On Freedom of Expression to contract under commercial premise, under the Supremacy of Parliament

1. PREAMBLE: The case law on the freeman movement originated in 12th-century Europe and was
common as an English or American Colonial expression in Puritan times. n Colonial times! a man had to
"e elected to this privilege "y the #eneral Court. $eing a freeman carried with it the right to vote. $y the
mid 1%
th
century! you needed to ta&e an oath to "e recogni'ed freeman. (ith the a"olition of slavery the
term "ecame irrelevant $)T the law society! the free mason societies! and guilds continued the practice of
ta&ing this oath to their society! which gave these mem"ers special rights "y society at large* this attracted
people who aspired to "e in high places! which was exploited "y the free masons especially! "ecause so
many people in high places were masons and they declared themselves to "e the defacto elite! "y "eing
called +private individuals+ in order to distinguish, privilege themselves as not -ust "eing an ordinary citi'en.
2. MOER! A" FREEMA! MO#EME!$: .in Canada/ The motivating fact that "rought life "ac& to the
freeman movement was that with the forming of 0A1TA .1223/ all loyal su"-ects "ecame +ordinary
residents+ .to "e ordered around/ and this formally made us slaves! and fran&ly you can nitpic& at what
event was the tipping point! "ut we &now that things went to irrepara"ly worse! when the $A4 secretly
changed their oath of 1563 .or so/! where they respected the 7ueen+s interests! and now converted their
oath "ac& to 8. 9enry the :
th
oath! .in 1223/ where they returned to now o"eying the ;overeign+s .money+s/
interests. (ith this! they could now passed the 122: P<=CE ACT .for example/! where the oath to every
office across Canada changed! and they "ecame officially the privileged private individuals of a ruling
class that can commit +criminal acts+ against +ordinary citi'ens+ in order to protect their free man status in
what they call +a free and democratic society+ -.This article expands on our filing with our ;CC of <ct 1%!
2>1? - www.scri"d.com,doc,2?211>5>>,;CC-ntervener-filing-final-articles/ 4ead it to explain this further
3. Since then, %& 'enry(s hi)h*ay ro++ery tactics ha,e le)ally returned, .for example/. This resulted in a
predica"le response of citi'ens expressing a right to this ancient freeman common law heritage! and 2>
years later! there are all &inds of case law saying that +ordinary citi'ens+ have no implied license to do what
is not directly permitted .li&e/ drive without a drivers license! smo&ing in pu"lic! and not arguing with a cop!
in order to only "e su"mitted to a fine! instead of charged for o"-ecting to their ar"itrary orders .for example/
4. -! FA.$: (e can say that PA4T-2 of the 122: Police Act .page.2-lin& a"ove/ was very successful at its+
commission to destroy all loyal su"-ects! of their common law freeman rights as ;upreme in a Canada.
AS /E SEE -$: .with this ;CC case ruling/ www.scri"d.com,doc,2???>:>25,<n-the-1elger-Case-(here-(e-
#o-1rom-9ere The ;CC "rought this file forward "ecause in they might have erred in +commercial premise+.
This article addresses the fact that under the fiduciary trust of our Party+s ru"ric! means we have a duty to
Peacefully intervene in this -urisdictional issue of not "eing su"-ect to "eing governed under @aritime =aw
a. It's a fundamental: an EAA agent especially! .or a mem"er of the @ari-uana Party/ can protect our
"eliefs "ecause we are a minority party in a recogni'ed private individuals clu" calledB Parliament! A0A
". As long as we govern ourselves under the Elections Act with sound common law commercial practices
means we .acting under an EAA/ can protect our minority "eliefs to legally grow plants! then process the
harvest into inventory! and sell this harvest to private individuals thru Private @em"ership Co-op Clu"s
c. That saidB Any citi'en has a right to private individual rights "y su"scri"ing with any official 1ederal
Party! and in any court! they can defend Conservative Party "eliefs to defend their actions .for example/
d. .in our case/ 0o Tax court can ta&e away our right to defend our @ari-uana Party+s ru"ric! thru what
they define as +sophisticated means+ .as in/ pressing positive law under what+s not directly prohi"ited.
e. (hat we are pressing is the fact that it really is impossi"le to not go immediately to Tax Court! if any
EAA agency is ta&en down! "ecause of our C%5-24: sales tax ,tax credit loophole* $ECA);E of this! it
means we can continue to operate our +commercial premise+! until told otherwise in a final Tax Court Trial.
5. Our present concern is $'-S: .when there+s 5> or so clu"s in Cancouver/ Police will go after the easiest
targets to shut down first. That means there+s a 1
st
wave! then a 2
nd
wave of arrests! "ecause they simply
cannot process that many case all at once. www.scri"d.com,doc,2>6%232%:,2a-s-55-of-the-CA;A-report
- (hat these dispensaries and their growers need to accept is that they are on a sin&ing @aritime ship! "y
not protecting themselves from those 1EAE4A= C<)4T rulings. (hat they intend on doing is prescri"ed
in the last Throne ;peech with s-55 of the CA;A* there+s nothing new to indicate that it+s not -ust "usiness
as usual at the CA;A! in order to &eep their cash-cow 9armaceutical ndustry stoc& holders happy.
As *e see it: 0ot distancing yourself with our new tactics! ma&es you into a victim of their a"use of power
6. n our case! The ;CC .seeing a higher scope to things/ can see that we are creating a trap where if they
destroy our +@ari-uana Party+s private individual rights+ means they have to trample on their own rights.
They actually have a long case law history of doing -ust that when pushed to apply positive law remedies.
/'ERE /E(RE 0O-!0 /-$' $'-S: t+s a lost cause for a citi'en to fight a common law freeman
rights in any court! due to all these new case precedents. $)T they opened this door for operating
under +commercial premise+! even when that+s exposing one of their "ig loophole. .as in/ The ;CC
gave this privilege to the Conservative caucus under =ord $righton+s @andate .in 12:1/ .$runnel v
9er @a-esty/ and it applies to any <pposition EAA! who wants to use it too! under the Elections Act.

%. $ecause of callous private individuals who love their privileged status results in 9arper getting away with
destroying citi'ens of our fundamental 1reedom* $)T this fact has not escaped the pu"lic conscience.
a. .ASE -! PO-!$: (hen we try to promote this notion of holding genuine private individual rights!
we get immediately la"elled as those freeman! who invite you into constantly going to -ail for defending
that as a citi'en! you have a fiduciary right to do what you thin& is right. #ood people are programmed
to "elieve that they must dismiss you as a political terrorist for not accepting that 9arper too& it away.
". Aespair rules when we+re trying to impress any citi'en to ta&e a chance on winning genuine private
individual rights thru our tax loophole under the Elections Act. 1ran&ly! every canna"is activist is right
in "elieving that no cit'ens+ rights have every really "een respected! "y corporations li&e the CA;A
:. So *hy )o *ith this le)al *ordcraft 1urisdictional defence2 $ecause when you get right down to it!
laws are nothing "ut carefully crafted words on paper. A0A "ecause we can* this positive law application
-ust might win especially under a ;ec : Territorial necessity defence! "ecause it+s "etter than excepting to
role over and o"ey their next court ruling! and doing nothing to get out of a trap! until after it+s too late.
a. O! $'-S: What defines too late? To "e mis+ta&en+ "y police as a +retail premise+ is all it ta&es to "e on
that 1
st
warrant-list! and all it ta&es to "e on this list is to not "e following this new rule to remit a #;T ,9;T.
After that! to get on the 2
nd
warrant-list is determined "y shutting down those who are paying taxes $)T
"rea&ing any of their new 1ederal Court rules .li&e they do now! after all selective enforcement wor&s/.
". All we .any well structured EAA/ can do is offer a platform that is "etter then getting a lawyer to "eg
the courts to reconsider that a -udge erred in a ;upreme Court decision! after you+re shut down.
c. f or when the A# gets around to prosecuting one of our EAA agencies! means the EAA itself then can
defend that the ;CC openly admitted to erring on how to apply case law on our commercial premise.
d. <ur defence is not the same as this freeman position! some would ague the exact opposite! "ecause
we actually hold a fiduciary trust to protect our @ari-uana Party ru"ric! underta&e 1reedom of Contract

2. -f you care not to +e protected *ith our defence then that(s your choice3 $)T our defence is "ased
on getting to a Tax Court after ,if getting "usted! where we can get a ;ec : in-unction under the Trespass
Act! in order to carry-on doing our commercial premise! until a Tax court trial can rule on this case!
"ecause fran&ly that+s what creating a genuine positive law application of law graces us with. 1ran&ly Tax
Courts are constantly ma&ing positive law applications! their rulings come in months not decades! and their
decision is final* so we+re ta&ing a chance on doing something no one has tried! "ecause it should wor&
a. BE.A4SE -! O4R .ASE under the $erritories Act, *e can 5and do6 stand7under the fact $'A$:
the Territory calledB Parliament! is on eDual footings as the Territory calledB 1irst 0ations! and that
results in a situation where .-ust li&e! every recogni'ed 1irst 0ation =and/ Police cannot enforce
@aritime -urisdiction! on this treaty land. Police respect that they cannot do much a"out "eing not
welcome on their land! and Police ."y and large/ respect their mem"ers rights on undisputed lands.
". An EAA agency+s Postal Code holds the same status as a recogni'ed 1irst 0ation+s title to their land to
govern themselves under common law! in order to protect the rights of our @ari-uana Party mem"ership.
c. $he courts must defend these ri)hts: it(s an inherent social contract to protect minority +eliefs
of even the @ari-uana Party to actually deny consent to "e governed under @aritime -urisdiction.
d. (ho can "lame us for thin&ing that @arguerite @eed was right in sayingB Never doubt that a small
group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.
1>. 1ran&ly! when anyone loo&s at what our $C EAAs are up to! will get the clear impression that this is -ust
another article in chin&ing away at another "ric& in the wall that eventually tears down systemic tyranny.
<ur primarily o"-ective is to create a positive law application that restores common law right to everyone
A0A things are in place for +interesting times+! which is an old Chinese curse a"out a time -ust li&e these.
Aar& forces are steering us to another ma&e-over* we stand against their principalities! "y holding
our "reastplate of righteousness! and thru Peaceful means strive for the impossi"le. So be it.