71%(14)71% ont trouvé ce document utile (14 votes)
12K vues9 pages
The Compliance Monitoring Report summarizes the status of D. Loria International Corporation's compliance with its Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) conditions from January to June 2022. Key findings include:
- The plant operated at its optimum efficiency level of 80% and there were no reported exceedances that would contribute to environmental pollution.
- Monitoring showed compliance with provisions of relevant environmental laws and the company's approved Environmental Management Plan.
- Regular environmental sampling analyses were conducted and the results will be submitted in the next report.
- The company created an environmental unit led by a qualified Environmental Officer to ensure compliance with DENR standards.
Description originale:
PROPONENT-Compliance Monitoring Report - New Format-Sample
The Compliance Monitoring Report summarizes the status of D. Loria International Corporation's compliance with its Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) conditions from January to June 2022. Key findings include:
- The plant operated at its optimum efficiency level of 80% and there were no reported exceedances that would contribute to environmental pollution.
- Monitoring showed compliance with provisions of relevant environmental laws and the company's approved Environmental Management Plan.
- Regular environmental sampling analyses were conducted and the results will be submitted in the next report.
- The company created an environmental unit led by a qualified Environmental Officer to ensure compliance with DENR standards.
The Compliance Monitoring Report summarizes the status of D. Loria International Corporation's compliance with its Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) conditions from January to June 2022. Key findings include:
- The plant operated at its optimum efficiency level of 80% and there were no reported exceedances that would contribute to environmental pollution.
- Monitoring showed compliance with provisions of relevant environmental laws and the company's approved Environmental Management Plan.
- Regular environmental sampling analyses were conducted and the results will be submitted in the next report.
- The company created an environmental unit led by a qualified Environmental Officer to ensure compliance with DENR standards.
PROPONENTS NAME MONITORING PERIOD COVERED: January to June 2! I. "ASIC PROJECT IN#ORMATION AND $PDATES ECC Control No/Reference Code No.: ECC%R&A%!'%'%()) *ate* January '+ 2! Project Title: ",o%Et-ano. P.ant Project Type: D,/t,..at,on an* #er0entat,on Location: S,t,o Ma,/an+ "aran1ay Tu2u-an+ Na/u12u+ "atan1a/ Project Coordinates: '& O '2!3 to '& O '(4.!3 Nort- .at,tu*e an* '2 O 5'&.)3 to '2 O 5'5'.)3 Ea/t .on1,tu*e Project Stage/Phase: (i.e. construction; commissioning, etc.) O6erat,on P-a/e Contact Person: M/. D,1na Lor,a Contact Numers: (&() 57)%7)7) E!P "ppro#al: $ 8 % &uring ECC "pplication Stage $ 8 % 'pdated after ECC (ssuance) appro#ed on May (+ 2! Changes in Project &esign *if any+: In9rea/e ,n 6ro*u9t,on 9a6a9,ty an* In/ta..at,on o: A**,t,ona. Ma9-,ner,e/ an* E;u,60ent II. E<EC$TIVE S$MMAR= This section should include a summary of the major findings for the monitoring period. ,or e-ample. a statement that there /ere no major acti#ities that influenced the monitoring parameters