0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
35 vues2 pages
This performance by Wim Wandekeybus references Joseph Beuys' art and past performances through reenactments. It features actors, dancers, a photographer, and musician. The photographer takes pictures throughout that are projected on screen, exploring the relationship between photography, reality, fiction, and the capturing of memory and past. The performance mixes elements of theater, dance, and photography to blur reality and identity, exemplified through the shifting and uncertain identity of the central figure Brigit Walter.
This performance by Wim Wandekeybus references Joseph Beuys' art and past performances through reenactments. It features actors, dancers, a photographer, and musician. The photographer takes pictures throughout that are projected on screen, exploring the relationship between photography, reality, fiction, and the capturing of memory and past. The performance mixes elements of theater, dance, and photography to blur reality and identity, exemplified through the shifting and uncertain identity of the central figure Brigit Walter.
This performance by Wim Wandekeybus references Joseph Beuys' art and past performances through reenactments. It features actors, dancers, a photographer, and musician. The photographer takes pictures throughout that are projected on screen, exploring the relationship between photography, reality, fiction, and the capturing of memory and past. The performance mixes elements of theater, dance, and photography to blur reality and identity, exemplified through the shifting and uncertain identity of the central figure Brigit Walter.
When writing about this show I have to keep it clear in my mind that it is absolutely necessary to talk about the references. Because booty Looting!, the latest show of Wim Wandekeybus is about e"plicit references and it would be a pity not to mention them. I confess that I had probably missed some and perhaps my lecture of the show will not be complete. #nyway, I will start by saying that there are $ performers %& actors and ' dancers(, a photographer and a musician who provides live music on stage. )he storyline is simple* the reconstruction of Brigit Walter+s life, knowing that Brigit Walter is the name of the actress that is playing herself and all the performers keep their real name on stage. )he beginning is an ironical homage to ,oseph Beuys+s performance I like America and America likes me where the actor ,erry -illick plays ,oseph Beuys and the four dancers are the coyotes attacking him, while .anny Willems, the photographer, is taking as much pictures as possible e"posing himself to the risk of being attacked. )his is a first reference in order to make a very essentialised passage through performance history and ,erry aka ,oseph Beuys is pushing the moment even further by proposing an even more dangerous game, allowing the four coyotes! to tear up his clothes and eat him alive. Well, we+re in a theater, actually there is no coyote on stage and the difference between the real performance %with all the word+s real! connotations( and this fake remake is strongly related to the title. Booty Looting! means stealing what has already been stolen and in a first phase/ Wandekeybus steals ,oseph Beuys+ art that Beuys himself had stolen from the reality. 0ou steal from me, I steal from you. #rt is a bit like that!, says Wandekeybus in an interview. 1ow it+s the moment for Brigit Walter to enter the stage being presented as an anthropologist interested in ,oseph Beuys+ activity in order to give her opinion about the remake. But everything gets confusing, she drops dead and all of a sudden she comes back to life as a famous actress. 2or those who know Wandekeybus for his dance perfomances, the right thing to say is that this show has a bit of everything, as you can see from the cast/ the accent goes on the mi"ture of these elements %photography, dance, theater, music( and it+s difficult to label it. But, as Wandekeybus declared in the same interview, his ma3or concern was the photography and its impact on stage. )he connection between photography and the study that 4oland Barthes wrote about it plays an important part for a better understanding of Wandekeybus intention. It+s said that people were afraid of being photographed because they thought their souls were being stolen. 5hotography has a lot to do with death because it immortali6es something that is gone7dead and Barthes talks also about a special function of photography, confirming that something happened, something real. In this performance, there are pictures taken every minute and pro3ected immediately on a big screen, the photographer gives us pieces7photos of Brigit Walter.+s past. # past that is part true, part fiction. In this case, photography has a double power* of the past and of the present and it works in the same way as the theater does* showing something that perhaps it doesn+t e"ist but is present on stage. )he frame of the photos confronts the frame that the spectators have from their seats, so the photographer is there for giving another vision, another reality or a made-up one %see the photo session for reconstructing Brigit Walter+s relationship with her sons having some fake views behind them(. Who is Brigit Walter8 ,erry -illick is a post-dramatic story-teller, he gives fragmented details intentionally confusing the listener, the pictures could say a different story and the stage becomes a mess where everybody can be anyone7anything. Brigit Walter is an anthropologist, an actress, a bad mother, a desired woman. 9he is 4omy 9chneider playing in L'Infer of :enri Georges ;lou6ot, she becomes <edea killing her children by putting them on the photocopier and printing images of their tormented faces. )here is no Brigit Walter, there is a performance playing tricks on memory.