Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The attached
copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research
and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
and sharing with colleagues.
Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or
licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party
websites are prohibited.
In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the
article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or
institutional repository. Authors requiring further information
regarding Elseviers archiving and manuscript policies are
encouraged to visit:
http://www.elsevier.com/copyright
Composite Structures
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct
New exact solutions for free vibrations of thin orthotropic rectangular plates
Y.F. Xing *, B. Liu
The Solid Mechanics Research Center, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Available online 27 November 2008
Keywords:
Orthotropic
Thin plates
Free vibration
Frequency
Separation of variables
a b s t r a c t
In this paper, a novel separation of variables is presented for solving the exact solutions for the free vibrations of thin orthotropic rectangular plates with all combinations of simply supported (S) and clamped
(C) boundary conditions, and the correctness of the exact solutions are proved mathematically. The exact
solutions for the three cases SSCC, SCCC, and CCCC are successfully obtained for the rst time, although it
was believed that they are unable to be obtained. The new exact solutions are further validated by extensive numerical comparisons with the solutions of FEM and those available in the literature.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The orthotropic plates are commonly used in the elds of structural engineering and considered as the fundamental structural
elements [13] in aerospace, naval and ocean structures. The
orthotropic behavior not only arises from the use of materials with
such constitutive relations, many composite plates may be modeled analytically as orthotropic plates [4]. Isotropic plates altered
by metallurgical process along perpendicular directions, and panels unequally stiffened along two orthogonal directions, also exhibit orthotropic characteristics [1,4]. The wide use of such
structures requires investigating the vibration characteristics of
orthotropic plates in order to develop accurate and reliable design.
The study of the free vibration of plates dates back to the 1880s,
see references [57], as reported in the literature survey of Liew
and Xiang [8]. And an extensive review of the works up to 1985
has been given by Leissa in his monograph [9] and in a series of review articles [1013].
Problems involving rectangular plates fall into three distinct
categories [14]: (a) plates with all edges simply supported; (b)
plates with a pair of opposite edges simply supported; (c) plates
which do not fall into any of the above categories. Problems of
the rst and second categories are amenable to straightforward
rigorous analysis in terms of the well-known Navier and Levy solutions [15]. These methods can be simply extended to orthotropic
plates [16]. However, owing to coupled multiple differential equations of high order, it was believed that the problems of the third
category are difcult to deal with ([1,4] for example), rigorous analytical solutions, which satisfy the governing differential equation
and the boundary conditions exactly, turn out to be rare. For this
reason many efforts were devoted to develop approximate methods [1748].
Due to its high versatility and conceptual simplicity [17], the
RayleighRitz method is one of the most popular methods to obtain approximate solutions for the natural frequencies of an orthotropic rectangular plate. Hearmon [18] proposed an approximate
general solution for the free vibrations of the orthotropic plates
applying the Rayleigh method with characteristic beam functions.
Using a set of boundary characteristic orthogonal polynomials proposed by Bhat [19], Dickinson and Di Blasio [20] calculated the natural frequencies of rectangular orthotropic plates with various
boundary conditions. Particularly interesting, among the papers
using the RayleighRitz method, is the contribution of Marangoni
et al. [21], wherein the RayleighRitz method and the decomposition technique presented by Bazely et al. [22] were extended to
compute the upper and lower bounds of vibration frequencies for
clamped orthotropic rectangular plates. Rossi et al. [2] have used
the optimized RayleighRitz method and a pseudo-Fourier expansion to analyze the plates with one or more free edges, their results
showed excellent agreement with those obtained by means of
nite element method.
The method based on superposition of appropriate Levy type
solutions for the analysis of rectangular plates was rst illustrated
by Timoshenko and Krieger [23]. Gorman extended this method to
the free vibration analyses of isotropic [24], clamped orthotropic
[25], free orthotropic [26,27], point supported orthotropic [28],
and laminated symmetric cross-ply rectangular plates [29]. It has
been shown [30] that the approach is powerful for such problems
since the governing differential equation is satised rigorously at
every stage and the boundary conditions can be satised in a series
sense to any desired degree of accuracy. Yu and Cleghorn [31] em-
568
tions and eigenvalue equations for the boundary condition combinations SSCC, SCCC and CCCC are obtained through the mode
formulation and boundary conditions. In Section 4, the solution
method of the transcendental eigenvalue equations is discussed.
