Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 81

Learning Objectives

Participants will learn:

Whatt a Value
Wh
V l Stream
St
Map
M is
i and
d what
h t it iis not.
t
Key differences between manufacturing and
office/service VSMs.
Best practices for holding a Value Stream Mapping
activity.
How to define office & service product families.
Step-by-step approach for creating current and future
state maps
maps.
How to create an implementation plan from the future
state VSM.

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Value Stream
Mappings Beginnings

Learning to See,
Mike Rother & John Shook

Administrative & Office


Environments

The Complete Lean Enterprise,


Beau Keyte & Drew Locher

Womacks Five Principles of a


Lean Enterprise
Value
Value stream
Flow
Pull
Perfection
Jim Womack
Womack, Lean Thinking,
Thinking 1996,
1996 2003

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Value Stream Defined


Value Stream: All of the activities, required to
fulfill a customer request from order to delivery
(and beyond to cash received).
Value Stream
Process

Process

Process

Custom er

Customer
Request

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Customer
Receipt

The Work We Do:


Degrees of Granularity
Rooftop
p
View
(Strategic)

Process

In the
Weeds
((Tactical))

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Step

Step

Value
Stream

Value Stream
Map

Process

Process

Step

Metrics-Based
Process Map

Stra
ategic

Improvement Roles
Who?

Accountability

Tool

Leadership

What
What has to happen
happen

Value Stream
Mapping

How
How it will happen

Kaizen Events
Events,
Just-do-its,
and Projects

Tactic
cal

Middle
Management
Workforce

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Why Value Stream Mapping?


To set strategy before diving into
t ti
tactics.

The future state VSM is a macro


level blueprint for change; road map

Enables us to SEE the process.


Promotes ssystems
stems thinking /
seeing the whole

Helps us avoid sub


sub-optimizing
optimizing

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

VSM Goal: System Efficiency

System Efficiency =
Optimal Value Stream
Performance

Individual Efficiency =
Sub-optimization

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Types of Value Streams


Product Value Streams
Support Value Streams
Value Stream Segments

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

10

Types of Value Streams


Product Value Streams

Goods wide range


g of manufactured p
products
Services
Healthcare Emergency department patient flow, surgical patient flow,
outpatient testing
Financial Services credit application process, mortgage process,
equipment leasing process
Education college application to arrival
Repair and maintenance wind blade repair
repair, oil field maintenance
maintenance,
refrigeration system service and repair
Energy Nuclear energy production, Oil production
Government Property tax assessment and processing
Law enforcement undercover operations, background check process
Military radar system development, troop deployment
Non-Profit services Donation processing, disaster aid process
Etc.

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

11

Types of Value Streams


(continued)
Value Stream Segments

Order fulfillment
Product development
New account set-up
Laboratory services
Imaging services

Support Value Streams

Recruiting, hiring and onboarding process


Revenue cycle
Information Technology request fulfillment
Purchasing
Accounts payable
Physician credentialing

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

12

Why Value Stream Mapping?


(continued)

Shows the linkage between


i f
information
ti and
d material
t i l flflow.
Makes the disconnects and
obstacles
b t l tto flflow visible
i ibl att a
macro level
M t i b
Metrics-based
dd
decision
i i making:
ki
What are you going to do to
affect the numbers?

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

13

Key Metrics: Time


Process time (PT)

The time
Th
ti
it takes
t k to
t actually
t ll perform
f
the
th work,
k if one is
i
able to work on it uninterrupted
Includes task-specific
task specific doing, talking, and thinking
aka touch time, work time, cycle time

Lead time (LT)


( )

The elapsed time from the time work is made available


until its completed and passed on to the next person or
d
department
t
t in
i the
th chain
h i
aka throughput time, turnaround time, elapsed time
Includes Process Time
Time, not merely waiting time
time.

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

14

Lead Time vs. Process Time


Scenario 1
Lead Time

Process Time

Work
Received

Work passed
to next step

LT = PT + Waiting
g / Delays
y
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

15

Lead Time vs. Process Time


Scenario 2

Lead Time

Process Time
Work passed
to next step

Work
Received

LT = PT + Waiting
g / Delays
y
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

16

Summary Metrics: Time


Activity Ratio (expressed as a percentage)

The percentage of time anything is being done


to the work passing through the system
(whether value-adding
value adding or non
non-value-adding)
value adding)
%Act = (PT LT) 100
100 %Activity = % Time Work is Idle
Common finding = 1-10%
Could also calculate %VA Activity to show how
little time is spent on value-adding activities.

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

17

Key Metrics: Quality


%Complete and Accurate (%C&A)

The percentage of input thats deemed usable as is


by the person doing the work
% of incoming work where the downstream customer
can perform task without having to CAC:
Correct information or material that was supplied
Add information that should have been supplied
Clarify information that should have or could have been
clearer

Measured by the immediate downstream customer


and all subsequent downstream customers.
Similar to first pass yield in manufacturing
manufacturing.

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

18

Summary Metrics: Quality


Rolled First Pass Yield (RFPY)

The percent of value stream output that passes


through the process clean, with no hiccups,
no rework required.
required
RFPY = %C&A x %C&A x %C&A
C
Common
fi
finding
di = 0
0-15%
15%
Multiply ALL %C&As, even if parallel processes

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

19

Current State Value Stream Map


Purchasing Non-repetitive purchases less than $5,000
Inititate Req.

Originator
31
PT = 10 mins.
C&A = 10%
Supplies

Hard Copy

Form File

File Maker

Quicken

Vendor
Website

Excel

ERP

Data Entry

Review
Budget

Review Req.

Finance
PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 60%

0.25 days

4 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 95%

0.5 days
5 mins.

20 Reqs

Review
Requisition

Review 5
Requisition

40 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
C&A = 90%

8 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 100%

1 days
5 mins.

8 hrs.

10 Reqs

PT = 10 mins.
i
C&A = 95%

4 hrs.

PT = 15 mins.
i
C&A = 98%

0.5 days
10 mins.

Approve in
ERP

24 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 90%

3 days
15 mins.

Submit PO
to Supplier

63 Reqs

Corp Purchasing
Manager
1

Admin Asst

Financial Mgr
1

1 days
5 mins.

Enter
Requisition

Review 6
Requisition

IS Manager
1

5 days
5 mins.

Sys Engineer

Supervisor
2

6
2 hrs.

10
External
Supplier

Corp Purchasing
6
56 hrs.

PT = 15 mins.
C&A = 98%

7 days
5 mins.

80 hrs.

PT = 20 mins.
i

10 days
15 mins.

LT = 28.4 days
PT = 65 mins.
AR = 0.477%
RFPY = 4.2%

Customer Demand:
615 requisitions per y ear

PT = Process Time
LT = Lead Time
C&A = % Complete & Accurate
AR = Activ ity Ratio (PT/LT x 100)
RFPY = Rolled First Pass Y ield

Future State Value Stream Map


Purchasing Non-repetitive purchases less than $5,000
Additional
IT access
Enter Req.
in ERP
Integrate Form
File with File
Maker

Originator
31
PT=30 mins.
C&A = 85%
Supplies
Requisition
Checklist
Vendor
Websites

File Maker

Cross
Training

Approval

Additional
IT access

4 hrs.

6 hrs.

0.75 days
5 mins.

Place
Order

External
Supplier

PT=20 mins.

80 hrs.

PT=20 mins.
C&A = 98%
1 days

5 mins.

Dedicated
Buyers

Corp Purchasing
8 hrs.

PT=5 mins.
C&A = 90%

PT=5 mins.
C&A = 95%

0.5 days

Approve
in ERP
Dept
Dept.
Manager
1

Supervisor
2

Use budget in place


of Quicken

Auto Notify

Standard
Work for
review

Review
Req.

ERP

10 days
20 mins.

LT = 12.3 days
PT = 30 mins.
AR = 0.508%
0 508%

Customer Demand:
615 requistions per year

PT = Process Time
LT = Lead Time
C&A = % Complete & Accurate
AR = Activity Ratio (PT/LT x 100)
RFPY = Rolled First Pass Yield

RFPY = 71%

Purchasing Process
Projected Results

M ti
Metric
Lead Time
Process Time
% Activity
Rolled First
Pass Yield
# Handoffs
# IT Systems
Freed capacity

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Current
St t
State

Projected
F t
Future
State
St t

%
I
Improvement
t

28.4 days
65 mins
0.48%

12.3 days
30 mins
0.51%

56.7%
53 8%
53.8%
6.3%

4.2%

71.0%

1,590%

10
6

5
3

50%
50%

2.1 FTEs

10%

Summary Metrics: Measuring


Productivity Gains

Labor Effort
# FTEs

Total PT (in hrs) X # occurrences/year


Available work hrs/year/employee

Freed
= Current State FTEs Future State FTEs
Capacity
Note: Improvement can be expressed as Freed
Capacity (FTEs), Time, or Labor Expense (or all)
# FTEs = Full Time Equivalents; 2 half-time people = 1 FTE

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

23

What do you do with freed capacity?


Absorb additional work without increasing staff
Reduce payroll through natural attrition
Innovate create new revenue streams
Conduct ongoing continuous improvement activities
Do
D ab
better
tt job
j b with
ith ffewer errors and
d hi
higher
h safety
f t
Talk and work with your customers and suppliers
Mentor staff to create career growth opportunities
Provide additional workforce development; cross-train
Better work/life balance
Slow down & think
Get/stay caught up
Do the things you havent been able to get to
Collaborate with other areas
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

24

Basic Mapping Icons


External
Organization

Push Arrow
Operator / Employee

I
Work-in-Process

Material receipts
& shipments
Go See Scheduling

Process Block
PT= 25 m
C/O 40 m
C/O=
2 Shifts
Takt= 60m

Manual
Information Flow
In-box

Data Block

Hours

Lead Time
Process Time

Minutes

Movement
by
y Truck

Electronic
Information
Flow
Hours
Minutes

Timeline

Hours
Minutes

Minutes

Current State Value Stream Map


Outpatient Imaging Services
Pre-register
Patient

Customer Demand:
15patients perDay
(Takt Time1920seconds)
8 hours per day

Schedule
Appointment

Referring
Physician

Hospital

Lead Time = 24 days

Lead Time = 990 mins.

Cycle Time = 30 mins.


Lead Time = 990 mins.
%C&A
%
C&A = 100 %

Demand = 15 per day

Lead Time = 12 mins.

Cycle Time = 11 mins.


Lead Time = 12 mins.
%C&A
%
C&A = 98 %

% C&A = 65 %

CT=Cycle Time
LT=Lead Time
%C&A=% Complete & Accurate

Symposium

E Pay

Excel

ADS

Internet

Meditech

Fax Order
Solutions

Waiting Room
M
Management
t
System

PACS

Auto Fax 50%


Us Mail 25%
MD Mailbox 25%
Rework Loop
via Fax 25% of
the time

Check-in
Patient
(Admitting)

Prep
Patient
(Tech)

Check-in
Patient
(Imaging)

Complete
Exam
(Tech)

Transmit
Images
(Tech)

Read/Dictate
Exam
(Radiologist)

Transcribe
Report
(MDI)

Review
Draft/Sign
(Radiologist)

Print
Reports
(Imaging)

Send
Reports
(Imaging)

5 mins.
5

5 mins
mins.

Cycle Time = 2 mins.


% C&A = 90 %
0.0833 hrs.

Cycle Time = 1 mins.


% C&A = 98 %

0.0833 hrs.
2 mins.

45 mins.

0.75 hrs.
1 mins.

30 mins.

Cycle Time = 10 mins.


% C&A = 100 %

0.5 hrs.
10 mins.

5 mins.

Cycle Time = 15 mins.


% C&A = 90 %

0.0833 hrs.
15 mins.

248 mins.

Cycle Time = 3 mins.


% C&A = 100 %

10

4.13 hrs.
3 mins.

365 mins.

Cycle Time = 15 mins.


% C&A = 95 %

11

6.08 hrs.
15 mins.

960 mins.

Cycle Time = 5 mins.


% C&A = 75 %

12

16 hrs.
5 mins.

110 mins.

Cycle Time = 1 mins.


% C&A = 95 %

1.83 hrs.
1 mins.

13

120 mins.

Cycle Time = 1 mins.


% C&A = 99 %

2 hrs.
1 mins.

14

Cycle Time = 3 mins.


% C&A = 90 %

LT = 32.5 hrs.
3 mins.

CT = 56 mins.
CT/LT Ratio = 2.87%
Rolled First Pass
yield = 29%

VSM Champion: Paul Scanner


Created: July 17, 2007

Future State Value Stream Map


Outpatient Imaging Services
Standard
Work

Work
Balance

Customer Demand:
15 patients perDay
(Takt Time1920 seconds)
8 hours per day

Co-locate
Schedule appt
Pre-register

Referring
Physician

Hospital

Demand = 15 per day

Lead Time = 15 days

Lead Time = 45 mins.

Cycle Time = 11 mins.


Lead Time = 45 mins
mins.
% C&A = 98 %

% C&A = 85 %

Risk
Reduction
(Joint
Commision)

Symposium

E Pay

Excel

Internet

Waiting
a g Room
oo
Management
System

Standard
Work

35 mins.

Cycle Time = 1 mins.


% C&A = 98 %
0.0833 hrs.

Complete
Exam
(Tech)

20 mins.

Cycle Time = 10 mins.


% C&A = 100 %

0.583 hrs.
1 mins.

5 mins.

Auto Fax 80%


Us Mail 15%
MD Mailbox 5%

PACS

5S

120 mins.

Batch
Reductions
R
d ti

Review
Draft/Sign
(Radiologist)
420 mins.

Cycle Time = 15 mins.


% C&A = 95 %

2 hrs.
2 mins.

Continuous
Flow

Print
Reports
(Imaging)

2 mins.

Cycle Time = 1 mins.


% C&A = 95 %

7 hrs.
15 mins.

Rework Loop
via Fax 10% of
the time

Voice
Recognition

Read/Dictate
Exam
(Radiologist)

Cycle Time = 2 mins.


% C&A = 100 %

0.0833 hrs.
10 mins.

Visual
Workplace

Transmit
Images
(Tech)

Cycle Time = 10 mins.


% C&A = 90 %

0.333 hrs.
10 mins.

Work
Balancing
B
l i

Set-up
Reduction

Prep
Patient
(Tech)

Check-in
Patient
(Imaging)

Fax Order
Solutions

Value Stream
Alignment

Pull System
(Supplies
Kanban)

Remove
Check in
and Reduce
System Access

5 mins.

Meditech

CT=Cycle Time
LT=Lead Time
%C&A=% Complete & Accurate

30 mins.

Cycle Time = 1 mins.


% C&A = 99 %

0.0333 hrs.
1 mins.

10

Send
Reports
(Imaging)

0.5 hrs.
1 mins.

11

Cycle Time = 3 mins.


% C&A = 90 %

LT = 11.3 hrs.
3 mins.

CT = 43 mins.
CT/LT Ratio = 6.32%
Rolled First Pass
yield = 40%

VSM Champion: Paul Scanner


Created: July 18, 2007

Outpatient Imaging
Projected Results
Metric
Lead Time
Process Time
Percent Activity
Rolled First
Pass Yield
# Macro Steps
Tech turnover
(annual)

Current
State

Projected
%
Future State Improvement

32.5 hrs
56 mins
2.9%

11.3 hrs
43 mins
6.3%

65%
23%
117%

29%
%

40%
%

38%
%

14

11

21%

100%

25%

75%

Note:
N
t F
Freed
d capacity
it (PT reductions)
d ti
) allowed
ll
d th
the organization
i ti tto earn
$500,000 additional annual revenue with no additional headcount
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

28

Repea
at

Value Stream Mapping Process


Define
D
fi
Product Family

Products (good or services) with


common process steps

Document Current
State

Foundation
F
d ti
(the
(th basis)
b i ) for
f the
th
future state; 70-80% accurate is
acceptable (directionally correct)

Design Future
State

Create flow by eliminating waste


it is now obvious from your
current state map); typically 3-6
months out

Create
Implementation Plan

Implement!

3 Day
Event

Include accountability and


ti f
timeframes
for
f completion
l ti

Th goall off mapping!


The
i !

Scoping: One VSM per Product Family


Group Product Families by similar downstream processes, steps or equipment.
Process Steps & Equipment

Products

Step A

Step B

Step C

Product
ABC

Product
XYZ

Product
AWR

50

73
2

5
15

12

X
X

Product
SUB

Product
IDR

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Step F

Product
ACC

Vol.

Step E

Product
IBM

Step D

X
X

X
X

30

Narrowing the Scope:


Selected Specific Conditions
Non Exempt
Non-Exempt
Staff
Replacements
Exempt
Staff

Hiring
Process
New
Positions

Non-Exempt
Staff
Exempt
Staff

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

31

Narrowing the Scope:


Selected Specific Conditions
Units
Domestic

C
Consumables
bl
Warranty
Service Parts

Order
Fulfillment
Process

NonWarranty

Units
I t
International
ti
l

C
Consumables
bl
Warranty
Service Parts

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

NonNon
Warranty
32

Repea
at

Value Stream Mapping Process


Define
D
fi
Product Family

Products (good or services) with


common process steps

Document Current
State

Foundation
F
d ti
(the
(th basis)
b i ) for
f the
th
future state; 70-80% accurate is
acceptable (directionally correct)

Design Future
State

Create flow by eliminating waste


it is now obvious from your
current state map); typically 3-6
months out

Create
Implementation Plan

Implement!

3 Day
Event

Include accountability and


ti f
timeframes
for
f completion
l ti

Th goall off mapping!


The
i !

Value Stream Mapping Activity


3-day activity; three deliverables

Day
y 1 Document and analyze
y the current state
Go to the Gemba!

Day 2 Design the future state (3-6 months out)


Day 3 Create the implementation plan

Sequestered team composed primarily of those who can


authorize change

Typically manager and above


The team goes to the gemba to obtain the metrics from the
frontlines doing the work.

Leadership learning and development is a powerful side


benefit.
Key
K success factor
f t - interim
i t i b
briefings
i fi
tto communicate
i t and
d
achieve consensus.
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

34

Interim Briefings
Day 1 Heres what weve learned.

Establishes a mental framework for embracing


improvements; sells the need for improvement.

Day 2 Heres what we plan to do.

Does anyone
y
object?
j
If so, why?
y
Challenge policies and paradigms

Day 3 Heres
Here s how we
were
re going to execute.
execute

Priorities, approach, timeframes, accountability


Obtain full commitment right then and there.
there

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

35

Value Stream Mapping

Planning Your Activity:


A well-developed
ll d
l
d charter
h t aids
id in
i
communication, consensus
building and planning

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

36

Value Stream Mapping Charter


Event Scope

Leadership / Coordination
Executive
VP or C-level
Sponsor

Value Stream Engineering design, ED patient flow , Credit processing, etc.


Specific What circumstances you're including and
Conditions excluding?

Event Date(s)

Value Stream If needed - often Director or


Champion Manager level

Customer Demand How many times is this done per wk, mo, or yr.?

Boundaries &
What is the team NOT authorized to change?
Limitations

The person arranging logistics


Coordinator (reserving the room, ordering food,
sending meeting notices, etc.)

FS Implementation
Typically 90-120 days
Timeframe

Event Drivers

Location Need ample wall space


Meals Always a nice touch; keeps
g
Provided? the team from wandering.

Team Lead Not always needed

process block
Last Step Task on last p

3 days typically; sequential is


best

Start/End
6 hrs minimum; 7 or 8 is best
Times

Facilitator Skilled person leading the activity

Trigger What need does the value stream address?


First Step Task on first process block

Interim Aid in consensus building and


Briefing(s) organizational learning.
Briefing List required attendees; others
Attendees are optional

Mapping Team

Wh are you doing


d i thi
this?
?
1 Why

Function

1 Leadership-heavy

Schedule

Name

Contact Information

Goals & Measureable Objectives


j

1 Aim for objectives w/ measurable targets (from X to X).

10

Planned Deliverables

On Call Support
On-Call

1 Current state VSM

Function

2 Future state VSM

1 SMEs that may not be needed full time

3 Implementation Plan

Name

Contact Information

Potential Obstacles
1 To the team's success with the mapping activity.

Approvals
Executive Sponsor

Value Stream Champion

Facilitator

2
3
4

Signature:
Date:

Signature:
Date:

Signature:
Date:

37

Value Stream Mapping Facilitator


Range of Necessary Traits
Skills / Knowledge

Lean
ea philosophy
p osop y
Improvement tools
Project & time management
Mediation; consensus
b ildi
building
People effectiveness from
front line workers to execs

Authority / Respect

Recognized change agent /


influence leader
Trustworthy
y
Comfortable removing
obstacles & reaching out to
senior leadership

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Personality / Energy

Naturally
atu a y cu
curious
ous
Challenging, yet supportive
Positive, upbeat, energetic
Pushy without irritating
Thinks fast on ones feet

Objectivity / Fairness

No attachment to the work


b i iimproved
being
d

38

Repea
at

Value Stream Mapping Process


Define
D
fi
Product Family

Products (good or services) with


common process steps

Document Current
State

Foundation
F
d ti
(the
(th basis)
b i ) for
f the
th
future state; 70-80% accurate is
acceptable (directionally correct)

Design Future
State

Create flow by eliminating waste


it is now obvious from your
current state map); typically 3-6
months out

Create
Implementation Plan

Implement!

3 Day
Event

Include accountability and


ti f
timeframes
for
f completion
l ti

Th goall off mapping!


The
i !

The timeline is the most important of the


three defining characteristics of a
VSM:
1) information flow
2) product flow
3) timeline
If your map doesnt include a timeline, it
your map
p has swim
is not a VSM. If y
lanes, its not a VSM.
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

40

Order Initiation
Current State Map
Demand = XXXX
May 8, 2008
Robert Parker

Infformation
n Flow

Typical VSM Components Manufacturing


g
SUPPLIER

Timeline

Prroduct Flo
ow

Production
Control

Process 1

Process 2

Hours

Hours
Minutes

Process 3

Hours
Minutes

CUSTOMER

Hours
Minutes

Process 4

LT
Minutes PT

Prroduct Flo
ow

Time
eline

Infformation
n Flow

Typical VSM Components Office / Service

ABC Value Stream


Current State Map
Demand = XXXX/yr
Date
Key Contact

CUSTOMER

I.T.

Process 1

Process 2

Hours
Minutes

I.T.

I.T.

Process 3

Hours
Minutes

Process 4

Hours
Minutes

LT
Minutes

PT

Concurrent Work / Parallel Flows


Process

Process

LT = 8 hrs

Process

Process

Process

LT = 4 hrs

Bring longest lead time to the timeline,


unless its a dead end step.

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

43

Common Differences - Manufacturing vs. Office VSMs


Manufacturing

Office

Upper right

Center

Upper left

None

The
The thing
thing we
were
re
following

Raw material
material, subsub
assemblies, finished goods

Paper, verbal
Paper
verbal, and
electronic Information

Information Flow

More structured /
y
formalized I.T. systems

Multiple I.T. systems and


work-arounds

Multiple points across VSM

Work not scheduled

Y
Yes

S
Sometimes
ti

Inventory triangle

In-bin (if preferred)

Fi t Pass
First
P
Yield
Yi ld (FPY)

Percent Complete &


Accurate (%C&A)

Takt Time

Typically can be applied

Only applicable with


dedicated resources

LT determination for
each block

Based on WIP between


process blocks

Based on a single item


passing through

Customer icon
Supplier icon

Schedule notification
Material flow ((via
hollow arrow)
WIP icon
Q lit Metric
Quality
M ti

Preparing to Map
Schedule time to go to the Gemba

Prepare frontlines for questions the team will ask;


establish a safe haven for them to communicate the
true current state (no matter how ugly it is) to high
level leaders they may not usually interface with.
No written procedures allowed creates bias toward
communicating
i ti what
h t should
h ld happen
h
rather
th th
than what
h t
does happen.

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

45

Preparing to Map (continued)


Draw map manually!

11 x 17 paper
Or 36 wide plotter paper and 3 x 6 post-its for
process blocks (my preference)

Only convert to electronic medium if absolutely


necessary (e-distribution,
(e distribution, training, etc.)

iGrafx FlowCharter (my preference)


Systems2Win
y
Excel-based
Minitab
e-VSM
Others

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

46

Step 1
Label your map (draw manually or use 36
wide plotter paper and 3 x 6 post-its)

Value stream name


Current or future state
Customer demand ((volume of work p
per time
period)
Takt time (if relevant)
Date
Facilitators name ((and/or team))

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

47

Takt Time:
The Key to Continuous Flow

T kt time
Takt
ti
=

Takt time =

Available work time


Customer demand
480 minutes/day
45 new accounts

T
Touch
h down
d

= 10.6 mins

OR
Time Available divided by what Kustomer Takes
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

48

Step 2
Identify all blocks in the process (target 5-15 blocks)

Customer icon is placed in upper right or middle


Upper right if supplier exists (supplier is placed in upper left)
Middle position if a separate supplier doesnt exist

Supplier (if relevant) is placed in upper left


Each block (post-it) contains an activity or group of activities that
occurs before a break in the timeline occurs - typically a handoff to
another function/work team
team.
Activity format is verb/noun what happens to what
Include the function who performs the task
Include number of workers who perform the task
Include any obstacles to flow batches, shared/inaccessible
resources, system downtime, etc.
Consider walking the process

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

49

Post-it Conventions
Process
(
(Verb/Noun)
)
Function
# Staff
(if relevant)
Barriers to flow

Step 3
Identify all I.T. systems used in the
process and information flow

For most VSMs, these are placed above the


process blocks
In very complicated VSMs with two rows of
process blocks, I.T. systems can be placed
between the rows, if necessary.
N t any scheduling
Note
h d li th
thatt occurs ((rare iin
current state)
Wh ttells
Who
ll whom
h
tto d
do what?
h t?

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

51

Current State Value Stream Map


Purchasing Non-repetitive purchases less than $5,000
Inititate Req.

Originator
31
PT = 10 mins.
C&A = 10%
Supplies

Hard Copy

Form File

File Maker

Quicken

Vendor
Website

Excel

ERP

Data Entry

Review
Budget

Review Req.

Finance
PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 60%

0.25 days

4 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 95%

0.5 days
5 mins.

20 Reqs

Review
Requisition

Review 5
Requisition

40 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
C&A = 90%

8 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 100%

1 days
5 mins.

8 hrs.

10 Reqs

PT = 10 mins.
i
C&A = 95%

4 hrs.

PT = 15 mins.
i
C&A = 98%

0.5 days
10 mins.

Approve in
ERP

24 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 90%

3 days
15 mins.

Submit PO
to Supplier

63 Reqs

Corp Purchasing
Manager
1

Admin Asst

Financial Mgr
1

1 days
5 mins.

Enter
Requisition

Review 6
Requisition

IS Manager
1

5 days
5 mins.

Sys Engineer

Supervisor
2

6
2 hrs.

10
External
Supplier

Corp Purchasing
6
56 hrs.

PT = 15 mins.
C&A = 98%

7 days
5 mins.

80 hrs.

PT = 20 mins.
i

10 days
15 mins.

LT = 28.4 days
PT = 65 mins.
AR = 0.477%
RFPY = 4.2%

Customer Demand:
615 requisitions per y ear

PT = Process Time
LT = Lead Time
C&A = % Complete & Accurate
AR = Activ ity Ratio (PT/LT x 100)
RFPY = Rolled First Pass Y ield

Step 4
Number the process blocks from left to
right.

If parallel processes exist, use alpha modifiers


e.g. 8A, 8B, etc.

Connect the customer, supplier (if present)


and process blocks

Striped
p
arrow for p
push systems
y
Hollow arrow for material flow

Connect and I.T.


I T systems
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

53

Post-it Conventions
Process Block #
Process
((Verb/Noun))
Function
# Staff
(if relevant)
Barriers to flow

PT (p
(process time))
% Complete &
Accurate

LT (Lead time)

Depicting e-Information Flow


I.T.
Application

Process
Block

I.T.
Application

Arrow pointing to
I T application:
I.T.
li ti
Staff enters data

I.T.
Application

Process
Block

Arrow pointing from


I.T. application:
Staff views data

Process
Block

#1 I.T.
Application

Two-headed arrow:
St ff both
Staff
b th views
i
and
d
enters data

#2 I.T.
Application

Lightning bolt arrow:


Application #1 auto-populates
application #2

55

Current State Value Stream Map


Purchasing Non-repetitive purchases less than $5,000
Inititate Req.

Originator
31
PT = 10 mins.
C&A = 10%
Supplies

Hard Copy

Material
flow

Form File

File Maker

Quicken

Vendor
Website

Excel

ERP

ERP autopopulates
P.O.

Data Entry

Review
Budget

Review Req.

Finance
PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 60%

0.25 days

4 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 95%

0.5 days
5 mins.

20 Reqs

Review
Requisition

Review 5
Requisition

40 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
C&A = 90%

8 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 100%

1 days
5 mins.

8 hrs.

10 Reqs

PT = 10 mins.
i
C&A = 95%

4 hrs.

PT = 15 mins.
i
C&A = 98%

0.5 days
10 mins.

Approve in
ERP

24 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 90%

3 days
15 mins.

Submit PO
to Supplier

63 Reqs

Corp Purchasing
Manager
1

Admin Asst

Financial Mgr
1

1 days
5 mins.

Enter
Requisition

Review 6
Requisition

IS Manager
1

5 days
5 mins.

Sys Engineer

Supervisor
2

6
2 hrs.

10
External
Supplier

Corp Purchasing
6
56 hrs.

PT = 15 mins.
C&A = 98%

7 days
5 mins.

80 hrs.

PT = 20 mins.
i

10 days
15 mins.

LT = 28.4 days
PT = 65 mins.
AR = 0.477%

Push
A
Arrow

RFPY = 4.2%

Customer Demand:
615 requisitions per y ear

PT = Process Time
LT = Lead Time
C&A = % Complete & Accurate
AR = Activ ity Ratio (PT/LT x 100)
RFPY = Rolled First Pass Y ield

Step 5
Add key metrics for all process blocks

Process Time (PT)


Lead Time (LT)
P
Percent
t Complete
C
l t & Accurate
A
t (%C&A)

Add additional obstacles to flow if any are


id tifi d ((e.g. b
identified
batches,
t h
shared
h d resources
system availability/speed, etc.)
Add th
the WIP (work-in-process)
(
ki
) for
f allll
process blocks.
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

57

Post-it Conventions
Process Block #
Process
((Verb/Noun))
Function
# Staff
(if relevant)
Barriers to flow

PT (p
(process time))
% Complete &
Accurate

LT (Lead time)

Three Places WIP Accumulates


Before the process block work not yet begun.
Within the process block work currently being
performed.
After the process block Work thats complete
complete,
but hasnt been passed on
WIP WIP

WIP
Step 1

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Step 2

Step 3

59

Current State Value Stream Map


Purchasing Non-repetitive purchases less than $5,000
Inititate Req.

Originator
31
PT = 10 mins.
C&A = 10%
Supplies

Hard Copy

Form File

File Maker

Quicken

Vendor
Website

Excel

ERP

Data Entry

Review
Budget

Review Req.

Finance
PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 60%

0.25 days

4 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 95%

0.5 days
5 mins.

20 Reqs

Review
Requisition

Review 5
Requisition

40 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
C&A = 90%

8 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 100%

1 days
5 mins.

8 hrs.

10 Reqs

PT = 10 mins.
i
C&A = 95%

4 hrs.

PT = 15 mins.
i
C&A = 98%

0.5 days
10 mins.

Approve in
ERP

24 hrs.

PT = 5 mins.
i
C&A = 90%

3 days
15 mins.

Submit PO
to Supplier

63 Reqs

Corp Purchasing
Manager
1

Admin Asst

Financial Mgr
1

1 days
5 mins.

Enter
Requisition

Review 6
Requisition

IS Manager
1

5 days
5 mins.

Sys Engineer

Supervisor
2

6
2 hrs.

10
External
Supplier

Corp Purchasing
6
56 hrs.

PT = 15 mins.
C&A = 98%

7 days
5 mins.

80 hrs.

PT = 20 mins.
i

10 days
15 mins.

LT = 28.4 days
PT = 65 mins.
AR = 0.477%
RFPY = 4.2%

Customer Demand:
615 requisitions per y ear

WIP

PT = Process Time
LT = Lead Time
C&A = % Complete & Accurate
AR = Activ ity Ratio (PT/LT x 100)
RFPY = Rolled First Pass Y ield

Step 6

Create timeline & calculate summary


metrics
Timeline PT Sum
Timeline LT Sum
Activity
A ti it Ratio
R ti
Rolled First Pass Yield (RFPY)

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

61

How to Treat Lead Time in


Office/Service Environments
Lead Time

Process Time

Process 1

LT

Process 2

LT
PT

PT

Office/Service Lead Time


From the time work is made available until its been completed AND passed on
to the next person/work group/department in the process.
Placed on the peak of the timeline to the left of the process block it refers to.
Represents total throughput time, including process time; not merely wait time.
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

62

Value Stream Mapping


j
Results
Projected
Metric

Current State

Projected
Future State

Projected %
Improvement

Timeline
Ti
li Lead
L d
Time
Timeline
Process Time
Activity Ratio
Rolled
R
ll d First
Fi t
Pass Yield
Total Process
Time (all
( blocks))
Labor Effort
Others, as
relevant
63

Typical Current State Findings


Unnecessary
NVA

Available
to work on

Value Add

Necessary
NVA

Available to
next step

Islands of activity (process times) within long lead times.

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

64

Step 7
Identify all value-adding (VA) and necessary
non-value-adding
l
ddi (N) steps
t

Add VA or N smaller post-it to relevant process


blocks
All unnecessary non-value-adding blocks remain
unlabelled
Enter
Order

Check
Credit

Approve
Order

Customer Rep

Finance

Sales Rep

VA

Value-adding

Necessary
Non-Value-Adding

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Unnecessary
Non-Value-Adding
65

Customer-Defined Value
Value-Adding (VA) - any operation or
activity
ti it your external
t
l customers
t
value
l
and are (or would be) willing to pay for.
N
Non-Value-Adding
V l Addi (NVA) - any operation
ti
or activity that consumes time and/or
resources but does not add value to the
product (good or service) the customer
receives.
receives

Necessary support processes, regulatory


requirements, etc.
Unnecessary everything else - WASTE

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

66

Work Effort as Defined by the


External Customer

Unnecessary N
U
Nonvalue adding
Necessary non-valueadding
Value-adding

Repea
at

Value Stream Mapping Process


Define
D
fi
Product Family

Products (good or services) with


common process steps

Document Current
State

Foundation
F
d ti
(the
(th basis)
b i ) for
f the
th
future state; 70-80% accurate is
acceptable (directionally correct)

Design Future
State

Create flow by eliminating waste


it is now obvious from your
current state map); typically 3-6
months out

Create
Implementation Plan

Implement!

3 Day
Event

Include accountability and


ti f
timeframes
for
f completion
l ti

Th goall off mapping!


The
i !

Designing the Future State Value


Stream

Target All Waste!

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

69

Eight Wastes (Muda)

Overproduction
Inventory
y
Waiting
Over Processing
Over-Processing
Errors

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Motion (people)
Transportation
p
(material/data)

Underutilized
people

70

Future State Design


Goal: Removing
g all obstacles to flow ((the
thing should never stop)

Batches
Rework
WIP / Bottlenecks
Handoffs
Setup / changeover
Physical layout
Motion & transportation

2010 Karen Martin & Associates

71

Eight Questions for


Future State VSM
1. What are the customer requirements? Whats the takt
time?
2. With goods, will we produce to order or to finished
goods inventory?
g
y ((With services, yyoure almost always
y
producing to order.)
3. Where can continuous flow be put in place?
4 Where
4.
Wh
should
h ld pullll systems
t
b
be iimplemented?
l
t d?
5. What is the single point of scheduling?
6 How do we level the load and the mix?
6.
7. What should the management time frame be?
8. What process improvements are necessary to achieve
the future state?
-- Rother & Shook, Learning to See
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Future State Design


Considerations
Error-proof (including
incoming customer
requests)
Standardize the work
Eliminate steps / handoffs
Eliminate waste
Combine steps
Create parallel paths
Alter task sequencing and/or
timing
Eliminate or reduce batches
Level demand
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

Balance work to meet


takt time requirements
Co-locate and crosstrain work teams
Implement pull
Implement visual
management
Organize the workplace
so problems are visible
Reduce
R d
changeover
h
Eliminate motion &
p
transportation
73

Building a Lean Enterprise

Process
Stabilization
Tools

Building a Lean Enterprise

Flow Enabling
Tools

Future State Icons


Withdrawal
Combined Steps
Kanban
Arriving
in Batches
Eliminated Step

Max 8 things

FIFO

First-In
First-Out
(max WIP
defined)

Production
Kanban
Withdrawall
Withd
Kanban
Signal
Kanban

Buffer Stock

OXOX
Kaizen Burst

Supermarket

Leveling,
Mi and/or
Mix
d/
Volume

Kanban
Post

Kanban
Path

Value Stream Mapping


j
Results
Projected
Metric

Current State

Projected
Future State

Projected %
Improvement

Lead Time
Process Time
% Activity
Rolled First
Pass Yield
Labor Effort

77

Repea
at

Value Stream Mapping Process


Define
D
fi
Product Family

Products (good or services) with


common process steps

Document Current
State

Foundation
F
d ti
(the
(th basis)
b i ) for
f the
th
future state; 70-80% accurate is
acceptable (directionally correct)

Design Future
State

Create flow by eliminating waste


it is now obvious from your
current state map); typically 3-6
months out

Create
Implementation Plan

Implement!

3 Day
Event

Include accountability and


ti f
timeframes
for
f completion
l ti

Th goall off mapping!


The
i !

Future State Implementation Plan


Value Stream Outpatient Imaging

Implementation Plan Review Dates


11/1/2007

Executive Sponsor Allen Ward


Value Stream Champion Sally McKinsey

11/21/2007

Value Stream Mapping Facilitator Dave Parks

12/13/2007

Date Created 10/18/2007


Block
#
2

Goal / Objective
Improve quality of referral

Improvement Activity
Implement standard work for referral
process

Type

Owner

KE

Sean O'Ryan

PROJ

Dianne
Prichard

3, 4

Reduce lead time beween schedulingand


Cross-train and colocate work teams
preregistration steps

5, 6

Eliminate the need for two patient checkins

Collect copays in Imaging

KE

Michael
O'Shea

g area
Eliminate bottleneck in waiting

Balance work / level demand

KE

Dianne
Prichard
P
i h d

Eliminate lead time associated with


transcription step

Implement voice recognition technology

PROJ

Sam Parks

10

Eliminate batched reading

Reduce setup required

KE

Sam Parks

Reduce inventory costs, regulatory risk


and storage needs

5S CT supplies area; implement kanban

KE

Michael
O'Shea

12

Reduce delay in report delivery

Implement additional fax ports

PROJ

Martha Allen

12

Reduce delayy in report


p deliveryy

Increase percentage of physicians


receiving
g electronic deliveryy ((rather than
hard copy)

KE

Martha Allen

1/10/2008
Implementation Schedule (weeks)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Approvals
Executive Sponsor

Value Stream Champion

Value Stream Mapping Facilitator

Signature:

Signature:

Signature:

Date:

Date:

Date:

Date
Complete

PACE Prioritization Matrix


Easy

IT
I.T.

15

23

Policy

10

Process

13

20
18 17

14

25

9
16

26
12

22
27

Difficultt

Ease of Implem
E
mentatiion

21

24

19

11
3

High

Anticipated Benefit

Low
80

About Karen Martin


Early career as a scientist; migrated to quality
& operations design in the mid
mid-80
80s
s.
Launched Karen Martin & Associates in 1993,
focusing on operations design and Total Quality
Management.
Management
Began applying white collar lean in 2001.
Co-author of The Kaizen Event Planner:
A hi i R
Achieving
Rapid
id IImprovementt iin Offi
Office,
Service, and Technical Environments; codeveloper of Metrics-Based Process Mapping:
Karen Martin, Principal
An Excel-Based
Excel Based Solution
Solution.
Karen Martin & Associates
University of California, San Diego Lean
Enterprise program instructor.
For
F more information:
i f
ti
www.ksmartin.com
k
ti
2010 Karen Martin & Associates

81

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi