Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 75

Analysis of Risk and Return.

CHAPTER-1

INTRODUCTION

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM:


The stocks have risk, which comprises of either unique risk also called as
diversifiable risk or unsystematic risk and market risk also called as non-diversifiable risk
Or systematic. There are few problems, which reveal the necessity to analyze the risk
and return of the MF’s. we can neither predict the risk involved nor the future
performance of the stock. Many MF’s schemes have not performed well due to which
investor have incurred losses. The movement of BSE-100 index depends on the
performance of the company’s stock. If a particular industry is not in a booming stage,
then the stock of companies related to that industry would be affected. Given the
background of risk and uncertainty about investment in mutual fund, present study tries
to find out risk return on Reliance mutual fund in comparison with BSE-100 index has
been under taken.

“OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY:


• To study Mutual Fund Industry in India.
• To study the different Schemes provided by Reliance Mutual Fund.
• To study the performance of different schemes of the Company.
• To study the Risk involved in different Schemes.
• To study the Monthly Returns with respect to their Benchmark.

SCOPE OF THE STUDY:


• The study was limited to just finding the risk and returns associated with
the schemes.
• The study covers the six different schemes provided by Reliance Mutual
Fund. Are as : 1) Reliance Growth Fund-BSE100
2)Reliance Vision Fund-BSE100
3)Reliance Equity Fund-S&P CNX NIFTY

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 1


Analysis of Risk and Return.

4)Reliance Income Fund-Crisil Bond Fund Index


5)Reliance Liquid Fund-Crisil Liquid Fund Index
6)Reliance Gilt securities Fund-I-SecLi-Bex
• The study covers the period of past one and half years from Jan2004 to
Dec2008
• The study covers only the open-ended funds.

METHOD OF RESEARCH DESIGN TO BE USED UNDER STUDY IS:

DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH:
In this research an attempt has been made to analyze the past performance of the
Reliance Mutual schemes and to know the benefits to the investors. The study is to be
done on different schemes provided by the company to know the company’s performance
for the past few months and to know the risk and returns of the funds.

METHODOLOGY OF DATA COLLECTION:


DATA COLLECTED:
• Five Years monthly Navs of different schemes
• Five years monthly index of BSE-100& S&P CNX NIFTY

SOURCES OF DATA:
• Secondary source of data
The source of data were only the secondary source as the comparison of the schemes
were done keeping BSE sensex as the base and thus the project did not require any first
hand information in the form of primary source. The data were collected through, the
sources like the www.Reliancemutual.com for getting the NAV’s of past five years ,
announcement of publishing of company and other sites used in the project were
www.mutualfundsindia.com, www.bseindia.com and other internet sites, fact sheets of
various mutual funds.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 2


Analysis of Risk and Return.

TOOLS & TECHNIQUES USED FOR THE STUDY

• Beta:
• Standard deviation
• Alpha
• Sharpe Ratio
• Treynor Ratio

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN:

Sample unit: Schemes of Reliance Mutual Fund.


Sample size: Five years monthly Navs

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY:


• The study was limited only to Reliance Mutual Fund schemes.
• Only six schemes have been taken for analysis.
• The study was limited to the extent of just finding the risks and returns of
each schemes of the fund.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 3


Analysis of Risk and Return.

CHAPTER-2
COMPANY PROFILE
About Reliance Capital Asset Management Ltd.

Reliance Capital Asset Management Limited ( RCAM), a company registered under


the Companies Act, 1956 was appointed to act as the Investment Manager of Reliance
Mutual fund. .

Reliance Capital Asset Management Limited (RCAM) was approved as the Asset
Management Company for the Mutual Fund by SEBI vide their letter no
IIMARP/1264/95 dated June 30, 1995. The Mutual Fund has entered into an Investment
Management Agreement (IMA) with RCAM dated May 12, 1995 and was amended on
August 12, 1997 in line with SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996. Pursuant to this
IMA, RCAM is authorized to act as Investment Manager of Reliance Mutual Fund. The
net worth of the Asset Management Company including preference shares as on
September 30, 2007 is Rs.152.02 crores. Reliance Mutual Fund has launched thirty-five
Schemes till date, namely:

"Reliance Mutual Fund schemes are managed by Reliance Capital Asset


Management Limited. A subsidiary of Reliance Capital Limited, which holds 93.37% of
the paid-up capital of RCAM, the balance paid up capital being held by minority
shareholders."

Reliance Capital Asset Management Limited (RCAM) was approved as the Asset
Management Company for the Mutual Fund by SEBI vide their letter no
IIMARP/1264/95 dated June 30, 1995. The Mutual Fund has entered into an Investment
Management Agreement (IMA) with RCAM dated May 12, 1995 and was amended on
August 12, 1997 in line with SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996. Pursuant to this
IMA, RCAM is authorized to act as Investment Manager of Reliance Mutual Fund. The

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 4


Analysis of Risk and Return.

networth of the Asset Management Company as on March 31, 2008 is Rs 709.39 crores.
Reliance Mutual Fund has launched Forty Three Schemes till date, namely:

VISION STATEMENT

To be a globally respected wealth creator with an emphasis on customer care and a


culture of good corporate governance

MISSION STATEMENT

To create and nurture a world-class, high performance environment aimed at


delighting our customers.

ABOUT RELIANCE MUTUAL FUND

Reliance Mutual Fund (RMF) has been established as a trust under the Indian Trusts
Act, 1882 with Reliance Capital Limited (RCL), as the Settlor/Sponsor and Reliance
Capital Trustee Co. Limited (RCTCL), as the Trustee.

RMF has been registered with the Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
vide registration number MF/022/95/1 dated June 30, 1995. The name of Reliance
Capital Mutual Fund has been changed to Reliance Mutual Fund effective 11th. March
2004 vide SEBI's letter no. IMD/PSP/4958/2004 date 11th. March 2004. Reliance Mutual
Fund was formed to launch various schemes under which units are issued to the Public
with a view to contribute to the capital market and to provide investors the opportunities
to make investments in diversified securities
Reliance Mutual Fund (RMF) is one of India’s leading Mutual Funds, with Average
Assets Under Management(AAUM) of Rs. 71,094 Crores (AAUM as on 31st Oct 2008)
and an investor base of over 70.68 Lakhs
\

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 5


Analysis of Risk and Return.

The main objectives of the Trust are:

 To carry on the activity of a Mutual Fund as may be permitted at law and formulate
and devise various collective Schemes of savings and investments for people in India
and abroad and also ensure liquidity of investments for the Unit holders;
 To deploy Funds thus raised so as to help the Unit holders earn reasonable returns on
their savings and to take such steps as may be necessary from time to time to realize
the effects without any limitation.

RELIANCE MUTUAL FUND SCHEMES

Equity/Growth Schemes

The aim of growth funds is to provide capital appreciation over the medium to
long- term. Such schemes normally invest a major part of their corpus in equities. Such
funds have comparatively high risks. These schemes provide different options to the
investors like dividend option, capital appreciation, etc. and the investors may choose an
option depending on their preferences. The investors must indicate the option in the
application form. The mutual funds also allow the investors to change the options at a
later date. Growth schemes are good for investors having a long-term outlook seeking
appreciation over a period of time.
Debt/Income Schemes

The aim of income funds is to provide regular and steady income to investors.
Such schemes generally invest in fixed income securities such as bonds, corporate
debentures, Government securities and money market instruments. Such funds are less
risky compared to equity schemes. These funds are not affected because of fluctuations in
equity markets. However, opportunities of capital appreciation are also limited in such
funds. The NAVs of such funds are affected because of change in interest rates in the

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 6


Analysis of Risk and Return.

country. If the interest rates fall, NAVs of such funds are likely to increase in the short
run and vice versa. However, long term investors may not bother about these fluctuations.

Sector Specific Schemes

These are the funds/schemes which invest in the securities of only those sectors or
industries as specified in the offer documents. e.g. Pharmaceuticals, Software, Fast
Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG), Petroleum stocks, etc. The returns in these funds are
dependent on the performance of the respective sectors/industries. While these funds may
give higher returns, they are more risky compared to diversified funds. Investors need to
keep a watch on the performance of those sectors/industries and must exit at an
appropriate time. They may also seek advice of an expert.

EQUITY/GROWTH SCHEMES
Reliance Natural Resources Fund :
(An Open Ended Equity Scheme) The primary investment objective of the scheme
is to seek to generate capital appreciation & provide long-term growth opportunities by
investing in companies principally engaged in the discovery, development, production, or
distribution of natural resources and the secondary objective is to generate consistent
returns by investing in debt and money market securities.

Reliance Equity Fund :


(An open-ended diversified Equity Scheme.) The primary investment objective of
the scheme is to seek to generate capital appreciation & provide long-term growth
opportunities by investing in a portfolio constituted of equity & equity related securities
of top 100 companies by market capitalization & of companies which are available in the
derivatives segment from time to time and the secondary objective is to generate
consistent returns by investing in debt and money market securities.

Reliance Tax Saver (ELSS) Fund :


(An Open-ended Equity Linked Savings Scheme.) The primary objective of the

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 7


Analysis of Risk and Return.

scheme is to generate long-term capital appreciation from a portfolio that is invested


predominantly in equity and equity related instruments.

Reliance Equity Opportunities Fund :


(An Open-Ended Diversified Equity Scheme.) The primary investment objective of
the scheme is to seek to generate capital appreciation & provide long-term growth
opportunities by investing in a portfolio constituted of equity securities & equity related
securities and the secondary objective is to generate consistent returns by investing in
debt and money market securities.
Reliance Vision Fund :
(An Open-ended Equity Growth Scheme.) The primary investment objective of the
Scheme is to achieve long term growth of capital by investment in equity and equity
related securities through a research based investment approach.

Reliance Growth Fund :


(An Open-ended Equity Growth Scheme.) The primary investment objective of the
Scheme is to achieve long term growth of capital by investment in equity and equity
related securities through a research based investment approach.

Reliance Quant Plus Fund (Formerly known as Reliance Index Fund) :


(An Open Ended Equity Scheme.) The investment objective of the Scheme is to
generate capital appreciation through investment in equity and equity related instruments.
The Scheme will seek to generate capital appreciation by investing in an active portfolio
of stocks selected from S & P CNX Nifty on the basis of a mathematical model.

Reliance NRI Equity Fund :


(An open-ended Diversified Equity Scheme.) The Primary investment objective of
the scheme is to generate optimal returns by investing in equity or equity related
instruments primarily drawn from the Companies in the BSE 200 Index.

Reliance Regular Savings Fund

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 8


Analysis of Risk and Return.

(An Open-ended Scheme.) Equity Option: The primary investment objective of this
option is to seek capital appreciation and/or to generate consistent returns by actively
investing in Equity &Equity-related Securities.

Balanced Option: The primary investment objective of this option is to generate


consistent returns and appreciation of capital by investing in mix of securities comprising
of equity, equity related instruments & fixed income instruments.

Reliance Long Term Equity Fund:


(An close-ended Diversified Equity Scheme.) The primary investment objective of
the scheme is to seek to generate long term capital appreciation & provide long-term
growth opportunities by investing in a portfolio constituted of equity & equity related
securities and Derivatives and the secondary objective is to generate consistent returns by
investing in debt and money market securities.

Reliance Equity Advantage Fund:


(An open-ended Diversified Equity Scheme.) The primary investment objective of
the scheme is to seek to generate capital appreciation & provide long-term growth
opportunities by investing in a portfolio predominantly of equity & equity related
instruments with investments generally in S & P CNX Nifty stocks and the secondary
objective is to generate consistent returns by investing in debt and money market
securities.

DEBT/LIQUID SCHEMES

Reliance Monthly Income Plan :


(An Open Ended Fund. Monthly Income is not assured & is subject to the
availability of distributable surplus ) The Primary investment objective of the Scheme is
to generate regular income in order to make regular dividend payments to unitholders and

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 9


Analysis of Risk and Return.

the secondary objective is growth of capital.

