The Supreme Court ruled that the passage of RA No. 10153, which reset the elections in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) to 2013 to coincide with national elections, did not violate the Philippine Constitution's requirement of three readings on separate days. While bills typically require three readings on separate days, there is an exception when the President certifies the necessity of a bill's immediate enactment. In this case, the President certified the need to immediately enact a law synchronizing the ARMM elections with national elections, exempting the bill from the three readings requirement.
The Supreme Court ruled that the passage of RA No. 10153, which reset the elections in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) to 2013 to coincide with national elections, did not violate the Philippine Constitution's requirement of three readings on separate days. While bills typically require three readings on separate days, there is an exception when the President certifies the necessity of a bill's immediate enactment. In this case, the President certified the need to immediately enact a law synchronizing the ARMM elections with national elections, exempting the bill from the three readings requirement.
The Supreme Court ruled that the passage of RA No. 10153, which reset the elections in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) to 2013 to coincide with national elections, did not violate the Philippine Constitution's requirement of three readings on separate days. While bills typically require three readings on separate days, there is an exception when the President certifies the necessity of a bill's immediate enactment. In this case, the President certified the need to immediately enact a law synchronizing the ARMM elections with national elections, exempting the bill from the three readings requirement.
Article VI. Section 26. Subject and Title of Bills; Three Readings FACTS: Several laws pertaining to the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) were enacted by Congress. RA No. 6734 is the organic act that established the ARMM and scheduled the first regular elections for the ARMM regional officials. RA No. 9054 amended the ARMM Charter and reset the regular elections for the ARMM regional officials to the second Monday of September 2001. RA No. 9140 further reset the first regular elections to November 26, 2001. RA No. 9333 reset for the third time the ARMM regional elections to the 2 nd Monday of August 2005 and on the same date every 3 years thereafter. Pursuant to RA No. 9333, the next ARMM regional elections should have been held on August 8, 2011. COMELEC had begun preparations for these elections and had accepted certificates of candidacies for the various regional offices to be elected. But on June 30, 2011, RA No. 10153 was enacted, resetting the next ARMM regular elections to May 2013 to coincide with the regular national and local elections of the country. In these consolidated petitions filed directly with the Supreme Court, the petitioners assailed the constitutionality of RA No. 10153. ISSUES: Whether or not the passage of RA No. 10153 violate the three-readings-on-separate- days rule under Section 26(2), Article VI of the 1987 Constitution RULING: No, the passage of RA No. 10153 does not violate the three-readings-on-separate-days requirement in Section 26(2), Article VI of the 1987 Constitution. The general rule that before bills passed by either the House or the Senate can become laws they must pass through three readings on separate days, is subject to the exception when the President certifies to the necessity of the bills immediate enactment. In the present case, the records show that the President wrote to the Speaker of the House of Representatives to certify the necessity of the immediate enactment of a law synchronizing the ARMM elections with the national and local elections. The Presidents certification exempted both the House and the Senate from having to comply with the three separate readings requirement.