INTRODUCTION Combat trauma is the term used to describe adverse psychological, emotional and spiritual reaction to the experience of armed combat. It is a subset of post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD). However, while PTSD can be brought about by any life-threatening situation automobile accident, robbery or a heart attack (Foy, 622), combat trauma is specifically the result of battle. There are almost 27 million veterans, of whom 22 million served during conflict. Forty-three million other Americans are dependents or survivors of a veteran (VA figures). Probably most Americans have a veteran somewhere in their families, and frequently several across generations. For example, my grandfather was drafted in World War I, my father served in World War II. My older brother escaped Viet Nams draft, but many of his age did not. In this paper, I will examine some psychological, emotional and spiritual characteristics of combat trauma and propose a pastoral approach to dealing with it in a civilian congregational setting. This paper does not address care of combat veterans still on active-duty or immediate responses to combat trauma such as would be used by military chaplains or mental health professionals. It does not address veterans who are receiving professional care through the Veterans Administrations systems. RELATIONSHIP OF THE TOPIC TO THIS COURSE According to the classic military theorist Karl Clausewitz, killing is the sine qua non of war: without killing there is no war. Soldiers in battle are surrounded by death and the threat of death. The battlefield is a grisly place. William Manchesters description of Iwo Jima could have been written about almost any large-scale battlefield: You tripped over strings of viscera fifteen feet long, over bodies which had been cut in half at the waist. Legs and arms, and heads bearing only necks, lay fifty feet from the closest torsos. As night fell, the beach reeked with the stench of burning flesh (Manchester, 340). Veterans cope with death in three broad categories. First, they struggle to accept that it is Page 1 of 16 American soldiers, stripped of all equipment, lie dead, face down in the slush of a crossroads somewhere on the western front. possible (even likely) that they might die. Second, they wrestle with the death of close friends due to enemy action, accident or disease. 1 Finally, many veterans carry the burden of having killed other human beings, sometimes in carload lots. These experiences lead to a pastoral challenge in our churches for which pastors should be prepared. Several World War II veterans have indicated to me that as their twilight years approach some of these issues are resurfacing. Even the youngest World War II veteran is at least 70. In addition to the common issues of aging and loss that elderly parishioners face, some of them (mostly men, but not exclusively) are now struggling with combat trauma again. THE EXPERIENCE OF COMBAT Fear and Fear Management The fear of death is the soldiers universal lot (Keegan, 17). In one U. S. division in France in 1944, two-thirds of the soldiers admitted that they had been too frightened to do their jobs properly at least once and forty percent said it happened routinely. A post-war Army study found, There is no such thing as getting used to combat. Each moment of combat imposes a strain so great that men will break down in direct relation to the intensity and duration of their exposure (Dyer, 142, 143). Indeed, several studies have noted that in battle, the seeds of panic are always present in soldiers. A Marine wrote of single-handedly entering a building to take out an enemy sniper: There was a door which meant there was another room and the sniper was in thatand I just broke down. I was absolutely gripped by fear that this man would expect me and would shoot me (Dyer, 101). 1 World War II was the first American conflict in which deaths due to disease were fewer than combat deaths. In the Persian Gulf War of 1990-1991, more American troops died in accidents than from Iraqi action. Page 2 of 16 Medics help a wounded solider in France, 1944. The symptoms of fear are well documented. The heart pounds violently; frequently the whole body shakes. Nausea occurs in about half the soldiers. A fifth lose control of their bowels. There is an urgent need to urinate. Many troops clench their jaw so tightly to control themselves that it aches for days afterwards (Dyer, 142; Keegan, 261). Stephen Getsinger noted that being wounded was often a relief to soldiers because the inevitable had finally happened and it meant that they would be out of action, at least for awhile. It also generally raised their esteem in the eyes of their fellows, since they had done their duty and had not broken down (assuming they werent wounded while fleeing) (Getsinger, 217). James Jones said the wounded had passed through some veil isolating him, and entered a realm where others, the unwounded, cannot follow. He has become a different person, and others treat him differently. . . . The lucky ones, those hurt badly enough [would obtain] everybodys secret goal: discharge (Jones, 86, 89). Armies must form fighting units in which fear is managed and subdued