Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 45

THE E&P FORUM

EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION (E&P)


WASTE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES
Report No. 2.58/196
September 1993
E& P Forum
Exploration & Production (E& P)
W aste M anagem ent G uidelines
R eport N o. 2.58/196
Septem ber 1993
E& P Forum , 2528 O ld B urlington Street, London W 1X 1LB
Telephone: 44-(0)71-437 6291 Fax: 44-(0)71-434 3721
These guidelines have been prepared for the E & P Forum by their
Environm ental Q uality C om m ittee through their W aste M anagem ent
G uidelines Task Force.
M s C . K. O w ens Exxon, C hairperson
M r D . R . R ycroft Phillips
M r M . T. Stephenson Texaco
M r G . N orris A m erada H ess
M r J. A . Johnson C onoco
M r L. W . C ram e A m oco
M r C . Inglesfield SIPM
M r A . G rieg Shell Expro
The O il Industry International Exploration and Production Forum (E& P
Forum ) is the international association of oil com panies and petroleum
industry organisations form ed in 1974. It w as established to represent its
m em bersinterests at the International M aritim e O rganisation and other
specialist agencies of the U nited N ations, governm ental and other
international bodies concerned w ith regulating the exploration and
production of oil and gas. W hile m aintaining this activity, the Forum now
concerns itself w ith all aspects of E & P operations, w ith particular
em phasis on safety of personnel and protection of the environm ent, and
seeks to establish industry positions w ith regard to such m atters.
A t present the Forum has 48 m em bers m ade up of 33 oil com panies
and 15 national oil industry associations, operating in 52 different countries.
The w ork of the Forum covers:
G m onitoring the activities of relevant global and regional international
organisations;
G developing industry positions on issues;
G advancing the positions on issues under consideration, draw ing on the
collective expertise of its m em bers; and
G dissem inating inform ation on good practice through the developm ent
of industry guidelines, codes of practice, check lists etc.
W hilst every effort has been m ade to ensure the accuracy of the
inform ation contained in this publication, neither E& P Forum nor any of its
m em bers w ill assum e liability for any use m ade thereof.
D esign and layout: W ords and Publications, O xford
A uthors
The E& P Forum
D isclaim er
A cknow ledgm ents
EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION (E&P)
WASTE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION 2
Scope 2
B ackground 2
R esources Included in this D ocum ent 2
PRINCIPLES OF
WASTE MANAGEMENT 4
W aste M anagem ent H ierarchy 4
A rea-Specific W aste M anagem ent Plans 6
AN OVERVIEW OF
THE OIL EXPLORATION
AND PRODUCTION PROCESS 8
Seism ic Identification of Potential H ydrocarbon
R eserves 8
Exploratory D rilling 9
C onstruction 10
D evelopm ent and Production 10
M aintenance 10
D ecom m issioning and R eclam ation 11
WASTE MANAGEMENT METHODS 12
W aste M anagem ent M ethods 12
Source R eduction M ethods 12
R euse 13
R ecycling/R ecovery 13
Treatm ent 13
R esponsible D isposal 13
Surface D ischarge 14
Injection 14
B iotreatm ent M ethods 16
Landfarm ing 16
Landspreading 17
C om posting 18
B iological Treatm ent in Tanks 18
B iological Treatm entPackage U nits 19
Therm al Treatm ent M ethods 19
Incineration 19
C em ent KilnsFuel B lending 20
O pen B urning 20
Therm al D esorption System s 20
Solidification, Stabilisation and Encapsulation 21
Landfill 21
B urial 21
Pit M anagem ent 22
Solvent Extraction 22
APPENDICES
1. R eferences 24
2. G lossary of O il Industry Term s 26
3. W aste M anagem ent Planning W orksheet 30
4. Sum m ary of W astes G enerated by E& P A ctivities 32
5. Specific W aste Inform ation 35
6. W aste M anagem ent O ptionsSum m ary Tables 42
CONTENTS
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
Scope
B ackground
R esources Included in this D ocum ent
IN TR O D U C TIO N
These guidelines have been prepared for those oil and gas exploration and
production (E& P) com panies w ho require inform ation on the range of
w aste m anagem ent options available for w astes generated by their activi-
ties. Sections of the docum ent provide:
G a general description of w aste m anagem ent principles
G an identification and overview of E& P activities and associated
w astes, and
G options for w aste reduction, recycling, treatm ent and responsible
disposal.
O perators should be able to use these guidelines to develop a w aste m an-
agem ent program m e appropriate to their activities and to the ecological
sensitivity of the operating location. H ow ever, not all m easures discussed
in these guidelines w ill necessarily be appropriate for im plem entation in all
geographic areas or under all conditions. E& P Forum guideline docum ents
on operations w ithin rain forest, m angrove and arctic environm ents pro-
vide additional inform ation and considerations for these specific areas.
Specific requirem ents and standards for petroleum operators should be
determ ined by agreem ent betw een the operating com pany and the
authorities of a host country.
Effective and responsible w aste handling and disposal are key elem ents
of an organisations environm ental m anagem ent system . Exploration and
Production (E& P) w aste as defined for this docum ent w ill be any m aterial,
solid, liquid or m ixture that is surplus to requirem ents. There is increasing
international concern that w astes be properly m anaged in order to m in-
im ise their potential to cause harm to health or the environm ent.
M oreover, efficient m anagem ent of w astes can reduce operating costs
and potential liabilities. C haracteristics of concern include flam m ability,
reactivity, corrosivity, longevity in the environm ent and hum an, anim al, or
plant toxicity.
This docum ent is designed as an inform ation source. It is not intended to
replace an operators responsibility to ensure adequate and effective han-
dling and disposal of generated w astes as required w ithin a host countrys
regulatory requirem ents.
D isposal options in som e areas m ay be restricted by lack of established
w aste m anagem ent facilities and infrastructure. In these cases, the oil
and gas operator m ay find it necessary to construct and m anage the nec-
essary facilities. A lthough this approach m ay be expensive in the short
term , it can often m inim ise long-term liabilities.
In addition to the discussions on w aste m anagem ent options included in
this docum ent, a num ber of appendices are provided to clarify or provide
exam ples of som e topics presented in the text. These appendices are as
follow s:
G A ppendix 1 provides a list of references either used during preparation
of this docum ent or providing supplem entary inform ation on various
issues presented.
G A ppendix 2 is a glossary of oil industry term s encountered in this
docum ent.
2
G A ppendix 3 contains a form for creating an inventory of w astes
generated during E& P activities.
G A ppendix 4 provides tabulation of com m on types of w astes generated
during E& P activities, the m ain sources of these w astes, constituents
of these w astes that m ay adversely im pact the environm ent w hen
present, and identification of the operations w hich m ay generate a
specific w aste stream .
G A ppendix 5 includes sum m ary sheets on a variety of com m on E& P
w astes. These sheets discuss the characteristics of the w aste stream s
and som e w aste m anagem ent options that m ay be appropriate.
G A ppendix 6 provides a table of com m on types of w astes generated
during E& P activities and a sum m ary of possible w aste m anagem ent
options.
3
IN TR O D U C TIO N
PR IN C IPLES O F
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T
The principles of w aste m anagem ent include the incorporation of a hierar-
chy of w aste m anagem ent practices in the developm ent of w aste m an-
agem ent plans. Specific w aste m anagem ent practices m ay be tailored to
w aste and site characteristics as w ell as to availability of reuse, recycle,
treatm ent and disposal facilities.
C reating an inventory to identify and track w aste stream s, and record the
costs associated w ith m anagem ent of those stream s, can help provide a
baseline for identification of opportunities to im prove practices. A n accu-
rate inventory of w aste m anagem ent practices recording the types of
w astes, m ethods of treatm ent or disposal, and location of final disposal
w ill not only be a valuable tool for w aste m inim isation program m es, but
also be a source of data in the event of any question of liability for contam -
ination, and site rem ediation. A ppendix 3 contains a sam ple w aste inven-
tory sheet to aid in this process.
Proper m anagem ent of w astes begins w ith pollution prevention. Pollution
prevention refers to the elim ination, change or reduction of operating prac-
tices w hich result in discharges to land, air or w ater. This principle should
be incorporated into the design and m anagem ent of E& P facilities and the
planning of associated activities. If elim ination of a w aste is not possible,
then m inim ising the am ount of w aste generated should be investigated.
R esponsible w aste m anagem ent m ay be accom plished through hierarchi-
cal application of the practices of source reduction, reuse, recycling,
recovery, treatm ent and responsible disposal. Elem ents of these practices
are show n below :
G Source Reductionthe generation of less w aste through m ore
efficient practices such as:
m aterial elim ination
inventory control and m anagem ent
m aterial substitution
process m odification
im proved housekeeping
G Reusethe use of m aterials or products that are reusable in their
original form such as
chem ical containers
oily w astes for road construction and stabilisation
burning w aste oil for energy
G Recycling/Recoverythe conversion of w astes into usable m aterials
and/or extraction of energy or m aterials from w astes.
Exam ples include:
recycling scrap m etal
recycling drilling m uds
using cleaned drill cuttings for road construction m aterial
recovering oil from tank bottom s and produced w ater
G Treatmentthe destruction, detoxification and/or neutralisation of
residues through processes such as:
biological m ethodscom posting, tank based degradation
therm al m ethodsincineration, therm al desorption
chem ical m ethodsneutralisation, stabilisation
physical m ethodsfiltration, centrifugation
4
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
W aste M anagem ent H ierarchy
G Responsible Disposaldepositing w astes on land or in w ater using
m ethods appropriate for a given situation. D isposal m ethods include:
landfilling
burial
surface discharge
landspreading or landfarm ing
underground injection
The flow diagram show n in Figure 1 displays how these w aste m anage-
m ent practices m ay be applied. Specific m ethodologies w hich apply these
principles are presented in the section on W aste M anagem ent M ethods.
The role of tem porary and perm anent storage of w astes in the m anage-
m ent process is not addressed in Figure 1.
The potential ecological sensitivity of the location of operations is key to
the selection of an appropriate m anagem ent practice for a specific w aste.
This m ay require inform ation on geology, hydrology, clim ate and biological
com m unities. Environm ental Im pact A ssessm ent docum ents can be a
useful resource.
5
PR IN C IPLES O F W A STE M A N A G EM EN T
FIGURE 1: Key Waste Handling,
Minimisation and Disposal Decisions
INVENTORY
CHARACTERISE
SEGREGATE
IS THERE A RESIDUE?
DOES IT REQUIRE
TREATMENT(S)?
TREATMENT(S) STOP
DISPOSAL
Minimisation Examples
REDUCE
REUSE
RECYCLE/
RECOVER
G
G
G
G
G
Process modification or design change
Material elimination
Inventory control and management
Material substitution
Improved housekeeping
G
G
G
Chemical containers
Oily wastes for road spreading
Cleaned drill cuttings for roadbed
material or landfill cover
G
G
G
G
G
Recycle scrap metal
Recycle paper
Recycle drilling muds
Burn waste lubricating oil for energy recovery
Recover oil from tank bottoms, produced
water and drilling muds
No
Yes
Yes
No
A n area-specific w aste m anagem ent plan directly relates the choice of
w aste handling and disposal options to the ecological sensitivities, regula-
tory requirem ents and available facilities/infrastructure of the geographical
area involved. The plan should be w ritten from the field perspective and
provide specific guidance for handling each w aste stream . In developing
such a plan, an E& P facility or com pany could follow the 10 general steps
outlined below .
G Step 1: Management Approval
M anagem ent approval and support should be obtained. Key personnel or
other resources and scheduling issues should be resolved such that m an-
agem ent is aw are of the tim ing and scope of the plan. The overall goal(s)
of the w aste m anagem ent plan should be established w ith m easurable
objectives stated for each goal.
G Step 2: Area Definition
The w aste m anagem ent plan is area-specific and should include a descrip-
tion of the geographical area and specific business activities addressed.
The prim ary consideration in selecting an area is hom ogeneity from both
an ecological and a regulatory standpoint.