Reliance Gilt Securities Fund - Short Term Gilt Plan & Long Term Gilt Plan :
Open-ended Government Securities Scheme) The primary objective of the Scheme
is to generate Optimal credit risk-free returns by investing in a portfolio of securities
issued and guaranteed by the central Government and State Government

Reliance Income Fund :


(An Open-ended Income Scheme) The primary objective of the scheme is to
generate optimal returns consistent with moderate levels of risk. This income may be
complemented by capital appreciation of the portfolio. Accordingly, investments shall
predominantly be made in Debt & Money market Instruments.

Reliance Medium Term Fund :


(An Open End Income Scheme with no assured returns.) The primary investment
objective of the Scheme is to generate regular income in order to make regular dividend
payments to unitholders and the secondary objective is growth of capital

Reliance Short Term Fund :


(An Open End Income Scheme) The primary investment objective of the scheme is
to generate stable returns for investors with a short investment horizon by investing in
Fixed Income Securities of short term maturity.

Reliance Liquid Fund :


(Open-ended Liquid Scheme). The primary investment objective of the Scheme is
to generate optimal returns consistent with moderate levels of risk and high liquidity.
Accordingly, investments shall predominantly be made in Debt and Money Market
Instruments.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 10


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Reliance Floating Rate Fund :


(An Open End Liquid Scheme) The primary objective of the scheme is to generate
regular income through investment in a portfolio comprising substantially of Floating
Rate Debt Securities (including floating rate securitised debt and Money Market
Instruments and Fixed Rate Debt Instruments swapped for floating rate returns). The
scheme shall also invest in Fixed rate debt Securities (including fixed rate securitised
debt, Money Market Instruments and Floating Rate Debt Instruments swapped for fixed
returns

Reliance NRI Income Fund :


(An Open-ended Income scheme) The primary investment objective of the Scheme
is to generate optimal returns consistent with moderate levels of risks. This income may
be complimented by capital appreciation of the portfolio. Accordingly, investments shall
predominantly be made in debt Instruments.

Reliance Liquidity Fund :


(An Open - ended Liquid Scheme) The investment objective of the Scheme is to
generate optimal returns consistent with moderate levels of risk and high liquidity.
Accordingly, investments shall predominantly be made in Debt and Money Market
Instruments.

Reliance Interval Fund:


(A Debt Oriented Interval Scheme) The primary investment objective of the
scheme is to seek to generate regular returns and growth of capital by investing in a
diversified portfolio

Reliance Liquid Plus Fund


(An Open-ended Income Scheme.) The investment objective of the Scheme is to
generate optimal returns consistent with moderate levels of risk and liquidity by investing
in debt securities and money market securities.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 11


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund –I


(A closed ended Scheme) The primary investment objective of the scheme is to
seek to generate regular returns and growth of capital by investing in a diversified
portfolio.

Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund -II


(An closed ended Scheme.) The primary investment objective of the scheme is to
seek to generate regular returns and growth of capital by investing in a diversified
portfolio.

Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund -III


(An Close-ended Income Scheme.) The primary investment objective of the scheme
is to seek to generate regular returns and growth of capital by investing in a diversified
portfolio

Reliance Fixed Tenor Fund


(An Close-ended Scheme.) The primary investment objective of the Plan is to seek
to generate regular returns and growth of capital by investing in a diversified portfolio.

Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund -Plan C


(An closed ended Scheme.) The primary investment objective of the scheme is to
seek to generate regular returns and growth of capital by investing in a diversified
portfolio.

Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund - IV:


(An Close-ended Income Scheme.) The primary investment objective of the scheme
is to seek to generate regular returns and growth of capital by investing in a diversified
portfolio

Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund - V:


(An Close-ended Income Scheme.) The primary investment objective of the scheme
is to seek to generate regular returns and growth of capital by investing in a diversified
portfolio of: -

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 12


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Central and State Government securities and


Other fixed income/ debt securities normally maturing in line with the time profile of
the scheme with the objective of limiting interest rate volatility

Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund - VI:


(An Close-ended Income Scheme.) The primary investment objective of the scheme
is to seek to generate regular returns and growth of capital by investing in a diversified
portfolio of: -
Central and State Government securities and
Other fixed income/ debt securities normally maturing in line with the time profile of the
series with the objective of limiting interest rate volatility

Reliance Fixed Horizon Fund - VII:


(An Close-ended Income Scheme.) The primary investment objective of the scheme
is to seek to generate regular returns and growth of capital by investing in a diversified
portfolio of: -
Central and State Government securities and
Other fixed income/ debt securities normally maturing in line with the time profile of the
series with the objective of limiting interest rate volatility.

SECTOR SPECIFIC SCHEMES

Sector Funds are specialty funds that invest in stocks falling into a certain sector of
the economy. Here the portfolio is dispersed or spread across the stocks in that particular
sector. This type of scheme is ideal for investors who have already made up their mind to
confine risk and return to a particular sector.

Reliance Banking Fund


Reliance Mutual Fund has an Open-Ended Banking Sector Scheme which has the
primary investment objective to generate continuous returns by actively investing in
equity / equity related or fixed income securities of banks.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 13


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Reliance Diversified Power Sector Fund


Reliance Diversified Power Sector Scheme is an Open-ended Power Sector
Scheme. The primary investment objective of the Scheme is to seek to generate
consistent returns by actively investing in equity / equity related or fixed income
securities of Power and other associated companies.

Reliance Pharma Fund


Reliance Pharma Fund is an Open-ended Pharma Sector Scheme.
The primary investment objective of the Scheme is to generate consistent returns by
investing in equity / equity related or fixed income securities of Pharma and other
associated companies.

Reliance Media & Entertainment Fund


Reliance Media & Entertainment Fund is an Open-ended Media & Entertainment
sector scheme.The primary investment objective of the Scheme is to generate consistent
returns by investing in equity / equity related or fixed income securities of media &
entertainment and other associated companies

EXCHANGE TRADED FUND

Reliance Gold Exchange Traded Fund:


(An open-ended Gold Exchange Traded Fund) the investment objective is to seek to
provide returns that closely correspond to returns provided by price of gold through
investment in physical Gold (and Gold related securities as permitted by Regulators from
time to time). However, the performance of the scheme may differ from that of the
domestic prices of Gold due to expenses and or other related factors.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 14


Analysis of Risk and Return.

CHAPTER-3

REVIEW OF LITERTURE

Mutual Funds - The Concept

A Mutual Fund is a trust that pools the savings of a number of investors who share a
common financial goal. The money thus collected is then invested in capital market
instruments such as shares, debentures and other securities. The income earned through
these investments and the capital appreciations realized are shared by its unit holders in
proportion to the number of units owned by them. Thus a Mutual Fund is the most
suitable investment for the common man as it offers an opportunity to invest in a
diversified, professionally managed basket of securities at a relatively low cost. The flow
Chart below describes broadly the work

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 15


Analysis of Risk and Return.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 16


Analysis of Risk and Return.

There are many entities involved a

Advantages of Mutual Funds

• Professional Management

1 • Convenient Administration

2 • Return Potential

3 • Low Costs

4 • Liquidity

5 • Transparenc

6 • Flexibility

7 • Choice of schem

8 • Tax benefits

9 • Well regulated

10 Disadvantages of Mutual Funds

• No control over the costs.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 17


Analysis of Risk and Return.

HISTORY OF MUTUAL FUNDS (WORLDWIDE):

When three Boston securities executives pooled their money together in 1924 to
create the first mutual fund, they had no idea how popular mutual funds would become.

The idea of pooling money together for investing purposes started in Europe in the
mid-1800s. The first pooled fund in the U.S. was created in 1893 for the faculty and staff of
Harvard University. On March 21st, 1924 the first official mutual fund was born. It was
called the Massachusetts Investors Trust.

After one year, the Massachusetts Investors Trust grew from $50,000 in assets in
1924 to $392,000 in assets (with around 200 shareholders). In contrast, there are over 10,000
mutual funds in the U.S. today totaling around $7 trillion (with approximately 83 million
individual investors) according to the Investment Company Institute.

The stock market crash of 1929 slowed the growth of mutual funds. In response to the
stock market crash, Congress passed the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. These laws require that a fund be registered with the SEC and provide
prospective investors with a prospectus. The SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission) helped create the Investment Company Act of 1940, which provides the
guidelines that all funds must comply with today.

With renewed confidence in the stock market, mutual funds began to blossom. By the
end of the 1960s there were around 270 funds with $48 billion in assets.
In 1976, John C. Bogle opened the first retail index fund called the First Index Investment
Trust. It is now called the Vanguard 500 Index fund. In November of 2000 it became the
largest mutual fund ever with $100 billion in assets.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 18


Analysis of Risk and Return.

History of Indian Mutual Fund Industry

The history of Mutual Funds in India can be broadly divided into 4 Phases:

1. First phase (1964-1987)

1 � The Unit Trust of India (UTI) was established in the year 1963 by passing an

2 Act in the Parliament.

3 �The UTI was setup by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and functioned under

4 the Regulatory and Administrative control of the RBI.

5 �The First scheme in the history of mutual funds was UNIT SCHEME-64,

6 which is popularly known as US-64.

7 �In 1978, UTI was de-linked from RBI. The Industrial Development Bank of

8 India (IDBI) took over the Regulatory and Administrative control.

9 �At the end of the year 1988, UTI had Rs.6,700/- Crores of Assets Under

10 Management.

2. Second phase (1987-1993)

1 �Entry of Public Sector Funds.

2 �In the year 1987, public sector Mutual Funds setup by public sector banks,

3 Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and General Insurance

4 Corporation of India (GIC) are came in to existence.

5 �State Bank of India Mutual Fund was the first non-UTI Mutual Fund.

6 �The following are the non-UTI Mutual Funds at initial stages.

7 �SBI Mutual Fund in June 1987.

8 �Can Bank Mutual Fund in December 1987.

9 �LIC Mutual Fund in June 1989.

10 �Punjab National Bank Mutual Fund in August 1989.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 19


Analysis of Risk and Return.

11 �Indian Bank Mutual Fund in November 1989.

12 �Bank of India Mutual Fund in June 1990.

1 �GIC Mutual Fund in December 1990.

2 �Bank of Baroda Mutual Fund in October 1992.

At the end of 1993, the entire Mutual Fund Industry had Assets under Management of

Rs.47, 004/- Crores.

3. Third phase (1993-2003)

1 �Entry of Private Sector Funds - a wide choice to Indian Mutual Fund

2 investors.

3 �In 1993, the first Mutual Fund Regulations came into existence, under which

4 all mutual funds except UTI were to be registered and governed.

5 �The Erstwhile Kothari Pioneer (now merged with Franklin Templeton) was

6 the first private sector Mutual Fund Registered in July 1993.

7 �In 1996, the 1993 Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Mutual Funds

8 Regulations were substituted by a more comprehensive and revised Mutual

9 Fund Regulations.

10 �The number of Mutual Fund houses went on increasing, with many foreign

11 mutual funds setting up funds in India.

12 �In this time, the Mutual Fund industry has witnessed several Mergers

13 &Acquisitions.

14 �The UTI with Rs.44, 541/- Crores. Of Assets Under management was way

15 ahead of all other Mutual Funds.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 20


Analysis of Risk and Return.

The following was the status at end of February 2003:

Number of schemes Amount (in Crores)


Open-ended schemes 32 82,693
1
Close-ended schemes 51 4497
TOTAL 37 87,190
2

(Source – AMFI website)

The diagram below shows the three segments and some players in each segment:

4. Fourth phase (since 2003 February)

1 �Following the repeal of the UTI Act in February 2003, it was (UTI)

2 bifurcated into 2 separate entities.

3 �One is the specified undertaking of the UTI with asset under management of

4 Rs.29, 835/- Crores as at the end of January 2003.

5 �The second is the UTI Mutual Funds Limited, sponsored by State Bank of

6 India, Punjab National Bank, Bank of Baroda and Life Insurance Corporation

7 of India.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 21


Analysis of Risk and Return.

8 �UTI is functioning under an Administrator and under the Rules framed by

9 the Government of India and does not come under the purview of the

10 Mutual Fund Regulations.

11 �The UTI Mutual Funds Limited is registered with SEBI and functions under

12 the Mutual Funds Regulations.