enough so that the military objective can be obtained. Therefore, commanders give extraordinary care and concern to their soldiers physical and mental well-being. The most effective means of managing the fear is to foster bonds of loyalty and affiliation for one another among the troopsbonds that only death can break, not the mere fear of death. If this effort is successful soldiers will ultimately cherish two things more than life: the lives of their buddies and their own reputations among their comrades. Personal honor is the one thing valued more than life by the majority of soldiers (Keegan, 52). One soldier wrote, We became great friends and one just cant describe the affinity there was. We were all in it together and it was a question of whats mine is thine (Keegan, 273). There is no civilian equivalent of this environment, with these bonds, except possibly in Page 3 of 16 Sometimes youre lucky! Coast Guardsman Charles Tyner examines the shrapnel hole in the helmet he wore during the initial assault on the beaches of Southern France. Tyner suffered just a superficial scratch. police or firefighting organizations. Therefore, the soldiers sitz im Leben is crucial to understanding the context of veterans combat trauma and how it is manifested. James Jones, who survived Pearl Harbor and was wounded on Guadalcanal, wrote of the return of combat veterans to America after the end of World War II: Articles appeared in womens magazines with titles like, Will He Be Changed? Good Housekeeping said, After two or three weeks [Jones italics] he should be finished with talking, with oppressive remembering. If he still goes over the same stories, you had best consult a psychiatrist. This condition is neurotic. Men still woke up in the middle of the night, thrashing around and trying to get their hands on their wifes throats. Men still rolled out from a dead sleep, and hit the dirt with a crash on the bedroom floor, huddling against the bed to evade the bomb or shell they had dreamed they heard coming. While their wives sat straight up in bed in their new frilly nightgowns bought for the homecoming, wide-eyed and staring, horrified. A number of men I knew slept with loaded pistols or unsheathed bayonets under their pillows for a number of months. Just made them feel more comfortable, they said shamefacedly, but it sure scared the shit out of their wives. And their wives psychiatrists. As the old combat numbness disappeared, and the frozen feet of the soul began to thaw. . [came] the sick-making thoughts of all the buddies who had died. The awful bad luck of the maimed. Page 4 of 16 About the last thing to go was the old sense of esprit. That was the hardest thing to let go of, because there was nothing in civilian life that could replace it (Jones, 255,256). The Loss of Friends Soldiers frequently fear the death of friends more than their own death. 2 That is the reason that self-sacrificial acts are common, such as jumping on top of a grenade to shield others from the blast. William Manchester, badly wounded on Okinawa, wrote, Among men who fight together there is an intense love; the thought of his friends facing danger without him to help them was just intolerable. Those men on the line were my family, my home. They were closer to me than I can say. I had to be with them, rather than let them die and me live with the knowledge that I might have saved them (Manchester, 391). Upon learning of Jonathans death, King David lamented, I grieve for you, Jonathan my brother; you were very dear to me. Your love for me was wonderful, more wonderful than that of women (2 Sam 1:26). As David discovered, the deaths of friends can cause strong reactions. A veteran of World War I wrote home, One of the most pathetic features of the war, he wrote, is this continual forming of real friendships which last for a week or two, or even months, and are then suddenly shattered for ever by death. However, the death of a comrade is more than just depressing: it knocks away one of the props which sustains a soldiers morale, and suggests to him that his own death may be near (Keegan, 265). That their friends die is bad enough, but the deaths are harder to bear because they are often so violent. Rifleman John Harris heard his friend cry out in battle and looked around to see him sitting doubled up, swaying back and forth as if he had an intense stomach ache. He had been shot sideways through both hips. Oh, Harris! said he, as I took him in my arms, I shall die! The agony is so great I cannot bear it! . . . the froth came from his mouth and the perspiration poured from his face. . . he suffered more for the short time that he was dying than any other man 2 During the Panama operation of December 1989, I heard that my best friends unit had been mortared. The mere idea that he could have been killed or wounded made me break down. Later, I discovered that the report was false, to my great relief. Page 5 of 16 Capt. Ezekia Smith, 92nd Div., receives treatment for shell fragments in face and shoulders suffered near Querceta, Italy. Marines carry off a fallen comrade on Iwo Jima. I think I ever saw (Keegan, 148). An American sergeant after D-Day related, They had my closest friends laying alongside the ditches of this road, ready for pick up by the graves registration unit. You walk by them and you see their faces and its a sad thing. . . it does upset you (Keegan, 273). Cadet Shirer was a medic assigned to a US hospital caring for wounded soldiers in France in WW I. One case I never forgot. When me and the nurse passed him, hed say, Sister, can't you help me? He was burnt, blinded in both eyes, with mustard gas. He'd had chlorine gas. The nurse said, Take care of this man, he's going to die. His name was Stanislaus Nagursky. I worked with him and I worked with him. I think his suffering controlled my whole life. Later I picked up Stars and Stripes and learned he didn't die. Was I happy! Would you believe a man could take so much interest in another man that he'd remember a name like that for 79 years? I still see him in my sleep at times. I still see him in my sleep (Life, 94). It is a particular burden to have been a combat leader who has given orders which resulted in the deaths of ones own soldiers. Officers must use up their mens lives in order to win battles. Paul Fussell, an infantry officer, wrote that one of the most painful things was having to withhold your affection for them [ones troops] because you know youre going to have to destroy them on occasion. And you do. You use them up: theyre material. Officers pay a price, though, of suffering twice the casualty rate Page 6 of 16 Dead Japanese in a pillbox on the island of Engebi. of their soldiers. (Dyer, 139, 140). Yet the grief for the slain is reserved only for ones buddies. The death of someone not known makes virtually no impression. William Manchester pulled to safety a mortally wounded soldier whom he had never met before. Had circumstances be different, I would have consoled him. But a foot soldier retains his sanity only by hardening himself. . . . I saved my tears for the men I knew (Manchester, 316). The dichotomy between hyper-emotional attachment on the one hand and extreme disinterest bordering on callousness on the other is a psychic conflict which is not usually found in civilian life and can make readjustment difficult. Killing William Manchester called the recollection of killing the enemy, blood that never dried. He was on a Boeing 747 when one of my worst recollections, one I had buried in my deepest memory bank long ago, comes back with a clarity so blinding that I surge forward against the seat belt, appalled by it, filled with remorse and shame. I am remembering the first man I slew. It was a Japanese sniper. Manchester killed him with a .45-caliber pistol. I began to tremble, then to shake all over. I sobbed, Im sorry. Then I threw up all over myself (Manchester, 3, 7). American military commanders of this century have noted that American troops are inherently reluctant to kill the enemy. A highly regarded World War II study discovered that only about fifteen percent of American riflemen actually fired their weapons in battle, and that most of those who did shoot missed deliberately, to force the enemy to take concealment. When asked why, they readily admitted that they didnt want to hurt anyone. The studys author attributed this reluctance to deeply inbred American cultural pacifism and the religious teachings of the troops (Dyer, 129e). Page 7 of 16 The immediate effects of combat trauma from taking life is greater on infantrymen than, say, artillery troops, who rarely see the results of their work. A Viet Nam infantryman related, I got around to the side [of the enemy] and pointed my M16 at them and this person turned around and just stared, and I froze, cos it was a boy, I would say between the ages of twelve and fourteen. When he turned at me and looked, all of a sudden he turned his whole body at me and pointed his automatic weapon at me, I just opened up, fired the whole twenty rounds right into the kid, and he just laid there. I dropped my weapon and cried. . . (Keegan, 257). High-altitude bomber pilots had some cushion against the psychological effects of daily combat (Dyer, 153a). A fighter pilot noted that you dont hear the shouts, you dont see the face and you dont see the blood of the enemy in an airplane (Keegan. 193). However, crews of aircraft such as bombers do face the horror of suffering and witnessing violent deaths. For pastoral purposes, then, it is useful to remember that veterans experiences of killing were different, depending on how they did it. The lingering issues needing pastoral intervention cant be lumped into one hat, all benefitting from similar responses. Guilt and Guilt Conflicts Veterans of ground combat may have deep-seated problems with what they did in the heat of battleacts that violated their innate sense of rightness or the Law of Land Warfare. 