WASTE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES Report No. 2.58/196 September 1993 E& P Forum Exploration & Production (E& P) W aste M anagem ent G uidelines R eport N o. 2.58/196 Septem ber 1993 E& P Forum , 2528 O ld B urlington Street, London W 1X 1LB Telephone: 44-(0)71-437 6291 Fax: 44-(0)71-434 3721 These guidelines have been prepared for the E & P Forum by their Environm ental Q uality C om m ittee through their W aste M anagem ent G uidelines Task Force. M s C . K. O w ens Exxon, C hairperson M r D . R . R ycroft Phillips M r M . T. Stephenson Texaco M r G . N orris A m erada H ess M r J. A . Johnson C onoco M r L. W . C ram e A m oco M r C . Inglesfield SIPM M r A . G rieg Shell Expro The O il Industry International Exploration and Production Forum (E& P Forum ) is the international association of oil com panies and petroleum industry organisations form ed in 1974. It w as established to represent its m em bersinterests at the International M aritim e O rganisation and other specialist agencies of the U nited N ations, governm ental and other international bodies concerned w ith regulating the exploration and production of oil and gas. W hile m aintaining this activity, the Forum now concerns itself w ith all aspects of E & P operations, w ith particular em phasis on safety of personnel and protection of the environm ent, and seeks to establish industry positions w ith regard to such m atters. A t present the Forum has 48 m em bers m ade up of 33 oil com panies and 15 national oil industry associations, operating in 52 different countries. The w ork of the Forum covers: G m onitoring the activities of relevant global and regional international organisations; G developing industry positions on issues; G advancing the positions on issues under consideration, draw ing on the collective expertise of its m em bers; and G dissem inating inform ation on good practice through the developm ent of industry guidelines, codes of practice, check lists etc. W hilst every effort has been m ade to ensure the accuracy of the inform ation contained in this publication, neither E& P Forum nor any of its m em bers w ill assum e liability for any use m ade thereof. D esign and layout: W ords and Publications, O xford A uthors The E& P Forum D isclaim er A cknow ledgm ents EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION (E&P) WASTE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION 2 Scope 2 B ackground 2 R esources Included in this D ocum ent 2 PRINCIPLES OF WASTE MANAGEMENT 4 W aste M anagem ent H ierarchy 4 A rea-Specific W aste M anagem ent Plans 6 AN OVERVIEW OF THE OIL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION PROCESS 8 Seism ic Identification of Potential H ydrocarbon R eserves 8 Exploratory D rilling 9 C onstruction 10 D evelopm ent and Production 10 M aintenance 10 D ecom m issioning and R eclam ation 11 WASTE MANAGEMENT METHODS 12 W aste M anagem ent M ethods 12 Source R eduction M ethods 12 R euse 13 R ecycling/R ecovery 13 Treatm ent 13 R esponsible D isposal 13 Surface D ischarge 14 Injection 14 B iotreatm ent M ethods 16 Landfarm ing 16 Landspreading 17 C om posting 18 B iological Treatm ent in Tanks 18 B iological Treatm entPackage U nits 19 Therm al Treatm ent M ethods 19 Incineration 19 C em ent KilnsFuel B lending 20 O pen B urning 20 Therm al D esorption System s 20 Solidification, Stabilisation and Encapsulation 21 Landfill 21 B urial 21 Pit M anagem ent 22 Solvent Extraction 22 APPENDICES 1. R eferences 24 2. G lossary of O il Industry Term s 26 3. W aste M anagem ent Planning W orksheet 30 4. Sum m ary of W astes G enerated by E& P A ctivities 32 5. Specific W aste Inform ation 35 6. W aste M anagem ent O ptionsSum m ary Tables 42 CONTENTS W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES Scope B ackground R esources Included in this D ocum ent IN TR O D U C TIO N These guidelines have been prepared for those oil and gas exploration and production (E& P) com panies w ho require inform ation on the range of w aste m anagem ent options available for w astes generated by their activi- ties. Sections of the docum ent provide: G a general description of w aste m anagem ent principles G an identification and overview of E& P activities and associated w astes, and G options for w aste reduction, recycling, treatm ent and responsible disposal. O perators should be able to use these guidelines to develop a w aste m an- agem ent program m e appropriate to their activities and to the ecological sensitivity of the operating location. H ow ever, not all m easures discussed in these guidelines w ill necessarily be appropriate for im plem entation in all geographic areas or under all conditions. E& P Forum guideline docum ents on operations w ithin rain forest, m angrove and arctic environm ents pro- vide additional inform ation and considerations for these specific areas. Specific requirem ents and standards for petroleum operators should be determ ined by agreem ent betw een the operating com pany and the authorities of a host country. Effective and responsible w aste handling and disposal are key elem ents of an organisations environm ental m anagem ent system . Exploration and Production (E& P) w aste as defined for this docum ent w ill be any m aterial, solid, liquid or m ixture that is surplus to requirem ents. There is increasing international concern that w astes be properly m anaged in order to m in- im ise their potential to cause harm to health or the environm ent. M oreover, efficient m anagem ent of w astes can reduce operating costs and potential liabilities. C haracteristics of concern include flam m ability, reactivity, corrosivity, longevity in the environm ent and hum an, anim al, or plant toxicity. This docum ent is designed as an inform ation source. It is not intended to replace an operators responsibility to ensure adequate and effective han- dling and disposal of generated w astes as required w ithin a host countrys regulatory requirem ents. D isposal options in som e areas m ay be restricted by lack of established w aste m anagem ent facilities and infrastructure. In these cases, the oil and gas operator m ay find it necessary to construct and m anage the nec- essary facilities. A lthough this approach m ay be expensive in the short term , it can often m inim ise long-term liabilities. In addition to the discussions on w aste m anagem ent options included in this docum ent, a num ber of appendices are provided to clarify or provide exam ples of som e topics presented in the text. These appendices are as follow s: G A ppendix 1 provides a list of references either used during preparation of this docum ent or providing supplem entary inform ation on various issues presented. G A ppendix 2 is a glossary of oil industry term s encountered in this docum ent. 2 G A ppendix 3 contains a form for creating an inventory of w astes generated during E& P activities. G A ppendix 4 provides tabulation of com m on types of w astes generated during E& P activities, the m ain sources of these w astes, constituents of these w astes that m ay adversely im pact the environm ent w hen present, and identification of the operations w hich m ay generate a specific w aste stream . G A ppendix 5 includes sum m ary sheets on a variety of com m on E& P w astes. These sheets discuss the characteristics of the w aste stream s and som e w aste m anagem ent options that m ay be appropriate. G A ppendix 6 provides a table of com m on types of w astes generated during E& P activities and a sum m ary of possible w aste m anagem ent options. 3 IN TR O D U C TIO N PR IN C IPLES O F W A STE M A N A G EM EN T The principles of w aste m anagem ent include the incorporation of a hierar- chy of w aste m anagem ent practices in the developm ent of w aste m an- agem ent plans. Specific w aste m anagem ent practices m ay be tailored to w aste and site characteristics as w ell as to availability of reuse, recycle, treatm ent and disposal facilities. C reating an inventory to identify and track w aste stream s, and record the costs associated w ith m anagem ent of those stream s, can help provide a baseline for identification of opportunities to im prove practices. A n accu- rate inventory of w aste m anagem ent practices recording the types of w astes, m ethods of treatm ent or disposal, and location of final disposal w ill not only be a valuable tool for w aste m inim isation program m es, but also be a source of data in the event of any question of liability for contam - ination, and site rem ediation. A ppendix 3 contains a sam ple w aste inven- tory sheet to aid in this process. Proper m anagem ent of w astes begins w ith pollution prevention. Pollution prevention refers to the elim ination, change or reduction of operating prac- tices w hich result in discharges to land, air or w ater. This principle should be incorporated into the design and m anagem ent of E& P facilities and the planning of associated activities. If elim ination of a w aste is not possible, then m inim ising the am ount of w aste generated should be investigated. R esponsible w aste m anagem ent m ay be accom plished through hierarchi- cal application of the practices of source reduction, reuse, recycling, recovery, treatm ent and responsible disposal. Elem ents of these practices are show n below : G Source Reductionthe generation of less w aste through m ore efficient practices such as: m aterial elim ination inventory control and m anagem ent m aterial substitution process m odification im proved housekeeping G Reusethe use of m aterials or products that are reusable in their original form such as chem ical containers oily w astes for road construction and stabilisation burning w aste oil for energy G Recycling/Recoverythe conversion of w astes into usable m aterials and/or extraction of energy or m aterials from w astes. Exam ples include: recycling scrap m etal recycling drilling m uds using cleaned drill cuttings for road construction m aterial recovering oil from tank bottom s and produced w ater G Treatmentthe destruction, detoxification and/or neutralisation of residues through processes such as: biological m ethodscom posting, tank based degradation therm al m ethodsincineration, therm al desorption chem ical m ethodsneutralisation, stabilisation physical m ethodsfiltration, centrifugation 4 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES W aste M anagem ent H ierarchy G Responsible Disposaldepositing w astes on land or in w ater using m ethods appropriate for a given situation. D isposal m ethods include: landfilling burial surface discharge landspreading or landfarm ing underground injection The flow diagram show n in Figure 1 displays how these w aste m anage- m ent practices m ay be applied. Specific m ethodologies w hich apply these principles are presented in the section on W aste M anagem ent M ethods. The role of tem porary and perm anent storage of w astes in the m anage- m ent process is not addressed in Figure 1. The potential ecological sensitivity of the location of operations is key to the selection of an appropriate m anagem ent practice for a specific w aste. This m ay require inform ation on geology, hydrology, clim ate and biological com m unities. Environm ental Im pact A ssessm ent docum ents can be a useful resource. 