13 �With the bifurcation of the Erstwhile UTI, with the setting up of a UTI

14 Mutual Fund, confirming to the SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations and with

15 recent mergers taking

16

place among different private sector funds, the Mutual Fund Industry has entered its
current phases of consolidation and growth.

1 �At the end of September 2004, there were 29 funds, which manage assets of

2 Rs.1, 53,108/- Crores under 421 different schemes.

3 �At the end of March 2006, the status of Mutual fund Industry was:

No. of schemes Amount (in crores)


Open-ended schemes 41 1,85,999
4
Close-ended schemes 46 71,500
TOTAL 46 2,57,499
0

(Source – AMFI website)

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 22


Analysis of Risk and Return.

The following graph shows the amount invested in Mutual Fund Industry

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 23


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI)


With the increase in Mutual Fund players in India, a need for Mutual Fund
Association in India was generated to function as a non-profit organization. Association
of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI) was incorporated on 22nd August, 1995.

AMFI is an apex body of all Asset Management Companies (AMC) which has
been registered with Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Till date all the AMCs
are that have launched mutual fund schemes are its members. It functions under the
supervision and guidelines of its Board of Directors.

Association of Mutual Funds India has brought down the Indian Mutual Fund
Industry to a professional and healthy market with ethical lines enhancing and
maintaining standards. It follows the principle of both protecting and promoting the
interests of mutual funds as well as their unit holders.

The objectives of Association of Mutual Funds in India


The Association of Mutual Funds of India works with 30 registered AMCs of the
country. It has certain defined objectives which juxtaposes the guidelines of its Board of
Directors. The objectives are as follows:

1 �This Mutual Fund Association of India maintains high professional and ethical
standards in all areas of operation of the industry.

2 �It also recommends and promotes the top class business practices and code of
conduct which is followed by members and related people engaged in the
activities of Mutual Fund and Asset Management. The agencies who are by any
means connected or involved in the field of capital markets and financial services
also involved in this code of conduct of the association.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 24


Analysis of Risk and Return.

1 �AMFI interacts with SEBI and works according to SEBIs guidelines in the
Mutual Fund industry.

2 �Associations of Mutual Fund of India do represent the Government of India,


the Reserve Bank of India and other related bodies on matters relating to the
Mutual Fund Industry.

3 �It develops a team of well qualified and trained Agent distributors. It


implements a programme of training and certification for all intermediaries and
other engaged in the mutual fund industry.

4 �AMFI undertakes all India awareness programme for investors in order to


promote proper understanding of the concept and working of Mutual Funds.

5 �At last but not the least Association of Mutual Fund of India also disseminate
information on Mutual Fund Industry and undertakes studies and research either
directly or in association with other bodies.

The sponsors of Association of Mutual Funds in India


Bank Sponsored

1 �SBI Fund Management Ltd.

2 �BOB Asset Management Co. Ltd.

3 �Canbank Investment Management Services Ltd.

4 �UTI Asset Management Company Pvt. Ltd.

Institutions

1 �GIC Asset Management Co. Ltd.

2 �Jeevan Bima Sahayog Asset Management Co. Ltd.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 25


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Indian:

1 �Benchmark Asset Management Co. Pvt. Ltd.

2 �Cholamandalam Asset Management Co. Ltd.

3 �Credit Capital Asset Management Co. Ltd.

4 �Escorts Asset Management Ltd.

5 �JM Financial Mutual Fund

6 �Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Co. Ltd.

7 �Reliance Capital Asset Management Ltd.

8 �Sahara Asset Management Co. Pvt. Ltd

9 �Sundaram Asset Management Company Ltd.

10 �Tata Asset Management Private Ltd.

Predominantly India Joint Ventures:

1 �Birla Sun Life Asset Management Co. Ltd.

2 �DSP Merrill Lynch Fund Managers Limited

3 �HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd.

Predominantly Foreign Joint Ventures:

1 �ABN AMRO Asset Management (I) Ltd.

2 �Alliance Capital Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd.

3 �Deutsche Asset Management (India) Pvt. Ltd.

4 �Fidelity Fund Management Private Limited

5 �Franklin Templeton Asset Mgmt. (India) Pvt. Ltd.

6 �HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 26


Analysis of Risk and Return.

7 �ING Investment Management (India) Pvt. Ltd.

8 �Morgan Stanley Investment Management Pvt. Ltd.

9 �Principal Asset Management Co. Pvt. Ltd.

10 �Prudential ICICI Asset Management Co. Ltd.

11 �Standard Chartered Asset Mgmt Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Association of Mutual Funds in India Publications:

AMFI publishes mainly two types of bulletin. One is on the monthly basis and the
other is quarterly. These publications are of great support for the investors to get
intimation of the know how of their parked money. inly

SEBI REGULATIONS ON MUTUAL FUNDS

The Government brought Mutual Funds in the Securities market under the
regulatory framework of the Securities and Exchange board of India (SEBI) in the year
1993. SEBI issued guidelines in the year 1991 and comprehensive set of regulations
relating to the organization and management of Mutual Funds in 1993.

SEBI REGULATIONS 1993 (20.1.1993)

The regulations bar Mutual Funds from options trading, short selling and carrying
forward transactions in securities. The Mutual Funds have been permitted to invest only
in transferable securities in the money and capital markets or any privately placed
debentures or securities debt. Restrictions have also been placed on them to ensure that
investments under an individual scheme, do not exceed five per cent and investment in all
the schemes put together does not exceed 10 per cent of the corpus. Investments under all
the schemes cannot exceed 15 per cent of the funds in the shares and debentures of a
single company.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 27


Analysis of Risk and Return.

SEBI grants registration to only those mutual funds that can prove an efficient and
orderly conduct of business. The track record of sponsors, a minimum experience of five
years in the relevant field of Investment, financial services, integrity in business
transactions and financial soundness are taken into account. The regulations also
prescribe the advertisement code for the marketing schemes of Mutual Funds, the
contents of the trust deed, the investment management agreement and the scheme-wise
balance sheet. Mutual Funds are required to be formed as trusts and managed by
separately formed as trusts and managed by separately formed Asset Management
Companies (AMC). The minimum net worth of such AMC is stipulated at Rs.5 crores of
which, the Mutual Fund should have a custodian who is not associated in any way with
the AMC and registered with the SEBI.

The minimum amount raised in closed-ended scheme should be Rs.20 Crores and
for the open-ended scheme, Rs.50 Crores. In case, the amount collected falls short of the
minimum prescribed, the entire amount should be refunded not later than six weeks from
the date of closure of the scheme. If this is not done, the fund is required to pay an
interest at the rate of 15 per cent per annum from the date of expiry of six weeks. In
addition to these, the Mutual Funds are obliged to maintain books of accounts and
provision for depreciation and bad debts.

Further, the Mutual Funds are now under the obligation to publish scheme-wise
annual reports, furnish six month un-audited accounts, quarterly statements of the
movements of the net asset value and quarterly portfolio statements to the SEBI. There is
also a stipulation that the Mutual Funds should ensure adequate disclosures to the
investors. SEBI has agreed to let the Mutual Funds buy back the units of their schemes.
However, the funds cannot advertise this facility in their prospectus. SEBI is also
empowered to appoint an auditor to investigate into the books of accounts or the affairs
of the Mutual Funds.

SEBI can suspend the registration of Mutual Funds in the case of deliberate

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 28


Analysis of Risk and Return.

manipulation, price rigging or deterioration of the financial position of Mutual Funds.

SEBI REGULATIONS, 1996

SEBI announced the amended Mutual Fund Regulations on December 9, 1996


covering Registration of Mutual Funds, Constitution and Management of Mutual funds
and Operation of Trustees, Constitution and Management of Asset Management
Companies (AMCs) and custodian schemes of MFs, investment objectives and valuation
policies, general obligations, inspection and audit. The revision has been carried out with
the objective of improving investor protection, imparting a greater degree of flexibility
and promoting innovation.

The increase in the number of MFs and the types of schemes offered by them
necessitated uniform norms for valuation of investments and accounting practices in
order to enable the investors to judge their performance on a comparable basis. The
Mutual Fund Regulations is sued in December 1996 provide for a scheme-wise report
and justification of performance, disclosure of large investments which constitute a
significant portion of the portfolio and disclosure of the movements in the unit capital.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 29


Analysis of Risk and Return.

The existing Asset Management Companies are required to increase their net
worth from Rs.10 crores within one year from the date of notification of the amended
guidelines. AMCs are also allowed to do other fund-based businesses such as providing
investment management services to offshore funds, other Mutual Funds, Venture Capital
Funds and Insurance Companies. The amended guidelines retained the former fee
structure of the AMCs of 1.25% of weekly average Net Asset Value (NAV) up to Rs.100
crores and 1% of NAV for net assets in excess of Rs.100 crores.

The consent of the investors has to be obtained for bringing about any change in
the fundamental attributes of the scheme on the basis of which the unit holders had made
initial investments. The regulation empowers the investor. The amended guidelines
require portfolio disclosure, standardization of accounting policies, valuation norms for
NAV and pricing. The regulations also sought to address the areas of misuse of funds by
introducing prohibitions and restrictions on affiliate transactions and investment
exposures to companies belonging to the group of sponsors of mutual funds. The
payment of early bird incentive for various schemes has been allowed provided they are
viewed as interest payment of early bird incentive for early investment with full
disclosure.

The various Mutual Funds are allowed to mention an indicative return for
schemes for fixed income securities. In 1998-99 the Mutual Funds Regulation were
amended to permit Mutual Funds to trade in derivatives for the purpose of hedging and
portfolio balancing. SEBI registered Mutual Funds and Fund managers are permitted to
invest in overseas markets, initially within an overall limit of US $500 million and a
ceiling for an individual fund at US$ 50 million.

SEBI made (October 8, 1999) investment guidelines for MFs more stringent. The
new guidelines restrict MFs to invest no more than 10% of NAV of a scheme in share or
share related instruments of a single company. MF’s in rated debt instruments of a single

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 30


Analysis of Risk and Return.

issuer is restricted to 15% of NAV of the scheme (up to 20% with prior approval of
Board of Trustees or AMC). Restrictions in un- rated debt instruments and in shares of
unlisted companies. The new norms also specify a maximum limit of 25% of NAV for
any scheme for investment in listed group companies as against an umbrella limit of
25% of NAV of all schemes taken together earlier. SEBI increased (June 7, 2000) the
maximum investment limit for MFs in listed companies from 5% to 10% of NAV in
respect of open-ended funds. Changes in fundamental attributes of a scheme was also
allowed without the consent of three fourths of unit holders provided the unit holders are
given the exit option at NAV without any exit load. MFs are also not to make assurance
or claim that is likely to mislead investors. They are also banned from making claims in
advertisement based on past performance.

Types of Mutual Fund Schemes

Wide variety of Mutual Fund Schemes exists to cater to the needs such as financial
position, risk tolerance and return expectations etc. The table below gives an overview
into the existing types of schemes in the Industry.

By Structure

1 � Open - Ended Schemes

2 �Close - Ended Schemes

3 �Interval Schemes

1 By Investment Objective

Growth/Equity Schemes

0 General Purpose

1 Income/Debt Funds

2 Money Market

3 Guilt Funds

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 31


Analysis of Risk and Return.

4 Balanced Schemes

Other Schemes

� Tax Saving Schemes

�Special Schemes:

� Sector Specific Schemes

�Index Schemes

By Structure:

 Open-ended Funds:
An open-end fund is one that is available for subscription all through the year. These do
not have a fixed maturity. Investors can conveniently buy and sell units at Net Asset
Value ("NAV") related prices. The key feature of open-end schemes is liquidity.

 Closed-ended Funds:
A closed-end fund has a stipulated maturity period which generally ranging from 3 to 15
years. The fund is open for subscription only during a specified period. Investors can
invest in the scheme at the time of the initial public issue and thereafter they can buy or
sell the units of the scheme on the stock exchanges where they are listed.
In order to provide an exit route to the investors, some close-ended funds give an option
of selling back the units to the Mutual Fund through periodic repurchase at NAV related
prices. SEBI Regulations stipulate that at least one of the two exit routes is provided to
the investor.