3 An infantry sergeant told James Jones how his platoon had taken eight German prisoners during the battle of the Bulge: We needed some information, but they werent talking, not those tough old birds. So we took the first one off to the side, where they could see him, and shot him through the head. Then they all talked. Horrible? Evil? We needed that information. Our lives depended on it. We didnt think it was evil. Neither did they. But how am I going to tell my wife something like that? Or my mother? They dont understand the problems (Jones, 255). During the battle for Okinawa, 85 Japanese nurses took shelter in a cave. Marines heard their 3 This is the U.S. statute that codifies the various Hague and Geneva treaties and conventions. Page 8 of 16 voices, but neither they nor their interpreter recognized them as feminine. When the nurses didnt surrender, the Marines killed them all with flamethrowers (Manchester, 381). More than 30 American troops were killed in the Gulf War by erroneous or careless fire from other Americans. One of the most difficult things for combat soldiers to adjust to is the fact that in battle, st happens. As an old Army saying goes, Anything you do in combat can get you killed, including doing nothing. The deaths of friends or civilians killed by accident or bad luck in the middle of battle can be terribly traumatic, especially for the soldiers directly involved in it, such as the Marines who killed the nurses. These sorts of lingering guilt issues over what should have been done or not done can be the most difficult ones for veterans to work through. One aircrew member wrote home from the front, Now more than ever I am determined to wipe these rotten bastards off the face of the earth. Total and complete destruction is the only way to treat these animals. I never thought I could hate them as much as I do now (Keegan, 159). Such feelings of animosity can be very strong long after the war is over. A pastor told me this year that he was upbraided by one of his parishioners, a World War II veteran, for buying a Honda automobile, a Japanese make. More frequently, though, a veterans combat trauma is conflicted because of mixed feelings toward the enemy whom he has tried to kill. A Viet Nam veteran wrote of the North Vietnamese soldier, He was a trained soldier, and I was a trained soldier. And I respected him, and Im pretty sure he respected me, you know. His job was to kill me, my job was to kill him (Keegan 267). Impromptu truces are commonplace between opposing forces. In 1914 German and British officers and men met peacefully in most sectors, exchanged presents, took photographs and even played football [soccer] (Keegan, 268). In the Normandy battle in 1944, an American commander granted a truce to the Germans so the wounded could be evacuated. The German officer came out to meet the American, who spoke German. The German related that his forces had been ordered to withdraw from their position at dusk. Immediately, the American said he would not continue the attack until after dark, when the Germans would be gone. They shook hands and did not shoot at each other again. In the same campaign, an American ambulance driver made a wrong turn and was stopped by a German sentry. The German saw the wounded soldiers and pointed the driver toward American lines. A Page 9 of 16 few hours later, the Germans were astonished to see another American ambulance drive up. The driver got out, waved, and dropped several cases of cigarettes on the ground. Then he drove away (Ambrose, 1). What About Women Veterans? Fortunately for women, very few of them have suffered the intensity of combat that many male veterans have, due to restrictions on assignment of women to combat roles. However, these restrictions have been greatly lessened in recent years. Women are prevented by law from being assigned to infantry, armor, field artillery and a few other combat-specific specialties or units, but they are assignable to combat aircraft and vessels. So far, almost all the studies done of combat trauma have been about men. No studies have been done of both men and women who served in the same unit. Currently, women comprise nearly 4.5 percent of the total veteran population and more than 10 percent of the present active duty force compared to two percent during World War II. These percentages will likely increase (Dougherty, 1). During World War II, women were assigned as weather observers and forecasters, cryptographers, radio operators and repairmen, sheet metal workers, parachute riggers, link trainer instructors, bombsight maintenance specialists, aerial photograph analysts, and control tower operators. By January 1945 only 50 percent of AAF [Army Air Forces] WACs [Womens Army Corps] held traditional assignments such as file clerk, typist, and stenographer. Sixteen WACs were awarded the Purple Heart for death or injury due to enemy action, most of whom were killed or injured by German V-l buzz-bombs while stationed in London. (Bellafaire, 1). Women were killed in action in World War II and made prisoner by the Japanese. During the Persian Gulf War, several women were killed in action by missile attack and the Iraqis took at least two prisoner, one of whom was sexually assaulted. However, there are so few women who suffered these experiences that it would be quite unusual for a particular congregation to have one as a member. It is more likely that women veterans will have served in non-combat roles unless their service was quite recent. Nonetheless, some of these roles carry their own set of issues of death and dying, especially Page 10 of 16 Nurses caring for patients in a MASH unit, Korean War. nurses. 4 The first female veterans who were recognized to have combat trauma were military nurses in Viet Nam. Of the female veterans who served in the Vietnam theater 8.5 percent suffer from war-related PTSD, while an additional 7.2 percent show partial symptoms of the disorder (Dougherty, 1). World War II Nurse Ruth Hess described setting up an evacuation hospital just behind American forces sweeping through France: We arrived late in the evening and spent all night getting ready to receive patients, setting up the tents and equipment. Then went to work, for nine days we never stopped. Eight hundred eighty patients operated; small debridement of gunshot and shrapnel wounds, numerous amputations, fractures galore, perforated guts, livers, spleens, kidneys, lungs, everything imaginable. We cared for almost 1,500 patients in those nine days. Then the hospital packed and moved forward, closer to the front (Ambrose, 1). There are differences in the effects of combat trauma on females than on males. Compared to men, women veterans: are five times more likely to develop combat trauma symptoms, and have a higher lifetime prevalence of combat trauma symptoms, have a lower rate of alcohol and drug disorders but higher rates of major depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, and phobias, are more likely to be suicidal, suffer more severe depressive episodes (Dougherty, 1). The most likely type of combat trauma for women is survivors guilt, the nagging feeling 4 The Womens Army Corps and the Army Nurse Corps were not the same. Nurses were not part of the WAC. Page 11 of 16 that they could have done just one more thing to save a particular patient. Professional, or career, nurses may be less likely to manifest this symptom than women who joined the service to be a nurse for the present emergency, as the saying went in the world wars. However, field hospitals and aid stations were by no means immune to enemy attack despite convention restrictions. Combat-area nurses shared the same fears of death and wounds as their patients. One of the chief contributors to womens combat trauma difficulties was the lack of peer groups upon demobilization. There were no distaff equivalents of the VFW. Women veterans had little opportunity to talk out their feelings and emotions. PASTORAL CARE FOR VETERANS IN A CONGREGATIONAL SETTING At the outset, congregational pastors should realize that overt manifestations of combat trauma will be unlikely. Usually, serious psychological disorders requiring professional care will have manifested themselves before the veteran left the service. These persons will almost certainly be under care of the VA. If so, a pastor should not attempt independent care for that veteran. Recent research into combat trauma suggest strongly that memories are amplified as time passes. In a study of Gulf War veterans, Seventy percent of subjects recalled traumatic events at 2 years that they had not reported at 1 month. Subjects with greater PTSD symptom levels were significantly more likely to amplify their memory of combat trauma at the 2-year assessment (Hales, 143). It is most likely that lingering effects of combat trauma will be triggered by certain dates, such as Memorial Day, Veterans Day or VE/VJ Day, since pain is often associated with anniversary reactions (Foy, 630). These days should not pass unnoticed by a congregation with significant veteran membership. It is not necessary to dedicate an entire service to these occasion, but there should definitely be some sort of pastoral recognition. Something as simple as a timely phone call or an encouraging note can be meaningful to a parishioner who is experiencing painful memories (Foy, 630). A ecclesial distinction should be made between Memorial Day and Veterans Day. Memorial Day is intended to honor war dead; Veterans Day is intended to honor living veterans. Pastors should not confuse the two intentions because veterans certainly dont, especially those who lost Page 12 of 16 With a canvas tarpaulin for a church and packing cases for an altar, a chaplain holds memorial mass for Marines at Saipan. friends in the service. It would be a good idea to approach one or two veterans of the congregation and ask them to design the appropriate recognition, within the limits of the order of service. Of course, pastors must be careful to honor the intentions of these days without glorifying war. Rhetorically, one must walk a fine line between honoring the sacrifices on the one hand (good) while not using triumphal language of domination and conquest (bad). By no means should the nations erstwhile enemies be subjected to calumny. Not only is it lousy theology, it would almost certainly be very offensive to most veterans. 