G Step 3: Waste Identification
O perations personnel should identify all the w astes generated w ithin the
area defined for each E & P activity (i.e., production, drilling,
com pletion/w orkover, natural gas plants). A brief description for each
w aste (sources, percent oil and/or saltw ater content and approxim ate vol-
um e) w ill assist in further m anagem ent steps. A ppendix 3 contains an
inventory form w hich m ay facilitate this effort.
G Step 4: Regulatory Analysis
R eview international, regional and host country law s and regulations to
determ ine the types of w astes for w hich m anagem ent practices should
be highlighted. W aste types for w hich the regulations do not adequately
define m anagem ent requirem ents should then be identified.
G Step 5: Waste Categorisation
The physical, chem ical and toxicological properties of each w aste should
be identified. This inform ation m ay be found via M aterial Safety D ata
Sheets (M SD S), m anufacturers inform ation, process know ledge, historic
inform ation or lab analyses. A system to categorise w aste stream s accord-
ing to their health and environm ental hazards can then be developed.
G Step 6: Evaluation of Waste Management and Disposal Options
A list of the potential w aste m anagem ent option(s) for each w aste should
be com piled using the section on W aste M anagem ent M ethods and
A ppendices 5 and 6 as a guide, and available options should be identified.
The acceptability of each option for the different ecological dom ains in the
plan area can then be determ ined.
Evaluation should include: environm ental considerations; location; engi-
neering lim itations; regulatory restrictions; operating feasibility; eco-
nom ics; potential long-term liability; etc. The list of the acceptable w aste
6
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
A rea-Specific W aste M anagem ent Plans
m anagem ent options and the desirability of each should be review ed by
appropriate operations personnel and m anagem ent.
In the event that intractable w aste stream s (such as those containing poly-
chlorinated biphenyls (PC B s) or radioactivity) are identified, the m anage-
m ent m ethod of perm anent storage in specialised storage facilities m ay
be the only available option for reducing environm ental risk.
G Step 7: Waste Minimisation
O pportunities for reduction or elim ination of w aste, volum e or toxicity
reduction, recycling and reclaim ing, or treatm ent should be review ed
w hen evaluating m anagem ent options. W hen a potential w aste m inim isa-
tion practice is identified, a pilot test m ay be desired for evaluation.
R evision of the w aste m anagem ent plan should be m ade to reflect any
m inim isation practices im plem ented.
G Step 8: Selection of Preferred Waste Management Practice(s)
From the evaluation of w aste m anagem ent and disposal options, selec-
tion of the best practice for that operation and location can be m ade. A
life-cycle analysis assessing the risks associated w ith storage, treatm ent,
transport and disposal of a particular w aste stream m ay provide additional
insight into w hich m anagem ent practices should be given preferred sta-
tus. Through these processes, operations personnel m ay justify several
of the current w aste m anagem ent practices and/or identify new or m odi-
fied practices.
G Step 9: Implementation of an Area Waste Management Plan
C om pile all the preferred w aste m anagem ent and disposal options for
each w aste found in a given operating area into one com prehensive, area-
specific w aste m anagem ent plan.
The recom m ended w aste m anagem ent practices should be sum m arised
in concise docum ents for use at the field level. D escriptions should
include only the w astes generated by the operations in the specific area or
w ithin an operators responsibility. Each w aste description should indicate
the chosen w aste m anagem ent and disposal practice.
G Step 10: Plan Review and Update
Effective w aste m anagem ent is an ongoing process. The plan should be
review ed w henever new w aste m anagem ent practices or options are
identified. A procedure to review and update the w aste m anagem ent plan
should be established, and practices m odified to reflect changing tech-
nologies, needs, or regulations.
A rea w aste m anagem ent planning, im plem entation and review offers
reassurance w ith regard to :
G protection of the environm ent and ongoing com pliance w ith regulatory
requirem ents
G ongoing training of field personnel
G appropriateness of the plan itself, and
G m inim isation of the volum e and toxicity of the w astes
The w aste m anagem ent plan should be a living evergreendocum ent
w hich requires periodic review and revision.
7
PR IN C IPLES O F W A STE M A N A G EM EN T
A N O VERVIEW O F TH E O IL A N D
G A S EXPLO R ATIO N A N D
PR O D U C TIO N PR O C ESS
In order to appreciate the potential im pacts of oil and gas developm ent
upon the environm ent, one m ust understand the activities involved. This
chapter briefly describes the oil and gas exploration and production pro-
cess. The guidance in this docum ent addresses only the w aste m anage-
m ent aspects of these activities. In order to fully understand the range of
environm ental im pacts associated w ith these activities, reference should
be m ade to other guidelines and docum ents listed in A ppendix 1.
In the follow ing discussions, com m on w astes are listed for each activity.
A m ore detailed listing of w astes associated w ith various E& P activities is
provided in A ppendix 4.
In the first stage of the search for hydrocarbon-bearing rock form ations,
geological m aps are review ed to identify m ajor sedim entary basins. A erial
photography m ay be used to identify prom ising landscape form ations such
as faults or anticlines. M ore detailed inform ation is then assem bled using a
field geological assessm ent, follow ed by one or m ore of three m ain survey
m ethods: m agnetic, gravim etric and seism ic. O f these a seism ic survey is
the m ost com m on and is often the first field activity undertaken.
Description
Seism ic surveys require the generation of acoustic w aves at specified
points along a relatively straight survey line. The acoustic w aves are
reflected by changes in the subsurface geological strata. The reflections
are detected by m any sensors arranged along several kilom etres of the
survey line (over several square kilom etres in the case of a 3D survey) and
recorded. Line preparation m ay involve cutting vegetation prior to survey-
ing the data point and sensor locations. A s recording progresses along the
survey line onshore, the sensors are m oved to new positions along the
survey line by crew s using vehicles or helicopters. The data are processed
by com puter to m ap the underlying strata and help define the size and
shape of any geologic structure w orthy of further investigation.
Several m ethods are available to generate the acoustic w aves; these
include the use of shot holes, Vibroseis techniques, or air or w ater guns.
The shot hole m ethod involves the detonation of sm all explosive charges
placed in sm all diam eter holes drilled to a depth generally ranging from
one to thirty m etres. In the Vibroseis m ethod, a group of three to five
heavy vehicles (vibrators) low er and then vibrate a heavy pad at specific
points on the surface. A ir or w ater guns create the acoustic w aves used
for the survey by releasing com pressed air or w ater to create loud sonic
vibrations.
B ecause land seism ic activities are highly m obile, base cam ps are tem po-
rary in nature. In order to protect surface w ater bodies, sanitary pits and
biodegradable garbage pits should be at least 100 m etres from the w ater,
if possible. N on-biodegradable, flam m able w astes m ay be burned and the
ashes buried w ith the non-flam m able w astes. This burial should be at
least one m etre deep. If the area w ater table is high, burial criteria should
be reconsidered.
8
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
Seism ic Identification of Potential
H ydrocarbon R eserves
C om m on W astes
The prim ary w astes from seism ic operations include dom estic w aste,
sew age, explosive w astes, lines, cables and vehicle (including ship) m ain-
tenance w astes.
O nce a prom ising geological structure has been identified, the only w ay to
confirm the presence of hydrocarbons and the thickness and internal pres-
sure of a reservoir is to drill exploratory boreholes (w ells).
The location of a drill site is dependent upon the characteristics of the
underlying geological form ations. M odern drilling techniques allow som e
flexibility in choice of location, allow ing consideration of both environm en-
tal protection and logistical needs, w hile still reaching reservoir develop-
m ent objectives.
Description
A site is constructed to accom m odate drilling operations and support ser-
vices. O ffshore, a drilling barge, sem i-subm ersible drilling rig or a drilling
ship is used to provide all of the functions associated w ith drilling the w ell.
O n land, a typical one-hole exploration site occupies betw een 5000 and
20,000 square m etres. The type of site construction is dependent on sea-
sonal constraints and geography. D rilling rigs and support equipm ent are
norm ally divided into m odules to facilitate transportation. D epending on
access roads, site location and m odule size and w eight, drilling rigs m ay
be m oved by land, air or w ater transportation.
O nce on site, the rig and a self-contained support cam p are assem bled.
Typical m odules include a derrick, drilling m ud handling equipm ent, pow er
generators and cem enting equipm ent. The cam p provides w orkforce
accom m odation, canteen facilities, com m unications, vehicle m aintenance
and parking areas, a helipad (for rem ote sites), fuel handling and storage
areas, and provision for collection, treatm ent and disposal of w astes.
O nce drilling com m ences, drilling fluid or m ud is continuously circulated
dow n the drill pipe and back to the surface equipm ent to balance under-
ground hydrostatic pressure, cool and lubricate the bit and flush out rock
cuttings. The risk of uncontrolled flow from the reservoir to the surface is
further reduced by using blow out preventers, a series of hydraulically actu-
ated steel ram s that can close around the drill string or casing to quickly
seal off a w ell. Steel casing is run into com pleted sections of the borehole
and cem ented into place. The casing and cem ent provide structural sup-
port to m aintain the integrity of the borehole, isolate underground form a-
tions, and protect usable underground sources of w ater. W here a hydro-
carbon form ation is found, initial w ell tests are conducted to establish flow
rates, form ation pressure, and the physical and chem ical characteristics of
the oil and gas.
C om m on W astes
The prim ary w astes from exploratory drilling operations include drilling
m uds and cuttings; cem enting w astes; w ell com pletion, w orkover and
stim ulation fluids; and production testing w astes. O ther w astes include
excess drilling chem icals and containers, construction m aterials (pallets,
w ood, etc.), process w ater, fuel storage containers, pow er unit and trans-
port m aintenance w astes, scrap m etal and dom estic and sew age w astes.
9
A N O VER VIEW O F TH E O IL A N D G A S EXPLO R A TIO N A N D PR O D U C TIO N PR O C ESS
Exploratory D rilling
C onstruction of som e infrastructure and facilities w ill be required to sup-
port activities.
Description
C onstruction of facilities such as roads, cam ps, canals and pipelines m ay
be required both before and during the developm ent and production pro-
cess. The construction process m ay use a w ide variety of m aterials,
equipm ent and m ethods. The facilities required for a specific activity w ill
depend on the activity and its geographic location.
C om m on W astes
The prim ary w astes from construction activities include excess construc-
tion m aterials, used lubricating oils, paints, solvents, sew age and dom es-
tic w astes.
D evelopm ent and production operations are conducted to extract the oil
and gas from the reservoir.
Description
A sm all reservoir m ay be developed using one or m ore of the exploratory
w ells. Further developm ent of the reservoir m ay require additional w ells.
A production facility m ay be required to separate, store and transport pro-
duced fluids. The size and type of the installations needed for storing, sep-
arating and transporting oil, gas and w ater w ill depend on the nature and
location of the reservoir, the volum e and nature of produced fluids and the
export option selected. These options include transport by road, w ater-
w ay, pipeline or som e com bination of these.
R outine operations on a producing w ell include m onitoring, safety and
security inspections and periodic dow nhole servicing using a w ire line unit
or a w orkover rig. In som e areas, a self-contained base cam p m ay be
established to support routine operations. The base cam p provides w ork-
force accom m odation, com m unications, vehicle m aintenance and parking,
fuel handling and storage, and provision for collection, treatm ent and dis-
posal of w astes.
The operator w ill be able to extract only a portion of the oil present using
natural pressure and sim ple pum ping. A range of enhanced recovery
m ethods, including w aterflood, gas injection and m ethods em ploying
chem icals, gases or heat m ay be used to increase the efficiency of oil pro-
duction.
C om m on W astes
In addition to the w astes listed under Exploratory D rilling, C onstruction
and M aintenance, the m ain w astes from developm ent and production
operations include discharged produced w ater, flare and vent gas, produc-
tion chem icals, w orkover w astes (e.g. brines) and tank or pit bottom s.
M aintenance of vehicles, m echanical equipm ent and infrastructure m ay
be required for operations of extended duration.