5 PR IN C IPLES O F W A STE M A N A G EM EN T FIGURE 1: Key Waste Handling, Minimisation and Disposal Decisions INVENTORY CHARACTERISE SEGREGATE IS THERE A RESIDUE? DOES IT REQUIRE TREATMENT(S)? TREATMENT(S) STOP DISPOSAL Minimisation Examples REDUCE REUSE RECYCLE/ RECOVER G G G G G Process modification or design change Material elimination Inventory control and management Material substitution Improved housekeeping G G G Chemical containers Oily wastes for road spreading Cleaned drill cuttings for roadbed material or landfill cover G G G G G Recycle scrap metal Recycle paper Recycle drilling muds Burn waste lubricating oil for energy recovery Recover oil from tank bottoms, produced water and drilling muds No Yes Yes No A n area-specific w aste m anagem ent plan directly relates the choice of w aste handling and disposal options to the ecological sensitivities, regula- tory requirem ents and available facilities/infrastructure of the geographical area involved. The plan should be w ritten from the field perspective and provide specific guidance for handling each w aste stream . In developing such a plan, an E& P facility or com pany could follow the 10 general steps outlined below . G Step 1: Management Approval M anagem ent approval and support should be obtained. Key personnel or other resources and scheduling issues should be resolved such that m an- agem ent is aw are of the tim ing and scope of the plan. The overall goal(s) of the w aste m anagem ent plan should be established w ith m easurable objectives stated for each goal. G Step 2: Area Definition The w aste m anagem ent plan is area-specific and should include a descrip- tion of the geographical area and specific business activities addressed. The prim ary consideration in selecting an area is hom ogeneity from both an ecological and a regulatory standpoint. G Step 3: Waste Identification O perations personnel should identify all the w astes generated w ithin the area defined for each E & P activity (i.e., production, drilling, com pletion/w orkover, natural gas plants). A brief description for each w aste (sources, percent oil and/or saltw ater content and approxim ate vol- um e) w ill assist in further m anagem ent steps. A ppendix 3 contains an inventory form w hich m ay facilitate this effort. G Step 4: Regulatory Analysis R eview international, regional and host country law s and regulations to determ ine the types of w astes for w hich m anagem ent practices should be highlighted. W aste types for w hich the regulations do not adequately define m anagem ent requirem ents should then be identified. G Step 5: Waste Categorisation The physical, chem ical and toxicological properties of each w aste should be identified. This inform ation m ay be found via M aterial Safety D ata Sheets (M SD S), m anufacturers inform ation, process know ledge, historic inform ation or lab analyses. A system to categorise w aste stream s accord- ing to their health and environm ental hazards can then be developed. G Step 6: Evaluation of Waste Management and Disposal Options A list of the potential w aste m anagem ent option(s) for each w aste should be com piled using the section on W aste M anagem ent M ethods and A ppendices 5 and 6 as a guide, and available options should be identified. The acceptability of each option for the different ecological dom ains in the plan area can then be determ ined. Evaluation should include: environm ental considerations; location; engi- neering lim itations; regulatory restrictions; operating feasibility; eco- nom ics; potential long-term liability; etc. The list of the acceptable w aste 6 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES A rea-Specific W aste M anagem ent Plans m anagem ent options and the desirability of each should be review ed by appropriate operations personnel and m anagem ent. In the event that intractable w aste stream s (such as those containing poly- chlorinated biphenyls (PC B s) or radioactivity) are identified, the m anage- m ent m ethod of perm anent storage in specialised storage facilities m ay be the only available option for reducing environm ental risk. G Step 7: Waste Minimisation O pportunities for reduction or elim ination of w aste, volum e or toxicity reduction, recycling and reclaim ing, or treatm ent should be review ed w hen evaluating m anagem ent options. W hen a potential w aste m inim isa- tion practice is identified, a pilot test m ay be desired for evaluation. R evision of the w aste m anagem ent plan should be m ade to reflect any m inim isation practices im plem ented. G Step 8: Selection of Preferred Waste Management Practice(s) From the evaluation of w aste m anagem ent and disposal options, selec- tion of the best practice for that operation and location can be m ade. A life-cycle analysis assessing the risks associated w ith storage, treatm ent, transport and disposal of a particular w aste stream m ay provide additional insight into w hich m anagem ent practices should be given preferred sta- tus. Through these processes, operations personnel m ay justify several of the current w aste m anagem ent practices and/or identify new or m odi- fied practices. G Step 9: Implementation of an Area Waste Management Plan C om pile all the preferred w aste m anagem ent and disposal options for each w aste found in a given operating area into one com prehensive, area- specific w aste m anagem ent plan. The recom m ended w aste m anagem ent practices should be sum m arised in concise docum ents for use at the field level. D escriptions should include only the w astes generated by the operations in the specific area or w ithin an operators responsibility. Each w aste description should indicate the chosen w aste m anagem ent and disposal practice. G Step 10: Plan Review and Update Effective w aste m anagem ent is an ongoing process. The plan should be review ed w henever new w aste m anagem ent practices or options are identified. A procedure to review and update the w aste m anagem ent plan should be established, and practices m odified to reflect changing tech- nologies, needs, or regulations. A rea w aste m anagem ent planning, im plem entation and review offers reassurance w ith regard to : G protection of the environm ent and ongoing com pliance w ith regulatory requirem ents G ongoing training of field personnel G appropriateness of the plan itself, and G m inim isation of the volum e and toxicity of the w astes The w aste m anagem ent plan should be a living evergreendocum ent w hich requires periodic review and revision. 7 PR IN C IPLES O F W A STE M A N A G EM EN T A N O VERVIEW O F TH E O IL A N D G A S EXPLO R ATIO N A N D PR O D U C TIO N PR O C ESS In order to appreciate the potential im pacts of oil and gas developm ent upon the environm ent, one m ust understand the activities involved. This chapter briefly describes the oil and gas exploration and production pro- cess. The guidance in this docum ent addresses only the w aste m anage- m ent aspects of these activities. In order to fully understand the range of environm ental im pacts associated w ith these activities, reference should be m ade to other guidelines and docum ents listed in A ppendix 1. In the follow ing discussions, com m on w astes are listed for each activity. A m ore detailed listing of w astes associated w ith various E& P activities is provided in A ppendix 4. In the first stage of the search for hydrocarbon-bearing rock form ations, geological m aps are review ed to identify m ajor sedim entary basins. A erial photography m ay be used to identify prom ising landscape form ations such as faults or anticlines. M ore detailed inform ation is then assem bled using a field geological assessm ent, follow ed by one or m ore of three m ain survey m ethods: m agnetic, gravim etric and seism ic. O f these a seism ic survey is the m ost com m on and is often the first field activity undertaken. Description Seism ic surveys require the generation of acoustic w aves at specified points along a relatively straight survey line. The acoustic w aves are reflected by changes in the subsurface geological strata. The reflections are detected by m any sensors arranged along several kilom etres of the survey line (over several square kilom etres in the case of a 3D survey) and recorded. Line preparation m ay involve cutting vegetation prior to survey- ing the data point and sensor locations. A s recording progresses along the survey line onshore, the sensors are m oved to new positions along the survey line by crew s using vehicles or helicopters. The data are processed by com puter to m ap the underlying strata and help define the size and shape of any geologic structure w orthy of further investigation. Several m ethods are available to generate the acoustic w aves; these include the use of shot holes, Vibroseis techniques, or air or w ater guns. The shot hole m ethod involves the detonation of sm all explosive charges placed in sm all diam eter holes drilled to a depth generally ranging from one to thirty m etres. In the Vibroseis m ethod, a group of three to five heavy vehicles (vibrators) low er and then vibrate a heavy pad at specific points on the surface. A ir or w ater guns create the acoustic w aves used for the survey by releasing com pressed air or w ater to create loud sonic vibrations. B ecause land seism ic activities are highly m obile, base cam ps are tem po- rary in nature. In order to protect surface w ater bodies, sanitary pits and biodegradable garbage pits should be at least 100 m etres from the w ater, if possible. N on-biodegradable, flam m able w astes m ay be burned and the ashes buried w ith the non-flam m able w astes. This burial should be at least one m etre deep. If the area w ater table is high, burial criteria should be reconsidered. 8 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES Seism ic Identification of Potential H ydrocarbon R eserves C om m on W astes The prim ary w astes from seism ic operations include dom estic w aste, sew age, explosive w astes, lines, cables and vehicle (including ship) m ain- tenance w astes. O nce a prom ising geological structure has been identified, the only w ay to confirm the presence of hydrocarbons and the thickness and internal pres- sure of a reservoir is to drill exploratory boreholes (w ells). The location of a drill site is dependent upon the characteristics of the underlying geological form ations. M odern drilling techniques allow som e flexibility in choice of location, allow ing consideration of both environm en- tal protection and logistical needs, w hile still reaching reservoir develop- m ent objectives. Description A site is constructed to accom m odate drilling operations and support ser- vices. O ffshore, a drilling barge, sem i-subm ersible drilling rig or a drilling ship is used to provide all of the functions associated w ith drilling the w ell. O n land, a typical one-hole exploration site occupies betw een 5000 and 20,000 square m etres. The type of site construction is dependent on sea- sonal constraints and geography. D rilling rigs and support equipm ent are norm ally divided into m odules to facilitate transportation. D epending on access roads, site location and m odule size and w eight, drilling rigs m ay be m oved by land, air or w ater transportation. O nce on site, the rig and a self-contained support cam p are assem bled. Typical m odules include a derrick, drilling m ud handling equipm ent, pow er generators and cem enting equipm ent. The cam p provides w orkforce accom m odation, canteen facilities, com m unications, vehicle m aintenance and parking areas, a helipad (for rem ote sites), fuel handling and storage areas, and provision for collection, treatm ent and disposal of w astes. O nce drilling com m ences, drilling fluid or m ud is continuously circulated dow n the drill pipe and back to the surface equipm ent to balance under- ground hydrostatic pressure, cool and lubricate the bit and flush out rock cuttings. The risk of uncontrolled flow from the reservoir to the surface is further reduced by using blow out preventers, a series of hydraulically actu- ated steel ram s that can close around the drill string or casing to quickly seal off a w ell. Steel casing is run into com pleted sections of the borehole and cem ented into place. The casing and cem ent provide structural sup- port to m aintain the integrity of the borehole, isolate underground form a- tions, and protect usable underground sources of w ater. W here a hydro- carbon form ation is found, initial w ell tests are conducted to establish flow rates, form ation pressure, and the physical and chem ical characteristics of the oil and gas. C om m on W astes The prim ary w astes from exploratory drilling operations include drilling m uds and cuttings; cem enting w astes; w ell com pletion, w orkover and stim ulation fluids; and production testing w astes. O ther w astes include excess drilling chem icals and containers, construction m aterials (pallets, w ood, etc.), process w ater, fuel storage containers, pow er unit and trans- port m aintenance w astes, scrap m etal and dom estic and sew age w astes. 9 A N O VER VIEW O F TH E O IL A N D G A S EXPLO R A TIO N A N D PR O D U C TIO N PR O C ESS Exploratory D rilling C onstruction of som e infrastructure and facilities w ill be required to sup- port activities. Description C onstruction of facilities such as roads, cam ps, canals and pipelines m ay be required both before and during the developm ent and production pro- cess. The construction process m ay use a w ide variety of m aterials, equipm ent and m ethods. The facilities required for a specific activity w ill depend on the activity and its geographic location. C om m on W astes The prim ary w astes from construction activities include excess construc- tion m aterials, used lubricating oils, paints, solvents, sew age and dom es- tic w astes. D evelopm ent and production operations are conducted to extract the oil and gas from the reservoir. Description A sm all reservoir m ay be developed using one or m ore of the exploratory w ells. Further developm ent of the reservoir m ay require additional w ells. A production facility m ay be required to separate, store and transport pro- duced fluids. The size and type of the installations needed for storing, sep- arating and transporting oil, gas and w ater w ill depend on the nature and location of the reservoir, the volum e and nature of produced fluids and the export option selected. These options include transport by road, w ater- w ay, pipeline or som e com bination of these. R outine operations on a producing w ell include m onitoring, safety and security inspections and periodic dow nhole servicing using a w ire line unit or a w orkover rig. In som e areas, a self-contained base cam p m ay be established to support routine operations. The base cam p provides w ork- force accom m odation, com m unications, vehicle m aintenance and parking, fuel handling and storage, and provision for collection, treatm ent and dis- posal of w astes. The operator w ill be able to extract only a portion of the oil present using natural pressure and sim ple pum ping. A range of enhanced recovery m ethods, including w aterflood, gas injection and m