Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 53, NO. 3, MARCH 2005
I. INTRODUCTION
Manuscript received March 17, 2004; revised July 17, 2004. This work was
supported by the National Science Council, Republic of China, under Grants
NSC 92-2213-E-002-067 and NSC 93-2213-E-002-091.
The authors are with the Graduate Institute of Communication Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. (e-mail:
jma@ew.ee.ntu.edu.tw; skjeng@ew.ee.ntu.edu.tw).
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TAP.2004.842648
1195
Fig. 1. Geometry of the antenna. (a) Top layer. (b) Bottom layer. (c)
Cross-sectional view.
with the radiation patterns and the fidelity related to the transient properties, are adopted to quantitatively describe the performances of UWB antennas in both frequency and time domains. In Section V, the effects of varying the geometric parameters on the antenna performance are discussed. To achieve additional flexibility in circuit integration, a miniaturized version
of the proposed antenna is investigated at the end of this paper.
II. GEOMETRY AND DESIGN GUIDELINES
The geometry of the proposed antenna with its parameters
plane and the
is depicted in Fig. 1. The antenna lies in the
normal direction is parallel to the axis. The radiating annular
slot and its tapered-slot feeding structure are on the top layer of
the substrate whereas the microstrip line and its open stub are
printed on the bottom layer of it. The substrate is with height
is the
where
approximated longest current path along the inner boundary of
the annular slot, is the speed of light and
is the effective dielectric constant. The dimension of the wideband microstrip line-to-slotline transition is then designed to
maximize the antenna impedance bandwidth. The highest operof the antenna is related to that of the wideating frequency
band transition. After determining the operating bandwidth, the
matellization around the antenna is adjusted to minimize the required dimension while preserving the impedance bandwidth.
Following this design guideline, two versions of the proposed
antenna, the reference antenna and the miniature antenna, were
designed on a Rogers RT/Duroid 5880 substrate with
mm and
. Their geometric parameters are summarized
in Table I. The dimensions of the reference and miniature antennas are 46.5 by 66.3 mm and 35.6 by 40.3 mm , respectively, and are only 50.5% and 23.5% that of the antenna in [17].
The measured return losses of the antennas are then depicted in
Fig. 2. The operating bandwidth of the reference antenna with
dB (or
) covers almost the whole
allocated UWB spectrum from 3.1 to 10.6 GHz. The miniature
antenna, a miniaturized version of the proposed antenna, operates only from 4.8 to 10.2 GHz. Though the miniature antenna
fails to cover the whole UWB spectrum, as will be discussed
in Section V, the corresponding performance does not degrade
significantly. Besides the reference and miniature antennas, six
additional antennas were fabricated on the same substrate to
verify the empirical formula (1), and their corresponding parameters are also summarized in Table I. According to the table, the
1196
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 53, NO. 3, MARCH 2005
TABLE I
GEOMETRIC PARAMETERS OF THE ANTENNAS AND THE CORRESPONDING PREDICTED AND MEASURED OPERATING BANDS
Fig. 2.
(2)
1197
the band. The group delay is also required to be constant over the
entire band. Various literature has been devoted to evaluating the
antenna transfer functions [19][23]. With the applied voltage
at the transmitting antenna terminal, the output voltage at
the receiving antenna terminal can be expressed by [20]
(3)
and
are the normalized imwhere
pulse responses (IRs) of the transmitting and receiving antennas,
respectively, and R is the distance between the virtual sources
of the antennas. Converting (3) to frequency domain and using
, we have [21]
the fact that
(4)
and
are defined as
the dimensionless normalized antenna transfer functions of the
transmitting and receiving antennas, respectively, and are mod.
ifications of those in [20] with a normalization factor
To experimentally evaluate this normalized antenna transfer
function, in this paper the conventional two-antenna gain
measurement arrangement [24] is improved to add the required
phase information. Referring to Fig. 5, the position and polarization of the transmitting antenna were fixed during the
measurement. The AUT or the standard antenna was mounted
on a rotation positioner as the receiving antenna. The virtual
sources of the AUT and standard antenna were first evaluated
[20] and aligned with the rotation center of the positioner.
in (4) was then
The transmission scattering parameter
measured by an HP 8722ES network analyzer. Note that the
reference planes were calibrated to the antenna terminals in
advance. The normalized antenna transfer function of the AUT
can now be expressed by
In (4),
Fig. 3. Measured radiation patterns of the reference antenna at 6.5 GHz in (a)
E plane. (b) H plane.
(5)
1198
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 53, NO. 3, MARCH 2005
where
is the measured transmission scattering
is
parameter of the AUT at a specific angle
that of the standard antenna in its maximum gain direction, and
is the normalized antenna transfer function of the
standard antenna.
