0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
12 vues6 pages
CARPENTER INVESTMENTS, INC. Vs. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. This is a case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction under 28 u.s.c. SS1333(1). Defendant is a foreign corporation which is an authorized insurer in the State of Florida. The events giving rise to this controversy took place in Brevard County, Florida.
Description originale:
Titre original
CARPENTER INVESTMENTS, INC, v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY complaint
CARPENTER INVESTMENTS, INC. Vs. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. This is a case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction under 28 u.s.c. SS1333(1). Defendant is a foreign corporation which is an authorized insurer in the State of Florida. The events giving rise to this controversy took place in Brevard County, Florida.
CARPENTER INVESTMENTS, INC. Vs. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. This is a case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction under 28 u.s.c. SS1333(1). Defendant is a foreign corporation which is an authorized insurer in the State of Florida. The events giving rise to this controversy took place in Brevard County, Florida.
ORLANDO DIVISION CASE NO. "IN ADMIRALTY" CARPENTER INVESTMENTS, INC. Plaintiff, vs. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Defendant. / COMPLAINT IN ADMIRALTY Plaintiff CARPENTER INVESTMENTS, INC., for its Complaint against ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY states on information and belief as follows: 1. This is a case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1333(1) as hereafter more fully appears and is an admiralty or maritime claim within the meaning of Rule 9(h). 2. Plaintiff CARPENTER INVESTMENTS, INC. [herein Carpenter], is a Texas corporation. 3. Defendant ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY [herein ACE AMERICAN], is a foreign corporation which is an authorized insurer in the State of Florida and which issues policies of recreational marine insurance in the State of Florida. 4. Plaintiff CARPENTER is the documented owner of the M/V LARKSPUR, a 1973 40 foot Hinckley Bermuda sailing vessel bearing U.S. Coast Guard Official No. Case 6:14-cv-01698-JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 547409. 5. At all times pertinent hereto the Plaintiffs vessel was subject to a policy of recreational marine insurance issued by Defendant ACE AMERICAN. A copy of the applicable insurance policy is attached hereto as Exhibits 1 & 2. 6. Because the Plaintiffs vessel is a Hinckley manufacture, the insurance issued by Defendant ACE AMERICAN included a special Hinckley/Little Harbor Endorsement. See Exhibit ! 7. The events giving rise to this controversy took place in Brevard County, Florida. 8. In June 2013 Plaintiff delivered the Vessel LARKSPUR to Harbortown Marina on the Canaveral Barge Canal in Merritt Island, Florida, so that the vessel could be hauled out of the water, a bottom job performed on the vessel by Harbortown Marina, with the vessel then secured in dry storage by Harbortown Marina throughout the ensuing hurricane season. 9. Upon completion of the first phase of the vessels bottom job involving the removal of old excess bottom paint, Harbortown Marina proceeded to block the vessel in their dry storage yard and purportedly secure it for the extended hurricane season. 10. In October 2013 Plaintiff made arrangements for the second phase and completion of the bottom job by a Harbortown Marina authorized contractor. 11. When Plaintiff arrived at the vessel on October 21, 2013, to check on the progress of the bottom job (i.e., application of new bottom paint), Plaintiff discovered -2- Case 6:14-cv-01698-JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 2 of 6 PageID 2 that the bottom job was not being properly done and that the vessel had not been properly blocked by Harbortown Marina in its dry storage yard, as a result of which large amounts of rain water had accumulated in the vessel since June 2013 with resulting damage to the vessel and her equipment and contents. 12. Plaintiff promptly reported the loss and damages to Plaintiffs vessel to both Harbortown Marina and to Defendant ACE AMERICAN. 13. Defendant ACE AMERICAN sent a representative to the vessel to investigate the loss. That representative then reported in writing on November 12, 2013, to both Plaintiff and to Harbortown Marina that evidence gathered shows that Harbortown blocked the vessel incorrectly, as well as never made any follow up inspections. The blocking attitude resulted in the vessel taking on and accumulating large amounts of rain water in the bilge spaces over time. Eventually the bilge spaces overflowed and submerged the cabin soles. Additionally, the accumulated water caused damage to the interior soft goods (upholstered bedding), cabinetry, cabin soles, machinery, and electrical components. Defendants November 12, 2013, Notice of Intent further advised Harbortown Marina to inform its insurance carriers of a probable subrogation action to recover the losses that ACE AMERICAN would pay out to Plaintiff under its policy and as its insured. 14. Because the vessel had sustained a covered loss and the policy carried a Hinckley/Little Harbor Endorsement the vessel was ultimately transported to a suitable Hinckley repair facility for further analysis of the loss and resulting repairs. 15. On December 21, 2013, Plaintiff presented to Defendant ACE -3- Case 6:14-cv-01698-JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 3 of 6 PageID 3 AMERICAN a copy of a detailed claim directed to Harbortown Marina (as suggested by ACE AMERICAN) which included an itemization of expenses paid out due to the loss plus an itemization of estimated expenses to be incurred, including a detailed estimate from The Hinckley Company of Stuart, Florida, which detailed repairs to be made as a result of the damages to the vessel. 16. Harbortown Marina disclaimed any responsibility for the loss. 17. Plaintiffs formal claim to Defendant ACE AMERICAN under Plaintiffs own insurance policy was submitted on March 12, 2014, with additional supporting documentation as requested by Defendant, for a total claim as of March 12, 2014, of $85,593.42, after application of a $4,500.00 policy deductible, certain depreciation applicable to the damaged interior soft goods, and a credit for certain bottom paint. 18. On May 29, 2014, Defendant ACE AMERICAN made a payment to Plaintiff of $33,088.26 on the claim and loss but declined to make any further payment absent additional documentation and conversion of certain estimates to actual costs. 19. Consequently, the vessel was again delivered to the Hinckley Company which revisited its earlier estimate and converted it to fixed prices as requested by Defendant. A revised claim was then submitted to Defendant ACE AMERICAN establishing that a further payment remained due under the policy of $79,663.22. 20. On September 29, 2014, Defendant ACE AMERICAN issued a letter to Plaintiff advising that it would pay an additional sum of $5,950.00 on Plaintiffs claim in conclusion of the claim but would make no further payments. 21. As a result of the foregoing, there remains due and owing to Plaintiff -4- Case 6:14-cv-01698-JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4 CARPENTER the further sum under the Defendants insurance policy of at least $79,633.22 together with interest thereon, which Plaintiff CARPENTER is entitled to recover from Defendant ACE AMERICAN. 22. Because of the foregoing, Plaintiff CARPENTER has been forced to incur the services of the maritime law firm of Patricia K. Olney, P.A., in order to enforce its rights and protect its interest under the policy of insurance issued to it for the M/V LARKSPUR and Plaintiff is obligated to pay her reasonable attorneys fees plus costs and expenses for her services on its behalf. 23. Plaintiff is entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses against Defendant ACE AMERICAN pursuant to Florida Statute 627.428 and as a named insured of Defendant who has been compelled to bring suit under its policy. 24. All conditions precedent to this action have occurred or been waived. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff CARPENTER INVESTMENTS, INC., demands judgment against Defendant ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY in the sum of at least $79,663.22 with interest thereon, together with Plaintiffs reasonable attorneys fees, expenses and costs as well as such other relief to which the Plaintiff may be entitled under the circumstances presented and as the justice of the cause may require. Dated the 19th day of October, 2014. s/ Patricia K. Olney PATRICIA K. OLNEY Florida Bar No. 0269166 Patricia K. Olney, P.A. 275 Magnolia Ave., Suite 7 -5- Case 6:14-cv-01698-JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 5 of 6 PageID 5 Merritt Island, FL 32952 (321) 799-2575 (321) 799-1733 (Facsimile) olney@vessellaw.com -6- Case 6:14-cv-01698-JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 6 of 6 PageID 6
The Complete Guide to Alternative Home Building Materials & Methods: Including Sod, Compressed Earth, Plaster, Straw, Beer Cans, Bottles, Cordwood, and Many Other Low Cost Materials