Numerical comparison studies are presented in Section 5, the conclusion follows.
t12
E1
t21
E2
D1
E1 h
;
121 t12 t21
D2
E2 h
;
121 t12 t21
D66
G12 h
12
D3 D12 2D66
where h is the thickness of the uniform plate, see Fig. 1. Using the
LoveKirchhoffs hypotheses, the differential equation of the free
vibration of orthotropic thin plate has the form
D1
@ 4 wx; y; t
@ 4 wx; y; t
@ 4 wx; y; t
@ 2 wx; y; t
2D
q
h
3
2
@x4
@x2 @y2
@y4
@t 2
0
3
Substitution of Eq. (4) into Eq. (3) results in the following partial differential equation involved the natural mode W(x,y) as
D1
@4W
@4W
@4W
2D3 2 2 D2
b4 W 0
@x4
@x @y
@y4
where the frequency parameter b4 = x2qh. The natural mode function W(x, y) can be solved from Eq. (5) in conjunction with the
boundary conditions. The simple or classical boundary conditions
for thin plate include the free, the simply supported and the
clamped. Consider a separation of variable solution
Wx; y /xwy
z
b
569
Thus two opposite edges of the plates must be simply supported, i.e.
w = sin cy or u = sin ax, so that the condition (8) can be satised.In
present paper, the authors assume the eigenfunctions in Eq. (7) as
/x Aelx ;
wy Beky
D1 l4 2D3 l2 k2 D2 k4 b4 0
10
This is the characteristic equation of Eq. (7) or Eq. (5). By solving Eq.
(10), one can obtain the characteristic roots
D3
d1 k
;
D1
#
u " 2
u 4 D3
D2
b4
t
#1 k
D1
D1
D1
p D
k1;2 i #2 d2 ia2 ;
12
p D
k3;4 #2 d2 b2
13ab
D3
d2 l2
;
D2
#
u " 2
4
u
D
D
b
3
1
#2 tl4
D2
D2
D2
W0; y 0 ) /0 0;
Wa; y 0 ) /a 0
19
14
uv
"
#
uu
2
uu
D3
D1
b4
D3
a21
a2 tta41
D2
D2
D2
D2
v
uv
"
#
uu
2
uu
D3
D1
b4
D3
t
4
a21
b2 t a1
D2
D2
D2
D2
15a
15b
D23
2
1
a
b21 2
12 3
1
0
1
0
A1
B
C6 B1 7
a
0
b
0
1
1
B
C6 7
@ cos a1 a
sin a1 a
cosh b1 a
sinh b1 a A4 C 1 5
H1
a1 sin a1 a a1 cos a1 a b1 sinh b1 a b1 cosh b1 a
2 3
0
607
7
6
405
0
20abcd
It can be solved from Eqs. (20a) and (20b) that
D1 D2 D23
where
b21 2
18
2
1
17
11ab
4b4
D1
16
A1 C 1
a1 B1 b1 H1
21
It is noteworthy that Eqs. (15) and (16) will be used to solve the frequencies, this is done below. According to the characteristic roots in
Eqs. (11) and (13), the two eigenfunctions or the two Levys solutions in Eq. (9) can be written as
S
(a) SSCC
sin a1 a sinh b1 a
!
C1
H1
0
0
22ab
a1
b1
cos a1 a cosh b1 a
C
(b) SCCC
C
(c) CCCC
570
Table 1
The eigensolutions for the cases SSCC, SCCC and CCCC.
SSCC
SCCC
Eigenvalue equations
Normal eigenfunctions
tan a1 a
a1 a
sin a1 a
/x sin a1 x sinh
sinh b1 x
b a
tanh b1 a
b1 a
tan a2 b
a2 b
tanh b2 b
b2 b
sin a2 b
wy sin a2 y sinh
sinh b2 y
b b
tan a1 a
a1 a
b1 a
tanh
0
b a
sin a1 a
/x sin a1 x sinh
sinh b1 x
b a
a2 b2
1cos a2 b cosh b2 b
sin a2 b sinh b2 b
22a2 b 2
2
1cos a1 a cosh b1 a
sin a1 a sinh b1 a
21a1 b 1
1
a2 b2
1cos a2 b cosh b2 b
sin a2 b sinh b2 b
22a2 b22
CCCC
a2 b2
For obtaining nontrivial solutions, the determinant of the coefcients matrix of the above homogeneous Eq. (22) must be zero, thus
the eigenvalue equation can be obtained as
sin a1 a sinh b1 a
2a1 b1
where k2
cos a1 a cosh b1 a
b1 =a1 sin a1 a sinh b1 a
24
25
Table 2
Four types of material properties.
