are w ell-accustom ed to the pro- duction of no-slum p concrete in the m anufacture of their prod- ucts. O n occasion, the ready m ixed con- crete supplier m ay be called upon to fur- nish no-slum p concrete for sp ecial applications. N o-slum p concrete can range from a dense, closed graded m aterial to a porous, open- or gap-graded m aterial. The m ost com m on dense, closed graded m ateri- al is roller-com pacted concrete (RCC). It derives its nam e from the fact that it is com pacted or consolidated by roller; sim i- lar to those used in earthw ork and asphalt construction. O n the other end of the spec- trum of no-slum p concrete is open-graded, porous, no-fines concrete w hich is fre- quently referred to as pervious concrete. Applications Roller-com pacted concrete has been used in slab and pavem ent construction and in the m odification of w ater-retaining struc- tures. RCC is a rapid m ethod of construc- tion, and, therefore, usually requires a large volum e of concrete in a short period of tim e. W hile m any applications such as dam s or large storage areas require on-site plants w ith dedicated production, som e projects are w ell-suited for no-slum p con- crete produced by a ready m ix supplier. These applications include the paving of streets and parking lots and m inor m odifi- cations to local earthen dam s to provide overtopping or increase spillw ay capacity. Pervious or popcornconcrete has seen m ore w idespread use in parking lot pave- m ents in Florida than in any other area be- cause of governm ent regulations on storm w ater retention. It has adequate strength to resist dam age from traffic, but resistance of pervious concrete, w hen saturated, to freeze- thaw cycles is low . Therefore, it is usually not recom m ended for use in severe expo- sure conditions. H ow ever, it does have ex- cellent free-draining and structural properties that m ake it ideal for subbase pavem ents even in very harsh clim ates. It is interesting to note that no-fines concrete has been used in Europe and Canada in load-bearing w alls for single and m ultistory structures w here Tips for roller- compacted and pervious concrete By Gary R. Mass Producing no-slump concrete A l l
p h o t o s
c o u r t e s y
o f
G a r y
R .
M a s s A common application for no-slum p concrete is for roller-com pacted concrete. Roller-com pacted concrete is typically used in the construc- tion or rehabilitation of dam s. The spillw ay of the dam in the photo is being m odified. econom y, higher insulative value, low er shrinkage, and low er w eight provide advan- tages over conventional concrete. Mixtures At present, the Am erican Concrete Insti- tute standard ACI 211.3 does not specifical- ly address the proportioning of either roller-com pacted or pervious concrete. A revision of this docum ent is under w ay and w ill soon be published that w ill add proce- dures for these specialized m aterials. Roller-compacted concrete. A s w ith conventional concrete, Abram s law applies to RCC: As w ater-to-cem ent ratio increases, strength decreases. For m ost RCC applica- tions, the content of cem entitious m aterials usually ranges from 6% to 17% correspond- ing to approxim ately 200 to 600 pcy. The m inim um cem ent content for pavem ent ap- plication is around 10% in order to provide sufficient paste for surface sm oothness. The best m ethod for selecting the w ater content of RCC m ixtures for sm all projects is by the m oisture density relationship that is used for determ ining optim um m oisture con- tent and m axim um density of soil m ixtures. Laboratory testing should be used to establish these values based on the content of cem en- titious m aterial and grading of the aggregate. D uring actual production, the m oisture content should be adjusted so that the m ix- ture w ill support the w eight of the roller during com paction. If a heavy, sm ooth drum , vibratory com pactor is used, a slight roll or pressure w ave of m aterial should be seen in the front of the roller drum . If the vibratory drum appears to ride on the sur- face or jum p w ithout bringing up m ortar for a surface seal, the m ixture is too dry. W orking w ith the m aterial w ill soon estab- lish the desired lim its for m oisture content. W here the com pacted surface of the RCC w ill be the finished surface of a pavem ent and w here surface sm oothness and ride quality are im portant, the nom inal m axi- m um size of coarse aggregate should be 3 4 inch. ASTM C33 Size N o. 67 coarse aggre- gate should be com bined w ith fine aggre- gate to produce a total aggregate grading w ithin the follow ing lim its: Sieve size Percent passing 1 in. 100 3 4 in. 83-100 1 2 in. 72-93 3 8 in. 66-85 N o. 4 51-69 N o. 8 38-56 N o. 16 28-46 N o. 30 18-36 N o. 50 11-27 N o. 100 6-18 N o. 200 2-8 W here RCC pavem ent sm oothness is not critical and in applications for hydraulic structures, the nom inal m axim um size of coarse aggregate can be as large as 1 1 2 inches. The 1 1 2-inch m ixture should contain at least 52% to 56% w ell-graded coarse ag- gregate by absolute volum e. The rem aining volum e of the m ixture w ill then consist of cem entitious m aterial, w ater, and fine ag- gregate. If 1-inch nom inal m axim um size aggregate is used, the content of coarse ag- gregate should be 48% to 54% by absolute volum e. Entrapped air in these m ixtures usually ranges betw een 1% and 2% . Chem ical adm ixtures such as air-entrain- ing or w ater-reducing adm ixtures can be used. Their effectiveness, how ever, in no- slum p concrete m ixtures is questionable. D espite a lack of properly entrained air, RCC has perform ed very w ell in pavem ents even in the severe clim ate of Canada. Re- sistance appears to relate to the m ixture proportions and com pacted density of this m aterial. W ater-reducing adm ixtures are com m only used in RCC m ixtures. Pervious concrete. N o-slum p pervious concrete m ixtures com m only use a single coarse aggregate size consisting of A STM C33 size N o. 8 ( 3 8 inch to N o. 8), although aggregate sizes N o. 7 and N o. 67 have been used. This creates a void content in the m ixture of 15% to 25% . The content of Pervious concrete is another form of no- slum p concrete and it is used in pavem ents to fa- cilitate drainage. coarse aggregate per cubic yard is based on the dry rodded unit w eight of the aggregate tim es 27 cu- bic feet in a cubic yard. The cem ent content is in the range of 400 to 600 pcy. The w ater content of pervious concrete is critical and is usually confined to a narrow range. If the w ater content is too low , a poor paste-to-aggregate bond and loss of strength occurs and it is difficult to get the m aterials properly m ixed. If the w ater content is too high, the paste w ill not adhere to the aggre- gate and w ill flow dow nw ard, blinding the void structure and also causing a loss in strength. The correct w ater content gives the m ixture a w et-m etallic appear- ance, or sheen, w ith all coarse ag- gregate particles coated w ith paste. N orm ally, the w ater-to-cem ent ratio of pervious concrete w ill range from 0.35 to 0.45. The strength properties of pervious concrete can be im proved w ith the addition of sm all am ounts of fine aggregate up to about 20% by w eight of total ag- gregate, but this w ill reduce the perm eability of the m aterial. Som e experim entation is recom m ended to determ ine the appropriate m ix- ture for a specific application. Batching and mixing The production of a w ell-m ixed, no-slum p concrete requires special attention. B lock and precast pro- ducers are aw are of the difficulty in producing a continuous supply of a consistent and uniform m ixture and usually em ploy specialized m ixing equipm ent to m eet their specific needs. A s w ith any concrete, no-slum p concrete m ixtures com ing out of the plant w ill only be as uniform as the m aterials entering the plant. Therefore, the quality control of m aterials should follow the norm al recom m ended practices including handling and storage to prevent segregation or contam ination. M ost roller-com pacted concrete is produced in continuous pugm ill m ixing plants or by central batching and m ixing plants. For large projects, the plant is generally located on-site and has dedicated production as m entioned. The prim ary reason for having an on-site plant is the high production necessary w ith the rapid construction of RCC. H ow ever, this does not exclude the use of ready m ixed concrete w hen haul distance is reasonable and adequate produc- tion can be m aintained. It is som etim es advantageous to schedule such w ork at night to avoid interference w ith norm al cus- tom er dem ands. Central m ixing is recom m ended over truck m ixing because of the difficulty in m ixing and discharge of no-slum p concrete w ith truck m ixers. H ow ever, truck m ixers have been used on at least tw o projects, O coee N o. 2 D am in Tennessee and the Rosebud D am in South D akota. At O coee N o. 2, em ergency w ork w as needed to repair the existing tim ber crib dam . The nearest con- crete supplier w as approxim ately 40 m iles from the project. N o-slum p concrete w as dry-batched into a truck m ixer w hich m ixed the con- crete at the plant. The truck m ixer then discharged the m ixture into end dum p trucks for transportation to the site. Because of the distance involved, close coordination of all activities w as required. Approxim ately 4,700 cubic yards of RCC w as truck-m ixed for over- topping protection on Rosebud D am . A sm all test section w as used to dem onstrate the feasibility of this approach. The no-slum p concrete w as p roduced in 8-cubic-yard batches in trucks w ith m ixing ca- pacities of 8 1 2 to 10 1 2 cubic yards. A m inim um of 120 revolutions at m ix- ing speed w as required. The truck m ixers discharged onto a conveyor w hich w as used to place this con- crete. The peak production rate w as 85 cubic yards per hour and averaged approxim ately 70 cubic yards per hour. The typical truck discharge tim e w as eight m inutes w hen the front axle w as elevated on a ram p. It is im portant to note that w hen truck m ixing is used, special atten- tion should be given to the m ixture proportioning to assure that the no- slum p concrete can be m ixed to the necessary degree of uniform ity and can be discharged at a reasonable rate. Reference N o. 4 on propor- tioning should be consulted w hen truck-m ixed RCC is contem plated. Pervious concrete can be pro- duced by either a central m ixing plant or truck m ixing w ithout m ajor difficulty. Som e experim entation m ay be required to determ ine the am ount of w ater to be added to truck m ixers, prior to batching oth- er m aterials, to prevent head pack- ing. The am ount of w ater appears to be related to the rate at w hich the trucks are charged. Faster charging rates w ill usually require m ore initial w ater in the drum . R egardless of the m ethod of batching or m ixing equip m ent used, the m ost consistent no-slum p concrete m ixture w ill be produced w hen all m aterials are ribbon fed into the m ixer during charging. N orm al m ixing tim e appears to be adequate. If it is questionable, rou- tine m ixer perform ance tests can be m ade to determ ine the m inim um m ixing tim e. Producers should be aw are that no-slum p concrete tends to build up on equipm ent faster than con- ventional concrete, and m ore fre- quent cleaning m ay be required. Testing B y definition, the aspect of no- slum p concrete w hich separates it from m ost other concrete w ork is the m easurem ent of consistency. A CI 211.3 is a procedure for pro- portioning no-slum p concrete and includes various test m ethods w hich have been used to m easure the consistency of no-slum p con- crete m ixtures. In 1991, ASTM ap- p roved and p ublished A ST M C 1170, Standard Test M ethods for D eterm ining Consistency and D en- sity of Roller-Com pacted Concrete U sing a V ibrating Table,w hich now provides a standard test for m easuring the consistency of this concrete. U nfortunately and unlike the slum p test, ASTM C 1170 is not suitable for field use because of the equipm ent requirem ents. O n large roller-com pacted con- crete projects, w here a field labora- tory can be justified, ASTM C 1170 is usually specified to m easure con- sistency. H ow ever, on m ost sm aller projects that are suited to ready m ixed concrete, the producer and user m ay have to rely on other m ethods of m onitoring and m ain- taining uniform ity in the consisten- cy of concrete delivered to the w ork. These m ethods include visual appearance of the m aterial itself, vi- sual appearance of the m aterial un- der action of vibration, or the m ea- surem ent of m oisture content of the m aterial. Com pressive strength specim ens can be cast for both RCC m ixtures and pervious concrete m ixtures us- ing slightly m odified procedures from those used w ith conventional concrete. Steel m olds should be used and the m aterial should be com pacted in layers. C om pactive effort should be applied to each layer by m eans of a rigid steel plate that just fits inside the m old and a hand-held pneum atic or electric tam per. Com pactive effort should continue until each layer is consid- ered w ell-com pacted. Excess m ater- ial should be struck off, and the top of the specim en finished as sm ooth as possible. There is no standard test m ethod for p rep aration of strength specim ens of no-slum p concrete m ixtures. Gary R. Mass, P.E., is a concrete and materials consultant affiliated with Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates Inc. in Denver. He is also past chairman of Committee 211, Proportioning Con- crete; Committee 309, Consolidation of Concrete; and Committee 304, Measur- ing, Mixing, Transporting, and Placing Concrete. He is also a member of ASTM C 9, Concrete and Concrete Materials. References 1 . AC I C o m m itte e 2 1 1 , Sta n d a rd P ra ctice fo r Se le ctin g P ro p o rtio n s fo r N o -Slu m p C o n cre te AC I 2 1 1 . 3 - 7 5 ) R e vise d 1 9 8 7 ) R e -a p p ro ve d 1 9 9 2 ) , Am e rica n C o n cre te I n sti- tu te , D e tro it, 1 9 9 2 , 1 9 p p . 2 . AC I C o m m itte e 3 2 5 , Sta te -o f- th e -Art R e p o rt o n R o lle r-C o m p a ct- e d C o n cre te P a ve m e n ts AC I 3 2 5 - 1 0 R -9 5 ) , A m e ri c a n C o n c re t e In stitu te , D e tro it, 1 9 9 5 , 3 2 p p . 3 . R C C N e w sle tte r, R o lle r-C o m - p a cte d C o n cre te D e sig n a n d C o n - stru ctio n , P o rtla n d C e m e n t Asso ci- a tio n , Sko kie , V . 9 , N o . 2 , Win te r 1 9 9 3 , 4 p p . 4 . C a n n o n , R . W. , P ro p o rtio n in g N o -Slu m p C o n cre te fo r E xp a n d e d Ap p lica tio n s, Concret e Int erna- t ional, V . 4 , N o . 8 , Au g u st, 1 9 8 2 , p p . 4 3 -4 7 . 5 . C o n stru ctio n o f P o rtla n d C e - m e n t P e rvio u s P a ve m e n t, F lo rid a C o n cre te a n d P ro d u cts A sso ci a - tio n , P a vin g In fo rm a tio n B u lle tin , 5 p p . 6 . M e in in g e r, R . C . , N o -F in e s P e rvi- o u s C o n cre te fo r P a v i n g , Con- crete International, V. 1 0 , N o . 8 , Au g u st 1 9 8 8 , p p . 2 0 -2 7 . 7 . M a lh o tra , V. M . , N o -F in e s C o n - cre te I ts P ro p e rtie s a n d Ap p lica - tio n s, ACI Journal, P ro ce e d in g s V . 7 3 , N o . 1 1 , N o ve m b e r 1 9 7 6 , p p . 6 2 8 -6 4 4 . PUBLICATION #J 960039 Copyright 1996, The Aberdeen Group, All rights reserved