Description
M aintenance activities are com m on to all phases of the exploration and
production process. D uring seism ic and construction activities, m ainte-
nance is essentially lim ited to vehicle repair and inspection. Exploratory
drilling m aintenance activities include vehicle and drilling rig repair and
10
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
C onstruction
D evelopm ent and Production
M aintenance
inspection. M aintenance activities during developm ent and production
include repair and inspection of vehicles, generators, drilling rigs, w orkover
rigs, fluid process equipm ent and infrastructure.
C om m on W astes
The prim ary w astes associated w ith m aintenance activities include batter-
ies, used lubricants, filters, hoses, tyres, paints, solvents, contam inated
soil, coolant and antifreeze chem icals, used parts and scrap m etals.
O il and gas installations are decom m issioned at the end of their com m er-
cial life.
Description
D ecom m issioning generally involves perm anently plugging and abandon-
ing all w ells, and m ay include rem oval of buildings and equipm ent, transfer
of buildings and roads to local com m unities or host governm ent entities,
im plem entation of m easures to encourage site re-vegetation and site
m onitoring.
C om m on W astes
The prim ary w astes from decom m issioning and reclam ation include con-
struction m aterials, insulating m aterials, plant equipm ent, sludges and con-
tam inated soil.
11
D ecom m issioning and R eclam ation
A N O VER VIEW O F TH E O IL A N D G A S EXPLO R A TIO N A N D PR O D U C TIO N PR O C ESS
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S
A s in any aspect of environm ental m anagem ent, there are som e general 4
good practices that should be em ployed. These good practices not only
protect health and the environm ent but also help protect E& P operators
from potential long-term liabilities associated w ith w aste disposal. W aste
m anagem ent m ethods should be selected based upon the hierarchy pre-
sented on page 4.
Som e of the treatm ent and disposal m ethods that m ay be used for E& P
w astes are described on page 14 onw ards. The om ission of a particular
m anagem ent option from the list discussed here is not m eant to im ply
that it can not be effective. C ertainly, as research on w aste m anagem ent
progresses, additional options w ill be identified.
A n im portant aspect of a w aste m anagem ent program m e is the need to
segregate w aste m aterials according to their general physical and chem i-
cal characteristics. A part from safety concerns, an initial w aste characteri-
sation w ill help determ ine w hich w aste stream s are sim ilar and m ay be
com bined to sim plify storage, treatm ent, recycling, and/or disposal, and
w hich stream s should rem ain segregated. Failure to recognise the need
for w aste segregation m ay result in the creation of a w aste m ixture
incom patible w ith the desired recycling or disposal option and result in the
need for extensive lab analysis and higher w aste disposal costs.
Source Reduction Methods
Source reduction m eans elim inating or decreasing, to the extent practical,
the volum e or relative toxicity of w astes generated by using alternate
m aterials, processes or procedures.
Volum eO pportunities to achieve significant w aste volum e reductions for
som e E& P w astes are lim ited because their volum es are prim arily a func-
tion of activity level and age or state of reservoir depletion. For exam ple,
the proportion of discharged produced w ater typically increases as the
reservoir is depleted. A lso, the volum e of drilling m uds generated is gen-
erally a function of the num ber of w ells drilled and their depth.
N evertheless, opportunities exist for source reduction and efforts should
be m ade to exploit them . For exam ple, use of proper solids control equip-
m ent can reduce the volum e of m ud discharged.
Process m odification m ay be possible through m ore effective use of
m echanical com ponents, such as m ore effective drill bits, rather than
chem ical additions. G ravel packs and screens m ay significantly reduce the
volum e of form ation solids/sludge produced. Im proved controls w ill help
m inim ise m ud changes, engine oil changes and solvent usage.
ToxicitySubstitution of products that result in the generation of less
toxic w astes should be investigated. For exam ple, biocides, corrosion
inhibitors, coagulants, cleaners, solvents, dispersants, em ulsion breakers,
scale inhibitors, viscosifiers and w eighting agents should be selected w ith
potential environm ental im pacts and disposal needs in m ind. Som e exam -
ples are the selection of m ud and additives that do not contain significant
levels of biologically available heavy m etals or toxic com pounds, and the
use of m ineral oils in place of diesel oil for stuck drill pipe.
O ther efforts should include: efficient planning so that all com m ercial
chem ical products are used on the site or returned unused to vendors;
12
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
W aste M anagem ent M ethods
consideration of bulk chem ical purchases to elim inate drum s; and use of
drains and sum ps to collect and segregate spills.
Reuse
A fter all w aste reduction options have been considered, the next step is to
evaluate reuse of the w aste m aterial. The reuse m ay be in the sam e, alter-
native, or dow ngraded service, or the return of unused m aterials for re-
issue or reuse in other industries. Exam ples include: use of drill cutting
w aste for brick m anufacture and roadbed m aterial, use of vent gas for fuel,
use of produced w ater or process w ater as w ash w ater, and return of oil
based drilling m ud to the vendor for reprocessing and re-issue.
W astes such as tank bottom s, em ulsions, heavy hydrocarbons, and hydro-
carbon bearing soil m ay be used for road oil, road m ix, or asphalt. These
w astes should be analysed to ensure they are not flam m able and have a
m ixed density and m etals content consistent w ith road oils or m ixes.
A pplication of hydrocarbon w astes to roads should be at loading rates that
m inim ise the possibility of surface run-off.
Recycling/Recovery
A fter all w aste reduction and reuse options have been considered, the
next step is to evaluate recycling and recovery of the w aste m aterial either
in-process, on-site, or w ith outside contractors. W hen available, the recy-
cling of drilling m uds in m ud plants should be considered.
There are potential benefits in the sale of recovered hydrocarbons. A ll
hydrocarbon w astes should be returned to the production stream w here
possible. R ecovery of hydrocarbons from tank bottom s and separator
sludges via centrifuging or filtering can be accom plished at on-site produc-
tion facilities or off-site com m ercial facilities.
W hen recycling scrap m etal, m onitoring should be considered to ensure
that m etal w ith N O R M (LSA ) scale is not sent to the recycling facility along
w ith uncontam inated m aterials.
Treatment
A fter source reduction, reuse, recycling and recovery opportunities have
been exam ined, potential treatm ent steps to m inim ise w aste volum es or
toxicity should be considered.
Treatm ent m ethods include: biological m ethods (e.g. landspreading, com -
posting, tank based reactors), therm al m ethods (e.g. therm al desorption
and detoxification), chem ical m ethods (e.g. precipitation, extraction, neu-
tralisation) and physical m ethods (e.g. gravity separation, filtration, centrifu-
gation).
Exam ples of treatm ent m ethods include: biodegradation of oily w astes in
a pit by tillage and addition of nutrients (fertilizer); and stabilisation of m ud
pit w astes by adjusting the pH to chem ically stabilise and reduce potential
toxicity and m obility of inorganic com pounds.
Responsible Disposal
Finally, after all practical source reduction, reuse, recycling, recovery and
treatm ent options have been considered and incorporated, responsible dis-
posal options for the residue should be determ ined. The follow ing criteria
should be exam ined w hen evaluating w aste disposal options. This inform a-
tion w ill help in determ ining the long-term fate of a w aste and its con-
stituents and should be applied to both on-site and off-site disposal facilities.
13
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S
G eneral A rea O verview R eview the relevant law s and regulations of the
area and the availability of off-site disposal facilities.
G eneral Site O verview R eview the area-w ide topographical and geologi-
cal features. A lso, review current and likely future activities around the dis-
posal site.
H ydrological EvaluationR eview hydrogeologic data to identify the loca-
tion, size and direction of flow for existing surface w ater bodies and
aquifers characterised as fresh or usable.
A rea R ainfall or N et Precipitation C onditionsO btain historical rainfall dis-
tribution data to establish m oisture requirem ents for landspreading, deter-
m ine how quickly reserve pits w ill dry, predict net evaporation rates, eval-
uate pit overflow potential, etc.
Soil C onditions and Loading C onsiderationsD eterm ine soil conditions
prior to m aking decisions on loading for landspreading and w hether or not
pits w ill require liners. For exam ple, in high clay content and perm afrost
areas, liners m ay not be necessary for reserve pits. In other areas w ith
sandy soils and shallow usable groundw ater, liners or even tanks m ay be
m ore appropriate.
D rainage A reasD eterm ine natural or existing drainage patterns and iden-
tify drainage devices needed to control w ater flow into, onto, or from facil-
ity system s.
Environm ental SensitivityC onduct a site evaluation to identify environ-
m entally-sensitive features such as w etlands, urban areas, historical or
archaeological sites, protected habitats, or presence of endangered species.
A ir Q ualityG ive consideration to potential air quality im pact of w aste
m anagem ent facilities.
Surface discharge is one disposal option for aqueous w aste stream s.
Factors to consider include the sensitivity and capacity of the potential
receiving environm ent, the concentration of potentially harm ful com po-
nents in the w aste and the volum e of the discharge stream . The capacity
of the receiving environm ent to naturally absorb pollutants is a function of
the dilution potential and volum e of the receiving w ater body. In this
regard, the discharge of a high volum e, saline w aste stream into a sm all
creek m ay not be appropriate w hile discharge of the sam e w aste stream
into a large w ater body m ay be acceptable.
Injection refers to the pum ping of w aste fluids or slurries dow n a w ell into
suitable underground form ations for disposal. Injection m ay refer to the
one tim e pum ping of w astes dow n an annulus or to specially m onitored
w ells w hich m ay receive fluids for m any years. D isposal w ells are
designed to provide an avenue, or w ellbore, to transport liquids into under-
ground reservoirs in a m anner that w ill not adversely affect the environ-
m ent. The target form ation for disposal should be geologically and
m echanically isolated from usable sources of w ater. This form ation w ill
not contain com m ercial quantities of oil and gas.
M any liquid w astes m ay be m anaged using an injection w ell. The highest
volum e fluid that m ay be handled by E& P disposal injection w ells is pro-
14
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
Surface D ischarge
Injection
duced w ater. O ther w astes suitable for injection m ay include: process
w ater, blow dow n liquids, cooling w ater, dehydration and sw eetening
w aste liquids and w aste drilling fluids.
A s a m anagem ent practice, injection (other than annular injection) is an
expensive process requiring extensive planning and control. In m ost
cases, an injection w ell and system w ill require considerable E& P activity
in a particular area to justify the investm ent in drilling a w ell or converting
an existing producing w ellbore to injection service. O ther considerations
include:
G The injection volum e requiredthe volum es of produced w ater and
other liquid or solid w astes to be injected should be determ ined. This
w ill indicate the num ber of w ells to be drilled and connected to the
injection system .
G The nature of the form ationthe form ation to receive the w aste
should have sufficient perm eability, porosity, thickness and areal
extent, and low reservoir pressure in order to handle the forecast
volum e and injection rate on a long-term basis. The geology of som e
areas m ay be unsuitable for injection due to the presence of extensive
geological faults resulting in reservoirs sm all in areal extent, form ations
that seal poorly around a w ell, form ations that tend to fracture to the
surface, or form ations w ith insufficient perm eability or close proxim ity
to aquifers.
G The m echanism for transportation of the w aste to the injection w ella
gathering system and pum ping facilities m ay be necessary or the
transport could be via tank truck or other m eans.
G Pre-treatm ent(s) necessary before injectiontreatm ents necessary
before injecting produced w ater into a salt w ater disposal w ell m ay
include oil rem oval, coagulation and sedim entation to rem ove
suspended solids, filtration, aeration, oxygen exclusion and rem oval,
and bacteria and m ineral scale treatm ent. Solid w astes m ay have to be
ground and slurried prior to annular injection.
Annular Injection
A nnular injection is a disposal m ethod w here pum pable w astes (usually
reserve pit fluids) are injected into the surface casing or production casing
annulus (or other casing or casing annulus). This practice should be m an-
aged so that the w astes do not enter underground sources of w ater.
