cost \ton $ cost \ton $ cost \ton $ cost \ton $

75 70 40 55
clinker fly ash lime stone gypsum
ton\hours 32 % 67% 20% 10% 3%
ton\day 768 ton\hours 21.44 6.4 3.2 0.96
ton\hours\$ 1608 448 128 52.8
ton\hours 35 % 67% 25% 5% 3%
ton\day 840 ton\hours 23.45 8.75 1.75 1.05
ton\hours\$ 1758.75 612.5 70 57.75
ton\hours 40 % 67% 30% 0% 3%
ton\day 960 ton\hours 26.8 12 0 1.2
ton\hours\$ 2010 840 0 66
Estimated figures for the costs of raw materials I used I do not know .
I have worked on three alternatives .
1 Head of the Alternative 10% limestone , fly ash, 20% have used .
2 Head of the Alternative 5% limestone , fly ash, and 25% have used .
3 Head of the Alternative 0 % limestone , fly ash, 30% have used .
Clearly we need to use as fly ash, limestone instead .
Fly ash may be more expensive but more advantageous from a business perspective chalk .
WHY FLY ASH
Not too moisture ash flys.
For this reason, drying is not required.
We do not have too much burning hot air furnace.
Thus, our use of diesel will drop significantly.
Fly ash thin material.
You do not need too much grinding at the mill.
System does not overexert. Systems running comfortable.
System quickly abandoned the cement is mixed.
If you use 30% fly ash, 32.5 Production at the mill tonnage of 40 tons \ hours a will.
WHY NOT LIMESTONE
Limestone has also moisture.
Needs to be drying.
We need to burning hot air furnace.
Our use of the Buddha because a considerable amount of fuel is high.
Because it is thicker material in the mill remains much more.
More needs to be grinding.
System tiring. Mills and causes blockages in the filters from time to time.
Limestone mill tonnage increases the utilization rate is falling.
AS A RESULT INSTEAD OF FLY ASH USING MY IDEA MILLLMESTONE LOOKS MORE ECONOMIC US.
IF YOU USE ONLY FLY ASH MILL WE TONNAGES 32.5 DAILY PRODUCTION WILL BE TONS 900-950.
NOTE: As of right now the factory has 44,000 tons of limestone.
When we use only fly ash, we need to find solutions for our limestone.
Alternative mixed
cement sale ton $
135
Estimated figures for the costs of raw materials I used I do not know .
2 Head of the Alternative 5% limestone , fly ash, and 25% have used .
Fly ash may be more expensive but more advantageous from a business perspective chalk .
If you use 30% fly ash, 32.5 Production at the mill tonnage of 40 tons \ hours a will.
Our use of the Buddha because a considerable amount of fuel is high.
System tiring. Mills and causes blockages in the filters from time to time.
AS A RESULT INSTEAD OF FLY ASH USING MY IDEA MILLLMESTONE LOOKS MORE ECONOMIC US.
IF YOU USE ONLY FLY ASH MILL WE TONNAGES 32.5 DAILY PRODUCTION WILL BE TONS 900-950.
NOTE: As of right now the factory has 44,000 tons of limestone.
When we use only fly ash, we need to find solutions for our limestone.
72.90 2916 5400 129,600 3,888,000
40,824,000 21,591,360
25,194,240 46,656,000
71.40 2499 4725 113,400 3,402,000
sale \years $ cast\years $
69.90 2237 4320 103,680 3,110,400 37,324,800 19,325,952
sale \month $
Alternative mixed
cost \
ton $
cost\
hours $
sale \
hours $ sale \day $
19,232,640
21,461,760
profit\years $
17,998,848