M1
M2
M3
M4
the same way as above. The exact eigensolutions for cases SSCC,
SCCC and CCCC as shown in Fig. 2 are presented in Table 1. It should
be pointed out that the exact solutions for the three cases were not
available.
23
H1 k2 C 1
Material
E1 (GPa)
E2 (GPa)
G12 (GPa)
m12
q (kg/m)
T-graphite/epoxy
B-boron/epoxy
K-aryl/epoxy
E-glass/epoxy
185
208
76
60.7
10.5
18.9
5.6
24.8
7.3
5.7
2.3
12.0
0.28
0.23
0.34
0.23
1600
2000
1460
a1 a 2 mp; mp 0:5p; m 1; 2; . . .
a2 b 2 np; np 0:5p; n 1; 2; . . .
26
b1
s
D
a21 2k2 3
D1
27
Table 3
p
Frequency parameter c a 4 x2 qh=D1 for plates with a b=1m 1.2m and M1.
B.C.
Method
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
SSCC
Exact
FEM
4.02
4.02
4.38
4.39
5.09
5.10
6.06
6.07
7.12
7.12
7.17
7.17
7.27
7.28
7.59
7.59
8.09
8.09
8.34
8.35
SCCC
Exact
FEM
4.04
4.05
4.49
4.50
5.28
5.29
6.30
6.31
7.12
7.12
7.30
7.31
7.44
7.45
7.66
7.66
8.21
8.21
8.63
8.64
CCCC
Exact
FEM
4.80
4.81
5.08
5.10
5.68
5.70
6.56
6.57
7.60
7.62
7.89
7.90
8.03
8.04
8.31
8.32
8.74
8.75
8.76
8.77
Table 4
p
Frequency parameter c a 4 x2 qh=D1 for CCCC plates with variable b and M2.
b
Method
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
Exact
FEM
4.87
4.88
5.50
5.52
6.68
6.70
7.91
7.92
8.15
8.17
8.16
8.18
8.72
8.73
9.62
9.64
9.75
9.77
10.81
10.83
Exact
FEM
4.75
4.75
4.82
4.83
5.00
5.01
5.32
5.33
5.78
5.80
6.37
6.39
7.05
7.06
7.79
7.80
7.85
7.87
7.90
7.91
Exact
FEM
4.74
4.74
4.76
4.76
4.81
4.81
4.90
4.91
5.05
5.06
5.26
5.27
5.54
5.55
5.89
5.89
6.28
6.29
6.71
6.72
571
a1a and a2b, and the initial value of b1 can be computed through
s
D3
b1 2a22
a21
D1
Eq. (28).
28
Thus the interval of b1 is determined by Eq. (28), wherein the intervals of a1 and a2 are determined by Eq. (26). The middle values of
the intervals in Eqs. (26) are recommended as the initial values of
Table 5
p
Frequency parameters c a 4 x2 qh=D1 for CCCC plates with variable b and M3.
b
Method
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10th
Exact
FEM
4.85
4.87
5.41
5.44
6.48
6.50
7.87
7.85
7.92
7.92
8.15
8.16
8.66
8.67
9.33
9.35
9.47
9.48
10.54
10.56
Exact
FEM
4.75
4.75
4.82
4.82
4.98
4.99
5.26
5.27
5.68
5.69
6.21
6.22
6.83
6.84
7.50
7.51
7.87
7.88
7.90
7.91
Exact
FEM
4.74
4.74
4.76
4.76
4.81
4.81
4.90
4.90
5.03
5.04
5.22
5.23
5.47
5.48
5.77
5.78
6.12
6.13
6.52
6.53
Table 6
p
Frequency parameters cij xij a2 qh=D1 for D3 = D1, D2 = D1.
B.C.
b/a
References
(1, 1)
(2, 1)
(3, 1)
(1, 2)
(2, 2)
(3, 2)
SSCC
0.5
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
70.877
71.081
26.867
27.059
17.719
17.770
100.436
100.803
60.549
60.667
52.346
52.343
151.576
151.906
114.568
114.633
106.640
106.649
209.302
209.377
60.549
60.667
25.109
25.201
238.135
238.347
92.665
92.844
59.534
59.587
287.227
287.542
145.786
145.937
113.856
113.894
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
72.899
73.405
31.438
31.833
24.066
24.144
107.469
108.236
70.877
71.081
63.714
63.742
164.387
165.023
130.240
130.353
123.066
123.081
210.362
210.526
63.053
63.340
30.071
30.253
242.197
242.667
100.436
100.803
70.052
70.143
295.698
296.366
159.198
159.487
129.641
129.693
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
97.542
98.324
35.112
35.999
24.358
24.581
125.751
127.333
72.899
73.405
63.920
63.985
177.613
179.115
131.629
131.902
123.217
123.249
255.678
255.939
72.899
73.405
31.438
31.833
283.509
284.325
107.469
108.236
70.877
71.081
331.850
333.125
164.387
165.023
130.240
130.353
1.0
2.0
CSCC
0.5
1.0
2.0
CCCC
0.5
1.0
2.0
Mode shape
Table 7
p
Frequency parameters cij xij a2 qh=D1 for D3 = 0.5 D1, D2 = D1.
b/a
References
Mode shape
(3, 1)
(1, 2)
(2, 2)
(3, 2)
0.5
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
67.331
67.497
24.449
24.610
16.833
16.874
90.528
90.838
56.603
56.700
51.248
51.261
137.293
137.574
110.137
110.189
105.504
105.510
204.990
205.045
56.603
56.700
22.632
22.710
222.753
222.923
82.431
82.584
55.688
55.731
258.282
258.547
131.639
131.766
109.558
109.581
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
69.254
69.687
29.296
29.625
23.385
23.447
97.795
98.440
67.331
67.497
62.772
62.794
150.754
151.290
126.178
126.268
122.034
122.045
205.859
205.994
59.021
59.270
27.906
28.057
226.410
226.800
90.528
90.838
66.600
66.672
266.561
267.127
145.751
145.990
125.690
125.730
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
94.725
95.391
33.174
33.917
23.681
23.848
117.182
118.502
69.254
69.687
62.939
62.991
164.294
165.583
127.382
127.613
122.150
122.175
251.755
251.965
69.254
69.687
29.296
29.625
269.323
269.987
97.795
98.440
67.331
67.497
304.619
305.677
150.754
151.290
126.178
126.268
(1, 1)
SSCC
1.0
2.0
CSCC
0.5
1.0
2.0
CCCC
0.5
1.0
2.0
(2, 1)
572
Table 8
p
Frequency parameters cij xij a2 qh=D1 for D3 = 0.5 D1, D2 = 0.5 D1.
b/a
References
Mode shape
(3, 1)
(1, 2)
(2, 2)
(3, 2)
0.5
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
51.302
51.507
21.898
22.042
16.609
16.638
79.310
79.602
55.508
55.578
51.159
51.168
130.072
130.294
109.529
109.564
105.451
105.455
148.490
148.564
44.228
44.342
20.844
20.910
172.181
172.386
74.462
74.599
54.959
54.990
216.154
216.429
126.736
126.835
109.162
109.178
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
53.831
54.344
27.258
27.527
23.235
23.277
87.591
88.169
66.436
66.552
62.702
62.716
144.279
144.689
125.658
125.719
121.990
121.997
149.691
149.870
47.305
47.584
26.501
26.620
176.911
177.369
83.374
83.640
66.000
66.052
226.031
226.602
141.366
141.547
125.349
125.377
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
Exact
Ref. [4]
70.524
71.371
29.329
29.986
23.399
23.504
98.828
100.126
67.509
67.802
62.806
62.840
151.822
152.844
126.377
126.522
122.065
122.082
181.529
181.816
53.831
54.344
27.258
27.527
205.209
206.026
87.591
88.169
66.436
66.552
249.726
250.861
144.279
144.689
125.658
125.719
(1, 1)
SSCC
1.0
2.0
CSCC
0.5
1.0
2.0
CCCC
0.5
1.0
2.0
(2, 1)
Table 9
q
4
2
Frequency parameters c a 12qx2 =E2 h for orthotropic rectangular plates with M4.
SSCC
b/a
References
1st
2nd
4th
5th
6th
1.0
Exact
Ref. [45]
Exact
Ref. [45]
5.803
5.818
5.113
5.115
8.087
8.090
5.679
5.684
9.339
9.330
6.618
6.612
10.703
10.695
7.813
7.759
10.911
10.879
8.990
8.977
12.806
12.772
9.299
9.287
Exact
Ref. [45]
Exact
Ref. [45]
6.119
6.156
5.149
5.156
8.676
8.683
5.803
5.816
9.437
9.435
6.831
6.826
11.007
11.007
8.087
8.018
11.599
11.555
9.000
8.988
13.189
13.135
9.339
9.330
Exact
Ref. [45]
Exact
Ref. [45]
6.714
6.780
6.073
6.080
8.921
8.953
6.508
6.532
10.297
10.293
7.308
7.320
11.605
11.615
8.401
8.347
11.720
11.686
9.678
9.698
13.663
13.636
9.962
9.941
2.0
CSCC
1.0
2.0
CCCC
1.0
2.0
been proved mathematically (see Appendix A), extensive numerical comparison studies are also presented in this section. We focus
only on the three newly solved cases SSCC, SCCC and CCCC, and the
exact frequencies are compared with the results calculated by FEM
and other approximate methods [4,21,31,45]. Four distinct types of
materials in Table 2 and the thickness h = 0.02 m are used in the
numerical comparison.
In Tables 35, the exact results are compared with the results
calculated using MSC/NASTRAN with the Bending Panel element
whose size is 1 cm 1 cm. In Table 3, the exact results for cases
SSCC, SCCC and CCCC are studied comparatively for M1 (see Table
2) and a b = 1 m 1.2 m. In Table 4 and Table 5, the exact results
for CCCC orthotropic plates with variable length b are compared for
M2 and M3, respectively. It is found that all exact results in Tables
35 agree excellently with the FEM results.
In Tables 68, the results in reference [4], calculated through
Kantorovich method, are used for comparison, and the frequency
parameter cij, corresponding to the mode shape having i and j half
waves in x and y directions, respectively, are calculated for different aspect ratios b/a, different exural rigidity ratios D3/D1 and
D2/D1. It is noteworthy that the exact frequencies in Tables 38
are slightly smaller than the results used for comparisons, since
the frequencies obtained by using the two approximate methods
are the upper bounds.
In Table 9, the results [45] of Green function method are used
for comparison studies which are carried out for SSCC, CSCC and
3rd
Table 10
p
Frequency parameters c xa2 qh=D1 for CCCC orthotropic rectangular plates with
D1 = 1.543 D3, D2 = 4.810 D3.
a/b
Mode
Ref. [31]
Exact
0.5
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
25.425
37.715
47.482
78.015
93.981
115.45
161.95
177.91
25.420
37.303
47.473
93.960
161.85
25.424
37.719
47.481
78.021
93.980
115.47
161.95
177.94
25.104
37.330
46.741
77.300
93.378
114.33
161.51
176.78
1.0
1.5
2.0
Table 11
p
Frequency parameters c xa2 qh=D1 for CCCC orthotropic rectangular plates with
D1 = 4.310 D3, D2 = 0.305 D3.
a/b
Mode
Ref. [31]
Exact
0.5
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
22.780
24.083
24.566
32.007
28.871
49.230
36.620
73.344
22.723
23.774
24.488
31.210
28.783
48.243
36.337
22.780
24.089
24.564
32.023
28.869
49.354
36.618
73.353
22.757
24.009
24.358
31.624
28.289
48.825
35.735
72.827
1.0
1.5
2.0
573
Appendix A
a/b
Mode
Ref. [31]
Exact
0.5
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
23.504
27.513
29.981
54.328
45.830
79.423
71.365
100.08
23.448
26.990
29.894
53.318
45.738
71.269
23.503
27.524
29.979
54.337
45.828
79.437
71.362
100.11
23.398
27.258
29.329
53.831
44.898
78.625
70.524
98.828
uv
"
#
uu
2
4
uu
D
D
b
D
3
1
3
b21
a2 ttb41
D2
D2
D2
D2
uv
"
#
uu
2
4
uu
D3
D1
b
D3
b21
b2 ttb41
D2
D2
D2
D2
1.0
1.5
2.0
A1
A2
A3
A4
2 2
1 b2
D1 a 2D3 a
D2 b42
A5
b 0
A6
/x /1 x /2 x
A7
wy w1 y w2 y
A8
where
/1 x A1 cos a1 x B1 sin a1 x;
/2 x C 1 cosh b1 x H1 sinh b1 x
w1 y A2 cos a2 y B2 sin a2 y;
w2 y C 2 cosh b2 y H2 sinh b2 y
A9
A10
By substituting Eqs. (A7) and (A8) into the left side of Eq. (7), one
can obtain
References
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10772014).
A11
A12
[1] Biancolini ME, Brutti C, Reccia L. Approximate solution for free vibrations of
thin orthotropic rectangular plates. J Sound Vib 2005;288:32144.
[2] Rossi RE, Bambill DV, Laura PAA. Vibrations of a rectangular orthotropic plate
with a free edge a comparison of analytical and numerical results. Ocean Eng
1998;25(7):5217.
[3] Chen WQ, Le CF. 3D free vibration analysis of cross-ply laminated plates with
one pair of opposite edges simply supported. Compos Struct 2005;69:7787.
[4] Sakata T, Takahashi K, Bhat RB. Natural frequencies of orthotropic rectangular
plates obtained by iterative reduction of the partial differential equation. J
Sound Vib 1996;189:89101.
[5] Chladni EFF. Die Akustik. Leipzig; 1802.
[6] Lord Rayleigh. Theory of sound, vol. 1. London: Macmillan; 1877 [Reprinted by
Berlin: Springer; 1945].
[7] Ritz W. Uber eine neue methode zur losung gewisser variations probleme der
mathematischen physic. J Reine Angewandte Mathematik 1909;135:161.
[8] Liew KM, Xiang Y, Kitipornchai S. Research on thick plate vibration: a literature
survey. J Sound Vib 1995;180:16376.
[9] Leissa AW. Vibration of Plates (NASA SP-160). Washington, DC: Government
Printing Ofce; 1969.
[10] Leissa AW. Recent research in plate vibrations, 19731976: classical theory.
Shock Vib Digest 1977;9(10):1324.
[11] Leissa AW. Recent research in plate vibrations, 19731976: complicating
effects. Shock Vib Digest 1978;10(12):2135.
574
[12] Leissa AW. Plate vibration research, 19761980: complicating effects. Shock
Vib Digest 1981;13(10):1936.
[13] Leissa AW. Recent studies in plate vibration, 19811985: complicating effects.
Shock Vib Digest 1987;19(3):1024.
[14] Bhaskar K, Kaushik B. Simple and exact series solutions for exure of
orthotropic rectangular plates with any combination of clamped and simply
supported edges. Compos Struct 2004;63:638.
[15] Szilard R. Theory and analysis of plates. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall;
1974.
[16] Lekhnitskii SG. Anisotropic plates. New York: Gordon and Breach; 1968.
[17] Meirovitch L. Elements of vibration analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1986.
[18] Hearmon RFS. The frequency of exural vibration of rectangular orthotropic
plates with clamped or supported edges. J Appl Mech 1959;26:53740.
[19] Bhat RB. Natural frequencies of rectangular plates using characteristic
orthogonal polynomials in the RayleighRitz method. J Sound Vib
1985;102(4):4939.
[20] Dickinson SM, Di Blasio A. On the use of orthogonal polynomials in the
ReyleighRitz method for the study of the exural vibration and buckling of
isotropic and orthotropic rectangular plates. J Sound Vib 1986;108(1):5162.
[21] Marangoni RD, Cook LM, Basavanhally N. Upper and lower bounds to the
natural frequencies of vibration of clamped rectangular orthotropic plates. Int J
Solids Struct 1978;14:61123.
[22] Bazely NW, Fox DW, Stadter JT. Upper and lower bounds for frequencies of
rectangular clamped plates. Applied Physics Laboratory, Technical Memo, TG626. The John Hopkins University, Baltimore; 1965.
[23] Timoshenko SP, Krieger SW. Theory of plates and shells. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill;
1959.
[24] Gorman DJ. Free vibration analysis of rectangular plates. New York: Elsevier,
North Holland; 1982.
[25] Gorman DJ. Accurate free vibration analysis of clamped orthotropic plates by
the method of superposition. J Sound Vib 1990;140(3):391411.
[26] Gorman DJ. Accurate free vibration analysis of the completely free orthotropic
rectangular plate by the method of superposition. J Sound Vib
1993;165(3):40920.
[27] Gorman DJ, Wei Ding. Accurate free vibration analysis of completely free
symmetric cross-ply rectangular laminated plates. Compos Struct
2003;60:35965.
[28] Gorman DJ. Free vibration analysis of point supported orthotropic plates. J Eng
Mech 1994;120(1):5874.
[29] Gorman DJ, Wei Ding. Accurate free vibration analysis of laminated symmetric
cross-ply rectangular plates by the superposition-Galerkiin method. Compos
Struct 1995;31:12936.
[30] Gorman DJ. Vibration analysis of plates by the superposition
method. Singapore: World Scientic; 1999.
[31] Yu SD, Cleghorn WL. Generic free vibration of orthotropic rectangular plates
with clamped and simply supported edges. J Sound Vib 1993;163(3):43950.
[32] Brunelle EJ, Oyibo GA. Generic buckling curves for specially orthotropic
rectangular plates. Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut J 1983;21:11506.