0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
1K vues4 pages
Phil Willis MP Chair Sci and Tech Committee UK – Could people who were adversely affected by geoengineering veto or alter geoengineering tests?
#skyderAlert
#GMACAG
#GeoEngineering
#OpChemtrails
#Chemtrails
Titre original
Phil Willis MP Chair Sci and Tech Committee UK – Could People Who Were Adversely Affected by Geoengineering Veto or Alter Geoengineering Tests
Phil Willis MP Chair Sci and Tech Committee UK – Could people who were adversely affected by geoengineering veto or alter geoengineering tests?
#skyderAlert
#GMACAG
#GeoEngineering
#OpChemtrails
#Chemtrails
Phil Willis MP Chair Sci and Tech Committee UK – Could people who were adversely affected by geoengineering veto or alter geoengineering tests?
#skyderAlert
#GMACAG
#GeoEngineering
#OpChemtrails
#Chemtrails
Phil Willis MP Chair Sci and Tech Committee UK Could people who were adversely affected
by geoengineering veto or alter geoengineering tests?
#skyderAlert #GMACAG #GeoEngineering #OpChemtrails #Chemtrails Apologies in advance. I intended to put up blog post re the following, but never did. Still I think this information important. No rhyme or reason, just posting in order I stumbled upon. Thank you, Rose Bongiovanni Cupo October 20, 2014 /// House Hearing, 111 Congress GEOENGINEERING: PARTS I, II, AND III Prepared Statement of Phil Willis PRINCIPLES FOR GEOENGINEERING REGULATIONS could people who were adversely affected by geoengineering 2. We are in favour of public consultation, but a bit cautious about public participation in . . . decision-making. For example, could people who were adversely affected by geoengineeringeven if the majority of people benefitedveto or alter geoengineering tests? http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg53007/html/CHRG-111hhrg53007.htm governance of geoengineering research should be separated from the governance of deployment http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10546t.pdf Oberle Gbor http://geckosky.tumblr.com/post/98575899368/lasd-ide-kattintva /// Downloadable pdf: http://www.scribd.com/doc/242011438/House-Hearing-111-Congress-Geoengineering-Parts-i- II-And-III /// it might be very hard to introduce a reasoned scientific argument if political momentum grows for serious limitations perhaps even an outright ban or taboo. http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/sites/default/files/file/geo_current_116/116TM_201 0_Morgan_U.S._House_of_Representatives_Geoengineering_Hearing_III_Testimony_M._Gr anger_Morgan_March_18_2010.pdf /// Regulatory framework 8. The science of geoengineering is not sufficiently advanced to make the technology predictable, but this of itself is not grounds for refusing to develop regulatory frameworks, or for banning it. There are good scientific reasons for allowing investigative research and better reasons for seeking to devise and implement some regulatory frameworks, particularly for those techniques that a single country or small group of countries could test or deploy and impact the whole climate. (Paragraph 54) 9. We conclude that there is a need to develop a regulatory framework for geoengineering. Two areas in particular need to be addressed: (i) the existing international regulatory regimes need to develop a focus on geoengineering and (ii) regulatory systems need to be designed and implemented for those SRM techniques that currently fall outside any international regulatory framework. (Paragraph 55) http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/221/221.pdf /// Science and Technology Committee Fifth Report The Regulation of Geoengineering Contents http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/221/22102.htm /// could people who were adversely affected by geoengineering veto or alter geoengineering tests Phil Willis Phil Willis MP Chair Sci and Tech Committee UK Could people who were adversely affected by geoengineering veto or alter geoengineering tests? /// 74. We conclude that Principle 2Public participation in geoengineering decisionmaking is to be supported but it needs to spell out in the explanatory text what consultation means and whether, and how, those affected can veto or alter proposed geoengineering tests. http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/sites/default/files/file/geo_current_116/116_2010_H ouse_of_Commons_Fifth_Report_Session_2009_2010_The_Regulation_of_Geoengineering _Complete_Report_March_10_2010.pdf /// IMO this is why CDC wont recognize Morgellons Disease Liability, Disability. /// http://www.cdc.gov/unexplaineddermopathy/ Morgellons: a novel dermatological perspective as the multisystem infective disease borreliosis http://f1000research.com/articles/2-118/v1 /// scribd: scribd.com/doc/242085329/Morgellons-Disease-Phantasm-Bartonella-Borrelia-Lyme- Protocol-Fibers-Keratin-Collagen Morgellons Disease phantasm bartonella borrelia lyme protocol fibers keratin collagen /// See also: http://sisterrosetta.wordpress.com/2014/01/02/morgellons-a-novel-dermatological- perspective-as-the-multisystem-infective-disease-borreliosis-peter-mayne-john-s-english- edward-j-kilbane-jennie-m-burke-marianne-j-middelveen-raphael-b-stricker/ /// #Morgellons #bartonella #borrelia #lyme #lymeDisease #keratin #collagen Morgellons Disease phantasm bartonella borrelia lyme protocol fibers keratin collagen http://sisterrosetta.wordpress.com/2014/10/06/morgellons-disease-phantasm-bartonella- borrelia-lyme-protocol-fibers-keratin-collagen/ END
Man Is On A Quest - To Play God That's Impossible - Weather Warfare - Saturday, Jul 25 Lightning Researcher Elissa Eastvedt Is Crouched Down in An Underground Bunker at The Top of The
Inhibition of Growth of So-called Morgellons Condition Ascorbic Acid Vitamin C, N-Acetyl Cysteine NAC and Glutathione a Sub-micron Cross-domain Bacteria CDB Extremely Resistant to Extinction Morgellons a Working Hypothesis Part 2
Inhibition of Growth of the So-called Morgellons Condition Ascorbic Acid Vitamin C, N-Acetyl Cysteine NAC and Glutathione a Sub-micron Cross-domain Bacteria CDB Extremely Resistant to Extinction Morgellons - A Working Hypothesis