 Interval Funds
Interval funds combine the features of open-ended and close-ended schemes.
They are open for sale or redemption during pre-determined intervals at NAV related
prices.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 32


Analysis of Risk and Return.

By Investment Objective:

 Growth Funds:
The aim of growth funds is to provide capital appreciation over the medium to long-
term. Such schemes normally invest a majority of their corpus in equities. It has been
proven that returns from stocks, have outperformed most other kind of investments held
over the long term. Growth schemes are ideal for investors having a long-term outlook
seeking growth over a period of time.

 Income Funds:
The aim of income funds is to provide regular and steady income to investors. Such
schemes generally invest in fixed income securities such as bonds, corporate debentures
and Government securities. Income Funds are ideal for capital stability and regular
income.

 Balanced Funds:
The aim of balanced funds is to provide both growth and regular income. Such schemes
periodically distribute a part of their earning and invest both in equities and fixed income
securities in the proportion indicated in their offer documents.
In a rising stock market, the NAV of these schemes may not normally keep pace, or fall
equally when the market falls. These are ideal for investors looking for a combination of
income and moderate growth.

 Money Market Funds:


The aim of money market funds is to provide easy liquidity, preservation of capital and
moderate income. These schemes generally invest in safer short-term instruments such as
treasury bills, certificates of deposit, commercial paper and inter-bank call money.
Returns on these schemes may fluctuate depending upon the interest rates prevailing in
the market. These are ideal for corporate and individual investors as a means to park their
surplus funds for short periods

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 33


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Gilt Funds

These primarily invest in Government Debt. Hence, the investor usually does not
have to worry about credit risk since Government Debt is generally credit risk free. The
investor is open to Interest risk, where the value of the securities changes in relation to
the market scenario. Sahara Gilt Fund is an example of one such scheme.

Tax Saving Schemes

Investors (individuals and Hindu Undivided Families (‘HUFs’)) are being


encouraged to invest in equity markets through Equity Linked Savings Scheme ("ELSS")
by offering them a tax rebate. Units purchased cannot be assigned / transferred/ pledged /
redeemed / switched - out until completion of 3 years from the date of allotment of the
respective Units. The Scheme is subject to Securities & Exchange Board of India (Mutual
Funds) Regulations, 1996 and the notifications issued by the Ministry of Finance
(Department of Economic Affairs), Government of India regarding ELSS. Subject to
such conditions and limitations, as prescribed under Section 80 C of the Income-tax Act,
1961, subscriptions to the Units not exceeding Rs.1, 00, 000 would be fully tax exempt
from income tax. The exemption under section 80 C of IT act is also applicable to other
eligible schemes. Sahara Tax Gain Fund is an example of ELSS.

Special Schemes

Sector Specific Equity Schemes:

These schemes restrict their investing to one or more pre-defined sectors, e.g.
technology sector. They depend upon the performance of these select sectors only and are
hence inherently more risky than general-purpose equity schemes. Ideally suited for
informed investors who wish to take a view and risk on the concerned sector. The Tata
Life Sciences and Technology Fund is an example of sector specific equity scheme.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 34


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Index schemes:

An Index is used as a measure of performance of the market as a whole, or a


specific sector of the market. It also serves as a relevant benchmark to evaluate the
performance of mutual funds. Some investors are interested in investing in the market in
general rather than investing in any specific fund. Such investors are happy to receive the
returns posted by the markets. As it is not practical to invest in each and every stock in
the market in proportion to its size, these investors are comfortable investing in a fund
that they believe is a good representative of the entire market. Index Funds are launched
and managed for such investors. And example to such a fund is the Tata Index Fund

FUTURE OF MUTUAL FUNDS IN INDIA

At the end of 2006 March, Indian mutual fund industry reached Rs. 2, 57, 499
crores. It is estimated that by 2010 March-end, the total assets of all scheduled
commercial banks should be Rs. 40, 90, 000 crores.

The annual composite rate of growth is expected 13.4% during the rest of the
decade. In the last 5 years we have seen annual growth rate of 9%. According to the
current growth rate, by year 2010, mutual fund assets will be double.

Going by the above facts and generally, mutual funds have often been considered
a good route to invest and earn returns with reasonable safety. Small and big investors
have both invested in instruments that have suited their needs. And so equity and debt
funds have attracted investments alike. The performance of the investments, equity in
particular, for the last one-year, has however been disappointing for the investors.

The fall in NAVs of equity funds, and it is really steep in some, even to the extent
of 60-70 percent, has left investors disgusted. Such backlash was only to be expected
when funds, in a hurry to post good returns invested in volatile tech stocks. The move,
though good under conducive market conditions, is the point of rebuttal now. Owing to

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 35


Analysis of Risk and Return.

volatility in market and profit warnings by some IT majors, tech stocks have been on the
downhill journey and the result is fall in NAVs of most equity funds.

This hurts the investor but then investments in equity are never safe. Mutual funds
are not just guilty of mismanaging their risks as the recent survey by Pricewaterhouse
Coopers indicates but also not educating their investors enough on the risks facing them.
It is for the mutual benefit of the investors as well as mutual funds that investor is
educated enough or else an agitated investor might route his investments to other avenues
that are considered safe.

Debt funds are safe investments and generate returns far in excess of what other so-called
safe avenues such as banks generate. Despite this, the inflow of funds in debt funds and
banks is by no means comparable. The factor contributing to this the lack of
understanding caused by improper guidance by the intermediaries.

Till now, Investor education has been one of the issues, less cared for, by the
industry. The industry focused upon the amounts and not why a person wanted to invest
or whether a particular product suited him or not. While educating the customer might
not have been on the cards earlier, the things are beginning to change now.

With SEBI passing on the guidelines, the funds will engage in investor education.
The guidelines state that funds will utilize the income earned on unclaimed money lying
with them for a period exceeding three years to educate the investors. AMFI has started a
certification program for intermediaries. This will be made mandatory for the
intermediaries and is aimed at educating the investors about the risks attached to the
schemes and to inculcate adequate skills into the intermediaries to help the investors
choose the right kind of fund. Steps such as these are aimed at obliterating various flaws
in the system by standardizing the knowledge base of intermediaries, as they are the
interface between the investor and the funds.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 36


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Although the investors themselves are also guilty of picking funds that were not
suited for them, the blame can’t lie square on their shoulders alone. The industry has also
got to bear some of it. With such programs becoming mandatory, it can be ensured to
some extent that ignorance ceases to be an aspect associated with the industry.

Till now, investors have been ignorant about the kind of fund to be picked or how
to select a fund. Teaching an investor how to select a fund is thus an important aspect.
Educated investors can, on their part, ask pertinent questions to find funds that qualify to
be in their portfolio as per their risk bearing capacity.

It would not be improper to say that investor education is still the key to managing the
funds handed over by investors. The investors are important to the industry and likewise,
mutual funds form an important avenue for an investor. It would thus be of critical
importance to educate people for an informed investor is in the best position to pick up
Schemes as per his need. This would also infuse some confidence in the minds of the
investors who under the current scenario seem to be losing faith on account of the falls
suffered in recent times. An educated and informed intermediary stands the best chance
of understanding the needs of the client and also of winning his confidence through
proper guidance. As it is, investor education will remain a key issue for mutual funds in
the longer run and educating the intermediaries will be the first step towards it.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 37


Analysis of Risk and Return.

RISK RETURN ANALYSIS OF THE SCHEMES

A rational investor before investing his/her money in stock analysis the risk
associated with the particular stock. The actual returns he receives from the stock may
vary from the expected one and thus an investor is always caution about the rate of risk
associated with particular stock. hence it becomes very essential on the part of investors
to know the risk as the hard earned money is being invested with the view to good return
on investment.
Risk mainly consists of two components.
• Systematic risk
• unsystematic risk

Systematic risk
The systematic risk affects the entire market. The economic conditional, political
situation, sociological change affects the entire market in turn affecting the company and
even the stock market. These situations are uncontrollable by corporate and investeors.

Unsystematic risk
The Unsystematic risk is unique to industries. It differs from industries to
industries. Unsystematic risk stems from managerial inefficiency, technological change
in production process, availability of raw materials, change in the customer preference
and labour problem. The nature and magnitude of above mentioned factors differ from
industry to industry and company to company.

In general view, the risk for any investor would be the probably loss from
investing money in any mutual fund.but when look at the technical side of its, we cant
just say these schemes/ fund carry risk without any proof. They are certain set formulas to
say the percentage risk associated with it.

There are certain tools or formulas used to calculate the risk associated with
schemes. These tools helps us to understand the associated wit the schemes. These
schemes are compared with the benchmark BSE 100

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 38


Analysis of Risk and Return.

THE TOOLS USED FOR CALCULATION


 Standard deviation
 Beta
 Alpha
 Sharpe ratio
 Treynor ratio

Arithmetic mean
AM=Σy/N
Where y= returns of NAV values
N= number of observation

Average returns that can be expected from investment. The Arithmetic returns is
appropriate as a measure of a central tendency of a number of returns calculated from
particular time i.e. for 5 years.

RETURNS
Investor wants to maximize expected retunes subject to their tolerance for risk.
Returns are the motivating force and principal reward in investment process and it is the
key method available to investors in comparing alternative the investments. Measuring
the historical returns allows investor to access the how well the stocks have performed.
Investor get returns either in form of interest, dividend or capital appreciation. There are
two terms, realized term and expected return. Realized return earned in past.

RETURN=( Closing price-opening price) /opening price*100

STANDARD DIVEATION
The Standard deviation is measure of the variables around its mean or it is square root of
the sum of the squared root deviations from the mean divided the number of observation.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 39


Analysis of Risk and Return.

S.D is used to measure the variability of return i.e the a measure of dispersion. S.D is
calculated as the square root of variation. In finance investments volatility.S.D is also
know as historical volatility and its used by investors as a gauge from the amounted of
volatility.

S.D=√(y-Y)²
N
Where y= return of portfolio
Y=average return of portfolio
N= number of months

BETA: Beta describes the relationship between the securities return and the index
returns.
1 Beta = + 1.0

One percent change in market index returns causes exactly one percent change in the
security return. It indicates that the security moves in tandem with the market.

1 Beta = + 0.5

One percent change in the market index return causes 0.5 percent change in the security
return. The security is less volatile compared to the market.

1 Beta = + 2.0

One percent change in the market index return causes 2 percent change in the security
return. The security return is more volatile. When there is a decline of 10% in the market
return, the security with beta of 2 would give a negative return of 20%. The security with
more than 1 beta value is considered to be risky.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 40


Analysis of Risk and Return.

1 Negative Beta

Negative beta value indicates that the security return moves in the opposite direction to
the market return. A security with a negative beta of -1 would provide a return of 10%, if
the market return declines by 10% and vice-versa.

Beta= N*Σxy-(Σx)(Σy)
N*Σ(x)²-(Σx)²
Where
N=No of observation
X=Total of market index value
Y=Total of return to Nav

ALPHA:
Alpha represent the forecast of residual return, which we consider the future
return of any portfolio. Alpha measures the unsystematic risk of a portfolio property
because the portfolio property also consists of both residual return and future expectation.

It is important to remember that the risk-free portfolio will always show a zero
residual return hence, any risk less security like cash will have always alpha equal to
zero. A positive alpha of 1.0 means the fund has outperformed its benchmark index by
1% correspondingly, a similar negative alpha would indicate an underperformance of 1%.
Alpha indicates that the stock return is independent of the market return .A positive
value of alpha is a healthy sign. Positive alpha values would yield profitable return.

The Formula is used to calculate:-


Alpha=Y-beta(x)

Where

Y-average return to nav return X-average return to market index

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 41


Analysis of Risk and Return.