, we assume that the
To simplify the evaluation of
standard antenna is well matched to the measurement system
and has constant group delay over the frequency band of interest.
can be derived from [20],
With these assumptions,
[23]
(6)
where is the ratio of the characteristic impedance of the measurement system to the intrinsic impedance of free space, is
and
are the efthe constant group delay, and
fective height and gain of the standard antenna, respectively. By
substituting (6) into (5), the normalized antenna transfer function of the AUT can be readily achieved.
In this paper, a Spectrum Technologies International
DRH-118 double-ridged horn antenna was chosen to be
the standard antenna. This antenna has proved to be well
matched to the measurement system, and with constant group
delay over the frequency band of interest. The group delay
of the standard antenna, which is 630 ps, can be readily determined since the position of the virtual source has been
specified. Referring to the data sheet, the absolute gain can
be obtained as well. Fig. 6(a) then illustrates the magnitude
of the normalized antenna transfer functions of the reference
in
plane. From this
antenna at
figure, we observe that the transfer functions are rather flat over
the frequency band of interest except for that at the backward
plane). Measured group delays are
direction (i.e., 180 in
depicted in Fig. 6(b) and are nearly constant over the frequency
band of interest. As a consequence, the proposed antenna has
proved to be suitable for UWB radios.
Fig. 6. (a) Magnitudes of the normalized antenna transfer functions. (b) Group
delays of the reference antenna at = 0 ; 90 ; 180 ; 270 in H plane.
1199
Fig. 8. (a) Waveform of the incident pulse arriving at the receiving antenna. (b)
Spectrum of the incident pulse normalized to the FCC indoor emission mask.
(7)
and
ns. The normalized specwhere
of this pulse is illustrated in Fig. 8(b), and proves
trum
to comply with the required FCC indoor emission mask. Further refining the pulse spectrum can be achieved by utilizing
some optimization algorithms [6][8]. The pulse spectrum is
then multiplied by the normalized antenna transfer functions
and an inverse Fourier transform is performed to achieve the
required time domain response. The output waveform at the receiving antenna terminal can therefore be expressed by
(8)
where
represents an ideal bandpass filter from 1 to 18
GHz. Fig. 9(a) and (b) illustrates the received waveforms at the
reference antenna terminal as equals 0 , 90 , 180 , and 270
1200
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 53, NO. 3, MARCH 2005
Fig. 10.
=
(a)
(9)
The fidelity in (9) is in essence the correlation coefficient of
the template and received pulses. It quantitatively describes how
similar the received pulse is to the template pulse. The fidelity
reaches unity as the two pulses are exactly the same in shape,
which means the receiving antenna does not distort the incident
pulse at all. Fig. 10 shows the fidelity of the reference antenna
1201
frequency band of interest. The reason can be explained as follows. Due to the insufficient impedance bandwidth of the miniature antenna, it inevitably introduces more distortions to the incident pulses. However, as long as the operating band of this
antenna covers the spectrum in which the pulse energy concentrates, the antenna performance can be mostly preserved. With
this observation, further miniaturizing the antenna dimension
to add flexibility in circuit integration can be readily achieved
even though the antenna itself may not cover the entire allocated
UWB spectrum.
VI. CONCLUSION
Fig. 11. Variations of the (a) uniformity and (b) fidelity with respect to the
(Designs I, III, and IV).
variations of the slot width
In this paper, a novel UWB tapered-slot-fed annular slot antenna has been proposed and demonstrated. With the help of a
dimensionless normalized antenna transfer function, the performance of the proposed antenna has been experimentally investigated. The overall response with a pair of identical antennas
can be also derived with this transfer function. Meanwhile, two
quantitative measures, the uniformity and fidelity, are evaluated
from the measured data and reveal that this antenna not only
exhibits almost uniform radiation patterns but also introduces
limited distortion to baseband signals. It therefore substantiates
the applicability of the proposed antenna in UWB radios. Effects of varying the geometric parameters on the antenna performance and miniaturizing the antenna dimension with some
performance tradeoff have also been discussed. The future work
will be in examining the effects of pulse shape optimization on
the antenna performance.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the
reviewers, Dr. C.-H. Tseng and Dr. S.-C. Yen for their thoughtful
comments, and to J. Long for reading the revised manuscript.
REFERENCES
[1] D. G. Leeper, UltrawidebandThe next step in short-range wireless,
in IEEE Radio Freq. Integrated Circuits Symp. Dig., Jun. 2003, pp.
493496.
1202
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 53, NO. 3, MARCH 2005
[2] G. R. Aiello, Challenges for ultra-wideband (UWB) CMOS integration, in IEEE Radio Freq. Integrated Circuits Symp. Dig., Jun. 2003,
pp. 497500.
[3] G. R. Aiello and G. D. Rogerson, Ultra-wideband wireless systems,
IEEE Microwave, vol. 4, pp. 3647, Jun. 2003.
[4] K. Siwiak, Ultra-wide band radio: Introducing a new technology, in
Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf., vol. 2, May 2001, pp. 10881093.
[5] First Report and Order, Revision of Part 15 of the Commissions Rule
Regarding Ultra Wideband Transmission Systems, Fed. Commun.
Comm., FCC 02-48, Apr. 22, 2002.
[6] D. M. Pozar, Waveform optimizations for ultra-wide-band radio systems, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 51, pp. 23352345, Sep.
2003.
[7] B. Parr, B. Cho, K. Wallace, and Z. Ding, A novel ultra-wideband pulse
design algorithm, IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 7, pp. 219221, May 2003.
[8] C. A. Corral, S. Sibecas, S. Emami, and G. Stratis, Pulse spectrum optimization for ultra-wideband communication, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Ultra
Wideband Syst. Technol., May 2002, pp. 3135.
[9] Z. N. Chen, X. H. Wu, N. Yang, and M. Y. W. Chia, Design consideration for antennas in UWB wireless communication systems, in IEEE
AP-S Int. Symp. Dig., vol. 1, Columbus, OH, Jun. 2003, pp. 822825.
, Planar square monopoles for UWB radio systems, in Proc.
[10]
Asia-Pacific Microwave Conf., vol. 3, Seoul, Korea, Nov. 2003, pp.
16321635.
[11] N. P. Agrawall, G. Kumar, and K. P. Ray, Wide-band planar monopole
antennas, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 46, pp. 294295, Feb.
1998.
[12] H. G. Schantz and L. Fullerton, The diamond dipole: A Gaussian impulse antenna, in IEEE AP-S Int. Symp. Dig., vol. 4, Boston, MA, Jul.
2001, pp. 100103.
[13] H. G. Schantz, Planar elliptical element ultra-wideband dipole antennas, in IEEE AP-S Int. Symp. Dig., vol. 3, San Antonio, TX, Jun.
2002, pp. 4447.
, UWB magnetic antennas, in IEEE AP-S Int. Symp. Dig., vol. 3,
[14]
Columbus, OH, Jun. 2003, pp. 604607.
[15] W. Sorgel, C. Waldschmidt, and W. Wiesbeck, Transient responses of
a Vivaldi antenna and a logarithmic periodic dipole array for ultra wideband communication, in IEEE AP-S Int. Symp. Dig., vol. 3, Columbus,
OH, Jun. 2003, pp. 592595.
[16] T. G. Ma and S. K. Jeng, A novel compact ultra-wideband printed
dipole antenna with tapered slot feed, in IEEE AP-S Int. Symp. Dig.,
vol. 3, Columbus, OH, Jun. 2003, pp. 608611.
[17]
, A printed dipole antenna with tapered slot feed for ultra-wideband applications, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., to be published.
[18] B. Schuppert, Microstrip/slotline transitions: Modeling and experimental investigation, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 36, pp.
12721282, Aug. 1988.
[19] E. G. Farr and C. E. Baum, Extending the definitions of antenna gain
and radiation pattern into time domain, in Sens. Simulation Notes, Air
Force Res. Lab., note 350, 1992.
[20] B. Scheers, M. Acheroy, and A. Vander Vorst, Time-domain simulation and characterization of TEM horns using a normalized impulse response, IEE Proc.-Microw. Antennas Propag., vol. 147, pp. 463468,
Dec. 2000.
[21] A. Sibille, About the role of antennas in UWB impulse radio, presented at the 9th Management Committee Meeting of COST Action 273,
COST 273 TD (04) 15, Athens, OH, Greece, Jan. 2004.
[22] W. Soergel, F. Pivit, and W. Wiesbeck, Comparison of frequency domain and time domain measurement procedures for ultra wideband antennas, in Proc. Antenna and Measurement Tech. Assoc., 25th Ann.
Meeting and Symp., Irvine, CA, Oct. 2003, pp. 7276.
[23] C. E. Baum, E. G. Farr, and C. A. Frost, Transient gain of antennas
related to the traditional continuous-wave (CW) definition of gain, in
Proc. Ultra-Wideband Short-Pulse Electromagnetics 4, Jun. 1998, pp.
109118.
[24] G. E. Evans, Antenna Measurement Techniques. Norwood, MA:
Artech House, 1990.
[25] T. P. Montoya and G. S. Smith, A study of pulse radiation from several
broad-band loaded monopole, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 44,
pp. 11721182, Aug. 1996.
[26] O. E. Allen, D. A. Hill, and A. R. Ondrejka, Time-domain antenna characterizations, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 35, pp. 339346,
Aug. 1993.
[27] D. Lamensdorf and L. Susman, Baseband-pulse-antenna techniques,
IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 36, pp. 2030, Feb. 1994.