Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Image Acquisition
obtain image from a person
using sensor
Preprocessing
remove useless information from iris image
extract the region of interest (iris)
include segmentation (isolate iris ring) and normalization (provide inavariant
iris area, form ROI into rectangular region)*
Matching step
distasnce measure between generated iris code and stored iris code are
being calculated**
Note
*Due to the two ring of the iris are not co-centric, Integro-differential
operator by Daugman is being used to detect the inner and outer boundaries
(Daugman, 2004).
**Daugman using Hamming distance and threshold around 0.34
than
the
next
neighbor
otherwise
value
of
is
given.
As show in the above equation, M1 and M2 are the variation binary codes for the
iris images. S value for the ith block is equal to 1 if the value of M1 for ith block is
equal to the value of M2 for ith block. Nb is representing the total number of blocks
and this value is based on the degree of decomposition of the iris image. If value of
Dis is above certain threshold, the two iris images (1 and 2) are referred as same
person.
Public iris database, CASIA is being used to evaluate the performance of the
system. As suggest by (Hamouchene & Aouat, 2014), three images from each person
are taken as reference and 80 images will be used as test images where each image are
referred as query. For each of the image, LBP histogram and mean variation of the
NBP image are being extracted. Between the querys feature and extracted features,
hamming distance is being calculated. By sorting the hamming distance from most
similar to less similar, the top three is being considered and the query iris is classified
by referring the majority (highest similarity).
Figure: Recognition rate for LBP and NBP method for each person
From the above graph, we can see that NBP method is way better than the LBP
method as the LBPs global rate is only 58.75% where NBPs rate is 76.25%. This is
because of NBP method is comparing the neighborhood pixel values with its adjacent
pixel values instead of being threshold by the central pixel values. In other words, we
can say there is relationship among the neighborhood pixel values for NBP method.
This result had shown the robustness and efficiency of the NBP method as compared
with LBP method.
Conclusion
We can conclude that NBP method is having good performance as compared with
LBP. This is because of there is relative connection between the neighborhood pixels
as each one of them is being thresholded by the adjacent neighbor and encoded. Not
only that, NBP image is being decomposed into number of blocks where their
variation of mean values are being extracted and encoded. This will result the binary
matrix being used as the feature descriptor for the iris image.
References
Hamouchene, I., & Aouat, S. (2014). A New Texture Analysis Approach for Iris
Recognition. AASRI Procedia, 9, 2-7.
Daugman, J. (2004). How iris recognition works. Circuits and Systems for Video
Technology, IEEE Transactions on, 14(1), 21-30.
CASIA iris image database (v1.0), The National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition
(NLPR), Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), 2006