A nnular injection is usually a one-tim eoption and is not suitable for con-
tinuous disposal. The reasons for this include the m echanical inability to
clean the disposal zone of accum ulated debris and the threat of corrosion
of the production casing string and the interior of the surface pipe or other
casing. If the surface pipe is breached by corrosion during long term injec-
tion service, the injected fluids m ay enter usable w ater sources.
Downhole Injection
D ow nhole disposal of w aste m uds and cuttings, both oil and w ater based,
from both onshore and offshore w ells m ay be suitable. The principle and
practice is the sam e as for annular injection, described above, except that
the liquid or slurried m ud w aste is pum ped dow nhole. D ue to the large
particle sizes, drill cuttings cannot be injected dow nhole directly as they
w ill quickly plug the receiving form ation. The cuttings m ust be broken up
into sm all particles and slurried w ith m ud or w ater before they can be
injected. System s typically include a grindingm achine, pum ps, recirculat-
ing lines, tanks and shakers or desanders to rem ove large solids.
15
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S
M any organic com pounds present in E& P w astes m ay be biodegraded to
carbon dioxide and w ater using natural biological processes. H ow ever,
natural biodegradation of contam inants tends to be rate lim ited due to lim -
itations on the biological processes. These lim itations m ay be overcom e
by optim ising the biological conditions. The m ost im portant factors for
control of biological degradation of hydrocarbons are:
G an adequate supply of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria
G availability of sufficient oxygen (and m ixing) for cell m etabolism
G availability and balance of nutrients and m icro-nutrients necessary for
optim um bacterial m etabolism
G m oisture control
G tem perature and pH
G salinity
The concentration and type of com pounds to be degraded m ay have a sig-
nificant im pact on the biodegradation process. Som e com pounds m ay be
readily degraded at low concentrations but inhibit degradation at higher
concentrations (for exam ple, som e hydrocarbon com pounds m ay be toxic
to degrading organism s at high concentrations). O ther com pounds m ay be
degraded very slow ly by biological processes, require an acclim atisation
period or require co-m etabolites for degradation. In general, the com posi-
tion of an organic w aste should be exam ined to determ ine the feasibility
of reaching desired treatm ent levels. H igh levels of asphaltenes and/or
polynuclear arom atic hydrocarbons (PA H ) in a w aste m ay m ake biological
treatm ent an unlikely option for rapid rem oval of the hydrocarbon fraction.
C onversely, high concentrations of alkanes in a w aste w ould m ake it a
good candidate for biological treatm ent. In general, the biodegradability of
petroleum hydrocarbon fractions follow s the relationship: saturates > aro-
m atics > polars > asphaltenes.
H ydrocarbon degrading m icrobes are ubiquitous in the environm ent.
H ow ever, they m ay be present in very low concentrations in som e w aste
stream s, environm ents exposed to extrem e conditions, or m aterials con-
tam inated by extrem ely high concentrations of certain com pounds. If
m icrobial populations are low in a w aste, native soils m ay often provide the
m icrobial inocula necessary for biodegradation (as described in the land-
farm ing, landspreading and com posting sections below ). If for som e reason
soil m icrobes are inadequate or the w aste conditions are particularly harsh,
strains of bacteria adapted to m etabolise hydrocarbons under the desired
conditions m ay be added. W aste biological sludges from refinery w aste
w ater treatm ent system s, if available, are an excellent source of hydrocar-
bon degrading bacteria.
O f the biological treatm ents described below , landfarm ing and landspread-
ing m ay be considered disposal options as w ell as treatm ent. C om posting
processes and bioreactors generally convert the w aste into a less harm ful
product for subsequent use or disposal. R ates of biodegradation are high-
est for bioreactors and com posting, and low est for the less favourable bio-
logical conditions generally found in landfarm ing and landspreading.
Landfarming
Landfarm ing system s have been used for the treatm ent of oily petroleum
industry w astes for m any years. The landfarm ing process involves the
controlled and repeated application of w aste on a soil surface in order to
biodegrade hydrocarbon constituents by using m icroorganism s naturally
present in the soil. The landfarm ing area is periodically tilled to provide the
necessary m ixing and oxygen transfer. A ctive landfarm ing m ay include
addition of w ater, nutrients and other m aterials to enhance the biodegra-
16
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
B iotreatm ent M ethods
dation process in the w aste/soil m ixture, and to prevent the developm ent
of conditions that m ight prom ote leaching and m obilisation of inorganic
contam inants. The conditions under w hich degradation takes place are
typically aerobic. Volatilisation and dilution are tw o other im portant m echa-
nism s for reduction of degradation products in land applications of w aste.
Landfarm ing should not be confused w ith landfilling or burial, in w hich the
w aste is deposited in m an-m ade or natural excavations for an indefinite
period of tim e. The conditions under w hich landfilled and buried w astes
are stored are usually anaerobic, w hich typically results in m uch slow er
degradation.
C are should be taken to avoid landfarm ing of m aterial w hich contains sig-
nificant levels of biologically available heavy m etals, persistent toxic com -
pounds, or low specific activity (LSA ) scale. A t inappropriate loadings,
these m ay accum ulate in the soil to a level that renders the land unfit for
further use. A site m onitoring program m e is recom m ended to ensure such
accum ulation is not occurring.
C onsiderations for the application of landfarm ing should also include the
site topography and hydrology, and the physical and chem ical com position
of the w aste and resultant w aste/soil m ixture. W aste application rates
should be controlled to m inim ise the possibility of run-off. W hen a facility
is properly designed, operated, and m onitored, landfarm ing is usually a rel-
atively cost-effective and sim ple technique. Landfarm s m ay require gov-
ernm ent perm its or approval and, depending on soil conditions, m ay
require a liner and/or groundw ater m onitoring w ells. M oisture control to
m inim ise dust (particulates) m ay also be necessary during extended dry
conditions.
Landspreading
The treatm ent processes involved in landspreading are sim ilar to those in
landfarm ing. H ow ever, landspreading refers to the one-tim e application of
liquid or solid w aste to a site. Landspreading m ay be an appropriate tech-
nique to reduce the organic content of a w aste. A s in landfarm ing, inorgan-
ic com pounds and m etals are not only diluted into the soil, but m ay be
incorporated into the m atrix through chelation, exchange reactions, cova-
lent bonding etc., or m ay becom e less soluble through oxidation, precipita-
tion and pH effects.
In landspreading as in landfarm ing, aerobic biodegradation of hydrocarbons
m ay be enhanced by nutrient addition to the w aste/soil m ixture and by
periodic tillage of the m ixture (to increase aeration). For E& P w astes, salts
and hydrocarbons are m ost frequently the com ponents w hich lim it the
application rate of a w aste on a site. H ydrocarbon concentrations m ay be
m onitored after landspreading to m easure progress and determ ine
w hether biodegradation processes should be enhanced.
In general, there is little regulatory guidance concerning landspreading
practices. This is prim arily due to the fact that landspreading sites only
receive a single application of w aste. This practice reduces the potential
for the accum ulation of w aste com ponents in the soil, as m ight be the
case in landfarm ing sites that receive m ultiple applications of w astes.
C onstruction of a containm ent system (liners) or m onitoring of leachates
from the site is seldom required for landspreading sites. H ow ever, site
topography and hydrology, and the physical and chem ical com position of
the w aste and resultant w aste/soil m ixture, should still be assessed and
w aste application rates controlled to m inim ise the possibility of run-off.
17
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S
Landspreading is m ost effectively used as a disposal m ethod for drilling
fluids and cuttings w ith low levels of hydrocarbons and salts, but it m ay
also be useful for other E& P w astes w ith these sam e characteristics.
C haracterisation of a w aste, and treatability studies can be used to deter-
m ine w hether landspreading m ay be effectively im plem ented.
Composting
C om posting is a solid phase biological treatm ent technique sim ilar to land
treatm ent. B iodegradation rates are enhanced by im proving porosity, aera-
tion, m oisture content, and operating tem perature. It m ay be possible for
com post m ixtures w ith up to ten percent hydrocarbon to be reduced to
less than one percent in four to eight w eeks.
C haracteristics of com posting are:
G W aste is m ixed w ith bulking agents (e.g. w ood chips, straw , rice hulls
or husks) to provide increased porosity and aeration potential. C are
should be taken to ensure the bulking agent provides sufficient
porosity to allow aeration even at high m oisture levels.
G M anure or agricultural w astes m ay be added to increase the w ater
holding capacity of the w aste/m edia m ixture and to provide trace
nutrients.
G N itrogen and phosphorous based fertilisers, as w ell as trace m inerals
(e.g. Fe, C u, M o, M n, Zn, B , C o, N i) m ay be added to enhance
m icrobial activity.
G M ixtures of the w aste, soil (to provide indigenous bacteria) and other
additives, m ay be placed in piles sm all enough (less than 3 feet deep)
to be tilled for aeration, or placed in containers or on platform s
designed to allow forcing of air through the com posting m ixture.
C om posting in closed containers allow s for control of volatiles.
G The com post m ixture is m aintained near 4060 percent w ater by
w eight to provide optim al m oisture conditions for biodegradation.
G C om post system s are characterised by elevated tem peratures (3070 C )
w ithin the com post m ixture. The elevated tem perature increases
m icrobial m etabolism , but should be closely m onitored to ensure
tem peratures do not exceed 70 C (m ay cause cell death). Tem perature
m ay be controlled by tilling the soil pile or by forced aeration.
The degradation of organic com pounds using com posting techniques can
be m uch m ore efficient than landspreading or landfarm ing techniques. In
addition, treated w aste is contained w ithin the com posting facility and its
properties m ay be readily m onitored. C om posted w astes that m eet
health-based criteria m ay be reused as soil conditioners, landfill cover,
clean fill, etc.
Biological Treatment in Tanks
The sam e aerobic biological reaction that occurs during landfarm ing or
com posting processes m ay be accom plished at an accelerated rate using
an open or closed vessel or im poundm ent. The process is typically operat-
ed as a batch or sem i-continuous process. N utrients are added to a slurry
of w ater and w aste, and oxygen (for aerobic degradation) is provided by
air sparging and/or intensive m echanical m ixing of the reactor contents.
The m echanical m ixing also provides a high degree of contact betw een
m icroorganism s and the w aste com ponent to be biodegraded. A source of
m icrobes capable of degrading the organic constituents of the w aste m ay
also be required to accelerate start-up of the system .
O perating conditions (tem perature, pH , oxygen transport and m ixing, and
nutrient concentrations) m ay be easily m onitored and controlled in tank
18
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
based bioreactor system s. This control m akes optim isation of biological
processes possible, hence ensuring the best rate of biodegradation.
B ioreactors generally require less space than land-based biological treat-
m ent processes. A disadvantage of bioreactors is that the m aintenance
and capital investm ent required is high relative to other form s of biological
treatm ent.
A fter reaching the desired level of treatm ent, the disposal m ethod for
residual reactor contents w ill be dictated by the concentrations of the
rem aining com ponents. D epending on the constituents, liquids m ay be
transported to w aste w ater treatm ent facilities, injected or discharged.
A fter dew atering, solids m ay be buried, applied to soils, used as fill, or fur-
ther treated to stabilise com ponents such as m etals.
Biological TreatmentPackage Units
A nother variation of the optim ised aerobic biological w aste treatm ent sys-
tem is an activated sludge process com m ercially available in self-contained
package units for the treatm ent of sanitary w astes. The system typically
includes an aeration tank w ith an aerator system , a clarifier tank w ith
sludge recycle and a chlorination system for the final effluent. The process
is operated continuously w ith an influent loading rate set to the feeding
rate of the m icroorganism s to allow the biodegradation of the organic con-
stituents. Follow ing the m anufacturers recom m endations for operation is
suggested.
A lthough com m ercially available package units are highly efficient, they
m ust be protected from biological upsets. C are m ust be taken to prevent
the inadvertent dum ping of cleaning chem icals, solvents, used oils and
strong acids, caustics or detergents to the sanitary sew er collection system .
There are a variety of w aste treatm ent techniques based upon the applica-
tion of heat to w aste m aterials. The resulting products from these tech-
niques w ill depend on the am ount of heat em ployed. Low tem perature
treatm ents m ay allow for recovery of hydrocarbons and w ater from
w astes, w hereas the use of high tem perature technologies m ay destroy
organic com pounds via com bustion.
Incineration
Incineration uses com bustion to convert w astes into less bulky m aterials.
Incineration can refer to the practice of open burning of w astes in pits,
although the degree of com bustion achieved in com m ercial incinerators
w ill be difficult to achieve in open burning. This is because com m ercial
incinerators can control the residence tim e, tem perature and turbulence
w ithin the incineration cham ber to optim ise com bustion. These incinera-
tors are often equipped w ith air pollution control devices to rem ove incom -
plete com bustion products, rem ove particulate em issions, and reduce SO
x
and N O
x
em issions. There are m any types of incinerators, and m any air
pollution control m echanism s.
Incinerators are usually used to destroy organic w astes w hich pose high
levels of risk to health and the environm ent. A s a rule, incineration of m ost
E& P w astes is not necessary. H ow ever, if operations are located in a sen-
sitive environm ent and other disposal options are not available, then incin-
eration m ay be the best w ay to m anage oily w astes from E& P operations.
B ecause of its durability and ability to incinerate alm ost any w aste, regard-
less of particle size or com position, the type of incinerator best suited for
19
Therm al Treatm ent M ethods
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S
m any E& P w astes is the rotary kiln. A rotating kiln tum bles the w aste to
provide extensive contact w ith hot burner gases. D epending on the size
and com plexity of an operation, sm aller incinerators can also be effective.
D isposal of solids rem aining after incineration should be m anaged proper-
ly. W hen organic com ponents of the w aste are incinerated, m etals con-
centrations in the rem aining solids w ill increase. A n operator should
ensure that incinerator ashes resulting from the treatm ent of its w astes
are properly handled and disposed. Stabilisation m ay be required to pre-
vent release of harm ful leachates into the environm ent.
Cement KilnsFuels Blending
The use of a cem ent kiln, w hen available, is usually an attractive and less
expensive alternative to incineration of E& P oily w astes. O ily w aste m ay
go into a fuel blending program m e to replace fuel otherw ise needed to
fire the kiln.
The retention tim e and tem perature (typically 1,400 to 1,500 C ) w ithin a
cem ent kiln are adequate to achieve therm al destruction of organics.
C em ent kilns m ay also have pollution control devices to m inim ise air em is-
sions from the process. The ash from w astes com busted in the kiln w ill
becom e incorporated into the cem ent m atrix. These ashes m ay provide a
desirable source of alum inium , silica, clay and other m inerals that are typi-
cally added in the cem ent raw m aterial feed stream .
Open Burning
O pen burning is typically used to dispose of cam p refuse, construction
m aterial, and hydrocarbon containing m aterials w ith properties or in areas
that m ake recycling, recovery, or transport unsuitable. W hen these condi-
tions exist and regulations perm it burning, burning should be conducted in
approved areas during daytim e hours and should not cause a nuisance.
The possible effects of em issions of particulates and products of incom -
plete com bustion should be considered, and com bustion m ethods that
m inim ise em issions should be em ployed, w hen available.
Thermal Desorption Systems
A therm al desorption system is a non-oxidising process using heat to des-
orb oil from oily w astes. M ost therm al system s burn fuel to provide heat to
volatilise the oil, but there are som e system s that use electric or electro-
m agnetic energy for heat. Therm al desorption system s are generally of tw o
types: low tem perature system s and high tem perature system s. The w ork-
ing tem perature of low -tem perature system s is usually 250 to 350 C ,
w hile high tem perature system s m ay em ploy tem peratures up to 520 C .
Low tem perature system s m ay be sufficient to treat w astes w ith light oils.
H igh tem perature system s w ill be able to achieve low er final oil contents
for w astes containing heavier oils.
Therm al desorption of w aste stream s w ill produce various secondary
w aste stream s: solids, w ater condensate, oil condensate, and possibly an
air stream from the condenser. Each of these stream s m ay require analysis
to determ ine its characteristics so that the best recycle/disposal option can
be chosen. This is im portant if the original w aste had high salts or m etals
levels, or if there are no w astew ater treatm ent facilities on site, since addi-
tional treatm ent m ay be required to reduce the potential for environm ental
im pact from these stream s. In the case of air em issions, analysis m ay sug-
gest the need for air control m easures to capture certain constituents.
20
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
Solidification, stabilisation and encapsulation are often discussed together
as they m ay be jointly achieved by som e processes. In general, these pro-
cesses produce dry solids (either as a m onolith or a dry granular solid sim i-
lar to coarse soil). W astes treated by these technologies are stored and
not destroyed. H ow ever, the concentrations or m obilities of constituents
of concern in the treated w aste m ay be different from those in the original
w aste.
C em ent-based and pozzolanic (e.g. flyash) processes, as w ell as chem ical
stabilisation processes, have been applied in the oil industry to solidify
and/or stabilise w astes. These processes are especially effective for stabil-
isation of m etals in the w astes because, at the high pH of the cem ent m ix-
ture, m ost m etal com pounds are converted into non-biologically available
insoluble m etal hydroxides. H ow ever, high concentrations of organic com -
pounds, salts and bentonite have been show n to interfere w ith the curing
process, and therefore lim it the application of this treatm ent technique.
H ydrocarbons and salts do not interact w ith the cem ent m atrix and are
physically rather than chem ically bound w ithin the m atrix.
Landfills are generally specially constructed and m onitored facilities
designed to accom m odate burial of large volum es of w astes. H ow ever,
som e landfills m ay be little m ore than open dum ps. A landfill m ay be con-
structed in a m anner that m akes it an appropriate disposal site for certain
toxic w astes. A key consideration in the operation of a landfill site is the
need to ensure long-term containm ent. D esign considerations for a landfill
should, therefore, include:
G A n im perm eable lining to contain the landfill contents. Liners m ay be
constructed of clay, plastic sheeting and/or m ulti-layer linings w ith
integrated drainage system s.
G M onitoring boreholes or leachate collection system s to provide a
m eans for regular inspection of the effectiveness of the containm ent.
G Special provisions for disposal of liquid w astes, or prohibition of liquids
disposal. If disposal of liquids is perm itted, the conditions should be
controlled to prevent leaching. The landfill design should include
arrangem ents for the collection and treatm ent of leachate.
The operator should keep in m ind that all landfills m ay not be constructed
to the sam e standards, and that industrial w astes should only be disposed
of in sites w ith the proper design criteria and proper m onitoring and m ain-
tenance program m es. Landfilled m aterials should not be capable of react-
ing to generate excess heat or noxious gases. Special system s m ay need
to be installed to collect generated m ethane. The operator should rem em -
ber that landfilled w astes are not destroyed, but are actually in long-term
storage. D isposal sites should be operated either by the w aste generator
w ho w ill m aintain responsibility for its ow n w astes or by a properly m an-
aged disposal facility.
D ue to its sim plicity, burial of w astes in sm all pits at drilling and production
sites has been a popular m eans of w aste disposal in the past. H ow ever,
w ith current aw areness of pollutant m igration pathw ays, the risks associ-
ated w ith burial of w astes should be carefully considered. In general,
w astes w ith high oil, salt, or biologically available m etal content, industrial
chem icals, and other m aterials w ith harm ful com ponents that could
m igrate from the pit to contam inate usable w ater resources should not be
buried. B urial m ay be the best m ethod of disposal for inert unrecyclable
m aterials. If a pits contents contain concentrations of constituents only
21
Solidification, Stabilisation and Encapsulation
Landfill
B urial
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S
slightly elevated above levels regulated for disposal, then burial provides a
sim ple m echanism to reduce concentrations in the w aste, via dilution w ith
soil, as it is being disposed. This m ay often be the case for w ater based
m uds and cuttings. In dilution burial, the pit contents are m ixed w ith soils
from the pit and surrounding areas until the pit contents m eet specifica-
tions for burial, then the pit is covered and the surface graded.
B urial is a logical choice for w astes that have been stabilised, since m igra-
tion of the constituents of the w aste w ill be retarded by the stabilisation
process. H ow ever, if there is a reason for extra caution at a particular site
(either because of the constituents in the original w aste, or because of the
hydrogeologic characteristics of the site) then additional barriers to m igra-
tion such as barrier w alls around the pit, liners around the pit contents, or
a cap to prevent vertical m igration, could also be installed. A lternatively,
and if available, the w aste could be sent to a properly m anaged facility
designed to handle that type of w aste.
C onsideration of factors such as the depth to groundw ater, and the type
of soil surrounding the pit should be m ade before w astes are buried. This
ensures proper protection of soil and w ater resources.
W hen burial and/or pit closure is com plete, the area should be graded to
prevent w ater accum ulation, and revegetated w ith native species to
reduce potential for erosion and prom ote full recovery of the areas
ecosystem .
The use of pits, earthen or lined, is an integral part of E& P w aste m anage-
m ent operations. H istorically, on-site pits have been used for the m anage-
m ent of drilling solids, evaporation and storage of produced w ater, m an-
agem ent of w orkover/com pletion fluids and for em ergency containm ent
of produced fluids.
In general, pits should be as sm all as possible and be strategically located
to prevent spillage of w aste m aterials onto the drilling or production site.
Pits should be lined unless site characteristics ensure that there w ill be no
significant threat to w ater resources. In areas w here it m ay be necessary
to construct pits adjacent to w ater bodies or on sloping terrain, special
engineering precautions should be taken to ensure the integrity of the pit.
Free hydrocarbons should be rem oved from pits and returned to the pro-
duction process for recovery as soon as possible, and precautions should
be taken to prevent pit disposal of chem icals, refuse, debris or any other
m aterials w hich w ere originally not intended to be placed in pits. These
m aterials can alter the nature of the bulk fluids in the pit and m ake dispos-
al m ore difficult.
A lthough pits are an accepted com ponent of E& P operations, they could
represent an environm ental liability if m anaged im properly. Pits should be
for tem porary use, and should not be used for disposal of oil. Pits should
be closed as soon as practicable and their closure should follow the
required or generally accepted practices of the region.
Solvent extraction uses solvents to extract oil from oily solids or sludges.
Solvents used for extraction include carbon dioxide, propane, hexane, tri-
ethylam ine, m ethylene chloride and certain proprietary solvent m ixtures.
A n elaborate solvent recovery system is generally em ployed in order to
reuse the solvent.
22
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
Pit M anagem ent
Solvent Extraction
A properly operated solvent extraction system w ill recover and recycle vir-
tually all solvent used for extraction, and allow oil to be recovered. A
closed loop system for the vapour phases generated should ensure that
there are no direct air em issions from the process. Safety w ill be a consid-
eration for system s w hich use high tem peratures, high pressures or
volatile solvents.
D isposal options for w astew ater separated from the solids, and the treat-
ed solids, w ill depend on the constituents of the treated stream s.
Extracted w ater m ay be injected or require treatm ent prior to discharge.
Treated solids m ay be heat treated to rem ove residual solvents prior to
disposal. Solids w ith significant biologically available m etal contents m ay
be stabilised to prevent m igration after disposal.
23
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S
A PPEN D IX 1
A R eview of Solidification/Stabilisation Technology, W iles, C . C ., Journal of
H azardous M aterials,14 (1987), 521.
A n E valuation of O rganic M aterials that Interfere w ith
Stabilisation/Solidification Processes, in Petroleum C ontam inated Soils,
Volum e I, R em ediation Techniques, Environm ental Fate, R isk A ssessm ent.
C ullinane, M . J., Jr. and B ricka, R . M ., (Kostecki, P. T. and C alabrese, E. J.,
eds.) Lew is Publishers, C helsea, M ichigan, 1989, 127136.
A P I E nvironm ental G uidance D ocum ent: O nshore S olid W aste
M anagem ent in Exploration and Production O perations, A PI docum ent
81110850, January 1989.
C om bustion and Incineration Processes: A pplications in Environm ental
Engineering, N iessen, W . R ., M arcel D ekker, Inc., N ew York, N ew York,
1978.
