Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 265

CULVERTRATINGGUIDE

August2009

2009TexasDepartmentofTransportation
allrightsreserved

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

(pageintentionallyleftblank)

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

ii

TexasDepartmentofTransportation

CulvertRatingGuide

WILLIAMD.LAWSON,P.E.,PH.D.
CenterforMultidisciplinaryResearchinTransportation
TexasTechUniversity,Lubbock,Texas

TIMOTHYA.WOOD,M.S.C.E.
CenterforMultidisciplinaryResearchinTransportation
TexasTechUniversity,Lubbock,Texas

CHARLESD.NEWHOUSE,P.E.,PH.D.
DepartmentofCivil&EnvironmentalEngineering
VirginiaMilitaryInstitute,Lexington,VA

PRIYANTHAW.JAYAWICKRAMA,PH.D.
CenterforMultidisciplinaryResearchinTransportation
TexasTechUniversity,Lubbock,Texas

SubjectAreas

ReinforcedConcreteBoxCulverts,LoadRating,LoadPosting,StructuralAnalysis

ResearchSponsoredbytheTexasDepartmentofTransportation
inCooperationwiththeFederalHighwayAdministration

TexasDepartmentofTransportation
Austin,TX2009

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

iii

RESEARCHPROGRAMSPONSORSHIP
ThisCulvertRatingGuidewasdevelopedaspartofTxDOTresearchprojectNo.05849,EvaluatingExisting
CulvertsforLoadCapacityAllowingforSoilStructureInteraction,sponsoredthroughTxDOTsResearch
ManagementCommittee5(StructuresandHydraulics)andfundedinSeptember2007.
TheTxDOTProjectMonitoringCommitteeforthisresearchprojectincludedthefollowingpersons:
MANUELB.BERNIECARRASCO,P.E.,BridgeDivision(ProjectDirector)
FARRENS.BASSE,P.E.,BridgeDivision(ProjectAdvisor)
JONH.KILGORE,P.E.,SanAntonioDistrict(ProjectAdvisor)
ROGERJ.LOPEZ,P.E.,HoustonDistrict(ProjectAdvisor)
MARKA.STEVES,P.E.,BridgeDivision(ProjectAdvisor)
MARKP.MCCLELLAND,P.E.,BridgeDivision(ProjectAdvisor)
ThemembersoftheProjectMonitoringCommitteeselectedtomonitorthisprojectandtoreviewthisdocument
werechosenforrecognizedscholarlycompetenceandwithdueconsiderationforthebalanceofdisciplines
appropriatetotheproject.Eachreportisreviewedandacceptedforpublicationbythetechnicalcommittee
accordingtoproceduresestablishedandmonitoredbytheTxDOTResearchandTechnologyImplementation
Office.

AUTHORACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
TheresearchuponwhichthisCulvertRatingGuideisbasedrepresentsacollaborativeeffortofthreeentities:the
CenterforMultidisciplinaryResearchinTransportationatTexasTechUniversitywhoperformedtheresearch,the
TxDOTProjectMonitoringCommitteewhoprovidedoversightandreview,andtheTxDOTLubbockDistrictwho
assistedwithfieldloadtestactivities.Theauthorsthankeachpersonwhohelpedwiththeresearchstudyfortheir
technicalcapability,professionalism,andenthusiasmfortheproject.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

iv

TABLEOFCONTENTS
TableofContents.....................................................................................................................................................iv
ListofFigures..........................................................................................................................................................vii
ListofTables.............................................................................................................................................................ix
ListofEquations........................................................................................................................................................x
I.

Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................1
A.

Purpose.............................................................................................................................................................1

B.

TxDOTsCulvertDesignHistory........................................................................................................................1

C.

Scope................................................................................................................................................................2

D.

RatingPhilosophy.............................................................................................................................................2

E.

AboutthisGuide...............................................................................................................................................3

II.

PolicyRequirements.............................................................................................................................................5
A.

PolicySourceDocuments.................................................................................................................................5

B.

FailureModes...................................................................................................................................................5

C.

CriticalSections................................................................................................................................................5

D.

LoadCases........................................................................................................................................................7

E.

RatingVariables................................................................................................................................................8

F.

RatingEquations...............................................................................................................................................9

III. CulvertLoadRatingProcedure...........................................................................................................................11
A.

ContextforLoadRating..................................................................................................................................11

B.

VisualInspectionoftheCulvert......................................................................................................................12

C.

TheCulvertLoadRatingProcess....................................................................................................................12

D.

SelectionoftheProperLevelofAnalysis.......................................................................................................15

E.

ReviewingandCheckingCalculations.............................................................................................................15

IV. CulvertDetails.....................................................................................................................................................17
A.

Overview.........................................................................................................................................................17

B.

Units...............................................................................................................................................................17

C.

Dimensions.....................................................................................................................................................18

D.

Material(Structural)Properties.....................................................................................................................19

E.

SoilParameters...............................................................................................................................................20
1.

SoilUnitWeight.........................................................................................................................................20

2.

ModulusofSubgradeReaction..................................................................................................................20

3.

SoilElasticModulusandPoissonsRatio....................................................................................................21

F.

ReinforcingSteelSchedule.............................................................................................................................23

G.

CulvertInstallationMethod............................................................................................................................24

V.

CulvertCapacityCalculations.............................................................................................................................25
A.

PolicyGuidance..............................................................................................................................................25

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

B.

SignConventionforLoadRatingCalculations................................................................................................25

C.

CulvertCapacityCalculationsforCriticalSections.........................................................................................26
1.

BendingMomentCapacity.........................................................................................................................26

2.

ShearCapacity............................................................................................................................................29

3.

ThrustCapacity...........................................................................................................................................30

VI. AnalyticalModelingforDemandLoads..............................................................................................................31
A.

Overview.........................................................................................................................................................31

B.

GeneralizedStepbyStepProcedureforDeterminingDemandLoads..........................................................32

C.

ShearFailureModeAnalysis..........................................................................................................................33

D.

Level1Analysis:TwoDimensional,SimplySupportedStructuralFrameModel...........................................35

1.

Assumptions...............................................................................................................................................35

2.

ModelDimensions.....................................................................................................................................36

3.

BoundaryConditions..................................................................................................................................37

4.

Loads..........................................................................................................................................................38

5.

LoadCases..................................................................................................................................................44

6.

DemandLoadCalculations.........................................................................................................................44

7.

AnalyticalProgramCULV5.....................................................................................................................45

E.

Level2Analysis:TwoDimensionalStructuralFrameModelwithSoilSprings..............................................49
1.

Assumptions...............................................................................................................................................49

2.

ModelDimensions.....................................................................................................................................49

3.

BoundaryConditions..................................................................................................................................50

4.

Loads..........................................................................................................................................................51

5.

LoadCases..................................................................................................................................................52

6.

DemandLoadCalculations.........................................................................................................................52

7.

AnalyticalProgramRISA2DwithSpringSupports..................................................................................54

F.

Level3Analysis:TwoDimensionalFiniteElementSoilStructureInteractionModel....................................59
1.

Assumptions...............................................................................................................................................59

2.

ModelDimensions.....................................................................................................................................59

3.

BoundaryConditions..................................................................................................................................60

4.

Loads..........................................................................................................................................................61

5.

LoadCases..................................................................................................................................................62

6.

DemandLoadCalculations.........................................................................................................................62

7.

AnalyticalProgramRISA2DwithLinearElasticFiniteElements(LEFE)..................................................64

VII. TheGeneralAnalyticalModelforCulvertLoadRating.......................................................................................67
A.

TheLevel4AnalysisDefined..........................................................................................................................67

B.

WhentouseaLevel4Analysis.......................................................................................................................67

C.

CommentsonTwoDimensionalvs.ThreeDimensionalModels...................................................................68

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

vi

1.

Level4AnalysiswithaTwoDimensionalModel.......................................................................................68

2.

Level4AnalysiswithaThreeDimensionalModel.....................................................................................68

D.

PracticalConsiderationsforLevel4CulvertLoadRatingAnalyses................................................................69

VIII. Limitations..........................................................................................................................................................71
A.

CulvertType....................................................................................................................................................71

B.

FillDepth........................................................................................................................................................71

C.

BackfillDrainage.............................................................................................................................................71

D.

SoilParameters...............................................................................................................................................71

E.

AnalyticalModel.............................................................................................................................................71

IX. WorksCited........................................................................................................................................................73
AppendixA.

ExampleCulvertDetailsMC103:3span,10x7with6fill..............................................................75

1.

Overview....................................................................................................................................................76

2.

GeneralCulvertInformation......................................................................................................................77

3.

Dimensions.................................................................................................................................................78

4.

Material(Structural)Properties.................................................................................................................80

5.

SoilParameters..........................................................................................................................................80

6.

ReinforcingSteelSchedule.........................................................................................................................81

7.

CulvertInstallationMethod.......................................................................................................................83

AppendixB.

ExampleCulvertCapacityCalculations..............................................................................................85

AppendixC.

Level1:CULV5ExampleProblem.....................................................................................................89

AppendixD.

Level2:RISA2DwithSpringsExample...........................................................................................109

AppendixE.

Level3:RISA2DwithLEFEExample................................................................................................131

AppendixF.

PolicySourceDocuments................................................................................................................149

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

vii

LISTOFFIGURES
FigureII.1.Threedimensionalviewofaculvertindicatingtwodimensionalstrip.......................................................5
FigureII.2.A.Momentcriticalsectionsforculvertswithouthaunches.........................................................................6
FigureIII.1.LoadPostingGuidelines(TxDOTBridgeInspectionManualFig.53)........................................................11
FigureIII.2.FlowchartdepictingtheTxDOTculvertloadratingprocess....................................................................13
FigureIV.1.Culvertdimensions...................................................................................................................................18
FigureIV.2.topslabcrosssectionlabeledforpositivebending.................................................................................23
FigureVI.1.AShearcriticalsectionsforculvertswithouthaunches............................................................................33
FigureVI.2.AModeldimensionsforaLevel1analysisforculvertswithouthaunches...............................................36
FigureVI.3.Boundaryconditionsfortwodimensional,simplysupportedstructuralframemodel...........................37
FigureVI.4.Loadconventionsfortwodimensional,simplysupportedstructuralframemodel................................38
FigureVI.5.LiveloaddistributionforD<2'fortwodimensional,simplysupportedstructuralframeanalysis........43
FigureVI.6.Liveloaddistributionfor2'<D<8'fortwodimensional,simplysupportedstructuralframeanalysis.43
FigureVI.7.LiveloaddistributionforD>8'fortwodimensional,Simplysupportedstructuralframeanalysis........43
FigureVI.8.CULV5inputformat............................................................................................................................VI46
FigureVI.9.CULV5memberandcriticalsectiondesign.............................................................................................47
FigureVI.10.Boundaryconditionsfortwodimensionalstructuralframeanalysiswithsoilsprings..........................50
FigureVI.11.Loadconventionsfortwodimensionalstructuralframeanalysiswithsoilsprings...............................51
FigureVI.12.LiveloaddistributionforD<2'fortwodimensionalstructuralframeanalysiswithsoilsprings..........53
FigureVI.13.Liveloaddistributionfor2'<D<8'fortwodimensionalstructuralframeanalysiswithsoilsprings...53
FigureVI.14.LiveloaddistributionforD>8'fortwodimensionalstructuralframeanalysiswithsoilsprings..........53
FigureVI.15.RISA2Dbeamelementlayoutpatternfor1,2,3,4and5spanculverts..............................................55
FigureVI.16.RISA2DmovingloadpatternforD<2'fortwodimensionalstructuralframeanalysiswithsoilsprings.
.....................................................................................................................................................................................56
FigureVI.17.RISA2Dmovingloadpatternfor2'<D<8'fortwodimensionalstructuralframeanalysiswithsoil
springs..........................................................................................................................................................................56
FigureVI.18.RISA2DmovingloadpatternforD>8'fortwodimensionalstructuralframeanalysiswithsoilsprings.
.....................................................................................................................................................................................56
FigureVI.19.RISA2Dmembernamingconvention....................................................................................................57
FigureVI.20.SoilStructureInteractionmodelLayout.................................................................................................60
FigureVI.21.Liveloaddistributionfortwodimensionalfiniteelementmodelwithsoilstructureinteraction.........63
FigureIX.1.Exampleculvertdesignsheet...................................................................................................................76
FigureIX.2.Exampleculvert,titleblockinformationfromplansheet........................................................................77
FigureIX.3.Exampleculvert,dimensionsfromplansheet..........................................................................................78
FigureIX.4.Crosssectionsketchoftheexampleculvertfortheanalyticalmodel.....................................................79
FigureIX.5.Exampleculvert,reinforcingschedulefromplansheet...........................................................................81
FigureIX.6.Exampleculvert,designationofreinforcingsteelasperplansheet........................................................82
FigureIX.7.RISA2Dglobalparameters.....................................................................................................................110
FigureIX.8.RISA2Dcornerjointcoordinates...........................................................................................................111
FigureIX.9.RISA2Dmembercreation......................................................................................................................112
FigureIX.10.RISA2Dmodellayoutcheck.................................................................................................................112
FigureIX.11.RISA2Dmodeladdingthenodesusingthejustaddfunction.......................................................113
FigureIX.12.RISA2Dmodeldefiningtheboundaryconditions.............................................................................114
FigureIX.13.RISA2Didentificationofallloadgroupsandusinggravityfeature..................................................115
FigureIX.14.RISA2Dapplicationofverticaldeadload(dlv).................................................................................115
FigureIX.15.RISA2Dapplicationofhorizontaldeadload(dlh)............................................................................116
FigureIX.16.RISA2Dapplicationofhorizontalliveload(llh)................................................................................116
FigureIX.17.RISA2Dhowtocreateamovingload...............................................................................................117
FigureIX.18.RISA2Daddingapatternanddefiningthemovingloadcase...........................................................118
FigureIX.19.RISA2Dapplythemovingloadtothestructure...............................................................................118
FigureIX.20.RISA2Danimatedgraphictocheckthemovingloadcase................................................................119
FigureIX.21.RISA2Dsplitmembertocreatecornercriticalsectionnodes..........................................................120

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

viii

FigureIX.22.RISA2Drelabelnodestorepresentcriticalsections.........................................................................121
FigureIX.23.RISA2Drelabeledbeamelementstofacilitatesortbymembernames...........................................121
FigureIX.24.RISA2Dcreationofloadcombinations.............................................................................................122
FigureIX.25.RISA2Dsolvingfordeadloaddemand,totalloadcase....................................................................123
FigureIX.26.RISA2Doutputshowingmembersectionforcesfordeterminingliveloaddemand.......................124
FigureIX.27.RISA2DwithLEFEremoveBCandloads..............................................................................................132
FigureIX.28.RISA2DwithLEFEnewnodelocations................................................................................................133
FigureIX.29.RISA2DwithLEFEsoilmaterialpropertydefinitions...........................................................................134
FigureIX.30.RISA2DwithLEFEdefineplateproperties...........................................................................................135
FigureIX.31.RISA2DwithLEFEdrawplates.............................................................................................................135
FigureIX.32.RISA2DwithLEFEplatesubmeshingcontrols.....................................................................................136
FigureIX.33.RISA2DwithLEFEplatesubmesh........................................................................................................136
FigureIX.34.RISA2DwithLEFEsoil"beam".............................................................................................................137
FigureIX.35.RISA2DwithLEFEboundaryconditions...............................................................................................138
FigureIX.36.RISA2DwithLEFEbasicloadcases......................................................................................................139
FigureIX.37.RISA2DwithLEFEmovingliveloaddefinition.....................................................................................140
FigureIX.38.RISA2DwithLEFEmovingliveloadanimation....................................................................................141
FigureIX.39.RISA2DwithLEFEsolvefordeadloaddemands.................................................................................142
FigureIX.40.RISA2DwithLEFEresultsfordeadloaddemands...............................................................................143
FigureIX.41.InventoryRatingandOperatingRatingforMC1033span10'x7'with6'fill......................................147

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

ix

LISTOFTABLES
TableII1.Culvertloadratingvariablesprovidedbypolicy...........................................................................................8
TableIV1.Culvertdimensionsrequiredforloadratingcalculations.........................................................................18
TableIV2.Modulusofsubgradereaction(kvalues)forLevel2model.....................................................................20
TableIV3.ModulusofelasticityforsoilforLevel3model........................................................................................21
TableIV4.Steelreinforcingvariables.........................................................................................................................23
TableIX1.Exampleculvert,generalinformation.......................................................................................................77
TableIX2.Exampleculvert,requireddimensions......................................................................................................78
TableIX3.Exampleculvert,structuralmaterialproperties........................................................................................80
TableIX4.Exampleculvertsoilparameters...............................................................................................................80
TableIX5.Exampleculvert,reinforcingsteelschedule..............................................................................................83
TableIX6.Exampleculvertsectionproperties...........................................................................................................86
TableIX7.Exampleculvertsectionpropertiescont...................................................................................................87
TableIX8.CULV5criticalsectionsfordemands........................................................................................................99
TableIX9.CULV5rawdemandsatcriticalsections.................................................................................................101
TableIX10.CULV5demandsforTotalLoadCase....................................................................................................103
TableIX11.CULV5demandforthereducedlateralloadcase.................................................................................104
TableIX12.CULV5totalloadcaseratingfactorcalculations...................................................................................106
TableIX13.CULV5reducedlateralloadcaseratingfactors.....................................................................................107
TableIX14.RISA2Dloads.........................................................................................................................................110
TableIX15.Springsupportscalculations..................................................................................................................113
TableIX16.RISA2Dtotalloadcasedemands..........................................................................................................125
TableIX17.RISA2Dreducedlateralloadcasedemands.........................................................................................126
TableIX18.RISA2Dtotalloadcaseratingfactorcalculations.................................................................................128
TableIX19.RISA2Dreducedlateralloadcaseratingfactors..................................................................................129
TableIX20.RISA2DwithLEFEliveloadcalculations...............................................................................................140
TableIX21.RISA2DwithLEFEdemands..................................................................................................................144
TableIX22.RISA2DwithLEFEloadrating................................................................................................................146

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

LISTOFEQUATIONS
EquationII1.Theratingfactorequation(MCEB6.5.1eq.61a)...................................................................................9
EquationII2.Theloadratingequation(MCEB6.5.1eq.61b):.....................................................................................9
EquationV1.Centroidofthesectionatultimatecapacity(derivedforSSHB8.16.3.4)............................................26
EquationV2.Stressinthecompressionsteel(psi)(derivedforSSHB8.16.3.4)........................................................26
EquationV3.Stressincompressionsteelatbalancedsteel(SSHB8.16.3.4.3eq.828).............................................27
EquationV4.Rhobalancedfordoublyreinforcedslabs(SSHB8.16.3.4.3eq827)....................................................27
EquationV5.Maximumreinforcingcheck(derivedfromSSHB8.16.3.1.1)...............................................................27
EquationV6.Generalizedmomentcapacity(derivedfromSSHB8.16).....................................................................28
EquationV7.Minimumcrackingmomentcapacity...................................................................................................28
EquationV8.Minimumshearcapacity(derivedfromSSHB8.16.6.7).......................................................................29
EquationV9.Shearcapacityequation(SSHB8.16.6.7.1eq.859)..............................................................................29
EquationV10.Thrustcapacity(SSHB8.16.4.2.1eq.831).........................................................................................30
EquationVI1.Thrustcontrollimit(SSHB8.16.4.3eq.837)........................................................................................32
EquationVI2.Verticaldeadload,DLv(ksf).................................................................................................................39
EquationVI3.Selfweightoftheculvert,SW(ksf).....................................................................................................39
EquationVI4.Horizontaldeadloadatthetopappliedtotheexteriorwallsoftheculvert,DLhT(ksf)......................39
EquationVI5.Horizontaldeadloadatthebottomappliedtotheexteriorwallsoftheculvert,DLhB(ksf)...............39
EquationVI6.Horizontalliveloadappliedtotheexteriorwalls,LLh(ksf)..................................................................40
EquationVI7.Verticalliveloadappliedtothetopslab,LLvT(ksf)..............................................................................41
EquationVI8.Verticalliveloadappliedtothebottomslab,LLvB(ksf).......................................................................42
EquationVI9.TotalLoadCase...................................................................................................................................48
EquationVI10.ReducedLateralLoadCase...............................................................................................................48
EquationVI11.Springconstantequation...................................................................................................................50
EquationVI12.VerticalliveloadappliedtothetopsoilmassforLevel3analysis,LLvT(klf).....................................62
EquationIX1.Areaofreinforcingsteel.......................................................................................................................81

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

xi

TxDOT

I.

CulvertRatingGuide

INTRODUCTION
A. PURPOSE
ThepurposeofthisCulvertRatingGuideistopresentaclear,repeatableandvalidprocedureforTexas
DepartmentofTransportation(TxDOT)engineersandtheirconsultantstouseforloadratingculvertsintheTxDOT
roadwaysystem.
TheAmericanAssociationofStateHighwayandTransportationOfficials(AASHTO)definesloadratingasthe
maximumtrucktractortonnage,expressedintermsofHSloaddesignation,permittedacrossabridge[culvert].
TheloadratingisexpressedintermsoftwoseparateratingsanInventoryRatingandanOperatingRating.The
InventoryRating(IR)isthemaximumtruckloadthatcansafelyutilizethebridge[orculvert]foranindefinite
periodoftime(AASHTO,2003;TxDOT,2002).TheOperatingRating(OR)istheabsolutemaximumpermissible
truckloadthatmayusethebridge[culvert].Loadratingsarebasedontheculvertscurrentconditionandare
determinedthroughanalysisandengineeringjudgmentbycomparingtheculvertstructurescapacityanddead
loaddemandtoliveloaddemand.

B. TXDOTSCULVERTDESIGNHISTORY
CulvertdesignhasevolvedthroughoutTxDOTshistory.TxDOTarchivesrevealfourerasofculvertdesign,
eachrepresentingsubstantivelydifferentdesignapproaches.Thesearethe1938era,the1946era,the1958era,
andthe2003era.
Culvertdesignsfromthe1938eraweredesignedusingslightlyunconservativeearthloads,lowertruckloads,
butoverlyconservativeconcreteconstructionthatresultedinverydurableculverts.The1938collectionconsists
of428differentculvertdesignsrepresentingadiverserangeofspanlengths,numberofspans,andbarrelheights.
Filldepthstypicallyrangefrom0to6feet.
Duringthemid1940s,principallywhentheFarmtoMarketroadsystemwasbeingconstructed,newculvert
designs(59total)wereaddedtothebodyof1938designs.The1946eraculvertswereissuedundertheless
conservativestructuralcodesoftheTexasHighwayDepartmentSupplementNo.1.Thesedesignsresultedin
culvertswhichgenerallyperformwell,butwhicharenotasrobustasculvertsdesignedpercurrentAASHTO
standards.
In1958,coincidentwiththeadventoftheInterstateHighwaySystem,TxDOTredesignedandreissuedtheir
fullsetofculvertconstructiondrawings.The1958setconsistsof380designsrepresentingadiverserangeofspan
lengths,numberofspans,andbarrelheights,withfilldepthsfrom0to6feet.The1958eradesignsuseslightly
lessconservativesoilloadsbutmoreconservativestructuralconsiderationsandHS20truckloads.
Themostrecenteraofculvertdesignsdatesfrom2003.OnceagainTxDOTredesigned,expanded,and
reissuedtheircompletesetofculvertconstructiondrawings.The2003setconsistsof610culvertdesigns,
includingnewdesignsfordeepfillculvertswithfillheightsupto23feet.Culvertdesignsforthe2003eraare
basedoncurrentAASHTOpolicy.
Althoughaculvertisonlyconstructedonetime,culvertinspectionandratingisanongoingactivitywhich
occursperiodicallythroughouttheculvertsservicelife.Duetothehistoricaldifferencesandevolutioninculvert
design,itisnecessarytoarticulateauniformloadratingprocedureconsistentwithcurrentAASHTOpolicyand
whichconsidersthefactthatmostofTxDOTsculvertshavebeenperformingadequatelyacrossthedesign
generations.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

C. SCOPE
ThisCulvertRatingGuidefocusesonreinforcedconcreteboxculverts,thisbeingtheculverttypemost
frequentlyusedbyTxDOT.TheGuideiswrittentofacilitateloadratingforreinforcedconcreteboxculvertsfrom
anydesignera,foranynumberofspans,foranyculvertgeometry,andforanyrangeofbackfillheights.
Theproceduresdescribedhereinspecificallyapplytoloadratinginserviceculvertswithdrainedbackfill
conditions.Itisassumedthatculvertswhicharebeingloadratedwillhavehadavisualinspectiontoestablishthe
conditionratingoftheculvert.
ThisGuideincludeslimitedinformationaboutloadratingforalternativeculvertstructureswithrespectto
shape(circularpipe,arch,etc.),material(aluminum,plastic,steel,etc.),backfilltype,anddrainage.

D. RATINGPHILOSOPHY
Loadratingsaredeterminedbycomparingtheculvertcapacityanddeadloaddemandtotheliveload
demand.Thus,theculvertloadratingisstronglydependentonhowculvertcapacity,culvertdeadload,and
culvertliveloadareestablished.
Typicalpracticeistodetermineculvertcapacitybasedonthedetailsfoundontheoriginalconstruction
documentsincombinationwithhistoricalmaterialpropertyassumptionswhicharecorrelatedbyvisualinspection
oftheculvertcondition.Thedeadandliveloaddemandsonthestructurearedeterminedbyanalyticalmodeling.
Thismeansthattheculvertloadratingprocessrequiresengineeringdecisionsaboutmodelingpracticesand
procedures,aswellastheknowledgeableevaluationandselectionofnumerousdesignvariables.
TxDOTpolicyprovidesguidanceformanyaspectsofculvertloadrating.Theofficialpolicyconcerningculvert
loadratingusedbyTxDOTisembodiedintheAASHTOStandardSpecificationforHighwayBridges17thEdition
(SSHB)(AASHTO,2002),andtheAASHTOManualforConditionEvaluationofBridges(MCEB)(AASHTO,2003).
Otheraspectsoftheculvertloadratingprocessarenotdirectlyaddressedbypolicy,oneexamplebeing
selectionoftheanalyticalmodelfordeterminingdeadloadandliveloaddemand.Modelingcanbeapproachedin
manyways,witheachanalyticalmethodrequiringitsowndegreeofeffortandyieldingresultsthatpredictactual
loaddemandswithvaryingdegreesofaccuracy.
Recognizingtherangeofapproachesavailableforculvertmodeling,topromoteefficiencythisGuideidentifies
fouranalyticalmodelsofincreasingcomplexityandsophistication.Thefirstlevelisaquickcalculationusinga
stylizedtwodimensionalframemodel.Thesecondlevelusesatraditionaltwodimensionalframemodelwiththe
culvertstructuresupportedbysoilsprings.Thethirdlevelusesatwodimensionalfiniteelementmodelthat
considerssoilstructureinteractioneffects.Thatis,thesoilsurroundingtheculvertstructureismodeledwithfinite
elements.Withtheguidancepresentedhereinandanappropriatesoftwarepackage,anystructuralengineer
shouldbeabletoconfidentlyloadrateaculvertusingthefirstthreelevels.
Thefourthlevelisthegeneralcase.Here,applicationsareopenendedandhighlyprojectspecific,anduseis
restrictedtoresearchorspecializedapplications.Level4assumestheuseofmorecomplex,twoorthree
dimensionalfiniteelementmodelswithsoilstructureinteraction.Theselectionofmodelingapproach,model
details,andratingparameterswillbeindividualizedandlargelylefttothediscretionoftheengineerratingthe
culvert.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

E. ABOUTTHISGUIDE
ItistheintentofthisCulvertRatingGuidetoassemble,summarizeandclarifythenecessaryinformationfor
culvertloadrating,boththatportionspecificallyaddressedbypolicyandthatportionwhichisnot,foreachofthe
fourlevelsofanalysis.Thechaptersareasfollows:
ChapterIprovidesanintroductionandbackgroundtoculvertloadratingatTxDOT.
ChapterIIisdevotedtoculvertratingpolicy.Thischapteridentifiesthegoverningpolicyassociatedwith
culvertloadrating,andsummarizesapplicablepolicyguidance.
ChapterIIIoutlinestheculvertratingprocedure.Whereasthefirsttwochaptersprovidepertinent
backgroundinformation,thischapterlaysouthowculvertsshouldbeloadratedatTxDOT.Thisincludesaflow
chartwhichsummarizestheculvertratingprocess.
ChapterIVpresentstheinitialstepforloadratingaculvert.Beginningwithculvertplans,constructiondetails,
andrelateddocumentation,thischaptershowshowtoobtainthenecessarydimensionalandmaterialproperty
dataneededforculvertloadrating.
ChapterVdiscussesculvertcapacitycalculations.Forculvertloadrating,capacityisbasedonequationsand
approachesspecifiedinAASHTOpolicy.Thischapterpresentsboththepolicyandastraightforwardapproachfor
determiningculvertcapacitytofacilitatetheloadratingcalculation.
ChapterVIpresentstheLevel1,Level2,andLevel3analyticalmodelingapproachesrecommendedfor
determiningdemandloadsassociatedwithculvertloadrating.Thediscussionaddressestheassumptions
associatedwitheachmodelinglevel,specificationoftheanalyticalmodel,assigningboundaryconditions,and
definingandapplyingdeadloadandliveloads.Thischapteralsodiscussesavailablestructuralanalysissoftware
packages,andidentifiesthemostcommonsoftwarepackageusedinTxDOTforeachlevel.Finally,thischapter
presentsadetailed,stepbystepprocedureforcalculatingdemandloadsusingtherepresentativesoftware
package.
ChapterVIIdiscussesLevel4modeling.Thisincludesgeneralizedguidanceaboutapplications,modeling
approaches,softwareselection,andanalyticalprocedures.
ChapterVIIIdiscusseslimitationsassociatedwithuseofthisGuide.Theseincludeculverttype,deepfill
culverts,submergedculverts,saturatedsoilsandbackfillsoilmodulusvalues.
ThisGuideincludessixappendices.AppendixApresentsanexampleofhowtoaccomplishthefirststepin
culvertrating;thatis,obtainingthestructuralratingparametersfromthedesigndrawings.AppendixBcontinues
thisexample,explaininghowtocalculatetheculvertcapacity.AppendicesCthroughEcontinuetheexampleby
presentinghowtoperformdemandloadcalculationsandculvertloadratingbasedonLevel1,Level2,andLevel3
modelingapproaches.AppendixFpresentsthepolicysourcedocumentsforculvertloadrating.

TxDOT

II.

CulvertRatingGuide

POLICYREQUIREMENTS
A. POLICYSOURCEDOCUMENTS
Asnoted,twodocumentspresentTxDOTsofficialpolicyforculvertloadrating.Theseare:

AASHTOStandardSpecificationforHighwayBridges17thEdition(SSHB)
AASHTOManualforConditionEvaluationofBridges(MCEB)

(AASHTO,2002)
(AASHTO,2003)

AASHTOsSSHBprovidesguidanceforbasicratingparametersincludingdeadandliveloadvaluesanddistributions
andstrengthreductionfactors.AASHTOsMCEBprovidestheactualratingequations,loadfactorsandmaterial
propertyassumptions.Thepoliciesdonotprovidedirectguidanceforanalyticalmodeling.
TxDOThaspublishedtwootherdocumentswhichrefertoculvertdesignandrating.Thesedocumentsare:

TxDOTBridgeDesignManual
TxDOTBridgeInspectionManual

(TxDOT,2001)
(TxDOT,2002)

ThesedocumentsprovideculvertratinganddesignguidancethatdiffersslightlyfromtheAASHTOspecifications.
ItisTxDOTspolicytosatisfythecurrentAASHTOrequirements.Therefore,theTxDOTpublicationsshouldbe
referencedonlyforhistoricalinterestandclaritywhiletheAASHTOstandardsshouldberelieduponforofficial
policy.AppendixFcontainsscansoftheactualpolicydocuments.
ThefollowingsectionsofthisdocumentoutlineandinterprettheAASHTOpolicyrequirementsforculvertload
ratingatTxDOT.

B. FAILUREMODES
TheAASHTOSSHB,Section8,definesthreepotentialfailuremodesforculvertstructuralmembers.Theseare
bendingmoment(orflexure),shear,andaxialthrust.Culvertloadratingcalculationsmustconsiderallthree
failuremodes,thoughtypically,bendingmomentisthecontrollingcase.

C. CRITICALSECTIONS
Culvertscanbemodeledintwodimensionsbytakingaoneunitwideslicenormaltotheculvertflowlineas
showninFigureII1.Severalcrosssectionsfromthisslicemustbeanalyzedforbothcapacityanddemandinorder
toestablishtheloadratingforaculvertstructure.Multipleloadratingsmustbecalculated,withthelowestload
ratingfromallcrosssectionsbecomingtheculvertloadrating.

traffic directions

flowline

b = 12 in. cross-section
FIGUREII.1.THREEDIMENSIONALVIEWOFACULVERTINDICATINGTWODIMENSIONALSTRIP.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

Experiencesuggeststhatthecontrollinglocationforculvertloadrating,knownasthecriticalsections,will
typicallybeeithernearmidspanoratacorneroftheculvertstructure.AccordingtotheSSHBSection16.6.4.5,
thecornercapacityanddemandformomentmaybetakenattheintersectionofthehaunchanduniformdepth
member(AASHTO,2002).Inthecaseofculvertswithouthaunches,itistakenatthefaceofthewallsection.
FigureII2summarizesthecriticalsectionlocationsforculvertloadratingforculvertswithouthaunches(Figure
II2.A)andculvertswithhaunches(FigureII2.B).
TEC

TEM

TIC

WTEC

WTIC

WEM

WIM

WBEC

WBIC

BEC

BEM

BIC

FIGUREII.2.A.MOMENTCRITICALSECTIONSFORCULVERTSWITHOUTHAUNCHES.

TEC

TEM

TIC

WTEC

WTIC

WEM

WIM

WBEC

WBIC

BEC

BEM

BIC

FIGUREII2.B.MOMENTCRITICALSECTIONSFORCULVERTSWITHHAUNCHES.

AbbreviationsforthetypicalcriticalsectionsshowninFigureII2,listedclockwise,are:topexteriorcorner(TEC),
topexteriormidspan(TEM),topinteriorcorner(TIC),topinteriormidspan(TIM),walltopinteriorcorner(WTIC),
wallinteriormidspan(WIM),wallbottominteriorcorner(WBIC),bottominteriormidspan(BIM),bottominterior
corner(BIC),bottomexteriormidspan(BEM),bottomexteriorcorner(BEC),wallbottomexteriorcorner(WBEC),
wallexteriormidspan(WEM),andwalltopexteriorcorner(WTEC).Formultiplespanboxculverts,thesections
aredesignatedaspertheculvertspan;e.g.,TIC1,TIC2,BIC1,BIC2,etc.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

Themidspancapacityanddemandmay,forconvenience,betakenatmidspanforbothtopandbottomslabs
andverticalwalls.Technically,theanalysisshouldidentifytheactuallocationswiththehighestdemand,butthe
errorintroducedbyassumingthemidspanlocationisnotsignificant.
Also,itisimportanttonotethatthecornercriticalsectionsshowninFigureII2correspondtodesired
locationsforthecalculationofbendingmomentcapacityanddemand,asopposedtoshear.Ashasbeennoted,
bendingmomentisthemostcommoncontrollingfailuremodeforculvertloadrating,soitisstandardpracticeto
usethemomentcriticalsectionsforallthreepotentialfailuremodes(moment,shear,axial),atleastinitially.This
isaconservativeapproachwhenbendingmomentcontrolstherating,anditrequirestheleastamountofeffort.
However,shearsometimescontrolsorappearstocontroltheloadrating.SectionVI.Cexplicitlydiscussesthe
situationwhereshearappearstocontroltheloadrating,andprovidesAASHTOpolicyguidanceonhowtoevaluate
shearcapacityanddemandinthatinstance.

D. LOADCASES
TheAASHTOSSHB,Section3.20.2,requiresthattwodemandanalysesmustbemadetodeterminetheworstcase
loadingconditionfortheculvertstructure.Thesearethetotalloadcaseandthereducedlateralloadcase.
Thetotalloadcaseisdesignedtogeneratethemaximumshearandaxialdemandsinthewholeculvertandthe
maximummomentdemandsinallbutthetopandbottommidspans.Thereducedlateralloadcaseisintendedto
generatethemaximummomentdemandsinthetopandbottommidspans.Theloadraterdefinestheseload
casesbycombiningbasicdeadandliveloadsdifferently.SectionVI.D.5,providesdetailedguidanceaboutthese
loadcases.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

E. RATINGVARIABLES
AASHTOpolicydocumentsprovideratingparametersinadditiontolocationofthecriticalsections.TableII1
summarizesthebasicratingvariablesspecifiedbypolicy.Thesevariablesprovideguidanceforeitherthedemand
orthecapacitycalculations.

TABLEII1.CULVERTLOADRATINGVARIABLESPROVIDEDBYPOLICY

Description

Value

DemandVariables
LiveLoad
ImpactFactor

ReductioninLoadIntensity
NearStructureLateralLiveLoad
VerticalEarthPressure
LateralEarthPressureCornerMoment
LateralEarthPressurePositiveMoment
LiveLoadDistributiontotheTopSlab
(filldepth,D<2)
LiveLoadDistributiontotheTopSlab
(filldepth,D>2)
LiveLoadDistributiontotheBottomSlab
CapacityVariables
ShearStrengthReductionFactor
FlexureandThrustStrengthReductionFactor
AssumedConcreteStrength,fc

AssumedReinforcingSteelStrength,Fy

Where:
Disthedepthoffill
IMistheimpactfactor
LListheliveload.

HS20
0<D<1
IM=30%
1<D<2
IM=20%
2<D<3
IM=10%
3<D
IM=0%
1or2lanes
100% ofLL
3lanes
90%ofLL
4lanes
75%ofLL
additional2 feet ofsurcharge
tolateralload
Calculatebasedontotalunitweight
forsoilof120pcf
Calculatebasedonequivalentfluid
weightforsoilof60pcf
Calculatebasedonequivalentfluid
weightforsoilof30pcf
directcontact

=.85
=.9
Pre1954
Post1954
Pre1954
StructuralGr.
Gr.40
Gr.50
Gr.60

SSHB3.7.6
SSHB3.8.2.3

SSHB3.12.1
SSHB3.20.3
SSHB6.2.1.B
SSHB6.2.1.B
SSHB6.2.1.B,3.20.2
SSHB6.4

wheelload distributedovera
square1.75Dtoaside;overlapping
areasareaveraged
wheelloaddistributedovera
rectangle1.75Dby1.75D+2H

PolicySection

SSHB6.4
SSHB16.6.4.3
SSHB16.6.4.6
SSHB16.6.4.6

2,500psi
3,000psi
33ksi
36ksi
40ksi
50ksi
60ksi

MCEB6.6.2.4

MCEB6.6.3.2

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

F. RATINGEQUATIONS
TheequationswhichdeterminetheloadratingandculvertcapacityareprovidedbytheAASHTOpolicy.
WithintheAASHTOpolicy,culvertsareconsideredasasubsetofbridgesandarethereforeloadratedasasubset
ofbridgeloadrating.
TheAASHTOMCEBprovidestheactualloadratingequations.TheratingfactoridentifiedinEquationII1is
thecentralelementoftheculvertloadratingprocess.Thisratingfactoristheratioofthestructuralcapacity
minusthedeadloaddemandtotheliveloaddemand.
EquationII1isusedtodeterminetheratingfactorateachcriticalsectionasidentifiedinFigureII2foreach
potentialfailuremode(moment,shearandthrust),foreachloadcase(totalandreducedlateral),ateachrating
level(inventoryandoperating).Thelowestinventoryratingfactorandthelowestoperatingratingfactorcontrol
theloadratingfortheculvert.

EQUATIONII1.THERATINGFACTOREQUATION(MCEB6.5.1EQ.61A).

where: RF=theratingfactor
C = thestructuralcapacityofthemember
D= thedeadloadeffectonthemember
L = theliveloadeffectonthemember
I = theimpactfactor,IMfromSSHB3.8.2.3
A1= 1.3=factorfordeadloads,fromMCEB6.5.3
A2= 2.17forInventoryLevel=factorforliveloads,fromMCEB6.5.3
= 1.3forOperatingLevel=factorforliveloads,fromMCEB6.5.3

Oncethecontrolling(lowest)ratingfactorsfortheinventoryandoperatingconditionsarecalculated,the
inventoryandoperatingloadratingcanbedeterminedbymultiplyingtheratingfactorbytheHSratingtruck
tractortonnageasseeninEquationII2:

EQUATIONII2.THELOADRATINGEQUATION(MCEB6.5.1EQ.61B):

where: RT=theloadratingintermsofanHStrucktonnage
RF=theratingfactorfromEquationII1
W= theHStrucktractortonnage;forHS20,W=20tons

NotethatthevariablesusedinEquationII2arespecifictoHSloadingaspercustomaryTxDOTpractice.This
meansthattheloadrating(RT)willbeexpressedintermsofanHSdesignationratherthanthegrossweightofthe
vehicle.

TxDOT

III.

CulvertRatingGuide

11

CULVERTLOADRATINGPROCEDURE
A. CONTEXTFORLOADRATING
ThetypicalsituationsatTxDOTforwhichitbecomesnecessarytoloadrateaculvertare:

Theculvertfailsvisualinspectionduringthebiannualbridgeinspectioncycle.Thismeanstheculvert
receivesaConditionRatingof5orlessasdescribedintheTxDOTBridgeInspectionManual(TxDOT
2002).
Theculvertneedstobelengthenedorotherwisemodifiedaspartofaroadrehabilitation/
constructionproject.
Theculverthasstructurallydeterioratedsinceitspreviousinspection.
Theculverthasbeenstructurallydamagedduetovehicularimpact.
Itisdesirabletoincreasetheoperatingrating(OR)oftheculverttonegatetherequirementforload
posting.

LoadpostingisdefinedinChapter5oftheTxDOTBridgeInspectionManual(TxDOT2002)andconsistsof
placingsignagebythestructureindicatingthelargesttruckthatmaybepermittedacrossthestructure.The
followingflowchartfromtheBridgeInspectionManualdefinestheculvertloadpostingprocess.Culvertsmaybe
loadpostedattheoperatingratingiftheculvertconditionratingisgreaterthanthatdefinedintheflowchart.
Otherwisetheculvertmustbeloadpostedattheinventoryrating.

FIGUREIII.1.LOADPOSTINGGUIDELINES(TXDOTBRIDGEINSPECTIONMANUALFIG.53).

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

12

B. VISUALINSPECTIONOFTHECULVERT
Theculvertloadratingprocessisacomponentoftheinspectionprocessandconsistsofdeterminingthesafe
loadcarryingcapacityoftheculvertstructure,determiningwhetherspecificlegaloroverweightvehiclescansafely
crosstheculvert,anddeterminingiftheculvertneedstoberestrictedandwhatlevelofpostingisrequired.
TheTxDOTBridgeInspectionManual(TxDOT2002),Section3.8.8oftheMCEB(AASHTO2003),andSection9.0
oftheFHWACulvertInspectionManual(FHWA,1986)providespecificguidanceforperformingcondition
evaluationsofcastinplaceconcreteboxculverts.Thetypicaltypesofdistresstocheckforincludeverticaland
horizontalmisalignmentoftheculvertbarrel,jointdefects,cracksandspalls,concretedurability,andfooting
instability.
Section6.5.4oftheMCEBspecificallyaddressestherelationshipbetweenfieldinspectionandtheloadrating
andnotesthattheconditionandextentofdeteriorationofstructuralcomponentsofthebridge[culvert]should
beconsideredinthecomputationofcapacitywhenforceormomentischosenforuseinthebasicrating
equation.Anydiscrepanciesfromplan,orexcessivedistresssuchasthinsections,spalling,cracking,deflection,
exposedreinforcingsteel,andotheritemswhichmayaffectstructuralcapacity,shouldbenotedandconsidered
whenestablishingactualsectioncapacities.

C. THECULVERTLOADRATINGPROCESS
Thebasicloadratingprocedureisasfollows.PerEquationII1,themainvariablesareculvertcapacity,the
deadloaddemand,andliveloaddemand.CulvertcapacityisestablishedfromequationssetforthinAASHTO
policy,whereasdeadloadandliveloaddemandsmustbedeterminedbystructuralmodeling(computeranalyses).
Whilethisseemssimpleenough,thechallengeistoobtainreliablevaluesforeachofthesevariables.
Thecomplexityinherentintheloadratingprocessbecomesapparentwhenoneconsidersthatrating
calculationsmustbeperformedforeachpotentialfailuremode(moment,shear,andthrust),formultipleload
cases(totalandreducedlateral),foreachcriticalsectioninthemodel(12sectionsforasinglebarrelculvertto50
ormoresectionsformultiplespans),forbothinventoryandoperatingconditions.Theactualloadrating(IRand
OR)fortheculvertwillbetheminimumvaluesfromthesedifferentsetsofcalculations.Thismeansthattoload
rateaonebarrelboxculvertthesimplesttypetheloadraterwillcreateatleastonecomputermodel,conduct
fourseparatecomputeranalysesbasedonthismodel,interpretthousandsofdatapoints,andperformnofewer
than144setsofloadratingcalculations.
Aroadmapoftheculvertratingprocesshelpsavoidconfusion.FigureIII2presentstheloadratingprocess
intermsofaflowchart.Thefirststepistoidentifytheculvertthatwillbeloadrated.Asnoted,thismightbe
becausetheculvertfailedascheduledinspectionorforsomeotherreason.Eitherway,avisualinspectionofthe
culvertisnecessary.Forallintentsandpurposes,theculvertloadratingprocessbeginshere.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

13

Identify culvert for


load rating
Perform visual
inspection to
establish culvert
condition

CAPACITY

Perform Inventory and Operating


rating factor calculations

DEMAND

Select demand
modeling level

CulvertCapacity
Calculations

Establish parameters for


capacity calculations:
section dimensions,
material properties,
areas of reinforcing

Determine culvert
capacity for each
critical section

LEVEL1

LEVEL2

LEVEL3

Establish parameters for


demand calculations:
material properties, soil
unit weight, truck loads

Establish parameters for


demand calculations:
material properties, soil
stiffness, truck loads

Establish parameters for


demand calculations:
material properties, soil
modulus, truck loads

Create analytical
model: define
boundary
conditions, identify
critical sections,
apply loads,
establish load cases

Create analytical
model: define
boundary
conditions, identify
critical sections,
apply loads,
establish load cases

Create analytical
model: define
boundary
conditions, identify
critical sections,
apply loads,
establish load cases

Determine dead and


live load demands
(moment, shear and
thrust) for each
critical section, for
each load case.

Determine dead and


live load demands
(moment, shear and
thrust) for each
critical section, for
each load case.

Determine dead and


live load demands
(moment, shear and
thrust) for each
critical section, for
each load case.

Calculate Inventory and


Operating rating factors for
each critical section, for each
demand type, for each load
Identify the controlling
(minimum) Inventory and
Operating rating factors

Select the minimum


rating factors for
Inventory and
Operating levels

IfIRF<1,selecthigherlevelmodel

IfIRF>1
Multiply rating factors by
tractor tonnage to obtain the
Inventory Rating and
Operating Rating
FIGUREIII.2.FLOWCHARTDEPICTINGTHETXDOTCULVERTLOADRATINGPROCESS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

14

Theloadratingfactorcalculationsrequiredeterminationofbothculvertcapacityanddeadandliveload
demands.Itishelpful,therefore,tothinkofculvertcapacityanddemandsasseparateanddistinctaspectsofthe
loadratingprocess.
CapacitycalculationsarebasedonequationsestablishedinAASHTOpolicy(seeChapterV).Thesedonot
requireacomputermodelandareindependentofthelevelofanalysisselectedfordemandcalculations.Inputs
forcapacitycalculationsareobtainedfromtheconstructiondrawings,visualinspection,andAASHTOpolicyand
consistofstrengthpropertiesforconcreteandsteel,culvertsectiondimensions,andthelocationandamountof
reinforcingsteel.Thecalculationsdeterminemoment,shearandthrustcapacityforeachcriticalsectionofthe
culvertstructure.
Determinationofdeadandliveloaddemandsdorequirecomputermodeling.Thusthefirstdecisiontobe
madeistoselectthetypeofanalyticalmodelfortheloadratingprocess.ThisGuidedescribesthreelevelsof
analysis,eachwithincreasinganalyticalsophistication.Atradeoffexistsbetweensophisticationofanalysisand
requiredworkeffort.Theadvancedmodelsrequiremoreworkbuttypicallyyieldmoreaccurateresults.Further
commentsaboutthehierarchyofanalysesarepresentedbelow.
Oncethelevelofanalysisischosen,itisnecessarytogatherdatatofacilitatecreationoftheanalyticalmodel.
AsdiscussedinChapterIVofthisGuide,modelingparametersincludebutarenotlimitedtoculvertdimensions,
propertiesoftheconcreteandreinforcingsteel,soilparameters,thelocationandamountofreinforcingsteel,and
culvertinstallationdetails.
Withthisinformation,theloadratercancreatetheanalytical(computer)modelfromwhichs/hewillobtain
demandmoments,shearsandthrusts(seeChapterVI).Thisinvolveslayingoutthemodel,specifyingboundary
conditions,identifyingcriticalsections,applyingloads,anddefiningloadcases.
Determiningtheinventoryandoperatingloadratingfactorsrequiresmultiplesetsofcalculationsfromthe
computermodel.Thisisbecausedemandloadsandtheircorrespondingcapacitymustbedeterminedforeach
criticalsection,foreachfailuremode,andformultipleloadcases.Fromthesesetsofcalculations,theloadrater
selectsthecontrolling(minimum)operatingandinventoryratingfactorforeachcriticalsection,foreachloadcase.
Theminimumoperatingandinventoryratingfactorsfromthecriticalsectionsaretheratingfactorsfortheculvert.
Adecisionisrequiredatthispoint.Iftheinventoryandoperatingratingfactorsaregreaterthan1.0,the
culvertwillnotrequireloadpostingasperSection5,Chapter5oftheTxDOTBridgeInspectionManual(2002).This
meansthattheculvertloadratingcanbecalculatedbymultiplyingtheratingfactorsbythetractortonnage(for
HS20trucks,thisis20tons)todeterminetheoperating(OR)andinventory(IR)loadratings.However,ifeither
theinventoryratingfactorortheoperatingratingfactorislessthan1.0,theculvertmayrequireloadposting.As
analternativetoposting,theloadratermayelecttoperformthecalculationsagain,usingahigherlevel(more
sophisticated)modelingapproach.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

15

D. SELECTIONOFTHEPROPERLEVELOFANALYSIS
ThisGuiderecognizesahierarchyofanalysisforthedemandcalculations.Thelevelofanalysischosenisa
tradeoffbetweensophisticationofanalysisandrequiredworkeffort.Thesimplermethodsarefrequently
selectedasafirstchoiceduetotheneedtoanalyzemanystructureswithlimitedresources.Whenthisanalysis
yieldssatisfactoryresults,thereisnoneedtouseamoresophisticatedmodel.Satisfactoryresultswouldbethe
establishmentofsafeloadcarryingcapacitythatdoesnotrequirepostingthestructureanddoesnotunduly
restricttheflowofpermittedoverweighttrucks.Amoresophisticatedanalysisisjustifiedtoavoidpostingthe
structureortoeaserestrictionsontheflowofpermittedoverweighttrucks.
Ofcourse,thegoaloftheloadratingprocessisnottoforceanyparticularculverttorate,butinsteadto
establishavalidloadratingfortheculvert.Thefactthatmoresophisticatedmodelstendtomoreaccuratelymodel
themoment,shearandthrustdemands,andthusyieldhigherratingfactors,cannotbepressedindefinitely.Load
ratingshouldreliablydepictactualorexpectedculvertperformance.Culvertswhichcannotsafelysupportdesign
trafficloadsshouldberatedaccordingly,andculvertswhicharenotperforminginamannerthatindicatesthey
cancarrydesigntrafficloadsshouldnotberatedasiftheycan.

E. REVIEWINGANDCHECKINGCALCULATIONS
Theloadratingprocessrecognizesabalancebetweensafetyandeconomics.Standardqualitycontrol
proceduresrequirethatbothinhouseandconsultantsloadratingresultsshouldbecheckedforaccuracy.
LoadratinganalysesmustbeperformedunderthedirectsupervisionofaLicensedProfessionalEngineerwho
isknowledgeableabouttheloadratingprocess.Wheneverpossible,theloadratershouldperformlonghand
checksofaportionofthecomputeranalysistosatisfytheloadraterthatthecomputeroutputisvalid.Itisof
utmostimportancethattheloadraterunderstandswhencomputerresultsarereasonable.Blindfaithinany
computerprogramshouldbeavoided.
Anindependentcheckoftheanalysisshouldbeperformed.Thecheckershouldverifyallinputdatafor
computerprograms,verifythatthesummaryofloadcapacityinformationaccuratelyreflectstheanalysis,andbe
satisfiedwiththeaccuracyandsuitabilityofthecomputeroutput.

TxDOT

IV.

CulvertRatingGuide

17

CULVERTDETAILS
A. OVERVIEW
Inpreparationfortheloadratingcalculationprocess,culvertspecificvariablesmustbeestablished.Itis
commonpracticeformostofthevariablestobetakendirectlyfromtheconstructiondocuments.Theseinclude
culvertdimensions,materialproperties,reinforcingschedulesandinstallationmethods.However,asnotedinthe
previouschapter,datafromtheconstructiondocumentsshouldbeconfirmedduringavisualinspectionofthe
culvert,andanydiscrepanciesfromtheconstructiondocumentsshouldbeaddressed.

B. UNITS
Itisappropriatetocommentonunits,bothformeasurementandanalysis.ConsistentwithTxDOTpractice,
thisGuidepresentsU.S.CustomaryUnitsthroughout.Grossculvertdimensionsincludingtheclearspan,clear
height,anddepthofcoversoilshouldbemeasuredinfeet.Culvertstructuraldimensions,wallthicknesses,etc.
shouldbemeasuredininches.Theunitsofmeasurementwillbetheunitsofanalysis.
Withrespecttomaterialproperties,concretestrengthsshouldbepresentedandanalyzedintermsofpounds
persquareinch(psi).Reinforcingsteelstrengthshouldbepresentedandanalyzedintermsofkipspersquareinch
(ksi).
Withrespecttoloads,soilunitweightisidentifiedintermsofpoundspercubicfoot(pcf)butanalyzedinkips
percubicfoot(kcf).Vehicleliveloadsarepresentedinkips,convertedtostressintermsofkipspersquarefoot
(ksf),andanalyzedinkipspersquarefoot(ksf).Spacingbetweenwheelloadsshouldbepresentedandanalyzedin
feet.
Outputdatafromtheanalyticalprograms(shear,moment,thrust)arepresentedintermsofkipsandfeet.

LoadratingsareexpressedintermsoftheHStractortonnage.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

18

C. DIMENSIONS
Theculvertdimensionsmustbecollectedfromtheconstructiondocumentsorestablishedbasedonfield
measurements.TherequireddimensionalinformationissummarizedinTableIV1andFigureIV1.Thesevalues
willbeadequatefordefiningthegrosssectionpropertiesforalllevelsofanalyticalmodeling.
TABLEIV1.CULVERTDIMENSIONSREQUIREDFORLOADRATINGCALCULATIONS

Dimension

Abbr. Units

numberofspans

coversoildepth

ft

clearspan

ft

clearheight

ft

exteriorwallthickness

TEW

in.

interiorwallthickness

TIW

in.

topslabthickness

TT

in.

bottomslabthickness

TB

in.

tophaunchdimension

FT

in.

bottomhaunchdimension

FB

in.

D (ft)
T T (in.)

FT (in.)

FT (in.)
S (ft)
TEW (in.)

T IW (in.)

H (ft)
FB (in.)

FB (in.)

T B (in.)
FIGUREIV.1.CULVERTDIMENSIONS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

19

D. MATERIAL(STRUCTURAL)PROPERTIES
Therequiredmaterialpropertiesaretheyieldstrengthsandmodulusofelasticityforconcreteandsteel.The
loadratershouldusethebest(i.e.,mostaccurate)materialpropertyinformationavailablefortheconstructed
culvert.
Intheabsenceofprojectspecificinformationfromdesignplansorasbuiltdrawings,thedefaultmaterial
properties,perpolicy,areshowninTableII1.
Mostofthetimeoriginalconstructiondocumentswillbeavailablewhichwillidentifythematerialproperties.
Itiscustomarytorelyonthisinformation.Insomecases,constructionrecordsincludingqualitycontroldatafor
concretewillbeavailable.Theloadratershouldusethebestavailableinformation.
Incertaincases,itmaybeappropriatetoobtainsamplesoftheactualculvertmaterialsanddetermine
materialpropertiesbasedonlaboratorytests.TxDOTtestprocedurespublishedintheDepartmentalMaterial
Specificationsspecifyhowsamplesshouldbetakenandhowthesetypesoftestsshouldbeperformed.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

20

E. SOILPARAMETERS
Soilparametersaffectingculvertloadratingprimarilyconsistoftheweightofsoilaroundtheculvertandthe
stiffnessofsoilusedtoprovidebearingandlateralsupporttotheculvertstructure.

1. SOILUNITWEIGHT
Regardlessoflevelofanalysis,soilweightisoneoftheappliedloadsfortheculvertloadingmodel.Inthecase
ofaLevel1analysis,itistheonlyrequiredsoilparameter.Theunitweightofsoilforculvertloadratinganalysesis
definedperAASHTOpolicyandpresentedinTableII1.Althoughitispossibletoconductageotechnical
explorationanddirectlymeasuretheunitweightofthesoilswhichareover,aroundandbeneaththeculvert,this
israrelydoneforculvertloadrating.RecommendedpracticeistousetheAASHTOvalueforsoilunitweight.

2. MODULUSOFSUBGRADEREACTION
TheLevel2analysismodelstheculvertasbeingsupportedbysoilsprings.Thesoilpropertyusedtodefine
thestiffnessofthesespringsisthemodulusofsubgradereaction,k.Thekvalueusedforanalysisshould
representthesoiluponwhichtheculvertisbuilt;thatis,thesoildirectlybeneaththeculvert.TableIV2provides
representativekvaluesforlow,medium,andhighstrengthsoil.Useofthistablerequiresatleastabasicidea
aboutthetypeofsoiluponwhichtheculvertwasconstructed,expressedintermsofsoilclassificationbyASTM,
AASHTO,orTxDOTmethods.
TABLEIV2.MODULUSOFSUBGRADEREACTION(KVALUES)FORLEVEL2MODEL.

SoilSupport
Description

Modulusof
Subgrade
Reaction,k(pci)

UnifiedSoil
Classification
(ASTMD2487)

AASHTOGroup
Classification
(AASHTOM145)

TexasTriaxial
Classification
(TEX117E)

Low:Finegrainedsoilsin
whichhighlyplasticsilt
andclaysizedparticles
predominate

75

CH,OH,MH,OL

A5,A6,A7,A8

>5.0

Medium:Sandsandsand
gravelmixtureswith
moderateamountsofsilts
andclay

150

CL,ML,SC,SP,SM

A3,A4

3.5to5.0

High:Gravelsandsand
gravelmixturesrelatively
freeofplasticfines

250

GW,GP,GM,GC,
SW

A1,A2

<3.5

(VanTil,1972;Bowles,1996;McCarthy,2002)

Typicalpracticeforculvertloadratingistoselectarepresentativevalueforkfromthetable,ortoestimatek
basedoncorrelationwithothersoilproperties.Publisheddatafromresearchstudiesofbeamsonelastic
foundationsindicatethatdemandmomentsarenotparticularlysensitivetothekvalue(Bowles,1996;McCarthy,
2002).ParametricanalysesonasampleofTxDOTsculvertdesignssupportthisview.Havingsaidthat,iftheload
raterfeelsitisnecessary,thekvalueforsoilssupportingtheculvertcanbedetermineddirectlybyperforminga

platebearingtestasperTestMethodTEX125E.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

21

3. SOILELASTICMODULUSANDPOISSONSRATIO
TheLevel3culvertloadratinganalysisaccountsforsoilstructureinteractioneffectsbymodelingsoilusing
linearelasticfiniteelements.Thesoilparametersusedtodefinethesefiniteelementsaretheelasticmodulus(i.e.,
Youngsmodulus)andPoissonsratio.
Giventhestiffnessofconcreteboxculverts,itisreasonabletoassumethatstructuredeflectionswillbevery
smallandsoildisplacementwillbecorrespondinglylimited,thustheappropriatenessofthelinearelastic
approach.Ofcourse,moresophisticatedlinearandnonlinearsoilconstitutivemodelsareavailableandcanbe
usedforspecializedapplications.ThesearediscussedinChapterVIIrelativetoLevel4analyses.ButforaLevel3
culvertratingcalculation,thePoissonsratioandelasticmodulusparametersaresufficient.

a. P OISON SRATIO
ThePoisonsratio,,forsoilrangesfrom0.10to0.50.Anacceptable,recommendedvalueis0.30.Parametric
analysesonasampleofTxDOTsculvertdesignssupporttheuseof0.3forPoissonsratio,withoneexception.
Inventoryratingsfordeepfillculverts(fillheightsgreaterthan6feet)withlargewallheights(greaterthan8feet)
aresensitivetoPoissonsratio.Fortheseconditions,itwouldbeappropriatetodeterminePoissonsratiobased
onknowledgeoftheactualsoilbackfilltype.Publisheddata(Bowles,1996)suggestthatclayeybackfillsoilsfor
deepfill/largewallheightculvertsshouldbemodeledusingaPoissonsratioof0.50,andsandybackfillsoilsfor
suchculvertsshouldbemodeledusingaPoissonsratioof0.30.

b. S OIL M ODULUSOF E LASTICITY


Theelasticmodulus,Esoil,shouldrepresentthesoilconditionsabovetheculvert(vertical),besidetheculvert
(lateral),andbelowtheculvert(bearing).Itispossibletomodeldifferentsoilzonesforeachoftheseareas,to
distinguishbetweennativesoilandbackfillsoil,andtointroduceotherrefinementswhendelineatingthesoil
model.Intheabsenceofaprojectspecificsubsurfacesoilprofileestablishingthesoilzones,theloadratermay
assumehomogenoussoilconditionsaroundtheculvertstructure.
TableIV3providesrepresentativeEsoilvaluesforlow,medium,andhighstrengthsoil.Itisemphasizedthat
modulusvaluesvarywidelyforagivensoiltypeandactualvaluesdependonfactorssuchasmoisturecontent,unit
weight,compressibility,stresslevel,etc.Useofthistablerequiresatleastabasicideaaboutthetypeofsoil,
expressedintermsofsoilclassificationbyASTM,AASHTO,orTxDOTmethods.
TABLEIV3.MODULUSOFELASTICITYFORSOILFORLEVEL3MODEL.

SoilSupport
Description

ElasticModulus
Esoil
(psi)

UnifiedSoil
Classification
(ASTMD2487)

AASHTOGroup
Classification
(AASHTOM145)

TexasTriaxial
Classification
(TEX117E)

Low:Finegrainedsoils
inwhichhighlyplastic
siltandclaysized
particlespredominate

Range:2,50025,000+
Typical:8,000

CH,OH,MH,OL

A5,A6,A7,A8

>5.0

Medium:Sandsand
sandgravelmixtures
withmoderate
amountsofsiltsand
clay

Range:5,00050,000+
Typical:20,000

CL,ML,SC,SP,SM

A3,A4

3.5to5.0

High:Gravelsand
sandgravelmixtures
relativelyfreeof
plasticfines

Range:10,00070,000+
Typical:36,000

GW,GP,GM,GC,
SW

A1,A2

<3.5

(NAVFAC,1986;VanTil,1972;Coduto,2001;Bowles,1996)

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

22

Sitespecificdeterminationofthesoilmodulusisdesirableforculvertloadratingapplications.Modulusvalues
forsoilsmaybeestimatedfromempiricalcorrelations,laboratorytestresultsonundisturbedspecimens,andfrom
resultsoffieldtests.LaboratoryteststhatmaybeusedtoestimatethesoilmodulusaretheCaliforniaBearing
Ratiotest,unconsolidatedundrainedtriaxialcompressiontest,ortheconsolidatedundrainedtriaxialcompression
tests.Fieldtestsincludethestaticconepenetrationtest(CPT),standardpenetrationtest(SPT),Texascone
penetrometer(TCP),dynamicconepenetrometer(DCP)test,fallingweightdeflectometer(FWD)test,andthe
pressuremetertest(PMT).
ParametricanalysesonasampleofTxDOTsculvertdesignsshowthattheculvertinventoryratingishighly
sensitivetothesoilmodulusvalueusedfordemandcalculations,especiallyfordeepfillculverts(fillheights
greaterthan6feet).Unfortunately,geotechnicalresearchstudiesassociatedwithbeamsonelasticfoundations
indicatethatsoilmodulusisdifficulttoexplicitlydetermine,withmodulusvaluesestablishedfromdifferenttest
methodsvaryingbyonetotwoordersofmagnitude.
Datafromaverylimitedculvertinstrumentationandfieldtestprogram(threeculvertshavingdifferenttypes
ofdrainedsoilbackfill)suggestthatTxDOTsculvertsaretypicallybackfilledwithonsitesoilexcavatedduringthe
culvertconstructionprocess.Superiorbackfillmaterialshouldnotbeassumedwithoutverification.Amongthe
approachesidentifiedabovetodeterminemodulus,datasuggestthatthefallingweightdeflectometer(FWD)
providesthemostreliableandrepeatablesoilmodulusvalues.Thedatasuggestthatthesoilmodulusvaluesin
TableIV3arereasonabletodefinethelinearelasticconstitutivemodelusedforLevel3culvertratinganalyses.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

23

F. REINFORCINGSTEELSCHEDULE
TableIV4identifytheculvertratingvariablesassociatedwithreinforcingsteelquantities.FigureIV2showsa
typicalcrosssectiontofurtherexplainthesedetails.Itiscustomarytodoatakeoffanddeterminetheamount
ofreinforcingsteeldirectlyfromtheconstructiondocuments.Thereinforcingsteelquantitiesmustbedetermined
foreachcrosssectionshowninFigureII2.Thiswillrequireanalyzingthebarschedulesonthedrawingstoexpress
barsizeandspacingintermsofareaofsteelperfootofculvert,normaltotheculvertcrosssection.
TABLEIV4.STEELREINFORCINGVARIABLES

Variable

Abbr.

Units

Areaoftensilesteelperfoot(normaltoculvertcrosssection)

As

in.2/ft

Areaofcompressionsteelperfoot(normaltoculvertcrosssection)

As

in.2/ft

Distancefromtheextremecompressionfibertothecentroidofthetensionreinforcement

in.

Distancefromtheextremetensionfibertothecentroidofthecompressionreinforcement

d'

in.

b=12"

A's

d
h
d'

As

FIGUREIV.2.TOPSLABCROSSSECTIONLABELEDFORPOSITIVEBENDING.

Itmayhappenthatconstructiondrawingsforaculvertarenotavailable.Or,morespecificinformationaboutthe
reinforcingsteelmayberequired.Ineithercase,bothnondestructiveanddestructivetestmethodscanbeused
toestablish/verifytheactualreinforcingsteelschedule.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

24

G. CULVERTINSTALLATIONMETHOD
ThetypicalapplicationrepresentedbythisGuideistoloadrateculvertsthathavebeeninserviceformany
years.Forthesetypesofculverts,itissafetoassumethatsoilstressesassociatedwithculvertinstallationare
dissipatedsuchthatconstructionandinstallationloadsnolongeraffecttherating.Thus,theculvertratingprocess
forolder,inserviceculvertsrequiresnoconsiderationoftheinstallationmethod.
Forrecentlyinstalledculverts(inserviceforlessthan,say,fiveyears),theinstallationmethodand
constructionprocesscansignificantlyimpactsoilstressesaroundtheculvertandthusaffecttheculvertload
rating.TheAASHTOMCEBSection16.6.4.2(AASHTO2003)discussesmodificationofearthloadsforsoilstructure
interactionandidentifiesthefollowingapproaches:

Embankmentinstallation
Trenchinstallation

CulvertloadratingparametersassociatedwiththeseinstallationmethodsshouldbeaddressedaspertheAASHTO
MCEB.

TxDOT

V.

CulvertRatingGuide

25

CULVERTCAPACITYCALCULATIONS
A. POLICYGUIDANCE
TheAASHTOSSHBprovidesequationstodeterminesectioncapacitiesforeachpotentialfailuremode;thatis,
bendingmoment,shear,andaxialthrust.Thesesectioncapacities,C,areusedinEquationII1whencalculating
theculvertratingfactors.SSHBSection8.16.3discussesflexuralcapacitycalculationsconsideringmaximum
reinforcinglimitsinthetermsofthebalancedreinforcementratio.Thecapacitydiscussionissplitbetweensingly
anddoublyreinforcedbeams.SSHBSection8.16.4providesguidelinesfordeterminingthethrustcapacity.SSHB
Section8.16.4.3inparticularprovidesanequationforcheckingthatthethrustloadissmallenoughtonotcontrol
overmoment.SSHBSection8.16.6.7providesacomplexequationfordeterminingtheshearcapacitybasedon
boththeshearandmomentdemands.Thisequationhasverysimpleupperandlowerlimitsthatmaybeused
whensheardoesnotcontrol.

B. SIGNCONVENTIONFORLOADRATINGCALCULATIONS
Thesignconventionthatwillbeusedthroughoutthisdocumentisthatthelayerofthesteelontheinsideof
theculvertisplacedintensionduringpositivebending,whiletheoutsidelayerofsteelisplacedinthetension
duringnegativebending.Statedanotherway,whenthetensionfaceisinsidetheculvert,bendingispositive.
Whenthetensionfaceisoutsidetheculvert,bendingisnegative.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

26

C. CULVERTCAPACITYCALCULATIONSFORCRITICALSECTIONS
ThissectionoftheGuidediscusseshowtoapplypolicytocalculatesectioncapacitiesaspartoftheloadrating
process.Thesectioncapacitymustbecalculatedforeachfailuremode(bendingmoment,shear,axialthrust)at
eachcriticalsectionoftheculvertdefinedinFigureII.Thegrosssectionpropertiesareusedtocalculatethe
capacityoftheculvertstructure.

1. BENDINGMOMENTCAPACITY
Bendingmomentcapacitymustbecalculatedineachbendingdirection;thatis,bothpositiveandnegative.
Bendingmomentcapacitymaybedeterminedusingthefollowingstepswhichhavebeenderivedtofollowthe
AASHTOprovisionsintheSSHB.Forreference,theSSHBequationnumberisshowninparenthesisintheequation
identifier.
CapacityStep1. DeterminethecentroidofthesectionatultimatecapacityusingEquationV1.
EQUATIONV1.CENTROIDOFTHESECTIONATULTIMATECAPACITY(DERIVEDFORSSHB8.16.3.4).

0.5

87,000

0.85
0.85

87,000

0.85
0.85

87,000
0.85

where: c = thecentroidofthesection(in.)
Fy= yieldstrengthofthereinforcement(psi)
fc= thecompressivestrengthofconcrete(psi)
As= areaofthetensionreinforcement(in.2)
As=areaofthecompressionreinforcement(in.2)
d= distancefromtheextremecompressionfibertothecentroidofthecompression
reinforcement(in.)
b = widthofthecompressionfacemember(typically12inches)
= 0.85when
4,000psi
. 0005 when4,000psi
8,000psi
= 1.05
8,000psi fromSSHB8.16.2.7
= 0.65when
CapacityStep2. CalculatethestressinthecompressionsteelusingEquationV2.
EQUATIONV2.STRESSINTHECOMPRESSIONSTEEL(PSI)(DERIVEDFORSSHB8.16.3.4).

87,000

F
c
where: = thestressinthecompressionsteel(psi)
Fy= yieldstrengthofthereinforcement(psi)
c = thecentroidofthesection(in.)
d= distancefromtheextremecompressionfibertothecentroidofthecompression
reinforcement(in.)

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

27

CapacityStep3. CalculatethebalancedstressinthecompressionsteelusingEquationV3.However,if
F equalszero(establishedfromCapacityStep2)thenF equalszeroandtheloadratermayproceed
toCapacityStep4.
EQUATIONV3.STRESSINCOMPRESSIONSTEELATBALANCEDSTEEL(SSHB8.16.3.4.3EQ.828).

87,000
87,000

87,000 1

where: F =thestressinthecompressionsteel(psi)
Fy= yieldstrengthofthereinforcement(psi)
c = thecentroidofthesection(in.)
d = distancefromtheextremecompressionfibertothecentroidofthetension
reinforcement(in.)
d= distancefromtheextremecompressionfibertothecentroidofthecompression
reinforcement(in.)
0thenF
0
IfF
CapacityStep4. CalculatethebalancedsteelratiousingEquationV4.
EQUATIONV4.RHOBALANCEDFORDOUBLYREINFORCEDSLABS(SSHB8.16.3.4.3EQ827).

0.85
where:

87,000
87,000

=thebalancedratiooftensilereinforcement
fc= thecompressivestrengthofconcrete(psi)
Fy= yieldstrengthofthereinforcement(psi)
F =thestressinthecompressionsteel(psi)
As=areaofthecompressionreinforcement(in.2)
d = distancefromtheextremecompressionfibertothecentroidofthetension
reinforcement(in.)
b = widthofthecompressionfacemember(typically12inches)
= 0.85when
4,000psi
. 0005 when4,000psi
8,000psi
= 1.05
8,000psi fromSSHB8.16.2.7
= 0.65when

CapacityStep5. CheckthebalancedsteelratiousingEquationV5.
EQUATIONV5.MAXIMUMREINFORCINGCHECK(DERIVEDFROMSSHB8.16.3.1.1).

0.75

where: = theratiooftensilereinforcement
As= areaofthetensionreinforcement(in.2)
b = widthofthecompressionfacemember(typically12inches)
d = distancefromtheextremecompressionfibertothecentroidofthetension
reinforcement(in.)
=thebalancedratiooftensilereinforcementperEquationV4

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

28

CapacityStep6. CalculatethemomentcapacityusingEquationV6orEquationV7.
EQUATIONV6.GENERALIZEDMOMENTCAPACITY(DERIVEDFROMSSHB8.16).

2 0.85

12"

kip
1000lb

where: Mn
=thebendingmomentcapacityofthesection(kipft/ft)
= 0.9=thestrengthreductionfactorfromSSHB16.6.4.6
fc= thecompressivestrengthofconcrete(psi)
Fy= yieldstrengthofthereinforcement(psi)
= thestressinthecompressionsteel(psi)
As= areaofthetensionreinforcement(in.2)
As=areaofthecompressionreinforcement(in.2)
d = distancefromtheextremecompressionfibertothecentroidofthetension
reinforcement(in.)
d= distancefromtheextremecompressionfibertothecentroidofthecompression
reinforcement(in.)
b = widthofthecompressionfacemember(typically12inches)
Ifnotensilesteelreinforcingisprovided,themomentcapacitymaybetakenasthecrackingmomentsuchthatany
incidentalmomentintheunreinforceddirectiondoesnotresultinanoverconservativecontrollingloadrating.
ThisshouldbecalculatedusingEquationV7.
EQUATIONV7.MINIMUMCRACKINGMOMENTCAPACITY.

kip
1000lb
where: Mn
=thebendingmomentcapacityofthesection(kipft/ft)
= 0.9=thestrengthreductionfactorfromSSHB16.6.4.6
fc= thecompressivestrengthofconcrete(psi)
h = thethicknessofthetotalsection(in.)

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

29

2. SHEARCAPACITY
ShearcapacitymustbecalculatedateachcriticalsectionasdefinedinFigureII2.Technicallythesearethe
momentcriticalsections,andthisisaconservativeassumptionifmomentcontrolstheloadrating.Incaseswhere
shearappearstocontroltheloadrating,SectionVI.CofthisGuideprovidesadditionalinformation.
CapacityStep7. CalculatetheshearcapacityusingEquationV8orifneededEquationV9.
Becauseshearusuallydoesnotcontroltheloadrating,AASHTOallowsasimple,conservativecalculationfor
theshearcapacityusingtheminimumshearcapacityshowninEquationV8.Iftheculvertloadratingisnot
controlledbyshear,thesimplercalculationisadequate.
EQUATIONV8.MINIMUMSHEARCAPACITY(DERIVEDFROMSSHB8.16.6.7).

3
2.5

forsinglespanslabscastmonolithicwiththeculvertwalls(typicalforTxDOTdesigns).
forsinglespanslabssimplysupported.

where: Vn=theshearcapacityofthesection(lb)
= 0.85fromSSHB16.6.4.6
fc= thecompressivestrengthofconcrete(psi)
d = thedepthfromcompressionfacetotensilereinforcementinthedirectionofMu(in.)
b = widthofthecompressionfacemember(typically12inches)
Ifitturnsoutthattheculvertloadratingiscontrolledbyshear,EquationV9canbeusedtodetermineshear
capacityinthecriticalsection.EquationV9willyieldamoreaccurate,lessconservativevalueforshearcapacity
butrequiresknowledgeoftheshearandmomentdemandsateachsectionandisthereforetediousandtime
consumingtoapply.
EQUATIONV9.SHEARCAPACITYEQUATION(SSHB8.16.6.7.1EQ.859).

2.14

4,600

where: Vn=theshearcapacityofthesection(lb)
forsinglespanslabscastmonolithicwiththeculvertwalls
3
2.5
forsinglespanslabssimplysupported
= 0.85fromSSHB16.6.4.6
fc= thecompressivestrengthofconcrete(psi)
thetensilesteelratiointhedirectionofMu
d = thedepthfromcompressionfacetotensilereinforcementinthedirectionofMu(in.)
b = widthofthecompressionfacemember(typically12inches)
Vu= thesheardemandorload(kip)
Mu=themomentdemandorload(kli)
1.0

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

30

3. THRUSTCAPACITY
AxialthrustcapacitymustbecalculatedateachcriticalsectionasdefinedinFigureII2.Technicallytheseare
themomentcriticalsections,butitisstandardpracticetoalsocalculateaxialthrustattheselocations.
CapacityStep8. CalculatethemaximumthrustcapacityusingEquationV10.Thereisonlyonethrust
capacitypercriticalsection.Thisisacompressive()capacity.
EQUATIONV10.THRUSTCAPACITY(SSHB8.16.4.2.1EQ.831).

0.85
where: Pn=thethrustcapacityofthesection(lb)
fc= thecompressivestrengthofconcrete(psi)
Fy= yieldstrengthofthereinforcement(psi)
Ag= thegrossareaofthesection(in.2)
As= areaofthetensionreinforcement(in.2)
As=areaofthecompressionreinforcement(in.2)
Usuallythethrustdemandismuchsmallerthanthethrustcapacity.Infact,thethrustdemandistypicallyless
thantheincidentalaxialloadassumedintheAASHTOSSHBforbeamcalculations.Thecapacityspecificationsin
thisGuideassumethistobethecase.
AthrustcheckforeachcriticalsectionisprovidedintheAASHTOSSHBandisdescribedinSectionVI.Bof
thisGuide(nextchapter).Ifthethrustcheckissatisfiedthenthethrustdemandislessthantheassumed
incidentalaxialloadandtheculvertslabslicesmaybeaccuratelymodeledforbothcapacityanddemandasbeam
elements.Thisisthenormalsituation.
However,ifthethrustcheckisnotsatisfied,theslabslicesarenolongerconsideredbeamsforanalysis
purposes,butinsteadmustbemodeledasbeamcolumns.Ifthisisthesituation,combinedbendingequations
mustbeusedfromAASHTOSSHBSection8.16.4.3.

TxDOT

VI.

CulvertRatingGuide

31

ANALYTICALMODELINGFORDEMANDLOADS
A. OVERVIEW
Analyticalmodelingisusedtodeterminethedeadloadandliveloaddemandonthestructure.ThisCulvert
RatingGuidedescribesahierarchicalapproachtocalculatethedemandloads.Thelowesttier,Level1,usesatwo
dimensional,structuralframemodelwithAASHTOloadings,balancingbottomslabloads,andsimplysupported
boundaryconditions.Thenexttier,Level2,alsousesatwodimensional,structuralframemodelwithAASHTO
loading,butusescontinuousspringsupportsforthebottomslabinsteadofbalancingbottomslabloads.TheLevel
3analysisusesatwodimensional,finiteelementanalysismodelofthesoilstructuresystemtodetermine
demands.Bymodelingsoilconditions,Level3considerssoilstructureinteractioneffectssuchassoilarching.
ThesearethemainapproachesdiscussedinthisGuide.
Asnoted,thisGuidealsodiscussesthegeneralcaseforculvertmodeling,whichisaLevel4analysis.Level4is
themostsophisticatedofthemodelingapproachesandusesatwoorthreedimensionalfiniteelementmodelof
thesoilstructuresystem.Level4modelingwouldtypicallybeusedforresearchorotherspecializedapplications,
andisdiscussedinChapterVIIofthisGuide.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

32

B. GENERALIZEDSTEPBYSTEPPROCEDUREFORDETERMININGDEMANDLOADS
TheflowchartinFigureIII2providesanoverviewoftheculvertloadratingprocess.Thischapterfocuseson
calculationofdemandloadsusinganalytical(computer)modeling.Regardlessofthelevelofanalysis,the
followingstepbystepprocedureapplies:
DemandStep1. Obtainloadratingparametersnecessarytodefineeachaspectofthecomputermodel:
dimensionaldata,strengthpropertiesforsteelandconcrete,soilproperties,andloads.
DemandStep2. Createtheanalyticalmodelbylayingoutthenodesandmembersandidentifyingthe
criticalsectionsfortheculvert.
DemandStep3. Applyappropriateboundaryconditions.
DemandStep4. Calculatethemagnitudeofdeadandliveloadsforbothverticalandlateralstress
distributions.
DemandStep5. Applythedeadandliveloadstressdistributionstotheculvertmodel.
DemandStep6. Defineloadcasesforthemodel.Brieflystated,thisconsistsofonesetofloadcases
designedtoinducemaximummomentattheculverthaunches,andasecondsetofloadcases
designedtoinducemaximummomentatculvertmidspans.
DemandStep7. Performdemandcalculationsforeachloadcase.Thatis,performseparatecomputer
runsasnecessarytodefinedemandmoments,shearsandaxialthrustsateachcriticalsectionas
definedforeachloadcase.Fourcomputerruns,minimum,aretypicallyrequired.
DemandStep8. Afterdeterminingthedemands,useEquationVI1tocheckthatactualthrustdemandis
lowerthantheincidentalaxialloadassumedinthemomentcapacityequations.
EQUATIONVI1.THRUSTCONTROLLIMIT(SSHB8.16.4.3EQ.837).

0.1
where: Pu= thethrustdemand(lb)
fc= thecompressivestrengthofconcrete(psi)
Ag= thegrossareaofthesection(in.2)
ItisassumedthroughoutthisGuidethatEquationVI1willalwaysbesatisfied.However,ifthischeckisnot
met,thecapacitiesmustberecalculatedusingbeamcolumntheoryasdescribedinAASHTOSSHBsection8.16.4.3.
DemandStep9. Thisstepmovesbeyondcalculationofthedemandloads.Oncethedemandmoments,
shearsandthrustsareestablishedforeachcriticalsectionintheculvert,foreachloadcase,these
mustbecombinedwiththecorrespondingcapacityvaluestodeterminetheratingfactorforboth
inventoryandoperatingconditionsperEquationII1.
DemandStep10. Thecontrollingratingfactorforeachcriticalsectionisdeterminedbyselectingthe
minimumratingfactor,forbothinventoryandoperatingconditions,basedonthemaximumand
minimumvaluesforeachtypeofload(moment,shearandthrust)foreachloadcase.
DemandStep11. Ifshearcontrolstheinventoryandoperatingratings,theloadratershouldperforma
lessconservativeanalysisoftheshearfailuremodebasedonshearcriticalsectionsasperthe
provisionsinSectionCofthischapter.
DemandStep12. Thecontrollingratingfactorsfortheculvertaretheminimumratingfactorsforboth
inventoryandoperatingconditions.
Thefollowingsectionsofthischapterprovidedetailsofthisstepbystepprocedure,asitappliestoeachlevelof
analysis.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

33

C. SHEARFAILUREMODEANALYSIS
Discussions about culvert load rating commonly acknowledge that in most cases, the mode of failure that
controlstheloadratingismoment.Theoneexceptionisdeepfillculvertswhichtendtofailinshear.Resultsfrom
aparametricanalysisofarepresentativesampleofTxDOTsreinforcedconcreteboxculvertdesignssupportthese
points.
Becauseculvertloadratingsareusuallycontrolledbymoment,itmakessensetoperforminitialloadrating
analysesforallfailuremodes(moment,axialthrustandshear)basedonmomentcriticalsections.Theseanalyses
willbetechnicallyaccuratebothformomentandaxialdemands,andconservativeforshear.
The reason for this conservatism is that the shear critical section for culvert corners is actually located at a
distancedawayfromthewallfaceconsistentwithAASHTOSSHB8.8.2and8.16.6.1.2(seeFigureVI1.A),rather
than located at the wall face as is done for moment (see Figure II2.A). This distinction only applies to culverts
without haunches, which is the most common case for TxDOT. For culverts with haunches, the corner critical
sections for shear are a distance d from the middle of the haunch (Figure VI1.B). Midspan critical section
locationsformomentandsheararethesame.
TEC

TEM

TIC

WTEC

WTIC
d

WEM

WIM

WBEC
d

WBIC

BEC

BIC

BEM

FIGUREVI.1.ASHEARCRITICALSECTIONSFORCULVERTSWITHOUTHAUNCHES.

TEM

TEC
d

TIC
d

WTEC

WTIC

WEM

WIM

WBEC

WBIC

BEC

BEM

BIC

FIGUREVI1.BSHEARCRITICALSECTIONSFORCULVERTSWITHHAUNCHES.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

34

Onlyincaseswhereshearendsupcontrollingtheloadratingwoulditbenecessarytoreanalyzeshear
demandsbasedontheshear criticalsectionsofFigureVI1.Thefollowingstepscapturethisprocedure.

ShearProvision1.
Assumethatthecontrollingfailuremodefortheloadratingismoment.Usethe
momentcriticalsections(seeFigureII2)asdiscussedinthisGuide.Performloadratinganalyses
andcheckallfailuremodes(moment,axialthrustandshear).
ShearProvision2.
Ifmoment controlstheloadrating,thereisnoneedtofurtherrefinetheshear
demandorcapacityanalyses.
ShearProvision3.
Ifshear controlstheloadrating,andtheinventoryratingisgreaterthanor
equaltoHS20(inventoryratingfactor(IRF)1),theculvertwillnotrequireloadpostingand
thereisnoneedtofurtherrefinethesheardemandorcapacityanalyses.
ShearProvision4.
Ifshearcontrolstheloadrating,andtheinventoryratingislessthanHS20
(IRF<1),redotheshearanalysesbasedontheshearcriticalsectionsasdefinedinAASHTOSSHB
8.8.2and8.16.6.1.2,withthecriticalsectionlocatedatadistancedawayfromthepointof
support(seeFigureVI1).Momentandaxialdemandsareunchanged.Selectthenewlowest
ratingfactorsfromallfailuremodes.
ShearProvision5.
If,basedontherevisedshearanalysis,shearcontinuestocontroltheload
ratingandtheinventoryratingisstilllessthanHS-20(IRF<1),usethedemand-dependantshear
capacityequation(EquationV9)togeneratecapacityvaluesusedtocalculateratingfactors.This
approachdoesnotincludeanyoftheconservativeshearassumptions.Selectthenewlowest
ratingfactorsfromallfailuremodes.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

35

D. LEVEL1ANALYSIS:TWODIMENSIONAL,SIMPLYSUPPORTEDSTRUCTURALFRAME
MODEL
ThislevelofanalysisusesarelativelysimpletwodimensionalframeanalysismodelandAASHTOloading
parameters.Itisdesignedtoprovideaquick,conservative,repeatableloadrating.

1. ASSUMPTIONS
Thefollowingassumptionsaremadeinthetwodimensionalstructuralframeanalysisstage:

AASHTOloadsareapplied.
Grosssectionpropertiescontrolstructurebehavioratultimatestrength.
Culvertcornersareconsideredrigid.
Supportingsoilpressuresareuniformoverthelengthofthebottomslab.
Allassumptionsinherentlyinvolvedintwodimensional,frameanalysis.
o Reinforcedconcretebehaveselasticallywithstressrelatedlinearlytostrain.
o Reinforcedconcretebehavesidenticallyregardlessofdirectionoftheappliedload.
o Alldeformationsaresmall.
o Beamsarelongrelativetotheirdepth.
o Planesectionsremainplane.
Aonefoot(b=12in.)sectionoftheculvertmaybeanalyzedasaframe.
Nohydrostaticpressure(water)existsinsidetheculvert.
Supportingsoilsarefullydrained,i.e.nohydrostaticpressureoutsidetheculvert.
Momentsresultingintensionontheinsidefaceoftheculvertarepositive.
Momentsresultingintensionontheoutsidefaceoftheculvertarenegative.

Thoughreinforcedconcretedoesnotgenerallysatisfythefirsttwo,twodimensional,frameanalysisassumptions
namely,elasticityandhomogeneitythismodelwillpredictapproximateandconservativemoment,shearand
thrustdemands.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

36

2. MODELDIMENSIONS
TheLevel1modelshouldbedevelopedsothatbeamnodesareatthecenterlineoftheslabsectionstheyare
modeling.Eachsectionshouldusethegrossareapropertiesofaonefootwidestripofculvert.
Anodeshouldbeplacedateachcriticalsectionsothattheresultantforcesandmomentswillbecalculated
automaticallyatthosepoints.Thelocationofthecornercriticalsectionscanbedetermineddirectlyasillustrated
inFigureVI2.Asnotedearlier,AASHTOspecifiesthatthemidspancriticalsectionsmustbedeterminedby
locatingthemaximumcombined(deadandliveload)momentinthemidspanregion.However,forthepurposes
ofthisGuide,themidspancriticalsectionisalwaysassumedtobelocatedatmidspan.
S + TEW /24 + TIW /24 (ft)

TIC

T/24
EW

TEC

T/24
IW

TEM

WTEC

WTIC

T/24
T

WEM

WIM
H + TT /24 + TB /24 (ft)

Y
X

T/24
B

WBIC
WBEC

BEM

BEC

BIC

FIGUREVI.2.AMODELDIMENSIONSFORALEVEL1ANALYSISFORCULVERTSWITHOUTHAUNCHES.

S + TEW/24 + TIW /24 (ft)

TIC

TEW /24 + F/12 (ft)

TEC

TIW /24 + F/12 (ft)

TEM

WTEC

WTIC

WEM

WIM
H + T T /24 + TB /24 (ft)

Y
X

TB /24 + F/12 (ft)

WBIC

WBEC

BEC

BEM

BIC

FIGUREVI2.BMODELDIMENSIONSFORALEVEL1ANALYSISFORCULVERTSWITHHAUNCHES.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

37

3. BOUNDARYCONDITIONS
IntheLevel1model,theprimaryfunctionoftheboundaryconditionsistomaintainglobalstability.Reactions
areofnoconcern.Themodelshouldbesimplysupported,withapinatthebottomleftcorner(restraininglobalX
andYdirections)androllersatotherbottomwallcenterlines(restraininglobalYdirectiononly).SeeFigureVI3.

Y
X

FIGUREVI.3.BOUNDARYCONDITIONSFORTWODIMENSIONAL,SIMPLYSUPPORTEDSTRUCTURALFRAMEMODEL.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

38

4. LOADS
TheloadsplacedonthestructureforLevel1modelingcorresponddirectlytotheprovisionsoftheAASHTO
policy.FigureVI4showstheloadlocationanddirectionconventions.Theloadsareasfollows:

DLVVerticalDeadLoad
DLhTHorizontalDeadLoad,topofculvert
DLhBHorizontalDeadLoad,bottomofculvert
LLVTVerticalLiveLoad,topslab
LLVBVerticalLiveLoad,bottomslab
LLhHorizontalLiveLoad
SWSelfWeightoftheculvert

LL vT

DL v
DL hT

Y
X

LL h

DL hB
SW

DL v
LL vB

FIGUREVI.4.LOADCONVENTIONSFORTWODIMENSIONAL,SIMPLYSUPPORTEDSTRUCTURALFRAMEMODEL.

AuniqueaspectoftheLevel1modelisthatinordertoaccountforupwardsoilpressuresupport,whatever
loadisplaceddownwardonthestructureshouldalsobeplacedupwardonthebottomslab,uniformly.Theresult
isbalancedverticalloadingandnoreactionsinthesupports.Theboundaryconditionsonlykeepthemodelstable.

Theyshouldnotcontributesignificantlytothesupportofthestructure.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

39

c. D EAD L OAD
PerEquationVI2,thefirstloadrepresentstheweightofthesoilontopofthestructure.Accordingto
AASHTOSSHB6.2.1.B,theunitweightofsoilis120pcf.Thisloadmustbeplaceddownwardonthetopslab,and
balancedbyplacingitupwardonthebottomslab.

EQUATIONVI2.VERTICALDEADLOAD,DLV(KSF)

0.120
where:

theverticaldeadload(ksf)
D= coversoildepth(ft)

PerEquationVI3,thesecondloadrepresentstheselfweightofthestructure.Ifthechosenanalysistoolhas
agravityfeature,thisshouldbeusedtoaccuratelydistributetheselfweightacrossthestructure.Otherwise,the
weightoftheslabsandwallsshouldbeappliedmanuallyinthedownwarddirection,expressedintermsofa
uniformlydistributedload.Whethertheselfweightisappliedautomaticallyormanually,thetotalselfweightof
theculvertshouldalsobeappliedupwardacrossthebottomslab,expressedintermsofauniformlydistributed
load.

EQUATIONVI3.SELFWEIGHTOFTHECULVERT,SW(KSF)

2
12

12

0.150
12

where: SW =theverticaldeadload(ksf)
TT= topslabthickness(in.)
TB= bottomslabthickness(in.)
TIW =interiorwallthickness(in.)
TEW =exteriorwallthickness(in.)
S = theclearspanofasinglebox(ft)
H= theclearheightofasinglebox(ft)
N= thenumberofboxspans

Thethirdloadisthehorizontaldeadload.Thisdeadloadisatrapezoidalloadplacedontheoutsidewallsof
theculvertfacinginward.TheloadisdeterminedusingtheequivalentfluidweightofsoillistedinAASHTOSSHB
6.2.1.Band3.20.2.EquationVI4andEquationVI5definethehorizontalloadatthetopandbottomoftheslab.
Intheseequations,theDandHvaluesareinfeet,andtheTvaluesareininches.Intermediatepointsmaybe
determinedbylinearinterpolationasnecessary.

EQUATIONVI4.HORIZONTALDEADLOADATTHETOPAPPLIEDTOTHEEXTERIORWALLSOFTHECULVERT,DLHT(KSF)

0.060
where:

24

thehorizontaldeadloadatthetopoftheexteriorwalls(ksf)
TT= topslabthickness(in.)
D= coversoildepth(ft)

EQUATIONVI5.HORIZONTALDEADLOADATTHEBOTTOMAPPLIEDTOTHEEXTERIORWALLSOFTHECULVERT,DLHB(KSF)

0.060

12

24

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

where:

40

thehorizontaldeadloadatthebottomoftheexteriorwalls(ksf)
TT= topslabthickness(in.)
TB= bottomslabthickness(in.)
H= theclearheightofasinglebox(ft)
D= coversoildepth(ft)

d. L IVE L OAD
TheliveloadonthestructureasrequiredbyAASHTOSSHB3.7.6isanHS20truck.Therearethreeliveloads
duetotheHS20truck:(1)thehorizontalliveload,LLh;(2)theverticalliveloadappliedtothetopslab,LLvT;and(3)
theverticalliveloadappliedtothebottomslab,LLvB.Theimpactfactor,IM,andallothervariablesusedinthelive
loadequationsaredefinedinTableIII1.
PerEquationVI6,thefirstliveloadisthehorizontalliveload,LLh(ksf).Thisloadisconstantregardlessofthe
numberoftruckspassingovertheculvert.AASHTOSSHB3.20.3providesa2ftsurchargeallowancefortrucks
whichareapproaching,butnotdirectlyabove,theculvert.

EQUATIONVI6.HORIZONTALLIVELOADAPPLIEDTOTHEEXTERIORWALLS,LLH(KSF)

2
where:

. 060
.120
thehorizontalliveloadontheexteriorwalls(ksf)

Theverticalliveloadappliedtothetopoftheculvert,LLvT(ksf),isthesecondtypeofliveload.Themagnitude
oftheverticalliveloaddependsonthedepthoffill,thewheelload,theculvertspan,theimpactfactor,the
numberoflanes,andthenumberoftrucks.ForthisGuide,theverticalliveloadhasbeenexpressedintermsof15
distinctequationsderivedfromAASHTOSSHB3.7.6,3.12.1,3.24.3.2and6.4,includingthelanereductionfactor
describedinAASHTOSSHB3.12.1.These15equationsarecollectivelydesignatedasEquationVI7.
Foragivenculvert,theloadratermustselectoneofthe15equationstodeterminethemagnitudeofthe
verticalliveload.Twovariablesgovernselectionoftheappropriateliveloadequation.Thefirstisthenumberof
lanespassingovertheculvert.Section3.6oftheSSHBprovidesguidancefordeterminingtrafficlanes.Generally,
thenumberoflanesisdeterminedbythenumberofwhole,12footwidelanesthatwillfitacrosstheroadway.
Roadwaysbetween20and24willhavetwolanes.Thesecondvariableisthedepthoffill,D.Thisfilldepthwill
yieldtheproperloadconfigurationaspertheAASHTOstressdistribution.Takentogether,thenumberoflanes
andthefilldepthestablishthecontrollingnumberoftrucksandidentifytheproperequationtouseforLLvT.
Oncethemagnitudeoftheliveloadhasbeenestablished,itisnecessarytodefinetheareaoverwhichthelive
loadacts.Theverticalliveloadshouldbeappliedasamovingloadacrossthetopoftheculvertstructure.Thiswill
havetheeffectofcreatingamomentenvelope,withbothmaximumandminimumvalues.Thelengthoverwhich
thepressureshouldbeapplied,thecentertocenterspacingforthedistributedloads,andthewheelload,P,used
tocalculateeachloadareillustratedinFigureVI5,FigureVI6andFigureVI7fordifferentcoverdepths.
Thefinalliveloadistheverticalliveloadappliedupwardtothebottomslab,LLvB(ksf).Thisliveloadis
derivedfromAASHTOSSHB16.6.4.3.ForthisGuide,themagnitudeoftheupwardliveloadhasbeenexpressedin
termsof15distinctequations.These15equationsarecollectivelydesignatedasEquationVI8.Theloadisplaced
upwardonthebottomslabtobalancetheverticalliveloadonthetopslabasillustratedinFigureVI5,FigureVI6
andFigureVI7.Again,theloadratermustselectoneofthe15equations.Theselectedequationshould
correspondtotheculvertsfillheightandnumberoflanes.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

41

EQUATIONVI7.VERTICALLIVELOADAPPLIEDTOTHETOPSLAB,LLVT(KSF).

NoofTrafficLanes

DepthofFill,D(ft)

0<D<2

2<D<3.4

3.4<D<8

8<D

0<D<2

1 IM P

4 0.06 S

1truck

2<D<2.3

1 IM P

1.75 D

1truck

2.3<D<3.4

1 IM 2 P

1.75 D 1.75 D 4

2trucks

3.4<D<8

8<D

3+

0<D<2

3+

2<D<2.3

3+

2.3<D<3.4

3+

3.4<D<7.2

3+

7.2<D<8

3+

8<D

where:

Magnitude,LLvT(ksf)
1
4 0.06

1truck

1
1.75

1truck

2
1.75

1.75

4.5
28

1.75

1.75 D

1.75

4 P
1.75 D

1truck

16

1truck

16

2trucks

2trucks

1truck

1
1.75

1truck

2
1.75

1.75 D

4 P
1.75 D
6 .9
1.75

2trucks

16

2trucks

26

3trucks

13.5 .9
1.75
28

theverticalliveloadonthetopslab(ksf)
IM =theimpactfactorfromTableII1
S = theclearspanofasinglebox(ft)
P = either4or16kipsasindicatedinFigureVI5throughFigureVI7
D = coversoildepth(ft)

1
4 0.06

1.75

1.75

9 P
1.75 D
28

1.75 D

1.75

ControllingNo.ofTrucks

26

3trucks

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

42

EQUATIONVI8.VERTICALLIVELOADAPPLIEDTOTHEBOTTOMSLAB,LLVB(KSF)

No.ofTrafficLanes DepthofFill,D(ft)
1

0<D<2

2<D<3.4

3.4<D<8

8<D

0<D<2

2<D<2.3

2.3<D<3.4

3.4<D<8

8<D

3+

0<D<2

3+

2.1<D<2.3

3+

2.3<D<3.4

3+

3.4<D<7.2

3+

7.2<D<8

3+

8<D

where:

Magnitude,LLvB(ksf)

ControllingNo.ofTrucks

1
2

1truck

0.06

1
1.75

1.75
2
1.75

1.75

1.75

1
2

1truck

2
4

2trucks

16

2trucks

1.75
4
1.75

1.75

1.75

9
1.75

28

16

1
2

2trucks

1truck

0.06

1.75

1
1.75

1truck

1
1.75

1truck

0.06

1.75

1truck

1
1.75

4.5
1.75

28

1truck

1truck

2
2
4

2trucks

1.75

4
1.75

16

2trucks

1.75

6 .9
1.75

26

3trucks

1.75

1.75

1.75

13.5 .9
1.75
28

26

theverticalliveloadonthebottomslab(ksf)
IM =theimpactfactorfromTableII1
S = theclearspanofasinglebox(ft)
H = theclearheightofasinglebox(ft)
P = either4or16kipsasindicatedinFigureVI5throughFigureVI7
D = coversoildepth(ft)

3trucks

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

LL vT(P=4k)

LL vT(P=16k)
14'

43

LL vT(P=16k)
14' to 30'

LL vB(P=4k)

LLvB(P=16k)

LLvB(P=16k)

2*H

2*H

2*H

FIGUREVI.5.LIVELOADDISTRIBUTIONFORD<2'FORTWODIMENSIONAL,SIMPLYSUPPORTEDSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSIS.

1.75 * D

1.75 * D

LL vT(P=4k)

LL vT(P=16k)

LL vT(P=16k)

LLvB(P=4k)

LLvB(P=16k)

LL vB(P=16k)

14'

1.75 * D

14' to 30'

FIGUREVI.6.LIVELOADDISTRIBUTIONFOR2'<D<8'FORTWODIMENSIONAL,SIMPLYSUPPORTEDSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSIS.

1.75 * D + 28'
LL vT(P=16k)

LLvB(P=16k)

FIGUREVI.7.LIVELOADDISTRIBUTIONFORD>8'FORTWODIMENSIONAL,SIMPLYSUPPORTEDSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSIS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

44

5. LOADCASES
InaccordancewithASSHTOSSHB3.20.2,twodemandanalysesmustbemadetodeterminetheworstcase
loadingconditionsontheculvertstructure.Thetwoanalysescombinethebasicloadingsdifferentlytoproduce
conservativedemandmoments,shearsandthrusts.

a. T OTAL L OAD C ASE


Thefirstanalysisisthetotalloadcase.Thetotalloadcaseisdesignedtocreatethemaximumdemandin
mostoftheculvertstructure;thatis,criticalsectionsTEC,TIC,BIC,BEC,WIM,WEM,WTIC,WBIC,WBEC,WTECas
perFigureII.Thetotalloadcaseisdesignedtoyieldthemaximumshearandaxialdemandsinthewholeculvert
andthemaximummomentdemandsinallbutthetopandbottommidspans(TEM,TIM,BEMandBIM).Thisload
caseappliestheabovedescribedloadswithaloadfactorof1.

b. R EDUCED L ATERAL L OAD C ASE


ThesecondanalysisisthereducedlateralloadcaseasdescribedinAASHTOSSHB6.2.1.B,3.20.2.The
reducedlateralloadcaseisdesignedtocreatethemaximumdemandmomentforthepositivemomentsections
(TEM,TIM,BEM,BIM).SeeFigureII.Thisloadcaseisintendedtocreateaworstcasescenariofortheslab
momentsbyreducingtheamountofreversecurvaturecreatedbylateralpressureontheculvertwalls.The
reducedlateralloadcaseusesthefollowingloadfactors:

VerticaldeadloadappliedtotopslabisthesameasEquationVI2.Loadfactorof1.
TheselfweightoftheculvertisthesameasEquationVI3.Loadfactorof1.
Horizontaldeadloadatthetopappliedtotheexteriorwallsoftheculvertisonehalfthevaluecalculated
byEquationVI4.Loadfactorof0.5.
Horizontaldeadloadatthebottomappliedtotheexteriorwallsoftheculvertisonehalfthevalue
calculatedbyEquationVI5.Loadfactorof0.5.
Nohorizontalliveloadisappliedtotheexteriorwallsoftheculvert.Loadfactorof0.
VerticalliveloadappliedtothetopslabisthesameasEquationVI7.Loadfactorof1.
VerticalliveloadappliedupwardtothebottomslabisthesameasEquationVI8.Loadfactorof1.

c. I NTERPRETATIONOF L OAD C ASE D ATA


Asageneralrule,itisnecessarytoperformmultiplecomputerruns(atleasttwo)tocalculatemoment,shear
andthrustdemandsforeachloadcase.Oncethedataareobtained,itiscustomarypracticetointerpretthedata
holistically.Thatis,theloadratershouldevaluatethemaximumandminimummoments,shearsandthrustsfor
eachcriticalsection,treatingthetwoloadcasesindependently.
Statedanotherway,eventhoughthetwoloadcasesaredesignedwiththeintenttoachievemaximum
demandsateitherthecornersorthemidspans,theloadratershouldnotmakeanaprioridecisiontoonly
evaluatethedatathisway.Thismeansthattheloadratershouldlookatmorethanjustthecornercriticalsections
forthetotalloadcaseresults,andmorethanjustthemidspancriticalsectionsforthereducedlateralloadcase
results.Instead,theloadratershouldevaluatemoment,shearandthrustdemandsforallofthecriticalsections
foreachloadcase.

6. DEMANDLOADCALCULATIONS
Havingcreatedtheanalyticalmodel,definedtheboundaryconditions,determinedthemagnitudeandextent
ofloads,andspecifiedtheloadcases,thenextstepistocalculatethemoment,shearandthrustdemands.This
requiresapplicationofanappropriatestructuralanalysissoftwarepackage,asdiscussedinthefollowingsectionof
theGuide.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

45

7. ANALYTICALPROGRAMCULV5
a. O VERVIEW
Thetwodimensional,simplysupportedframemodel(Level1)canbeanalyzedusingseveralcommercially
availablestructuralanalysissoftwareprograms.ExamplesincludeRISA2D,BRASS,BOXCAR,CULV5(TxDOTs
program)orolderframeanalysisprograms.
AtTxDOT,theprogrammostadeptforLevel1calculationsisCULV5.Therefore,specificguidancewillbe
providedforthistool.Ifauserismorecomfortablewithanotherframeanalysisprogram,thedesignerisfreeto
useit.
CULV5isanMSDOSprogramdevelopedanddistributedbytheTexasDepartmentofTransportation.The
heartoftheprogramisatwodimensionalframeanalysis.DocumentationsupportingCULV5includestheVersion
1.71Readmefile(TxDOT,2004),InputGuide(TxDOT,2003),andCULV5ConcreteBoxAnalysisProgram(TxDOT,
2003).TheloadraterwhointendstouseCULV5shouldbecomefamiliarwiththisdocumentationtobetter
understandtheinput,analysisapproach,andprogramoutput.

b. CULV5 S TRENGTHSAND L IMITATIONS


TheCULV5programhassomenotablestrengthsthatmakeittheidealfirstchoiceforaLevel1culvertload
ratingprogram.Theseare:

Quickandconservative
Programinputsareverysimple
Appropriateliveanddeadloadsareautomaticallycalculatedandapplied
Influencelinesareusedtodeterminemaximummoments,shearsandthrust
Amoreconservativebottomslabliveloadisused
ThesignconventionusedisthesameasthesignconventionoutlinedinSectionV.B

Notwithstandingitsmanystrengths,theCULV5programalsohassomenotablelimitationsthatmustbe
recognizedandaddressed:

Demandatthecriticalcornersectionsisnotautomaticallycalculated.
Theuseofinfluencelinestocalculateliveloadmomentsresultsinanoverlyconservativeliveloadapplied
tothebottomofthestructure.
Onlyculvertswith4orfewerbarrelsmaybeanalyzeddirectly.Culvertswithmorethan4barrelsmaybe
approximatedusinga4barrelmodelattheexpenseofslightlymoreconservativeresults.

Thelimitationsmaybeovercome.Determiningthecriticalsectiondemandrequireslinearinterpolation
betweenthe10thpointdemandswhichtheprogramdoesproduce.Iftheculvertfailstorate,notmuchtimehas
beenspentandtheusermaymoveontothehigherlevelmodels.

c. CULV5 S TEP BY S TEP I NSTRUCTIONS


CulvertloadratingforLevel1usingtheCULV5programcanbeaccomplishedbyfollowingthesesteps.This
sequenceassumestheloadraterhasalreadydefinedtheinputparametersandispreparedtocreatetheCulv5
inputfile.
CULV5Step1. UsingdataobtainedfortheculvertasdiscussedinChapterIVofthisGuide,writethe
CULV5inputfileinabasictexteditor(eg,Notepad)accordingtotheforminFigureVI8.
Alternatively,theloadratermayusetheCulv5InputprogramdevelopedbyTechMRTandhosted

ontheTxDOTBridgeDivisionwebsitetocreatetheinputfile.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

PSF # A6

County A15

Highway # A10

VI46

Control-Section-Job A11 Coder A3

Date (Automatic) A11

Line 1. Job ID
1

11

25

31

40

46

56

62

64

70

80

Description for the run - free form alphanumeric comments A80

Line 2. Job Description


1

80

Card ID

Line 3. Problem ID

Alphanumerica comments - Normally enter structure name or other descriptive comments A75

PROB

80

Unit Code (English)


LL Code (HS-20)
Omit LL (included)
LF Code (Service)
Card ID
Soil Weight (pcf) F4.0

Line 4. SPEC Card

SPEC E 1 2

1 20 .

14

20

4 5 6 7

23

B.C. Code (leave blank) Int Wall, T (in.) F4.1


Number of Spans, N F1
Top Haunch, F (in.) F3.0
Top Slab, T (in.) F4.1
LL Surcharge (ft) F3.2 Bottom Haunch, F (in.) F3.0
Clear Span, S (ft) F4.3
Clear Height, H (ft) F4.3
Max Hor Soil Preasure (pcf) F3.0
Bot Slab, T (in.) F4.1
Min Hor Soil Pressure (pcf) F3.0 Component Output
Cover Soil Depth, D (ft) F5.3
Ext Wall, T (in.) F4.1
Card ID

Line 5. CULV Card

CULV N S

6 7

1011

1415

TT

19

3132

TB

35

37

TEW

40

42

45

2 . 0 60 . 3 0 .

TIW

47

50

FIGUREVI.8.CULV5INPUTFORMAT.

52

5455

5758

60

FT

65

6768

FB

70

80

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

47

CULV5Step2. RuntheCULV5programusingtheinputfilecreatedinStep1.Oneofthepositive
featuresofCULV5isthatitisheavilypreprogrammed.Forculvertrating,thismeansthatall
calculationscanbemadebasedonoutputfromrunningtheCULV5programonlyonetime.
CULV5Step3. InterpretationoftheCULV5outputrequiresestablishingbothcornerandmidspan
criticalsections.
a.

UsingFigureVI9selectthe10thpointstosetupthelinearinterpolationassociatedwiththe
cornercriticalsections.

M2
TEC typ. between 0 and 2

M5
TIC1 typ. between 8 and 10
TIC2 typ. between 0 and 2

WTEC typ. between 8 and 10

WTIC typ. between 8 and 10

M1

M3

WBEC typ. between 0 and 2


M4
BEC typ. between 0 and 2

WBIC typ. between 0 and 2


M7
BIC2 typ. between 0 and 2
BIC1 typ. between 8 and 10

FIGUREVI.9.CULV5MEMBERANDCRITICALSECTIONDESIGN.

WithreferencetoFigureVI9,linearinterpolationtoestablishthecornercriticalsections
mustworkfromthecornertothenearestcornercriticalsection.Forexample,theupper
rightcornersection,TIC1,formember2(M2)mightbelocatedbetweennodes8and9.In
thisexample,thecalculationwouldstartwiththedemandsatnode9andaddthefraction
betweennodes9and8.
b.

Criticalsectionsformidspandemands(TEM,TIM,BEM,BIM,WEMandWIM)donotrequire
interpolation.Thesemaybeselectedatmidspan(node5).

CULV5Step4. FromtheCULV5outputfile,selecttheSUMMARYOFINDIVIDUALUNFACTORED
MOMENTS,SHEARANDAXIALFORCEStables.Recordtheverticaldeadload(VDL),lateraldeadload
(LDL),maximumverticalliveload(+VLL),minimumverticalliveload(VLL),andlateralliveload(LLL)
demandsateachcriticalsection.
CULV5Step5. Calculatethedeadandliveloaddemandforeachdemandtype(moment,shearand
axial),foreachloadcaseateachcriticalsectionusingEquationVI9andEquationVI10.Disthedead
loaddemandandListheliveloaddemandrequiredforratinginEquationII1.Notethattheliveload
demandswillhaveamaximumandminimumbecausethesederivefromamovingloadwhich

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

48

producesanenvelopetypesolution.Tomaintainasystematicapproach,typicalpracticeisto
determineboththemaximumandminimumliveloadsforeachtypeofdemandateachcritical
sectionandtoselecttheminimum(controlling)valuewhencalculatingratingfactors.
EQUATIONVI9.TOTALLOADCASE.

where: D= thedeadloaddemand
L = theliveloaddemand
VDL=theverticaldeadloaddemandfromCULV5output
LDL =thelateraldeadloaddemandfromCULV5output
VLL =theverticalliveloaddemandfromCULV5output.(Loadratingcalculationsforthisvariable
mustbedonetwice,forthemaximumandminimumvalues.)
LLL =thelateralliveloaddemandfromCULV5output
EQUATIONVI10.REDUCEDLATERALLOADCASE.

1
2
where: D= thedeadloaddemand
L = theliveloaddemand
VDL=theverticaldeadloaddemandfromCULV5output
LDL =thelateraldeadloaddemandfromCULV5output
VLL =theverticalliveloaddemandfromCULV5output.(Loadratingcalculationsforthisvariable
mustbedonetwice,forthemaximumandminimumvalues.)
CULV5Step6. UseEquationVI1toverifythatactualthrustdemandislowerthantheincidentalaxial
loadassumedinthemomentcapacityequations.
CULV5Step7. Thisstepgoesbeyondcalculationofdemandloadsandhastodowithcalculatingthe
culvertloadrating.Pertheculvertratingflowchart(FigureIII2)proceedtocalculateInventoryand
Operatingratingfactorsforeachcriticalsection,foreachdemandtype,foreachloadcaseper
EquationII1.
Whencalculatingtheratingfactors,exerciseextremecareregardingthesignsforbothdemandsand
capacities.

Liveloadandcapacitymustbeinthesamesignanddirection.
Iftheliveloadanddeadloadareinoppositedirectionsorthecalculatedratingfactorisnegative,
acheckshouldbemadetoinsurethatthestructurehasadequatecapacitytosupportthedead
load.I.E.
1.3

CULV5Step8. Selectthecontrollinginventoryandoperatingratingfactorsforeachsection.
CULV5Step9.

Selecttheoverallcontrollingratingfactorsfortheculvert.

CULV5Step10. Ifshearcontrolstheloadrating,theloadratershouldperformalessconservative
analysisoftheshearfailuremodebasedonshearcriticalsectionsaspertheprovisionsinSection
VI.C.
CULV5Step11. CalculatetheInventoryandOperatingRatingsperEquationII2.
AppendixCofthisGuidepresentsanexampleLevel1culvertloadratingcalculationbasedonCulv5.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

49

E. LEVEL2ANALYSIS:TWODIMENSIONALSTRUCTURALFRAMEMODELWITHSOILSPRINGS
TheLevel2analysisusesatwodimensionalstructuralframemodelandAASHTOloadingparameters,butwith
compressionspringstomodelverticalsoilsupportinsteadofbalancedloading.Thisisonlyslightlydifferentfrom
theLevel1model,buttheintroductionofthesoilspringssomewhatreducestheoverconservatisminLevel1.
Level2isdesignedtoprovideaquick,accurate,repeatableloadrating,andcanbeconsideredthegeneralcasefor
twodimensionalstructuralframeanalysisofreinforcedconcreteboxculverts.

1. ASSUMPTIONS
Theassumptionsinthetwodimensionalstructuralframeanalysiswithsoilsprings(Level2)areidenticalto
thoseinthetwodimensional,simplysupportedstructuralframeanalysis(Level1)withtheexceptionofthe
boundaryconditions.TheLevel2modelassumesthatsoilismoreaccuratelymodeledusingcompressivesprings
atintermediatelocationsalongthebottomslab.
ItshouldbenotedthatCULV5softwarewillnotsupportaLevel2analysisbecauseofinputlimitations;
namely,CULV5doesnotallowforintermediatecompressionspringsonthebottomslab.Thus,aLevel2analysis
requirestheuseoftwodimensionalframeanalysissoftwareprogramsotherthanCULV5.

2. MODELDIMENSIONS
ModellayoutincludingidentifyingmembersandnodesfortheLevel2modelisexactlythesameasforthe
Level1model.RefertoSectionVI.D.2andFigureVI2fordetails.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

50

3. BOUNDARYCONDITIONS
IntheLevel2model,theboundaryconditionsservetwoprimaryfunctions.Oneistomaintainglobalstability.
Tothatend,thebottomlefthandcornerofthemodelshouldberestrainedintheglobalXdirection.Thesecond
functionistoprovidedisplacementdependentresistancetotheverticalloadsbysupportingtheculvertwith
compressionsprings.
Relativetolayingoutthemodelandestablishingboundaryconditions,extranodesshouldbeaddedalongthe
bottomelementofthemodel(depictingthebottomslab)tocreate10spaces.Thesenodesshouldberestrained
usingcompressionspringsintheglobalYdirection.Thecompressionspringsmusthaveastiffnessassociatedwith
anappropriatemodulusofsubgradereaction,k,asperTableIV2.Thespringconstant,(pli),canthenbe
determinedusingEquationVI11.SeeFigureVI10.
Notethatthismodeldoesnotplacelateralspringsonelementsusedtomodeltheculvertsidewalls.Thisis
becausetheculvertsidewallsaremodeledtoreceivelateralsoilloads(trapezoidalpressuredistribution).Good
structuralmodelingpracticedictatesthatloadsandboundaryconditionsspringsarenotappliedatthesame
location.

EQUATIONVI11.SPRINGCONSTANTEQUATION

Where: =thespringconstant(pli)
k=themodulusofsubgradereaction(pci)
s=thetributarylengthassociatedwiththenode(in.)(Thisisequaltothespanlengthdividedby
10)
b=theunitslabwidth(12inches)

Y
X
S M= model span (in.)

scorn = SM /20 (in.)


sint = SM /10 (in.)

FIGUREVI.10.BOUNDARYCONDITIONSFORTWODIMENSIONALSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSISWITHSOILSPRINGS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

51

4. LOADS
TheloadsplacedonthestructureforLevel2modelingcorresponddirectlytotheprovisionsoftheAASHTO
policy.Theloadsareasfollows:

DLVVerticalDeadLoad
DLhTHorizontalDeadLoad,topofculvert
DLhBHorizontalDeadLoad,bottomofculvert
LLVTVerticalLiveLoad,topslab
LLhHorizontalLiveLoad

TheloadsforaLevel2modelarethesameasthoseusedforLevel1withoneexception.IntheLevel2model,
noupwardloadsareneededonthebottomslab.Thespringsupportsautomaticallyprovidethenecessaryuplift,
andtheydosomorerealistically.Thespringsupporteliminatestheneedtocalculatetheselfweightandthelive
loadappliedtothebottomoftheslab.OtherwisethedetailsandloadingphilosophyisthesameasfortheLevel1
model.SeetheLevel1modelforamorethoroughexplanation.FigureVI11illustratestheloadingconventionfor
aLevel2model.

LL

vT

DL

DL hT

Y
X
S M= model span (in.)

scorn = SM /20 (in.)


sint = SM /10 (in.)

LL h

DL hB

FIGUREVI.11.LOADCONVENTIONSFORTWODIMENSIONALSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSISWITHSOILSPRINGS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

52

a. D EAD L OAD
Thefirstloadrepresentstheweightofthesoilontopofthestructure,DLV.PleaseseeEquationVI2.
Thesecondloadrepresentstheselfweightofthestructure(thisisnotshowninFigureVI11forthepurposes
ofclarity).Ifthechosenanalysistoolhasagravityfeature,thisshouldbeusedtoaccuratelydistributetheself
weightacrossthestructure.Otherwise,theweightofthetopslabandwallsshouldbeapplieddownwardtothe
topslabandtheweightofthebottomslabshouldbeplaceddownwardonthebottomslab.SeeEquationVI3.
Thethirdloadisthehorizontaldeadload.PleaseseeEquationVI4andEquationVI5.

b. L IVE L OAD
TherearetwoliveloadsduetotheHS20truck:(1)thehorizontalliveload,LLh,and(2)theverticalliveload
appliedtothetopslab,LLvT.Theimpactfactor,IM,andallothervariablesusedintheliveloadequationsare
definedinTableIII1.
PerEquationVI6,thefirstliveloadisthehorizontalliveload,LLh(ksf).Thisloadisconstantregardlessofthe
numberoftruckspassingovertheculvert.AASHTOSSHB3.20.3providesa2ftsurchargeallowancefortrucks
whichareapproaching,butnotdirectlyabove,theculvert.
Theverticalliveloadappliedtothetopoftheculvert,LLvT(ksf),isthesecondtypeofliveload.Themagnitude
oftheverticalliveloaddependsonthedepthoffill,thewheelload,theculvertspan,theimpactfactor,the
numberoflanes,andthenumberoftrucks.ForthisGuide,theverticalliveloadhasbeenexpressedintermsof15
distinctequationsderivedfromAASHTOSSHB3.7.6,3.12.1,3.24.3.2and6.4,includingthelanereductionfactor
describedinAASHTOSSHB3.12.1.These15equationsarecollectivelydesignatedasEquationVI7.Foragiven
culvert,theloadratermustselectoneofthe15equationstodeterminethemagnitudeoftheverticalliveload.
ThisisthesameasfortheLevel1model.
Oncethemagnitudeoftheliveloadhasbeenestablished,itisnecessarytodefinetheareaoverwhichthelive
loadacts.Theverticalliveloadshouldbeappliedasamovingloadacrossthetopoftheculvertstructurewiththe
loadmovingfromlefttorightandfromrighttoleft.Thiswillhavetheeffectofcreatingamomentenvelope,with
bothmaximumandminimumvalues.Thelengthoverwhichthepressureshouldbeapplied,thecentertocenter
spacingforthedistributedloads,andthewheelload,P,usedtocalculateeachloadareillustratedinFigureVI12,
FigureVI13andFigureVI14fordifferentcoverdepths.

5. LOADCASES
LoadcasesfortheLevel2modelarethesameasfortheLevel1model.

6. DEMANDLOADCALCULATIONS
Havingcreatedtheanalyticalmodel,definedtheboundaryconditions,determinedthemagnitudeandextent
ofloads,andspecifiedtheloadcases,thenextstepistocalculatethemoment,shearandthrustdemands.This
requiresapplicationofanappropriatestructuralanalysissoftwarepackage,asdiscussedinthefollowingsectionof
theGuide.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

53

LL vT(P=4k)

LL vT(P=16k)
14'

LL vT(P=16k)
14' to 30'

FIGUREVI.12.LIVELOADDISTRIBUTIONFORD<2'FORTWODIMENSIONALSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSISWITHSOILSPRINGS.

1.75 * D

1.75 * D

14'
LL vT(P=4k)

LL vT(P=16k)

1.75 * D
14' to 30'
LL vT(P=16k)

FIGUREVI.13.LIVELOADDISTRIBUTIONFOR2'<D<8'FORTWODIMENSIONALSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSISWITHSOILSPRINGS.

1.75 * D + 28'
LL vT(P=16k)

FIGUREVI.14.LIVELOADDISTRIBUTIONFORD>8'FORTWODIMENSIONALSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSISWITHSOILSPRINGS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

54

7. ANALYTICALPROGRAMRISA2DWITHSPRINGSUPPORTS
a. O VERVIEW
Mostanalyticalframeprogramswithcompressionspringfoundationcapabilities,suchasRISA2D,STRUDLand
others,shouldbeadaptabletothespecificationsoutlinedforthismodelinglevel.Becauseitiswidelyavailable
throughoutTxDOT,specificguidancewillbegivenforRISA2D.Ifaloadraterismorecomfortablewithanother
frameanalysisprogram,he/sheisfreetouseit.
RISA2Disacommerciallyavailabletwodimensionalframeanalysisprogram.VersatilityofinputmakesRISA
2Dastrongcontenderforculvertloadratinganalysis,thoughitdoesrequiremorepreparatoryhandcalculations
thanCULV5.

b. RISA2D S TRENGTHSAND L IMITATIONS


TheRISA2DprogramhassomenotablestrengthsthatmakeittheidealfirstchoiceforaLevel2culvertload
ratingprogram.Theseare:

Programinputsaregraphicallybased
Deflections,shear,thrustandmomentscanberepresentedandanalyzedgraphically
Generalityallowsforintermediateboundaryconditions
Criticalsectiondemandscanbedetermineddirectly

Asnoted,theonelimitationtoRISA2DisthatitrequiresmorepreparatorycalculationsthanCULV5.Recall
thatCULV5isheavilypreprogrammedsothattheanalyticalmodelisgeneratedjustbyspecifyingonelineofcode
onapunchcard.RISA2D,however,requiresthatallnodesandbeamelementsbeindividuallyspecified.

c. RISA2D/S PRINGS S TEP BY S TEP I NSTRUCTIONS


CulvertloadratingforLevel2usingtheRISA2Dprogramcanbeaccomplishedbyfollowingthesesteps.This
sequenceassumestheloadraterhasalreadydefinedtheinputparametersandispreparedtocreatetheRISA2D
analyticalmodel.
RISA2DSpringStep1.
CalculateallloadsusingEquationVI2,EquationVI4,EquationVI5,Equation
VI6andEquationVI7.

RISA2DSpringStep2.
CreateamodelconsistentwithFigureVIandFigureVI10:
a. Disablecrackedsectionsandsheardeformationswithintheglobalparameters.Reduceoutputto
threepointspermember.
b. Layoutcornernodes.
c. Connectnodesusingmemberswithrectangularcrosssectionsandappropriateconcreteproperties
accordingtoTableII1andTableIV1.Drawmemberscounterclockwisearoundthecenterofthe
culverttoproduceconsistentmomentsignconventionsasperFigureVI15.Morespecifically:
Bottomelements,layoutlefttoright
Topelements,layoutrighttoleft
Wallelementsleftofcenter,layouttoptobottom
Wallelementsrightofcenter,layoutbottomtotop
Wallelementsatcenter(evenspans),layouttoptobottom
d. Usingthesplitmemberfunction,addsupportnodestothebottommembersandsetboundary
conditionsaccordingtoFigureVI11withspringconstantsfromEquationVI11.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

55

FIGUREVI.15.RISA2DBEAMELEMENTLAYOUTPATTERNFOR1,2,3,4AND5SPANCULVERTS

RISA2DSpringStep3.
ApplytheloadsaccordingtoFigureVI11inseparateBasicLoadCases.
a. VerticalDeadLoad,DLv(EquationVI2).Besuretoincludetheselfweightgravityloadingbyincluding
afactorof(1)intheYgravitydirection.
b. HorizontalDeadLoad,DLh(EquationVI4andEquationVI5)
c. HorizontalLiveLoad,LLh(EquationVI6)

RISA2DSpringStep4.
VerticalLiveLoad,LLVT(EquationVI7)mustbecalculatedandplacedasa
movingloadasseeninFigureVI12,FigureVI13andFigureVI14.Themovingloadwillbeapproximated
bycreatingamovingloadpatternof10equivalent,uniformlyspaced,pointloadsoverthelengthofeach
loadasseeninFigureVI16,FigureVI17andFigureVI18.Thesefiguresshowthemovingload
discretizedandgroupedintermsofthe10equivalent,uniformlyspaced,pointloads.Theloadshouldbe
appliedmovingfromrighttoleftandfromlefttoright.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

56

LL vT(P=4k)

LL vT(P=16k)
14'

Theoretical Model & RISA-2D Moving Load

LL vT(P=16k)
14' to 30'

FIGUREVI.16.RISA2DMOVINGLOADPATTERNFORD<2'FORTWODIMENSIONALSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSISWITHSOILSPRINGS.

1.75 * D

1.75 * D

1.75 * D

14' - 1.75*D

Theoretical Model

14' - 1.75*D
LL vT(P=16k)

LL vT(P=4k)

p = LL vT* s (kip)

14' - 1.75*D + s

LL vT(P=16k)

p = LL vT* s (kip)

14' - 1.75*D + s

p = LL vT* s (kip)
RISA-2D Moving Load

s = 1.75 * D / 10 (ft)

s = 1.75 * D / 10 (ft)

s = 1.75 * D / 10 (ft)

FIGUREVI.17.RISA2DMOVINGLOADPATTERNFOR2'<D<8'FORTWODIMENSIONALSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSISWITHSOILSPRINGS.

1.75 * D + 28'
LL vT(P=16k)

Theoretical Model

p = LL *vTs (kip)
RISA-2D Moving Load
s = (1.75 * D+ 28') / 30 (ft)

FIGUREVI.18.RISA2DMOVINGLOADPATTERNFORD>8'FORTWODIMENSIONALSTRUCTURALFRAMEANALYSISWITHSOILSPRINGS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

57

RISA2DSpringStep5.
Usethesplitmemberfunctiontosplitthemembersandcreatethecritical
sectionnodes.RelabelandsortthecriticalmembersusingaconventionsimilartotheCULV5naming
convention.SeeFigureVI19.

TEC

M102 from TIC1 to TEC

TIC1

TIC2

WTEC

WTIC

M101 from WTEC to WBEC

M103

WBEC
BEC

WBIC
BIC2

M104 from BEC to BIC1

BIC1

M105

M107

FIGUREVI.19.RISA2DMEMBERNAMINGCONVENTION.

RISA2DSpringStep6.
a.

b.

c.

d.

CreatefourLoadCombinationsfordeadandlivedemands.

UsethefollowingBasicLoadCaseFactorsfortheTotalLoadCasedeadloaddemands
DLvfactorof1.0
DLhfactorof1.0
UsethefollowingBasicLoadCaseFactorsfortheTotalLoadCaseliveloaddemands:
LLvfactorof1.0
LLhfactorof1.0
UsethefollowingBasicLoadCaseFactorsfortheReducedLateralLoadCasedeadloaddemands:
DLvfactorof1.0
DLhfactorof0.5
UsethefollowingBasicLoadCaseFactorstheReducedLateralLoadCaseliveloaddemands:
LLvfactorof1.0
LLhfactorof0.0

RISA2DSpringStep7.
UseRISA2Dtosolveformoment,shearandaxialdemand,deadandliveloads
separately.Thiswillrequirefourseparatecomputerruns,oneforeachloadcombination.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

58

RISA2DSpringStep8.
Recordthedeadloadandthemaximumandminimumliveloaddemandsfor
eachcriticalsectionforbothloadcasesfromthememberforcestable.
RISA2DSpringStep9.
UseEquationVI1toverifythatactualthrustdemandislowerthanthe
incidentalaxialloadassumedinthemomentcapacityequations.
RISA2DSpringStep10.
Thisstepgoesbeyondcalculationofdemandloadsandhastodowith
calculatingtheculvertloadrating.Pertheculvertratingflowchart(FigureIII2)proceedtocalculate
InventoryandOperatingratingfactorsforeachcriticalsection,foreachdemandtype,foreachloadcase
perEquationII1.
Whencalculatingtheratingfactors,exerciseextremecareregardingthesignsforbothdemandsand
capacities.
a.
b.

Liveloadandcapacitymustbeinthesamesignanddirection.
Iftheliveloadanddeadloadareinoppositedirectionsorthecalculatedratingisnegative,a
checkshouldbemadetoinsurethatthestructurehasadequatecapacitytosupportthedead
load.I.E.
1.3

RISA2DSpringStep11.

Selectthecontrollinginventoryandoperatingratingfactorsforeachsection.

RISA2DSpringStep12.

Selecttheoverallcontrollingratingfactorsfortheculvert.

RISA2DSpringStep13.
Ifshearcontrolstheloadrating,theloadratershouldperformaless
conservativeanalysisoftheshearfailuremodebasedonshearcriticalsectionsaspertheprovisionsin
SectionVI.C.
RISA2DSpringStep14.

CalculatetheInventoryandOperatingRatingsperEquationII2.

AppendixDofthisGuidepresentsanexampleLevel2culvertloadratingcalculationbasedonRISA2Dwith
springs.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

59

F. LEVEL3ANALYSIS:TWODIMENSIONALFINITEELEMENTSOILSTRUCTUREINTERACTION
MODEL.
TheLevel3analysisisbasedonatwodimensionalfiniteelementmodelofthesoilstructuresystem,and
AASHTOvehicleloadingparameters.Thesignificantbenefitofthismodelisthatitevaluatestheinteraction
betweentheculvertstructureandthesurroundingsoil.Soilisnolongerjustaloadappliedtothestructuralframe
(culvert),butinsteadisanintegralaspectoftheloadresistanceportionofthemodel.Becausetrafficloadsare
applieddirectlytothesoilandaretransmittedthroughthesoilelementstoimpacttheculvert,thisfiniteelement
approachobviatestheneedtouseAASHTOassumptionsforsoilpressuredistributionsorliveloaddistributionsin
thedirectionoftraffic.
ThedefiningfeatureoftheLevel3analysisisthatitassumesboththesoilandtheculvertslabelements
behaveasisotropic,linearelasticmaterials.Thatis,thedominantpropertyforexpressingtheengineering
behaviorofthesematerialsistheirelasticmodulus.Thisisobviouslyasimplifiedviewforsuchcomplexmaterials,
andother,moresophisticatedconstitutivemodelsforboththeculvertstructureandthesoilexist.However,for
basicloadratinganalyseswhereactualmaterialpropertiesareusuallynotknown,theuncertaintyintroducedby
usingasimplifiedlinearelasticmodelfortheculvertandsoilisconsistentwithotheruncertaintiesinthemodeling
process.

1. ASSUMPTIONS
Theassumptionsassociatedwithatwodimensionalfiniteelementmodelaresimilartothetwodimensional
frameanalysiswithextensionsandmodificationsforusingfiniteelementstomodelsoilbehaviorandloading.

AASHTOvehicleloaddistributionsareappliedinthetransversedirection.
Bodyweightofsoilelementsaccuratelymodelsoildeadloads.
Aonefoot(b=1ft)sectionoftheculvertmaybeanalyzed.
Nohydrostaticpressure(water)insidetheculvert.
Supportingsoilsarefullydrained,i.e.nohydrostaticpressureoutsidetheculvert.
Momentsresultingintensionontheinsidefaceoftheculvertarepositive.
Momentsresultingintensionontheoutsidefaceoftheculvertarenegative.

2. MODELDIMENSIONS
TheculvertmodeldimensionsforLevel3areexactlythesameasthoseforLevel2.RefertoSectionVI.D.2and
FigureVI2fordetails.IftheloadraterhasalreadydevelopedaLevel2culvertmodel,thiscanbedirectly
appropriatedintotheLevel3analysis.
Inadditiontotheculvertstructure,Level3requiresmodelingthesubsurfaceregime;thatis,thesoil
surroundingtheculvert.FigureVI20illustratestheextentofthesoilstructuremodel.Theoveralllimitsofthesoil
modelrelativetotheculvertareDabove,1.5Hbelow,and2Soneithersideoftheculvert.
Whencreatingasubmeshofthesoilelements,itisnecessarytodefineatleast10soilelementsalongeach
spanoftheculvert.Anydecreaseinthenumberofsoilelementsadjacenttotheculvertstructurewillresultin
significanterrorrelativetohowsoilloadsaretransmittedtotheculvertmodel.Soilelementsshouldbe
approximatelysquare.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

60

3. BOUNDARYCONDITIONS
BoundaryconditionsfortheLevel3modelmustmimiccontinuoussoilsurroundingtheculvert.Thismeans
thattheoutsideedgesofthemodelspace(soil)willberestrainedintheglobalXdirection,whilethebottomedge
ofthemodelspace(soil)willberestrainedintheglobalYdirection.Theculvertportionofthemodelisnot
restrainedbyboundaryconditionsfortheLevel3model.

D
S + TEW/24 + TIW/24

H + TT /24 + TB /24

2*S

1.5*H

FIGUREVI.20.SOILSTRUCTUREINTERACTIONMODELLAYOUT.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

61

4. LOADS
LoadsfortheLevel3modeldifferfromtheLevel1andLevel2modelsbecausethesoilispartofthemodeled
systemandisnolongeranotherloadappliedtotheculvertframe.
Thismeansthatalldeadloads,bothforsoilandfortheculvert,shouldbemodeledbythebodyforce(gravity)
ontherespectivefiniteelements.
LiveloadsmuststillbeestablishedusingAASHTOtrafficloadingguidelines.However,forLevel3,theonly
trafficloadistheverticalliveload,LLVT.Thistrafficloadmustbeconvertedtopointloadswhichareappliedtothe
soilsurface.ThisisconceptuallydifferentfromtheLLVTcalculationsforLevels1and2.
Previously,LLVTrepresentedadistributedloadappliedtotheculvertmodel.ThemagnitudeofLLVT
correspondedtoanattenuatedtrafficpressurecalculatedbasedonthedepthoffill,thewheelload,theculvert
span,theimpactfactor,thenumberoflanes,andthenumberoftrucks.Inotherwords,theliveloadpressure
actingontheculvertsurfacewasmuchreduced(attenuated)fromthetirecontactpressureduetothedistance
betweenthepointofapplication(wheretherubberhitstheroad)andtheculverttopslab(locatedsomedistance
belowgroundsurface).Theattenuationcalculationsaccountforprismaticspreadingoftheloadwithdepth,both
inplane(paralleltoculvertcrosssection)andoutofplane(perpendiculartoculvertcrosssection).
ForLevel3,theinplanetrafficpressure(wheelload)ismodeleddirectly,sinceitcanbedirectlyappliedtothe
soilsurface.Themodelingchallenge,therefore,istodefinethemagnitudeofthispressure(LLVT)suchthatit
reasonablyaccountsforoutofplaneattenuationattheculvertsurface.Toaccomplishthis,thetrafficloadis
distributedoveracertaindistanceintheoutofplanedirectiontoestablishthedistributedloadappliedtothe
culverttopslab.Thisattenuatedload,whichisamodifiedtypeofLLVTspecificallyforaLevel3model,isappliedas
apointloadtothesurfacesoilelements.
ForthisGuide,theverticalliveloadhasbeenexpressedintermsof10distinctequationsderivedfrom
AASHTO(AASHTO,2007).These10equationsarecollectivelydesignatedasEquationVI12.
AswiththeLevel1andLevel2models,foragivenculvert,theloadratermustselectoneofthe10equations
todeterminethemagnitudeoftheverticalliveload.Twovariablesgovernselectionoftheappropriateliveload
equation.Thefirstisthenumberoflanespassingovertheculvert.Thesecondvariableisthedepthoffill,D.This
filldepthwillyieldtheproperloadconfigurationaspertheAASHTOstressdistribution.Takentogether,the
numberoflanesandthefilldepthestablishthecontrollingnumberoftrucksandidentifytheproperequationto
useforLLvT.
ThemodifiedpointloadsareappliedtothetopofthesoilasmovingloadsaspertheHS20loadpattern
movingfromrighttoleftandlefttoright.FigureVI21illustratesthecentertocenterspacingforthemodified
pointloads.Justtobeclear,themodifiedpointloadsareappliedtothesoilsurfaceaspointloads,notastire
contactpressures.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

62

EQUATIONVI12.VERTICALLIVELOADAPPLIEDTOTHETOPSOILMASSFORLEVEL3ANALYSIS,LLVT(KLF)

NumberofTrafficLanes

DepthofFillD(ft)

0<D<2

2<D<3.8

1
1.15 D

1.67

1truck

3.8<D

2
1.15 D

7.67

1truck

0<D<2

2<D<3.8

LL

3.8<D

LL

3+

0<D<2

3+

2<D<3.8

LL

3+

3.8<D<9.4

LL

3+

9.4<D

LL

where:

MagnitudeLLvT(klf)
1
4 0.06

LL

1truck

1 IM P

4 0.06 S
1 IM
1.15 D

1truck

2 P

5.67

2truck

4 P

1.15 D 17.67

2trucks

1
4 0.06
T

ControllingNo.ofTrucks

1 IM
1.15 D

1truck

2 P

5.67

2truck

4 P

1.15 D 17.67

2trucks

.9 6 P

1.15 D 27.67

3trucks

theverticalliveloadonthetopslab(ksf)
IM =theimpactfactorfromTableII1
S = theclearspanofasinglebox(ft)
P = either4or16kipsasindicatedinFigureVI5throughFigureVI7
D = coversoildepth(ft)

5. LOADCASES
TheLevel3approachdirectlymodelstheculvertsoilinteraction,sotherearenoexternallyappliedlateral
loads.ThismeansthereisnoneedforthetotalandreducedlateralloadcasesaspertheLevel1andLevel2
analyses.ThedemandatcornercriticalsectionsandmidspansfortheLevel3analysisiswhatitis.

6. DEMANDLOADCALCULATIONS
Havingcreatedtheanalyticalmodel,definedtheboundaryconditions,anddeterminedthemagnitudeand
extentofloads,thenextstepistocalculatethemoment,shearandthrustdemands.Thisrequiresapplicationof
anappropriatestructuralanalysissoftwarepackage,asdiscussedinthefollowingsectionoftheGuide.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

63

LL vT(P=16k)

LL vT(P=16k)

LL vT(P=4k)

14'

14' to 30'

FIGUREVI.21.LIVELOADDISTRIBUTIONFORTWODIMENSIONALFINITEELEMENTMODELWITHSOILSTRUCTUREINTERACTION.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

64

7. ANALYTICALPROGRAMRISA2DWITHLINEARELASTICFINITEELEMENTS(LEFE)
a. O VERVIEW
Numerouscomputerprogramsareavailabletoperformtwodimensional,finiteelementmodelingofthe
culvertsoilsystem.Somehavetheiroriginsinstructuralmodeling,suchasRISA.Othershavetheiroriginsin
geotechnicalmodeling,suchasPLAXIS.Stillothershavebeenspecificallydesignedwithculverts/buriedpipesin
mindandfeaturebothcomplexstructuralresponsesystemsandmultiplesoilmodels,suchasCANDE.Stillmore
powerfulfiniteelementandfinitedifferenceprograms,suchasABACUSandFLAC,areavailablewhichcanmodel
complexstructuregeometriesandrepresentnonlinearvariationofsoilstiffnesswithstrainandanisotropy.
Notwithstandingthetechnologicalpullofincreasinglycomplexprogramsavailableformodelingtheculvert
soilsystem,certainfeaturesoftheculvertratingproblemsuggestthatformanyapplications,flexibilityandease
ofusearepreferabletocomputationalsophistication.First,culvertloadratingrequiresapplicationofamoving
loadacrosstheculvertsoilsystem,andthisnecessitatesspecificationofanonsymmetricalanalyticalmodel.
Defaultmodelsforthisapplicationarenotavailable,sotheymustbegeneratedfromthemostbasicinputfields.
Settingupmodelsthiswayistedious,timeconsuming,andhighlysusceptibletousererror.
Second,projectspecificdatafortheculvertandsoilengineeringpropertiesarerarelyavailable.Mostraters
willusedefaultparametersforconcreteandsteel(takenfromtheconstructiondrawings),andtheywillassume
basicstrengthparametersforsoil.Thispracticeisnotunreasonable,andistheruleratherthantheexception.
However,thepotentialforerrorintroducedbythesetypicalpracticeswill,inmostsituations,overshadowbenefits
thatamorecomplexanalyticalmodelmaybringtothesolution.Thismeansthatmuchofthebenefitthatis,
morerefineddeterminationofthemoment,shearandthrustdemandsfromthemoreadvancedprogramsis
rarely,ifever,realized.
Athirdfactoristhatculvertratingcalculationsdospecifydeadandliveloads,buttheydonotpresumeto
specifytheextenttowhichtheculvertcansuitablysupporttheseloads.Thatiswhattheratingprocessismeant
todetermine.Thus,aweakorflexibleculvertwillnotsupporttheappliedloaditwillfaileitherbyexcess
deflectionorinadequatestructuralcapacity.Themorecomplexstructureandsoilmodelswillcertainlydepictthis
failure.Butwhilepredictingfailureforaweakculvertisagoodthing,itdoesnotyieldaloadrating.Itsimply
showsaparticularculvertwillnotwork.Thismeansthatwiththemorecomplexanalyticalmodels,determination
oftheloadratingforaweakculvertmayrequireiterativereductionoftrafficloadsuntiltheculvertdoesnotfail.
Thismanualconvergencesolutionapproachaddsmoreworktotheculvertratingprocess.
Withthesefactorsinmind,forthepurposesofLevel3analysesunderthisGuide,thedecisionhasbeenmade
torecommendusingRISA2Dwithlinearelasticfiniteelements(LEFE)tomodelthesoilstructureinteraction.
RISA2Dseemstoreasonablybalancecomputationalrigoragainsttheuniquerequirementsoftheculvertrating
problem.

b. RISA2D S TRENGTHSAND L IMITATIONS


TheRISA2DprogramhassomenotablestrengthsthatmakeitanidealchoiceforaLevel3culvertloadrating
program.Theseare:

Programinputsaregraphicallybased
Deflections,shear,thrustandmomentscanberepresentedandanalyzedgraphically
Theprogrammodelsinplanebehaviorofplatesverywell
Generalityallowsforintermediateboundaryconditions
Criticalsectiondemandscanbedetermineddirectly

OnelimitationtousingRISA2Disthattheconstitutivemodelsforbothconcreteandsoilarelimitedtothe
linearelasticmodel.However,asnotedabove,thisapproachallowsfordirectcalculationoftheratingfactor.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

65

c. RISA2D/LEFE S TEP BY S TEP I NSTRUCTIONS


CulvertloadratingforLevel3usingtheRISA2Dprogramcanbeaccomplishedbyfollowingthesesteps.This
sequenceassumestheloadraterhasalreadydefinedtheinputparametersandispreparedtocreatetheRISA2D
analyticalmodel.
RISA2DLEFEStep1. ModifythemodelcreatedfortheLevel2analysistomatchFigureVI20throughthe
followingsteps:
a.

RemoveallLevel2boundaryconditionsandloads.

b.

Placenewnodesattheoutsidecornersofthesoilareaaswellasattheedgesdirectlyabove,
belowandoutsidetheoutsidecornersoftheculvertaccordingtoFigureVI20.

c.

ConnectthenodesfromRISA2DLEFEStep1.busingtheplatedrawingtooltomakeeightlarge
soilelementssurroundingtheculvertandfillingthesoilarea.
i. TheelementsshouldhavethematerialpropertiesfromTableIV3.
ii. Theelementsshouldbe12in.thick.

d.

Usethesubmeshtooltoautomaticallysubmeshthelargeplates.Besuretospecifya
minimumof10elementsalongeachculvertspan.

e.

Createathinsoilbeamatthegroundsurface,runningfromthetopleftcornerofthesoilarea
tothetoprightcorner.Thisisnecessarytofacilitatetheapplicationofthemovingliveload.Itis
requiredbyalimitationinRISA2Dwhichrequiresmovingloadstobeappliedtobeamsonly.

f.

Settheboundaryconditionsfortheoutsideedgeofsoilmesh,asshowninFigureVI20.

RISA2DLEFEStep2. EstablishtheRISAloadcasesfordeadloadandliveload,asdiscussedinSectionVI.F.4.
a.

Thedeadloadissimplya1gravityloadingintheGlobalYdirection

b.

TheliveloadisamovingloadofmagnitudeandspacingasillustratedinFigureVI21and
calculatedinEquationVI12alongthesoilbeamcreatedinstep2.e.Usethecheckboxtorun
theloadbothdirectionsalongthebeam.

RISA2DLEFEStep3. UseRISA2Dtosolveformoment,shearandaxialdeadandliveloadsseparately.This
willrequiretwoseparatecomputerruns,oneforeachloadcombination.
RISA2DLEFEStep4. Recordthemaximumandminimumdemandsateachcriticalsectionfromthemember
forcestable.
RISA2DLEFEStep5. UseEquationVI1tocheckthatactualthrustdemandislowerthantheincidentalaxial
loadassumedinthemomentcapacityequations.
RISA2DLEFEStep6. Thisstepgoesbeyondcalculationofdemandloadsandhastodowithcalculatingthe
culvertloadrating.Pertheculvertratingflowchart(FigureIII2)proceedtocalculateInventoryand
Operatingratingfactorsforeachcriticalsection,foreachdemandtype,foreachloadcaseperEquation
II1.
Whencalculatingtheratingfactors,exerciseextremecareregardingthesignsforbothdemandsand
capacities.
a.

Liveloadandcapacitymustbeinthesamesignanddirection.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

b.

Iftheliveloadanddeadloadareinoppositedirectionsorthecalculatedratingisnegative,a
checkshouldbemadetoensurethatthestructurehasadequatecapacitytosupportthedead
load.I.E.
1.3

RISA2DLEFEStep7. Selectthecontrollinginventoryandoperatingratingfactorsforeachsection.
RISA2DLEFEStep8. Selecttheoverallcontrollingratingfactorsfortheculvert.
RISA2DLEFEStep9. Ifshearcontrolstheloadrating,theloadratershouldperformalessconservative
analysisoftheshearfailuremodebasedonshearcriticalsectionsaspertheprovisionsofSectionVI.C.
RISA2DLEFEStep10.

CalculatetheInventoryandOperatingRatingsperEquationII2.

AppendixEcontainsaculvertratingexampleusingRISA2DwithLEFE.

66

TxDOT

VII.

CulvertRatingGuide

67

THEGENERALANALYTICALMODELFORCULVERTLOADRATING
A. THELEVEL4ANALYSISDEFINED
Level4analysesgobeyondthecomputationalsophisticationoftheLevel1,Level2,andLevel3analyses
discussedinthisGuide.TheLevel4analysisforculvertloadratingmeanstheengineerusesamoreadvanced
modelingapproachtodetermineculvertloaddemands,culvertcapacity,orboth.Level4analyseswill,ata
minimum,modelsoilstructureinteractioneffects.Level4analysesmayuseeithertwodimensionalorthree
dimensionalmodelsfortheculvertsoilsystem.
ItisimportanttoemphasizethatLevel4meansahigherlevelofanalyticalsophisticationandnotbetter
qualityinput.EachofthemodelingapproachesdescribedinthisGuide(Level1,Level2,orLevel3)allowstheuse
ofdefaultinputparameterssuchasmaybeobtainedfrompolicy,fromconstructiondrawings,orfromthisGuide.
Resultsfromthesesamemodelingapproachesmaybeenhancedbyusingprojectspecificinputparameters,such
asactualconcretecompressivestrengthvalues,actualreinforcingsteeltensilestrengthvalues,actualsoilmodulus
values,andsoon.However,forLevel4modeling,itisassumedthatprojectspecificvalueswillalwaysbeused.
Thepointisthatamoresophisticatedmodelwarrantsmorerefinedprojectinputs.Itisawasteofefforttocreate
aLevel4culvertmodelbutpopulateitwithdefaultorhandbookmaterialparameters.
ItisalsoimportanttoemphasizethatthegoalofaLevel4analysisisamoreaccurateassessmentofthelive
loadcapacityoftheculvertstructure;i.e.,abetterloadrating.Usually,butnotalways,thistranslatestoahigher
loadratingthanwouldbeobtainedfromoneofthelesseranalyses.ThisisbecauseLevel4modelsdemandloads
(moments,shears,andaxialthrusts)inamorerefinedway,andwhenthedemandsaremorecorrectlymodeled,
theyaregenerallylessconservative.Butnothingintheloadratingprocessrequiresthattheinventoryand
operatingratingsfromaLevel4analysisbehigherthanforaLevel3analysis.

B. WHENTOUSEALEVEL4ANALYSIS
AsdiscussedinChapterIII,thelevelofanalysischosenisatradeoffbetweensophisticationofanalysisand
requiredworkeffort.Thesimplermethodsarefrequentlyselectedasafirstchoiceduetotheneedtoanalyze
manystructureswithlimitedresources.
Whenalowerlevelanalysisyieldssatisfactoryresults,thereisnoneedtouseamoresophisticatedmodel.
Satisfactoryresultswouldbetheestablishmentofsafeloadcarryingcapacitythatdoesnotrequirepostingthe
structureanddoesnotundulyrestricttheflowofpermittedoverweighttrucks.Amoresophisticatedanalysisis
justifiedtoavoidpostingthestructureortoeaserestrictionsontheflowofpermittedoverweighttrucks.
Typically,then,aLevel4analysismaybejustifiedwhenaLevel3analysis(performedusingprojectspecific
inputparameters)indicatesthataculvertmustbeloadposted,evenwheninthejudgmentoftheengineer
inspector,loadpostingisnotnecessary.Economicsalsoentersintothedecisionmakingprocess.Theengineer
mustevaluatethecostandeffortassociatedwithconductingaLevel4analysisagainstalternativecoursesof
action.
Level4analysiswillberequirediftheculvertisanythingotherthanareinforcedconcreteboxculvert.
ReinforcedconcreteboxculvertsarethemostcommontypeofculvertusedbyTxDOT,andLevel1,Level2,and
Level3analysesassumethatthestructureisareinforcedconcreteboxculvert.However,iftheculvertis
manufacturedfromothermaterialsuchasaluminum,plastic,orsteel,oriftheculvertshapeisotherthan
rectangularboxsuchasanarchorapipe,theLevel4analysiswillberequired.
ResearchorientedstudiesareanotherpotentialapplicationforLevel4analyses.Forexample,interpretation
ofloadtestdataforaculvertstructuremightrequirecomparisonofmemberstressesobtainedfromtheloadtest
withpredictedstressesobtainedfromculvertmodeling.Inthiscase,theuseofmoresophisticatedmodelsis
probablywarranted.
TheimportantthingtokeepinmindisthattheLevel4analysisrepresentsthemostgeneralmodeling
approach,butrequiresthemostspecificprojectinputparameters.Thismeansthatconsiderablecost,effortand

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

68

timewillberequiredbothtocreatetheLevel4analyticalmodel,andtoobtaintheinputparametersfromwhich
themodelwillyieldmeaningfulresults.

C. COMMENTSONTWODIMENSIONALVS.THREEDIMENSIONALMODELS
BothtwodimensionalandthreedimensionalfiniteelementmodelscanbeusedforaLevel4analysisofthe
culvertsoilsystem.Numerouscomputerprogramsareavailabletocreatethesemodels.Commentsareas
follows.

1. LEVEL4ANALYSISWITHATWODIMENSIONALMODEL
IfatwodimensionalmodelwillbeusedforaLevel4culvertloadratinganalysis,therecommendedcomputer
programfordeterminingdemandmoments,shearsandthrustsisCANDE(CulvertANalysisandDEsign).First
introducedin1976underthesponsorshipofFHWA,CANDEisaspecialpurpose,publicdomainfiniteelement
programthatisusedworldwideforthestructuraldesignandanalysisofburiedculverts.CANDEisviewedas
highlytrustworthy,havingbeencarefullydocumentedandvalidatedthroughmorethan30yearsofengineering
researchandconsultingapplications.ItiscomputationalrigorthatmakesCANDEsuperiortotheLevel3model
discussedinthisGuide(RISA2DwithLEFE).
CANDEwasrecentlyupgradedunderNCHRPProject1528tocreateCANDE2007andfeaturescomplex
structuralresponsesystemsandmultiplesoilmodels(MlynarskiM.M.,2008).CANDE2007providesanelastic
solution(CANDELevel1),automatedfiniteelementmeshgenerationforcommonconfigurations(CANDELevel2),
andauserdefinedfiniteelementmesh(CANDELevel3),allintwodimensions.Enhancementsoverearlier
versionsofCANDEincludeanupdatedfiniteelementanalysisengineandgraphicaltoolsforinterpretingthe
CANDEoutput.DocumentationforCANDE2007includestheUserManualandGuideline,SolutionMethodand
Formulations,andTutorialofApplications.Theseareinstalledwiththeprogram.
Relativetoculvertloadrating,CANDEsprimarybenefitsare:(a)anadvancedreinforcedconcreteconstitutive
modelfeaturingatrilinearcurveincompressionandanabrupttensionruptureatinitialtensioncracking,(b)five
alternativesoilmodelstochoosefromincludingisotropicelastic,orthotropicelastic,overburdendependent,
DuncanandDuncan/Selig,andextendedHardin,(c)theabilitytomodelculvertconstructioninincrements,and(d)
calculationofculvertperformanceintermsofstressdependentdemandtocapacityratios.CANDEalsoincludes
subroutinestodirectlyfacilitateanalysisofculverttypesotherthanreinforcedconcreteboxes.
Notwithstandingitssuperiorcomputationalrigor,CANDEwasnotspecificallydesignedforculvertloadrating
andthusisnotveryuserfriendlyforloadratingapplications.ToloadrateaculvertusingCANDE2007,theuser
mustrelyonaCANDELevel3analysis(themostgenerallevelforCANDE).Evenwhentheuserisveryfamiliarwith
theCANDEprogram,creationoftheuserdefinedfiniteelementmeshandapplicationofmovingloadsarehighly
tediousandverytimeconsuming.WhereasastructuralengineerfamiliarwithRISAcanlikelyperformaLevel3
analysis(asdiscussedinthisGuide,usingRISAwithLEFE)inafewhours,loadratingthesameculvertusingCANDE
couldtakedays.

2. LEVEL4ANALYSISWITHATHREEDIMENSIONALMODEL
Wheninvestigatingtheperformanceofculvertswithshallowcoversubjectedtoliveloads,ithasbeen
recognizedthatthreedimensionalattenuationoftheliveloadtakesplaceboththroughthesoilandthestructure.
Inmostcasesevaluatingliveloadeffectsintwodimensionsleadstoconservativedesigns,asthelongitudinal
distributionofloadisunderestimated.Thus,threedimensionalanalysisoftheloadratingproblemshouldleadto
betterresults.
However,severalmodelingissuesmustbesuitablyaddressedtosolvethethreedimensionalculvertrating
problem.Theseincludebutarenotlimitedtospecificationofthestructuralmodel,modelingthevehicle(live
load)geometry,selectionofthesoilandreinforcedconcreteconstitutivemodels,inclusionofsoilshearfailureand
stiffnessvariationwithdepth,modelingoflongitudinalbeddingtosupporttheculvertstructure,andmodelingof
culvertjointeffects.Tothisend,aLevel4analysisbasedonthreedimensionalmodelingoftheculvertsoilsystem
representsthemostadvancedapproachtoculvertloadrating.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

69

Severalsoftwareprogramscanbeusedforthreedimensionalculvertloadratingapplications,someofthe
moreprominentexamplesbeingABAQUS,ANSYS,FLAC3D,andPLAXIS.Amongcommerciallyavailablesoftware
programssuitableforthreedimensionalmodeling,ABAQUSstandsout.ABAQUSisageneralpurposefinite
elementanalysiscode,butithasbeensuccessfullyprogrammedtoproviderealisticsimulationsthatallow
accuratepredictionsofsoildeformationsandsoilstructureinteractions.ABAQUSfeaturesawelldeveloped
graphicalinterfaceandcompatibilitywithvariousCADprogramswhichenhanceitsusability.

D. PRACTICALCONSIDERATIONSFORLEVEL4CULVERTLOADRATINGANALYSES
ThisGuiderecognizesahierarchyofanalysisforperformingthedemandcalculations,withLevel4beingthe
mostgeneralandthemostsophisticatedmodelingapproach.Level4analysesarewarrantedonlyforspecialized
applications.Typically,aLevel4culvertloadratinganalysiswouldbedoneonlyifaLevel3analysisbasedon
projectspecificinputdatafailstoyieldsatisfactoryresults.
Level4analysesrequirehighquality,projectspecificinputdatafortheculvertstructuralproperties,soil
properties,andvehicleloads.BecauseLevel4analysesarethemostgeneral,theyarealsothemostcomplexand
difficulttocreate.Numerousengineeringdecisionsmustbemadetofullyspecifythemodel.
SuccessfulmodelingatLevel4presumesthattheloadraterhasastrongbackgroundinstructuralmodelingin
generalandtheculvertloadratingprocessinparticular.Evenundertheseconditions,itshouldbeexpectedthat
Level4analyseswillbehighlycomplex,timeconsuming,andcostlytoperform.

TxDOT

VIII.

CulvertRatingGuide

71

LIMITATIONS
ThisCulvertRatingGuidehasbeendevelopedinordertopresentaclear,repeatableandvalidprocedurefor
TxDOTengineersandtheirconsultantstousewhenloadratingculvertsintheTxDOTroadwaysystem.Through
TxDOTresearchproject05849,theanalyticalapproachesdescribedhereinwerevalidatedbyloadratinga
representativesampleofTxDOTculvertdesignsfromeachofTxDOTsculvertdesigneras,byperforminga
parametricstudy,andthroughcomparativeanalysesusingdatafromaverylimitedfieldinstrumentationandload
testprogramconsistingofthreereinforcedconcreteboxculvertsbeddedindrained,lowtomediumquality
backfillsoilunderlowdepthoffill.WhiletheprinciplesoutlinedinthisGuideareapplicabletootherapplications,
becauseofinherentdiversityofmanyaspectsoftheculvertloadratingprocessincludingculverttype,soilbackfill
conditions,drainage,analyticalmodelingtools,andothers,certainlimitationsmustbenoted.

A. CULVERTTYPE
ThisGuidehasbeendevelopedforloadratingcastinplacereinforcedconcreteboxculverts,whicharethe
mostcommontypeofculvertusedbyTxDOT.Theloadratingmethodspresentedhereinhavenotbeenexplicitly
evaluatedforotherculvertmaterialssuchasplastic,steel,oraluminum.Precastconcreteboxculvertsmaybe
modeledusingtechniquessimilartothoseoutlinedinthisGuide;however,thecapacityequationsforprecast
concreteboxculvertspresentedinAASHTOsSSHBandMCEBareslightlydifferentfromthoseoutlinedherefor
reinforcedconcreteboxculverts.Roundpipes,arch,andotherculvertshapesbehaveverydifferentlyfrombox
culvertsandthisGuidedoesnotpresenttoolsandprocedurestomodeltheseotherculvertshapes.

B. FILLDEPTH
TxDOTsculvertdesignsmodelfilldepthsrangingfromzero(directtraffic)todeepfill(inexcessof20feet).
Parametricstudiesindicatethatthedeeperthefill,themoresoilstructureinteractioninfluencesculvertbehavior.
However,thefieldinstrumentationprogramforresearchproject05849onlyevaluatedculvertshavingfourfeet
orlessoffill.WhiletheproceduresoutlinedintheGuidecanbeusedtoloadratedeepfillculverts,itwillbe
especiallyimportanttovalidatethesoilparametersusedfordemandmodeling.

C. BACKFILLDRAINAGE
Submergedculvertsandculvertsinundrained,saturatedsoilsexistinvariouspartsofthestate,inparticular,
alongtheTexasGulfCoastandinhighrainfallareasofEastTexas.Researchproject05849didnotexploreor
considertheeffectsofwateronthestructuralcomponentofculvertbehavior.

D. SOILPARAMETERS
Thesampleloadratingandparametricstudiesperformedforresearchproject05849indicatethatthe
inventoryratingfactorissensitivetocertainsoilparametersandconditions,inparticular,thesoilmodulusvalue
usedforLevel3analyses.Bothpublishedliteratureandthefieldinstrumentationtestprogramforresearchproject
05849suggestthatsoilmodulusvaluesforagivensoilmayvarybyasmuchasonetotwoordersofmagnitude
dependingonoverburdenstress,drainage,themethodusedtodeterminemodulus,andotherfactors.Whilethe
Guidedoesofferhandbookvaluesforthesoilparameters,thesevaluesshouldbeusedwithcautionand
engineeringjudgment.

E. ANALYTICALMODEL
ThisGuidehasgivenpreferencetoanalyticalmodelsandstructuralanalysissoftwaresuitableforproduction
loadratingofculverts.Thisisasopposedtomodels/softwareprimarilyintendedforculvertdesignandanalysis,or
forresearch.Structuralanalysismodelsandsoftwarewhichincorporatemoresophisticatedconstitutivemodels
fortheculvertandthesoilexist,andthesemaybeusedforloadratingasperthediscussioninChapterVIIonLevel
4culvertloadratinganalyses.

TxDOT

IX.

CulvertRatingGuide

73

WORKSCITED

AASHTO.(2007).LRFDBridgeDesignSpecificationsCustomaryUnits4thEd.WashingtonD.C.:American
AsssociationofStateHighwayandTransportationOfficials.
AASHTO.(2003).ManualforConditionEvaluationofBridges(2nded.).Washington,D.C.:AmericanAssociationof
StateHighwayandTransportationOfficials.
AASHTO.(2002).StandardSpecificationsforHighwayBridges(17thed.).Washington,D.C.:AmericanAssociation
ofStateHighwayandTransportationOfficials.
Bowles,J.E.(1996).FoundationAnalysisandDesign(5thed.).NewYork:McGrawHill.
Coduto,D.P.(2001).FoundationDesignPrinciplesandPractices(3rded.).UpperSaddleRiver,NewJersey:
PrenticeHall.
FHWA.(1986).CulvertInspectionManual.Washington,D.C.:U.S.DepartmentofTransportation.
McCarthy,D.F.(2002).EssentialsofSoilMechanicsandFoundations.UpperSaddleRiver,NewJersey:Prentice
Hall.
Mlynarski,M.M.(2008).ModernizeandUpgradeCANDEforAnalysisandDesignofBuriedStructures.TheNational
Academies.Washington,DC:TransportationResearchBoard.
Mlynarski,M.,Katona,M.G.,&McGrath,T.J.(2008).CANDE2007CulvertAnalysisandDesignUserManualand
Guideline.MoonTownship,PA:NationalCooperativeHighwayResearchProjectNCHRP1528.
NAVFAC.(1986).SoilMechanics:NAVFACDM7.01.Alexandria,VA:NavalFacilitiesEngineeringCommand.
TxDOT.(2001).BridgeDesignManual.Austin,Tx:TexasDepartmentofTransportation.
TxDOT.(2002).BridgeInspectionManual.Austin,Tx:TexasDepartmentofTransportation.
TxDOT.(2003).ConcreteBoxCulvertAnalysisProgramCULV5InputGuide.Austin:TexasDepartmentof
Transportation.
TxDOT.(2003).CULV5ConcretBoxCulvertAnalysisProgram.Austin:TexasDepartmentofTransportation.
TxDOT.(2004).CULV5(Version1.71)Readme.pdf.Austin,Tx:TexasDepartmentofTransportation.
VanTil,e.(1972).PCASoilPrimer.Skokie,IL:PortlandCementAssociation.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

74

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

AppendixA.
EXAMPLECULVERTDETAILS
MC103:3SPAN,10X7WITH6FILL

75

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

76

1. OVERVIEW
ThisappendixintroducesanexampleculvertdesignatedMC103,3span,10x7with6fillwhichwillbe
usedtoillustrateloadratingcalculationsforLevel1,Level2,andLevel3analyses.Morespecifically,thisappendix
explainshowtoobtaintheculvertdimensionalandstructuralpropertiesnecessaryforaloadratinganalysis.
Typically,loadratingisperformedaspartoftheculvertinspectionprocess,sovariouskindsofdesign
informationmightbeavailablefortheculvertstructure.However,forthisexample,itisassumedthattheonly
informationavailableistheculvertplansheet.TxDOTsculvertdesignsappearonplansheetssuchastheone
showninFigureIX1.Thisparticularplansheetincludesdesignsfor25differentculverts,sodetailspertainingto
thespecificculvertinquestion(highlightedinyellow)mustbeidentified.Ratingvariablesaredeterminedthrough
takeoffsfromtheculvertplansheet.

FIGUREIX.1.EXAMPLECULVERTDESIGNSHEET.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

77

2. GENERALCULVERTINFORMATION
FigureIX2showsthetitleblockfromtheculvertplansheet,identifyingthedesignyearandrelateddesign
information.Thedesignyearisimportantbecauseitisusedtodeterminethesteelandconcretegradesasper
AASHTOpolicy,asdiscussedinSectionII.CofthisGuide.TableIX1summarizesgeneralinformationaboutthe
culvert.

FIGUREIX.2.EXAMPLECULVERT,TITLEBLOCKINFORMATIONFROMPLANSHEET.

TABLEIX1.EXAMPLECULVERT,GENERALINFORMATION.

sheet#

MC103

culvertID

MC103310x7w6

year

1958

concreteclass

steelgrade

NA

installationtype

NA

roadwidth(ft)

44

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

78

3. DIMENSIONS
FigureIX3enlargesthetypicalhalfsectionfromtheculvertplansheettofacilitatedeterminingtheculvert
dimensions.SectionIV.CofthisGuidediscussesthedimensionvariablesneededforculvertloadrating.TableIX2
summarizesthedimensionaldatafortheexampleculvert.Thisinformationisusedtocreatetheculvertmodel,a
crosssectionalsketchofwhichisshowninFigureIX4,includingidentificationofmembers,nodes,centerline
dimensions,andmostimportantly,locationoftheculvertcriticalsections.Thisculvertdoesnotcontainhaunches,
sothisaffectsdesignationoftheculvertcriticalsectionsshowninFigureIX4.

FIGUREIX.3.EXAMPLECULVERT,DIMENSIONSFROMPLANSHEET.

TABLEIX2.EXAMPLECULVERT,REQUIREDDIMENSIONS.

Dimension

Abbr.

numberofspans
coversoildepth
clearspan
clearheight
exteriorwallthickness
interiorwallthickness
topslabthickness
bottomslabthickness
tophaunchdimension

N
D
S
H
TEW
TIW
TT
TB
FT

bottomhaunchdimension

FB

Value
3.0
6.0
10.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
9.5
9.5
0.0

Units
ft
ft
ft
in.
in.
in.
in.
in.

0.0 in.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

79

TEC1
0
WTEC110
9

TIC1 TIC2

TEM1
2

M102

100
10
WTIC1 9

TIC3

TIM1
2

M105

TIC4

TEC2

TEM2

100
1
2
10
9 WTIC2

M108

10
10 WTEC2
9

M101

WEM1 5

WIM1

M103

M106

M109

5 WIM2

M104

WBEC1 00

BEC1

BEM1

WBIC1
6

0
100

BIC1

M107
1

BIC2

BIM1

0
100

BIC2

M110

WBIC2
2

BIC4

BEM2

WEM2

0
10 WBEC2

BEC2

FIGUREIX.4.CROSSSECTIONSKETCHOFTHEEXAMPLECULVERTFORTHEANALYTICALMODEL.

Commentary:
The10thpointnumberingschemeappliesonlyfortheCULV5output.ThesignconventionusedthroughouttheGuideisconsistent
withthislayoutinCULV5.However,inordertomaintainthesignconventioninthehigherlevelmodels(e.g.RISA2D),themembersmustbe
orientedasperFigureVI15.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

80

4. MATERIAL(STRUCTURAL)PROPERTIES
Designinformationincludingtheconcretestrength,reinforcingsteelgradeandotherdatamustbeobtained
fromtheplansheetandotherconstructiondocumentsasavailable.Whenthedesignyearisknown,structural
materialpropertiesfortheconcreteandsteelcanbeestablishedbasedonAASHTOpolicyasperSectionII.Cofthis
Guide.TableIX3summarizesthestructuralmaterialpropertiesfortheexampleculvert.

TABLEIX3.EXAMPLECULVERT,STRUCTURALMATERIALPROPERTIES.

MaterialProperties

Abbr.

Value

Units

comp.strengthofconcrete

fc

3000 psi

yieldstressofsteel

Fy

36000 psi

modulusofelasticityforsteel

Es

29000 ksi

modulusofelasticityforconc.

Ec

3122 ksi

modularratio

Whitney'sstressblock

0.85

5. SOILPARAMETERS
Sitespecificdetailsforthesoilsaroundthisculvertarenotavailable.Therefore,mediumsoilpropertieswill
beassumedfortheanalysis,asdefinedinSectionIV.EofthisGuide.TableIX4summarizesthesoilproperties.
TABLEIX4.EXAMPLECULVERTSOILPARAMETERS.

Type

Value

Units

soilunitweight

120 pcf

modulusofsubgradereaction
modulusofelasticity
Poisson'sratio

k
E

150 pci
20000 psi
0.3

Abbr.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

81

6. REINFORCINGSTEELSCHEDULE
Theculvertplansheetdetailsmustbecarefullyreviewedtodeterminethesizeandspacingofreinforcingbars
forthetensileandcompressivezonesintheculvert.SeeFigureIX3,FigureIX5andFigureIX6.Theareaofsteel
canthenbedeterminedusingEquationIX1.

EQUATIONIX1.AREAOFREINFORCINGSTEEL.

where: As= areaofthetensionreinforcement(in.2)


thereinforcingbarsize(1/8)

s = thereinforcingspacing(in.)
b = widthofthecompressionfacemember(typically12inches)

FIGUREIX.5.EXAMPLECULVERT,REINFORCINGSCHEDULEFROMPLANSHEET.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

82

FIGUREIX.6.EXAMPLECULVERT,DESIGNATIONOFREINFORCINGSTEELASPERPLANSHEET.

Ultimately,thegoalofthereinforcingsteelquantitytakeoffistoestablishtheareaofreinforcingsteelat
eachcriticalsection,forboththetensionandcompressionfaces,foreachmemberoftheculvert.Thismeansthat
itisnecessarytodefinetheareaofsteelateachcriticalsectionidentifiedonFigureIX4.TableIX5summarizes
thereinforcingsteelparametersforeachcriticalsectionoftheexampleculvert.
Itshouldbenotedthat,duetosymmetry,itisnecessarytospecifyonlyhalftheculvert.Sincetheexample
culvertisathreespanculvertshowninFigureIX4,Member106andMember103arethesameandwillyield
identicalresults.Thesameistrueformembers101and109,102and108,and104and110.Therefore,itis
necessarytodeterminethereinforcingsteelonlyforMembers101,102,103,104,105and107(1,2,3,4,5and7
inCULV5output).
Basedonthisfact,tosavework,someloadraterswillnotesymmetryconditionsupfrontandonlyspecify
criticalsectionsfortheuniquestructuralmembers.ThisGuidefollowsthispractice.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

83

TABLEIX5.EXAMPLECULVERT,REINFORCINGSTEELSCHEDULE.

M105

M107

18

B
B
B
Y
Z
Z
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B

5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

7.5
7.5
7.5
12
12
12
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5

D
C
C
C

5
5
5
5

8
8
8
8

E1
Y
Z
Z
D

6
4
4
4
5

E2
E1

6
6

E1
E2

6
6

E2

8
8
8
5
5
5
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8

0.4602
5
0.4602
5
0.4602
5
0.4602 7.55
0.0000 7.5
6 0.8836 7.5
12 0.1963
5
12 0.1963
5
12 0.1963
5
8 0.4602 7.5
0.0000 7.5
5.5 0.9639 7.5
6 0.8836 7.5
0.0000 7.5
6 0.8836 7.5
5.5 0.9639 7.5
0.0000 7.5
5.5 0.9639 7.5

7. CULVERTINSTALLATIONMETHOD
Theculvertinstallationmethodisunknown.However,sincetheculvertwasdesignedandinstalledinthelate
1950s,itisreasonabletoassumethatresidualstresseswhichmighthaveexistedforanembankmentortrench
installationwillhavedissipated.Thusitwillbeacceptabletoignorehowtheculvertwasinstalled.

d(in.)

As(in.2/ft)

As(in.2/ft)

Spacing(in.)

BarDia.(1/8")

Mark

Spacing(in.)

M104

0.0000
0.1309
0.0000
0.4909
0.4909
0.4909
0.1963
0.1963
0.1963
0.4909
0.4909
0.4909
0.4909
0.4909
0.4909
0.4909
0.4909
0.4909

BarDia.(1/8")

M103

WBEC
WEM
WTEC
TEC
TEM
TIC1
WBIC1
WIM1
WTIC1
BEC
BEM
BIC1
TIC2
TIM1
TIC3
BIC2
BIM1
BIC3

Mark

M102

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
19
20
21

OutsideLayerReinforcingSchedule

d(in.)

M101

Sections

Member

InsideLayerReinforcingSchedule

TxDOT

AppendixB.

CulvertRatingGuide

EXAMPLECULVERTCAPACITYCALCULATIONS

85

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

86

Whenthemodeldimensions,materialproperties,soilproperties,andreinforcingsteelparametersare
defined,themoment,shearandthrustcapacitiesforeachcriticalsectionoftheculvertmustbedetermined.
Becausethereinforcingsteellayoutforculvertsisnotfullysymmetrical,capacityisadirectionalproperty.
Thatis,theculvertslabslicesunderanalysiswillhavedifferentcapacitiesdependingonthedirectionofbending.
ThesignconventionusedthroughoutthisGuideisthatbendingwhichproducestensionontheinsidefaceofthe
culvertispositive,whilebendingwhichproducestensionontheoutsidefaceoftheculvertisnegative.Thesign
conventionisdefinedintermsofbending,withshearandaxialthrustfollowingon.Thereisnoseparate,
independentsignconventionforshearorforaxialthrust.
Ultimatelythen,thecapacitymustbedeterminedforeachcriticalsection,foreachtypeofstress(moment,
shearandthrust),forbothpositiveandnegativebending.TableIX6summarizescapacitycalculationresultsfor
eachcriticalsectionforthepositivebendingcase.Thecapacityvaluesareobtainedusingthestepbystep
procedurepresentedinChapterVofthisGuide.ThecriticalsectionsaredefinedinFigureIX4ofAppendixA,and
theareasofreinforcingsteelassociatedwitheachcriticalsectionareshowninTableIX5.

CapacityStep3.

CapacityStep4.

CapacityStep5.

CapacityStep6.

CapacityStep7.

Sections

CapacityStep2.

Member

TensileFaceInside(PositiveBending)

CapacityStep1.

TABLEIX6.EXAMPLECULVERTSECTIONPROPERTIES.

c(in.)

F's(psi)

F'b(psi)

check

Mn(kft/ft)

Vn(klf)

M101

1
2
3

WBEC
WEM
WTEC

1.16
1.22
1.16

0
0
0

0
0
0

NA
0.0426
NA

NA
OK
NA

2.4
1.7
2.4

8.4
8.4
8.4

M102

4
5
6

TEC
TEM
TIC1

1.39
0.68
1.57

0
0
0

0
0
0

0.0426
0.0426
0.0426

OK
OK
OK

10.2
10.2
10.2

13.4
13.4
13.4

M103

7
8
9

WBIC1
WIM1
WTIC1

0.98
0.98
0.98

0
0
0

0
0
0

0.0426
0.0426
0.0426

OK
OK
OK

2.6
2.6
2.6

8.4
8.4
8.4

M104

10
11
12

BEC
BEM
BIC1

1.39
0.68
1.59

0
0
0

0
0
0

0.0426
0.0426
0.0426

OK
OK
OK

10.2
10.2
10.2

13.4
13.4
13.4

M105

13
14
15

TIC2
TIM1
TIC3

1.57
0.68
1.57

0
0
0

0
0
0

0.0426
0.0426
0.0426

OK
OK
OK

10.2
10.2
10.2

13.4
13.4
13.4

M107

19
20
21

BIC2
BIM1
BIC3

1.59
0.68
1.59

0
0
0

0
0
0

0.0426
0.0426
0.0426

OK
OK
OK

10.2
10.2
10.2

13.4
13.4
13.4

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

87

TableVIII7summarizescapacitycalculationresultsforeachcriticalsectionforthenegativebendingcase.Again,
thecapacityvaluesareobtainedusingthestepbystepprocedurepresentedinChapterVofthisGuide.Notethat
thethrustcapacityneedonlybedeterminedonce.Becausethrustisalwaysnegative(compression),itisonly
presentedinTableIX7.

TABLEIX7.EXAMPLECULVERTSECTIONPROPERTIESCONT.

CapacityStep8.

CapacityStep7.

M107

CapacityStep6.

M105

CapacityStep5.

M104

CapacityStep4.

M103

WBEC
WEM
WTEC
TEC
TEM
TIC1
WBIC1
WIM1
WTIC1
BEC
BEM
BIC1
TIC2
TIM1
TIC3
BIC2
BIM1
BIC3

CapacityStep3.

M102

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
19
20
21

CapacityStep8.

M101

Sections

Thrust

CapacityStep1.

Member

TensileFaceOutside(NegativeBending)

c(in.)

F's(psi)

Pn(klf)

check

Mn(kft/ft)

Vn(klf)

Pn(klf)

0.64
1.05
0.64
1.16
0.96
1.39
0.98
0.98
0.98
1.16
0.96
1.44
1.39
0.96
1.39
1.44
0.96
1.44

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426
0.0426

OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK
OK

5.9
5.9
5.9
9.0
4.4
16.7
2.6
2.6
2.6
9.0
4.4
18.0
16.7
4.4
16.7
18.0
4.4
18.0

8.4
8.4
8.4
12.6
12.6
12.6
8.4
8.4
8.4
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.6
12.6

206.6
210.6
206.6
290.3
276.4
303.0
204.6
204.6
204.6
290.3
276.4
305.4
303.0
276.4
303.0
305.4
276.4
305.4

Itmustbeemphasizedthattheculvertloadratingprocessisonecomponentoftheculvertinspectionprocess,
andthetypicalcaseisthataculvertwhichisbeingloadratedwillhavehadavisualinspection.Section6.5.4ofthe
MCEBspecificallyaddressestherelationshipbetweenfieldinspectionandtheloadratingandnotesthatthe
conditionandextentofdeteriorationofstructuralcomponentsofthebridge[culvert]shouldbeconsideredinthe
computationofcapacitywhenforceormomentischosenforuseinthebasicratingequation.Thismeansthat
anydiscrepanciesfromplan,orexcessivedistresssuchasthinsections,spalling,cracking,deflection,exposed
reinforcingsteel,andotheritemswhichmayaffectstructuralcapacity,shouldbeconsideredwhenestablishing
actualsectioncapacities.Forthisexample,noadjustmentstoplanvalueshavebeenmade.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

AppendixC.

LEVEL1:CULV5EXAMPLEPROBLEM

89

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

90

CULV5Step1.
UsingdataobtainedfortheexampleculvertidentifiedinAppendixA,writetheCULV5
inputfileinabasictexteditor(eg,Notepad)accordingtotheforminFigureVI8.Alternatively,theload
ratermayusetheCulv5InputprogramdevelopedbyTechMRTandhostedontheTxDOTBridgeDivision
websitetocreatetheinputfile.Theinputfileforthisexampleisasfollows:

TAW
6-25-2008
Culvert Rating Guide VIII.C CULV-5 Example
PROB MC10-3 3 10x7w6
SPECE12
1 0
120.
CULV 310.007.006.00
09.5 09.5 07.0 07.0 2.060.30.

CULV5Step2.
RuntheCULV5programusingtheinputfilecreatedinstepone.Thefollowingisa
summaryoftheCULV5outputonsevenpages.Thisincludes:

CULVERT,SPECDATA.Page1presentsarestatementofinputvalues.Theloadratershould
verifythesearecorrect.

SUMMARYOFMAXIMUMFACTOREDMOMENTS,SHEARSANDAXIALFORCES.This
information,presentedonoutputpages2and3,isnotusedforculvertloadrating.
However,theloadratershouldnotethatbecausetheculvertstructureissymmetricalabout
itscenterline,eventhoughtheculvertisactuallymodeledusing10members,resultsare
onlypresentedfor6members.Thesearethe6membersrepresentingthemiddleandleft
sideofthemodel.Demandsforthefourmembersformingtherightportionofthemodel
(members6,8,9,and10)arethesameasforthethreemembersformingtheleftsideofthe
model(members1,2,3and4)andarethusomittedfromfurtherconsideration.

SUMMARYOFINDIVIDUALUNFACTOREDMOMENTSANDSHEARS.Thissectionofoutput
(pages4and5)containsdemandsformomentsandshearsat10thpointsforeachmember.
Thiswillbeusedinsubsequentstepsforloadrating.Shadedrowsrepresentcriticalsections.
Theseareeithermidspansectionsor10thpointnodesforinterpolationofcornercritical
sections.

SUMMARYOFINDIVIDUALUNFACTOREDAXIALFORCES.Thissectionofoutput(pages6
and7)containsdemandsforaxialthrustsat10thpointsforeachmember.Thiswillbeused
insubsequentstepsforloadrating.Shadedrowsrepresentcriticalsections.Theseareeither
midspansectionsor10thpointnodesforinterpolationofcornercriticalsections.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

JUN 25, 2008


CULV5

91

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TxDOT)


PAGE 1
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT ANALYSIS
Win32 Ver 1.71 Aug 2003
TAW

6-25-2008

Culvert Rating Guide VIII.C CULV-5 Example


PROB MC10-3 3 10x7w6

-- CULVERT, SPEC DATA (* DENOTES DEFAULT) -SERVICE LOAD DESIGN


LIVE LOADING
=
HS20
GAMMA FACTOR
=
1.00 *
BETA FACTOR FOR DL
=
1.00 *
BETA FACTOR FOR LL
=
1.00 *
SOIL WEIGHT (PCF)
= 120.00
IMPACT FACTOR
=
.00
NUMBER OF BARRELS
=
3
CLEAR SPAN (FT)
= 10.00
TOP SLAB THICKNESS (IN)
=
9.50
EXT WALL THICKNESS (IN)
=
7.00
DEPTH OF FILL (FT)
=
6.00
MAX LAT SOIL PRESSURE (PCF)= 60.00
TOP HAUNCH WIDTH (IN)
=
.00

ANALYSIS PROBLEM
OMIT LIVE LOAD AS PER SPECS
AXLE WT FOR OVERLOAD (LB)
PRINT 10TH PT MOMTS & SHRS
PRINT INFLUENCE LINES
CONCRETE WEIGHT (PCF)

=
NO
=
.00 *
=
YES *
=
= 150.00 *

FLOOR SPPORT
CLEAR HEIGHT (FT)
BOTTOM SLAB THICKNESS (IN)
INT WALL THICKNESS (IN)
LIVE LOAD SURCHARGE (FT)
MIN LAT SOIL PRESSURE (PCF)
BOTTOM HAUNCH WIDTH (IN)

=
=
=
=
=
=
=

-- EXTRA DEAD LOAD AND SPECIAL LIVE LOAD -NONE

SNGL
7.00
9.50
7.00
2.00
30.00
.00

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

JUN 25, 2008


CULV5

92

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TxDOT)


PAGE 2
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT ANALYSIS
Win32 Ver 1.71 Aug 2003
TAW

6-25-2008

Culvert Rating Guide VIII.C CULV-5 Example


PROB MC10-3 3 10x7w6

-- SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM FACTORED MOMENTS, SHEARS AND AXIAL FORCES -BM 10TH --- MOMENTS (KFT) ---- ----- SHEARS (K) ------ -- @AXIAL FORCES (K) -NO PT LDNG #1 LDNG #2 LDNG #3 LDNG #1 LDNG #2 LDNG #3 LDNG #1 LDNG #2 LDNG #3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-3.256
-2.288
-1.564
-1.067
-.786
-.707
-.815
-1.096
-1.537
-2.122
-2.819

-5.744
-3.509
-1.837
-.697
-.061
.098
-.191
-.898
-1.997
-3.459
-5.260

-5.098
-2.859
-1.180
-.035
.606
.771
.488
-.214
-1.307
-2.763
-4.553

1.436
1.113
.809
.523
.255
.005
-.226
-.439
-.634
-.811
-.970

3.217
2.478
1.776
1.110
.481
-.112
-.668
-1.188
-1.672
-2.119
-2.530

3.247
2.508
1.806
1.140
.511
-.082
-.638
-1.158
-1.642
-2.089
-2.500

-3.769
-3.769
-3.760
-3.760
-3.760
-3.760
-3.760
-3.760
-3.760
-3.760
-3.762

-5.282
-5.282
-5.282
-5.282
-5.282
-5.282
-5.282
-5.282
-5.282
-5.282
-5.276

-4.056
-4.056
-4.056
-4.056
-4.056
-4.056
-4.056
-4.056
-4.056
-4.056
-4.056

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-2.819 -5.262
1.130
-.735
4.671
2.046
7.004
3.880
8.114
4.770
8.000
4.720
6.663
3.731
4.139
1.803
.469 -1.110
-4.170 -5.468
-9.002 -11.193

-4.553
-.730
2.153
4.096
5.100
5.165
4.290
2.475
-.278
-3.972
-8.604

5.094
4.006
2.850
1.708
.642
-.383
-1.783
-2.849
-3.991
-5.147
-6.236

5.501
4.345
3.189
2.101
1.039
-.768
-1.805
-2.867
-3.954
-5.110
-6.266

4.056
3.168
2.280
1.393
.505
-.383
-1.270
-2.158
-3.046
-3.934
-4.821

-.983
-.999
-1.003
-1.003
-1.003
-1.003
-1.003
-1.003
-1.003
-.996
-.996

-2.517
-2.505
-2.504
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.511
-2.523
-2.500

-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500
-2.500

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

4
4
4
4
4
4

0
1
2
3
4
5

.974
.967
.961
.954
.947
.941
.934
.927
.924
.920
.918

.026
.011
-.004
-.019
-.034
-.049
-.064
-.079
-.093
-.119
-.144

.342
.333
.324
.315
.306
.297
.288
.279
.270
.261
.252

.025
.025
.025
.025
.025
.025
.025
.025
.025
.025
.025

-.047
-.047
-.047
-.047
-.047
-.047
-.047
-.047
-.047
-.047
-.047

-.012
-.012
-.012
-.012
-.012
-.012
-.012
-.012
-.012
-.012
-.012

-10.731
-10.731
-10.731
-10.731
-10.731
-10.731
-10.731
-10.731
-10.732
-10.732
-10.758

-10.550
-10.550
-10.550
-10.550
-10.550
-10.550
-10.550
-10.550
-10.550
-10.557
-10.769

-9.260
-9.260
-9.260
-9.260
-9.260
-9.260
-9.260
-9.260
-9.260
-9.260
-9.260

-3.256
1.076
4.875
7.362
8.542
8.414

-5.744
-.882
2.221
4.256
5.253
5.210

-5.098
-.882
2.298
4.443
5.552
5.626

5.451
4.210
2.972
1.735
.513
-.622

5.934
4.694
3.454
2.213
.976
-.604

4.473
3.494
2.516
1.537
.559
-.420

-1.414
-1.416
-1.416
-1.416
-1.417
-1.417

-3.254
-3.247
-3.248
-3.248
-3.248
-3.248

-3.247
-3.247
-3.247
-3.247
-3.247
-3.247

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

JUN 25, 2008


CULV5

93

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TxDOT)


PAGE 3
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT ANALYSIS
Win32 Ver 1.71 Aug 2003
TAW

6-25-2008

Culvert Rating Guide VIII.C CULV-5 Example


PROB MC10-3 3 10x7w6

-- SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM FACTORED MOMENTS, SHEARS AND AXIAL FORCES -- (CONT'D)


BM 10TH --- MOMENTS (KFT) ---- ----- SHEARS (K) ------ -- @AXIAL FORCES (K) -NO PT LDNG #1 LDNG #2 LDNG #3 LDNG #1 LDNG #2 LDNG #3 LDNG #1 LDNG #2 LDNG #3
4
4
4
4
4

- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

6.978
4.129
4.277
2.009
.334 -1.150
-4.647 -5.692
-9.977 -11.857

4.663
2.665
-.368
-4.437
-9.542

-1.757
-2.979
-4.216
-5.454
-6.695

-1.816
-3.053
-4.293
-5.534
-6.774

-1.399
-2.377
-3.356
-4.334
-5.313

-1.417
-1.417
-1.417
-1.426
-1.410

-3.248
-3.248
-3.248
-3.264
-3.249

-3.247
-3.247
-3.247
-3.247
-3.247

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-8.614 -10.872
-4.386 -5.580
-.485 -1.908
2.465
.582
4.231
1.993
4.891
2.465
4.231
1.993
2.465
.582
-.485 -1.908
-4.386 -5.580
-8.614 -10.872

-8.353
-4.125
-.837
1.512
2.921
3.391
2.921
1.512
-.837
-4.125
-8.353

5.928
4.772
3.616
2.482
1.400
.339
-1.400
-2.482
-3.616
-4.772
-5.928

5.686
4.581
3.482
2.395
1.319
-.273
-1.319
-2.395
-3.482
-4.581
-5.686

4.438
3.551
2.663
1.775
.888
.000
-.888
-1.775
-2.663
-3.551
-4.438

-1.010
-1.010
-1.029
-1.018
-1.018
-1.000
-1.018
-1.018
-1.029
-1.010
-1.010

-2.508
-2.512
-2.511
-2.512
-2.512
-2.512
-2.512
-2.512
-2.511
-2.512
-2.508

-2.511
-2.511
-2.511
-2.511
-2.511
-2.511
-2.511
-2.511
-2.511
-2.511
-2.511

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-9.478 -11.481
-4.818 -5.908
-.585 -1.974
2.570
.781
4.476
2.344
5.195
2.869
4.476
2.344
2.570
.781
-.585 -1.974
-4.818 -5.908
-9.478 -11.481

-9.200
-4.540
-.915
1.674
3.228
3.746
3.228
1.674
-.915
-4.540
-9.200

6.276
5.032
3.788
2.545
1.320
.178
-1.320
-2.545
-3.788
-5.032
-6.276

6.177
4.963
3.749
2.535
1.321
-.110
-1.321
-2.535
-3.749
-4.963
-6.177

4.893
3.914
2.936
1.957
.979
.000
-.979
-1.957
-2.936
-3.914
-4.893

-1.396
-1.396
-1.414
-1.404
-1.385
-1.385
-1.385
-1.404
-1.414
-1.396
-1.396

-3.253
-3.230
-3.235
-3.236
-3.236
-3.236
-3.236
-3.236
-3.235
-3.230
-3.253

-3.235
-3.235
-3.235
-3.235
-3.235
-3.235
-3.235
-3.235
-3.235
-3.235
-3.235

NOTE: LDNG #1 =
LDNG #2 =
LDNG #3 =
@ = AXIAL

100%(VERT DL) + 100%(+VERT LL) + 50%(LAT DL)


100%(VERT DL) + 100%(-VERT LL) + 100%(LAT DL) + 100%(LAT LL)
100%(VERT DL) + 100%(LAT DL) + 100%(LAT LL)
FORCES CORRESPONDING WITH MAXIMUM MOMENTS AT SAME SECTION

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

JUN 25, 2008


CULV5

94

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TxDOT)


PAGE 4
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT ANALYSIS
Win32 Ver 1.71 Aug 2003
TAW

6-25-2008

Culvert Rating Guide VIII.C CULV-5 Example


PROB MC10-3 3 10x7w6

-- SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL UNFACTORED MOMENTS AND SHEARS -BM 10TH


NO PT

--------- MOMENTS (KFT) --------VDL


LDL
+VLL
-VLL
LLL

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-2.150 -2.486
-2.119 -.606
-2.087
.786
-2.056 1.717
-2.024 2.217
-1.993 2.314
-1.961 2.036
-1.930 1.411
-1.898
.469
-1.866 -.764
-1.835 -2.258

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-1.835
1.648
4.191
5.795
6.459
6.184
4.970
2.816
-.278
-4.311
-9.283

-2.258
-1.976
-1.693
-1.411
-1.129
-.847
-.565
-.283
-.001
.281
.563

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

.614
.601
.588
.575
.562
.549
.536
.523
.510
.497
.484

-.231
-.227
-.223
-.219
-.215
-.211
-.207
-.203
-.199
-.195
-.191

.475
.479
.484
.488
.493
.497
.501
.506
.513
.521
.530

4
4
4
4
4
4

-2.150
1.696
4.506
6.281
7.020
6.723

-2.486
-2.174
-1.862
-1.550
-1.237
-.925

.137
.467
1.300
1.857
2.141
2.154

0
1
2
3
4
5

.137
.134
.131
.130
.129
.129
.128
.127
.127
.126
.145

----------- SHEARS (K) ----------VDL


LDL
+VLL
-VLL
LLL

-.645
-.651
-.657
-.662
-.668
-.673
-.679
-.685
-.690
-.696
-.707

-.462
-.134
.122
.304
.413
.450
.413
.304
.122
-.133
-.460

.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040

.145 -.709
.470 -.005
1.326 -.107
1.915 -.217
2.219 -.331
2.240 -.445
1.976 -.559
1.465 -.673
.748 -.831
.000 -1.497
.000 -2.589

-.460
-.403
-.345
-.288
-.230
-.172
-.115
-.057
.001
.058
.116

3.735
2.847
1.959
1.072
.184
-.704
-1.591
-2.479
-3.367
-4.254
-5.142

-.316
-.322
-.328
-.334
-.340
-.346
-.352
-.358
-.363
-.380
-.396

-.041
-.041
-.041
-.041
-.041
-.041
-.041
-.041
-.041
-.041
-.041

-.645
.000
-.077
-.187
-.299
-.415

-.462
-.404
-.346
-.288
-.230
-.172

2.739
2.094
1.485
.913
.377
-.122
-.585
-1.012
-1.402
-1.756
-2.073

.026
.026
.026
.026
.026
.026
.026
.026
.026
.026
.026

-.030
-.030
-.030
-.030
-.030
-.030
-.030
-.030
-.030
-.030
-.030

.468
.374
.281
.187
.094
.000
-.093
-.187
-.280
-.374
-.467

.267 1.227 1.445


.267 1.025 1.177
.267
.757
.908
.267
.503
.709
.267
.325
.534
.267
.188 -.385
.267 -.325 -.534
.267 -.503 -.709
.267 -.757 -.908
.267 -1.025 -1.177
.267 -1.227 -1.445

.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054

-.017
-.017
-.017
-.017
-.017
-.017
-.017
-.017
-.017
-.017
-.017

.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005
.005

.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040
.040

-.035
-.035
-.035
-.035
-.035
-.035
-.035
-.035
-.035
-.035
-.035

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

4.123
3.145
2.166
1.188
.209
-.770

.295
.295
.295
.295
.295
.295

1.180
.918
.658
.400
.156
.000

1.461
1.199
.938
.676
.418
-.184

.055
.055
.055
.055
.055
.055

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

JUN 25, 2008


CULV5

95

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TxDOT)


PAGE 5
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT ANALYSIS
Win32 Ver 1.71 Aug 2003
TAW

6-25-2008

Culvert Rating Guide VIII.C CULV-5 Example


PROB MC10-3 3 10x7w6

-- SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL UNFACTORED MOMENTS AND SHEARS -- (CONT'D)


BM 10TH
NO PT

--------- MOMENTS (KFT) --------VDL


LDL
+VLL
-VLL
LLL

4
4
4
4
4

- 6
5.391
- 7
3.023
- 8
-.381
- 9 -4.820
- 10 -10.295

-.613
-.301
.011
.323
.636

1.894 -.534
1.405 -.656
.710 -.782
.011 -1.255
.000 -2.315

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-8.800
-4.572
-1.284
1.065
2.474
2.944
2.474
1.065
-1.284
-4.572
-8.800

.372
.372
.372
.372
.372
.372
.372
.372
.372
.372
.372

.000
.000
.613
1.214
1.571
1.761
1.571
1.214
.613
.000
.000

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-9.681
-5.020
-1.395
1.194
2.747
3.265
2.747
1.194
-1.395
-5.020
-9.681

.405
.405
.405
.405
.405
.405
.405
.405
.405
.405
.405

.000
.000
.608
1.174
1.526
1.727
1.526
1.174
.608
.000
.000

----------- SHEARS (K) ----------VDL


LDL
+VLL
-VLL
LLL

-.114
-.056
.001
.059
.117

-1.748
-2.727
-3.705
-4.684
-5.662

.295 -.156 -.418


.295 -.400 -.676
.295 -.658 -.938
.295 -.918 -1.199
.295 -1.180 -1.461

.055
.055
.055
.055
.055

-2.520
-1.455
-1.072
-.930
-.928
-.925
-.928
-.930
-1.072
-1.455
-2.520

.075
.075
.075
.075
.075
.075
.075
.075
.075
.075
.075

4.438
3.551
2.663
1.775
.888
.000
-.888
-1.775
-2.663
-3.551
-4.438

.000 1.490 1.247


.000 1.221 1.030
.000
.953
.819
.000
.706
.619
.000
.512
.431
.000
.339 -.273
.000 -.512 -.431
.000 -.706 -.619
.000 -.953 -.819
.000 -1.221 -1.030
.000 -1.490 -1.247

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

-2.281
-1.369
-1.059
-.894
-.883
-.876
-.883
-.894
-1.059
-1.369
-2.281

.076
.076
.076
.076
.076
.076
.076
.076
.076
.076
.076

4.893
3.914
2.936
1.957
.979
.000
-.979
-1.957
-2.936
-3.914
-4.893

.000 1.383 1.284


.000 1.118 1.048
.000
.853
.813
.000
.588
.578
.000
.342
.342
.000
.178 -.110
.000 -.342 -.342
.000 -.588 -.578
.000 -.853 -.813
.000 -1.118 -1.048
.000 -1.383 -1.284

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

JUN 25, 2008


CULV5

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TxDOT)


PAGE 6
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT ANALYSIS
Win32 Ver 1.71 Aug 2003
TAW

6-25-2008

Culvert Rating Guide VIII.C CULV-5 Example


PROB MC10-3 3 10x7w6

-- SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL UNFACTORED AXIAL FORCES -BM 10TH


NO PT

-------- AXIAL FORCES (K) -------VDL


LDL
+VLL
-VLL
LLL

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-3.735
-3.735
-3.735
-3.735
-3.735
-3.735
-3.735
-3.735
-3.735
-3.735
-3.735

-.267
-.267
-.267
-.267
-.267
-.267
-.267
-.267
-.267
-.267
-.267

.099
.099
.108
.108
.108
.108
.108
.108
.108
.108
.105

-1.227
-1.227
-1.227
-1.227
-1.227
-1.227
-1.227
-1.227
-1.227
-1.227
-1.220

-.054
-.054
-.054
-.054
-.054
-.054
-.054
-.054
-.054
-.054
-.054

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

.041
.041
.041
.041
.041
.041
.041
.041
.041
.041
.041

-2.073
-2.073
-2.073
-2.073
-2.073
-2.073
-2.073
-2.073
-2.073
-2.073
-2.073

.013
-.003
-.007
-.007
-.007
-.007
-.007
-.007
-.007
.000
.000

-.018
-.005
-.004
-.001
-.001
-.001
-.001
-.001
-.011
-.023
-.001

-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-9.581
-9.581
-9.581
-9.581
-9.581
-9.581
-9.581
-9.581
-9.581
-9.581
-9.581

.267
.267
.267
.267
.267
.267
.267
.267
.267
.267
.267

-1.284
-1.284
-1.284
-1.284
-1.284
-1.284
-1.284
-1.284
-1.285
-1.285
-1.310

-1.290
-1.290
-1.290
-1.290
-1.290
-1.290
-1.290
-1.290
-1.290
-1.297
-1.510

.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054
.054

4
4
4
4
4
4

-.040
-.040
-.040
-.040
-.040
-.040

-2.739
-2.739
-2.739
-2.739
-2.739
-2.739

-.004
-.006
-.006
-.006
-.007
-.007

-.007
.000
-.001
-.001
-.001
-.001

-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468

0
1
2
3
4
5

96

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

JUN 25, 2008


CULV5

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TxDOT)


PAGE 7
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT ANALYSIS
Win32 Ver 1.71 Aug 2003
TAW

6-25-2008

Culvert Rating Guide VIII.C CULV-5 Example


PROB MC10-3 3 10x7w6

-- SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL UNFACTORED AXIAL FORCES -- (CONT'D)


BM 10TH
NO PT

-------- AXIAL FORCES (K) -------VDL


LDL
+VLL
-VLL
LLL

4
4
4
4
4

- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-.040
-.040
-.040
-.040
-.040

-2.739
-2.739
-2.739
-2.739
-2.739

-.007
-.007
-.007
-.017
.000

-.001
-.001
-.001
-.017
-.003

-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

.024
.024
.024
.024
.024
.024
.024
.024
.024
.024
.024

-2.068
-2.068
-2.068
-2.068
-2.068
-2.068
-2.068
-2.068
-2.068
-2.068
-2.068

.000
.000
-.019
-.008
-.008
.011
-.008
-.008
-.019
.000
.000

.003
-.001
.000
-.001
-.001
-.001
-.001
-.001
.000
-.001
.003

-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467
-.467

7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7

- 0
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10

-.024
-.024
-.024
-.024
-.024
-.024
-.024
-.024
-.024
-.024
-.024

-2.744
-2.744
-2.744
-2.744
-2.744
-2.744
-2.744
-2.744
-2.744
-2.744
-2.744

.000
.000
-.019
-.008
.011
.011
.011
-.008
-.019
.000
.000

-.018
.005
.000
-.001
-.001
-.001
-.001
-.001
.000
.005
-.018

-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468
-.468

NOTE:

VDL = VERT DL
LDL = LAT DL
+VLL = MAX POSITIVE VERT LL
-VLL = MAX NEGATIVE VERT LL
LLL = LAT LL
INCLUDING IMPACT FACT.
INCLUDING IMPACT FACT.

97

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

98

CULV5Step3.
InterpretationoftheCulv5outputrequiresestablishingbothcornerandmidspan
criticalsections.UsingtheSUMMARYOFINDIVIDUALUNFACTOREDMOMENTSANDSHEARS,andthe
locationofthecriticalsectionsasperFigureIX4,selectthe10thpointsneededtosetupthelinear
interpolationassociatedwithmoment,shearandaxialthrustdemandsforthecornercriticalsections.
Calculationofthedemandloads,byinterpolation,requiresaclearunderstandingoftheoverallsign
conventionandthewayinwhichCULV5laysoutthemembersand10thpoints.TableIX8illustrates
howtocalculatedemandmomentsforthecornercriticalsections.Thissameapproachwouldbeusedfor
shearandaxialthrustvalues.
Recallthatmidspandemandsaremodeledasbeinglocatedatmidspan.Thismeansthatthemidspan
demandsoccuratnode5.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

99

TABLEIX8.CULV5CRITICALSECTIONSFORDEMANDS.

Member

Sections
1 WBEC

M101

M102

M103

M107

Interpolation
10

5
10

4 TEC

5 TEM

10

10

7 WBIC1

10

10

10

10

12 BIC1

10

13 TIC2

10

10

15 TIC3

10

19 BIC2

10

10

5
9

20 BIM1

10

14 TIM1

6 TIC1

11 BEM

10

8 WIM1

21 BIC3
where:

3 WTEC

10 BEC

M105

2 WEM

9 WTIC1

M104

10thPoints

10

10

thedemandatthecriticalsection
thedemandattheNth10thpoint
themodelspanlength(ft)
thelengthfromtheclosestcornernodetocriticalsection,N(ft)

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

100

CULV5Step4. FromtheCULV5outputfile,SUMMARYOFINDIVIDUALUNFACTOREDMOMENTS,
SHEARANDAXIALFORCEStables,andbasedonthecriticalsectionsestablishedinStep3,recordthe
RawDemandsforverticaldeadload(VDL),lateraldeadload(LDL),maximumverticalliveload
(+VLL),minimumverticalliveload(VLL),andlateralliveload(LLL)demandsateachcriticalsection,
bothcornersandmidspans.SeeyellowhighlightingintheCULV5outputandthesummaryinTable
IX9.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

101

TABLEIX9.CULV5RAWDEMANDSATCRITICALSECTIONS.

Member
M101

M102

M103

M104

M105

M107

Sections

MVDL MLDL M+VLL MVLL

MLLL

VVDL

VLDL

V+VLL VVLL

VLLL

PVDL

PLDL

P+VLL PVLL

PLLL

WBEC

2.134 1.531

0.135

0.648

0.295

0.040

2.411

0.026

0.030

0.420

3.735 0.267

0.099

1.227 0.054

WEM

1.993

2.314

0.129

0.673

0.450

0.040

0.122

0.026

0.030

0.000

3.735 0.267

0.108

1.227 0.054

WTEC

1.851 1.499

0.135

0.701

0.294

0.040

1.912

0.026

0.030 0.420 3.735 0.267

0.107

1.224 0.054

TEC

0.747 2.170

0.247

0.489

0.442

3.458

0.267

1.164

1.361

0.008

0.014 0.467

0.054

0.041

2.073

TEM

6.184

0.847

2.240

0.445

0.172 0.704

0.267

0.188

0.385

0.054

0.041

2.073 0.007 0.001 0.467

TIC1

7.729

0.475

0.000

2.248

0.098

4.865

0.267

1.164 1.361

0.054

0.041

2.073

0.000

WBIC1

0.621

0.233

0.473

0.313

0.041 0.017

0.005

0.040

0.035

0.000

9.581

0.267

1.284 1.290

0.054

WIM1

0.549

0.211

0.497

0.346

0.041 0.017

0.005

0.040

0.035

0.000

9.581

0.267

1.284 1.290

0.054

WTIC1

0.491

0.193

0.525

0.388

0.041 0.017

0.005

0.040

0.035

0.000

9.581

0.267

1.297 1.402

0.054

0.008 0.467

10

BEC

0.948 2.389

0.240

0.443

0.444

3.817

0.295

1.098

1.379

0.055

0.040 2.739 0.005 0.005 0.468

11

BEM

6.723

0.925

2.154

0.415

0.172 0.770

0.295

0.000

0.184

0.055

0.040 2.739 0.007 0.001 0.468

12

BIC1

8.584

0.538

0.003

1.984

0.099

5.356

0.295

1.098 1.379

0.055

0.040 2.739 0.005 0.007 0.468

13

TIC2

7.479

0.372

0.000

2.187

0.075

4.161

0.000

1.406

1.179

0.000

0.024

2.068

0.000

0.002

14

TIM1

2.944

0.372

1.761

0.925

0.075

0.000

0.000

0.339

0.273

0.000

0.024

2.068

0.011

0.001 0.467

0.467

15

TIC3

7.479

0.372

0.000

2.187

0.075

4.161

0.000

1.406 1.179

0.000

0.024

2.068

0.000

0.002

19

BIC2

8.224

0.405

0.000

1.996

0.076

4.587

0.000

1.300

1.210

0.000

0.024 2.744

0.000

0.011 0.468

20

BIM1

3.265

0.405

1.727

0.876

0.076

0.000

0.000

0.178

0.110

0.000

0.024 2.744

0.011

0.001 0.468

21

BIC3

8.224

0.405

0.000

1.996

0.076

4.587

0.000

1.300 1.210

0.000

0.024 2.744

0.000

0.011 0.468

0.467

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

102

CULV5Step5. Calculatethedeadandliveloaddemandforeachdemandtype(moment,shearand
axial),foreachloadcaseateachcriticalsectionusingEquationVI9andEquationVI10.Notethat
theliveloaddemandshaveamaximumandminimumcalculation.Tomaintainasystematic
approach,typicalpracticeistodetermineboththemaximumandminimumliveloadsforeachtype
ofdemandandselecttheminimum(controlling)valuewhencalculatingratingfactors.Calculatethe
deadandliveloaddemandateachsectionusingEquationVI9andEquationVI10whereDisthe
deadloaddemandandListheliveloaddemandrequiredforratinginEquationII1.SeeTableIX10
andTableIX11.

CULV5Step6. Afterdeterminingthedemands,useEquationVI1tocheckthatactualthrustdemandis
lowerthantheincidentalaxialloadassumedinthemomentcapacityequations.Thischeckis
performedinthelastcolumnofTableIX10andTableIX11.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

103

TABLEIX10.CULV5DEMANDSFORTOTALLOADCASE.

WBEC

3.665

ML(max)
(kft/ft)
0.160

2.451

VL(max)
(klf)
0.446

4.002

PL(max)
(klf)
0.045

WEM

0.321

0.579

0.223

0.082

0.026

0.030

4.002

0.054

1.281

OK

WTEC

3.350

0.159

0.995

1.872

0.394

0.450

4.002

0.053

1.278

OK

TEC

2.916

0.196

0.931

3.725

1.218

1.415

2.032

0.459

0.481

OK

TEM

5.337

2.068

0.617

0.437

0.242

0.331

2.032

0.474

0.468

OK

TIC1

7.254

0.098

2.150

4.598

1.110

1.307

2.032

0.467

0.475

OK

WBIC1

0.388

0.432

0.354

0.012

0.040

0.035

9.314

1.230

1.236

OK

WIM1

0.338

0.456

0.387

0.012

0.040

0.035

9.314

1.230

1.236

OK

WTIC1

0.298

0.484

0.429

0.012

0.040

0.035

9.314

1.243

1.348

OK

10

BEC

3.337

0.204

0.887

4.112

1.153

1.434

2.779

0.473

0.473

OK

Member

M101

M102

M103

M104

M105

M107

Sections

MD(kft/ft)

ML(min)
(kft/ft)
0.943

VD(klf)

VL(min)
(klf)
0.390

PD(klf)

PL(min)
(klf)
1.281

ThrustCheck
OK

11

BEM

5.798

1.982

0.587

0.475

0.055

0.129

2.779

0.475

0.469

OK

12

BIC1

8.046

0.102

1.885

5.061

1.043

1.324

2.779

0.473

0.475

OK

13

TIC2

7.107

0.075

2.112

4.161

1.406

1.179

2.044

0.467

0.465

OK

14

TIM1

3.316

1.836

0.850

0.000

0.339

0.273

2.044

0.456

0.468

OK

15

TIC3

7.107

0.075

2.112

4.161

1.406

1.179

2.044

0.467

0.465

OK

19

BIC2

7.819

0.076

1.920

4.587

1.300

1.210

2.768

0.468

0.479

OK

20

BIM1

3.670

1.803

0.800

0.000

0.178

0.110

2.768

0.457

0.469

OK

21

BIC3

7.819

0.076

1.920

4.587

1.300

1.210

2.768

0.468

0.479

OK

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

104

TABLEIX11.CULV5DEMANDFORTHEREDUCEDLATERALLOADCASE.

WBEC

2.900

ML(max)
(kft/ft)
0.135

1.246

VL(max)
(klf)
0.026

3.869

PL(max)
(klf)
0.099

WEM

0.836

0.129

0.673

0.021

0.026

0.030

3.869

0.108

1.227

OK

WTEC

2.600

0.135

0.701

0.916

0.026

0.030

3.869

0.107

1.224

OK

TEC

1.832

0.247

0.489

3.591

1.164

1.361

0.996

0.008

0.014

OK

TEM

5.761

2.240

0.445

0.571

0.188

0.385

0.996

0.007

0.001

OK

TIC1

7.492

0.000

2.248

4.731

1.164

1.361

0.996

0.000

0.008

OK

WBIC1

0.504

0.473

0.313

0.015

0.040

0.035

9.448

1.284

1.290

OK

WIM1

0.444

0.497

0.346

0.015

0.040

0.035

9.448

1.284

1.290

OK

WTIC1

0.394

0.525

0.388

0.015

0.040

0.035

9.448

1.297

1.402

OK

10

BEC

2.142

0.240

0.443

3.965

1.098

1.379

1.410

0.005

0.005

OK

Member

Sections

M101

M102

M103

M104

M105

M107

MD(kft/ft)

VD(klf)

VL(min)
(klf)
0.030

PD(klf)

PL(min)
(klf)
1.227

ThrustCheck
OK

11

BEM

6.261

2.154

0.415

0.623

0.000

0.184

1.410

0.007

0.001

OK

12

BIC1

8.315

0.003

1.984

5.209

1.098

1.379

1.410

0.005

0.007

OK

13

TIC2

7.293

0.000

2.187

4.161

1.406

1.179

1.010

0.000

0.002

OK

14

TIM1

3.130

1.761

0.925

0.000

0.339

0.273

1.010

0.011

0.001

OK

15

TIC3

7.293

0.000

2.187

4.161

1.406

1.179

1.010

0.000

0.002

OK

19

BIC2

8.022

0.000

1.996

4.587

1.300

1.210

1.396

0.000

0.011

OK

20

BIM1

3.468

1.727

0.876

0.000

0.178

0.110

1.396

0.011

0.001

OK

21

BIC3

8.022

0.000

1.996

4.587

1.300

1.210

1.396

0.000

0.011

OK

ML(min)
(kft/ft)
0.648

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

105

CULV5Step7. Thisstepgoesbeyondcalculationofdemandloadsandhastodowithcalculatingthe
culvertloadratingfactors.
Pertheculvertratingflowchart(FigureIII2)calculateInventoryandOperatingratingfactorsforeach
criticalsection,foreachdemandtype,foreachloadcasebasedonEquationII1.Thiscalculation
usesthecapacityvaluesforeachcriticalsectionasdeterminedinAppendixB.
Whencalculatingtheratingfactors,exerciseextremecareregardingthesignsforbothdemandsand
capacities.

Liveloadandcapacitymustbeinthesamesignanddirection.
Iftheliveloadanddeadloadareinoppositedirectionsorthecalculatedratingisnegative,a
checkshouldbemadetoinsurethatthestructurehasadequatecapacitytosupportthedead
load.I.E.
1.3

TableIX12andTableIX13summarizethesecalculations.

CULV5Step8. Selectthecontrolling(minimum)RatingFactorsforInventoryandOperatingLevelsfor
eachcriticalsection.TheseappearinthetworightcolumnsofTableIX12andTableIX13.

CULV5Step9. Selectthecontrolling(minimum)RatingFactorsforInventoryandOperatingLevelsfor
theentireculvert.TheseappearatthebottomofTableIX13.

CULV5Step10. Ifshearcontrolstheloadrating,theloadratershouldperformalessconservative
analysisoftheshearfailuremodebasedonshearcriticalsectionsaspertheprovisionsinSection
VI.C.Inthisexample,thecontrollingfailuremodeismoment,soadditionalshearanalysisisnot
required.

CULV5Step11. CalculatetheInventoryRatingandOperatingRatingfortheculvert.Multiplycontrolling
loadratingfactorbythetrucktractortonnage(W=20tons)accordingtoEquationII2.

Summary:

BasedonaLevel1analysisusingCULV5,theInventoryRatingisHS9whilethe
OperatingRatingisHS15.Iftheculvertconditionisfairthisrequirespostingatthe
InventoryLevelorpostingattheOperatingLevelwithaninspectionfrequencyof24
months.Iftheconditionispoor,theculvertshouldbepostedattheInventoryLeveland
inspectedmorefrequentlythanevery24months.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

106

TABLEIX12.CULV5TOTALLOADCASERATINGFACTORCALCULATIONS.

(Max)RatingFactors
Member

M101

M102

M103

M104

M105

M107

Sections

(Min)RatingFactors

ControllingRF

IRFM

ORFM

IRFV

ORFV

IRFP

ORFP

IRFM

ORFM

IRFV

ORFV

IRFP

ORFP

IRFC

ORFC

WBEC

3.20

5.35

5.36

8.95

2062.79

3443.27

0.54

0.91

6.13

10.24

72.46

120.96

0.54

0.91

WEM

1.05

1.76

150.42

251.09

1752.62

2925.53

13.01

21.71

127.09

212.14

73.88

123.32

1.05

1.76

WTEC

4.42

7.38

6.96

11.62

1767.30

2950.03

0.70

1.18

6.09

10.17

72.66

121.28

0.70

1.18

TEC

11.01

18.38

3.21

5.35

289.14

482.64

2.41

4.02

2.76

4.60

275.32

459.57

2.41

4.02

TEM

0.73

1.22

26.61

44.43

266.16

444.28

8.50

14.20

16.71

27.89

269.57

449.98

0.73

1.22

TIC1

91.58

152.87

2.70

4.51

296.40

494.76

1.47

2.46

2.29

3.83

291.98

487.38

1.47

2.46

WBIC1

2.22

3.71

96.73

161.46

72.12

120.38

4.03

6.72

110.13

183.84

71.77

119.80

2.22

3.71

WIM1

2.17

3.63

96.73

161.46

72.12

120.38

3.61

6.02

110.13

183.84

71.77

119.80

2.17

3.63

WTIC1

2.10

3.50

96.73

161.46

71.35

119.10

3.20

5.34

110.13

183.84

65.82

109.86

2.10

3.50

10

BEC

9.39

15.68

3.18

5.30

279.54

466.61

2.24

3.74

2.56

4.27

279.23

466.10

2.24

3.74

11

BEM

0.62

1.04

117.52

196.16

264.66

441.77

9.41

15.71

42.70

71.27

268.04

447.43

0.62

1.04

12

BIC1

92.69

154.72

2.60

4.34

294.24

491.16

1.76

2.94

2.05

3.43

292.90

488.91

1.76

2.94

13

TIC2

120.81

201.66

2.59

4.32

296.38

494.73

1.54

2.58

3.09

5.16

297.59

496.75

1.54

2.58

14

TIM1

1.48

2.48

18.23

30.42

276.65

461.79

4.75

7.93

21.22

35.42

269.56

449.95

1.48

2.48

15

TIC3

120.81

201.66

2.32

3.87

296.38

494.73

1.54

2.58

2.76

4.61

297.59

496.75

1.54

2.58

19

BIC2

124.96

208.59

2.60

4.34

297.20

496.10

1.81

3.01

2.80

4.67

289.98

484.04

1.81

3.01

20

BIM1

1.39

2.32

34.71

57.94

275.10

459.20

5.31

8.87

52.66

87.90

268.06

447.45

1.39

2.32

21

BIC3

124.96

208.59

2.31

3.85

297.20

496.10

1.81

3.01

2.48

4.14

289.98

484.04

1.81

3.01

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

107

TABLEIX13.CULV5REDUCEDLATERALLOADCASERATINGFACTORS.

(Max)RatingFactors
Member

Sections

M101

M102

M103

M104

M105

M107

(Min)RatingFactors

ControllingRF

IRFM

ORFM

IRFV

ORFV

IRFP

ORFP

IRFM

ORFM

IRFV

ORFV

IRFP

ORFP

IRFC

ORFC

WBEC

21.04

35.12

119.83

200.02

938.44

1566.47

1.50

2.50

153.60

256.40

75.72

126.39

1.50

2.50

WEM

10.10

16.86

149.02

248.74

877.05

1464.00

3.28

5.47

128.31

214.18

77.20

128.86

3.28

5.47

WTEC

19.73

32.94

169.64

283.16

872.16

1455.83

1.64

2.74

110.44

184.34

75.93

126.75

1.64

2.74

TEC

25.10

41.89

3.42

5.71

15501.32

25875.28

5.75

9.60

2.92

4.88

9236.45

15417.76

2.92

4.88

TEM

0.56

0.94

34.68

57.90

18111.49

30232.26

12.36

20.64

14.16

23.63

126780.46

211625.85

0.56

0.94

TIC1

NA

NA

2.51

4.19

NA

NA

1.35

2.25

2.14

3.58

19685.50

32859.64

1.35

2.25

WBIC1

1.88

3.15

96.76

161.52

69.02

115.22

4.78

7.98

110.09

183.76

68.70

114.68

1.88

3.15

WIM1

1.87

3.12

96.76

161.52

69.02

115.22

4.22

7.04

110.09

183.76

68.70

114.68

1.87

3.12

WTIC1

1.82

3.04

96.76

161.52

68.32

114.04

3.69

6.15

110.09

183.76

63.22

105.54

1.82

3.04

10

BEC

26.68

44.54

3.41

5.70

29204.91

48749.74

5.92

9.89

2.72

4.55

26211.86

43753.65

2.72

4.55

11

BEM

0.45

0.74

NA

NA

18076.06

30173.12

13.98

23.33

29.46

49.17

126532.45

211211.85

0.45

0.74

12

BIC1

3235.59

5400.95

2.39

3.99

29862.05

49846.65

1.59

2.65

1.91

3.19

20399.45

34051.38

1.59

2.65

13

TIC2

NA

NA

2.59

4.32

NA

NA

1.44

2.41

3.09

5.16

73264.68

122295.66

1.44

2.41

14

TIM1

1.61

2.69

18.23

30.42

11524.71

19237.40

4.24

7.08

21.22

35.42

126771.78

211611.35

1.61

2.69

15

TIC3

NA

NA

2.32

3.87

NA

NA

1.44

2.41

2.76

4.61

73264.68

122295.66

1.44

2.41

19

BIC2

NA

NA

2.60

4.34

NA

NA

1.68

2.80

2.80

4.67

11997.94

20027.33

1.68

2.80

20

BIM1

1.52

2.54

34.71

57.94

11503.68

19202.30

4.71

7.86

52.66

87.90

126540.53

211225.35

1.52

2.54

21

BIC3

NA

NA

2.31

3.85

NA

NA

1.68

2.80

2.48

4.14

11997.94

20027.33

1.68

2.80

ControllingRatingFactor

BEMM(max)RLL

0.45

0.74

LoadRating

(HSequivalent)

15

TxDOT

AppendixD.

CulvertRatingGuide

LEVEL2:RISA2DWITHSPRINGSEXAMPLE

109

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

110

RISA2DSpringStep1.
CalculateallloadsusingEquationVI2,EquationVI4,EquationVI5,Equation
VI6andEquationVI7.ThemagnitudesoftheseloadsaresummarizedinTableIX14.
TABLEIX14.RISA2DLOADS.

Type

Abbr.

Value

Units

verticaldeadload

DLv

0.720 ksf

horizontaldeadloadattop

DLhT

0.384 ksf

horizontaldeadloadatbottom

DLhB

0.851 ksf

horizontalliveload

LLh

0.120 ksf

verticalliveloadontop

LLvT

0.230 ksf

RISA2DSpringStep2.
CreateamodelconsistentwithFigureVI2andFigureVI10:
a. Disablecrackedsectionsandsheardeformationswithintheglobalparameters.Reduceoutputto
threepointspermember.ScreenshotsshowingthisstepareseeninFigureIX7.

FIGUREIX.7.RISA2DGLOBALPARAMETERS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

b.

111

LayoutcornernodesasseeninFigureIX8.

FIGUREIX.8.RISA2DCORNERJOINTCOORDINATES.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

c.

112

Connectnodesusingmemberswithrectangularcrosssectionsandappropriateconcrete
propertiesaccordingtoTableII1andTableIV1.Drawmemberscounterclockwisearoundthe
centeroftheculverttoproduceconsistentmomentsignconventionsasperFigureVI15.Figure
IX9showsthedrawmemberboxusedtocreatethemembers.FigureIX10illustratesafew
waystocheckthatbeamdirectionsaredefinedproperly.

FIGUREIX.9.RISA2DMEMBERCREATION.

FIGUREIX.10.RISA2DMODELLAYOUTCHECK.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

d.

113

Usingthesplitmemberfunction,addsupportnodestothebottommembersandsetboundary
conditionsaccordingtoFigureVI11withspringconstantsfromEquationVI11.TableIX15
summarizesthespringsupportcalculations.FigureIX11andFigureIX12showhowtousethe
splitmemberfunctionandtheboundaryconditioncontrolstoproperlyrestrainthestructure.
TABLEIX15.SPRINGSUPPORTSCALCULATIONS.

Type
springspacing
modulusofsubgradereaction
interiorspringconstant
exteriorspringconstant

Abbr.
s
k

Value
12.8
150
23.0
11.5

Units
in
pci
kli
kli

FIGUREIX.11.RISA2DMODELADDINGTHENODESUSINGTHEJUSTADDFUNCTION

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

114

FIGUREIX.12.RISA2DMODELDEFININGTHEBOUNDARYCONDITIONS

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

115

RISA2DSpringStep3.
ApplytheloadsaccordingtoFigureVI10inseparateBasicLoadCases.Figure
IX13depictslabelingthethreestaticBasicLoadCases.

FIGUREIX.13.RISA2DIDENTIFICATIONOFALLLOADGROUPSANDUSINGGRAVITYFEATURE

a.

VerticalDeadLoad,DLv(EquationVI2).Besuretoincludetheselfweightgravityloadingby
includingafactorof(1)intheYgravitydirection.FigureIX13showswheregravityisactivated.
FigureIX14showshowtodefinethedistributeddeadload.

FIGUREIX.14.RISA2DAPPLICATIONOFVERTICALDEADLOAD(DLV)

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

b.

116

HorizontalDeadLoad,DLh(EquationVI4andEquationVI5).FigureIX15showsapplyingthis
loadinRISA2D.

FIGUREIX.15.RISA2DAPPLICATIONOFHORIZONTALDEADLOAD(DLH)

c.

HorizontalLiveLoad,LLh(EquationVI6).FigureIX16illustratesthisloadapplication.

FIGUREIX.16.RISA2DAPPLICATIONOFHORIZONTALLIVELOAD(LLH)

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

117

RISA2DSpringStep4.
VerticalLiveLoad,LLVT(EquationVI7)mustbecalculatedandplacedasa
movingloadasseeninFigureVI12,FigureVI13andFigureVI14.Themovingloadwillbeapproximated
bycreatingamovingloadpatternof10equivalent,uniformlyspaced,pointloadsoverthelengthofeach
loadasseeninFigureVI16,FigureVI17andFigureVI18.Thesefiguresshowthemovingload
discretizedandgroupedintermsofthe10equivalent,uniformlyspaced,pointloads.ChecktheBoth
Waysboxtoinsurethattheliveloadmovesfromlefttorightandrighttoleft.

FigureIX17throughFigureIX20presentsaseriesoffourimagesdepictingthisprocess.Thefirstfigure
showshowtocreateamovingloadinRISA.Thenextshowshowtoaddapatternanddefinetheload
case.Thethirdimageshowstheapplicationofthemovingloadtothestructure.Thefourthimageisan
animatedgraphicthatfacilitatescheckingtomakesurethemovingloadisproperlyapplied.

FIGUREIX.17.RISA2DHOWTOCREATEAMOVINGLOAD

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

FIGUREIX.18.RISA2DADDINGAPATTERNANDDEFININGTHEMOVINGLOADCASE

118

FIGUREIX.19.RISA2DAPPLYTHEMOVINGLOADTOTHESTRUCTURE

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

FIGUREIX.20.RISA2DANIMATEDGRAPHICTOCHECKTHEMOVINGLOADCASE

119

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

120

RISA2DSpringStep5.
Usethesplitmemberfunctiontosplitthememberstocreatethecritical
sectionnodes.RelabelandsortthecriticalmembersusingaconventionsimilartotheCULV5naming
convention.SeeFigureVI19.
FigureIX21throughFigureIX23presentsaseriesofthreeimagesdepictingtheprocess.Thefirstimage
showshowtocreatethecriticalsections.Thesecondimageillustratestheprocessofrelabelingthe
nodestorepresentthecriticalsections.Thethirdimageshowsacheckdemonstratingthattherelabeled
beamelementsarenowcorrectlylabeledandcanbesortedbythenewmembername.Thisfacilitates
subsequentdataanalysis.

FIGUREIX.21.RISA2DSPLITMEMBERTOCREATECORNERCRITICALSECTIONNODES.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

FIGUREIX.22.RISA2DRELABELNODESTOREPRESENTCRITICALSECTIONS.

121

FIGUREIX.23.RISA2DRELABELEDBEAMELEMENTSTOFACILITATESORTBYMEMBERNAMES.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

RISA2DSpringStep6.
a.

b.

c.

d.

122

CreatefourLoadCombinationsfordeadandlivedemands.

UsethefollowingBasicLoadCaseFactorsfortheTotalLoadCasedeadloaddemands
DLvfactorof1.0
DLhfactorof1.0
UsethefollowingBasicLoadCaseFactorsfortheTotalLoadCaseliveloaddemands:
LLvfactorof1.0
LLhfactorof1.0
UsethefollowingBasicLoadCaseFactorsfortheReducedLateralLoadCasedeadloaddemands:
DLvfactorof1.0
DLhfactorof0.5
UsethefollowingBasicLoadCaseFactorstheReducedLateralLoadCaseliveloaddemands:
LLvfactorof1.0
LLhfactorof0.0

FigureIX24showshowtodefinethefourloadcombinationsinRISA2D

FIGUREIX.24.RISA2DCREATIONOFLOADCOMBINATIONS

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

123

RISA2DSpringStep7.
UseRISA2Dtosolveformoment,shearandaxialdemand,deadandliveloads
separately.Thiswillrequirefourseparatecomputerruns,oneforeachloadcombination.
FigureIX25showsthesolvecommandtoperformthedemandcalculations.Thisparticularimage
appliestotheTotalLoadCasefordeadload.Threemorecomputerrunswillhavetobemade:TotalLoad
Caseliveload,ReducedLateralLoadcasedeadload,andReducedLateralLoadcaseliveload.

FIGUREIX.25.RISA2DSOLVINGFORDEADLOADDEMAND,TOTALLOADCASE.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

124

FigureIX26illustratestheRISAoutputfromthesecomputerruns.ThisparticularimageshowsRISA
memberoutputforTotalLoadCaseliveloadcalculations.Notethatthisoutputincludesbothmaximum
andminimumvaluesateachsection(node)ofthemodel.Allfourloadcombinationswillhavetobe
performed.Thislevelofoutputfacilitatessubsequentdataanalysis.

FIGUREIX.26.RISA2DOUTPUTSHOWINGMEMBERSECTIONFORCESFORDETERMININGLIVELOADDEMAND.

RISA2DSpringStep8.
Recordthedeadloadandthemaximumandminimumliveloaddemandsfor
eachcriticalsectionforbothloadcasesfromthememberforcestable.
ThesedataareobtainedfromtheRISAmembersectionforcetableillustratedinFigureIX26.TableIX16
andTableIX17summarizedataforeachcriticalsection,foreachloadcase(totalandreducedlateral),for
eachdemandtype(moment,shearandthrust).Notethatbecausetheliveloaddataareformenvelope
solutions,theseincludebothmaximumandminimumvalues.
RISA2DSpringStep9.
Afterdeterminingthedemands,useEquationVI1toverifythatactualthrust
demandislowerthantheincidentalaxialloadassumedinthemomentcapacityequations.Thisisshown
inthefarrighthandcolumnofTableIX16andTableIX17

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

125

TABLEIX16.RISA2DTOTALLOADCASEDEMANDS.

M102

M103

M104

M105

M107

PD(klf)

WBEC

3.509

4.546

PL(max)
(klf)
0.006

WEM

0.471

0.492

0.086

0.062

0.062

0.082

4.251

0.006

1.227

OK

WTEC

3.092

0.132

0.971

1.854

0.357

0.501

3.955

0.006

1.227

OK

TEC

2.764

0.251

0.953

3.679

1.139

0.006

2.013

0.405

0.549

OK

TEM

5.198

1.819

0.479

0.495

0.307

0.404

2.013

0.405

0.549

OK

TIC1

7.711

0.114

2.214

4.669

0.054

1.372

2.013

0.405

0.549

OK

WBIC1

0.103

0.263

0.187

0.099

0.107

0.103

9.952

0.166

2.038

OK

WIM1

0.242

0.264

0.216

0.099

0.107

0.103

9.656

0.166

2.038

OK

WTIC1

0.586

0.630

0.570

0.099

0.107

0.103

9.361

0.166

2.038

OK

10

BEC

3.454

0.316

0.755

3.832

0.053

1.002

2.797

0.386

0.530

OK

Member

M101

TotalLoadCaseDemands
VL(max)
VL(min)
VD(klf)
(klf)
(klf)
2.462
0.482
0.338

ML(max)
(kft/ft)
0.203

Sections

MD(kft/ft)

ML(min)
(kft/ft)
0.805

PL(min)
(klf)
1.227

ThrustCheck
OK

11

BEM

4.716

1.210

0.172

0.786

0.207

0.111

2.797

0.386

0.530

OK

12

BIC1

6.952

0.466

1.696

4.388

0.972

0.111

2.797

0.386

0.530

OK

13

TIC2

7.228

0.244

2.338

4.174

1.328

0.130

1.914

0.374

0.580

OK

14

TIM1

3.206

1.549

0.432

0.000

0.388

0.388

1.914

0.374

0.580

OK

15

TIC3

7.228

0.244

2.338

4.174

0.130

1.328

1.914

0.374

0.580

OK

19

BIC2

7.104

0.352

1.608

4.355

0.056

0.889

2.896

0.355

0.561

OK

20

BIM1

3.780

0.751

0.002

0.470

0.118

0.118

2.896

0.355

0.561

OK

21

BIC3

7.104

0.352

1.608

4.355

0.889

0.056

2.896

0.355

0.561

OK

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

126

TABLEIX17.RISA2DREDUCEDLATERALLOADCASEDEMANDS.

WBEC

2.780

WEM

0.658

0.052

0.527

0.007

0.061

0.081

4.101

0.065

1.168

OK

WTEC

2.307

0.167

0.682

0.889

0.061

0.081

3.806

0.065

1.168

OK

TEC

1.620

0.191

0.504

3.530

1.082

0.065

0.969

0.061

0.081

OK

Member

Sections

M101

M102

M103

M104

M105

M107

ReducedLateralLoadCaseDemands
VL(max)
VL(min)
VD(klf)
PD(klf)
(klf)
(klf)
1.269
0.061
0.081
4.397

ML(max)
(kft/ft)
0.084

MD(kft/ft)

ML(min)
(kft/ft)
0.516

PL(max)
(klf)
0.065

PL(min)
(klf)
1.168

ThrustCheck
OK

TEM

5.595

1.987

0.315

0.644

0.248

0.463

0.969

0.061

0.081

OK

TIC1

8.060

0.003

2.350

4.818

0.000

1.431

0.969

0.061

0.081

OK

WBIC1

0.128

0.254

0.195

0.127

0.116

0.093

10.101

0.104

2.098

OK

WIM1

0.317

0.297

0.186

0.127

0.116

0.093

9.806

0.104

2.098

OK

WTIC1

0.762

0.693

0.503

0.127

0.116

0.093

9.510

0.104

2.098

OK

10

BEC

2.268

0.133

0.302

3.648

0.016

0.930

1.437

0.081

0.061

OK

11

BEM

4.992

1.310

0.045

0.902

0.250

0.059

1.437

0.081

0.061

OK

12

BIC1

7.104

0.373

1.757

4.459

1.000

0.059

1.437

0.081

0.061

OK

13

TIC2

7.434

0.153

2.418

4.174

1.328

0.127

0.841

0.101

0.100

OK

14

TIM1

3.001

1.468

0.511

0.000

0.388

0.388

0.841

0.101

0.100

OK

15

TIC3

7.434

0.153

2.418

4.174

0.127

1.328

0.841

0.101

0.100

OK

19

BIC2

7.293

0.272

1.679

4.425

0.047

0.917

1.564

0.100

0.101

OK

20

BIM1

3.781

0.753

0.043

0.479

0.118

0.118

1.564

0.100

0.101

OK

21

BIC3

7.293

0.272

1.679

4.425

0.917

0.047

1.564

0.100

0.101

OK

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

127

RISA2DSpringStep10.
Thisstepgoesbeyondcalculationofdemandloadsandhastodowith
calculatingtheculvertloadrating.Pertheculvertratingflowchart(FigureIII2)proceedtocalculate
InventoryandOperatingratingfactorsforeachcriticalsection,foreachdemandtype,foreachloadcase
perEquationII1.Thiscalculationusesthecapacityvaluesforeachcriticalsectionasdeterminedin
AppendixB.
Whencalculatingtheratingfactors,exerciseextremecareregardingthesignsforbothdemandsand
capacities.

Liveloadandcapacitymustbeinthesamesignanddirection.
Iftheliveloadanddeadloadareinoppositedirectionsorthecalculatedratingisnegative,a
checkshouldbemadetoinsurethatthestructurehasadequatecapacitytosupportthedead
load.I.E.
1.3

RISA2DSpringStep11.
Selectthecontrollinginventoryandoperatingratingfactorsforeachsection.
TheseappearinthetworightcolumnsofTableIX18andTableIX19.
RISA2DSpringStep12.
bottomofTableIX19.

Selecttheoverallcontrollingratingfactorsfortheculvert.Theseappearatthe

Ifshearcontrolstheloadrating,theloadratershouldperformaless
RISA2DSpringStep13.
conservativeanalysisoftheshearfailuremodebasedonshearcriticalsectionsaspertheprovisionsin
SectionVI.C.Inthisexample,thecontrollingfailuremodeismoment,soadditionalshearanalysisisnot
required.
CalculatetheInventoryandOperatingRatingsperEquationII2.Multiply
RISA2DSpringStep14.
controllingloadratingfactorbythetrucktractortonnage(W=20tons).Theseappearatthebottomof
TableIX19.
Summary:
BasedonaLevel2analysisusingRISA2Dwithspringsandmediumsoil,the
InventoryRatingisHS14whiletheOperatingRatingisHS23.Iftheculvertconditionisfairthisrequires
noposting.Iftheconditionispoor,theculvertshouldbepostedattheInventoryLevelandinspected
morefrequentlythanevery24months.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

128

TABLEIX18.RISA2DTOTALLOADCASERATINGFACTORCALCULATIONS.

(Max)RatingFactors
Member

M101

M102

M103

M104

M105

M107

(Min)RatingFactors

ControllingRF

Sections

IRFM

ORFM

IRFV

ORFV

IRFP

ORFP

IRFM

ORFM

IRFV

ORFV

IRFP

ORFP

IRFC

ORFC

1 WBEC

2.98

4.98

4.95

8.27

15416.62

25733.89

0.75

1.26

7.06

11.79

75.39

125.84

0.75

1.26

2 WEM

1.06

1.76

62.89

104.97

15748.74

26288.28

34.77

58.04

46.64

77.86

77.01

128.55

1.06

1.76

3 WTEC

6.48

10.82

7.71

12.86

15475.63

25832.39

0.88

1.47

5.49

9.17

75.68

126.32

0.88

1.47

4 TEC

9.89

16.52

3.49

5.83

327.30

546.33

2.61

4.35

1332.79

2224.73

241.45

403.03

2.61

4.35

5 TEM

0.88

1.46

21.09

35.21

311.53

520.02

10.78

18.00

13.60

22.71

229.82

383.62

0.88

1.46

6 TIC1

81.84

136.60

166.22

277.46

341.80

570.54

1.38

2.30

2.18

3.64

252.15

420.89

1.38

2.30

7 WBIC1

4.77

7.97

35.54

59.32

532.08

888.16

6.05

10.10

38.07

63.55

43.34

72.34

4.77

7.97

8 WIM1

3.97

6.63

35.54

59.32

533.14

889.94

6.20

10.34

38.07

63.55

43.43

72.49

3.97

6.63

9 WTIC1

1.34

2.23

35.54

59.32

534.21

891.72

2.71

4.52

38.07

63.55

43.51

72.63

1.34

2.23

10 BEC

6.55

10.94

65.98

110.14

342.19

571.20

2.74

4.58

3.49

5.83

249.22

416.00

2.74

4.58

11 BEM

1.56

2.60

27.58

46.03

325.65

543.59

28.35

47.32

56.43

94.19

237.17

395.90

1.56

2.60

12 BIC1

19.04

31.79

3.65

6.10

360.29

601.41

2.45

4.08

75.87

126.64

262.40

438.01

2.45

4.08

13 TIC2

37.05

61.84

2.77

4.62

370.29

618.10

1.43

2.39

63.79

106.49

238.77

398.57

1.43

2.39

14 TIM1

1.80

3.01

15.93

26.58

337.51

563.39

9.19

15.34

14.93

24.92

217.64

363.29

1.80

3.01

15 TIC3

37.05

61.84

66.77

111.45

370.29

618.10

1.43

2.39

2.48

4.14

238.77

398.57

1.43

2.39

19 BIC2

25.47

42.52

156.93

261.95

391.59

653.65

2.52

4.21

3.58

5.98

247.80

413.63

2.52

4.21

20 BIM1

3.26

5.43

49.98

83.42

353.92

590.78

2157.34

3601.11

51.48

85.93

223.96

373.84

3.26

5.43

21 BIC3

2.52

42.52

4.02

6.70

391.59

653.65

2.52

4.21

150.03

250.44

247.80

413.63

2.52

4.21

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

129

TABLEIX19.RISA2DREDUCEDLATERALLOADCASERATINGFACTORS.

Member

M101

M102

M103

M104

M105

M107

Sections

IRFM

ORFM

IRFV

ORFV

IRFP

ORFP

IRFM

ORFM

IRFV

ORFV

IRFP

ORFP

IRFC

ORFC

1 WBEC

33.08

55.21

50.85

84.87

1424.45

2377.73

2.02

3.37

57.06

95.25

79.27

132.32

2.02

3.37

2 WEM

23.00

38.39

63.24

105.56

1455.11

2428.92

4.39

7.33

47.73

79.67

80.98

135.17

4.39

7.33

3 WTEC

14.94

24.94

72.04

120.25

1429.89

2386.82

1.94

3.25

41.10

68.61

79.57

132.83

1.94

3.25

4 TEC

29.74

49.64

3.76

6.27

2183.29

3644.42

6.29

10.50

121.65

203.07

1644.21

2744.56

3.76

6.27

5 TEM

0.68

1.14

26.47

44.19

2078.63

3469.71

17.15

28.63

11.68

19.49

1565.39

2612.99

0.68

1.14

6 TIC1

948.45

1583.18

NA

NA

2279.58

3805.15

1.21

2.02

2.03

3.39

1716.72

2865.60

1.21

2.02

7 WBIC1

5.00

8.35

32.64

54.48

848.42

1416.20

5.73

9.56

42.34

70.68

42.06

70.20

5.00

8.35

8 WIM1

3.38

5.64

32.64

54.48

850.12

1419.04

7.44

12.41

42.34

70.68

42.14

70.34

3.38

5.64

9 WTIC1

1.06

1.77

32.64

54.48

851.82

1421.89

3.28

5.47

42.34

70.68

42.23

70.48

1.06

1.77

10 BEC

45.63

76.16

522.77

872.63

1640.75

2738.78

9.21

15.37

3.88

6.47

2178.69

3636.74

3.88

6.47

11 BEM

1.31

2.19

22.55

37.65

1561.93

2607.21

112.02

186.98

107.34

179.18

2074.03

3462.04

1.31

2.19

12 BIC1

24.04

40.12

3.51

5.86

1727.02

2882.79

2.31

3.86

143.46

239.46

2293.25

3827.97

2.31

3.86

13 TIC2

59.89

99.97

2.77

4.62

1377.54

2299.42

1.33

2.22

65.30

109.00

1391.31

2322.42

1.33

2.22

14 TIM1

1.98

3.31

15.93

26.58

1256.17

2096.84

7.53

12.57

14.93

24.92

1268.73

2117.80

1.98

3.31

15 TIC3

59.89

99.97

68.34

114.08

1377.54

2299.42

1.33

2.22

2.48

4.14

1391.31

2322.42

1.33

2.22

19 BIC2

33.38

55.72

187.87

313.60

1398.12

2333.79

2.35

3.92

3.43

5.72

1384.28

2310.68

2.35

3.92

20 BIM1

3.25

5.42

49.93

83.35

1264.40

2110.57

100.36

167.52

51.52

86.00

1251.88

2089.68

3.25

5.42

21 BIC3

33.38

55.72

3.85

6.42

1398.12

2333.79

2.35

3.92

179.65

299.88

1384.28

2310.68

2.35

3.92

ControllingRatingFactor

TEMM(max)RLL

0.68

1.14

LoadRating

(HSequivalent)

14

23

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

AppendixE.

LEVEL3:RISA2DWITHLEFEEXAMPLE

131

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

132

RISA2DLEFEStep1. ModifythemodelcreatedfortheLevel2analysistomatchFigureVI20throughthe
followingsteps:
a.

RemoveallLevel2boundaryconditionsandloads.FigureIX27showstheculvertmodelwithout
loadsorboundaryconditions.

FIGUREIX.27.RISA2DWITHLEFEREMOVEBCANDLOADS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

b.

133

Placenewnodesattheoutsidecornersofthesoilareaaswellasattheedgesdirectlyabove,
belowandoutsidetheoutsidecornersoftheculvertaccordingtoFigureVI20.FigureIX28
showsthenewnodelocations

FIGUREIX.28.RISA2DWITHLEFENEWNODELOCATIONS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

c.

134

ConnectthenodesfromRISA2DLEFEStep1.busingtheplatedrawingtooltomakeeightlarge
soilelementssurroundingtheculvertandfillingthesoilarea.
i. TheelementsshouldhavethematerialpropertiesfromTableIV3.FigureIX29
illustrateshowtodefineanewmaterialproperty.

FIGUREIX.29.RISA2DWITHLEFESOILMATERIALPROPERTYDEFINITIONS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

135

ii. Theelementsshouldbe12in.thick.FigureIX30showswheretodefinetheplate
properties.FigureIX31showstheculvertwiththedrawnplates.

FIGUREIX.30.RISA2DWITHLEFEDEFINEPLATEPROPERTIES.

FIGUREIX.31.RISA2DWITHLEFEDRAWPLATES.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

d.

136

Usethesubmeshtooltoautomaticallysubmeshthelargeplates.Besuretospecifya
minimumof10elementsalongeachculvertspan.FigureIX32showswheretodefinetheextent
ofthesubmeshing.FigureIX33showsthesubmeshedsoilstructureinteractionmodel.

FIGUREIX.32.RISA2DWITHLEFEPLATESUBMESHINGCONTROLS.

FIGUREIX.33.RISA2DWITHLEFEPLATESUBMESH.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

e.

137

Createathinsoilbeamatthegroundsurface,runningfromthetopleftcornerofthesoilarea
tothetoprightcorner.FigureIX34showswherethesoilmemberisdefined.ThisallowsRISA
torunamovingloadacrossthetopsurface.

FIGUREIX.34.RISA2DWITHLEFESOIL"BEAM".

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

f.

138

Settheboundaryconditionsfortheoutsideedgeofsoilmesh.FigureIX35showshowtodefine
theboundaryconditions.

FIGUREIX.35.RISA2DWITHLEFEBOUNDARYCONDITIONS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

139

RISA2DLEFEStep2. EstablishtheRISAloadcasesfordeadloadandliveload.
a.

Thedealloadissimplya1gravityloadingintheGlobalYdirectionFigureIX36illustratesthis
point.

FIGUREIX.36.RISA2DWITHLEFEBASICLOADCASES.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

b.

140

TheliveloadisamovingloadofmagnitudeandspacingasillustratedinFigureVI21and
calculatedinEquationVI12alongthesoilbeamcreatedinstep2.e.TableIX20showsthe
magnitudeoftheliveloads.FigureIX37showhowtodefinethemovingliveload.FigureIX38
showstheanimationofthemovingliveload.ChecktheBothWaysboxtoensurethattheload
movesfromrighttoleftandfromlefttoright.
TABLEIX20.RISA2DWITHLEFELIVELOADCALCULATIONS.

Type

Abbr.

Value(klf)

verticalliveload(16k)

LLvT

2.605

verticalliveload(4k)

LLvT

0.651

FIGUREIX.37.RISA2DWITHLEFEMOVINGLIVELOADDEFINITION.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

141

FIGUREIX.38.RISA2DWITHLEFEMOVINGLIVELOADANIMATION.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

142

RISA2DLEFEStep3. UseRISA2Dtosolveformoment,shearandaxialdeadandliveloadsseparately.This
willrequiretwoseparatecomputerruns:onefordeadload,oneforliveload.FigureIX39illustrates
usingthesolutionboxtosolveforthedeadloaddemands.FigureIX40showsthememberresultsforthe
deadloaddemands.

FIGUREIX.39.RISA2DWITHLEFESOLVEFORDEADLOADDEMANDS.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

143

FIGUREIX.40.RISA2DWITHLEFERESULTSFORDEADLOADDEMANDS.

RISA2DLEFEStep4. Recordthemaximumandminimumdemandsateachcriticalsectionfromthemember
forcetable.
ThedataareobtainedfromtheRISAmembersectionforcetableillustratedinFigureIX40.TableIX21
summarizesdataforeachcriticalsection,foreachdemandtype(moment,shearandthrust).Notethat
becausetheliveloaddataareformenvelopesolutions,theseincludebothmaximumandminimum
values.
RISA2DLEFEStep5. Afterdeterminingthedemands,useEquationVI1toverifythatactualthrustdemandis
lowerthantheincidentalaxialloadassumedinthemomentcapacityequations.Thischeckisshowinthe
farrightcolumninTableIX21

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

144

TABLEIX21.RISA2DWITHLEFEDEMANDS.

Member

M101

M102

M103

3.816

ML(max)
(kft/ft)
0.123

ML(min)
(kft/ft)
0.584

2.925

VL(max)
(klf)
0.369

VL(min)
(klf)
0.068

M105

M107

PL(min)
(klf)
1.219

0.575

0.115

0.050

0.228

0.057

0.065

7.192

0.041

1.425

OK

3 WTEC

1.760

0.066

0.704

1.358

0.021

0.370

5.246

0.041

1.398

OK

4 TEC

1.528

0.105

0.659

2.657

0.826

0.020

0.765

0.187

0.273

OK

5 TEM

2.879

1.126

0.067

0.417

0.174

0.243

0.308

0.528

0.333

OK

6 TIC1

6.378

0.018

1.480

4.128

0.017

1.031

1.251

0.442

0.418

OK

7 WBIC1

0.204

8 WIM1

0.119

0.289

0.245

0.092

0.102

0.111

10.242

0.028

2.047

OK

0.112

0.098

0.092

0.102

0.111

9.946

0.028

2.047

OK

9 WTIC1

0.442

0.470

0.485

0.092

0.102

0.111

9.651

0.028

2.047

OK

3.776

0.158

0.562

4.187

0.004

0.605

2.752

0.153

0.357

OK

MD(kft/ft)

1 WBEC
2 WEM

10 BEC
M104

7.553

PL(max)
(klf)
0.027

Sections

VD(klf)

PD(klf)

ThrustCheck
OK

11 BEM

3.801

0.579

0.001

0.527

0.090

0.016

1.791

0.284

0.358

OK

12 BIC1

5.796

0.079

1.315

4.244

0.847

0.027

2.451

0.154

0.355

OK

13 TIC2

5.956

0.048

1.419

3.929

1.015

0.030

1.221

0.408

0.386

OK

14 TIM1

2.339

1.065

0.076

0.175

0.214

0.214

0.786

0.505

0.397

OK

15 TIC3

5.956

0.048

1.419

3.929

0.030

1.015

1.221

0.408

0.386

OK

19 BIC2

6.036

0.112

1.385

4.248

0.020

0.856

2.572

0.198

0.379

OK

20 BIM1

3.092

0.544

0.000

0.319

0.055

0.055

2.061

0.279

0.356

OK

21 BIC3

6.036

0.112

1.385

4.247

0.856

0.020

2.572

0.198

0.378

OK

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

145

RISA2DLEFEStep6. Thisstepgoesbeyondcalculationofdemandloadsandhastodowithcalculatingthe
culvertloadrating.Pertheculvertratingflowchart(FigureIII2)proceedtocalculateInventoryand
Operatingratingfactorsforeachcriticalsection,foreachdemandtype,foreachloadcaseperEquation
II1.
Whencalculatingtheratingfactors,exerciseextremecareregardingthesignsforbothdemandsand
capacities.
a.
b.

Liveloadandcapacitymustbeinthesamesignanddirection.
Iftheliveloadanddeadloadareinoppositedirectionsorthecalculatedratingisnegative,a
checkshouldbemadetoinsurethatthestructurehasadequatecapacitytosupportthedead
load.I.E.
1.3

TableIX22summarizesthisstep.

RISA2DLEFEStep7. Selectthecontrollinginventoryandoperatingratingfactorsforeachsection.Thisis
showninthefarrightcolumnofTableIX22.
RISA2DLEFEStep8. Selecttheoverallcontrollingratingfactorsfortheculvert.Thisisshowninthebottom
righthandcornerofTableIX22.
RISA2DLEFEStep9. Ifshearcontrolstheloadrating,theloadratershouldperformalessconservative
analysisoftheshearfailuremodebasedonshearcriticalsectionsaspertheprovisionsofSectionVI.C.In
thisexample,thecontrollingfailuremodeismoment,soadditionalshearanalysisisnotrequired.
RISA2DLEFEStep10.
CalculatetheInventoryandOperatingRatingsperEquationII2.Thisisshown
inthebottomrighthandcornerofTableIX22.
Summary:
BasedonaLevel3analysisusingRISA2DwithLEFEandmediumsoils,theInventory
RatingisHS14whiletheOperatingRatingisHS24.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

146

TABLEIX22.RISA2DWITHLEFELOADRATING.

(Max)RatingFactors
Member

M101

M102

M103

M104

M105

M107

(Min)RatingFactors

ControllingRF

Sections

IRFM

ORFM

IRFV

ORFV

IRFP

ORFP

IRFM

ORFM

IRFV

ORFV

IRFP

ORFP

IRFC

ORFC

1 WBEC

27.64

46.13

5.72

9.54

3359.20

5607.27

0.72

1.21

82.56

137.81

74.40

124.20

0.72

1.21

2 WEM

3.98

6.64

65.35

109.09

2261.72

3775.33

61.05

101.90

61.51

102.68

65.07

108.62

3.98

6.64

3 WTEC

32.84

54.82

222.64

371.63

2245.86

3748.86

2.35

3.92

8.24

13.75

65.87

109.95

2.35

3.92

4 TEC

53.57

89.43

5.55

9.27

712.85

1189.91

4.89

8.17

369.22

616.32

488.29

815.07

4.89

8.17

5 TEM

2.65

4.43

36.95

61.67

240.89

402.11

56.34

94.05

22.81

38.08

381.96

637.58

2.65

4.43

6 TIC1

473.93

791.09

508.94

849.53

314.22

524.51

2.60

4.35

3.22

5.37

332.26

554.62

2.60

4.35

7 WBIC1

4.55

7.60

37.32

62.30

3148.25

5255.15

4.37

7.30

35.29

58.90

43.06

71.88

4.37

7.30

8 WIM1

10.02

16.72

37.32

62.30

3154.58

5265.73

12.90

21.54

35.29

58.90

43.15

72.03

10.02

16.72

9 WTIC1

1.98

3.30

37.32

62.30

3160.89

5276.26

3.01

5.02

35.29

58.90

43.24

72.17

1.98

3.30

10 BEC

44.13

73.66

2171.81

3625.26

863.48

1441.35

3.34

5.58

5.43

9.06

370.06

617.72

3.34

5.58

11 BEM

4.20

7.01

65.15

108.74

444.73

742.36

4327.27

7223.21

381.78

637.28

352.80

588.91

4.20

7.01

12 BIC1

103.57

172.88

4.29

7.17

904.42

1509.69

3.68

6.15

308.71

515.31

392.34

654.91

3.68

6.15

13 TIC2

172.46

287.87

3.77

6.29

340.45

568.29

2.89

4.83

271.55

453.28

359.85

600.68

2.89

4.83

14 TIM1

3.11

5.19

29.36

49.01

251.30

419.48

45.41

75.81

26.58

44.37

319.66

533.59

3.11

5.19

15 TIC3

172.46

287.87

284.42

474.77

340.45

568.29

2.89

4.83

3.39

5.66

359.85

600.68

2.89

4.83

19 BIC2

74.34

124.09

436.19

728.10

703.07

1173.59

3.39

5.66

3.79

6.33

367.30

613.12

3.39

5.66

20 BIM1

5.25

8.77

115.82

193.33

452.12

754.70

NA

NA

101.85

170.01

354.33

591.46

5.25

8.77

21 BIC3

3.39

5.66

4.25

7.09

703.07

1173.59

3.39

5.66

416.85

695.82

368.28

614.74

3.39

5.66

ControllingRatingFactor

WBECM(min)

0.72

1.21

LoadRating

(HSequivalent)

14

24

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

147

Commentary:
FigureIX41presentstheinventoryratingsandoperatingratingsfortheexampleculvert
foreachlevelofanalysis.Asexpected,theLevel3analysismorecarefullydeterminesthemoment,shearandaxial
thrustdemandsandthusyieldsthehighestloadrating.NotethattheLevel1analysisusingCULV5showsthatthe
culvertwillrequireloadposting.However,theLevel2and3analysesindicatetheculvertmaynotrequireload
postingdependingonthestructuralconditionoftheculvert.PertheflowchartinFigureIII1,ifthestructural
conditionratingfortheculvertisgreaterthanorequalto5asdeterminedbasedonproceduresoutlinedinthe
TxDOTBridgeInspectionManual(TxDOT2002),theculvertwillnotneedtobeloadposted.Otherwise,theculvert
wouldneedtobepostedattheoperatingratinglevel.

30.0

loadrating(HS)

25.0

24.1

22.8

20.0
14.9

15.0

10.0

13.7

14.4

8.9

5.0

0.0
Level1:CULV5

Level2:RISA2Dw/Springs
IR

Level3:RISA2DW/LEFE

OR

FIGUREIX.41.INVENTORYRATINGANDOPERATINGRATINGFORMC1033SPAN10'X7'WITH6'FILL.

CarefulreviewofthesolutionsinAppendicesC,D,andE,alsoshowsthatforeachlevelofanalysisthecritical
sectionisdifferentinbothlocationandbendingdirection.Level1showsapositivemomentcontrollingcaseinthe
bottomexteriormidspan.Level2showsapositivemomentcontrollingcaseinthetopexteriormidspan.
However,Level3showsanegativemomentcontrollingcaseinthewallbottomexteriorcorner.Intuitionsuggests
thatthiswouldbethecase,thatis,thefiniteelementapproachyieldsamorerealisticoutcomebecauseitmodels
soilarchingeffects.Intuitionsupportsthisconclusionaswellbecausemomentredistributionoccursasthemid
spanscrackandbecomemoreflexible.Thisinturntransfersmomentloadtothecornersresultingingreater
momentsattheexteriorcorners.Thishigherordereffectcouldbeyetmoreaccuratelymodeledusingnonlinear
concretemodelsinaLevel4analysis.However,becauseloadpostingmaynotberequiredbasedontheLevel3
solution,ithasbeendeemedunnecessarytoperformaLevel4analysis.

TxDOT

CulvertRatingGuide

AppendixF.

POLICYSOURCEDOCUMENTS

149

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi