VDA Volume 16 Englisch Pictures

16
Page
8
Source Legend:
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Type of characteristic
No. 1:
Offset
No. 2:
Burn marks
No. 3:
Dents
Page
Appendix to VDA Volume 16

2nd revised edition, 2008
Type of characteristic
No. 28: Various polishing defects
No. 28a: Stippling

No. 28b: Dull areas
No. 4a: Bubbles
No. 28c: Holograms
No. 4b: Pitting
No. 28d: Polishing flecks
No. 5:
Impression marks
No. 6:
Anodising splits
No. 30: Polishing streaks
No. 7:
Colour misting
No. 31: Pores
No. 8:
Colour differences
No. 32: Indications of seams / seam-welds
No. 9:
Swollen edges
10
11
No. 29: Polishing "fish" / "comet tails"
No. 33: Scour marks
No. 10: Flecks
No. 34: Step marks (linear traces of rolling)
No. 11: Flash on tool split line
No. 35: Striations
No. 12: Differences in sheen
No. 36: Graininess
No. 13: Flash / burrs
12
No. 37: Corrugations
No. 14: Grittiness
No. 38a: Cloudiness/ fogging/ streaks
No. 15: Hairline splits
No. 38b: Streaks caused by moisture / air
No. 16: Contact / gripping points
No. 39: Differences in coating thicknesses
No. 17: Scratches; grooves
13
No. 40: Sink marks
No. 18: Paint runs
No. 41: Converging flow marks
No. 19: Lens-like paint marks
No. 42: Sucker marks
No. 20: Thin coating areas
No. 43: Seam welds
No. 21: Macro-splits
14
No. 44: Moisture inclusions
No. 22: Pin-holes
No. 45: Holes
No. 23: Nickel patches
No. 46: Alignment gap / offset
No. 24: "Orange-peel" effect
No. 47: Patch marks
No. 25: Oxide lines
15
No. 26: Pimpling / inclusions
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
7) Plasma process (evaporation, sputter, CVD, PVD)

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing
10) Assembly / packaging / handling
11) Incoming material
12) Plastic processing
No. 27: Pigmentation problems
No. 48: Jagged knife edges

No. 49: Differences in structure and texture
13) Refined wood surfaces

14) Application technology (gluing insert foils, embossing decorative foils)
15) Metal die-casting
16) Mechanical processing (grinding, polishing, deburring, drilling, milling, insertion, etc.)
17) Laser lettering
No. 50: Compressed folds
16
No. 51: Paint residues

No. 52: Burn marks
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom

VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
Nur zur internen Verwendung fr TRW Automotive GmbH bestimmt.
Page 1 of 17
16

No. 1: Offset
Data:
Definition: Misalignment where parts are structured (for example,
by vulcanisation or over-moulding).
Process allocation: 5, 8, 12, 13, 15
Examples of permissible characteristic features:
Zone A: Visible and detectable by touch +/- 0.3 mm
Zone B: +/- 0.7 mm
No. 2: Burn marks

Data:
Definition: Matt / crumbly appearance to surface, caused by
dendritic separation in the limit current area (referred
to as "buds" when they are large).
Process allocation: 1, 6
Zone A: Refer to MTP sample(s)
Zone B: Refer to MTP sample(s)
No. 3: Dents
Data:
Definition: Flat bubble-like depressions, caused by high pressure.
Process allocation: 6, 8 -16
Zone A: Not acceptable if visible at a distance of > 800 mm
Zone B: Not acceptable if visible at a distance of > 1200 mm
No. 4a: Bubbles

Data:
Definition: Generally round, even protrusions (hollow inside).
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 2 of 17
16

No. 4b: Pitting

Data:
Definition: Generally circular, crater-like depressions in the top
coat or intermediate coats. Typified by raised edges.
No. 5: Impression marks

Data:
Definition: Irregularly distributed, slight spots or depressions to
the surface, over very limited areas, caused by the
compression of foreign bodies.
Process allocation: 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 16
Zone A: D = 0.7 mm max. 2 depressions within a spacing of 400 mm
Zone B: D = 1.0 mm max. 4 depressions within a spacing of 300 mm
No. 6: Anodising splits

Data:
Definition: Micro-splits : small, linear features in the anodising
coating, caused by excessive local deformation of the
component or excessive coating build-up during
anodizing.
Process allocation: 1
No. 7: Colour misting

Data:
Definition: Fine, dust-like paint particles on the surface, not
distributed in a homogenous manner in the paint film;
drop-like paint particles distributed over the paint film.
Zone B: Acceptable
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 3 of 17
16

No. 8: Colour differences

Data:
Definition: Colour deviation on a surface by comparison with the
neighbouring surface or reference sample. This results
from :
(a) materials
(b) process
(c) subjective impression : saturation; brightness; purity;
level of sheen; depth; surface structure.
Process allocation: 2, 3, 6, 13
Zone A: Deviation refer to MTP sample(s)
No. 9: Swollen edges

Data:
Definition: A thickening of paint coatings (bulging) on edges of
components, such as are caused by surface tensions.
The effect correlates primarily with the edge radius
and/or the position of the component during the
process.
Zone B: Acceptable
No. 10: Flecks

Data:
Definition: Sharply delineated, local dulling of the surface, caused
for example, by dirt / corrosion in spots or larger areas,
or drying flecks.
Process allocation: 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 13
Zone A: Not acceptable
Zone B: Not acceptable
No. 11: Flash on tool split line

Data:
Definition: Flash which can occur where there is a mismatch
between parts of a tool or sliders (e.g., plastic residues
on injection-moulded parts).
Can also be caused by wear and overflows.
Process allocation: 5, 6, 13
Zone A: Max. +0.3 mm
Zone B: Max. +0.5 mm
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 4 of 17
16

No. 12: Differences in sheen

Data:
Definition: The sheen (or gloss) differs from that of the (master)
sample or specification figure on some areas or over
complete surfaces.
No. 13: Flash / burrs

Data:
Definition: Sharp-edged projection of edge zones from earlier
process (e.g., stamping burrs on cut edges; flash on
plastic mouldings; paint grit).
No. 14: Grittiness

Data:
Definition: Visual (optical) effect which can occur by diffuse
reflection on interfaces between different structures
(e.g., etched granularity).
No. 15: Hairline splits

Data:
Definition: Extremely fine lines of damage.
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 5 of 17
16

No. 16: Contact / gripping points

Data:
Definition: Small areas, usually as spots where paint / coating is
missing (in an area not normally visible), caused by
suspension clamps, contact with painting frames, etc.).
No. 17: Scratches; grooves

Data:
Definition: Lines of damage, caused by inappropriate
handling.(e.g., when removing parts from the tool).
Examples of permissible characteristic features (longitudinal):
Zone A: L < 4mm, W < 0,5mm
Max. 2 scratches within 300 mm
Zone B: L < 10mm, W < 0,7mm
Max. 4 scratches within 200 mm
Examples of permissible characteristic features (transverse):
Zone B: Not acceptable
No. 18: Paint runs

Data:
Definition: Tracks of paint in the top coat or in an undercoat, on
vertical surfaces (generally in the vicinity of grooves,
rounded sections, folds or piercings).
Zone B: Acceptable
No. 19: Lens-like paint marks

Data:
Definition: Distortion in paint surface which can be seen but not
felt: paint runs / streaks in the early stages.
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 6 of 17
16

No. 20: Thin coating areas

Data:
Definition: Inadequate top coating (the substrate can be seen
through the surface coating)
No. 21: Macro-splits

Data:
Definition: Splits in the galvanic coating, caused by deformation
or stresses in the component.
No. 22: Pin-holes

Data:
Definition: Very small cratering (see No. 4b); also micro-pores.
Zone A: A frequency of max. 5 pin-holes
2
over 4 cm permitted
Zone B: Pin-holes permitted
No. 23: Nickel patches

Data:
Definition: Yellowish places in the contact area and in areas
where the current density is low.
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 7 of 17
16

No. 24: "Orange-peel" effect

Data:
Definition: A rough or wave-like appearance of a painted surface
which may contain a texture; a grained paint finish with
the structure of an orange peel.
Zone A: A fine structure is permitted refer to limit sample for
severity and surface area.
Zone B: A coarse structure is permitted refer to limit sample
for severity and surface area.
No. 25: Oxide lines

Data:
Definition: Identification :
Streaks caused by oxide inclusions and/or oxide lines.
Description & effects :
Pencil-like, white or grey lines in the direction in which
the part was formed. The degree of visibility depends
on the type and quantity of oxide inclusions.
Zone A: Not permitted if structures visible at a distance of > 800 mm.
Zone B: Not permitted if structures visible at a distance of > 1200 mm.
No. 26: Pimpling / inclusions

Data:
Definition: Contamination within the surface, such as dust or fluff,
which protrudes in some areas through the coating or
growths causing problems in the build-up of coats.
Process allocation: 1 -7, 15
Zone A: See Section 10.2
Zone B: See Section 10.2
No. 27: Pigmentation problems

Data:
Definition: Disorientation of pigments
(e.g., metal flakes).
No illustration available
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 8 of 17
16

No. 28: Various polishing defects

Data:
Definition: Collective category for defects not often encountered /
which form a small percentage of defects
Stippling:
Polygonal, flecked areas caused by

material residues which have been polished in.
Dull areas: These occur following electrolytic sheening and

are caused by excessive local heating; also
surfaces areas which have not been sufficiently
polished.
Holograms: Polishing defects with a 3-dimensional effect.
These occur particularly with dark paint colours.
Polishing flecks: Restricted circular areas with a much
smoother surface than the surroundings

Zone A: Not permitted if visible at a distance of > 800 mm.
Zone B: Not permitted if visible at a distance of > 1200 mm.
No. 28a: Stippling

Data:
Definition: Polygonal, flecked areas caused by material
residues which have been polished in.
Process allocation:
No. 28b: Dull areas

Data:
Definition: These occur following electrolytic sheening and are
caused by excessive local heating; also surfaces areas
which have not been sufficiently polished.
Process allocation:
No. 28c: Holograms

Data:
Definition: Polishing defects with a 3-dimensional effect. These
occur particularly with dark paint colours.
Process allocation:
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 9 of 17
16

No. 28d: Polishing flecks

Data:
Definition: Restricted circular areas with a much smoother
surface than the surroundings.
Process allocation:
No. 29: Polishing "fish" / "comet tails"

Data:
Definition: Depressions in a shape similar to that of a fish, caused
during the polishing process by a foreign body, a pore
or other pre-conditioning from earlier processes, such
as grinding.
Zone A: D < 0.3 mm, W < 2.5 mm, L < 5 mm
Max. 2 within a spacing of 400 mm
Zone B: D < 0.5 mm, W < 3 mm, L < 8 mm
No. 30: Polishing streaks

Data:
Definition: Very fine, localised raising of visible ribs, caused by
the polishing process (incorrect polishing paste and /
or disc was used).
Zone A: L < 60 mm, B < 0.5 mm,
Zone B: L < 80 mm, B < 3 mm,
No. 31: Pores

Data:
Definition: Small holes, visible with the naked eye, in the top
coating, which may penetrate to the base material in
places.
Zone A: See Section 10.2
Zone B: See Section 10.2
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 10 of 17
16

No. 32: Indications of seams / seam-welds

Data:
Definition: Identification:
Traces of longitudinal seams (extrusion press marks)
Traces of weld areas.
Description & effects:
Traces of (narrow) streaks, running in the direction in which
the part was formed, where the area is seen as lighter or
darker than the surrounding material, depending on lighting
conditions. They can also occur in association with sink-marks
or step-marks. Indications of longitudinal seam / seam-welds
are caused by manufacturing processes and are unavoidable;
however, the level of their appearance can be influenced.
No. 33: Scour marks

Data:
Definition: Flat, local roughing of the surface, generally seen as
differences in levels of sheen.
No. 34: Step marks (linear traces of rolling)

Data:
Definition: Stripes, running parallel to the direction of the
pressing / extrusion, over the length of the profile,
generally in the form of steps , which are especially
visible after a coating process.

Zone A: Not acceptable if visible at > 800 mm.
Zone B: Not acceptable if visible at > 1200 mm.
No. 35: Striations

Data:
Definition: Liquation streaks with an electro-potentiostatic effect,
caused by pre-treatment for anodising and resulting
from liquation in the incoming material
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 11 of 17
16

No. 36: Graininess

Data:
Definition: Slight graininess of a galvanised surface; comparable
with the "orange peel" appearance on painted surfaces
No. 37: Corrugations

Data:
Definition: Wave-like, parallel marks on the surface of the panel or profile,
at an angle to the direction of rolling or compression, which
can be seen in special observation positions (e.g., looking in
the rear-view mirror, reflection in a longitudinal direction at a
very shallow angle of observation).

Zone A: Not permitted when checked under the following conditions :
component in its "installed" position

artificial light-source 1.2 m over the component
checked at 2.5 m 0.5 m from the component
direction of observation is at 20-45 to the longitudinal axis
of the vehicle with static observation
Zone B: Not permitted if visible at > 4 m

when evaluated as described for Zone A
No. 38a: Cloudiness/ fogging/ streaks

Data:
Definition: When polishing: local areas which are matt, dull, cloudy or
streaky, with diffuse transfer between different areas (process

allocation 9).
When painting: noticeable, partially light or dark areas within a
(metallic) paint finish with diffuse transfer from one area to the
next (process allocation 3).
Dull areas within the overall surface; with diffuse transfer from
one area to the next
Process allocation 6, 7)
No. 38b: Streaks caused by moisture / air

Data:
Definition: These occur during plastic injection moulding and are
caused by moisture in the plastic or air inclusions
during the injection moulding process.
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 12 of 17
16

No. 39: Differences in coating thicknesses

Data:
Definition: These occur during galvanizing as a result of
inappropriate current density distribution (process
allocation 6) or in other processes because of different
particulate flows / flow angles or separation conditions.
No. 40: Sink marks

Data:
Definition: Visible dents in the surface, caused by elements on
the other side of the component, such as ribs, steps
and domes (process allocation 6).
Dents in the surface, caused by inappropriate
component geometry and / or shrinkage (process
allocation 12).
No. 41: Converging flow marks

Data:
Definition: Visible scratch-like flow-marks on plastic parts where
flow fronts converge.
No. 42: Sucker marks

Data:
Definition: The result of contact between the surface and rubber
suckers. They are visible marks, caused by sucker
deposits when removing the part following the process.
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 13 of 17
16

No. 43: Seam welds

Data:
Definition: These occur at the convergence of two mass flows
after piercings and domes (converging seam welds).
No. 44: Moisture inclusions

Data:
Definition: Damp material, caused by incorrect preparation of the
material. Expanding moisture is deposited as streaks
or bubbles on the surface of the article.
Zone B: Refer to MTP sample(s) Acceptable
No. 45: Holes

Data:
Definition: Holes in the surface coating, visible with the naked
eye, penetrating to the base material.
No. 46: Alignment gap / offset

Data:
Definition: Alignment gap :
Caused by inaccurate alignment of veneers / a line is
visible.
Alignment offset :
Caused by inaccurate alignment of veneer / an offset
in structural symmetry
Zone B: Acceptable
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 14 of 17
16

No. 47: Patch marks

Data:
Definition: Caused by voids, holes and splits.
Zone B: Acceptable
No. 48: Jagged knife edges

Data:
Definition: Damage caused by a knife when peeling / deburring
the component.
No. 49: Differences in structure and texture

Data:
Definition: Uneven structure. Branches and bars not adequately
formed. This occurs in nature.
Zone B: Acceptable
No. 50: Compressed folds

Data:
Definition: Visible lines; overlapping materials.
Zone B: Acceptable
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 15 of 17
16

No. 51: Paint residues

Data:
Definition: Parts of the surface have not been removed by the
laser process.
No. 52: Burn marks

Data:
Definition: Thermal changes in the plastic substrate (changes in
colour).
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 16 of 17
16

Imprint
The entire contents of these pages are protected by copyright.

Responsible for contents:
VDA QMC
Qualitts Management Center
im Verband der Automobilindustrie
VDA QMC
An den Drei Hasen 31
D-61440 Oberursel
GERMANY
Phone:
Fax:
E-Mail:
Web:
+49 (0)6171 / 9122-0

+49 (0)6171 / 9122-14
info@vda-qmc.de
www.vda-qmc.de
In spite of great care mistakes can not be completely ruled out.

In the case of differing information please consider the printed VDA Volume 16 as correct.
Version 1.0
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
6) Galvanizing

8) Over-moulding
9) Polishing

17) Laser lettering
Page 17 of 17
Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness

Instructions:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
The following spreadsheet is used to calculate an Attribute GR&R Effectiveness, in which up to

100 samples can be evaluated, using 2 or 3 operators.
In the Data Entry worksheet fill in the appropriate information in the Scoring Report section and
enter the type of Attributes you are evaluating in the Attribute Legend section. YOU MUST ENTER
THE INFORMATION IN THE ATTRIBUTE LEGEND SECTION OR THE SPREADSHEET
WILL NOT WORK. The attributes can be either alpha or numeric, e.g. Yes, No; pass, fail;
go, stop; or 1, 2. You must be consistent throughout the form and spell properly.
If you or an expert has selected samples to be evaluated and you know what attributes these
samples are, enter this information in the Attribute sample column. This will enable you to determine
how well each operator can evaluate a set of samples against a known standard. You do not
need to enter information in this column for the spreadsheet to work although you will
not be able to assess the operators against known standards.
You do not have to specify how many operators or the # of samples that you will be evaluating
during the test. Simply enter the data into the spreadsheet under the specific operator. Remember
the attributes must be spelled properly or the spreadsheet will not analyze the data correctly.
To print a copy of the report click on the Print Report icon.
To delete the data in the spreadsheet, click on the Delete Data icon.
To delete all and begin a new test, click on the Delete All icon
To see a Demo of the Attribute GR&R Effectiveness spreadsheet, click on the Demo icon.
Move around the spread sheet to see the data. When you are finished click the Delete All icon
to delete all data to begin entering your own data.
The 95% UCL and 95% LCL represent the 95% upper and lower confidence limits on the
binomial distribution. The Calculated Score is the basic computation reported on the report
page for % Appraiser and % Score vs Attribute. The 95% confidence interval represents
the range within which the true Calculated Score lies given the uncertainty associated with
limited sample sizes. As sample size increases (in this case, Total Inspected) the
confidence interval will get smaller and smaller which indicates more reliable estimates of
the true percentages. In the case of the Demo data, the true Calculated score for Operator 1
could be as low as 76.8% given that only 14 samples inspected, even though there was a 100%
Appraiser value calculated. Also, even though Operator 2 had a lower score, Operators 1 and 3
cannot be distinguished from Operator 2 because the calculated score of #2 (78.6%) lies within
the confidence limits for Operators 1 and 3.
With a worksheet limitation of 100 samples, at best a lower 95% limit of 96.4% can be calculated.
Thus, we would have to say that an inspector could be as bad as 96% efficient, even though he/she
missed no calls.
Sample Size
# Matches
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
30
30
100,0%
100,0%
88,4%
< Try out different combinations of number of samples and number of matches
< to see the effects of sample size. In this case, a sample size of 30 with
< one non-match will yield a 17% confidence interval. In order to get reasonable
< reliability in estimates of efficiency, large sample sizes will be required.
Page 1 of 5
Attributiven_Gage_R&R-Studie
Data Entry

SCORING REPORT
5
Attribute Legend
(used in computations)
1 Pass
2 Fail
Known Population
Sample #
Attribute
1
Pass
2
Pass
3
Pass
4
Pass
5
Fail
6
Fail
7
Pass
8
Pass
9
Fail
10
Pass
11
Pass
12
Pass
13
Pass
14
Pass
15
Fail
16
Pass
17
Pass
18
Pass
19
Fail
20
Pass
21
Pass
22
Pass
23
Pass
24
Pass
25
Fail
26
Pass
27
Pass
28
Pass
29
Fail
30
Pass
31
99
100
Operator #1
Try #1
Try #2
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
% APPRAISER SCORE(1) ->

% SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE
(2)
->
DATE:
NAME:
PRODUCT:
BUSINESS:
04.01.2001
Acme Employee
Widgets
All operators
Earth Products
Operator #2
Try #1
Try #2
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Operator #3
Try #1
Try #2
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
100,00%
100,00%
83,33%
93,33%
96,67%
80,00%
SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) ->
agree within and
All Operators
between each
agree with
Other
standard
Y/N
Agree
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y/N
Agree
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
80,00%
SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE
(4)
->
76,67%
Note:
Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials
Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
(3) All operators agreed within and between themselves
(4) All operators agreed within and between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
(5) Enter Pass/Fail, Good/Bad, Accept/Reject or other labels which indicate status of inspection
(1)
(2)
Page 2 of 5
Report
SCORING REPORT
DATE:
NAME:
PRODUCT:
BUSINESS:
Attribute Legend
1 Pass
2 Fail
Known Population
Sample #
Attribute
1
Pass
2
Pass
3
Pass
4
Pass
5
Fail
6
Fail
7
Pass
8
Pass
9
Fail
10
Pass
11
Pass
12
Pass
13
Pass
14
Pass
15
Fail
16
Pass
17
Pass
18
Pass
19
Fail
20
Pass
21
Pass
22
Pass
23
Pass
24
Pass
25
Fail
26
Pass
27
Pass
28
Pass
29
Fail
30
Pass
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
-
Operator #1
Try #1
Try #2
04.01.2001
Acme Employee
Widgets
Earth Products
Operator #2
Try #1
Try #2
All operators
agree within and All Operators
between each
agree with
Other
standard
Operator #3
Try #1
Try #2
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
% APPRAISER SCORE(1) ->

% SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE(2) ->
100,00%
93,33%
100,00%
96,67%
Y/N
Agree
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y/N
Agree
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
83,33%
80,00%
SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) ->

80,00%
SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE(4) -> 76,67%
Note:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

All operators agreed within and between themselves
All operators agreed within and between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
Enter Pass/Fail, Good/Bad, Accept/Reject or other labels which indicate status of inspection
Page 3 of 5

Statistical Report - Attribute Gage R&R Study

DATE:
NAME:
PRODUCT:
BUSINESS:
04.01.2001
Acme Employee
Widgets
Earth Products
% Appraiser1
Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3
30
30
30
30
30
25
Source
Total Inspected
# Matched
False Negative (operator rejected good product)
False Positive (operator accepted bad product)
Mixed
95% UCL
100,0%
100,0%
Calculated Score
100,0%
100,0%
95% LCL
88,4%
88,4%
Screen % Effective Score3

30
24
Total Inspected
# in Agreement
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
1
1
0
99,2%
93,3%
77,9%
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
110,0%
110,0%
90,0%
80,0%
80,0%
70,0%
70,0%
% Efficiency
100,0%
40,0%
60,0%
50,0%
40,0%
30,0%
30,0%
20,0%
20,0%
10,0%
10,0%
0,0%
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
% Score vs Appraiser
90,0%
50,0%
0
1
5
92,3%
80,0%
61,4%
90,1%
76,7%
57,7%
100,0%
60,0%
0
1
0
99,9%
96,7%
82,8%
Screen % Effective Score vs Attribute4

30
23
92,3%
80,0%
61,4%
% Appraiser
% Efficiency
94,4%
83,3%
65,3%
%Score vs Attribute2
Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3
30
30
30
28
29
24
0,0%
Operator #1
Operator #2
Operator #3
Operator #1
Operator #2
Operator #3
Notes
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

All operators agreed within and between themselves
All operators agreed within & between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
Page 4 of 5
Calculations
Known Population
Sample #
Attribute
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
2
6
2
7
1
8
1
9
2
10
1
11
1
12
1
13
1
14
1
15
2
16
1
17
1
18
1
19
2
20
1
21
1
22
1
23
1
24
1
25
2
26
1
27
1
28
1
29
2
30
1
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
% Appraiser Score
Operator #1
Try #1
Try #2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
100,00%
Operator #2
Try #1
Try #2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
100,00%
Operator #3
Try #1
Try #2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
Y/N
Agree
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
TRUE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
Y/N
Agree
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
TRUE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
83,33%
Page 5 of 5


VDA Volume 16 Englisch Pictures

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

VDA Volume 16 Englisch Pictures

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

16

Appendix to VDA Volume 16

No. 28a: Stippling

No. 4a: Bubbles

No. 28c: Holograms

No. 4b: Pitting

No. 28d: Polishing flecks

No. 30: Polishing streaks

No. 31: Pores

No. 32: Indications of seams / seam-welds

No. 29: Polishing "fish" / "comet tails"

No. 33: Scour marks

No. 10: Flecks

No. 34: Step marks (linear traces of rolling)

No. 11: Flash on tool split line

No. 35: Striations

No. 12: Differences in sheen

No. 36: Graininess

No. 13: Flash / burrs

No. 37: Corrugations

No. 14: Grittiness

No. 38a: Cloudiness/ fogging/ streaks

No. 15: Hairline splits

No. 38b: Streaks caused by moisture / air

No. 16: Contact / gripping points

No. 39: Differences in coating thicknesses

No. 17: Scratches; grooves

No. 40: Sink marks

No. 18: Paint runs

No. 41: Converging flow marks

No. 19: Lens-like paint marks

No. 42: Sucker marks

No. 20: Thin coating areas

No. 43: Seam welds

No. 21: Macro-splits

No. 44: Moisture inclusions

No. 22: Pin-holes

No. 45: Holes

No. 23: Nickel patches

No. 46: Alignment gap / offset

No. 24: "Orange-peel" effect

No. 47: Patch marks

No. 25: Oxide lines

No. 26: Pimpling / inclusions

7) Plasma process (evaporation, sputter, CVD, PVD)

No. 27: Pigmentation problems

No. 48: Jagged knife edges

13) Refined wood surfaces

No. 50: Compressed folds

No. 51: Paint residues

Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom

Nur zur internen Verwendung fr TRW Automotive GmbH bestimmt.

Appendix to VDA Volume 16

No. 2: Burn marks

No. 4a: Bubbles

7) Plasma process (evaporation, sputter, CVD, PVD)

13) Refined wood surfaces

Nur zur internen Verwendung fr TRW Automotive GmbH bestimmt.

Appendix to VDA Volume 16

No. 4b: Pitting

No. 5: Impression marks

No. 6: Anodising splits

No. 7: Colour misting

7) Plasma process (evaporation, sputter, CVD, PVD)