ethods em ploying chem icals, gases or heat m ay be used to increase the efficiency of oil pro- duction. C om m on W astes In addition to the w astes listed under Exploratory D rilling, C onstruction and M aintenance, the m ain w astes from developm ent and production operations include discharged produced w ater, flare and vent gas, produc- tion chem icals, w orkover w astes (e.g. brines) and tank or pit bottom s. M aintenance of vehicles, m echanical equipm ent and infrastructure m ay be required for operations of extended duration. Description M aintenance activities are com m on to all phases of the exploration and production process. D uring seism ic and construction activities, m ainte- nance is essentially lim ited to vehicle repair and inspection. Exploratory drilling m aintenance activities include vehicle and drilling rig repair and 10 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES C onstruction D evelopm ent and Production M aintenance inspection. M aintenance activities during developm ent and production include repair and inspection of vehicles, generators, drilling rigs, w orkover rigs, fluid process equipm ent and infrastructure. C om m on W astes The prim ary w astes associated w ith m aintenance activities include batter- ies, used lubricants, filters, hoses, tyres, paints, solvents, contam inated soil, coolant and antifreeze chem icals, used parts and scrap m etals. O il and gas installations are decom m issioned at the end of their com m er- cial life. Description D ecom m issioning generally involves perm anently plugging and abandon- ing all w ells, and m ay include rem oval of buildings and equipm ent, transfer of buildings and roads to local com m unities or host governm ent entities, im plem entation of m easures to encourage site re-vegetation and site m onitoring. C om m on W astes The prim ary w astes from decom m issioning and reclam ation include con- struction m aterials, insulating m aterials, plant equipm ent, sludges and con- tam inated soil. 11 D ecom m issioning and R eclam ation A N O VER VIEW O F TH E O IL A N D G A S EXPLO R A TIO N A N D PR O D U C TIO N PR O C ESS W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S A s in any aspect of environm ental m anagem ent, there are som e general 4 good practices that should be em ployed. These good practices not only protect health and the environm ent but also help protect E& P operators from potential long-term liabilities associated w ith w aste disposal. W aste m anagem ent m ethods should be selected based upon the hierarchy pre- sented on page 4. Som e of the treatm ent and disposal m ethods that m ay be used for E& P w astes are described on page 14 onw ards. The om ission of a particular m anagem ent option from the list discussed here is not m eant to im ply that it can not be effective. C ertainly, as research on w aste m anagem ent progresses, additional options w ill be identified. A n im portant aspect of a w aste m anagem ent program m e is the need to segregate w aste m aterials according to their general physical and chem i- cal characteristics. A part from safety concerns, an initial w aste characteri- sation w ill help determ ine w hich w aste stream s are sim ilar and m ay be com bined to sim plify storage, treatm ent, recycling, and/or disposal, and w hich stream s should rem ain segregated. Failure to recognise the need for w aste segregation m ay result in the creation of a w aste m ixture incom patible w ith the desired recycling or disposal option and result in the need for extensive lab analysis and higher w aste disposal costs. Source Reduction Methods Source reduction m eans elim inating or decreasing, to the extent practical, the volum e or relative toxicity of w astes generated by using alternate m aterials, processes or procedures. Volum eO pportunities to achieve significant w aste volum e reductions for som e E& P w astes are lim ited because their volum es are prim arily a func- tion of activity level and age or state of reservoir depletion. For exam ple, the proportion of discharged produced w ater typically increases as the reservoir is depleted. A lso, the volum e of drilling m uds generated is gen- erally a function of the num ber of w ells drilled and their depth. N evertheless, opportunities exist for source reduction and efforts should be m ade to exploit them . For exam ple, use of proper solids control equip- m ent can reduce the volum e of m ud discharged. Process m odification m ay be possible through m ore effective use of m echanical com ponents, such as m ore effective drill bits, rather than chem ical additions. G ravel packs and screens m ay significantly reduce the volum e of form ation solids/sludge produced. Im proved controls w ill help m inim ise m ud changes, engine oil changes and solvent usage. ToxicitySubstitution of products that result in the generation of less toxic w astes should be investigated. For exam ple, biocides, corrosion inhibitors, coagulants, cleaners, solvents, dispersants, em ulsion breakers, scale inhibitors, viscosifiers and w eighting agents should be selected w ith potential environm ental im pacts and disposal needs in m ind. Som e exam - ples are the selection of m ud and additives that do not contain significant levels of biologically available heavy m etals or toxic com pounds, and the use of m ineral oils in place of diesel oil for stuck drill pipe. O ther efforts should include: efficient planning so that all com m ercial chem ical products are used on the site or returned unused to vendors; 12 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES W aste M anagem ent M ethods consideration of bulk chem ical purchases to elim inate drum s; and use of drains and sum ps to collect and segregate spills. Reuse A fter all w aste reduction options have been considered, the next step is to evaluate reuse of the w aste m aterial. The reuse m ay be in the sam e, alter- native, or dow ngraded service, or the return of unused m aterials for re- issue or reuse in other industries. Exam ples include: use of drill cutting w aste for brick m anufacture and roadbed m aterial, use of vent gas for fuel, use of produced w ater or process w ater as w ash w ater, and return of oil based drilling m ud to the vendor for reprocessing and re-issue. W astes such as tank bottom s, em ulsions, heavy hydrocarbons, and hydro- carbon bearing soil m ay be used for road oil, road m ix, or asphalt. These w astes should be analysed to ensure they are not flam m able and have a m ixed density and m etals content consistent w ith road oils or m ixes. A pplication of hydrocarbon w astes to roads should be at loading rates that m inim ise the possibility of surface run-off. Recycling/Recovery A fter all w aste reduction and reuse options have been considered, the next step is to evaluate recycling and recovery of the w aste m aterial either in-process, on-site, or w ith outside contractors. W hen available, the recy- cling of drilling m uds in m ud plants should be considered. There are potential benefits in the sale of recovered hydrocarbons. A ll hydrocarbon w astes should be returned to the production stream w here possible. R ecovery of hydrocarbons from tank bottom s and separator sludges via centrifuging or filtering can be accom plished at on-site produc- tion facilities or off-site com m ercial facilities. W hen recycling scrap m etal, m onitoring should be considered to ensure that m etal w ith N O R M (LSA ) scale is not sent to the recycling facility along w ith uncontam inated m aterials. Treatment A fter source reduction, reuse, recycling and recovery opportunities have been exam ined, potential treatm ent steps to m inim ise w aste volum es or toxicity should be considered. Treatm ent m ethods include: biological m ethods (e.g. landspreading, com - posting, tank based reactors), therm al m ethods (e.g. therm al desorption and detoxification), chem ical m ethods (e.g. precipitation, extraction, neu- tralisation) and physical m ethods (e.g. gravity separation, filtration, centrifu- gation). Exam ples of treatm ent m ethods include: biodegradation of oily w astes in a pit by tillage and addition of nutrients (fertilizer); and stabilisation of m ud pit w astes by adjusting the pH to chem ically stabilise and reduce potential toxicity and m obility of inorganic com pounds. Responsible Disposal Finally, after all practical source reduction, reuse, recycling, recovery and treatm ent options have been considered and incorporated, responsible dis- posal options for the residue should be determ ined. The follow ing criteria should be exam ined w hen evaluating w aste disposal options. This inform a- tion w ill help in determ ining the long-term fate of a w aste and its con- stituents and should be applied to both on-site and off-site disposal facilities. 13 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S G eneral A rea O verview R eview the relevant law s and regulations of the area and the availability of off-site disposal facilities. G eneral Site O verview R eview the area-w ide topographical and geologi- cal features. A lso, review current and likely future activities around the dis- posal site. H ydrological EvaluationR eview hydrogeologic data to identify the loca- tion, size and direction of flow for existing surface w ater bodies and aquifers characterised as fresh or usable. A rea R ainfall or N et Precipitation C onditionsO btain historical rainfall dis- tribution data to establish m oisture requirem ents for landspreading, deter- m ine how quickly reserve pits w ill dry, predict net evaporation rates, eval- uate pit overflow potential, etc. Soil C onditions and Loading C onsiderationsD eterm ine soil conditions prior to m aking decisions on loading for landspreading and w hether or not pits w ill require liners. For exam ple, in high clay content and perm afrost areas, liners m ay not be necessary for reserve pits. In other areas w ith sandy soils and shallow usable groundw ater, liners or even tanks m ay be m ore appropriate. D rainage A reasD eterm ine natural or existing drainage patterns and iden- tify drainage devices needed to control w ater flow into, onto, or from facil- ity system s. Environm ental SensitivityC onduct a site evaluation to identify environ- m entally-sensitive features such as w etlands, urban areas, historical or archaeological sites, protected habitats, or presence of endangered species. A ir Q ualityG ive consideration to potential air quality im pact of w aste m anagem ent facilities. Surface discharge is one disposal option for aqueous w aste stream s. Factors to consider include the sensitivity and capacity of the potential receiving environm ent, the concentration of potentially harm ful com po- nents in the w aste and the volum e of the discharge stream . The capacity of the receiving environm ent to naturally absorb pollutants is a function of the dilution potential and volum e of the receiving w ater body. In this regard, the discharge of a high volum e, saline w aste stream into a sm all creek m ay not be appropriate w hile discharge of the sam e w aste stream into a large w ater body m ay be acceptable. Injection refers to the pum ping of w aste fluids or slurries dow n a w ell into suitable underground form ations for disposal. Injection m ay refer to the one tim e pum ping of w astes dow n an annulus or to specially m onitored w ells w hich m ay receive fluids for m any years. D isposal w ells are designed to provide an avenue, or w ellbore, to transport liquids into under- ground reservoirs in a m anner that w ill not adversely affect the environ- m ent. The target form ation for disposal should be geologically and m echanically isolated from usable sources of w ater. This form ation w ill not contain com m ercial quantities of oil and gas. M any liquid w astes m ay be m anaged using an injection w ell. The highest volum e fluid that m ay be handled by E& P disposal injection w ells is pro- 14 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES Surface D ischarge Injection duced w ater. O ther w astes suitable for injection m ay include: process w ater, blow dow n liquids, cooling w ater, dehydration and sw eetening w aste liquids and w aste drilling fluids. A s a m anagem ent practice, injection (other than annular injection) is an expensive process requiring extensive planning and control. In m ost cases, an injection w ell and system w ill require considerable E& P activity in a particular area to justify the investm ent in drilling a w ell or converting an existing producing w ellbore to injection service. O ther considerations include: G The injection volum e requiredthe volum es of produced w ater and other liquid or solid w astes to be injected should be determ ined. This w ill indicate the num ber of w ells to be drilled and connected to the injection system . G The nature of the form ationthe form ation to receive the w aste should have sufficient perm eability, porosity, thickness and areal extent, and low reservoir pressure in order to handle the forecast volum e and injection rate on a long-term basis. The geology of som e areas m ay be unsuitable for injection due to the presence of extensive geological faults resulting in reservoirs sm all in areal extent, form ations that seal