SHARPE RATIO
The performance measure developed by William sharpe is referred to as the sharpe
ratio or the reward to variability ration. It is the ratio of the reward or risk to the
variability of return or risk measured by the standard deviation of return the formula for
calculating sharpe ratio may be stated as:
Sharpe ratio= Rp-Rf
S.D
Where,
Rp=Realised return on the portfolio.
Rf=Risk free rate of return.
S.D=standard deviation of portfolio return
Sharpe performance index gives a single value to be used for the performance ranking of
various fund or portfolio. sharpe index measures the risk premium of the portfolio
relative to the total amount of risk in the portfolio. The risk premium is the difference
between the portfolio’s average rate of return and the risk less rate of return. The standard
Deviation of the portfolio indicates the risk.
Higher the value of sharpe ratio better the fund has performed. Sharpe ratio can be used
to rank the desirability of fund or portfolio. The fund that has performed well compared
to other will be rank first than others.

Treynor ratio
The performance measure by jack. Treynor is referred to as Treynor ratio or
reward to volatility ratio. It is the ratio of the reward or risk premium to the volatility of
return as measuring by the portfolio beta. The formula for calculating Treynor ratio may
be stated as:
Treynor ratio= Rp-Rf
Beta
Where:
Rp= realized return on the portfolio
Rf= risk free rate of return
Beta=portfolio beta.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 42


Analysis of Risk and Return.

CHAPTER-4
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

1) RELIANCE GROWTH FUND:


Benchmark -100
RETURN 0F PORTFOLIO MARKET RETURN
DATE NAV Rp(y) (y-Y) (y-Y)² INDEX Rm(x) (x*X) x*y
Jan 04 34.95 2946.14
Feb 04 35.5 1.5737 0.36844 0.136 2923.99 -0.7518 0.5653 -1.1831
Mar 04 27.99 -21.155 -22.36 500 2966.31 1.44734 2.0948 -30.618
Apr 04 29.83 6.5738 5.36854 28.82 3025.14 1.98327 3.9334 13.038
May 04 25.59 -14.214 -15.419 237.7 2658.23 -12.129 147.11 172.4
Jun 04 25.88 1.1333 -0.072 0.005 2561.16 -3.6517 13.335 -4.1383
Jul 04 28.31 9.3895 8.18426 66.98 2755.22 7.57704 57.411 71.144
Aug 04 31.23 10.314 9.10914 82.98 2789.07 1.22858 1.5094 12.672
Sep 04 32.93 5.4435 4.23825 17.96 2997.07 7.45768 55.617 40.596
Oct 04 30.48 -7.44 -8.6453 74.74 3027.96 1.03067 1.0623 -7.6682
Nov 04 33.52 9.9738 8.76852 76.89 3339.75 10.297 106.03 102.7
Dec 04 35.41 5.6384 4.43319 19.65 3580.34 7.20383 51.895 40.618
TOTAL 7.2314 1106 TOTAL 21.693 440.56
Y=Σy/12 1.2052 X=Σx/12 1.9721

4000 40

3500 35

3000 30

2500 25
index
2000 20
Navs
1500 15

1000 10

500 5

0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance growth fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 43


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Dec 04 35.41 3580.34


Jan 05 35.35 -0.1694 -3.1427 9.877 3521.71 -1.6376 2.6816 0.2775
Feb 05 37.91 7.2419 4.26861 18.22 3611.9 2.56097 6.5586 18.546
Mar 05 32.61 -13.98 -16.954 287.4 3481.86 -3.6003 12.962 50.334
Apr 05 33.66 3.2199 0.24661 0.061 3313.45 -4.8368 23.394 -15.574
May 05 36.16 7.4272 4.45396 19.84 3601.73 8.7003 75.695 64.619
Jun 05 36.75 1.6316 -1.3416 1.8 3800.24 5.51152 30.377 8.9928
Jul 05 41.13 11.918 8.94511 80.01 4072.15 7.15507 51.195 85.277
Aug 05 45.72 11.16 8.18648 67.02 4184.83 2.76709 7.6568 30.88
Sep 05 47.57 4.0464 1.07311 1.152 4566.63 9.12343 83.237 36.917
Oct 05 42.94 -9.733 -12.706 161.4 4159.59 -8.9134 79.448 86.754
Nov 05 47.74 11.178 8.20513 67.32 4649.87 11.7867 138.93 131.76
Dec 05 48.57 1.7386 -1.2347 1.524 4953.28 6.52513 42.577 11.344
TOTAL 35.679 715.7 TOTAL 35.1422 554.71 509.85
Y=Σy/12 2.9733 X=Σx/12 2.92852

6000 60

5000 50

4000 40

index
3000 30
Navs

2000 20

1000 10

0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance growth fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 44


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Dec 05 48.57 4953.28


Jan 06 52.1 7.2679 5.69572 32.44 5224.97 5.48505 30.086 39.865
Feb 06 52.82 1.382 -0.1902 0.036 5422.67 3.78375 14.317 5.229
Mar 06 51.42 -2.6505 -4.2227 17.83 5904.17 8.87939 78.844 -23.535
Apr 06 55.34 7.6235 6.05135 36.62 6251.39 5.88093 34.585 44.833
May 06 49.36 -10.806 -12.378 153.2 5385.21 -13.856 191.98 149.72
Jun 06 44.66 -9.5219 -11.094 123.1 5382.11 -0.0576 0.0033 0.5481
Jul 06 43.34 -2.9557 -4.5278 20.5 5422.39 0.74841 0.5601 -2.212
Aug 06 48.34 11.537 9.96454 99.29 5933.77 9.4309 88.942 108.8
Sep 06 52.55 8.7091 7.137 50.94 6328.33 6.6494 44.214 57.911
Oct 06 53.08 1.0086 -0.5636 0.318 6603.6 4.3498 18.921 4.3871
Nov 06 55.1 3.8056 2.23343 4.988 6931.05 4.95866 24.588 18.871
Dec 06 57.01 3.4664 1.89428 3.588 6982.58 0.74347 0.5527 2.5772
TOTAL 18.866 542.8 TOTAL 36.9964 527.6 407
Y=Σy/12 1.5721 X=Σx/12 3.08303

6000 60

5000 50

4000 40
index

3000 30 Nav

2000 20

1000 10

0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance growth fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 45


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Dec 06 57.01 6982.58


Jan 07 59.12 3.7011 0.30373 0.092 7145.91 2.33911 5.4714 8.6573
Feb 07 55.73 -5.7341 -9.1315 83.38 6527.12 -8.6594 74.984 49.654
Mar 07 47.86 -14.122 -17.519 306.9 6587.21 0.92062 0.8475 -13.001
Apr 07 50.8 6.1429 2.74554 7.538 7032.93 6.76645 45.785 41.566
May 07 54.29 6.8701 3.4727 12.06 7468.7 6.19614 38.392 42.568
Jun 07 56.7 4.4391 1.04175 1.085 7605.37 1.8299 3.3485 8.1232
Jul 07 59.77 5.4145 2.01709 4.069 8004.05 5.24209 27.479 28.383
Aug 07 53.86 -9.8879 -13.285 176.5 7857.61 -1.8296 3.3473 18.091
Sep 07 60.06 11.511 8.11395 65.84 8967.41 14.1239 199.48 162.58
Oct 07 69.89 16.367 12.9696 168.2 10391.19 15.8773 252.09 259.86
Nov 07 72.38 3.5627 0.16537 0.027 10384.4 -0.0653 0.0043 -0.2328
Dec 07 81.43 12.503 9.10608 82.92 11154.28 7.41381 54.965 92.698
TOTAL 40.769 908.6 TOTAL 50.155 706.2 698.95
Y=Σy/12 3.3974 X=Σx/12 4.17958

12000 90

80
10000
70

8000 60

50 index
6000
40 Navs

4000 30

20
2000
10

0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance growth fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 46


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Dec 07 81.43 11154.28


Jan 08 67.48 -17.1313 -10.291 105.9 9440.94 -15.36 235.94 263.14
Feb 08 65.61 -2.77119 4.06905 16.56 9404.98 -0.3809 0.1451 1.0555
Mar 08 65.61 0 6.84025 46.79 8232.82 -12.463 155.33 0
Apr 08 56.16 -14.4033 -7.563 57.2 9199.46 11.7413 137.86 -169.11
May 08 53.7 -4.38034 2.4599 6.051 8683.27 -5.6111 31.484 24.578
Jun 08 45.81 -14.6927 -7.8525 61.66 7029.27 -19.048 362.83 279.87
Jul 08 48.2036 5.22506 12.0653 145.6 7488.48 6.53283 42.678 34.134
Aug 08 48.4178 0.44437 7.28461 53.07 7621.4 1.77499 3.1506 0.7887
Sep 08 42.6755 -11.8599 -5.0196 25.2 6621.57 -13.119 172.1 155.59
Oct 08 33.1429 -22.3374 -15.497 240.2 4953.98 -25.184 634.24 562.55
Nov 08 30.471 -8.06176 -1.2215 1.492 4600.45 -7.1363 50.927 57.531
Dec 08 32.8738 7.88553 14.7258 216.8 4988.04 8.42505 70.981 66.436
TOTAL -82.0829 976.5 TOTAL -69.829 1897.7 1276.6
Y=Σy/12 -6.84025 X=Σx/12 10.5004

10000 80
9000
70
8000
60
7000
50
6000
index
5000 40
Navs
4000 30
3000
20
2000
1000 10

0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance growth fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

1) STANDARD DEVIATION

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 47


Analysis of Risk and Return.

S.D= √ (y-Y)
N

STANDARD
DEVIATION
YEAR (y-Y)² y-Y)²/N Square root (S.D)
2004 1102.589 91.88242 9.5855

2005 715.7085 59.64238 7.7228

2006 542.8451 45.23709 6.7258

2007 908.6373 75.71978 8.7017

2008 76.5005 81.37504 9.0208

2) BETA
β = N *ΣXY-(ΣX)(ΣY)

NΣX²-(ΣX)²
BETA
YEAR N* Σ XY (ΣX) ( ΣY) NΣx² (ΣX)² β
2004 5286.72 21.69324 7.231404 5286.692 470.5966 0.9878
2005 6118.165 35.14223 35.67909 6656.522 1234.977 0.8972

2006 4883.992 36.99639 18.86572 6331.154 1368.733 0.8435

2007 8387.444 50.15499 40.76851 8474.359 2515.523 1.0644

2008 15318.71 -69.8287 -82.0829 22772.07 4876.05 0.5357

3) ALPHA

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 48


Analysis of Risk and Return.

α =Y-β(X)

ALPHA
YEAR Y β X α =Y-β(X)
2004 1.205234 0.9878 1.972113 -0.742819

2005 2.973257 0.8972 2.928519 0.34579

2006 1.572144 0.8435 3.083033 -1.02839

2007 3.397376 1.0644 4.179583 -`1.0513

2008 -6.84025 0.5357 -5.81906 -3.7229

4)SHARPE RATIO

SR=Rp-Rf/SD

Where;
Rp= (Closing Nav/opening Nav-1)

SHARPE
RATIO
YEAR Rp Rf SD SR
2004 5 9.5855
1.316166 -0.38431

2005 37.39745 5.1 7.7228


4.182091

2006 9.424184 5.7 6.7258


0.553716

2007 37.73681 7 8.7017 3.532276

2008 -51.2836 7.5 9.0208 -6.51645

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 49


Analysis of Risk and Return.

5)TREYNOR RATIO

TR=Rp-Rf/β
TREY
NOR RATIO
YEAR Rp Rf β TR
2004 5 0.9878 -3.72933
1.316166

2005 37.39745 5.1 0.8972 35.9905

2006 9.424184 5.7 0.8435 4.415156

2007 37.73681 7 1.0644 28.87712

2008 -51.2836 7.5 0.5357 -109.732

INTERPRETATION

In the year 2004 standard deviation was high at the rate of 9.5855 and in the year 2006
standard deviation was low at the rate of 6.7258. in the year 2007 β is 1.0644 which is
high risk because β greater than 1 in the year 2008 β value is 0.5357it is less risky
because it is less than 1 . In the year 2005 sharpe index was higher at the rate of 4.182091
and in the year 2008 sharpe index was less at the rate of -6.51645. in the year 2005
treynor index was higher at the rate of 35.9905 and in the year 2008 treynor index was
less at the rate of -109.732 .