C om posting of C hem ical Industrial W astes Prior to Land A pplication, in
Land Treatm ent of H azardous W aste,W illson, G . B ., Sikora, L. J. and Parr,
J. F., (Parr, J. F., M arsh, P. B . and Kla, J. M ., eds.), N oyes D ata C orp., Park
R idge, N . J., 1983.
C hem ical U sage in O ffshore O il and G as Production System s, H udgins,
C . M ., R eport to A PI, 1989.
E & P Forum G uidelines for the P lanning of D ow nhole Injection
Program m es for O il B ased M ud W astes and A ssociated C uttings from
O ffshore W ells,R eport N o. 2.56/187, O ctober 1993.
E& P Forum O il Industry O perating G uideline for Tropical R ainforests,
R eport N o. 2.49/170, A pril 1991.
Exploration and Production Industry A ssociated W aste R eport,A PI docu-
m ent 0300-004-008, M ay 1988.
H andbook for Stabilisation/ Solidification of H azardous W astes,C ullinane,
M . J., Jones, L. W . and M alone, P. G ., EPA /540/2-86/001, June 1986,
(N TIS no. PB 87-116745).
H andbook of H azardous W aste Incineration, B runner, C . R ., TA B
Professional and R eference B ooks, B lue R idge Sum m it, Pennsylvania,
1989.
O il and G as Exploration and Production O perations in M angrove A reas
G uidelines for E nvironm ental P rotection, W orld C onservation U nion
(IU C N )/E& P Forum joint publication, 1993, ISB N 2831701872, E& P
Forum R eport N o. 2.54/184.
O il and G as Industry Exploration and Production W astes, A PI docum ent
471-01-09, July 1987.
O il and G as Exploration and Production in A rctic and Sub-A rctic O nshore
R egionsG uidelines for Environm ental Protection, W orld C onservation
U nion (IU C N )/E& P Forum joint publication, 1993, ISB N 2831701880,
E& P Forum R eport N o. 2.55/185.
24
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
R eferences
O ilfield Environm ental C ontrol Technology: A Synopsis. W ojtanow icz, A . K.
Journal of Petroleum Technology,166173, February 1993.
O nsite Treatm ent: H ydrocarbon C ontam inated S oil, W estern S tates
Petroleum A ssociation, 1990.
Production W aste M anagem ent H andbook for the A lberta Petroleum
Industry,C anadian Petroleum A ssociation, D ecem ber 1990.
S olid-W aste D isposal: D eep W ell Injection, S m ith, M . E ., C hem ical
Engineering,A pril 9, 1979, 107112.
The E ffect of V olatile O rganic C om pounds on the A bility of
Solidification/Stabilisation Technologies to A ttenuate M obile Pollutants,
Kyles, J. H ., M alinow ski, K. C ., Leithner, J. S. and Stanczyk, T. F., in
P roceedings of the N ational C onference on H azardous W astes and
H azardous M aterials,H M C R I (1987), 152157.
25
A PPEN D IX 1
A PPEN D IX 2
acidising The treatm ent of a w ell by injection w ith a solution
of acid (hydrochloric, hydrofluoric, acetic, form ic, cit-
ric) to m aintain or increase perm eability of a rock
stratum by dissolving pore blockage due to fine parti-
cles from the reservoir stratum , precipitated m ateri-
als or corrosion products, so im proving productivity
or injectivity (see injection) of a w ell.
annulus The space surrounding a cylindrical object w ithin a
cylinder; the space around a pipe in a w ellbore, the
outer w all of w hich m ay be the w all of either the
borehole or the casing, som etim es term ed the
annular space.
aquifers R ock strata w hich contain, and are perm eable to,
w ater. The w ater m ay be fresh or saline, and either
potable or non-potable.
B TEX B enzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and ortho-, m eta-,
and para-Xylene.
biologically available A lso bio-available. Substances w hich are present in a
form w hich can be taken up by plants or anim als and
w hich m ay be incorporated into their tissues.
biocides M aterials w hich can be added to m uds or reinjected
produced w ater for the purpose of prevention or lim -
itation of grow th of bacteria in the m ud or in the oil-
reservoir rock.
biodegradable Susceptible to breakdow n, into sim pleroften solu-
ble and/or gaseouscom pounds, by m icroorgan-
ism s in the soil, w ater and atm osphere. B iodegrad-
ation often converts toxic organic com pounds into
non- or less-toxic substances.
B O D (biochem ical M easure of the quantity of dissolved oxygen
oxygen dem and) (expressed in parts per m illion) used in the
decom position of organic m atter by biochem ical
action.
brine Salt w ater. M ay be produced w ater or m ixed solutions
m ost com m only containing sodium , potassium , or cal-
cium chloride salts. W hen added to drilling m uds, brine
has three functions: 1. m inim ise reaction betw een
m ud and soluble salts in the strata being drilled; 2.
increase m ud w eight; 3. increase m ud viscosity.
C FC C hlorofluorocarbon.
consolidation C hem ical m ixture pum ped dow n a w ell to stabilise
m aterials the form ation structure or m inim ise w ater production.
com pletion fluid C hem ical m ixture present in the w ell during the
placem ent of production tubing and perforation of
the w ell (m ay be a drilling fluid, or specialised brine).
26
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
G lossary of O il Industry Term s
cuttings The fragm ents of rock dislodged by the drilling bit
and brought to the surface in the drilling m ud.
developm ent w ell W ell drilled in a form ation for the purpose of produc-
ing oil and gas. A lso called a production w ell.
drilling C hem icals used in the form ulation and m aintenance
chem icals of drilling m uds.
drilling fluids Specialised fluid m ade up of a m ixture of clays, w ater
(and som etim es oil) and chem icals, w hich is pum ped
dow n a w ell during drilling operations to cool and lubri-
cate the system , rem ove cuttings and control pressure.
drilling m uds See drilling fluids.
drilling rig See rig.
decom m issioning The act of taking an operating site out of service.
This m ay include the final plugging of w ells and the
rem oval of surface structures.
descalers Substances added to prevent build-up of, and to a
lesser extent rem ove, solids such as calcium carbon-
ates and sulphates deposited on the drill pipe and
casing. Pitting corrosion of m etal can occur under
scale deposits.
dow nhole D ow n a w ell or borehole.
Environm ental A form al, w ritten, technical evaluation of potential
Im pact effects on the environm ent (atm osphere, w ater,
A ssessm ent land, plants and anim als) of a particular event or
activity.
effluents Liquid w aste m aterials discharged from operations.
encapsulation The enclosure of w astes by a non-perm eable sub-
stance. W aste constituents are not chem ically
altered, but their transport w ill be im peded by the
encapsulating m atrix.
exploration The search for reservoirs of oil and gas, w hich
includes aerial and geophysical surveys, geological
studies, core testing and drilling of w ells.
exploration D rilling carried out to determ ine w hether hydrocarbons
drilling are present in a particular area or geological structure or
to learn m ore about subsurface structures.
fracturing The process of cracking open, by applying hydraulic
pressure, the rock form ation around a w ell bore to
increase productivity or injectivity.
fracturing fluid H eavy, viscous fluid pum ped dow n a w ell under high
pressure to fracture the target form ation in order to
enhance fluid flow .
27
A PPEN D IX 2
flaring C ontrolled disposal of surplus com bustible vapours
by igniting them in the atm osphere.
gas processing The separation of constituents from natural gas for
the purpose of m aking saleable products and also for
im proving the quality of the natural gas.
H C FC H ydrochlorofluorocarbon.
H
2
S (hydrogen A pungent, corrosive, toxic gas occurring naturally in
sulphide) som e oil and gas reservoirs (and elsew here),
generated by the m etabolism of certain types of
bacteria.
hydrotest The checking of the integrity of a container (e.g. a
tank or pipe) by filling it w ith w ater under pressure
and testing for any loss of pressure.
injection w ell A w ell used to inject gas or w ater into an oil/gas
reservoir rock to m aintain reservoir pressure during
the secondary recovery process. A lso a w ell used to
inject treated w astes into selected form ations for
disposal.
M SD S/SD S M aterial Safety D ata Sheet used by chem ical suppli-
ers to sum m arise properties of products, including
health, safety and environm ental aspects.
N O R M N aturally O ccurring R adioactive M aterials. Low
Specific A ctivity (LSA ) scale is one exam ple of a
N O R M w aste.
PA H Polynuclear A rom atic H ydrocarbon.
produced w ater W ater originating from the natural oil reservoir, that
is separated from the oil and gas in the production
facility.
production That phase of petroleum operations that deals w ith
bringing the reservoir fluids to the surface and sepa-
rating them , and w ith storing, gauging, and other-
w ise preparing the product for the pipeline.
production C hem icals used to enhance or assist the production
treating chem icals process or protect equipm ent.
reclam ation The activities undertaken to restore a site to a prede-
term ined land-use.
recoverable That proportion of the oil/gas in a reservoir that can
reserves be rem oved using currently available techniques.
rig A collective term used to describe the equipm ent,
including the vessel or structure on w hich the equip-
m ent is installed, required to drill a w ell, the m ost
visible com ponent being the m ast or derrick.
28
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
road oil O il used for dust control or road base stabilisation,
generally spread on the road and incorporated by till-
ing and com paction.
scrubbing Purifying gas by treatm ent w ith a w ater or chem ical
w ash.
seism ic survey A survey conducted to m ap the depths and contours
of rock strata by tim ing the reflections of sound
w aves released from the surface or from dow n a
borehole (shot hole).
shot hole A borehole in w hich an explosive is placed for blast-
ing in use as the energy source for seism ic survey.
solidification The addition of m aterials (saw dust, adsorbent poly-
m ers, etc.) to a w aste to change its physical state and
im prove handling and w eight-bearing characteristics.
stabilisation The chem ical conversion or encapsulation of w aste
to create a com posite m atrix that resists leaching.
stim ulation fluids C hem ical m ixture pum ped dow n a w ell to stim ulate
or enhance the production of hydrocarbons from that
w ell.
vent gases Those gases w hich are released, unburnt to the
atm osphere. Venting m ay be deliberate (for opera-
tional reasons) or accidental.
Vibroseis A com m ercial heavy, vehicle-m ounted, vibration sys-
tem used onshore for the generation of shock (sound)
w aves into the ground during seism ic surveys.
VO C Volatile O rganic C om pounds.
w ater injection The pum ping of w ater into the reservoir rock to m ain-
tain the reservoir pressure.
w ell com pletion The activities and m ethods used to prepare a w ell for
the production of oil and gas. This m ay include estab-
lishm ent of a flow line betw een reservoir and sur-
face.
w ell servicing The m aintenance w ork perform ed on an oil or gas
w ell to im prove or m aintain the production from a
form ation already producing.
w ellbore The hole m ade by drilling or boring; m ay have a cas-
ing in it or it m ay be open, or a portion m ay be cased.
w orkover A process by w hich a com pleted production w ell is
subsequently re-entered and any necessary cleaning,
repair and m aintenance w ork done.
29
A PPEN D IX 2
A PPEN D IX 3
The follow ing form is an exam ple of a w orksheet w hich could be used
w hen developing area w aste m anagem ent plans. C om pletion of such
form s requires input from personnel w ho are fam iliar w ith both operational
and technical aspects of E& P activities. To ensure consistency, proce-
dures used to classify w astes should be defined before com pleting a
w orksheet. These classifications should agree w ith any local regulatory
agency definitions.
The space for specifying the operation/equipm ent generating the w aste
can be used to docum ent the incident or event causing w aste generation.
Exam ples include periodic tank cleaning, spills and leaks. Exam ination of
these records m ay then assist in identifying process or procedure m odifi-
cations to reduce or elim inate w astes. C om pletion of other table item s is
outlined in the legend below .
To determ ine how you w ant to m anage your w aste, list the w astes you
generate, their sources (e.g. operation or equipm ent), volum es (e.g. bbls,
m
3
or tons), frequency of generation (e.g. per day, per w eek, per year),
know n hazardous characteristics (e.g. pH < 2), and classification (degree of
hazard). D escribe the current w aste disposal practices (e.g. onsite or off-
site, disposal m ethod used and nam e of disposal facility). List all the alter-
native w aste m anagem ent options (e.g. m inim isation, road and land
spreading, burial, injection) and record any special constraints that affect
your options. Taking everything into consideration, choose the preferred
m anagem ent option.
30
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
W aste M anagem ent Planning W orksheet
3
1
A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X

3
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING WORKSHEET
Constraints
(Regulatory, Policy,
Disposal, Site
Availability, Cost etc.)
Pref erred
Management
Option
Waste
Management
Options
Current Disposal
Onsite/
Of f site
Disposal
Method
Facility
Name
Waste
Classif ication
Waste
Characteristics
Frequency
of
Generation
Waste
Volume
Operation/
Equipment
Generating
Waste
Waste
DATE: / / LOCATION: PERSON PREPARING WORKSHEET:
A PPEN D IX 4
The follow ing table sum m arises the prim ary types of w aste stream s
encountered during E& P operations. The m ain sources of these stream s
are provided for clarification. The constituents that m ay be of environm en-
tal concern are also sum m arised for each w aste. The inclusion of a con-
stituent in this colum n does not necessarily indicate that the constituent is
alw ays present, or that if the constituent is present that it w ill be of high
enough concentration to w arrant concern. The last colum n of the table
indicates w hich of the individual E& P activities m ay generate the indicated
w aste stream .
32
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
Sum m ary of W astes
G enerated by E& P A ctivities
A = A bandonm ent C = C onstruction and C om m issioning D = D rilling M = M aintenance P = Production S = Seism ic
WASTE STREAM MAIN SOURCES POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTALLY TYPE OF
SIGNIFICANT CONSTITUENTS OPERATION
A bsorbents Spill clean up H ydrocarbons, production chem icals, solvents A C D M P S
A ir Em issions Vent gases N O
x
, SO
x
, H
2
S, C O
x
, VO C , D P
Flare G ases hydrocarbons, carbon, particulates,
B low dow n from bulk chem icals PA H 's, B TEX
A ir Em issions Engine exhausts C O
x
, SO
x
, N O
x
, VO C , PA H s, A C D M P S
form aldehyde, carbon particulates
A ir Em issions Fugitive gases VO C , B TEX A C D M P
B allast w ater Tankers w ith non-segregated H ydrocarbons P
ballast
B oiler/cooling tow er Steam generation facilities Scale inhibitors, biocides, corrosion inhibitors, D M
blow dow n and cooling tow ers heavy m etals, solids
C em ent C em ent slurries H eavy m etals, thinners, viscosifiers, pH , salts D P
C em ent m ix w ater
C em ent returns
C onsolidation C arrier fluids H ydrocarbons P
m aterials Epoxy resins Excess chem icals
C ontam inated soil Spill/leaks H ydrocarbons, heavy m etals, salts, A C D M P S
treating chem icals
C ontam inated R ainw ater run-off Inorganic salts, heavy m etals, solids, A C D M P
drainage w ater R ig w ash production chem icals, detergent,
Process w ater hydrocarbons
W ash w ater
D ehydration and D ehydration processes A m ines, glycols, filter sludges, m etal sulphides,
Sw eetening W astes Sw eetening processes H
2
S, m etals, benzene P
33
A PPEN D IX 4
WASTE STREAM MAIN SOURCES POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTALLY TYPE OF
SIGNIFICANT CONSTITUENTS OPERATION
D om estic sew age Living quarters B O D , solids, detergent, coliform bacteria A C D M P S
D rilling fluid C hem ical containers B iocides, surfactants, salts, m etals, em ulsifiers, D P
chem icals D rilling fluids viscosifiers, organics, pH
D rill cuttings
R ig w ash
Fire fighting agents Fire protection H alons, C FC s, H C FC s, fire fighting foam s A C D M P
equipm ent/facilities
H ydrotest fluids Pipeline hydrotesting activities B O D , solids, biocides, corrosion inhibitors, C
oxygen scavengers, dyes
Incinerator ash Incinerators H eavy m etals, salts, ash A D P
Industrial refuse C leaning m aterials H ydrocarbons, plastic A C M
Insulation
Industrial w aste B atteries A cid, alkali, heavy m etals, PC B s A C M
Transform ers
C apacitors
M aintenance w astes Sandblast (grits) H eavy m etals, hydrocarbons, solids, solvents M
G reases
Fuel oils
Filters
M edical w aste D ressings Pathogenic organism s, plastic, glass, A C D M P
C linical & cleaning m aterials m edicines, needles
B lood sam ples
M ercury Instrum entation M ercury A D M P
O il/gas production
Production testing
O il based m uds D rilling operations H ydrocarbons, inorganic salts, heavy m etals, D
& cuttings solids/cuttings, drilling fluid chem icals
Paint m aterials Paints H eavy m etals, solvent, hydrocarbon C M
Thinners
C oatings
Pigging sludges Pipeline cleaning operations Inorganic salts, heavy m etals, solids, P
production chem icals, N O R M , hydrocarbons,
phenols, arom atics
Process w ater Engine cooling w ater H ydrocarbons, treatm ent chem icals A D M P S
B rake cooling w ater
W ash w ater
A = A bandonm ent C = C onstruction and C om m issioning D = D rilling M = M aintenance P = Production S = Seism ic
34
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
WASTE STREAM MAIN SOURCES POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTALLY TYPE OF
SIGNIFICANT CONSTITUENTS OPERATION
Production chem icals C hem icals containers D em ulsifiers, corrosion inhibitors, w ax P
Spent fluids inhibitors, scale inhibitors, defoam ers, oxygen
Sludges scavengers, biocides, coagulants, flocculants.
C ontam inated chem icals
Produced w ater Production of oil and gas Inorganic salts, heavy m etals, solids, production D P
chem icals, hydrocarbons, benzene, PA H s
Produced sand D rilling/production operations H ydrocarbons, heavy m etals, N O R M P
R efrigerants A ir conditioning/ C FC , H C FC A C M P
refrigerant system s
Scrap m etals A bandoned platform s H eavy m etals, N O R M scales A C M S
U sed pipelines
U sed process equipm ent
U sed tanks
Electrical cables
Em pty drum s
U sed tubulars
U sed casing
Spacers D rilling operations H ydrocarbon, alcohol, arom atics, D P
detergents, surfactants
Spent catalysts C atalyst beds H eavy m etals, hydrocarbons, inorganic salts M P
M olecular sieve
Spent com pletion Production w ell com pletion Inorganic salts,hydrocarbons, D P
fluid activities corrosion inhibitors
Spent stim ulation or Production w ell w orkover Inorganic acids (H C L, H F), hydrocarbons, D P
fracturing fluids activities m ethanol, corrosion inhibitors, oxygen
scavengers, form ation fluids, N O R M ,
gelling agents
Tank & vessel Separation tank sedim ents Inorganic salts, heavy m etals, solids, P
bottom w astes Storage tank sedim ents production chem icals, N O R M ,
W ater drain tank sedim ents hydrocarbons, PA H s
W aste lubricants Equipm ent lube oil changes O rganics, heavy m etals D M S
W ater based D rilling activities H igh pH , inorganic salts, hydrocarbons, D
(include brine) solids/cuttings, drilling fluid chem icals,
m uds & cuttings heavy m etals
A = A bandonm ent C = C onstruction and C om m issioning D = D rilling M = M aintenance P = Production S = Seism ic
35
A PPEN D IX 5
A PPEN D IX 5
The follow ing pages contain descriptions of som e selected w aste stream s
and discussion of possible w aste m anagem ent options for these w astes.
These descriptions are not intended to be all-inclusive but give exam ples
of potential options.
G A tm ospheric Em issions
This covers all pow er plant exhausts, flares, vents and gas leaks in drilling
and oil and gas processing activities.
This can include SO
x
, N O
x
, H
2
S, hydrocarbons, VO C s, particulates and
PA H s.
Waste Management Options
R educe: D esign and operate oil and gas exploration and production
activities and process equipm ent w ith controls and policies
to m inim ise atm ospheric em issions.
M aintain and run all pow er plants under optim al fuel effi-
cient conditions, w hen possible.
R euse: W here possible flare gas should be used as a fuel. N atural
gas m ay also be injected for reservoir m aintenance,
enhanced recovery or used in artificial lift.
R ecycle/ E xploit w aste heat recovery opportunities w here
R ecover: practically possible.
Treatm ent/ Excess produced gas m ay be injected or flared.
D isposal:
C atalytic cham bers, scrubbers or strippers can be installed
on exhaust stacks.
W ater injection into fuel com bustion cham bers m ay reduce
N O
x
em issions.
G C hem ical W aste
This includes any surplus or contam inated chem icals used at all stages of
exploration and production activities. It includes specific item s such as bat-
teries, transform ers and other item s containing or contam inated w ith
chem ical products.
The concerns w ill depend on the com position and the associated safety
and adverse environm ental considerations. These w astes m ay require spe-
cific segregation and disposal techniques.
Waste Management Options
R educe: W herever possible, planning and good housekeeping practices
should be em ployed to m inim ise surplus and contam ination.
Substitution w ith longer life products and those w ith low er
im pacts should be considered.
Specific W aste Inform ation
36
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
R euse: Surplus chem icals m ay be usable in other locations or
returned to vendors, if possible.
M aterials such as cem ent, bentonite, lim e, m ay have alter-
nate use in w aste treatm ent, road construction, landfill site
construction, etc.
R ecycle/ Item s such as lead acid batteries, w et nickel/cadm ium
R ecover: batteries should be sent to recycling facilities if available.
C ertain chem ical w astes m ay contain m etals such as silver
or m ercury w hich could be recovered.
C hem ical solvents m ay be econom ically recovered or used
in a fuel blending program m e.
Treatm ent/ Encapsulation/solidification by m ixing w ith cem ent, lim e or
D isposal: other binder m ay be appropriate prior to disposal.
Special landfill sites m ay be available w hich can accept cer-
tain kinds of chem ical w aste. The possibility of leachate
problem s need to be identified.
For som e organic chem ical w astes, incineration m ay be
the preferred treatm ent option. For chem icals like PC B s,
high tem perature incineration is required to destroy the
com pounds.
G C ontam inated Soil from O il/Fuel Spills
This m ay include soil, beach or shore m aterials arising from the leakage or
spill of hydrocarbons or fuels.
The im pact w ill depend on the type of hydrocarbon and the location of the
spill or leak.
Waste Management Options
R educe: A void spills and leakage by im proved housekeeping, m ain-
tenance and transport procedures.
R euse: N /A
R ecycle/ D epending on the extent of the contam ination, recovery of
R ecover: free liquids m ay be possible.
Treatm ent/ Landfarm ing, landspreading and com posting m ay be
D isposal: applicable if conditions for biological degradation are
favourable. Enhancem ent techniques could be considered.
Incineration, landfill and burial options m ay be lim ited by
availability and the quantity/nature of the contam inated soil.
Stabilisation techniques m ay be applicable prior to disposal.
G D rilling Pit W aste
D rilling pit w astes usually contain both solid and liquid com ponents.
C onstituents of environm ental concern include salt, hydrocarbons, pH ,
drilling chem icals and biologically available heavy m etals. These con-
stituents have the possibility of im pacting soil and w ater quality.
Waste Management Options
R educe: The volum e of drilling pit w astes m ay be reduced by judi-
cious use of rig w ash w ater, by releasing w ater that does
not contain hydrocarbons or high salinity from the pit, by
avoiding the collection of rainw ater run-off in the pit or by
reusing the w ater in the drilling fluid.
D rilling w aste volum e m ay be m inim ised by the use of a
closed loop m ud system .
R euse: Solids m ay be applicable for the lining or capping of landfill
sites, or as a road construction m aterial.
R ecycle/ R ecovered w eighting m aterials and drilling fluids m ay be
R ecover: recycled into the drilling fluid of the sam e or different w ell.
C om m ercial m ud plants m ay take used drilling fluids for
recycle.