poorly around a w ell, form ations that tend to fracture to the surface, or form ations w ith insufficient perm eability or close proxim ity to aquifers. G The m echanism for transportation of the w aste to the injection w ella gathering system and pum ping facilities m ay be necessary or the transport could be via tank truck or other m eans. G Pre-treatm ent(s) necessary before injectiontreatm ents necessary before injecting produced w ater into a salt w ater disposal w ell m ay include oil rem oval, coagulation and sedim entation to rem ove suspended solids, filtration, aeration, oxygen exclusion and rem oval, and bacteria and m ineral scale treatm ent. Solid w astes m ay have to be ground and slurried prior to annular injection. Annular Injection A nnular injection is a disposal m ethod w here pum pable w astes (usually reserve pit fluids) are injected into the surface casing or production casing annulus (or other casing or casing annulus). This practice should be m an- aged so that the w astes do not enter underground sources of w ater. A nnular injection is usually a one-tim eoption and is not suitable for con- tinuous disposal. The reasons for this include the m echanical inability to clean the disposal zone of accum ulated debris and the threat of corrosion of the production casing string and the interior of the surface pipe or other casing. If the surface pipe is breached by corrosion during long term injec- tion service, the injected fluids m ay enter usable w ater sources. Downhole Injection D ow nhole disposal of w aste m uds and cuttings, both oil and w ater based, from both onshore and offshore w ells m ay be suitable. The principle and practice is the sam e as for annular injection, described above, except that the liquid or slurried m ud w aste is pum ped dow nhole. D ue to the large particle sizes, drill cuttings cannot be injected dow nhole directly as they w ill quickly plug the receiving form ation. The cuttings m ust be broken up into sm all particles and slurried w ith m ud or w ater before they can be injected. System s typically include a grindingm achine, pum ps, recirculat- ing lines, tanks and shakers or desanders to rem ove large solids. 15 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S M any organic com pounds present in E& P w astes m ay be biodegraded to carbon dioxide and w ater using natural biological processes. H ow ever, natural biodegradation of contam inants tends to be rate lim ited due to lim - itations on the biological processes. These lim itations m ay be overcom e by optim ising the biological conditions. The m ost im portant factors for control of biological degradation of hydrocarbons are: G an adequate supply of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria G availability of sufficient oxygen (and m ixing) for cell m etabolism G availability and balance of nutrients and m icro-nutrients necessary for optim um bacterial m etabolism G m oisture control G tem perature and pH G salinity The concentration and type of com pounds to be degraded m ay have a sig- nificant im pact on the biodegradation process. Som e com pounds m ay be readily degraded at low concentrations but inhibit degradation at higher concentrations (for exam ple, som e hydrocarbon com pounds m ay be toxic to degrading organism s at high concentrations). O ther com pounds m ay be degraded very slow ly by biological processes, require an acclim atisation period or require co-m etabolites for degradation. In general, the com posi- tion of an organic w aste should be exam ined to determ ine the feasibility of reaching desired treatm ent levels. H igh levels of asphaltenes and/or polynuclear arom atic hydrocarbons (PA H ) in a w aste m ay m ake biological treatm ent an unlikely option for rapid rem oval of the hydrocarbon fraction. C onversely, high concentrations of alkanes in a w aste w ould m ake it a good candidate for biological treatm ent. In general, the biodegradability of petroleum hydrocarbon fractions follow s the relationship: saturates > aro- m atics > polars > asphaltenes. H ydrocarbon degrading m icrobes are ubiquitous in the environm ent. H ow ever, they m ay be present in very low concentrations in som e w aste stream s, environm ents exposed to extrem e conditions, or m aterials con- tam inated by extrem ely high concentrations of certain com pounds. If m icrobial populations are low in a w aste, native soils m ay often provide the m icrobial inocula necessary for biodegradation (as described in the land- farm ing, landspreading and com posting sections below ). If for som e reason soil m icrobes are inadequate or the w aste conditions are particularly harsh, strains of bacteria adapted to m etabolise hydrocarbons under the desired conditions m ay be added. W aste biological sludges from refinery w aste w ater treatm ent system s, if available, are an excellent source of hydrocar- bon degrading bacteria. O f the biological treatm ents described below , landfarm ing and landspread- ing m ay be considered disposal options as w ell as treatm ent. C om posting processes and bioreactors generally convert the w aste into a less harm ful product for subsequent use or disposal. R ates of biodegradation are high- est for bioreactors and com posting, and low est for the less favourable bio- logical conditions generally found in landfarm ing and landspreading. Landfarming Landfarm ing system s have been used for the treatm ent of oily petroleum industry w astes for m any years. The landfarm ing process involves the controlled and repeated application of w aste on a soil surface in order to biodegrade hydrocarbon constituents by using m icroorganism s naturally present in the soil. The landfarm ing area is periodically tilled to provide the necessary m ixing and oxygen transfer. A ctive landfarm ing m ay include addition of w ater, nutrients and other m aterials to enhance the biodegra- 16 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES B iotreatm ent M ethods dation process in the w aste/soil m ixture, and to prevent the developm ent of conditions that m ight prom ote leaching and m obilisation of inorganic contam inants. The conditions under w hich degradation takes place are typically aerobic. Volatilisation and dilution are tw o other im portant m echa- nism s for reduction of degradation products in land applications of w aste. Landfarm ing should not be confused w ith landfilling or burial, in w hich the w aste is deposited in m an-m ade or natural excavations for an indefinite period of tim e. The conditions under w hich landfilled and buried w astes are stored are usually anaerobic, w hich typically results in m uch slow er degradation. C are should be taken to avoid landfarm ing of m aterial w hich contains sig- nificant levels of biologically available heavy m etals, persistent toxic com - pounds, or low specific activity (LSA ) scale. A t inappropriate loadings, these m ay accum ulate in the soil to a level that renders the land unfit for further use. A site m onitoring program m e is recom m ended to ensure such accum ulation is not occurring. C onsiderations for the application of landfarm ing should also include the site topography and hydrology, and the physical and chem ical com position of the w aste and resultant w aste/soil m ixture. W aste application rates should be controlled to m inim ise the possibility of run-off. W hen a facility is properly designed, operated, and m onitored, landfarm ing is usually a rel- atively cost-effective and sim ple technique. Landfarm s m ay require gov- ernm ent perm its or approval and, depending on soil conditions, m ay require a liner and/or groundw ater m onitoring w ells. M oisture control to m inim ise dust (particulates) m ay also be necessary during extended dry conditions. Landspreading The treatm ent processes involved in landspreading are sim ilar to those in landfarm ing. H ow ever, landspreading refers to the one-tim e application of liquid or solid w aste to a site. Landspreading m ay be an appropriate tech- nique to reduce the organic content of a w aste. A s in landfarm ing, inorgan- ic com pounds and m etals are not only diluted into the soil, but m ay be incorporated into the m atrix through chelation, exchange reactions, cova- lent bonding etc., or m ay becom e less soluble through oxidation, precipita- tion and pH effects. In landspreading as in landfarm ing, aerobic biodegradation of hydrocarbons m ay be enhanced by nutrient addition to the w aste/soil m ixture and by periodic tillage of the m ixture (to increase aeration). For E& P w astes, salts and hydrocarbons are m ost frequently the com ponents w hich lim it the application rate of a w aste on a site. H ydrocarbon concentrations m ay be m onitored after landspreading to m easure progress and determ ine w hether biodegradation processes should be enhanced. In general, there is little regulatory guidance concerning landspreading practices. This is prim arily due to the fact that landspreading sites only receive a single application of w aste. This practice reduces the potential for the accum ulation of w aste com ponents in the soil, as m ight be the case in landfarm ing sites that receive m ultiple applications of w astes. C onstruction of a containm ent system (liners) or m onitoring of leachates from the site is seldom required for landspreading sites. H ow ever, site topography and hydrology, and the physical and chem ical com position of the w aste and resultant w aste/soil m ixture, should still be assessed and w aste application rates controlled to m inim ise the possibility of run-off. 17 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S Landspreading is m ost effectively used as a disposal m ethod for drilling fluids and cuttings w ith low levels of hydrocarbons and salts, but it m ay also be useful for other E& P w astes w ith these sam e characteristics. C haracterisation of a w aste, and treatability studies can be used to deter- m ine w hether landspreading m ay be effectively im plem ented. Composting C om posting is a solid phase biological treatm ent technique sim ilar to land treatm ent. B iodegradation rates are enhanced by im proving porosity, aera- tion, m oisture content, and operating tem perature. It m ay be possible for com post m ixtures w ith up to ten percent hydrocarbon to be reduced to less than one percent in four to eight w eeks. C haracteristics of com posting are: G W aste is m ixed w ith bulking agents (e.g. w ood chips, straw , rice hulls or husks) to provide increased porosity and aeration potential. C are should be taken to ensure the bulking agent provides sufficient porosity to allow aeration even at high m oisture levels. G M anure or agricultural w astes m ay be added to increase the w ater holding capacity of the w aste/m edia m ixture and to provide trace nutrients. G N itrogen and phosphorous based fertilisers, as w ell as trace m inerals (e.g. Fe, C u, M o, M n, Zn, B , C o, N i) m ay be added to enhance m icrobial activity. G M ixtures of the w aste, soil (to provide indigenous bacteria) and other additives, m ay be placed in piles sm all enough (less than 3 feet deep) to be tilled for aeration, or placed in containers or on platform s designed to allow forcing of air through the com posting m ixture. C om posting in closed containers allow s for control of volatiles. G The com post m ixture is m aintained near 4060 percent w ater by w eight to provide optim al m oisture conditions for biodegradation. G C om post system s are characterised by elevated tem peratures (3070 C ) w ithin the com post m ixture. The elevated tem perature increases m icrobial m etabolism , but should be closely m onitored to ensure tem peratures do not exceed 70 C (m ay cause cell death). Tem perature m ay be controlled by tilling the soil pile or by forced aeration. The degradation of organic com pounds using com posting techniques can be m uch m ore efficient than landspreading or landfarm ing techniques. In addition, treated w aste is contained w ithin the com posting facility and its properties m ay be readily m onitored. C om posted w astes that m eet health-based criteria m ay be reused as soil conditioners, landfill cover, clean fill, etc. Biological Treatment in Tanks The sam e aerobic biological reaction that occurs during landfarm ing or com posting processes m ay be accom plished at an accelerated rate using an open or closed vessel or im poundm ent. The process is typically operat- ed as a batch or sem i-continuous process. N utrients are added to a slurry of w ater and w aste, and oxygen (for aerobic degradation) is provided by air sparging and/or intensive m echanical m ixing of the reactor contents. The m echanical m ixing also provides a high degree of contact betw een m icroorganism s and the w aste com ponent to be biodegraded. A source of m icrobes capable of degrading the organic constituents of the w aste m ay also be required to accelerate start-up of the system . O perating conditions (tem perature, pH , oxygen transport and m ixing, and nutrient concentrations) m ay be easily m onitored and controlled in tank 18 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES based bioreactor system s. This control m akes optim isation of biological processes possible, hence ensuring the best rate of biodegradation. B ioreactors generally require less space than land-based biological treat- m ent processes. A disadvantage of bioreactors is that the m aintenance and capital investm ent required is high relative to other form s of biological treatm ent. A fter reaching the desired level of treatm ent, the disposal m ethod for residual reactor contents w ill be dictated by the concentrations of the rem aining com ponents. D epending on the constituents, liquids m ay be transported to w aste w ater treatm ent facilities, injected or discharged. A fter dew atering, solids m ay be buried, applied to soils, used as fill, or fur- ther treated to stabilise com ponents such as m etals. Biological TreatmentPackage Units A nother variation of the optim ised aerobic biological w aste treatm ent sys- tem is an activated sludge process com m ercially available in self-contained package units for the treatm ent of sanitary w astes. The system typically includes an aeration tank w ith an aerator system , a clarifier tank w ith sludge recycle and a chlorination system for the final effluent. The process is operated continuously w ith an influent loading rate set to the feeding rate of the m icroorganism s to allow the biodegradation of the organic con- stituents. Follow ing the m anufacturers recom m endations for operation is suggested. A lthough com m ercially available package units are highly efficient, they m ust be protected from biological upsets. C are m ust be taken to prevent the inadvertent dum ping of cleaning chem icals, solvents, used oils and strong acids, caustics or detergents to the sanitary sew er collection system . There are a variety of w aste treatm ent techniques based upon the applica- tion of heat to w aste m aterials. The resulting products from these tech- niques w ill depend on the am ount of heat em ployed. Low tem perature treatm ents m ay allow for recovery of hydrocarbons and w ater from w astes, w hereas the use of high tem perature technologies m ay destroy organic com pounds via com bustion. Incineration Incineration uses com bustion to convert w astes into less bulky m aterials. Incineration can refer to the practice of open burning of w astes in pits, although the degree of com bustion achieved in com m ercial incinerators w ill be difficult to achieve in open burning. This is because com m ercial incinerators can control the residence tim e, tem perature and turbulence w ithin the incineration cham ber to optim ise com bustion. These incinera- tors are often equipped w ith air pollution control devices to rem ove incom - plete com bustion products, rem ove particulate em issions, and reduce SO x and N O x em issions. There are m any types of incinerators, and m any air pollution control m echanism s. Incinerators are usually used to destroy organic w astes w hich pose high levels of risk to health and the environm ent. A s a rule, incineration of m ost E& P w astes is not necessary. H ow ever, if operations are located in a sen- sitive environm ent and other disposal options are not available, then incin- eration m ay be the best w ay to m anage oily w astes from E& P operations. B ecause of its durability and ability to incinerate alm ost any w aste, regard- less of particle size or com position, the type of incinerator best suited for 19 Therm al Treatm ent M ethods W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S m any E& P w astes is the rotary kiln. A rotating kiln tum bles the w aste to provide extensive contact w ith hot burner gases. D epending on the size and com plexity of an operation, sm aller incinerators can also be effective. D isposal of solids rem aining after incineration should be m anaged proper- ly. W hen organic com ponents of the w aste are incinerated, m etals con- centrations in the rem aining solids w ill increase. A n operator should ensure that incinerator ashes resulting from the treatm ent of its w astes are properly handled and disposed. Stabilisation m ay be required to pre- vent release of harm ful leachates into the environm ent. Cement KilnsFuels Blending The use of a cem ent kiln, w hen available, is usually an attractive and less expensive alternative to incineration of E& P oily w astes. O ily w aste m ay go into a fuel blending program m e to replace fuel otherw ise needed to fire the kiln. The retention tim e and tem perature (typically 1,400 to 1,500 C ) w ithin a cem ent kiln are adequate to achieve therm al destruction of organics. C em ent kilns m ay also have pollution control devices to m inim ise air em is- sions from the process. The ash from w astes com busted in the kiln w ill becom e incorporated into the cem ent m atrix. These ashes m ay provide a desirable source of alum inium , silica, clay and other m inerals that are typi- cally added in the cem ent raw m aterial feed stream . Open Burning O pen burning is typically used to dispose of cam p refuse, construction m aterial, and hydrocarbon containing m aterials w ith properties or in areas that m ake recycling, recovery, or transport unsuitable. W hen these condi- tions exist and regulations perm it burning, burning should be conducted in approved areas during daytim e hours and should not cause a nuisance. The possible effects of em issions of particulates and products of incom - plete com bustion should be considered, and com bustion m ethods that m inim ise em issions should be em ployed, w hen available. Thermal Desorption Systems A therm al desorption system is a non-oxidising process using heat to des- orb oil from oily w astes. M ost therm al system s burn fuel to provide heat to volatilise the oil, but there are som e system s that use electric or electro- m agnetic energy for heat. Therm al desorption system s are generally of tw o types: low tem perature system s and high tem perature system s. The w ork- ing tem perature of low -tem perature system s is usually 250 to 350 C , w hile high tem perature system s m ay em ploy tem peratures up to 520 C . Low tem perature system s m ay be sufficient to treat w astes w ith light oils. H igh tem perature system s w ill be able to achieve low er final oil contents for w astes containing heavier oils. Therm al desorption of w aste stream s w ill produce various secondary w aste stream s: solids, w ater condensate, oil condensate, and possibly an air stream from the condenser. Each of these stream s m ay require analysis to determ ine its characteristics so that the best recycle/disposal option can be chosen. This is im portant if the original w aste had high salts or m etals levels, or if there are no w astew ater treatm ent facilities on site, since addi- tional treatm ent m ay be required to reduce the potential for environm ental im pact from these stream s. In the case of air em issions, analysis m ay sug- gest the need for air control m easures to capture certain constituents. 20 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES Solidification, stabilisation and encapsulation are often discussed together as they m ay be jointly achieved by som e processes. In general, these pro- cesses produce dry solids (either as a m onolith or a dry granular solid sim i- lar to coarse soil). W astes treated by these technologies are stored and not destroyed. H ow ever, the concentrations or m obilities of constituents of concern in the treated w aste m ay be different from those in the original w aste. C em ent-based and pozzolanic (e.g. flyash) processes, as w ell as chem ical stabilisation processes, have been applied in the oil industry to solidify and/or stabilise w astes. These processes are especially effective for stabil- isation of m etals in the w astes because, at the high pH of the cem ent m ix- ture, m ost m etal com pounds are converted into non-biologically available insoluble m etal hydroxides. H ow ever, high concentrations of organic com - pounds, salts and bentonite have been show n to interfere w ith the curing process, and therefore lim it the application of this treatm ent technique. H ydrocarbons and salts do not interact w ith the cem ent m atrix and are physically rather than chem ically bound w ithin the m atrix. Landfills are generally specially constructed and m onitored facilities designed to accom m odate burial of large volum es of w astes. H ow ever, som e landfills m ay be little m ore than open dum ps. A landfill m ay be con- structed in a m anner that m akes it an appropriate disposal site for certain toxic w astes. A key consideration in the operation of a landfill site is the need to ensure long-term containm ent. D esign considerations for a landfill should, therefore, include: G A n im perm eable lining to contain the landfill contents. Liners m ay be constructed of clay, plastic sheeting and/or m ulti-layer linings w ith integrated drainage system s. G M onitoring boreholes or leachate collection system s to provide a m eans for regular inspection of the effectiveness of the containm ent. G Special provisions for disposal of liquid w astes, or prohibition of liquids disposal. If disposal of liquids is perm itted, the conditions should be controlled to prevent leaching. The landfill design should include arrangem ents for the collection and treatm ent of leachate. The operator should keep in m ind that all landfills m ay not be constructed to the sam e standards, and that industrial w astes should only be disposed of in sites w ith the proper design criteria and proper m onitoring and m ain- tenance program m es. Landfilled m aterials should not be capable of react- ing to generate excess heat or noxious gases. Special system s m ay need to be installed to collect generated m ethane. The operator should rem em - ber that landfilled w astes are not destroyed, but are actually in long-term storage. D isposal sites should be operated either by the w aste generator w ho w ill m aintain responsibility for its ow n w astes or by a properly m an- aged disposal facility. D ue to its sim plicity, burial of w astes in sm all pits at drilling and production sites has been a popular m eans of w aste disposal in the past. H ow ever, w ith current aw areness of pollutant m igration pathw ays, the risks associ- ated w ith burial of w astes should be carefully considered. In general, w astes w ith high oil, salt, or biologically available m etal content, industrial chem icals, and other m aterials w ith harm ful com ponents that could m igrate from the pit to contam inate usable w ater resources should not be buried. B urial m ay be the best m ethod of disposal for inert unrecyclable m aterials. If a pits contents contain concentrations of constituents only 21 Solidification, Stabilisation and Encapsulation Landfill B urial W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S slightly elevated above levels regulated for disposal, then burial provides a sim ple m echanism to reduce concentrations in the w aste, via dilution w ith soil, as it is being disposed. This m ay often be the case for w ater based m uds and cuttings. In dilution burial, the pit contents are m ixed w ith soils from the pit and surrounding areas until the pit contents m eet specifica- tions for burial, then the pit is covered and the surface graded. B urial is a logical choice for w astes that have been stabilised, since m igra- tion of the constituents of the w aste w ill be retarded by the stabilisation process. H ow ever, if there is a reason for extra caution at a particular site (either because of the constituents in the original w aste, or because of the hydrogeologic characteristics of the site) then additional barriers to m igra- tion such as barrier w alls around the pit, liners around the pit contents, or a cap to prevent vertical m igration, could also be installed. A lternatively, and if available, the w aste could be sent to a properly m anaged facility designed to handle that type of w aste. C onsideration of factors such as the depth to groundw ater, and the type of soil surrounding the pit should be m ade before w astes are buried. This ensures proper protection of soil and w ater resources. W hen burial and/or pit closure is com plete, the area should be graded to prevent w ater accum ulation, and revegetated w ith native species to reduce potential for erosion and prom ote full recovery of the areas ecosystem . The use of pits, earthen or lined, is an integral part of E& P w aste m anage- m ent operations. H istorically, on-site pits have been used for the m anage- m ent of drilling solids, evaporation and storage of produced w ater, m an- agem ent of w orkover/com pletion fluids and for em ergency containm ent of produced fluids. In general, pits should be as sm all as possible and be strategically located to prevent spillage of w aste m aterials onto the drilling or production site. Pits should be lined unless site characteristics ensure that there w ill be no significant threat to w ater resources. In areas w here it m ay be necessary to construct pits adjacent to w ater bodies or on sloping terrain, special engineering precautions should be taken to ensure the integrity of the pit. Free hydrocarbons should be rem oved from pits and returned to the pro- duction process for recovery as soon as possible, and precautions should be taken to prevent pit disposal of chem icals, refuse, debris or any other m aterials w hich w ere originally not intended to be placed in pits. These m aterials can alter the nature of the bulk fluids in the pit and m ake dispos- al m ore difficult. A lthough pits are an accepted com ponent of E& P operations, they could represent an environm ental liability if m anaged im properly. Pits should be for tem porary use, and should not be used for disposal of oil. Pits should be closed as soon as practicable and their closure should follow the required or generally accepted practices of the region. Solvent extraction uses solvents to extract oil from oily solids or sludges. Solvents used for extraction include carbon dioxide, propane, hexane, tri- ethylam ine, m ethylene chloride and certain proprietary solvent m ixtures. A n elaborate solvent recovery system is generally em ployed in order to reuse the solvent. 22 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES Pit M anagem ent Solvent Extraction A properly operated solvent extraction system w ill recover and recycle vir- tually all solvent used for extraction, and allow oil to be recovered. A closed loop system for the vapour phases generated should ensure that there are no direct air em issions from the process. Safety w ill be a consid- eration for system s w hich use high tem peratures, high pressures or volatile solvents. D isposal options for w astew ater separated from the solids, and the treat- ed solids, w ill depend on the constituents of the treated stream s. Extracted w ater m ay be injected or require treatm ent prior to discharge. Treated solids m ay be heat treated to rem ove residual solvents prior to disposal. Solids w ith significant biologically available m etal contents m ay be stabilised to prevent m igration after disposal. 23 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T M ETH O D S A PPEN D IX 1 A R eview of Solidification/Stabilisation Technology, W iles, C . C ., Journal of H azardous M aterials,14 (1987), 521. A n E valuation of O rganic M aterials that Interfere w ith Stabilisation/Solidification Processes, in Petroleum C ontam inated Soils, Volum e I, R em ediation Techniques, Environm ental Fate, R isk A ssessm ent. C ullinane, M . J., Jr. and B ricka, R . M ., (Kostecki, P. T. and C alabrese, E. J., eds.) Lew is Publishers, C helsea, M ichigan, 1989, 127136. A P I E nvironm ental G uidance D ocum ent: O nshore S olid W aste M anagem ent in Exploration and Production O perations, A PI docum ent 81110850, January 1989. C om bustion and Incineration Processes: A pplications in Environm ental Engineering, N iessen, W . R ., M arcel D ekker, Inc., N ew York, N ew York, 1978. C om posting of C hem ical Industrial W astes Prior to Land A pplication, in Land Treatm ent of H azardous W aste,W illson, G . B ., Sikora, L. J. and Parr, J. F., (Parr, J. F., M arsh, P. B . and Kla, J. M ., eds.), N oyes D ata C orp., Park R idge, N . J., 1983. C hem ical U sage in O ffshore O il and G as Production System s, H udgins, C . M ., R eport to A PI, 1989. E & P Forum G uidelines for the P lanning of D ow nhole Injection Program m es for O il B ased M ud W astes and A ssociated C uttings from O ffshore W ells,R eport N o. 2.56/187, O ctober 1993. E& P Forum O il Industry O perating G uideline for Tropical R ainforests, R eport N o. 2.49/170, A pril 1991. Exploration and Production Industry A ssociated W aste R eport,A PI docu- m ent 0300-004-008, M ay 1988. H andbook for Stabilisation/ Solidification of H azardous W astes,C ullinane, M . J., Jones, L. W . and M alone, P. G ., EPA /540/2-86/001, June 1986, (N TIS no. PB 87-116745). H andbook of H azardous W aste Incineration, B runner, C . R ., TA B Professional and R eference B ooks, B lue R idge Sum m it, Pennsylvania, 1989. O il and G as Exploration and Production O perations in M angrove A reas G uidelines for E nvironm ental P rotection, W orld C onservation U nion (IU C N )/E& P Forum joint publication, 1993, ISB N 2831701872, E& P Forum R eport N o. 2.54/184. O il and G as Industry Exploration and Production W astes, A PI docum ent 471-01-09, July 1987. O il and G as Exploration and Production in A rctic and Sub-A rctic O nshore R egionsG uidelines for Environm ental Protection, W orld C onservation U nion (IU C N )/E& P Forum joint publication, 1993, ISB N 2831701880, E& P Forum R eport N o. 2.55/185. 24 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES R eferences O ilfield Environm ental C ontrol Technology: A Synopsis. W ojtanow icz, A . K. Journal of Petroleum Technology,166173, February 1993. O nsite Treatm ent: H ydrocarbon C ontam inated S oil, W estern S tates Petroleum A ssociation, 1990. Production W aste M anagem ent H andbook for the A lberta Petroleum Industry,C anadian Petroleum A ssociation, D ecem ber 1990. S olid-W aste D isposal: D eep W ell Injection, S m ith, M . E ., C hem ical Engineering,A pril 9, 1979, 107112. The E ffect of V olatile O rganic C om pounds on the A bility of Solidification/Stabilisation Technologies to A ttenuate M obile Pollutants, Kyles, J. H ., M alinow ski, K. C ., Leithner, J. S. and Stanczyk, T. F., in P roceedings of the N ational C onference on H azardous W astes and H azardous M aterials,H M C R I (1987), 152157. 25 A PPEN D IX 1 A PPEN D IX 2 acidising The treatm ent of a w ell by injection w ith a solution of acid (hydrochloric, hydrofluoric, acetic, form ic, cit- ric) to m aintain or increase perm eability of a rock stratum by dissolving pore blockage due to fine parti- cles from the reservoir stratum , precipitated m ateri- als or corrosion products, so im proving productivity or injectivity (see injection) of a w ell. annulus The space surrounding a cylindrical object w ithin a cylinder; the space around a pipe in a w ellbore, the outer w all of w hich m ay be the w all of either the borehole or the casing, som etim es term ed the annular space. aquifers R ock strata w hich contain, and are perm eable to, w ater. The w ater m ay be fresh or saline, and either potable or non-potable. B TEX B enzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and ortho-, m eta-, and para-Xylene. biologically available A lso bio-available. Substances w hich are present in a form w hich can be taken up by plants or anim als and w hich m ay be incorporated into their tissues. biocides M aterials w hich can be added to m uds or reinjected produced w ater for the purpose of prevention or lim - itation of grow th of bacteria in the m ud or in the oil- reservoir rock. biodegradable Susceptible to breakdow n, into sim pleroften solu- ble and/or gaseouscom pounds, by m icroorgan- ism s in the soil, w ater and atm osphere. B iodegrad- ation often converts toxic organic com pounds into non- or less-toxic substances. B O D (biochem ical M easure of the quantity of dissolved oxygen oxygen dem and) (expressed in parts per m illion) used in the decom position of organic m atter by biochem ical action. brine Salt w ater. M ay be produced w ater or m ixed solutions m ost com m only containing sodium , potassium , or cal- cium chloride salts. W hen added to drilling m uds, brine has three functions: 1. m inim ise reaction betw een m ud and soluble salts in the strata being drilled; 2. increase m ud w eight; 3. increase m ud viscosity. C FC C hlorofluorocarbon. consolidation C hem ical m ixture pum ped dow n a w ell to stabilise m aterials the form ation structure or m inim ise w ater production. com pletion fluid C hem ical m ixture present in the w ell during the placem ent of production tubing and perforation of the w ell (m ay be a drilling fluid, or specialised brine). 26 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES G lossary of O il Industry Term s cuttings The fragm ents of rock dislodged by the drilling bit and brought to the surface in the drilling m ud. developm ent w ell W ell drilled in a form ation for the purpose of produc- ing oil and gas. A lso called a production w ell. drilling C hem icals used in the form ulation and m aintenance chem icals of drilling m uds. drilling fluids Specialised fluid m ade up of a m ixture of clays, w ater (and som etim es oil) and chem icals, w hich is pum ped dow n a w ell during drilling operations to cool and lubri- cate the system , rem ove cuttings and control pressure. drilling m uds See drilling fluids. drilling rig See rig. decom m issioning The act of taking an operating site out of service. This m ay include the final plugging of w ells and the rem oval of surface structures. descalers Substances added to prevent build-up of, and to a lesser extent rem ove, solids such as calcium carbon- ates and sulphates deposited on the drill pipe and casing. Pitting corrosion of m etal can occur under scale deposits. dow nhole D ow n a w ell or borehole. Environm ental A form al, w ritten, technical evaluation of potential Im pact effects on the environm ent (atm osphere, w ater, A ssessm ent land, plants and anim als) of a particular event or activity. effluents Liquid w aste m aterials discharged from operations. encapsulation The enclosure of w astes by a non-perm eable sub- stance. W aste constituents are not chem ically altered, but their transport w ill be im peded by the encapsulating m atrix. exploration The search for reservoirs of oil and gas, w hich includes aerial and geophysical surveys, geological studies, core testing and drilling of w ells. exploration D rilling carried out to determ ine w hether hydrocarbons drilling are present in a particular area or geological structure or to learn m ore about subsurface structures. fracturing The process of cracking open, by applying hydraulic pressure, the rock form ation around a w ell bore to increase productivity or injectivity. fracturing fluid H eavy, viscous fluid pum ped dow n a w ell under high pressure to fracture the target form ation in order to enhance fluid flow . 27 A PPEN D IX 2 flaring C ontrolled disposal of surplus com bustible vapours by igniting them in the atm osphere. gas processing The separation of constituents from natural gas for the purpose of m aking saleable products and also for im proving the quality of the natural gas. H C FC H ydrochlorofluorocarbon. H 2 S (hydrogen A pungent, corrosive, toxic gas occurring naturally in sulphide) som e oil and gas reservoirs (and elsew here), generated by the m etabolism of certain types of bacteria. hydrotest The checking of the integrity of a container (e.g. a tank or pipe) by filling it w ith w ater under pressure and testing for any loss of pressure. injection w ell A w ell used to inject gas or w ater into an oil/gas reservoir rock to m aintain reservoir pressure during the secondary recovery process. A lso a w ell used to inject treated w astes into selected form ations for disposal. M SD S/SD S M aterial Safety D ata Sheet used by chem ical suppli- ers to sum m arise properties of products, including health, safety and environm ental aspects. N O R M N aturally O ccurring R adioactive M aterials. Low Specific A ctivity (LSA ) scale is one exam ple of a N O R M w aste. PA H Polynuclear A rom atic H ydrocarbon. produced w ater W ater originating from the natural oil reservoir, that is separated from the oil and gas in the production facility. production That phase of petroleum operations that deals w ith bringing the reservoir fluids to the surface and sepa- rating them , and w ith storing, gauging, and other- w ise preparing the product for the pipeline. production C hem icals used to enhance or assist the production treating chem icals process or protect equipm ent. reclam ation The activities undertaken to restore a site to a prede- term ined land-use. recoverable That proportion of the oil/gas in a reservoir that can reserves be rem oved using currently available techniques. rig A collective term used to describe the equipm ent, including the vessel or structure on w hich the equip- m ent is installed, required to drill a w ell, the m ost visible com ponent being the m ast or derrick. 