2)RELIANCE VISION FUND

Benchmark -100

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 50


Analysis of Risk and Return.

RETURN OF PORTFOLIO MARKET RETURN


DATE NAV RP(y) y-Y) (y-Y) INDEX Rm(X) (x*x) x*y
Jan 04 63.69 2946.14
Feb 04 65.39 2.6692 0.0647 0.00418 2923.99 -0.7518 0.5653 -2.0068
Mar 04 63.11 -3.4868 -6.0913 37.1036 2966.31 1.44734 2.0948 -5.0465
Apr 04 65.34 3.5335 0.929 0.86307 3025.14 1.98327 3.9334 7.00792
May 04 54.44 -16.682 -19.286 371.968 2658.23 -12.129 147.11 202.331
Jun 04 56.26 3.3431 0.7386 0.54557 2561.16 -3.6517 13.335 -12.208
Jul 04 60.9 8.2474 5.6429 31.8426 2755.22 7.57704 57.411 62.491
Aug 04 63.94 4.9918 2.3873 5.69915 2789.07 1.22858 1.5094 6.1328
Sep 04 68.7 7.4445 4.84 23.4254 2997.07 7.45768 55.617 55.5186
Oct 04 68.89 0.2766 -2.3279 5.41928 3027.96 1.03067 1.0623 0.28505
Nov 04 74.76 8.5208 5.9163 35.003 3339.75 10.297 106.03 87.7393
Dec 04 82.08 9.7913 7.1868 51.6506 3580.34 7.20383 51.895 70.5351
TOTAL 28.649 563.524 TOTAL 21.6932 440.56 472.779
Y=Σy/12 2.6045 X=Σx/12 1.97211

4000 90

3500 80

70
3000
60
2500
50 index
2000
40 Navs
1500
30
1000
20

500 10

0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance vision fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

Dec 04 82.08 3580.34


Jan 05 83.14 1.2914 -2.4937 6.21847 3521.71 -1.6376 2.6816 -2.1148

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 51


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Feb 05 88.96 7.0002 3.2151 10.3371 3611.9 2.56097 6.5586 17.9274


Mar 05 86.7 -2.5405 -6.3256 40.0129 3481.86 -3.6003 12.962 9.1465
Apr 05 86.1 -0.692 -4.4772 20.0449 3313.45 -4.8368 23.394 3.34725
May 05 91.64 6.4344 2.6493 7.01863 3601.73 8.7003 75.695 55.981
Jun 05 91.49 -0.1637 -3.9488 15.593 3800.24 5.51152 30.377 -0.9021
Jul 05 99.74 9.0174 5.2323 27.3767 4072.15 7.15507 51.195 64.52
Aug 05 104.82 5.0932 1.3081 1.71121 4184.83 2.76709 7.6568 14.0935
Sep 05 114.32 9.0632 5.278 27.8578 4566.63 9.12343 83.237 82.6871
Oct 05 105.35 -7.8464 -11.632 135.292 4159.59 -8.9134 79.448 69.9377
Nov 05 118.05 12.055 8.2699 68.392 4649.87 11.7867 138.93 142.09
Dec 05 125.97 6.709 2.9239 8.54927 4953.28 6.52513 42.577 43.7772
TOTAL 45.421 368.404 TOTAL 35.1422 1235 500.491
Y=Σy/12 3.7851 X=Σx/12 2.92852

6000 140

5000 120

100
4000
80
index
3000
60 Navs

2000
40

1000 20

0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance vision fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

Dec 05 125.97 4953.28


Jan 06 134.38 6.6762 3.2654 10.6627 5224.97 5.48505 30.086 36.6193

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 52


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Feb 06 139.26 3.6315 0.2207 0.0487 5422.67 3.78375 14.317 13.7407


Mar 06 155.75 11.841 8.4304 71.0708 5904.17 8.87939 78.844 105.142
Apr 06 165.65 6.3563 2.9455 8.67615 6251.39 5.88093 34.585 37.3812
May 06 141.84 -14.374 -17.784 316.288 5385.21 -13.856 191.98 199.159
Jun 06 137.65 -2.954 -6.3648 40.5112 5382.11 -0.0576 0.0033 0.17005
Jul 06 138.85 0.8718 -2.539 6.44669 5422.39 0.74841 0.5601 0.65244
Aug 06 150.99 8.7432 5.3324 28.4349 5933.77 9.4309 88.942 82.4567
Sep 06 160.53 6.3183 2.9075 8.45349 6328.33 6.6494 44.214 42.0129
Oct 06 171.09 6.5782 3.1674 10.0324 6603.6 4.3498 18.921 28.6139
Nov 06 174.93 2.2444 -1.1664 1.36044 6931.05 4.95866 24.588 11.1294
Dec 06 183.67 4.9963 1.5855 2.51373 6982.58 0.74347 0.5527 3.71457
TOTAL 40.93 504.499 TOTAL 36.9964 1368.7 560.792
Y=Σy/12 3.4108 X=Σx/12 3.08303

8000 200
180
7000
160
6000
140
5000
120
index
4000 100
Navs
3000 80
60
2000
40
1000 20
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance vision fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

Dec 06 183.67 6982.58


Jan 07 184.14 0.2559 -3.7235 13.8641 7145.91 2.33911 5.4714 0.59856

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 53


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Feb 07 171.42 -6.9078 -10.887 118.53 6527.12 -8.6594 74.984 59.817


Mar 07 169.69 -1.0092 -4.9886 24.8858 6587.21 0.92062 0.8475 -0.9291
Apr 07 183.8 8.3152 4.3358 18.7992 7032.93 6.76645 45.785 56.2641
May 07 200 8.8139 4.8346 23.3731 7468.7 6.19614 38.392 54.6123
Jun 07 207.32 3.66 -0.3194 0.10199 7605.37 1.8299 3.3485 6.69745
Jul 07 219.24 5.7496 1.7702 3.13365 8004.05 5.24209 27.479 30.1397
Aug 07 214.28 -2.2624 -6.2417 38.959 7857.61 -1.8296 3.3473 4.13916
Sep 07 235.29 9.8049 5.8256 33.9373 8967.41 14.1239 199.48 138.484
Oct 07 267.61 13.736 9.7569 95.1968 10391.2 15.8773 252.09 218.094
Nov 07 264.45 -1.1808 -5.1602 26.6274 10384.4 -0.0653 0.0043 0.07716
Dec 07 287.66 8.7767 4.7974 23.0146 11154.3 7.41381 54.965 65.0689
TOTAL 47.752 420.423 TOTAL 50.155 706.2 633.063
Y=Σy/12 3.9794 X=Σx/12 4.17958

12000 350

10000 300

250
8000
200 index
6000
150 Navs

4000
100

2000 50

0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance vision fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

Dec 07 287.66 11154.3


Jan 08 246.44 -14.329 -8.9084 79.3603 9440.94 -15.36 235.94 220.105
Feb 08 240.47 -2.4225 2.9985 8.99089 9404.98 -0.3809 0.1451 0.92271

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 54


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Mar 08 206.12 -14.285 -8.8635 78.5625 8232.82 -12.463 155.33 178.031


Apr 08 221.46 7.4423 12.863 165.463 9199.46 11.7413 137.86 87.3819
May 08 211.84 -4.3439 1.0771 1.1601 8683.27 -5.6111 31.484 24.374
Jun 08 172.07 -18.774 -13.353 178.293 7029.27 -19.048 362.83 357.602
Jul 08 184.291 7.1023 12.523 156.832 7488.48 6.53283 42.678 46.398
Aug 08 186.232 1.0534 6.4744 41.9174 7621.4 1.77499 3.1506 1.86976
Sep 08 167.538 -10.038 -4.6171 21.3175 6621.57 -13.119 172.1 131.686
Oct 08 133.547 -20.289 -14.868 221.053 4953.98 -25.184 634.24 510.958
Nov 08 128.826 -3.5352 1.8858 3.55627 4600.45 -7.1363 50.927 25.228
Dec 08 138.315 7.3663 12.787 163.515 4988.04 8.42505 70.981 62.0616
TOTAL -65.052 1120.02 TOTAL -69.829 1897.7 1646.62
Y=Σy/12 -5.421 X=Σx/12 -5.8191

10000 300

9000
250
8000

7000
200
6000
index
5000 150
Navs
4000
100
3000

2000
50
1000

0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance vision fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

1) STANDARD DEVIATION

S.D= √ (y-Y)
N

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 55


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Year (y-Y)2 (y-Y)2/N S.D


2004 563.5243 46.9603 6.8527

2005 368.4037 30.7003 5.5407

2006 504.4993 42.0416 6.4839

2007 420.423 35.0352 5.9190

2008 1120.02 93.335 9.6610

2) BETA

β = N *ΣXY-(ΣX)(ΣY)

NΣX²-(ΣX)²

BETA
YEAR N* Σ XY (ΣX) ( ΣY) NΣx² (ΣX)² β
2005 6005.88 35.14223 45.42131 6656.52 1234.97 0.8133

2006 6729.50 36.99639 40.92972 6331.15 1257.74 1.0279

2007 7596.75 50.15499 47.75224 8474.35 2515.52 0.872

2008 19759.41 -69.8287 -65.0517 22772.06 4876.04 0.850

3) ALPHA

α =Y-β(X)

ALPHA
YEAR Y β X α =Y-β(X)

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 56


Analysis of Risk and Return.

2005 3.785109 0.8133 2.928519 1.4033

2006 3.41081 1.0279 3.083033 0.2417

2007 3.979353 0.872 4.179583 0.3337

2008 -5.42098 0.850 -5.81906 -0.4747

4)SHARPE RATIO

SR=Rp-Rf/SD

Where;

Rp= (Closing Nav/opening Nav-1)

S
HARPE
RATIO
YEAR Rp Rf SD SR
2004 28.87423 5 6.8527 3.483916

2005 51.51552 5.1 5.5407 8.377194

2006 36.67957 5.7 6.4839 4.777922

2007 56.21809 7 5.9190 8.315271

2008 -43.8747 7.5 9.6610 -5.31774

5)TREYNOR RATIO

TR=Rp-Rf/β

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 57


Analysis of Risk and Return.

TREY
NOR RATIO
YEAR Rp Rf β TR
2004 28.87423 5 1.048 22.78075

2005 51.51552 5.1 0.8133 57.0706

2006 36.67957 5.7 1.0279 30.1387

2007 56.21809 7 0.872 56.44276

2008 -43.8747 7.5 0.850 -60.4408

INTERPRETATION

In the year 2004 standard deviation was high at the rate of 9.6610 and in the year 2006
standard deviation was low at the rate of 5.5407. in the year 2006 β is 1.0279 which is
high risk because β greater than 1 in the year 2005 β value is 0.8133 it is less risky
because it is less than 1 . In the year 2005 sharpe index was higher at the rate of 8.377194
and in the year 2008 sharpe index was lesser at the rate of – 5.31774 and . in the year
2005 treynor index was higher at the rate of 57.0706 and treynor index was lesser at the
rate of -60.4408.

3)RELIANCE EQUITY FUND:

Benchmark- S&P CNX NIFTY


RETURN OF PORTFOLIO MARKET RETURN
DATE NAV Rp(y) (y-Y) (y-Y)2 INDEX Rm(x) (x*x) x*y
Jan 07 11.77 4899.39
Feb 07 10.94 -7.05183 -11.005 121.1029 4504.73 -8.0553 64.8877 56.8045
Mar 07 11.04 0.91408 -3.0388 9.234154 4605.89 2.24564 5.0429 2.05269

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 58


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Apr 07 11.67 5.70652 1.75367 3.075358 4934.46 7.13369 50.8896 40.7086


May 07 12.35 5.82691 1.87405 3.512081 5185.95 5.09661 25.9754 29.6974
Jun 07 12.75 3.23887 -0.714 0.509775 5223.82 0.73024 0.53325 2.36516
Jul 07 13.33 4.54902 0.59617 0.355416 5483.25 4.96629 24.664 22.5917
Aug 07 13.12 -1.57539 -5.5282 30.5615 5411.29 -1.3124 1.72229 2.06748
Sep 07 14.47 10.2896 6.33678 40.15481 6094.11 12.6184 159.225 129.839
Oct 07 16.35 12.9924 9.03955 81.7134 7163.3 17.5446 307.815 227.947
Nov 07 16.56 1.2844 -2.6684 7.120615 6997.6 -2.3132 5.3508 -2.97106
Dec 07 17.77 7.30676 3.35391 11.24872 7461.48 6.62913 43.9454 48.4375
TOTAL 43.4814 308.5888 TOTAL 45.2838 690.051 559.54
Y=Σy/12 3.95285 X=Σx/12 4.11671

8000 20

7000 18
16
6000
14
5000
12
index
4000 10
Navs
3000 8

6
2000
4
1000 2
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance equity fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

Dec 07 17.77 7461.48


Jan 08 15.47 -12.9432 -8.4373 71.1878 6245.45 -16.297 265.606 210.94
Feb 08 14.63 -5.42986 -0.924 0.85376 6356.92 1.78482 3.18558 -9.69133
Mar 08 13.28 -9.22761 -4.7217 22.2948 5762.88 -9.3448 87.3249 86.23
Apr 08 14.16 6.62651 11.1324 123.93 6289.07 9.13068 83.3693 60.5045
May 08 13.47 -4.87288 -0.367 0.13469 5937.81 -5.5852 31.195 27.2162
Jun 08 11.7 -13.1403 -8.6344 74.5535 4929.98 -16.973 288.086 223.032
Jul 08 12.32 5.33932 9.84519 96.9278 5297.47 7.45419 55.5649 39.8003

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 59


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Aug 08 12.63 2.45118 6.95705 48.4006 5337.28 0.75149 0.56474 1.84204


Sep 08 11.74 -7.05167 -2.5458 6.48106 4807.2 -9.9317 98.6377 70.0347
Oct 08 9.567 -18.4852 -13.979 195.422 3539.57 -26.369 695.345 487.444
Nov 08 9.231 -3.51629 0.98959 0.97928 3379.53 -4.5215 20.4435 15.8987
Dec 08 9.801 6.17951 10.6854 114.178 3635.87 7.58508 57.5334 46.8721
TOTAL -54.0705 755.343 TOTAL -62.317 1686.86 1260.12
Y=Σy/12 -4.50588 X=Σx/12 -5.1931 140.571

7000 18

16
6000
14
5000
12

4000 10 index

8 Navs
3000

6
2000
4
1000
2

0 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08

Analysis:
The above graph shows the movement of NAV of reliance equity fund and
Benchmark index for the period from Jan 2004 to Dec 2004. From the above graph we
can see there is some correlation between the movement of both

1)STANDARD DEVIATION:

S.D= √ (y-Y)
N

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 60


Analysis of Risk and Return.

YEAR (y-Y)² y-Y)²/N Square root (S.D)


2007 308.5888 25.7157 5.0710

2008 755.3429 62.9445 7.93380

2)BETA

β = N *ΣXY-(ΣX)(ΣY)

NΣX²-(ΣX)²

BETA
YEAR N* Σ XY (ΣX) ( ΣY) NΣx² (ΣX)² β
2007 6714.48 45.28385 43.48137 8280.6 2050.62 0.7617

2008 15121.48 -62.3168 -54.0705 20242.28 3883.38 0.7183

3) ALPHA

α =Y-β(X)

YEAR Y β X α =Y-β(X)
2007 3.952852 0.7617 4.116714 0.81715

2008 -4.50588 0.7183 -5.19307 -0.77569

4)SHARPE RATIO

SR=Rp-Rf/SD

Where;

Rp= (Closing Nav/opening Nav-1)*100

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 61


Analysis of Risk and Return.

SHARPE
RATIO
YEAR Rp Rf SD SR
2007 50.97706 7 5.0710 8.672265

2008 -36.6458 7.5 7.93380 -5.56427

5)TREYNOR RATIO

TR=Rp-Rf/β
TREY
NOR RATIO
YEAR Rp Rf β TR
2007 50.97706 7 0.7617 57.7354

2008 -36.6458 7.5 0.7183 -61.4587

INTERPRETATION

In the year 2008 standard deviation was high at the rate of


7.93380 and in the year 2007 standard deviation was low at the rate of 5.0710. in the year
2007 β is 0.7617 which is high risk because β greater than 1 in the year 2008 β value is
0.7183 it is less risky compared to year 2007 . In the year 2007 sharpe index was higher
at the rate of 8.672265 and in the year 2008 sharpe index was lesser at the rate of –
5.56427. In the year 2007 treynor index was higher at the rate of 57.7354 and treynor
index was lesser at the rate of -61.4587
4)RELIANCE INCOME FUND
RETURN OF PORTFOLIO
DATE NAV Rp(y) (y-Y) (y-Y)2
Jan 04 20.2532
Feb 04 20.247 -0.03061 -0.25196 0.063484
Mar 04 20.5642 1.566652 1.345304 1.809844
Apr 04 20.7212 0.763463 0.542115 0.293889
May 04 20.5788 -0.68722 -0.90857 0.825493
Jun 04 20.3027 -1.34167 -1.56302 2.44303
Jul 04 20.2417 -0.30045 -0.5218 0.272275
Aug 04 20.3598 0.583449 0.362102 0.131118
Sep 04 20.4848 0.613955 0.392608 0.154141
Oct 04 20.4253 -0.29046 -0.51181 0.261946
Nov
PGDMS 04 &20.5051
RC, SIT..0.390692 0.169344 0.028678 62
Dec 04 20.7444 1.167027 0.945679 0.894309
TOTAL 2.434822 7.178206
Y=Σy/12 0.221347
Analysis of Risk and Return.

Dec 04 20.7444
Jan 05 12.2833 -40.7874 -43.6211 1902.8
Feb 05 12.3696 0.70258 -2.13112 4.541686
Mar 05 12.4257 0.453531 -2.38017 5.665219
Apr 05 21.1542 70.24554 67.41184 4544.356
May 05 21.327 0.816859 -2.01684 4.06766
Jun 05 21.4811 0.722558 -2.11114 4.456933
Jul 05 21.576 0.441784 -2.39192 5.721279
Aug 05 21.6339 0.268354 -2.56535 6.581018
Sep 05 21.7031 0.319868 -2.51383 6.319366
Oct 05 21.7566 0.246509 -2.58719 6.693576
Nov 05 21.838 0.374139 -2.45956 6.049454
Dec 05 21.8817 0.20011 -2.63359 6.935814
TATOL 34.00444 6504.188
Y=Σy/12 2.833703

Dec 05 21.8817
Jan 06 21.9243 0.194683 -0.28891 0.083467
Feb 06 21.9714 0.21483 -0.26876 0.072232
Mar 06 22.0254 0.245774 -0.23782 0.056556
Apr 06 22.1279 0.465372 -0.01822 0.000332
May 06 22.2222 0.426159 -0.05743 0.003298
Jun 06 22.2053 -0.07605 -0.55964 0.313197
Jul 06 22.321 0.521047 0.037457 0.001403
Aug 06 22.5169 0.877649 0.394059 0.155283
Sep 06 22.7517 1.042772 0.559183 0.312685
Oct 06 22.9167 0.725221 0.241631 0.058385
Nov 06 23.1332 0.944726 0.461136 0.212647
Dec 06 23.1843 0.220895 -0.2627 0.069009
TOTAL 5.803077 1.338493
Y=Σy/12 0.48359

Dec 06 23.1843
Jan 07 23.2206 0.156571 -0.58936 0.34735
Feb 07 23.1169 -0.44659 -1.19252 1.422109

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 63


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Mar 07 23.1637 0.202449 -0.54349 0.295378


Apr 07 23.2511 0.377315 -0.36862 0.135882
May 07 23.3929 0.609864 -0.13607 0.018516
Jun 07 23.5116 0.507419 -0.23852 0.05689
Jul 07 24.1302 2.631042 1.885106 3.553624
Aug 07 24.0049 -0.51927 -1.2652 1.600736
Sep 07 24.2121 0.863157 0.117221 0.013741
Oct 07 24.7023 2.024608 1.278672 1.635002
Nov 07 24.8961 0.784542 0.0386 0.00149
Dec 07 25.3343 1.760115 1.014179 1.02856
TOTAL 8.951229 10.10928
Y=Σy/12 0.745936

Dec 07 25.3343
Jan 08 25.9301 2.351752 0.592287 0.350804
Feb 08 25.8515 -0.30312 -2.06259 4.254267
Mar 08 25.5116 -1.31482 -3.07428 9.451211
Apr 08 25.5555 0.172079 -1.58739 2.519795
May 08 25.596 0.158479 -1.60099 2.563157
Jun 08 23.5116 -8.14346 -9.90292 98.06792
Jul 08 25.3348 7.75447 5.995005 35.94009
Aug 08 25.6685 1.317161 -0.4423 0.195633
Sep 08 25.7618 0.363481 -1.39598 1.948772
Oct 08 26.1378 1.459525 -0.29994 0.089964
Nov 08 26.9895 3.258499 1.499034 2.247104
Dec 08 30.7787 14.03953 12.28007 150.8001
TOTAL 21.11358 308.4288
Y=Σy/12 1.759465

STANDARD DEVIATION

S.D= √ (y-Y)
N

STANDA
RD DEVIATION
YEAR (y-Y)2 y-Y)2/N Square root (S.D)
2004 7.178206 0.59818 0.77342

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 64


Analysis of Risk and Return.

2005 6504.188 542.015 23.2812

2006 1.338493 0.1115 0.3339

2007 10.10928 0.8419 0.9175

2008 308.4288 25.7024 5.0697

INTERPRETATION

In the year 2005 standard deviation was high at the rate of 23.2812 and in the year 2006
standard deviation was low at the rate of 0.3339

5)RELIANCE LIQUID FUND

RETURN OF PORTFOLIO
DATE NAV Rp(y) (y-Y) (y-Y)2
Jan 04 11.1677
Feb 04 11.202 0.307136 -0.02615 0.000684
Jun 04 11.3348 0.303526 -0.02976 0.000886
Jul 04 11.3711 0.320253 -0.01303 0.00017
Aug 04 11.4086 0.329783 -0.0035 1.23E-05
Sep 04 11.4462 0.329576 -0.00371 1.38E-05
Oct 04 11.4878 0.363439 0.030155 0.000909
Nov 04 11.537 0.42828 0.094996 0.009024
Dec 04 11.584 0.407385 0.074101 0.005491
TOTAL 3.666125 0.022968
Y=Σy/12 0.333284

Dec 04 11.584
Jan 05 11.6257 0.359979 -0.01823 0.000332
Feb 05 11.6643 0.332023 -0.04618 0.002133
Mar 05 11.7086 0.379791 0.001584 2.51E-06

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 65


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Apr 05 11.7494 0.348462 -0.02975 0.000885


May 05 11.7964 0.40002 0.021813 0.000476
Jun 05 11.8397 0.367061 -0.01115 0.000124
Jul 05 11.8838 0.372476 -0.00573 3.29E-05
Aug 05 11.924 0.338276 -0.03993 0.001595
Sep 05 11.9632 0.328749 -0.04946 0.002446
Oct 05 12.0086 0.379497 0.001289 1.66E-06
Nov 05 12.0639 0.460503 0.082296 0.006773
Dec 05 12.1208 0.471655 0.093447 0.008732
TOTAL 4.538493 0.023533
Y=Σy/12 0.378208

Dec 05 12.1208
Jan 06 12.1862 0.539568 10.12145 102.4438
Feb 06 12.243 0.466101 10.04798 100.962
Mar 06 12.3054 0.509679 10.09156 101.8396
Apr 06 12.3561 0.412014 9.993898 99.87799
May 06 12.4067 0.409514 9.991398 99.82803
Jun 06 12.459 0.421546 10.00343 100.0686
Jul 06 12.5136 0.438237 10.02012 100.4028
Aug 06 12.5759 0.497858 10.07974 101.6012
Sep 06 12.6371 0.486645 10.06853 101.3753
Oct 06 0 -100
Nov 06 0 #DIV/0!
Dec 06 -- #VALUE!
TOTAL -95.8188 908.3993
Y=Σy/12 -9.58188

Dec 06 0
Jan 07 12.9355 #DIV/0!
Feb 07 13.0013 0.508678 0.045501 0.00207
Mar 07 13.0952 0.722235 0.259059 0.067112

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 66


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Apr 07 13.2044 0.833893 0.370717 0.137431


May 07 13.2676 0.478628 0.015452 0.000239
Jun 07 13.2842 0.125117 -0.33806 0.114284
Jul 07 13.2926 0.063233 -0.39994 0.159955
Aug 07 13.3493 0.426553 -0.03662 0.001341
Sep 07 13.4105 0.458451 -0.00473 2.23E-05
Oct 07 13.4662 0.415346 -0.04783 0.002288
Nov 07 13.5369 0.525018 0.061842 0.003824
Dec 07 13.6097 0.537789 0.074613 0.005567
TOTAL 5.094942 0.494134
Y=Σy/12 Y 0.463177

Dec 07 13.6097
Jan 08 13.6668 0.419554 -0.13968 0.01951
Feb 08 13.7314 0.472678 -0.08656 0.007492
Mar 08 13.8034 0.524346 -0.03489 0.001217
Apr 08 13.8604 0.412942 -0.14629 0.021401
May 08 13.9262 0.474734 -0.0845 0.00714
Jun 08 14.0024 0.54717 -0.01206 0.000146
Jul 08 14.0846 0.587042 0.027809 0.000773
Aug 08 14.176 0.648936 0.089702 0.008047
Sep 08 14.2857 0.773843 0.21461 0.046057
Oct 08 14.4055 0.838601 0.279367 0.078046
Nov 08 14.4827 0.535906 -0.02333 0.000544
Dec 08 14.5515 0.47505 -0.08418 0.007087
TOTAL 6.710801 0.197461
Y=Σy/12 0.559233

STANDARD DEVIATION

S.D= √ (y-Y)
N

STANDA
RAD
DEVIATION
YEAR (y-Y)2 y-Y)2/N Square root (S.D)

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 67


Analysis of Risk and Return.

2004 0.022968 1.914 1.1761

2005 0.023533 1.961 1.4003

2006 908.3993 75.69 8.7005

2007 0.494134 0.0411 0.2029

2008 0.541306 0.0451 0.212

INTERPRETATION

In the year 2006 standard deviation was high at the rate of 8.7005 and in the year 2008
standard deviation was low at the rate of 0.212

6)RELIANCE GILT SECURITIES FUND

RETURN OF PORTFOLIO
DATE NAV Rp(y) (y-Y) (y-Y)2
Jan 04
Feb 04 -- #VALUE! #VALUE!
Mar 04 10.9298 #VALUE!
Apr 04 -- #VALUE!
May 04 -- #VALUE!
Jun 04 -- #VALUE!
Jul 04 10.6578 #VALUE!
Aug 04 10.81 1.428062 0.365919 0.133897
Sep 04 10.9379 1.183164 0.12102 0.014646
Oct 04 10.9925 0.499182 -0.56296 0.316926
Nov 04 11.0035 0.100068 -0.96208 0.925588
Dec 04 11.2346 2.100241 1.038098 1.077646
TOTAL 5.310717 2.468703
Y=Σy/12 1.062143

Dec 04 11.2346
Jan 05 11.2682 0.299076 -0.26145 0.068357
Feb 05 11.3737 0.936263 0.375735 0.141177
Mar 05 11.4206 0.412355 -0.14817 0.021955
Apr 05 11.4524 0.278444 -0.28208 0.079571
May 05 11.5772 1.089728 0.5292 0.280052

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 68


Analysis of Risk and Return.

Jun 05 11.6694 0.796393 0.235865 0.055632


Jul 05 11.7971 1.094315 0.533787 0.284928
Aug 05 11.8247 0.233956 -0.32657 0.10665
Sep 05 11.8582 0.283305 -0.27722 0.076853
Oct 05 11.8923 0.287565 -0.27296 0.074509
Nov 05 11.9611 0.578526 0.017997 0.000324
Dec 05 12.0133 0.436415 -0.12411 0.015404
TOTAL 6.72634 1.205413
Y=Σy/12 0.560528

Dec 05 12.0133
Jan 06 11.9936 -0.16398 -0.66541 0.442777
Feb 06 11.9964 0.023346 -0.47808 0.228564
Mar 06 12.0146 0.151712 -0.34972 0.122302
Apr 06 12.0851 0.586786 0.085356 0.007286
May 06 12.096 0.090194 -0.41124 0.169115
Jun 06 11.9516 -1.19378 -1.69521 2.873747
Jul 06 12.0094 0.483617 -0.01781 0.000317
Aug 06 12.2235 1.78277 1.28134 1.641833
Sep 06 12.4444 1.807175 1.305745 1.70497
Oct 06 12.5512 0.858217 0.356788 0.127297
Nov 06 12.7511 1.592676 1.091247 1.190819
Dec 06 12.7509 -0.00157 -0.503 0.253007
TOTAL 6.017157 8.762035
Y=Σy/12 0.50143

Dec 06 12.7509
Jan 07 12.7163 -0.27135 -0.90589 0.820642
Feb 07 12.7042 -0.09515 -0.72969 0.532452
Mar 07 12.7487 0.350278 -0.28426 0.080805
Apr 07 12.7655 0.131778 -0.50276 0.252769

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 69


Analysis of Risk and Return.

May 07 12.8997 1.051271 0.416732 0.173665


Jun 07 12.9131 0.103878 -0.53066 0.281601
Jul 07 13.1887 2.134267 1.499727 2.249182
Aug 07 13.2008 0.091745 -0.54279 0.294626
Sep 07 13.2516 0.384825 -0.24971 0.062357
Oct 07 13.4267 1.32135 0.68681 0.471709
Nov 07 13.4644 0.280784 -0.35376 0.125143
Dec 07 13.7513 2.130804 1.496265 2.238808
TOTAL 7.614474 7.583758
Y=Σy/12 0.634539

Dec 07 13.7513
Jan 08 14.2153 3.374226 3.341792 11.16758
Feb 08 14.1822 -0.23285 -0.26528 0.070374
Mar 08 13.8361 -2.44038 -2.47282 6.114824
Apr 08 13.9587 0.886088 0.853654 0.728725
May 08 13.9688 0.072356 0.039922 0.001594
Jun 08 13.8601 -0.77816 -0.8106 0.657067
Jul 08 13.7919 -0.49206 -0.52449 0.275094
Aug 08
Sep 08
Oct 08
Nov 08
Dec 08
TOTAL 0.389217 19.01525
Y=Σy/12 0.032434

STANDARD DEVIATION:

S.D= √ (y-Y)
N

STA
NDARAD
DEVIATION
YEAR (y-Y)2 y-Y)2/N Square root (S.D)

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 70


Analysis of Risk and Return.

2004 2.468703 0.2057 0.4535

2005 1.205413 0.1004 0.3169

2006 8.762035 0.7301 0.8544

2007 7.583758 0.6319 0.7949

2008 19.01525 1.5846 1.2588

INTERPRETATION

In the year 2008 standard deviation was high at the rate of 1.2588and in the year 2005
standard deviation was low at the rate of 0.3169

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 71


Analysis of Risk and Return.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION

1)Standard Deviation:

• When we see Reliance growth fund it has high standard deviation in the year
2004 as compared to other 4 years i.e 2005,2006,2007 &2008
• When we see Reliance vision it has high standard deviation in the year 2008 as
compared to other four years .
• In case of Reliance Income Fund has high standard deviation in 2006
• When we see Reliance equity fund it has high standard deviation in the year 2008
as compared to another one year i.e 2007
• When we see Reliance liquid fund has high standard deviation in 2006 compared
other years
• When we see Reliance gilt securities fund has high standard deviation in 2008
compared to last year

• Here standard deviation is referred to volatility of Nav of the scheme hence the
one with high standard deviation means it has high volatility hence the standard
deviation is directly related to the returns hence higher the standard deviation
higher the returns

2Beta:
• βBeta is referred to how much the portfolio is dependent on the market return so
higher the β higher the dependent hence high risk i.e systematic risk

• When we see Reliance growth fund in 2007 it has high β i.e if 10% decrease in Rm
result in 10%cRp which very dangerous to invest ors but at the when observe in
2008 i.e o.5357 which mean 10%decrease in Rm results in 5.3 Rp which is healty
sigh i.e the 2005 the scheme has lowest systematic risk .

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 72


Analysis of Risk and Return.

• In 2004 1.048 which has higher β value which means the schemes has involved
highest risk
• But it is scheme is all the 5 years the βvalue is less than or which
means decrease in Rm is greater tham decrease in Rp
So it has less systematic risk compared to reliance growth fnd
• When we observe Reliance equity fund the β valu 0.7677 which is highest in the
2007.
• Where as in the other one year 2008 is 0.7183

3 Alpha

By observing the all the 3 schemes we can see that all schemes over the all
3 year s have negative are on . The reason behind alpha in the 3 in due to
change in investment pattern of the as in 2006

4) Sharpe ratio :

Since sharpe ratio is one of the most popular method of knowing the risk
associated with the particulars scheme the higher the ratio better is the performance

• In case of Reliance growth fund the sharpe ratio is high in the year 2005 i.e
4.182091 compared to other four year 2004 i.e -0.38431,2006 i.e 0.553716 2007
i.e 3.532276 & 2008 i.e -6.51645. so we can say that scheme has performed very
well in the year 2005 or compared to other four yea

• In case of Reliance vision fund the sharpe ration is high in the year 2005
8.377194 compared to other 4 years 2004i.e 3.483916 ,2006 i.e 4.777922 i.e

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 73


Analysis of Risk and Return.

2007 i.e 8.315271 & 2008 i.e -5.31774 . so we can say that the scheme has
performed very well in the year 2005 as compared to other four year

• In case of Reliance equity fund the sharpe ratio is high in the year 2007 i.e
8.672265 compared to other one year 2008 i.e -61.4587 this very good sigh as
compared to all other scheme ,this scheme has recorded higher sharpe ratio with
the value of 8.672265 in 2007.

5) Treynor’s Ratio:

Now coming to another ratio which is derived as treynor’s ratio which is different from
sharp ratio since this ratio observe & consider only systematic risk. which is
uncontrollable but where as sharp ratio considers both controllable & uncontrollable risk
i.e systematic as well as unsystematic.
• In case of Reliance vision fund the treynor’s ratio is high in the year 2005 i.e
4.5912 compared to other four years 2004 i.e -0.2458 , 2006 i.e 3.7252,2007 i.e 4.4819
and 2008 i.e -6.4567.so we can say the scheme performed very well in year 2005
compared to other four years but in 2004 it has lower performance.
• In case of Reliance growth fund the ratio is high in the year 2005 i.e 3.25708
compared to other four years 2004.e 1.16950,2006 i.e 1.79626, 2007 i.e3.12612
and 2008 i.e – 12.9086.so we say the scheme performed very well in year 2005
compared to other four years but in 2008 it has lower performance.
• In case of Reliance equity fund the ratio is high in the year 2007 i.e 5.09761
compared to last year 2008 i.e -6.37737. so we can say the scheme performed
very well in year 2007 compared to last year.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 74


Analysis of Risk and Return.

. SUGGESTIONS

1) The Mutual Fund companies should utilize this opportunity of soft interest regime
followed by the banks and attract the fixed deposit and the savings Bank Account
Investors.

2) The Mutual Fund Asset Management companies should Educate and give
Awareness about the concept of Mutual Funds to the investors. As majority of the
investors do not know what a Mutual Fund is. And it should highlight the benefits
of mutual fund over other investment and attract more number of custo

3) The Mutual Fund Asset Management companies come up with more


advertisements and promotional measures and it should also target the F I I’s and
individual investors who invest in the capital markets.

4) Always the fund should state the objective of each fund floated by the Asset
Management Company to the investors so that the right investors choose the right
fund.

PGDMS & RC, SIT.. 75

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi