Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Disclosure
Nothing to disclose.
Introduction
Adherence to diabetes clinical practice guidelines
(CPGs) is sub-optimal
In USA: 68% received A1C tests and 66% received eye
examinations in accordance with ADA guidelines
In BC, Canada: 54% of children with T1D receiving < 2
diabetes-related physician visits and A1C tests per year
Introduction
Adherence to CPGs is linked to better outcomes
Glycemic control was better in patients seen 3-4 times
per year vs 1-2 times per year (A1C 8.3% vs 9.1%)
Patients with irregular follow-up had worse glycemic
control compared to those with continuous follow-up
(12.2% vs 10.8%)
Kaufman et al, Pediatrics 1999
Jacobson et al, Pediatrics1997
Objective
To identify factors perceived as facilitators and
barriers to adhering to the Canadian Diabetes
Association CPGs for the treatment of childhood
type 1 diabetes among pediatric health care
providers (HCPs)
Methods
Online survey to pediatric and diabetes HCPs (N=260)
Physicians (pediatric endocrinologists, pediatricians)
Diabetes Educators (nurses, dieticians)
Theoretical Model
Theoretical Domains Framework
Cabana et als Framework of barriers to physician adherence to
CPGs
Results
37%
(95/260)
61%
(71/116)
22.0%
8.5%
19.5%
14.6%
17.1%
Vancouver (PHSA)
18.3%
Results
Role distribution of the Health Care Professionals
(N=90)
Pediatrician
34.4%
Nurse
28.9%
Dietitian
22.2%
Pediatric Endocrinologist
7.8%
Social Worker
Other
Family Doctor
Psychologist
3.3%
2.2%
1.1%
0%
1. Knowledge
Almost all HCPs were aware of and familiar with
the CDA CPGs
%
92
77
N
88
81
2. Attitudes
Most HCPs agreed or strongly agreed with
recommended glycaemic targets
Agreement with the recommended glycemic
targets for each age group
age < 6
(N=85, =4.00 0.7)
2,4%
14,1%
6 age 12
(N=85, =3.99 0.6)
1,2%
16,5%
13 age 18
(N=86, =3.83 1.0)
3,5% 8,1%
1=Strongly disagree
64,7%
18,8%
64,7%
12,8%
2=Disagree
17,6%
53,5%
3=Neither Agree or Disagree
22,1%
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
2. Attitudes
Most HCPs agreed or strongly agreed with
recommended complications screening schedule
Agreement with recommended screening schedule for
complications
hypertension
1,3%
(N=77, =4.00 0.7)
hyperlipidemia
(N=77, =3.95 0.7)
14,3%
2,6%
18,2%
neuropathy
1,3%
(N=77, =3.97 0.6)
16,9%
retinopathy
0,0%
(N=76, =4.03 0.6)
19,7%
nephropathy
0,0%
(N=77, =4.08 0.6)
11,6%
1/2=(Strongly) Disagree
66,2%
18,2%
61,0%
18,2%
64,9%
16,9%
57,9%
22,4%
63,6%
3=Neither Agree or Disagree
22,1%
4=Agree
5=Strongly Agree
Survey Response
(N)
5.4
(5)
3.3
(3)
18.5 (17)
12.0 (11)
Other
19.6 (18)
Survey Responses
13.8
11
2.5
2.5
23.8
19
I do not feel my patients with T1D and their families have the
motivation or support to achieve the screening schedule
13.8
11
15
Other
20
25.0
Why?
71% identify long wait times & lack
of psychosocial services
5. Facilitators
What might enhance adherence to CPGs?
Diabetes clinic template form with reminders on
key aspects of CPGs
28.9%
23.0%
19.6%
22.5%
Conclusions
Almost all pediatric diabetes HCPs in British Columbia
are aware of and agree with the CDA Clinical Practice
Guidelines
Limitations
Survey method and survey response rate lower
(37% vs 63%) than similar survey study in UK
Gosden C et al, Arch Dis Child 2010
Biases
Phenomenon of social desirability
Selection bias
Next Steps
Improved access to mental health services is needed
Future research identifying patient/family perspectives on
facilitators and barriers to adhering to treatment
Innovative approaches to improving adherence
Electronic medical records offering reminders for screening
Models of care shared care, medical home, transition clinics to
improve access to care
Technology Telehealth, SMS text messaging
Acknowledgements
N=69, (=3.880.87)
53,6%
21,7%
17,4%
5,8%
1,4%
1=Never
2=Rarely
3=Sometimes
4=Often
5=Almost Always
Frequency of Visits
N=75
29,3%
26,7%
8,0%
5,3%
1=Four times or
more
2=Three times
3=Two times
4=One time
5=Other
18,9%
11,1%
0,0%
HCP believes
unnecessary
Other
Limited clinic
capacity
Patient
preference
(prefer not to
come more
often)
Shared care
Patient
compliance
Mean
SD
81
3.94
0.91