during the monitoring period can e made if there /ere really no acti#ities y the proponent that affected the monitored parameters. Ta2.e II%'. Su00ary o: Ma>or #,n*,n1/ :or t-e Mon,tor,n1 Per,o* Con*,t,on?Re;u,re0ent? Co00,t0ent Co06.,an9e Statu/ @ Su00ary o: A9t,on/ TaAen Re9o00en*at,on?Co00,t0ent :or t-e NeBt Re6ort,n1 Compliance /ith ECC Co06.,e* Cont,nuou/ 0on,tor,n1 on 9o06.,an9e to ECC 9on*,t,on/ Compliance /ith E!P A,r Po..ut,on: Du/t 9o..e9tor Ca/ ,n/ta..e* an* 0a,nta,ne* Dater Po..ut,on: Da/teCater Treat0ent #a9,.,ty Ca/ ,n/ta..e* an* 0a,nta,ne* So.,* Da/te: ProE,/,on o: 1ar2a1e 2,n/ ,n /trate1,9 .o9at,on/ o: t-e 6.ant. I06.e0entat,on o: 6ro6er Se1re1at,on+ Re9y9.,n1+ Reu/e an* D,/6o/a.. Co00,//,one* a99re*,te* -au.er/ FaGar*ou/ Da/te: a.. toB,9 an* -aGar*ou/ Ca/te/ are 6ro6er.y /tore* ,n t-e *e/,1nate* 9-e0,9a. Ca/te roo0 6r,or to *,/6o/a. 2y an a99re*,te* treater Cont,nuou/ 0on,tor,n1 an* 9o06.,an9e to t-e 6roE,/,on/ o: RA !4&)+ RA )245+ RA )( an* RA 7)7) an* t-e,r re/6e9t,Ee IRR (mplementation of appropriate and effecti#e en#ironmental impact remedial actions in case of e-ceedances T-e 6.ant ,/ o6erat,n1 at ,t/ o6t,0u0 e::,9,en9y .eEe. o: !H an* no re9or*/ o: eB9ee*an9e/ t-at C,.. 9ontr,2ute to enE,ron0enta. 6o..ut,on. T-e Cont,n1en9y P.an an* E0er1en9y Re/6on/e Pro1ra0 /-a.. 2e /tr,9t.y ,06.e0ente* ,n Cont,nuou/ 0on,tor,n1 an* 9o06.,an9e to t-e 6roE,/,on/ o: RA !4&)+ RA )245+ RA )( an* RA 7)7) an* t-e,r re/6e9t,Ee IRR 9a/e o: eB9ee*an9e/ to DENR /tan*ar*/ Complaints management T-e 9o06any ,/ an a9t,Ee 0e02er o: an enE,ron0enta.,/t 1rou6 C-ere 9o06.a,nt/ are 2e,n1 re/o.Ee*. No 9o06.a,nt/ Cere re9e,Ee* 2y t-e 9o06any :ro0 /taAe-o.*er/ /,n9e t-e 9o06any ,/ a .aC%a2,*,n1 9,t,Gen In 9a/e o: any 9o06.a,nt/ re9e,Ee*+ t-e 9o06any /-a.. /u20,t t-e re/u.t/ o: t-e /ett.e0ent or re/o.ut,on un*ertaAen 2y t-e 9o06any Realistic and sufficient udget for conducting the en#ironmental monitoring and audit acti#ities T-e 9o06any a..o9ate* P5+. :or t-e 6er,o*,9 /a06.,n1 ana.y/e/ an* *e/,1nate* t-e EnE,ron0enta. O::,9er?PCO to -an*.e 9o06.,an9e to DENR Stan*ar*/ Co/t /u00ary o: 2u*1etary re;u,re0ent/ an* 6ro1re// re6ort /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* "ccountaility 0 1ualified personnel are charged /ith the routine monitoring of the project acti#ities in terms of education. training. 2no/ledge and e-perience of the en#ironmental team T-e 9o06any 9reate* an enE,ron0enta. un,t an* *e/,1nate* M/. C-ery. Duya a/ ,t/ EnE,ron0enta. O::,9er?PCO to .ea* an* -an*.e 9o06.,an9e to DENR Stan*ar*/ T-e EnE,ron0enta. O::,9er?PCO /-a.. 9oor*,nate C,t- t-e EM" re1ar*,n1 u6*ate/ on 9o06.,an9e to DENR Stan*ar*/ 3thers44 N/" III. RES$LTS AND DISC$SSIONS A. Co06.,an9e Mon,tor,n1 The status of compliance to the ECC conditionalities and the attainment of E!P commitments should e elaorated in this section. Reasons for noncompliance or unmet commitment should e e-plained and solutions and measures to attain full compliance of ECC terms and conditions as /ell as satisfactory attainment of E!P commitments should e discussed as rene/ed efforts for the ne-t monitoring period. Ta2.e ' may e used to summari5e the status of compliance. Ta2.e '. Su00ary Statu/ o: ECC @ EMP Co06.,an9e ECC?EMP Con*,t,on?Re;u,re0ent Cate1or,Gat,on Re.eEant ECC Con*,t,on/ Statu/ o: Co06.,an9e (8 ,: 9o06.y,n1) Re0arA/ I Re;u,re0ent? De/9r,6t,on 6 Project Co#erage/ Limits T-e 0aB,0u0 annua. 9a6a9,ty ,/ 5+ 0etr,9 ton/ 8 #ro0 January to May 2!+ t-e 6.ant -a/ a.rea*y 6ro*u9e* a2out 2+ 0etr,9 ton/. In9rea/e ,n 9a6a9,ty Ca/ a66roEe* on January '+ 2! 7 Components D,/t,..at,on De6art0ent+ #er0entat,on De6art0ent+ "o,.,n1 Fou/e De6art0ent+ PoCer P.ant+ DT#+ Du/t Co..e9tor Sy/te0+ Stora1e Area :or raC 0ater,a./ an* :,n,/-e* 6ro*u9t/ 8 D,t- ,n/ta..at,on o: a**,t,ona. 0a9-,nery an* e;u,60ent 8 3ther sectoral re1uirements mandated y other agencies to e complied /ith 7 Per0,t/?C.earan9e/ Cere /e9ure* :ro0 FL$R"+ NDR"+ LG$/+ DOE+ DOLE+ DTI+ DOF+ et9. 8 Co6,e/ o: 6er0,t/? 9.earan9e/ /-a.. 2e ,n9.u*e* ,n t-e neBt /u20,//,on o: CMR or /ee AnneB JJJ or Atta9-0ent JJJJ 9 E!P and updates as deemed re1uired 6. 7. 8. 9. :. ;. < Str,9t ,06.e0entat,on o: t-e a66roEe* EMP 8 T-e u6*ate* EMP /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u20,//,on o: CMR or /ee AnneB JJJ or Atta9-0ent JJJJ : Conduct of aseline. compliance and impact self= monitoring ;. > A,r an* Dater Kua.,ty /a06.,n1 ana.y/e/ Cere 9on*u9te* 8 Re/u.t/ o: .a2oratory /a06.,n1 ana.y/e/ /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u20,//,on o: CMR or /ee AnneB JJJ or Atta9-0ent JJJJ ; !ulti=sectoral monitoring *as may e re1uired+ 6> MOA :or t-e 9reat,on o: MMT Ca/ a66roEe* on A6r,. (+ 2! 8 Co6y o: t-e MOA /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u20,//,on o: CMR or /ee AnneB JJJ or Atta9-0ent JJJJ > Regular reporting < Re1u.ar /u20,//,on o: t-e /e0,%annua. CMR an* ;uarter.y SMR 8 Co6y o: t-e CMR an* SMR /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u20,//,on o: CMR or /ee AnneB JJJ or Atta9-0ent JJJJ < (nstitutional arrangements necessary for implementation of en#ironmental management measures 6. 9. : Coor*,nat,on C,t- LG$+ 1oEern0ent a1en9,e/ 9on9erne* on t-e ,06.e0entat,on o: EMP ISO '& 9ert,:,e* 8 D,t- MOA Re1u.ar au*,t 2y au*,tor/ ? Standard &ENR re1uirements on transfer of o/nership 8 No tran/:er o: oCner/-,6 8 T-e 9o06any /-a.. ,n:or0 EM" on t-,/ 0atter 6@ Standard &ENR re1uirements on aandonment < No a2an*on0ent or tran/:er o: .o9at,on 8 T-e 9o06any /-a.. ,n:or0 EM" on t-,/ 0atter 66 (mpact !itigation Plan or Construction/ ContractorAs En#ironmental Program 6. 7. 8. 9. :. ;. < E!P Str,9t ,06.e0entat,on o: t-e a66roEe* IMP 8 T-e u6*ate* IMP /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u20,//,on o: CMR or /ee AnneB JJJ or Atta9-0ent JJJJ 67 Social &e#elopment Plan 9 E!P Se9ure* e06.oy0ent+ tra,n,n1/?/e0,nar/ :or e06.oyee/+ /9-o.ar/-,6+ /a.ary .oan/+ 0e*,9a. 9on/u.tat,on :or e06.oyee/ an* 2ene:,9,ar,e/ 8 Co6y o: t-e SDP /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u20,//,on o: CMR or /ee AnneB JJJ or Atta9-0ent JJJJ 68 (EC Plan 8 E!P Re1u.ar 9on/u.tat,on C,t- t-e e06.oyee/ an* -o/t 9o00un,ty a2out t-e /a:e o6erat,on o: t-e 9o06any 8 Co6y o: t-e IEC P.an /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u20,//,on o: CMR or /ee AnneB JJJ or Atta9-0ent JJJJ 69 Contingency/ Emergency Response Plan or e1ui#alent Ris2 !anagement Plan 7 T-e 9o06any -a/ a Cont,n1en9y? E0er1en9y Re/6on/e P.an C-,9- Ca/ ,n9or6orate* ,n t-e ECC a66.,9at,on *o9u0ent/ 8 Co6y o: t-e Cont,n1en9y? E0er1en9y Re/6on/e P.an /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u20,//,on o: CMR or /ee AnneB JJJ or Atta9-0ent JJJJ 6: "andonment Plan */hen applicale+ < At 6re/ent+ no :ore9a/t o: a2an*on,n1 t-e 6ro>e9t 8 T-e A2an*on0ent P.an /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* 2 0ont-/ 6r,or to a2an*on0ent a9t,E,t,e/. 6; En#ironmental !onitoring Plan *E!oP+ E!oP In9or6orate* ,n t-e ECC a66.,9at,on *o9u0ent/ 8 T-e u6*ate* EMoP /-a.. 2e /u20,tte* ,n t-e neBt /u20,//,on o: CMR or /ee AnneB JJJ or Atta9-0ent JJJJ 6> 3thers4444 N/" ". I06a9t Mon,tor,n1 This section shall contain rele#ant graphical presentation of 1uantitati#e and semi=1uantitati#e impact monitoring results sho/ing trends. comparing past monitoring results /ith the current. Rele#ant monitoring results in the other S!R modules shall e referred to. The latest monitoring findings and conclusion should e discussed in te-t form. Bualitati#e impact monitoring results may e presented in te-t form or in terms of pictorial co#erage. if applicale. E-amples of 1ualitati#e impacts are those relating to 1uality of life. degree of happiness. and sense of en#ironmental cleanliness. Pro>e9t A9t,E,t,e/ Pre*,9te* I06a9t: De/9r,6t,on 6er Para0eter M,t,1at,on? En-an9e0ent A9tua.?Re/,*ua. I06a9t Pro6o/e* C-an1e/ to t-e M,t,1at,on? En-an9e0ent P.an Pre-Construction Construction Operation Abandonment i. Summary of Previous Monitoring The 2ey findings. recommendations. and action plan from the pre#ious monitoring and outstanding issues from earlier monitoring periods *if applicale+ should e highlighted in this section. *Provide discussion and results of laboratory sampling analyses ii. Current Monitoring Results and Findings The data collected and related e-penses from the #arious sampling and measurement e#ents done under the En#ironmental !onitoring Plan *E!oP+ or a Sampling and !easurement Plan *S"!P+ for the current monitoring period shall e summari5ed in a taular form. preferaly using the prescried format in Ta2.e/ 2 an* ( elo/. and discussed under this section. 3nly processed and summari5ed data must e presented here. The current monitoring results must e related to the historical trend for each parameter. "ny de#iation from this trend must e e-plained. !ore. importantly. the discussion must focus on point=y=point comparison of the gathered #alues /ith En#ironmental Buality Performance Le#els *EBPLs+. if EBPLs ha#e een committed y the Proponent or estalished /ith the !ulti=partite !onitoring Team. The monitoring results could also e used to determine the action and limit le#els for the specific project. These should all e presented here in detail and summari5ed in the conclusions and recommendations section. Compliances. non=compliances and e-ceedances must all e thoroughly e-plained. (n cases of compliances. success factors must e cited. ,or non=compliances and e-ceedances. the proponentAs response should e e-plained. !oreo#er. causati#e factors must e identified and additional solutions and mitigation measures proposed. if needed. (t should also cite the /eather conditions and other factors /hich may affect the results of the sampling acti#ities. The status of compliance to recommendations from pre#ious monitoring and measures included in the action plan should e descried and any unmet commitment must e rationali5ed and alternati#e. if needed. presented. Ta2.e 2. Su00ary Statu/ o: EnE,ron0enta. I06a9t Mana1e0ent an* Mon,tor,n1 P.an I06.e0entat,on !onitoring 3jecti#e En#ironmental "spect En#ironmental (mpact !onitoring Parameter Sampling C !easurement Standard/ E(S Prediction En#tAl !gt. !easures Remar2s *EBPL commitme nt. if any+ Results Stn/ Loc Pre#ious Current Compliance to R" <>9? *"ir Buality+ "ir emission from genset. oiler *e1uipment that use fuel+ "ir pollution. Noise pollution. health ha5ards TSP. S3-. N3-. C3-. P!6@. P. 38. D7S. E3C (dentifi ed station s FPro#ide results of sampling analyses FPro#ide results of sampling analyses Complian ce to &ENR Emission Standards Pro#ision and maintenan ce of CE!S. stac2s. uffer 5one. tree planting FNo EBPL/Not applicale FSet limits/ /arning Compliance to R" ?7>: *Gater Buality+ &ischarge of /aste/ater and effluent Gater pollution. land contamination. health ha5ards H3&. C3&. pD. TSS. Temp.. T&S. coliform. E.Coli. 3il C Irease. metals (dentifi ed station s. outfall FPro#ide results of sampling analyses FPro#ide results of sampling analyses Complian ce to &ENR Effluent C Gaste/at er Standards Pro#ision C maintenan ce of GTP FNo EBPL/Not applicale FSet limits/ /arning Compliance to R" ;?;? *Da5/aste !gt.+ Ieneration of to-ic and ha5ardous /astes Gater pollution. land contamination. health ha5ards FTCLP Fmetals FThose classified in Tale 6=6 of (RR. PCL Storag e area FPro#ide results of sampling analyses FPro#ide results of sampling analyses Complian ce to R" ;?;? Standards Pro#ision C maintenan ce of storage area FNo EBPL/Not applicale FSet limits/ /arning Compliance to R" ?@@8 Ieneration of solid /aste Gater pollution. land contamination. health ha5ards Eolume of solid /astes generated Githin the site. !R, FPro#ide #olume generated FPro#ide #olume generated Complian ce to R" ?@@8 (RR Pro#ision C maintenan ce of ins. !R, FNo EBPL/Not applicale FSet limits/ /arning LEKPL%EnE,ron0enta. Kua.,ty Per:or0an9e LeEe. o "lert or Red ,lag = early /arning o "ction Le#el=point /here management measures must e employed so as not to reach the regulated threshold or limit le#el. or to reduce deterioration of affected en#ironmental component to pre=impact or optimum en#ironmental 1uality o Limit Le#el=regulated threshold of pollutant *standard that must not e e-ceeded+) point /here emergency response measures must e employed to reduce pollutants to lo/er than standard limit. o NOTE: Section on EBPLs may e filled out as a ProponentAs draft commitment or after these ha#e een estalished and mutually agreed upon among Proponent. E!H and other !!T memers. 3ther/ise. only the L(!(T Le#el shall e the reference for regulatory compliance. This means that en#ironmental management measures are formulated at the J"CT(3N le#elK so as not to e-ceed this regulated threshold. Ta2.e (. Re6ort on Statu/ o: EnE,ron0enta. "u*1et A..o9at,on/ an* EB6en/e/ EB6en/e Ite0L "u*1et A9tua. EB6en/e/ D,re9t :ro0 Co06any "u*1et :or MMT D,re9t Co06any EB6en/e MMT EB6en/e/ A. I06.e0entat,on o: Mana1e0ent P.an/ @ Pro1ra0/ 6+ En#ironmental (mpact !itigation Plan P8@@.@@@ FPro#ide the P8@@.@@@ appro#ed G,P 7+ Social &e#elopment Plan P:@.@@@ FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P P:@.@@@ 8+ (EC Plan P:.@@@ FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P P:.@@@ 9+ Enhancement Programs *if any+ N/" FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P N/" ". ,06.e0entat,on o: Mon,tor,n1 P.an/ 6+ Self=!onitoring P6@@.@@@ FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P P6@@.@@@ 7+ En#ironmental !onitoring ,und */ith !!T+ FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P 8+ En#ironmental Iuarantee ,und FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P FPro#ide the appro#ed G,P T3T"LS P9::.@@@ P9::.@@@ F,or mining projects. e1ui#alent cost items shall e adopted. e.g. S&!P in lieu of S&P. IV. CONCL$SIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This section should present the conclusions and recommendations of the current S!R ased on the results and discussion of the pre#ious sections. (t should also e-plain if the pre#ious monitoring recommendations should continue *if implemented+. 3n the other hand. if /arranted. the recommendation may e the cessation of specific or all monitoring acti#ities. The conclusions and recommendations should preferaly e in a ulleted format and as much as possile grouped according to coherent themes. such as the follo/ing headings. A. Co06.,an9e Statu/ 3nly the 2ey conclusions aout the status of compliance to ECC and E!P are included in this section. The status of non=compliances should e particularly trac2ed throughout all S!Rs e#en if compliance has een already attained. Recommended additional measures or amendments to the E!P should e presented here. *ased on t!e presented environmental data and results of actual monitoring activities" t!e company is compliant to t!e conditions stipulated in t!e #CC *ased on t!e actual monitoring activities" t!e company complied to $#%R Standards e&cept e&ceedance to ''''''''''''''''(parameter)due to '''''''''''''''''. ". EnE,ron0enta. Kua.,ty Statu/ (a66.,9a2.e on.y ,: EKPL/ -aEe 2een /et 2y t-e Pro6onent a/ ,t/ 9o00,t0ent or ,: o6te* to 2e 0utua..y a1ree* u6on 2y Pro6onent C,t- t-e EM" an* ot-er 0e02er/ o: t-e MMT) 3nly the 2ey conclusions on meeting the set EBPLs are included in this section. *ased on t!e actual monitoring activities" results of sampling analysis for air and *ater +uality are *it!in t!e limit set fort! in t!e $#%R Standards. *ased on t!e actual monitoring activities" t!e company complied to $#%R Standards e&cept e&ceedance to ''''''''''''''''(parameter)due to '''''''''''''''''. C. EnE,ron0enta. Mana1e0ent P.an Statu/ 3nly the 2ey conclusions aout the status of E!P implementation and recommended additional measures or amendments should e presented here. LProE,*e 0atr,B o: t-e a66roEe* EMP?IMP?EMS%2a/e* EMP D. ENVIRONMENTAL RISM CATEGORINATION The proponent should fill=up or update the projectAs en#ironmental ris2 categori5ation 1uestionnaire *presented in "nne- 7=>d of the Re#ised Procedural !anual of &"3 7@@8=8@+ 0 applicale on the Second Semi=annual ECC Compliance !onitoring Report. PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND A$DIT PRIORITINATION SCFEME (PEMAPS) K$ESTIONNAIRE Pro>e9t Na0e : ",o%Et-ano. P.ant Pro>e9t Lo9at,on : S,t,o Ma,/an+ "aran1ay Tu2u-an+ Na/u12u+ "atan1a/ ECC Re:eren9e No/. : ECC%R&A%!'%'%()) *ate* January '+ 2! Pro6onent O D. Lor,a Internat,ona. Cor6orat,on Po..ut,on Contro. O::,9er : En1r. C-ery. Duya Te.. No. : (&() 57)%7)7) #aB No. : (&() 57)%7)7) E%0a,. : *.or,aPya-oo.9o0 Pro>e9t Ty6e : J % #oo* an* Re.ate* In*u/tr,e/ J( Q D,/t,..at,on @ #er0entat,on Pro>e9t Statu/ : O6erat,on I. PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS 6.6 Si5e and Type 6.6.6 Si5e ased on numer of employees Numer of Employees 0 ;:@ 6.6.6 Type Non=ECP and Non=EC" 6.7 Gaste Ieneration and !anagement 6.7.6 Gaste Type and Buantity of Gastes Ienerated Cate1ory Da/te Da/te Ty6e Kuant,ty "ir Particulate !atter Non=Da5ardous !T/year Gater Process Gaste/ater Non=Da5ardous Cuic meter/year Solid !ud ca2e ,ly ash Hagasse Non=Da5ardous Non=Da5ardous Non=Da5ardous !T/year !T/year !T/year 6.8 Pollution Control System *PCS+ 6.8.6 PCS or Gaste !anagement !ethod 'sed Cate1ory PCS?Da/te Mana1e0ent Met-o* $/e* Re0arA/ "ir Get Scruer for Hoiler Emissions Complemented y settling asin for solid /aste collection Gater Primary Treatment 0 Settling Hasins Secondary Treatment 0 Hiological Tertiary Treatment = Hiological Gater recycling practiced. hence discharge is minimal Solid Composting ,acility /!R, Coordination /ith LI'. haulers II. PATFDA=S 7.6 Pre#ailing /ind to/ards arrioL No 7.7 Rainfall *impacts surface and ground/ater path/ays+ 7.7.6 "#erage annual net rainfall = 7.:@@ mm 7.7.7 !a-imum 79=hr rainfall = 67@ mm 7.8 TerrainL ,lat 7.9 (s the facility located in a flood prone areaL No 7.: Iround/ater &epth of ground/ater *m+ Ireater than 6@ III. RECEIVING MEDIA?RECEPTORS 8.6 "ir *&istance to nearest community+ @.: to 6 2m 8.7 Recei#ing surface /ater ody 8.7.6 &istance to recei#ing surface /ater @.: to 6 2m 8.7.7 Si5e of population using recei#ing 7@ DD surface /ater 8.7.8 ,resh /ater 8.7.8.6 Classification of fresh /ater Class C 8.7.8.7 Si5e of fresh /ater ody 6:< s1. 2m. drainage area 8.7.8.8 Economic #alue of /ater use (ndustrial "gricultural 8.7.9 Salt /ater *Estuarine /ater 0 : 2m tidally affected ri#er segment+ 8.7.9.6 Classification of salt /ater Class S& 8.7.9.7 Economic #alue of /ater use (ndustrial 8.8 Iround/ater 8.8.6 &istance to nearest recharge area Ireater than 6 2m 8.8.7 &istance to nearest /ell used Ireater than 6 2m 8.8.8 Iround/ater use for nearest /ell (ndustrial 8.9 Land 8.9.6 (ndicate current/actual land uses /ithin @.: 2m radius (ndustrial "gricultural Residential 8.9.7 Potential/proposed land uses /ithin @.: 2m radius (ndustrial 8.9.8 Numer of affected En#ironmentally Critical "rea /ithin 6 2m RadiusL None 8.9.9 &istance to nearest EC" Ireater than 6 2m 8.: Compliance *to e chec2ed /ith E("& and PC& files+ Compliant 8.; Numer of #alid complaints 8.;.6 Citi5en and NI3 None 8.;.7 3thers None IV ENVIRONMENTAL PER#ORMANCE (#OR E<ISTING PROJECTS #OR E<PANSION) LaC V,o.at,on E0,//,on?E::.uent? D,/9-ar1e A02,ent Fu0an I06a9t A*0,n/ ECC Ty6e o: A*0,n V,o.at,on Re0arA/? Statu/ o: Co06.,an9e R" <>9? FNone R" ?7>: FNone R" ;?;? FNone R" 6:<; FNone FMes FE-pansion /ithout ECC R" 7@@8 FNone *To be filled up by EMB personnel) RECOMMENDATIONS: JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ "ssessed Hy: NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Noted Hy: NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN E. DORM PLAN #OR NE<T MONITORING PERIOD The specific actions for the ne-t monitoring period. including carry=o#ers from pre#ious monitoring periods. should e detailed in this section. % A/ re;u,re* 2y 9on*,t,on/ /t,6u.ate* ,n t-e ECC % V. ATTACFMENTS Please ha#e the follo/ing documents attached: a+ Laoratory Results of "nalysis from &ENR=E!H recogni5ed laoratory) + "ppro#ed (mpact !itigation Plan in the E(S/other E(S 'pdate &ocuments) and c+ "ppro#ed En#ironmental !onitoring Plan in the E(S/other E(S 'pdate &ocuments d+ Related data PREPARED "=: NOTED "=: CFER=L D$=A . DIGNA LORIA . Po..ut,on Contro. O::,9er Genera. Mana1er D. Lor,a Internat,ona. Cor6orat,on D. Lor,a Internat,ona. Cor6orat,on JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ Date Date %ame $esignation Company $ate