28 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES road oil O il used for dust control or road base stabilisation, generally spread on the road and incorporated by till- ing and com paction. scrubbing Purifying gas by treatm ent w ith a w ater or chem ical w ash. seism ic survey A survey conducted to m ap the depths and contours of rock strata by tim ing the reflections of sound w aves released from the surface or from dow n a borehole (shot hole). shot hole A borehole in w hich an explosive is placed for blast- ing in use as the energy source for seism ic survey. solidification The addition of m aterials (saw dust, adsorbent poly- m ers, etc.) to a w aste to change its physical state and im prove handling and w eight-bearing characteristics. stabilisation The chem ical conversion or encapsulation of w aste to create a com posite m atrix that resists leaching. stim ulation fluids C hem ical m ixture pum ped dow n a w ell to stim ulate or enhance the production of hydrocarbons from that w ell. vent gases Those gases w hich are released, unburnt to the atm osphere. Venting m ay be deliberate (for opera- tional reasons) or accidental. Vibroseis A com m ercial heavy, vehicle-m ounted, vibration sys- tem used onshore for the generation of shock (sound) w aves into the ground during seism ic surveys. VO C Volatile O rganic C om pounds. w ater injection The pum ping of w ater into the reservoir rock to m ain- tain the reservoir pressure. w ell com pletion The activities and m ethods used to prepare a w ell for the production of oil and gas. This m ay include estab- lishm ent of a flow line betw een reservoir and sur- face. w ell servicing The m aintenance w ork perform ed on an oil or gas w ell to im prove or m aintain the production from a form ation already producing. w ellbore The hole m ade by drilling or boring; m ay have a cas- ing in it or it m ay be open, or a portion m ay be cased. w orkover A process by w hich a com pleted production w ell is subsequently re-entered and any necessary cleaning, repair and m aintenance w ork done. 29 A PPEN D IX 2 A PPEN D IX 3 The follow ing form is an exam ple of a w orksheet w hich could be used w hen developing area w aste m anagem ent plans. C om pletion of such form s requires input from personnel w ho are fam iliar w ith both operational and technical aspects of E& P activities. To ensure consistency, proce- dures used to classify w astes should be defined before com pleting a w orksheet. These classifications should agree w ith any local regulatory agency definitions. The space for specifying the operation/equipm ent generating the w aste can be used to docum ent the incident or event causing w aste generation. Exam ples include periodic tank cleaning, spills and leaks. Exam ination of these records m ay then assist in identifying process or procedure m odifi- cations to reduce or elim inate w astes. C om pletion of other table item s is outlined in the legend below . To determ ine how you w ant to m anage your w aste, list the w astes you generate, their sources (e.g. operation or equipm ent), volum es (e.g. bbls, m 3 or tons), frequency of generation (e.g. per day, per w eek, per year), know n hazardous characteristics (e.g. pH < 2), and classification (degree of hazard). D escribe the current w aste disposal practices (e.g. onsite or off- site, disposal m ethod used and nam e of disposal facility). List all the alter- native w aste m anagem ent options (e.g. m inim isation, road and land spreading, burial, injection) and record any special constraints that affect your options. Taking everything into consideration, choose the preferred m anagem ent option. 30 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES W aste M anagem ent Planning W orksheet 3 1 A P P E N D I X
3 WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING WORKSHEET Constraints (Regulatory, Policy, Disposal, Site Availability, Cost etc.) Pref erred Management Option Waste Management Options Current Disposal Onsite/ Of f site Disposal Method Facility Name Waste Classif ication Waste Characteristics Frequency of Generation Waste Volume Operation/ Equipment Generating Waste Waste DATE: / / LOCATION: PERSON PREPARING WORKSHEET: A PPEN D IX 4 The follow ing table sum m arises the prim ary types of w aste stream s encountered during E& P operations. The m ain sources of these stream s are provided for clarification. The constituents that m ay be of environm en- tal concern are also sum m arised for each w aste. The inclusion of a con- stituent in this colum n does not necessarily indicate that the constituent is alw ays present, or that if the constituent is present that it w ill be of high enough concentration to w arrant concern. The last colum n of the table indicates w hich of the individual E& P activities m ay generate the indicated w aste stream . 32 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES Sum m ary of W astes G enerated by E& P A ctivities A = A bandonm ent C = C onstruction and C om m issioning D = D rilling M = M aintenance P = Production S = Seism ic WASTE STREAM MAIN SOURCES POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTALLY TYPE OF SIGNIFICANT CONSTITUENTS OPERATION A bsorbents Spill clean up H ydrocarbons, production chem icals, solvents A C D M P S A ir Em issions Vent gases N O x , SO x , H 2 S, C O x , VO C , D P Flare G ases hydrocarbons, carbon, particulates, B low dow n from bulk chem icals PA H 's, B TEX A ir Em issions Engine exhausts C O x , SO x , N O x , VO C , PA H s, A C D M P S form aldehyde, carbon particulates A ir Em issions Fugitive gases VO C , B TEX A C D M P B allast w ater Tankers w ith non-segregated H ydrocarbons P ballast B oiler/cooling tow er Steam generation facilities Scale inhibitors, biocides, corrosion inhibitors, D M blow dow n and cooling tow ers heavy m etals, solids C em ent C em ent slurries H eavy m etals, thinners, viscosifiers, pH , salts D P C em ent m ix w ater C em ent returns C onsolidation C arrier fluids H ydrocarbons P m aterials Epoxy resins Excess chem icals C ontam inated soil Spill/leaks H ydrocarbons, heavy m etals, salts, A C D M P S treating chem icals C ontam inated R ainw ater run-off Inorganic salts, heavy m etals, solids, A C D M P drainage w ater R ig w ash production chem icals, detergent, Process w ater hydrocarbons W ash w ater D ehydration and D ehydration processes A m ines, glycols, filter sludges, m etal sulphides, Sw eetening W astes Sw eetening processes H 2 S, m etals, benzene P 33 A PPEN D IX 4 WASTE STREAM MAIN SOURCES POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTALLY TYPE OF SIGNIFICANT CONSTITUENTS OPERATION D om estic sew age Living quarters B O D , solids, detergent, coliform bacteria A C D M P S D rilling fluid C hem ical containers B iocides, surfactants, salts, m etals, em ulsifiers, D P chem icals D rilling fluids viscosifiers, organics, pH D rill cuttings R ig w ash Fire fighting agents Fire protection H alons, C FC s, H C FC s, fire fighting foam s A C D M P equipm ent/facilities H ydrotest fluids Pipeline hydrotesting activities B O D , solids, biocides, corrosion inhibitors, C oxygen scavengers, dyes Incinerator ash Incinerators H eavy m etals, salts, ash A D P Industrial refuse C leaning m aterials H ydrocarbons, plastic A C M Insulation Industrial w aste B atteries A cid, alkali, heavy m etals, PC B s A C M Transform ers C apacitors M aintenance w astes Sandblast (grits) H eavy m etals, hydrocarbons, solids, solvents M G reases Fuel oils Filters M edical w aste D ressings Pathogenic organism s, plastic, glass, A C D M P C linical & cleaning m aterials m edicines, needles B lood sam ples M ercury Instrum entation M ercury A D M P O il/gas production Production testing O il based m uds D rilling operations H ydrocarbons, inorganic salts, heavy m etals, D & cuttings solids/cuttings, drilling fluid chem icals Paint m aterials Paints H eavy m etals, solvent, hydrocarbon C M Thinners C oatings Pigging sludges Pipeline cleaning operations Inorganic salts, heavy m etals, solids, P production chem icals, N O R M , hydrocarbons, phenols, arom atics Process w ater Engine cooling w ater H ydrocarbons, treatm ent chem icals A D M P S B rake cooling w ater W ash w ater A = A bandonm ent C = C onstruction and C om m issioning D = D rilling M = M aintenance P = Production S = Seism ic 34 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES WASTE STREAM MAIN SOURCES POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTALLY TYPE OF SIGNIFICANT CONSTITUENTS OPERATION Production chem icals C hem icals containers D em ulsifiers, corrosion inhibitors, w ax P Spent fluids inhibitors, scale inhibitors, defoam ers, oxygen Sludges scavengers, biocides, coagulants, flocculants. C ontam inated chem icals Produced w ater Production of oil and gas Inorganic salts, heavy m etals, solids, production D P chem icals, hydrocarbons, benzene, PA H s Produced sand D rilling/production operations H ydrocarbons, heavy m etals, N O R M P R efrigerants A ir conditioning/ C FC , H C FC A C M P refrigerant system s Scrap m etals A bandoned platform s H eavy m etals, N O R M scales A C M S U sed pipelines U sed process equipm ent U sed tanks Electrical cables Em pty drum s U sed tubulars U sed casing Spacers D rilling operations H ydrocarbon, alcohol, arom atics, D P detergents, surfactants Spent catalysts C atalyst beds H eavy m etals, hydrocarbons, inorganic salts M P M olecular sieve Spent com pletion Production w ell com pletion Inorganic salts,hydrocarbons, D P fluid activities corrosion inhibitors Spent stim ulation or Production w ell w orkover Inorganic acids (H C L, H F), hydrocarbons, D P fracturing fluids activities m ethanol, corrosion inhibitors, oxygen scavengers, form ation fluids, N O R M , gelling agents Tank & vessel Separation tank sedim ents Inorganic salts, heavy m etals, solids, P bottom w astes Storage tank sedim ents production chem icals, N O R M , W ater drain tank sedim ents hydrocarbons, PA H s W aste lubricants Equipm ent lube oil changes O rganics, heavy m etals D M S W ater based D rilling activities H igh pH , inorganic salts, hydrocarbons, D (include brine) solids/cuttings, drilling fluid chem icals, m uds & cuttings heavy m etals A = A bandonm ent C = C onstruction and C om m issioning D = D rilling M = M aintenance P = Production S = Seism ic 35 A PPEN D IX 5 A PPEN D IX 5 The follow ing pages contain descriptions of som e selected w aste stream s and discussion of possible w aste m anagem ent options for these w astes. These descriptions are not intended to be all-inclusive but give exam ples of potential options. G A tm ospheric Em issions This covers all pow er plant exhausts, flares, vents and gas leaks in drilling and oil and gas processing activities. This can include SO x , N O x , H 2 S, hydrocarbons, VO C s, particulates and PA H s. Waste Management Options R educe: D esign and operate oil and gas exploration and production activities and process equipm ent w ith controls and policies to m inim ise atm ospheric em issions. M aintain and run all pow er plants under optim al fuel effi- cient conditions, w hen possible. R euse: W here possible flare gas should be used as a fuel. N atural gas m ay also be injected for reservoir m aintenance, enhanced recovery or used in artificial lift. R ecycle/ E xploit w aste heat recovery opportunities w here R ecover: practically possible. Treatm ent/ Excess produced gas m ay be injected or flared. D isposal: C atalytic cham bers, scrubbers or strippers can be installed on exhaust stacks. W ater injection into fuel com bustion cham bers m ay reduce N O x em issions. G C hem ical W aste This includes any surplus or contam inated chem icals used at all stages of exploration and production activities. It includes specific item s such as bat- teries, transform ers and other item s containing or contam inated w ith chem ical products. The concerns w ill depend on the com position and the associated safety and adverse environm ental considerations. These w astes m ay require spe- cific segregation and disposal techniques. Waste Management Options R educe: W herever possible, planning and good housekeeping practices should be em ployed to m inim ise surplus and contam ination. Substitution w ith longer life products and those w ith low er im pacts should be considered. Specific W aste Inform ation 36 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES R euse: Surplus chem icals m ay be usable in other locations or returned to vendors, if possible. M aterials such as cem ent, bentonite, lim e, m ay have alter- nate use in w aste treatm ent, road construction, landfill site construction, etc. R ecycle/ Item s such as lead acid batteries, w et nickel/cadm ium R ecover: batteries should be sent to recycling facilities if available. C ertain chem ical w astes m ay contain m etals such as silver or m ercury w hich could be recovered. C hem ical solvents m ay be econom ically recovered or used in a fuel blending program m e. Treatm ent/ Encapsulation/solidification by m ixing w ith cem ent, lim e or D isposal: other binder m ay be appropriate prior to disposal. Special landfill sites m ay be available w hich can accept cer- tain kinds of chem ical w aste. The possibility of leachate problem s need to be identified. For som e organic chem ical w astes, incineration m ay be the preferred treatm ent option. For chem icals like PC B s, high tem perature incineration is required to destroy the com pounds. G C ontam inated Soil from O il/Fuel Spills This m ay include soil, beach or shore m aterials arising from the leakage or spill of hydrocarbons or fuels. The im pact w ill depend on the type of hydrocarbon and the location of the spill or leak. Waste Management Options R educe: A void spills and leakage by im proved housekeeping, m ain- tenance and transport procedures. R euse: N /A R ecycle/ D epending on the extent of the contam ination, recovery of R ecover: free liquids m ay be possible. Treatm ent/ Landfarm ing, landspreading and com posting m ay be D isposal: applicable if conditions for biological degradation are favourable. Enhancem ent techniques could be considered. Incineration, landfill and burial options m ay be lim ited by availability and the quantity/nature of the contam inated soil. Stabilisation techniques m ay be applicable prior to disposal. G D rilling Pit W aste D rilling pit w astes usually contain both solid and liquid com ponents. C onstituents of environm ental concern include salt, hydrocarbons, pH , drilling chem icals and biologically available heavy m etals. These con- stituents have the possibility of im pacting soil and