School 89 56 5.8 29
School El ementary School 89 42 5.9 37
School El ementary School 89 123 6.1 81
School 113 49.4 15.5 46
School 113 82.9 21 100.8
School 113 96.1 33.5 95.5
School 113 96.7 13.8 97.2
School 113 96.5 38.4 78.6
School 113 61.4 107.6 158.2
School 113 100.3 31.8 107.4
School El ementary School 144 152 128 9 31.8 7.6 107 2481 59 137 25 43 107
Shoppi ng Pl aza 89 28 5.5 65
Ski area Ski Area usi ng 0.5 gal /fl ush toi l ets 47 166 6.6 187 8.32
Store Grocery store wi th meat packi ng 133 77 75.6 0.1 1.4 60.9 118.7 649.7
Multi Residential
Apartment compl ex 119 11 48 5 1271 99 402 60 150 291 ####### ####### 8.4 2250mi croho/100ml 275
Cl uster System El kton 153 33.8 134
Cl uster System Gl i de STEP 153 55 112
Cl uster System Mi l l Ci ty STEP/STEF 153 41 0.18 33.1 48.9 111
Cl uster System New Mi nden 153 47 140
Cl uster System Starbuck 153 46 34 130
Cl uster System Steamboat 153 17 150
Cl uster System STEP system 153 34.5 129
Communi ty 124 55.9 0.6 55 6.02 72.6 219
Dupl ex 64 33 4.9 80 7.55
Dupl ex 64 26 0.63 25.7 23.8 145 ####### ####### 7.69 57
Housi ng Compl ex Student housi ng 117 200 61.2 195
Housi ng Compl ex Student housi ng 117 200 95.2 229
Housi ng Compl ex 117 200 60.8 191
Housi ng Compl ex 117 200 93 188
Housi ng Compl ex 117 200 46.9 177
Housi ng Compl ex 117 200 61 145
Housi ng Compl ex 118 63.7 195
Housi ng Compl ex 118 56.7 184
Mul ti -fami l y 60 59 7.9 27 184 #######
Mul ti -fami l y 60 33 5.4 64 63 #######
Mul ti -fami l y 5 si ngl e fami l y homes feedi ng one system 74 40 60 179
Mul ti -fami l y Mul ti pl e Mobi l e Home 75 35 30 80 95 170
Mul ti -fami l y 78 75.3 20.1 7.87 413 37 185 91 734 7.2
Mul ti -fami l y 101 29.8 6.83 <.05 0.238 24.7 8.18 94.9 ####### 7.36 3204 183
Mul ti -fami l y 102 5 0.07 0.64 21.6 10 84.8 122 233 ####### #######
Mul ti -fami l y Condomi ni um 145 <0.5 28 6.2 2511886 97 18 174
a - Wi nter
b - Summer
c - Oct. 1999 to June 2000
d - Oct. 1997 to June 1999
e - warm months
f - col d months
g - feb96-may96 start up
h - nov96-mar97
i - nov97-apr98
j - oct98-apri l 99
k - j ul y96-oct96
l - j une97-sept97
m - j une98-sept98
n - may99-j ul y99
o - oct96-may97
p - oct97-apr98
q - oct98-apr-99
r - mar96-apri l 96
s - nov96-may97
t - oct97-may98
u - sept98-apri l 99
v - j ul y98-sept98
w - oct98-may99
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Streamfor Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
Source Type Description Reference Flag Flow Flow Flow Rate Total N Organic N TKN NO
2
gpcd gpd gpm mg-N/L mg-N/L mg-N/L mg-NO
2
/L
Municipal 1 5.97E+05 33
Municipal 2
Municipal 3 8.43E+06 43
Municipal 4 4.00E+02 23.1
Municipal 5 2.12E+07
Municipal 6 2.20E+05 90
Municipal 7 8.00E+06 36 24.6
Municipal 8 5.00E+05
Municipal 9 105
Municipal 10 39.6
Municipal 11 1.16E+05 130
Municipal 12 2.40E+06
Municipal 13
Municipal 14 4.49E+08 92.5 88.4
Municipal 15 27.5
Municipal 16
Municipal 16
Municipal 16
Municipal 16
Municipal 16
Municipal 17 5.00E+06 44.9
Municipal 17 5.90E+06 52
Municipal 17 8.70E+06 24.7
Municipal 17 9.40E+06 25
Municipal 17 9.30E+06 28
Municipal 18 55
Municipal 18 65
Municipal 19 35.5
Municipal 20
Municipal 21 a 11 30
Municipal 24 b
Municipal 25 5.37E+06 22.4
Municipal 26 38.9
Municipal 27 32.5
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