Treatm ent/ O ptions for the disposal of aqueous drilling pit w astes
D isposal: include surface discharge and injection. B efore the aque-
ous phase can be surface discharged, it should be treated
to rem ove hydrocarbons and excess suspended solids and
to adjust the pH to w ithin the acceptable range. The dis-
solved salt and biologically available m etal content m ust
be at a level w hich w ill not cause an adverse im pact on
the receiving environm ent. Liquids w hich cannot be treat-
ed to a standard suitable for surface discharge m ay have
to be injected.
The options for m anagem ent of solid drilling pit w astes
include burial in the pit; landfarm ing, landspreading or com -
posting to reduce organic content; therm al treatm ents to
recover or destroy organics; injection; and stabilisation or
solidification.
G D rum s/C ontainers
M etal and plastic containers are used for a w ide range of lubricants and
chem icals used throughout the industry. The accum ulation and disposal of
these can be problem atic. D rum s and containers inevitably contain variable
quantities of residues. The im pact arises from both the volum e and pres-
ence of residues.
Waste Management options
R educe: B ulk transport and storage should be considered for high
volum e consum ption item s.
R euse: C ertain containers can be refilled from bulk storage and
reused. W here possible, non-refillable containers should be
returned to the vendor for reuse, or to a com pany specialis-
ing in container refurbishm ent.
37
A PPEN D IX 5
D rum s and containers can be used for the transportation of
suitable w astes provided safety considerations are not
com prom ised.
R ecycle/ B oth m etal and certain plastic drum s and containers m ay
R ecover: be recycled if outlets are available. H ow ever, this m ay
require that they be cleaned of any residues beforehand.
Treatm ent/ D rum s should be crushed prior to landfill. The nature of
D isposal: any residues m ay restrict this option or require pre-cleaning.
Incineration m ay be applicable to plastic containers, but
incinerators m ay need to be equipped w ith air pollution
control devices.
G G arbageInert Solid W aste
This includes w ood, plastics, paper, food w aste, general garbage and inert
construction and m aintenance m aterials.
The environm ental im pact m ay arise from the encouragem ent of verm in
by food w astes, production of gases by biodegradable m aterials and
leachates w here other site m aterials such as chem ical residues have been
m ixed in w ith the w aste.
Waste Management Options
R educe: P ackaging w astes such as paper and plastic can be
reduced by the use of bulk handling system s or big bags.
Segregation of com ponents such as w ood, plastic and paper,
for recycling or reuse w ill reduce the quantity for disposal.
R euse: W here the inert w aste consists totally of construction
m aterial, it m ay be usable as infill.
R ecycle/ M aterials such as w ood, paper and m etals m ay be
R ecover: segregated for recycling.
G eneral garbage is frequently incinerated and som e inciner-
ators are fitted w ith heat recovery.
Treatm ent/ Landfill is the m ost com m on disposal m ethod em p-
D isposal: loyed. Local conditions m ay lim it this option. B urial of these
w astes m ay be an option w hen a suitable landfill is
not available.
Incineration using fixed or m obile facilities w ill greatly
reduce the w aste volum e for landfill.
Techniques such as com posting m ay be used to reduce the
volum e of dom estic w aste through biodegradation.
G Pit, Tank and Vessel B ottom W astes
This w aste consists of w ater, accum ulated hydrocarbons, solids, sand and
em ulsions w hich collect in the low er sections of slop oil tanks, crude oil
stock tanks, closed w ater drain tanks, open w ater drain tanks and other
38
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
storage and separation vessels as w ell as in produced w ater storage or
em ergency pits.
C onstituents of these w astes that m ay im pact selection of w aste m anage-
m ent and disposal m ethods include hydrocarbons, salts, m etals, produc-
tion chem icals and occasionally N O R M . Possible environm ental im pacts
w ill depend on the concentrations of these constituents and the w aste
m anagem ent option(s) chosen.
Waste Management Options
R educe: Im proved housekeeping procedures m ay reduce the volum e
of solids collected in drainage w ater storage tanks. The w aste
volum e m ay be reduced through evaporation or dew atering.
R euse: Suitable w astes m ay be m ixed w ith absorbent m aterial (e.g.
lim e) and applied as road surfacing m aterial, or m ixed w ith
aggregate in an asphalt batch process.
R ecycle/ S ludges containing significant oil m ay be reclaim ed
R ecover: either onsite or offsite for the rem oval and recovery of
hydrocarbons.
Treatm ent/ These sludges m ay be landfilled, if dry.
D isposal:
These sludges m ay be landspread or landfarm ed.
C onsideration w ill have to be m ade of the biodegradability
of the organics, availability of land, loading rates, and possi-
bility of ground or surface w ater contam ination.
These sludges m ay be incinerated, w ith proper pollution
control devices in place.
G Process D rainage W aste System
The process facility drainage system w astes w ill include w ashdow n w ater,
boiler and cooling w ater blow dow ns, leaks and spills. The hazards w ill
depend on the nature of the sources. A s w ith surface w ater drainage,
physical effects such as erosion and tem perature m ay be considerations.
Waste Management Options
R educe: A leak m inim isation strategy should form an integral part of
facility design and m aintenance procedures. A ll fuel, hydro-
carbon and hazardous chem ical storage areas should be suf-
ficiently bunded. D rip pans should be used w here needed.
Spill clean-up procedures should be developed.
R euse: Process w ater m ay be reused for activities requiring low er
w ater quality (e.g. rig w ashing or flare suppression).
R ecycle/ N /A
R ecover:
Treatm ent/ See rainw ater drainage
D isposal:
39
A PPEN D IX 5
G Produced W ater
O riginating from oil and gas production/processing, produced w ater w ill
contain variable quantities of m ineral salts, solids, suspended and dis-
solved hydrocarbons, and other organic and inorganic com ponents, and
m ay be at high tem perature. The com position m ay change w ith tim e. It
m ay require pre-treatm ent prior to disposal.
The environm ental im pact w ill be highly dependent on the quantities
involved, the com ponents, the receiving environm ent and dispersion char-
acteristics.
B efore significant or long-term discharge of produced w ater to the environ-
m ent is carried out, an environm ental im pact study should be carried out.
Waste Management Options
R educe: W ater shut off treatm ents, re-perforation.
R euse: R e-injection for reservoir pressure m aintenance or sec-
ondary recovery of oil.
Q uality m ay allow use for agricultural purposes or reuse as
w ash w ater.
R ecycle/ H eat content.
R ecover: D e-salination.
Treatm ent/ Surface discharge into the environm ent m ay be possible
D isposal: depending on the w ater quality, volum e and flow . Prim ary
treatm ent such as de-oiling w ill often be required. B io-treat-
m ent m ay be practical for low volum es.
D ow nhole injection to suitable form ations other than the
producing form ation m ay be possible. H ow ever, the possi-
bility of contam inating usable w ater aquifers m ust be taken
into account.
Evaporation and subsequent disposal of salts m ay be possible.
G R ainw ater D rainage
This w ill com e from all areas of the site/facilities. Surface drainage w ill be
susceptible to contam ination from spills, leakage and leaching. The envir-
onm ental im pact w ill depend on such contam ination along w ith physical
considerations such as erosion.
Waste Management Options
R educe: C ontam ination of the surface drainage w ater should be
avoided as this w ill be considerably easier than any subse-
quent treatm ent. Thought should be given to the segregation
of drainage from liquid storage, loading/unloading facilities,
and operations areas from unim pacted areas of the site.
R euse: C ollected rainw ater could be reused for agricultural purpos-
es if quality perm its or could be used for activities requiring
low er w ater quality such as w ashing or flare suppression.
R ecycle/ N /A
R ecover:
40
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
Treatm ent/ Surface disposal m ay be governed by contam ination. The
D isposal: provision of a site drainage system w ith an oil/solids
interceptor should be considered. A ny surface disposal
option should be capable of taking the drainage volum es
w ithout causing dam age by erosion or flooding, w hich
w ould not otherw ise occur.
D rainage w ater w ith a high organic content m ay be treated
in biological w ater treatm ent system s to rem ove organics
prior to discharge.
G Sanitary W aste
This covers all sew age and foul drainage. The im pact w ill be associated
w ith the B O D , C oliform bacteria and treatm ent chem icals.
Waste Management Options
R educe: Low flow and low w ater use toilets m ay be used.
R euse: N /A
R ecycle/ D igested sew age sludge m ay be used for agricultural/land
R ecover: im provem ent purposes.
Treatm ent/ Full treatm ent septic system s to process all sew age should
D isposal: be installed for all construction, drilling and production facili-
ties, and cam ps on land. C onsideration m ay be required for
m arine sew age system s for large offshore rig or platform
operations.
If chlorination is carried out, this should be strictly controlled
and oxygenation m ay be required to prevent dam age to
aquatic life.
41
A PPEN D IX 5
A PPEN D IX 6
This table sum m arises the w aste m inim isation options and possible treat-
m ent and disposal m ethods that m ay be applicable to a variety of w astes
typically found in E& P operations.
This list is not exhaustive, and the m inim isation, treatm ent and disposal
m ethods m ay vary according to available facilities, local conditions and
regulatory requirem ents. Indication in the table that m inim isation options
m ay exist does not necessarily m ean that a significant reduction in w aste
volum e can be reasonably achieved. Sim ilarly, indication that a treatm ent
or disposal option m ay be applicable does not necessarily m ean that it w ill
be appropriate or effective for specific w aste stream s or all environm ents.
C om binations of treatm ent and disposal m ethods m ay be required to
m eet m anagem ent objectives.
42
W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES
W aste M anagem ent O ptions
Sum m ary Table
Treatment and Disposal Methods
A = D eep W ell, B = Evaporation Ponds, C = Specialised W aste D isposal Facility, D = Incineration, E = Land Treatm ent,
F = Landfill, G = B iological Treatm ent, H = R oad A pplication, I = Solidification, J = B iorem ediation, K = Surface W ater
D ischarge (m ay require pretreatm ent)
Minimisation Options Treatment and Disposal Method
Waste Name Reduce Reuse Recycle A B C D E F G H I J K
A cid G G G G G G G
A ctivated C arbon G G G G G G
B atteries, Lead A cid, G G G
W et N IC A D
C atalysts G G G G G
C austic G G G G G G
C hem ical W aste G G G G G G G
C onstruction & D em olition G G G G G
M aterial
C ontainersD rum s/B arrels G G G G G G
C ontam inated D ebris G G G G G G
& SoilC hem icals
C ontam inated Soil G G G G G G G G
H ydrocarbon/Fuel
D essicant G G G G G G
D rilling Pit W aste G G G G G G G G G G G G
Filter B ackw ash Liquids G G G G G
Filters, C hem ical Treatm ent G G G G
43
A PPEN D IX 6
Minimisation Options Treatment and Disposal Method
Waste Name Reduce Reuse Recycle A B C D E F G H I J K
FiltersLube O il G G G G
FiltersO ther (R aw gas, G G G G
fuel, air)
FiltersW ater G G G
G arbageD om estic W aste G G G G G
H ydrotest Fluids G G G
Incinerator A sh G G G G G
Insulation G G G
Ion Exchange R esins G G G G
Ion Exchange R esin G G G G
R egenerant Liquids
Iron Sponge G G
Laboratory C hem icals G G G G G G
Lubricating O il G G G
H ydrocarbon
Lubricating O ilSynthetic G G
M olecular Sieve G G
Paint A ssociated W astes G G G G G G
PC B C ontam inated Solids G
& Liquids
Pigging W aste Liquids/W ax G G G
Process W aters G G G
Produced Sand G G G G G G G
Produced W ater G G G G G G G
R agsO ily G G G G G G
R ainw ater D rainage G G G G
Scrap M etal G G G G
Sludge, G lycol system s G G G G G
Sludge, G as Sw eetening G G G G G G
Sludge, Tank & Vessel G G G G G G G G G
B ottom s
Sludge, W ater Treatm ent G G G
Sanitary W astes G G G G
W ell W orkover Fluids G G G G G G

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi