Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A STUDY OF WARPING OF CURED COMPOSITE PLATE AND UCHANNEL MADE WITH CARBON/EPOXY UNI-DIRECTIONAL PREPREG
ARJUN RADHAKRISHNAN
CID: 00704997
SUBMITTED ON: 16/03/2012
ABSTRACT:
A study of factors influencing distortions of cured laminated Carbon/Epoxy composite plates
and u-channels. Asymmetric, anti-symmetric and symmetric laminate sequences are used to
manufacture the specimens. Comparisons of actual and predicted distortions are reported.
Channels exhibit springing phenomenon and major factors are stacking sequence and
thermoelastic springing. In plates asymmetry and orthotropic thermal expansion coefficients
are the major influences. Understanding the phenomenon is essential to obtain dimensionally
stable composite parts. Applying the predictive capability to obtain naturally curved parts is a
novel application of the phenomenon observed here.
Table
of
Contents
LIST
OF
SYMBOLS
............................................................................................................................................................
3
1.
OBJECTIVES
...................................................................................................................................................................
4
2.
INTRODUCTION
...........................................................................................................................................................
4
3.
MANUFACTURING
METHODS
..................................................................................................................................
5
3.1.
MATERIALS:
.........................................................................................................................................................
5
3.2.
SETUP
AND
MANUFACTURING
.......................................................................................................................
6
4.
EXPERIMENTAL
OBSERVATION
.............................................................................................................................
8
4.1.
SURFACE
APPEARANCE
AND
TEXTURE
......................................................................................................
8
4.2.
BOWING,
TWISTING
AND
SPRINGING
.........................................................................................................
8
4.3.
EDGES
OF
THE
CHANNELS
...............................................................................................................................
9
4.4.
PLATE
CURVATURES
.......................................................................................................................................
10
5.
THEORY
AND
INFERENCES
....................................................................................................................................
13
5.1.
MANUFACTURING
EFFECTS
..........................................................................................................................
13
5.2.
STACKING
SEQUENCE
AND
COEFFICIENT
OF
THERMAL
EXPANSION
.............................................
13
5.3.
THERMOELASTIC
AND
NON-THERMOELASTIC
SPRINGING
...............................................................
14
5.4.
EDGE
EFFECTS
...................................................................................................................................................
14
5.5.
EFFECT
OF
MOLD
GEOMETRY
......................................................................................................................
14
6.
MEASURED
CHANNEL
DISTORTIONS
.................................................................................................................
15
7.
ESTIMATED
CHANNEL
DISTORTIONS
................................................................................................................
17
8.
DISCUSSION
.................................................................................................................................................................
20
8.1.
COMPARISON
PREDICTION
AND
MEASUREMENT
OF
LARGER
RADII
.............................................
20
8.2.
COMPARISON
PREDICTION
AND
MEASUREMENT
OF
SMALLER
RADII
..........................................
21
8.3.
EFFECT
OF
STACKING
SEQUENCE
...............................................................................................................
21
8.4.
EFFECT
OF
CURE
SHRINKAGE
......................................................................................................................
22
8.5.
COMPARISON
OF
PREDICTION
AND
MEASUREMENT
OF
BOWING
IN
ARMS
................................
22
8.6.
TWISTING
AND
INLFUENCE
OF
EDGE
EFFECT
........................................................................................
23
8.7.
OTHER
FACTORS
THAT
INFLUENCE
THE
SPRINGING
PHENEMENON
............................................
24
9.
FURTHER
WORK
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
...................................................................................................
24
REFERENCES
...................................................................................................................................................................
26
APPENDIX
1
.....................................................................................................................................................................
27
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Symbol
Definition
Extensional stiffness
Bending stiffness
Strain
Curvature
1/m
E11
GPa
E22
GPa
12
Poissons ratio
G12
GPa
11
/oC
22
/oC
/oC
/oC
Radius of curvature
Curvature
1/m
Maximum deflection
(degrees)
(degrees)
Change in temperature
m3
11
22
through thickness
Unit
1. OBJECTIVES
Manufacture channels with varying layup, simultaneously plates of similar layups as the
channels. Quantify the deformation in the cured products using measurement of change in
corner angles and arm curvatures. Estimate the curvature of the plates using LAMINATE
ANALYSIS PROGRAM (LAP).
curvatures, using thermal models and classical laminate theory (CLT). Compare the data and
comment, justify the qualitatively and quantitatively the channel warping.
2. INTRODUCTION
Composites are now extensively used to replace other materials as both structural and
non-structural members. As their production increases, the dimensional precision becomes
increasingly important. Composites exhibit orthotropic properties and hence like any other
properties their coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) varies with directions. The forcestrain and moment-curvature equations of a composite laminate is expressed as1:
From these equations it can be logically derived that there is coupling of shear,
extension, bending and twisting for a general case of asymmetric laminate.
When
manufacturing laminates they would contract due to thermal effects from cure to the room
temperature. When this thermal contraction occurs a general laminate due to coupling effects
would come out deformed.
So the main factors influencing the distortion of the finished product would be:
1. Stacking sequence
2. Geometry of the product
3. Orthotropic CTEs
4. Cure shrinkage
There are other factors, which affect the distortions locally like temperature gradients and
bleeder arrangements. Generally for the channel the major deformations are spring back or
forward of the arms and bending of the arms as shown in fig 1. Other minor distortions would
be bowing and twisting.
3. MANUFACTURING METHODS
3.1.
MATERIALS:
Two products were produced, plate and channel. The plate and channel dimensions are
given in fig 2 and 3, respectively. The material used was MTM 44-1 HTS carbon fibre prepreg supplied by Advanced Composites Group and the material properties are listed in table
1. The laminate orientations adopted for each channel are listed in table 2.
Fibre
Carbon
Matrix
Epoxy
E11, (GPa)
129
11 (strain/oC)
1.50 e-06
E22 (GPa)
22 (strain/oC)
3.50 e-05
12
0.31
35
G12 (GPa)
11
0.32 e-04
22
3.3 e-03
through thickness
6.7 e-03
0.024
r
0.299
-0.0069
Mold CTE
23.1 e-06
Sl
Layup
Comments
[90/0/0/0]
Unsymmetrical
[0/0/0/90]
Unsymmetrical
[90/90/0/0]
Anti-symmetric
[90/0/90/0]
Anti-symmetric
[90/0/0/90]
Symmetrical
[0/0/90/90]
Anti-symmetric
[0/90/90/0]
Symmetrical
[90/0/0/0]
Unsymmetrical
No:
4. EXPERIMENTAL OBSERVATION
4.1.
SURFACE
APPEARANCE
AND
TEXTURE
The plates and channels after curing are examined and have exhibited a variety of
distortions. The surface appearance of these specimens both channel and plate seems to have
a trend. They were smooth on the underside as shown in fig 13, which was the side on the
PTFE coating, while the upper surface exhibited a slightly rougher surface. The surface
texture of these specimens varied but still seems to be exhibiting a certain trend. The main
texture observed was wrinkling as shown in fig 12. The observed textures and smoothness of
all the channels and plates have been tabulated in table 3 and 4, respectively.
4.2.
BOWING,
TWISTING
AND
SPRINGING
Except for channel 6 there were no other specimens exhibiting visible bowing along
the length. Bowing of arms is present in all the channels except 5 and 7. Table 3 contains the
observed bowing for each of the channels. Certain channels exhibited a shift of arms in the
longitudinal direction indicative of twisting of the channels. The observations are tabulated in
table 3. All the channels, as shown in fig 8 and 9, except channel 7 exhibited either a spring
forward or backward and the observations are tabulated in table 3.
Table 3 Experimental observations of channels
Channel
No:
1
Surface appearance
Springing
Back
Top
Bottom
Rough with
Smooth
wrinkled
surface
Bowing
(Length
wise)
No
Bowing
(Arms)
All arms
Twisting
Yes
bowing up
texture
2
Forward
Back
Back
Back
Rough
Rough with
Smooth with
No
All arms
wrinkled
bowing
texture
down
Smooth
No
Slight
wrinkled
bowing up
texture
on all arms
Rough with
Smooth
No
Slight
wrinkled
bowing up
texture
on all arms
Rough
Smooth with
No
Yes
Yes
No
Nil
No
Yes
Slight
No
wrinkled
texture
6
Forward
Rough
Smooth with
wrinkled
bowing
texture
down in all
arms
Back
Rough
Smooth
No
Nil
Yes
Back
Rough with
Smooth with
No
All arms
No
wrinkled
wrinkled
texture
texture
bowing up
are also errors due to misplacing of the laminates as shown again in fig 11. There is excess
resin at all the free edges they are brittle and susceptible to chip off as shown in fig 12.
4.4.
PLATE
CURVATURES
The plates, as shown in fig 10, exhibited varying curvatures except for plates 5 and 7. Two
stable curvatures are observed for plates 3, 4 and 6. Top surface is rough and bottom surface
is smooth for all the plates. Observations of the 8 plates are summarized in table 4.
Table 4 Experimental observations for plate
Plate
No:
Curvature
Surface appearance
Top
Bottom
Positive in y direction
Rough
Smooth
Positive in x direction
Rough
Smooth
Rough
Smooth
Rough
Smooth
direction
4
Nil
Rough
Smooth
Rough
Smooth
direction
7
Nil
Rough
Smooth
Negative in y direction
Rough
Smooth
10
11
12
13
- Spring back
! < !
- Spring forward
There could also be a spring effect at the corners due to cure shrinkage especially in
thermoset matrices like epoxy, termed as non-thermoelastic effect. When curing, thermoset
polymers start cross-linking resulting an effective shrinkage. This shrinkage rate () differs
with directions, in this case radially and tangentially. Similar, to thermal effects the cure
effects also share the same relations.
! > !
- Spring back
! < !
- Spring forward
Experiments done on the effects of cure and thermal springing suggest that
these effects would be prominent with increasing thickness to upto a spring back of almost 1o.
The corner radius is suggested to have a negligible effect on the thermoelastic springing3. The
volume fraction could also slightly influence both thermoelastic and non-thermoelastic spring
forward to about 0.08o spring forward.
5.4.
EDGE
EFFECTS
The slight twisting observed longitudinally in the channels does not seem to adhere to
any trend and could be due to the improper cutting of the lamina resulting in non-uniform
edges. It could also be due to paper edge effect at the edges usually observed when placing
lamina one over the other to produce a curved part.
5.5.
EFFECT
OF
MOLD
GEOMETRY
AND
MATERIAL
A female mould would have reduced the spring back as noticed by Oakeshott5. The
current geometry being male mould would not restrain spring back but in a specimen
manufactured using female mould there would in-built stresses that would affect the design of
14
composite parts. Aluminum has a CTE that is greater than that of the laminate as can be seen
by comparing property from table 1 and 6. Hence during the curing stage the mold would be
subjecting the laminate to undue stresses, resulting in residual stresses within the material.
These stresses could result in an additional springing angle, possibly a spring back.
The cross-section of the channels is drawn onto a grid sheet paper with 0.5 HB pencil.
The transition points from flat to curved part is marked by comparing it with mold and then
tracing it into the drawing directly. The gridded sheet was scanned and imported into
SEASHORE, simple co-ordinate system based image software. The grid is measured
using the software and compared with the actual grid size. The ratio of digital to actual size
gives the scaling ratio and is calculated to be 2.
15
For sections 1, 3 and 5 as shown in the fig the and l are measured. The radius of
curvature and curvature are obtained using eqn 2 and 3. This is applied both for channel and
plates.
Equation 1
=
2
+ ( )!
Equation 2
2
=
+ !
Equation 3
=1
The included angles for section are measured using similar methods to other sections.
As shown in fig 15 and using eqn 2 the radius of curvature is measured. Now using eqn 4 the
included angle is measured.
In an ideal channel the sections 1, 3 and 5 would have zero curvature and the included
angle for sections 2 and 4 would be 90o based on the geometry. Therefore the distortions can
be quantified using eqn 3 and 4. The measured distortions for the channels are tabulated in
table 5.
Equation 4
= 2 !! (
/2
Channel
SMALL
LARGE
No:
yy
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
9.4
22.25
-13.4
-21.23
-18.60
-9.3
-19.99
15.44
25.79
54.74
16.26
5.33
-9.30
-15.01
-2.55
2.27
1.397
1.26
3.37
-0.39
-2.37
6.41
13.24
16.48
1.13
2.79
11.7
25.59
-13.32
-21.23
-18.60
16
!!!"#$% = ! ! T
17
18
Laminate Analysis Program (LAP) by anaglyph is used to predict the effects of asymmetry.
The material property, laminate orientation, cure temperature and room temperature are fed to
the system as inputs, as shown in fig 16. The program provides the complete laminate
properties as shown. The thermal effect of the stacking sequence is obtained by inputting the
temperatures as shown in fig 17. To obtain the curvature in y-axis, the x-axis curvature is
constraint to zero as shown in fig 17. The curvature obtained from LAP is used in eqn 6 to
obtain the change in included angle due to asymmetry. The total change in induced angle is
calculated using eqn 7. The estimated curvatures and included angles are tabulated in table 6.
Hence there are two problems encountered in LAP:
1. Obtaining the effect of cool down from cure on laminate
2. Restricting the double curvature
Equation 6
!"#$% = [1 + (!"# !! )]
Equation 7
!!!"#$% = ! ! V
Table 6 Estimated channel distortions
Channel
yy
No:
SMALL
LARGE
yy
Thermal
CLT
Total
Thermal
CLT
Total
-13.48
0.23
9.84
10.07
-0.23
16.98
17.21
2.16E-05
13.48
0.23
-9.84
-9.61
-0.23
-16.99
-16.76
2.16E-05
-7.1673
0.08
5.23
5.31
-0.08
9.03
9.11
9.62E-06
-1.739
0.01
1.27
1.28
-0.01
2.20
2.21
4.60E-06
0.01
0.00
0.01
-0.01
0.00
0.01
3.97E-06
7.163
0.08
-5.23
-5.15
-0.08
-9.03
-8.95
9.60E-06
0.01
0.00
0.01
-0.01
0.00
0.01
3.97E-06
-13.48
0.23
9.84
10.07
-0.23
17.02
17.25
2.16E-05
0.2o
~ 0.0009 m
19
8. DISCUSSION
8.1.
COMPARISON
PREDICTION
AND
MEASUREMENT
OF
LARGER
RADII
The corner with larger radius, i.e. section 2, exhibits a variation in estimated and
predicted values as shown in fig. 18 Except for channel 3, 4 and 6 the estimated value is
lesser than the predicted. This seems to be valid as the prediction model does not account for
effects like cure shrinkage and non-uniform curing in the channel. At the same time there
could be error induced by the measurement technique adopted. In channels 3, 4 and 6 the
prediction is more than the measured included angle. Besides, measurement errors it could
also possibly be an over-estimation in the prediction as these laminated where anti-symmetric
and possessed double curvatures. Curvature in x-axis was constrained to obtain a single
curvature possibly leading to an increased estimation of the included angle. In symmetric
laminates only thermoelastic predictions are included as there is no effect due to coupling.
The angle measured for both channels 5 and 7 with symmetric layup is close to 3o. At the
corners due to excess resin bleeding on the surface there could be a volume fraction gradient,
which in turn would affect the material properties. The excess in measured angle hence would
include cure effects and volume fraction effect of upto 0.2o. Hence the large variation can
only be attributed to lack of accuracy in measurement and improper layup.
20
21
22
23
24
FEM analysis of the channel would have yielded slightly better predictions but its would
require extensive modeling to capture all the major effects simultaneously.
The accuracy of measurement could have been improved by using a Coordinate
measurement machine (CCM) to pinpoint the exact transition points. The handling of the
composites is of concern as repeatedly subjecting it to mishandling leads to damage. This is
important as the brittle edges could chip off leaving measurements that follow erroneous.
A wide variety of laminate sequences where adopted, but an understanding of
increasing the number of 90o plies would have been achieved if a laminate sequence of
[903/0] or [0/903] was tested.
Another exercise to improve the understanding would be to predict the sequence of
laminate required to produce a prescribed curvature. This concept has been utilized in several
applications by imbibing asymmetry to produce the curvature1.
25
REFERENCES
(1) Jones R. Mechanics of composite materials.
(2) Holmberg JA. An approximate analysis of springback phenemenon. SICOMP. Report number:
95-006; 1995.
(3) Patterson JM, Springer GS. Experimental observations of the spring-back phenomenon. ; 1991.
(4) Fernlund G. Experimental and numerical study of the effect of cure cycle, tool surface,
geometry, and lay-up on the dimensional fidelity of autoclave-processed composite
parts. Composites.Part A, Applied science and manufacturing 2002;33(3): pp. 341.
(5) Oakeshott JL, Lemoine D. Experimental study of spring forward in cured laminated U-channels
made from unidirectionally reinforced carbon fiber-epoxy prepregs. PLAST RUB COMPOS
PRO 1998;27: pp. 190.
(6) Arao, Y. Effect of moisture absorption on dimensional stability in carbon/epoxy composites,
2007.
(7) Springer GS editor. Environmental effects on composite materials. : Technomic; 1981.
(8) Advance composites datasheet, MTM 44-1 Prepreg.
26
APPENDIX 1
ABD Matrix for all the laminate sequences
90/0/0/0
0/0/0/90
90/90/0/0
90/0/90/0
27
90/0/0/90
0/0/90/90
0/90/90/0
90/0/0/0
28