w ater quality. Waste Management Options R educe: The volum e of drilling pit w astes m ay be reduced by judi- cious use of rig w ash w ater, by releasing w ater that does not contain hydrocarbons or high salinity from the pit, by avoiding the collection of rainw ater run-off in the pit or by reusing the w ater in the drilling fluid. D rilling w aste volum e m ay be m inim ised by the use of a closed loop m ud system . R euse: Solids m ay be applicable for the lining or capping of landfill sites, or as a road construction m aterial. R ecycle/ R ecovered w eighting m aterials and drilling fluids m ay be R ecover: recycled into the drilling fluid of the sam e or different w ell. C om m ercial m ud plants m ay take used drilling fluids for recycle. Treatm ent/ O ptions for the disposal of aqueous drilling pit w astes D isposal: include surface discharge and injection. B efore the aque- ous phase can be surface discharged, it should be treated to rem ove hydrocarbons and excess suspended solids and to adjust the pH to w ithin the acceptable range. The dis- solved salt and biologically available m etal content m ust be at a level w hich w ill not cause an adverse im pact on the receiving environm ent. Liquids w hich cannot be treat- ed to a standard suitable for surface discharge m ay have to be injected. The options for m anagem ent of solid drilling pit w astes include burial in the pit; landfarm ing, landspreading or com - posting to reduce organic content; therm al treatm ents to recover or destroy organics; injection; and stabilisation or solidification. G D rum s/C ontainers M etal and plastic containers are used for a w ide range of lubricants and chem icals used throughout the industry. The accum ulation and disposal of these can be problem atic. D rum s and containers inevitably contain variable quantities of residues. The im pact arises from both the volum e and pres- ence of residues. Waste Management options R educe: B ulk transport and storage should be considered for high volum e consum ption item s. R euse: C ertain containers can be refilled from bulk storage and reused. W here possible, non-refillable containers should be returned to the vendor for reuse, or to a com pany specialis- ing in container refurbishm ent. 37 A PPEN D IX 5 D rum s and containers can be used for the transportation of suitable w astes provided safety considerations are not com prom ised. R ecycle/ B oth m etal and certain plastic drum s and containers m ay R ecover: be recycled if outlets are available. H ow ever, this m ay require that they be cleaned of any residues beforehand. Treatm ent/ D rum s should be crushed prior to landfill. The nature of D isposal: any residues m ay restrict this option or require pre-cleaning. Incineration m ay be applicable to plastic containers, but incinerators m ay need to be equipped w ith air pollution control devices. G G arbageInert Solid W aste This includes w ood, plastics, paper, food w aste, general garbage and inert construction and m aintenance m aterials. The environm ental im pact m ay arise from the encouragem ent of verm in by food w astes, production of gases by biodegradable m aterials and leachates w here other site m aterials such as chem ical residues have been m ixed in w ith the w aste. Waste Management Options R educe: P ackaging w astes such as paper and plastic can be reduced by the use of bulk handling system s or big bags. Segregation of com ponents such as w ood, plastic and paper, for recycling or reuse w ill reduce the quantity for disposal. R euse: W here the inert w aste consists totally of construction m aterial, it m ay be usable as infill. R ecycle/ M aterials such as w ood, paper and m etals m ay be R ecover: segregated for recycling. G eneral garbage is frequently incinerated and som e inciner- ators are fitted w ith heat recovery. Treatm ent/ Landfill is the m ost com m on disposal m ethod em p- D isposal: loyed. Local conditions m ay lim it this option. B urial of these w astes m ay be an option w hen a suitable landfill is not available. Incineration using fixed or m obile facilities w ill greatly reduce the w aste volum e for landfill. Techniques such as com posting m ay be used to reduce the volum e of dom estic w aste through biodegradation. G Pit, Tank and Vessel B ottom W astes This w aste consists of w ater, accum ulated hydrocarbons, solids, sand and em ulsions w hich collect in the low er sections of slop oil tanks, crude oil stock tanks, closed w ater drain tanks, open w ater drain tanks and other 38 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES storage and separation vessels as w ell as in produced w ater storage or em ergency pits. C onstituents of these w astes that m ay im pact selection of w aste m anage- m ent and disposal m ethods include hydrocarbons, salts, m etals, produc- tion chem icals and occasionally N O R M . Possible environm ental im pacts w ill depend on the concentrations of these constituents and the w aste m anagem ent option(s) chosen. Waste Management Options R educe: Im proved housekeeping procedures m ay reduce the volum e of solids collected in drainage w ater storage tanks. The w aste volum e m ay be reduced through evaporation or dew atering. R euse: Suitable w astes m ay be m ixed w ith absorbent m aterial (e.g. lim e) and applied as road surfacing m aterial, or m ixed w ith aggregate in an asphalt batch process. R ecycle/ S ludges containing significant oil m ay be reclaim ed R ecover: either onsite or offsite for the rem oval and recovery of hydrocarbons. Treatm ent/ These sludges m ay be landfilled, if dry. D isposal: These sludges m ay be landspread or landfarm ed. C onsideration w ill have to be m ade of the biodegradability of the organics, availability of land, loading rates, and possi- bility of ground or surface w ater contam ination. These sludges m ay be incinerated, w ith proper pollution control devices in place. G Process D rainage W aste System The process facility drainage system w astes w ill include w ashdow n w ater, boiler and cooling w ater blow dow ns, leaks and spills. The hazards w ill depend on the nature of the sources. A s w ith surface w ater drainage, physical effects such as erosion and tem perature m ay be considerations. Waste Management Options R educe: A leak m inim isation strategy should form an integral part of facility design and m aintenance procedures. A ll fuel, hydro- carbon and hazardous chem ical storage areas should be suf- ficiently bunded. D rip pans should be used w here needed. Spill clean-up procedures should be developed. R euse: Process w ater m ay be reused for activities requiring low er w ater quality (e.g. rig w ashing or flare suppression). R ecycle/ N /A R ecover: Treatm ent/ See rainw ater drainage D isposal: 39 A PPEN D IX 5 G Produced W ater O riginating from oil and gas production/processing, produced w ater w ill contain variable quantities of m ineral salts, solids, suspended and dis- solved hydrocarbons, and other organic and inorganic com ponents, and m ay be at high tem perature. The com position m ay change w ith tim e. It m ay require pre-treatm ent prior to disposal. The environm ental im pact w ill be highly dependent on the quantities involved, the com ponents, the receiving environm ent and dispersion char- acteristics. B efore significant or long-term discharge of produced w ater to the environ- m ent is carried out, an environm ental im pact study should be carried out. Waste Management Options R educe: W ater shut off treatm ents, re-perforation. R euse: R e-injection for reservoir pressure m aintenance or sec- ondary recovery of oil. Q uality m ay allow use for agricultural purposes or reuse as w ash w ater. R ecycle/ H eat content. R ecover: D e-salination. Treatm ent/ Surface discharge into the environm ent m ay be possible D isposal: depending on the w ater quality, volum e and flow . Prim ary treatm ent such as de-oiling w ill often be required. B io-treat- m ent m ay be practical for low volum es. D ow nhole injection to suitable form ations other than the producing form ation m ay be possible. H ow ever, the possi- bility of contam inating usable w ater aquifers m ust be taken into account. Evaporation and subsequent disposal of salts m ay be possible. G R ainw ater D rainage This w ill com e from all areas of the site/facilities. Surface drainage w ill be susceptible to contam ination from spills, leakage and leaching. The envir- onm ental im pact w ill depend on such contam ination along w ith physical considerations such as erosion. Waste Management Options R educe: C ontam ination of the surface drainage w ater should be avoided as this w ill be considerably easier than any subse- quent treatm ent. Thought should be given to the segregation of drainage from liquid storage, loading/unloading facilities, and operations areas from unim pacted areas of the site. R euse: C ollected rainw ater could be reused for agricultural purpos- es if quality perm its or could be used for activities requiring low er w ater quality such as w ashing or flare suppression. R ecycle/ N /A R ecover: 40 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES Treatm ent/ Surface disposal m ay be governed by contam ination. The D isposal: provision of a site drainage system w ith an oil/solids interceptor should be considered. A ny surface disposal option should be capable of taking the drainage volum es w ithout causing dam age by erosion or flooding, w hich w ould not otherw ise occur. D rainage w ater w ith a high organic content m ay be treated in biological w ater treatm ent system s to rem ove organics prior to discharge. G Sanitary W aste This covers all sew age and foul drainage. The im pact w ill be associated w ith the B O D , C oliform bacteria and treatm ent chem icals. Waste Management Options R educe: Low flow and low w ater use toilets m ay be used. R euse: N /A R ecycle/ D igested sew age sludge m ay be used for agricultural/land R ecover: im provem ent purposes. Treatm ent/ Full treatm ent septic system s to process all sew age should D isposal: be installed for all construction, drilling and production facili- ties, and cam ps on land. C onsideration m ay be required for m arine sew age system s for large offshore rig or platform operations. If chlorination is carried out, this should be strictly controlled and oxygenation m ay be required to prevent dam age to aquatic life. 41 A PPEN D IX 5 A PPEN D IX 6 This table sum m arises the w aste m inim isation options and possible treat- m ent and disposal m ethods that m ay be applicable to a variety of w astes typically found in E& P operations. This list is not exhaustive, and the m inim isation, treatm ent and disposal m ethods m ay vary according to available facilities, local conditions and regulatory requirem ents. Indication in the table that m inim isation options m ay exist does not necessarily m ean that a significant reduction in w aste volum e can be reasonably achieved. Sim ilarly, indication that a treatm ent or disposal option m ay be applicable does not necessarily m ean that it w ill be appropriate or effective for specific w aste stream s or all environm ents. C om binations of treatm ent and disposal m ethods m ay be required to m eet m anagem ent objectives. 42 W A STE M A N A G EM EN T G U ID ELIN ES W aste M anagem ent O ptions Sum m ary Table Treatment and Disposal Methods A = D eep W ell, B = Evaporation Ponds, C = Specialised W aste D isposal Facility, D = Incineration, E = Land Treatm ent, F = Landfill, G = B iological Treatm ent, H = R oad A pplication, I = Solidification, J = B iorem ediation, K = Surface W ater D ischarge (m ay require pretreatm ent) Minimisation Options Treatment and Disposal Method Waste Name Reduce Reuse Recycle A B C D E F G H I J K A cid G G G G G G G A ctivated C arbon G G G G G G B atteries, Lead A cid, G G G W et N IC A D C atalysts G G G G G C austic G G G G G G C hem ical W aste G G G G G G G C onstruction & D em olition G G G G G M aterial C ontainersD rum s/B arrels G G G G G G C ontam inated D ebris G G G G G G & SoilC hem icals C ontam inated Soil G G G G G G G G H ydrocarbon/Fuel D essicant G G G G G G D rilling Pit W aste G G G G G G G G G G G G Filter B ackw ash Liquids G G G G G Filters, C hem ical Treatm ent G G G G 43 A PPEN D IX 6 Minimisation Options Treatment and Disposal Method Waste Name Reduce Reuse Recycle A B C D E F G H I J K FiltersLube O il G G G G FiltersO ther (R aw gas, G G G G fuel, air) FiltersW ater G G G G arbageD om estic W aste G G G G G H ydrotest Fluids G G G Incinerator A sh G G G G G Insulation G G G Ion Exchange R esins G G G G Ion Exchange R esin G G G G R egenerant Liquids Iron Sponge G G Laboratory C hem icals G G G G G G Lubricating O il G G G H ydrocarbon Lubricating O ilSynthetic G G M olecular Sieve G G Paint A ssociated W astes G G G G G G PC B C ontam inated Solids G & Liquids Pigging W aste Liquids/W ax G G G Process W aters G G G Produced Sand G G G G G G G Produced W ater G G G G G G G R agsO ily G G G G G G R ainw ater D rainage G G G G Scrap M etal G G G G Sludge, G lycol system s G G G G G Sludge, G as Sw eetening G G G G G G Sludge, Tank & Vessel G G G G G G G G G B ottom s Sludge, W ater Treatm ent G G G Sanitary W astes G G G G W ell W orkover Fluids G G G G G G