Municipal 27
Municipal 27 36.6
Municipal 27
Municipal 27
Municipal 27
Municipal 27
Municipal 28 45
Municipal 29 c 219
Municipal 32 27.9
Municipal 33
Municipal 34 39.6
Municipal 35 1.68E+07 40
Municipal 36
Municipal 36 25
Municipal 36 152
Municipal 36 31
Municipal 36 34
Municipal 37 30
Municipal 98 d
Municipal 152 e, f 1.39E+02 50.8 50.8
Municipal 152 e, f 1.48E+02
a - Taken from WWTP influent
b - Municipal (Capehart Facility)
c - South African waste from meat packing plant
d - Municipal Influent
e - WWTP servicing approximately 260 homes (monthly samples)
f - Estimated average flow per household
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
NO
2
-N NO
3
NO
3
-N NO
x
-N NH
3
NH
3
-N NH
4
NH
4
-N Total P Total P Ortho P Organic P
mg-N/L mg-NO
3
/L mg-N/L mg-N/L mg-NH
3
/L mg-N/L mg-NH
4
/L mg-N/L mg-P/L mg-PO
4
/L mg-P/L mg-P/L
7.4
20.6 9.1
4.6
36 8.54
12.6
13.5
7.7
100
<1 36 7
4 59.5 6.7
15.5 5.3
9.8
12.3
10.1
5.7
9.3
22.9 6.7
37.8 7.5
12.5 3.1
13.9 4.1
15.4 4.9
27 3.8
31 4.9
0 3.57
21 7.1
0.1 0.1 19 3.2
8.1
12 5.3
6.3
25
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
20.6
13
15
33 40
8.7
0.3 26.4
27
23
26 6.1
19 5.3
35 14
24 6.5
25 8.5
0.1 1.5 23 3.8
0.07 36.2
28.3
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
Soluble P Reactive P PO
4
PO
4
-P Ortho PO
4
Total Solids
Total
Suspended
Soilds
Total
Dissolved
Solids
Total
Volatile
Solids
Volatile
Solids
Volatile
Suspended
Solids
Volatile
Dissolved
Solids
mg-P/L mg-P/L mg-PO
4
/L mg-P/L mg-PO
4
/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
206
121
428
128
2003
140
149
215
1700
250
77
539
140
6.1 223
7.8 283.5
7.7 238.3
2.5 279.7
6.3 338.3
244
316
235
266
196
125
251
6.5 220
282
225
62.65
217
299.9
5.4 184
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
292
3 302
3.6 158
3.9 192
6 359
196
270
3.4
4.1
12
6.3
5.8
148
267
288
385
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
BOD
5
Total
cBOD
5
cBOD COD
Total
Organic
Carbon
Dissolved
Organic
Carbon
Total
Inorganic
Carbon
Oil &
Grease
Fats, Oil &
Grease
Fecal
Coliforms
Total
Coliforms E. Coli
Fecal
Strep.
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L cfu/100ml cfu/100ml cfu/100ml cfu/100ml
240
428
342
146.4 7
797 2508
300
183 376
208
2650 4820
416
630
225
105
459 921
330
556.3
502
539.3
1830
662.7
177
216
159
195
156
121
284
220
563
178 >1600 >1600
8.16
159 404
170.5 446
221
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
210
294
172
117
237
203
500 1100
5470
172 374
260 555
148 244
148 312
196 406
186 487
199 289
135 255
301
264 634
369
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
pH Alkalinity Hardness EC Conductivity Temp DO Tubidity Chloride SO
4
SO
4
-S Sulfide Ca
mg/L as CaCO3 mg/L as CaCO4 S/cm Ohm/cm Celcius mg/L NTU mg/L mg-SO
4
/L mg-S/L mg-S/L mg/L
137
7.5
7.9 300
7.4 410
439.7
415.5
435.7
1938
354.3
191
6.8
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
274
7.3
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.
246807997.xls.ms_office, Municipal Raw Wastewater
Fe Mg K Na Al Zinc Cu Mn
mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L
Lowe et al. (2006). Influent Constituent Characteristics of the Modern Waste Stream for Single Sources: Literature Review. 04-DEC-1. Water Environment Research Foundation.