5 Themes of peace and reconciliation are well received. Issues of war and peace offer a pastor an opportunity to wrestle with some of the most difficult theological problems. In particular, a service of communion brings forth stark images of blood and broken body which offer chances to address the spiritual issues of combat trauma. Sacred heart of the crucified Jesus, take away this murdering hate and gives us thine own eternal love, William Manchester prayed (Manchester, 391). In the eucharistic feast, wine becomes blood and bread becomes flesh. The 5 However, I continue to be surprised by the very strong feelings of hostility against the Japanese by many (but not all) World War II veterans. Such animosity is rare against the Germans. A man in my congregation was shot down over Germany and held prisoner for 14 months. His apparent feelings toward Germany are positive, but he is venomous toward Japan, even though he never fought against them. The reasons for this sort of hostility against Japan are complex, but seem to be due to the Pearl Harbor attack, the fact that the Japanese method of war was exceptionally brutal, and outright ethnic spite against the Asian race. Page 13 of 16 The sea gave up the dead that were in it . . . material is transformed into the spiritual. The transformation is accomplished by the historical and material sacrifice of Jesus called Christ. This sacrifice is the material transformation of the dichotomy of existence. To the extent the pastor presents through word and sacrament this transcendence, he or she represents the actions of Jesus Christ. . . . In the issue of war, one clearly finds the dichotomy of human existence. (Dictionary, 1315). Veterans may suffer from survivors guilt in dreams, where unconscious guilts are often manifested. . . . Fears that they could have done something to save their buddies if they had tried frequently haunt veterans (Getsinger, 217). This kind of guilt will likely not be verbalized readily. It is the pastors goal to foster insight and self-actualization. He promotes a climate in which realistic understanding of needs, goals and options may be examined. This takes place within the context of a religious community as regards acceptance, nurturance, and the ultimate regard of every individual as an end in himself . . . within the context of an ethic of redemptive love (Getsinger, 218). Specific tips for a pastor helping a veteran with combat trauma are: 6 Do not marginalize veterans in the congregation because of ones own political, religious or ideological beliefs and values. Remember that there is almost no one more inclined to pacifism than those who have served in war. Do not try to shut off expressions of guilt, condemnation or anger by the veteran. Do not moralize about the rightness and wrongness of the veterans feelings. 6 Most of these suggestions generally follow Getsinger, 217, and Foy, 631, with my own amplification. Since I have conflated them, it would be too awkward to attribute each point individually. Page 14 of 16 . . . and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what he had done. (Rev 20:13) Make use of the pastoral office as a representative of a religious tradition that stresses both the reality of sin and forgiveness and healing. Be alert for self-destructive indications. However, listen carefully. Many veterans may express bafflement at having survived, such as, I just dont see why I am alive. This kind of expression is not a suicide indicator. Be observant for changes in emotional states as significant dates come up. It is normal for reminiscing to occur, but morose emotionalism may indicate a need for pastoral intervention. Do not stereotype veterans as permanently scarred spiritually. Assume that their stress is caused by their experiences, not spiritual weakness or immaturity. Appropriate role expectations for the helper are support, alliance and advocacy. Recognize that recovery from combat trauma can be a lifelong process. Help the veteran to understand that experiences cannot be done over and losses cannot be restored, but they can be grieved. Be willing to encourage private rituals on the veterans part to help work through grief and loss. Page 15 of 16 BIBLIOGRAPHY Photo credits: National Archives Ambrose, Stephen E. The Toughest Job in World War II: Medicine in the U. S. Army. American Heritage magazine, Nov. 97, Internet page http://www.americanheritage.com/97/nov/medic.htm Bellafaire, Judith A. The Womens Army Corps: a Commemoration of World War II Service. Center for Military History Publication 72-15, undated, published at http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/wac.htm Dictionary of Pastoral Care and Counseling. Rodney J. Hunter, ed. Abingdon, Nashville. 1990 Dougherty, Willie. Women Veterans: Survivors of a Secret BattlePTSD. Veterans News and Information Service, undated, published at http://www.vnis.com/vetnews/vvoa9697.txt Dyer, Gwynne. War. Crown Publishers, New York, 1985 Foy, David W., et. al. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Clinical handbook of Pastoral Counseling, Volume 2, Robert J. Wicks and Richard D. Parsons, ed. Integration Books, Paulist Press, New York, p. 621 Getsinger, Stephen H. Pastoral Counseling and the Combat Veteran in Journal of Religion and Health 14, 1975, p. 214 Hales, Robert E., M.D. What is PTSD? The American Journal of Psychiatry, Feb. 97. Jones, James. World War II. Ballantine Books, New York, 1975 Keegan, John and Richard Holmes. Soldiers, a History of Men in Battle. Hamish Hamilton, London, 1985 Manchester, William. Goodbye, Darkness: A Memoir of the Pacific War. Little, Brown and Company, 1979. ________ . Sunset on the Western Front, Life, magazine, Nov. 1997 p. 94 Page 16 of 16