Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • CivPro Personal Jurisdiction Flow Chart

    Transféré par

    William Stroud
    202 vues3 pages
    This document discusses the legal standards for determining whether a state court has jurisdiction over a defendant. It outlines the evolution of the minimum contacts test established by International Shoe, which built upon earlier rulings allowing states jurisdiction over defendants with presence or property within the state. For a state to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant not present in the forum state, the defendant must have minimum contacts with the state and jurisdiction must be fair and reasonable.

    Description originale:

    Civil Procedure Personal Jurisdiction

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formats disponibles

    PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    This document discusses the legal standards for determining whether a state court has jurisdiction over a defendant. It outlines the evolution of the minimum contacts test established by International Shoe, which built upon earlier rulings allowing states jurisdiction over defendants with presence or property within the state. For a state to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant not present in the forum state, the defendant must have minimum contacts with the state and jurisdiction must be fair and reasonable.

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    202 vues3 pages

    CivPro Personal Jurisdiction Flow Chart

    Transféré par

    William Stroud
    This document discusses the legal standards for determining whether a state court has jurisdiction over a defendant. It outlines the evolution of the minimum contacts test established by International Shoe, which built upon earlier rulings allowing states jurisdiction over defendants with presence or property within the state. For a state to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant not present in the forum state, the defendant must have minimum contacts with the state and jurisdiction must be fair and reasonable.

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 3

    This model is too constrainingallows

    states
    to have jurisdiction over too many elements...
    ...so minimum contacts builds off of this..





    (Hess)

    (Kane v. NJ)

    (& deemed)

    (Pennoyer)
    (International Shoe)

    (Real or Personal)
    (c/a arose in forum state)

    (c/a did not arise in


    forum state)

    FAIR AND REASONABLE

    2 Purposes MUST Be Served

    AND
    (WW VW)

    (Asahi, Ainsworth,
    McIntyre)

    (Calder v. Jones)

    (not many cases..)

    (c/a did not arise in forum state)

    Activity

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi