Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CLINICAL GUIDELINES
Title of Guideline: Enteral Feeding in adults
Date First Issued: July 2009
Version: 21
Dr Tim Bowling
Consultant in Gastroenterology
Dr T Bowling
QMC Campus
Ext 63862
Document Derivation:
Consultation Process:
Nutrition Steering Committee
subgroup on complex nutrition
Heads of (relevant) Services
Ratified by:
Distribution:
This guideline has been registered with the Trust. However, clinical
guidelines are guidelines only. The interpretation and application of clinical
guidelines will remain the responsibility of the individual clinician. If in doubt
contact a senior colleague or expert. Caution is advised when using the
guidelines after the review date.
CONTENTS
Page
Abbreviations
Introduction
7
9
10
10
11
12
14
15
17
18
18
24
25
26
26
26
26
27
27
28
Administering feed
Gastric feeding
29
29
29
30
33
35
35
37
40
40
40
41
41
43
43
44
2
50
52
52
53
54
61
61
61
61
61
63
63
65
66
APPENDICES
1
68
77
86
88
91
96
98
ABBREVIATIONS
CNC
CNNS
HEFT
MUST
NG
NJ
NUH
NSC
NST
S<
The members of the working group for this document have been:
Kathryn Blount
Tracey Buchanan
Janet Crowe
Ewan Forbes
Specialist Dietitian
Zoe Hooley
Azma Malik
Hannah Meanwell
Specialist Dietitian
Sian Rajakaruna
Kathy Teahon
INTRODUCTION
These guidelines are about enteral feeding in adults. This is the administration of nutrients
directly into the intestinal tract via a tube. The indications, broadly speaking, are for those
patients who have a functioning gut but unable to take any or adequate nutrition in by mouth.
There is considerable overlap between the services described in this guideline and the dietetic
and ward services for nutritional care. All patients should be nutritionally screened by ward
staff and those deemed at nutritional risk, for whatever reason, should be referred to the ward
dietitian for further assessment. The nutrition support team, either as a whole or an individual
from the team (usually the nurse) can be asked to review any patient by any member of the
attending multi-professional team. The key remit of the nutrition team is to determine the
need for artificial nutritional support and to facilitate such an intervention when required.
These guidelines will take the reader through the essential background, evidence and
practicalities of enteral nutrition.
Other related/relevant Trust guidelines:
Intravenous or parenteral feeding
Prevention and Management of Refeeding Syndrome: Guidelines for Adults
Feeding in critical care (also included as an appendix here)
Passing and Checking the Position of a Wide Bore Nasogastric Tube (also included as an
appendix here)
SECTION 1
POLICIES, STANDARDS & AUDIT PROPOSALS
The nutritional status of all inpatients will be assessed and monitored using the
national Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) or a clinically appropriate
adaptation approved by the Nutrition Steering Committee.
II.
The nutritional status of appropriate outpatients and day-care patients will be assessed
and monitored using the modified MUST or a clinically appropriate adaptation.
III.
Patients assessed to be at nutritional risk with swallowing difficulties and for whom
first line guidance is not appropriate, or those who are consistently failing despite
dietetic support, will be referred for consideration of artificial feeding.
IV.
V.
Decision support, via the Trusts Clinical Ethics committee, will be available for staff
when there is difficulty in making or implementing a decision about the
appropriateness of feeding
VI.
VII.
VIII.
The best route for enteral feeding will, in usual circumstances be determined
following the NUH Choosing a route for enteral feeding algorithm.
The most appropriate tubes and stomas for use in particular circumstances will be
determined following the NUH guideline Choosing an enteral feeding tube or
stoma. In this circumstance appropriateness refers to: licence for use, availability
and competence in the trust for insertion, care and maintenance.
If the clinical circumstance results in a variance from the Choosing a route for enteral
feeding or the Choosing an enteral feeding tube or stoma guidelines the variance
and the reason for it will be clearly documented in the patients record.
IX.
All tubes and stomas used for enteral feeding will be appropriate for that use and will
be placed by staff who are competent to do so.
X.
The clinical assessment and care of tubes and stomas used for enteral feeding will be,
by staff who are competent to do so.
XI.
A full range of dietary formulae will be available in stock to meet the usual needs of
patients in the Acute Hospital setting. Non-stock formulae can be obtained on a named
patient, evidence based, basis.
XII.
Dietary regimens will be prescribed and monitored by dietetic staff ,who are
appropriately experienced in the relevant area of clinical care. For Out of hours
there will be Starter Regimen guidance available.
XIII.
Dedicated & standardized prescription charts will be used for the prescription of
enteral feeds
XIV.
Guidance will be available (via the intranet, the dietitians and nutrition support team)
on the identification and management of common clinical problems which can occur
during feeding such as: Problems with tubes & stomas, Re-feeding syndrome,
7
XVI.
XVII.
XVIII.
XIX.
XX.
XXI.
When patients are transferred into the Trust with feeding tubes or stomas already in
place, the appropriateness, integrity and position of these tubes and stomas will be
confirmed before use.
Consent will be obtained for feeding and for the insertion of all tubes and stomas
following Trust guidelines
Patient information will be available for all usual types and routes of enteral feeding
Teaching, Training and Competency assessment, packages will be available for
relevant staff for the insertion, care and maintenance of tubes and stomas used in
enteral feeding.
Teaching, Training and Competency assessment, packages will be available for
relevant staff in the identification and management of the common clinical problems
which can occur during feeding.
Teaching, training and competency assessment and evidence thereof will be the
responsibility of the individual directorates.
Regular audit of service standards will be performed and the service will be reviewed
in response to this. Such audits will be the responsibility of individual directorates to
perform and provide evidence thereof.
STANDARDS OF SERVICE
I.
II.
III.
The relevant route of feeding is implemented for all patients, where clinically
appropriate, according to the sub-speciality guideline and achieved within three
working days
IV.
The tubes and stomas in use are in line with the NUH guidelines and appropriate for
the clinical needs of the patient
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
X.
XI.
The care and maintenance of all tubes and stomas is in accordance with the guidelines
The dietary regimens prescribed and administered via tubes and stomas are in
accordance with the guidelines for all patients
All patients being enterally fed are appropriately monitored as detailed in the relevant
guideline/care pathway
Nutrition support team advice and guidance is available during working hours and
relevant out of hours guidance is available
For all patients, in whom, there is difficulty making or implementing a decision about
the appropriateness of enteral feeding, decision support is available, is easily accessed
and is accessed.
Enteral feeding records are accurate, available and up-to-date for all patients
The service standards are regularly audited by the relevant Directorates
AUDIT PROPOSALS
Each directorate in the Trust should be able to demonstrate compliance with the above service
standards. Regular audit is essential. We recommend a three yearly audit cycle, auditing one
or two of the audits detailed below every year. The audit templates will be made available.
The recommended main audits are:
1. A Directorate audit of individual patient documentation associated with insertion and
checking of nasogastric and nasojejunal feeding tubes
2. An audit of the Directorates nutritional screening and management of outpatients
3. An audit of the Directorates staff training and competency profile in nutritional
screening and in the management of feeding tubes and stomas
4. An audit of the Directorates use of patient information on enteral feeding
5. An audit of the time from decision of route for feeding to the establishment of the
route
REFERENCES
NICE 2006 Nutrition Support for Adults Oral Nutrition Support, Enteral Tube feeding and
Parenteral Nutrition
St Marks & The Burdett Institute of Gastrointestinal Nursing (2005) Adult Enteral Nutrition
Guidelines
De La Torre AM (2001)
Nutrition 4 (6A) 1379-1384
Stroud M (2003) Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients GUT 2003 52 Suppl
VII
Raykher A
2007 Enteral Nutrition Support of Head & Neck Cancer patients Nutrition in
Clinical Practice Vol 22: 68-73
10
SECTION 2
GUIDELINES, PROCEDURES AND CARE
PATHWAYS
11
Patients who have been identified by MUST to be at nutritional risk, who have already been
seen by the ward dietitians and in whom there is concern either about the appropriateness or
the choice of route for feeding
Patients who have been identified as needing a feeding gastrostomy (by either endoscopic,
radiological or surgical method)
Patients who have gastrostomy or jejunostomy, tube or stoma related problems (retention,
blockage)
Patients who have NG tube related problems (initial placement, retention, blockage)
Patients who have NJ tube related probems (initial placement, retention, blockage)
Please note
The NST also deal with patients on parenteral nutrition (see the parenteral nutrition
guidelines)
Problems with feeding or infusion pump problems are usually dealt with by the equipment
library staff but the nutrition nurse specialists can also offer support
How to refer
All referrals must be made on NotIS
For PEG Assessment the order code is PEG
For all other referrals the order code is CNNS
If there is an urgent need the nurses can be bleeped on (City campus Bleep 80 6993 or Queens campus
Bleep 80 6417), however when there is a need to bleep the referral should be confirmed on NotIS
For Patients with NJ tube related problems the relevant guidelines are:
Care of a patient receiving jejunal feeding (page 54)
For patients with feeding gastrostomy or jejunostomy problems the relevant guidelines are:
Care of patients being fed through a gastrostomy (page 43)
Care of a patient receiving jejunal feeding (page 54)
For feed & pump problems please refer to:
Administration of feed using a feeding pump & commercially prepared feed in a pack (page
29)
Administration of feed using a feeding pump & reconstitution of powdered feed (page 30)
Administration of feed using a feeding pump & feed decanted into a reservoir bottle (page 33)
For patients with TPN related problems please refer to:
Guideline Care of patient receiving TPN (this is a separate guideline)
Who
Ward dietitian
How
Ward based referral
Ward dietitian
Ward dietitian
Ward dietitian
Nutrition Support consultant
13
appropriateness of feeding
14
Patient assessed using MUST relevant for the clinical setting and is unable to maintain
nutritional requirements with oral intake
Prognosis is assessed to
be < 4 weeks
Unsure
Yes
No
Feeding usually
inappropriate. Follow
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Small intestine is
No
to dementia
Yes
jejunal feeding
No
Yes
NG tube
or one develops
Yes
No
Jejunostomy or
Gastrostomy
Gastro-jejunostomy
15
ROUTE OF FEEDING
The algorithm on page 15 outlines guidance for the selection of patients for enteral feeding in its
broadest sense. It should be combined with the text below, and support from NST should be sought if
there is any concern. In brief:
16
NASOGASTRIC FEEDING
INTRODUCTION
Nasogastric tube (NG) feeding remains the most common and the simplest method of providing
relatively short-term artificial nutritional support for intervals of 4 6 weeks. The decision to start
tube feeding, which type of tube to use, the type of feed and diet and the feed regimen should be a
team decision involving doctor, nurse, dietitian, speech and language therapist and patient. Unless
specifically required/requested, the NST would not normally be involved in these decision. The role of
the ward team is crucial, but it is often the nurse who administers the feed and observes the patient for
signs of improvement and/or complications. Therefore excellent communication between the nurse
and the other members of the team is essential.
The feed can be given intermittently and it is common practice to give a break of at least 4 hours each
day. During the rest period, the tube is usually flushed with fresh freshly drawn drinking tap water.
How often and how much depends on the individual patient. Always refer to the individuals
feeding regimen provided by the dietitian or, if unavailable, consult the dietitian.
For most people, eating is an enjoyable and social experience as well as a physiological necessity. A
patient who is tube fed may no longer be able to eat and drink orally and enjoy his/her food. If this is
so, nurses have a responsibility to help the patient come to terms with this situation and endeavour to
help the patient not feel isolated.
Routine mouth care is vitally important for the patient unable to eat or drink; mouthwashes and oral
mouth care should be offered (Hamilton, 2000). (See Guidelines Care of the Mouth).
A fine bore tube can be passed by a health care professional who has been assessed as competent to
perform the procedure. Staff should only start a feed when the tube position has been
documented as correct (see below).
Nasogastric feeding via a wide-bore tube, e.g. a Ryles tube is possible but is not recommended as:
It is uncomfortable for patients
Has increased risk of complications (reflux & aspiration)
Can impair normal swallowing
Can cause nasal and oesophageal erosions.
Feeding via a wide bore tube usually only takes place in critical care and some other specialised areas
and each will have area specific guidelines. Widebore tube feeding in Critical Care should only be
considered in the early stages of enteral feeding if it is necessary to aspirate the contents of the
stomach to check for gastric emptying (Rollins, 1997). In ENT wide bore tubes may be used to
maintain the patency of the tracheo-oesophageal puncture for voice rehabilitation. The decision to feed
via a wide bore tube should be made by the specialist team.
17
If feeding via a fine bore nasogastric tube is anticipated to last longer than 4-6 weeks, referral for
gastrostomy placement should be considered
bore tubes used in Nottingham University Hospitals Trust require the guide wire to be removed prior
to x-ray or aspiration to ascertain the tube position. This ensures that the tube is not displaced
following subsequent removal of the guide wire. To remove the guide wire, refer to the
manufacturers instructions. Some tubes may have a lubricated coating, which is activated by water.
Other tubes may require further lubrication with a water-soluble jelly prior to insertion before the wire
can be removed.
Guide wires should not be reused or reinserted into the tube as this can cause perforation of the tube.
Syringes
Please see separate guidance: Syringes for Oral & Enteral Use Note that syringes used in hospital
for enteral feeding are single use only.
EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR FEEDING TUBE PLACEMENT
Fine bore nasogastric (NG) tube
Hypo-allergenic tape or commercial attacher
50ml purple enteral syringe
Drinking straw and glass of water (if patient can swallow safely)
Measuring jug and freshly drawn drinking tap water
pH paper
Lubricating gel
Disposable non-sterile gloves
Disposable apron
Rationale
1.
2.
3.
To give the patient a sense of control, gain their cooperation and to ensure the safe passing of the tube.
4.
5.
To facilitate procedure.
6.
7.
19
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
20
Use of pH Paper
Radiography
It is generally accepted that the most reliable method of checking the position of the tube is with the
use of radiography as fine bore NG tubes are radio-opaque. However, this method can result in
excessive exposure to x-rays and delay to nutritional support. It should also be remembered that
although radiography has been recognised as the gold standard for determining tube position
(Neumann et al, 1995), it can only confirm the tube position at the time of x-ray. For these reasons the
best practice is to check position of nasogastric tubes by the pH method using radiography only when:
Patient on critical care (see Appendix 1)
Gastric aspirate cannot be obtained on at least two occasions (as above) (El-Gamel & Watson,
1993)
When the gastric aspirate is above pH 5.54 (as is often the case for patients on proton pump
inhibitor medication)
There is significant doubt that the aspirate obtained is gastric (as above)
In high-risk patients where there is any concern that the tube may be in the bronchial tree, e.g.
unconscious, sedated or intubated patients and patients with tracheostomies.
Auscultation for determining feeding tube placement should not be used. Auscultation alone is
not reliable in the checking of the tubes position, as vigorous peristalsis can be mistaken for air
entering the stomach. Insufflation of air into the tube can be misleading because auscultation over
the stomach can register sound transmitted through a tube that has been passed into the main
bronchus (Sobotka, 2000 p83). NPSA Alert 2005 CL NPSA 05-2005
The information in the document was originally developed by the National Nurses Nutrition Group
(NNNG) and further developed in collaboration with the Medicines and Healthcare products
Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA), NHS clinicians, risk
managers and other leading experts in the field. The Patient Safety Research Programme at the
University of Birmingham has commissioned additional research to assess these methods further. This
advice may therefore be revised following the outcome of this work. www.npsa.nhs.uk/advice
21
Rationale
To establish the position of the tube.
Aspirate should be pH 5.5 or below to
commence feeding. There are no known
reports of pulmonary aspirates at or below
this figure. (NPSA Safety Alert 2005).
pH indicator strips can measure this
accurately. (Metheny et al, 1989,
Neumann et al, 1995, Colagiovanni,
1999)
To rule out subjective analysis.
A smaller syringe may produce too much
pressure and split the tube (BAPEN2003)
2.
3.
4.
22
DO NOT FEED
1
DO NOT FEED
1
pH 5.54 or below
pH > 6 or above4
DO NOT FEED
1
2
Process to feed
CAUTION: If there is ANY query about position and/or the clarity of the colour change on the
pH strip, particularly between ranges 5 and 6, then feeding should not commence.
23
Best Practice
Flushing the Tube
Fine bore feeding tubes require regular flushing. If the feed is turned off, the tube is at risk of
blocking. Always ensure the tube is flushed after a feed is turned off, before and after administration
of feed or medication. Always following the instructions for flushing on the feeding regimen.
Best Practice
Checking And Re-Checking The Tube Position
Before the feed commences, administration of medications and before flushing the intra-gastric tube
position of the tube must be confirmed and documented. The tube position should also be confirmed
on each nursing shift. The registered nurse should document (Colagiovanni, 1999) how the tube
position has been checked and its distance at the nose each time the tube is used. In addition to the
above, the tubes position should be checked:
If the patient has episodes of vomiting, retching or coughing
After any oro-pharyngeal suction
If there is any change in the length of tube
At any signs of respiratory distress
If an aspirate cannot be obtained OR is above 5.54 and the tube has not moved since last (+)
check was made, it will be acceptable to commence the feed after having had a second review
by another competent practitioner
If in any doubt about the position of the tube, do not use and seek expert/medical advice.
As it is difficult to distinguish between gastric and other aspirate, visible characteristics of the
aspirate should never be used as a method for checking the tube position
Best Practice
Visible Checking of the Tube
Check and record the distance of the tube at the nose and compare with previous records. This should
be recorded at least once in 24hrs and also before commencing a new feed or administering drugs
(Cannaby et al 2002). Fixation tape should be checked, at least daily, to ensure that it is secure and
intact. Replace as necessary.
Best Practice
Health and Safety
If there appears any respiratory distress, stop the feed and check the tube position. If necessary, call
for help.
During feeding, nurse the patient at a 45o angle to reduce the risk of reflux and aspiration
NG BRIDLES
Bridles are loops which go through each nostril around the posterior aspect of the nasal septum and are
then secured to the feeding tube in front of the nose. They are intended as a method of securing
feeding tubes so that they are not easily displaced. They should be used only when standard methods
of securing feeding tubes have failed.
There are two main types of bridle:
Catheter-based, which are usually inserted by surgeons or anaesthetists when the patient is
ventilated.
Magnet based, which is a commercially available bridle kit. These can be inserted at the
bedside. There is currently only one product available and instructions for use are in the
packet insert. However these must only be inserted by those who are competent to do so and
have had the relevant training.
Indications for NG bridles:
Short-term (< six weeks) feeding in patients who frequently displace their tubes
Post operatively in upper GI surgery to ensure that tubes stay safely across an anastomosis
(but these tubes are then not usually used for feeding purposes)
24
In critically ill patients where intubation has been difficult and there is a high risk of
displacement
In general, their use outside of critical care would usually be at the discretion of the Nutrition Nurse
Specialist
REFERENCES
BAPEN (2003) Administering drugs via enteral feeding tubes - a practical guide London: BAPEN
Cannaby N, Evans L, Freeman A (2002) Nursing care of patients with nasogastric feeding tubes
British Journal of Nursing Vol. 11 No. 6 pp. 366-372
Colagiovanni L (1999) Taking the tube Nursing Times Vol. 95, No. 21 pp. 63-71
El-Gamel A, Watson D (1993) Transbronchial intubation of the right pleural space: A rare
complication of nasogastric intubation with a polyvinylchloride tube a case study Heart and Lung
May/June pp.224-225
McConnell (1997) How to determine gastric pH Nursing Times Vol. 27 No. 8 pp. 126
Metheny N, Reed L, Worseck M, Clark J (1993) How to aspirate fluid for small bore feeding tubes
American Journal of Nursing Vol. 93 No. 5 pp. 86-88
Neumann M, Meyer C, Dutton J, Smith R (1995) Hold that x-ray: Aspirate pH and auscultation
prove enteral tube placement Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Vol. 20 No. 4 pp. 293-295
Nottingham Acute Trusts (2003) Working in New Ways Policy and Guidelines Nottingham: NAT
Sobotka L (Ed) (2000) Basics in clinical nutrition 2nd Edition Prague: Galen
25
Method of insertion
The type of tube used (Manufacturers name and batch number)
How position of the tube has been confirmed
How the tube is secured internally
How the tube has been secured at the skin
At what level the tube has been secured at the skin
If there is more than one port, how these can be identified
Any variance to standard insertion protocol and the reason for it
28
ADMINISTERING FEED
A) NASOGASTRIC FEEDING
Nasogastric feeding is usually administered via a pump as this ensures feeding at a slow steady rate
with greater accuracy. A pump also assists passage of a viscous solution through a fine-bore tube.
Pumps should only be used by health care professionals who have the relevant knowledge and
competency in their use and care.
Commercially prepared feed should normally be used as it reduces the risk of infection (Anderton,
1995). Feed packs should be stored unopened at room temperature as feeds that are warmed are more
likely to become contaminated with harmful pathogens (Jones, 1982). Details of the feed to be used
for your patient will be given on enteral feeding regimen prepared by the dietitian. (Emergency starter
regimen is available in appendix 3 if required)
Rationale
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
To commence feeding
Rationale
1.
30
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Record the
date and time;
feed type;
volume
feed expiry time
patients name and number
on the additive labels and fix to all the reservoir
bottles.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
To ensure sterility.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
22.
To commence feeding
23.
24.
21.
32
Rationale
1.
2.
Wash hands
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
To ensure sterility.
33
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
To commence feeding
20.
21.
34
B) JEJUNAL FEEDING
ADMINISTRATION OF COMMERCIALLY PREPARED FEED USING A FEEDING
PUMP
Details of the feed to be used for your patient will be given on enteral feeding regimen prepared by
the dietitian. (see appendix 3 for emergency starter regimen if required)
ONLY USE STERILE WATER AND STERILE JUGS WHEN DEALING WITH
JEJUNAL TUBES
Table 6: Administering commercially prepared feed via jejunal tube
Principle
Rationale
Equipment Required:
Feeding regimen
Appropriate feed pack, check pack size to be
used
Feeding pump
Drip stand
Suitable giving set
50ml purple enteral syringe x 2
Sterile Jug
Sterile water
1.
2.
Wash hands
3.
4.
5.
35
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
36
17.
18.
19.
Rationale
2.
Wash hands
3.
5.
7.
8.
9.
10.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
11.
19.
38
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
39
2.
Rationale
The tube can become dislodged, increasing the risk
of aspiration.
Establishing the correct position of the tube in the
stomach is essential to the safety of the patient, as
intrapulmonary feeding or aspiration owing to a
poorly positioned tube can have serious
consequences (Cannaby et al, 2002).
To prevent blocking NG tube and to maintain
hydration.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Rationale
A smaller syringe may produce too much pressure
and split the tube (BAPEN, 2003).
2.
3.
Medicines (Refer to Separate Guideline on The use of syringes to administer flushes, feeds and medication
via the oral and enteral route in adults currently in preparation)
Principle
Rationale
1.
2.
3.
4.
Best Practice
Tubes which are not flushed immediately before and after feed and/or medication have a much higher risk of
blocking (Brennan Krupp and Heximar, 1998; Adams, 1994).
41
REFERENCES
Adams (1994) Administration of drugs through a jejunostomy tube British Journal of Intensive Care
Vol. No. pp. 10-17
Anderton A (1995) Reducing bacterial contamination in enteral tube feeds British Journal of Nursing
Vol. 4 No 7 pp 368-376
Anderton A (2000) Microbial Contamination of Enteral Tube Feed: How can we reduce the risk?
London: Nutricia Clinical Care
BAPEN (2003) Administering drugs via enteral feeding tubes - a practical guide London:
Brennan Krupp K and Heximer B (1998) Going with the flow Nursing. Vol. 28 No. 4.
Cannaby N, Evans L, Freeman A (2002) Nursing care of patients with nasogastric feeding tubes
British Journal of Nursing Vol. 11 No. 6 pp. 366-372
Colagiovanni L (1999) Taking the tube Nursing Times. Vol. 95, No. 21 pp. 63-71
Colagiovanni L (2000) Preventing and clearing blocked feeding tubes Nursing Times Vol. 96 No 17
pp. 3-4
Jacobs S, Chang R W, Lee B, Bartlett F W (1990) Continuous Feeding - A Major cause of
Pneumonia in the Ventilated ITU Patient Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Vol. 14, No 4,
pp 353-356
Jones E (1982) Nursing Aspects of Tube Feeding Nursing Vol. 12 No. 4 pp34-47
Hamilton H (2000) Total Parenteral nutrition - a practical guide for nurses London:
Marcuard and Perkins (1988) Clogging of feeding tubes Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Vol. 12 No.4 pp. 403 - 405
Medical Devices Agency (2000) The re-use of medical devices supplied for single-use only MDA
DB9501 London: HMSO
Rollins H (1997) A nose for trouble Nursing Times Nutrition Supplement. Vol. 93 No 49
Shaw J (1994) A worrying gap in knowledge - Nurses knowledge of enteral feeding practice
Professional Nurse July, pp. 656-661
Sobotka L (Ed) (2000) Basics in clinical nutrition 2nd Edition Prague: Galen
St Georges Healthcare Trust (2000) Procedure for the insertion and placement of Naso-Gastri Tubes:
Adult Fine-Bore London: St Georges
42
Tait, (2001) Going Nasogastric Current thinking in Nasogastric Techniques Complete Nutrition
Vol 1 No. 2
Taylor S, Goodinson-McLaren S M (1992) Nutritional Support - A Team Approach. London: Wolfe
Publishing
Ward V, Wilson J, Taylor L, Cookson B, Glyns A (1997) Preventing Hospital Acquired Infection.
Public Health Laboratory Service, London.
GASTROSTOMY TUBE
CARE OF A PATIENT WITH A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY
(PEG)
Table 9: IMMEDIATE CARE POST-PROCEDURE
Principle
Rationale
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
43
Table 10: Pump feeding using agreed feeding pump and giving set
Principle
Rationale
1.i)
1.
2.
Wash hands.
3.
If there is still any doubt that the tube is not in the correct
position, do not use. Check with medical staff or the
Nutrition Support team.
4.
44
5.
Check feed labels to ensure feed type and expiry dates are
correct.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Open the pump door and place the giving set in the pump
and then close the door.
11.
12.
Now you need to set the rate of the infusion and then the
total volume to be infused. First set the rate to be infused:
Check the feeding regime for the intended rate of feed.
Press the (+) or (-) buttons to set this rate, in mls per hour on
the pump
Now set the total volume to be infused:
Press the DOSE = VOL button and the pump will read
CONT, then press the (+) to set the volume to be infused
13.
14.
15.
Remove the cap from the giving set. Connect the end of the
giving set to the gastrostomy tube and then press
START/STOP button to commence feeding
16.
45
17.
18.
19.
20.
Best Practice
Principle
1 ii)
Rationale
1.
46
2.
Wash hands
3.
To prevent aspiration.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Screw giving set tightly to the feed pack and spike taking
care not to touch the sterile foil end of the feed pack.
10.
11.
Open the pump door and place the giving set in the pump
and then close the door.
12.
13.
Now you need to set the rate of the infusion and then the
total volume to be infused. First set the rate to be infused:
Check the feeding regime for the intended rate of feed. Press
the (+) or (-) buttons to set this rate, in mls per hour on the
pump
14.
15.
47
16.
Screw giving set tightly to the feed pack and spike taking
care not to touch the sterile foil end of the feed pack.
17.
Remove the cap from the giving set. Connect the end of the
giving set to the gastrostomy tube and then press
START/STOP button to commence feeding
18.
19.
20.
21.
Rationale
Equipment Required
Feeding regimen
Appropriate feed e.g. bottle, can or cartons
50ml purple enteral syringe x 2
Clean jug (to measure feed)
Jug and fresh drinking tap water for flushing
1.
2.
Wash hands.
3.
To prevent aspiration.
4.
Flush feeding tube before and after feeding, before and after
medication and as per feeding regimen.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
49
Best Practice
Best Practice
SYRINGES
Only use 50ml purple enteral syringes with enteral feeding tubes, smaller syringes may produce too
much pressure and split the tube (BAPEN, 2003). Do not use syringes intended for intravenous use
due to the risk of accidental parenteral administration.(BAPEN 2003) (NPSA 2007)
Best Practice
WEEKLY WEIGHING
As a general rule, all patients having gastrostomy feeds should be weighed at least weekly to monitor
nutritional status and signs of over/under hydration. Weighing more frequently may be advised. Ask
medical staff, Nutrition Support team or dietitian. When weighing, the same set of scales should be
used to main consistency
Rationale
1.
To reduce infection.
50
2.
To avoid infection
6.
To maintain hygiene.
7.
8.
9.
10.
51
Rationale
1.
2.
4.
5.
to use a sterile Foley catheter of the same size as a temporary replacement. It should be inserted by a
doctor or registered nurse competent in the procedure. This should not be used until the device is
changed to a feeding tube and the position is confirmed. www.mhra.gov.uk
Replacement of the gastrostomy tube or temporary insertion of a Foley catheter should take place no
longer than 4 hours following accidental removal and the Nutrition Support team informed as soon as
possible. After approximately 8 - 12 hours, the stoma will have started to close, and the patient may
require a further invasive procedure to replace the tube.
NB: When the gastrostomy tube is removed within three weeks of placement the stoma tract
may not have formed and there is a risk of free gastric perforation and peritonitis. Medical
advice should be sought immediately should this occur. RE-INSERTION OF A TEMPORARY
TUBE MUST NOT BE ATTEMPTED.
Rationale
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Best Practice
MEDICATION
53
Although the use of unlicensed medication or medication via unlicensed routes is not encouraged,
there are many occasions when it is the only option. It is vital, however, to first seek the advice of a
pharmacist to identify other routes of administration or, if unavoidable, the best possible preparation
for gastrostomy administration. (Refer To Separate Guideline On Drug Administration via Tubes
and Stomas)
Best Practice
MEDICINES
REFERENCES
BAPEN (2003) Administering drugs via enteral feeding tubes - a practical guide London: Bapen
Colagiovanni L (2000) Preventing and clearing blocked feeding tubes Nursing Times Vol. 96 No 17
Faller N. A, Lawrence K. G, Ferraro C.B. (1993) Gastrostomy, replacement, feeding tubes: the long
and the short of it Ostomy & Wound Management Jan/Feb. pp 26 33
Grant J. P. (1993) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy Ann of surgery Vol 217 No 2 pp 168 174
Grant M (2000) Delivery of enteral nutrition Advanced Practice in Acute Clinical Care Vol. 1 No. 4
Larson D.E., Burton D.D., Schroeder K.W., Di Magno E.P (1987) Percutaneous endoscopic
gastrostomy. Indications, successes, complications and mortality in 314 consecutive patients Journals
of Gastroenterology Vol. 93 No. 1 pp. 48-52
Marcuard and Perkins (1988) Clogging of feeding tubes Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Vol. 12 No.4 pp. 403 - 405
Nottingham Acute Trusts (2003) Working in New Ways Policy and Guidelines Nottingham: NAT
Scanlan & Frisch (1992) Nasoduodenal feeding tubes: prevention of occlusion Journal of
Neurosurgical Nursing Vol. 24 No. 5 pp. 256-259
Sobotka L (Ed) (2000) Basics in clinical nutrition 2nd Edition Prague: Galen
So J.B. & Ackroyd F.W. (1998) Experience of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy at
Massachusetts General Hospital. Indicators and complications. Sinapore Medical Journal Vol. 39
No. 12 pp. 560-563
54
JEJUNAL FEEDING
Once the jejunal feeding tube has been inserted the principles of caring for a patient receiving jejunal
feeding, either NJ or jejunostomy are very similar to NG and gastrostomy care respectively. The
dietitians will normally have prescribed a starter regimen (see appendix 3 for emergency starter
regimen if required). Ensure that this is available and used.
It is not possible to aspirate jejunal contents to confirm position so it is essential that the length of the
tube at the nose or skin is recorded and checked. If these tubes migrate so that the level of the tube has
changed at the nose/skin, the tubes should not be used for feeding and the tubes should not be
removed, unless the patient is in distress, until an expert opinion is sought.
Table 15: Care of patients with jejunal feeding
Principle
1.
Tube Type
When a tube is placed record:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Rationale
Tube Position
Immediately after the tube has been placed, record the
length of tube that is visible at the nose or skin by using
the markers on the tube, or by measuring and marking the
tube using a permanent marker.
Document this length in patient record.
b)
3.
a)
Fixation
Nasojejunal
Renew tape fixing a nasojejunal tube to the cheek and
neck daily (Burns et al 1995 cited in Bengmark, 1998).
Do not secure at nose as this could cause the tube to loop
in patients mouth.
b)
Jejunostomy
Sutures that secure jejunostomy tubes should not be
removed unless indicated by the surgeon who placed the
tube. Sutures which grow out may need replacing.
55
c)
Jejunostomy/PEGJ
The position of external fixation plates on jejunostomy
and gastro-jejunostomy tubes should be maintained close
the skin but not tight. It should be positioned next to the
skin with approximately 1cm or little finger space
between the skin and fixation device.
4
a)
Feeding
Only commence feeding via the tube when the doctor has
specified in the patients medical notes that the tube is in
the correct position.
Always refer to feeding regime.
b)
c)
e)
Best Practice
DUMPING SYNDROME
Unlike enteral feeding into the stomach, intermittent feeding into the jejunum may cause Dumping
Syndrome (rapid dilution of hypertonic intestinal fluid which may cause hypovolaemia and
sympathetic vasomotor responses) sweating, tachycardia, electrocardiograph changes, weakness and
abdominal pain (Holmes, 1996).
Principle
5.
a)
Rationale
To reduce risk of rupturing the tube
(Shaw, 1994) and risk of crossinfection (Rollins, 1995).
56
b)
c)
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
Best Practice
FLUSHING THE TUBE
In the published evidence (Bengmark, 1998; Brennan Krupp and Heximer, 1998), tubes which are not
flushed immediately before and after feeds and/or medication have a much higher risk of blocking.
Sterile water is used because the acid barrier in the stomach is being bypassed.
Refer to local guidelines. Use most cost effective method.
Best Practice
SYRINGES
50 ml syringes should be used. A smaller syringe may produce too much pressure and split the tube
(BAPEN 2003). Shaw (1994) found that small syringes are more likely to cause tubes to rupture.
Greater pressure can be exerted using a small syringe therefore only syringes of 30ml or greater should
be used. Do not use syringes intended for intravenous use due to the risk of accidental parenteral
administration.(BAPEN 2003) (NPSA 2007)
Best Practice
SINGLE EQUIPMENT USE ONLY
Re-use of single use only items contravenes the Medical Devices Agency Regulations (1995). Rollins
(1995) demonstrated that single use items reduced the risk of infection; this is backed up by advice
from the Public Health Laboratory Service (Ward et al, 1997).
Principle
Rationale
6.
a)
b)
Jejunostomy/PEG
A new stoma should be treated as a surgical wound using
an aseptic technique.
Observe the patient for signs of complications e.g.
peritonitis, ileus.
7.
Medication
Principle
Rationale
a)
b)
c)
d)
Best Practice
MEDICATION
Although the use of unlicensed medication or medication via unlicensed routes is not encouraged,
there are many occasions when it the only option. It is vital, however, to first seek the advice of a
pharmacist to identify other routes of administration or, if unavoidable, the best possible preparation
for jejunal administration. (Refer To Separate Guideline On Use of syringes to administer flushes,
feeds and medication via the oral and enteral route in adults)
Best Practice
MEDICINES
Medications which must not be crushed include: Enteric Coated (EC). The coating is designed to
resist gastric acid to protect the drug and/ or reduce gastric side effects. Modified/slow Release (MR,
SR,LA,XL). These are tablets or capsules that are specifically designed to release the drug over a long
period of time. Crushing these will cause all the drug to be released at once and may cause toxic side
effects. Cytotoxics and hormones. These should not be crushed due to the risk of exposure from the
powdered drug.
Some Problem Drugs: Phenytoin,Digoxin and Carbamazepine Blood levels may be affected by
feeds; these should be checked regularly. It may be necessary to increase the dose. Antacids The metal
iron in the antacid binds to the protein in the feed and can block the tube. Consideration of an
alternative may be necessary. Penicillins Feed may reduce the absorption, a higher dose may be
needed. If possible stop the feed 1-hour before and 2 hours after administration. Other antibiotics
Levels of antibiotics such as Ciprofloxacin tetracyclines and rifampacin can be significantly reduced
by feed. Consider other alternatives. Always check with the pharmacist.
58
8.
Principle
a)
Rationale
The stoma made for a jejunostomy or gastrojejunostomy will close within hours of tube removal.
To save the stoma a new tube must be placed
IMMEDIATELY.
A suitable replacement feeding tube or Foley catheter
may be used in the short term to keep the stoma open.
This must be inserted by a competent practitioner and
the balloon filled with 5ml of sterile water only. This
should take place no longer than 2 hours following
accidental removal.
c)
9.
a)
b)
Removal of Tube
Nasojejunal
Flush tube with sterile water and remove in the same
way as a nasogastric tube.
Discard any unused water.
Jejunostomy/PEGJ
Ask for expert advice prior to removal of tube.
After tube removal the stoma will close within a few
hours.
59
REFERENCES
Adams D (1994) Administration of drugs through a jejunostomy tube. British Journal of Intensive
Care. January, pp 10 17.
Anderton A (1995) Reducing bacterial contamination in enteral tube feeds. British Journal of Nursing.
Volume 4, Number 7, pp 368 376.
Arrowsmith H (1996) Nursing management of patients receiving gastrostomy feeding. British Journal
of Nursing. Volume 4, Number 5, pp 268 273.
Bengmark S (1998) Progress in perioperative enteral tube feeding. Clinical Nutrition. Volume 17 pp
145 152.
Brennan Krupp K, Heximer B (1998) Going with the flow. Nursing. Volume 28, Number 4, pp 54
55.
Eisenberg P G (1994) Gastrostomy and jejunostomy tubes. Registered Nurse. November, pp 54 59.
Holmes S (1996) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a review. Nursing Times. Volume 92,
Number 17, pp 34 35.
Jeppsson B, Tranberg K G, Bengmark S (1992) Technical developments. A new self propelling
nasoenteric feeding tube. Clinical Nutrition. Volume 11, pp 373 375.
Medical Devices Agency (1995) The Reuse of Medical Devices Supplied for Single use only (MDA
DB 9501).
Naysmith M R, Nicholson J (1998) Nasogastric drug administration. Professional Nurse. Volume 13,
Number 7, pp 424 427.
Rollins H (1995) The re-use of flushing syringes in Enteral Feeding. Unpublished.
Shaw J (1994) A worrying gap in knowledge. Nurses knowledge of enteral feeding practice.
Professional Nurse. July, pp 656 661.
Ward V, Wilson J, Taylor L, Cookson B, Glyns A (1997) Preventing Hospital acquired infection.
Public Health Laboratory Service, London.
Carr C S, Ling K D E, Boulos P, Singer M (1996) Randomised trial on safety and efficacy of
immediate postoperative enteral feeding patients undergoing gastrointestinal resection. British
Medical Journal. Volume 312, pp 869 871.
McKinlay J, Anderton A, Wood W, Gould I M (1995) Endogenous bacterial contamination of enteral
tube feeding systems during administration of feeds to hospital patients. Journal for Human Nutrition
and Dietetics. Volume 8, pp 3 8.
60
61
Best Practice
All patients with new onset diarrhoea must
Be barrier nursed and have
Stool sent for culture and sensitivity and Clostridium Difficile Toxin
Simultaneous use of other drugs, particularly antibiotics, is usually the cause of apparent enteral tube
feeding related diarrhoea. Other medications which can cause diarrhoea include: laxatives, H2
blockers, proton pump inhibitors, antiarrhythmics, antihypertensives and non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Medications containing magnesium, such as antacids, and drugs containing active
fillers, such as sorbitol, can also contribute to the development of diarrhoea. Therefore, medications
should always be reviewed and adjusted if possible.
Other causes of enteral tube feeding related diarrhoea include infection, with Clostridium Difficile
being found in 20-50% of patients with antibiotic related diarrhoea. Stool cultures should be sent for
culture and sensitivity to rule out an infective cause. Bacterial feed contamination can also cause
gastrointestinal related problems and so it is vital to prevent microbial contamination when setting up
enteral feeds, by using closed enteral feeding systems whenever possible and following guidance when
setting up enteral feeds (Guideline for the care of patients receiving NG/PEG/Jejunal feeding).
The enteral feed per se is rarely the cause of enteral feeding related diarrhoea. In some situations a too
rapid feed rate may contribute to the development of diarrhoea, particularly in patients receiving
jejunal feeding. In patients receiving long term enteral feeding there may be some benefit in reviewing
the type of feed as fibre containing formulae can sometimes improve stool form. If other causes, as
described above, have been excluded then the dietitian should be contacted at the earliest opportunity
to consider changes to the enteral feeding regimen.
In all situations it is vital to monitor the amount, frequency and type of diarrhoea using a Bristol Stool
Chart. Fluid balance should be monitored very carefully to prevent dehydration, particularly in those
patients producing large volumes of watery stools. Additional IV fluids may be required. Electrolytes
should also be monitored and correction considered. Anti-diarrhoeal agents could be considered once
it is known that the cause of diarrhoea is non-infective.
In a patient with enteral tube feeding diarrhoea,
Standard management should include monitoring stool type, frequency and volume on a stool
chart and overall fluid balance, hydration status and electrolyte levels.
IV fluid replacement should be given if required.
Stool samples should be sent off for MC&S and C.Difficile toxin
Table 16: Management of enteral feeding related diarrhoea
If stool sample +ve
If stool sample -ve
Treat according to Guideline for infection
Review medications consider altering or
stopping:
Laxatives
Drugs with side-effect of diarrhoea including
o Antibiotics, H2 blockers, PPIs,
antiarrhythmics, antihypertensives
and NSAIDs
o Drugs containing active fillers e.g.
sorbitol
Consider specific gastrointestinal causes and seek
help from the NST
If no cause can be identified use anti-diarrhoeals
But NEVER use antidiarrhoeal agents in patients
with infective or bloody diarrhoea
62
63
REFERENCES
Bowling T. Nutritional Support for Adults and Children A handbook for hospital practice 2004.
The Burdett Institute of Gastrointestinal Nursing Enteral Tube Feeding Guidelines
National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care, February 2006. Nutrition support in adults: Oral
nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition
Stroud M, Duncan H, Nightingale J. Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut
2003; 52 (suppl. VII); vii1 vii12
64
65
Patients being discharged out of Nottinghamshire: Local health care professionals will be
contacted about arrangements for future care unless alternative arrangements have been
agreed.
If the patients GP is in Nottingham City or Nottinghamshire County PCT or GPs from the
former Rushcliffe, Broxtowe and Hucknall and Gedling PCTs no prescription is required for
feed.
66
If there is agreement to follow up an out of area patient, the GP should be contacted to request
a prescription for feed.
The managing dietitian, if different, will retain the dietetic records, including brief discharge
summary.
67
APPENDIX 1
NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL NHS TRUST
CLINICAL GUIDELINES
Title of Guideline: ADULT CRITICAL CARE ENTERAL FEEDING
GUIDELINES
Date First Issued: September 2009
Version: 1
Document Derivation:
Consultation Process:
Sr Illsley
Distribution:
This guideline has not yet been fully ratified and registered with the Trust. However,
clinical guidelines are guidelines only. The interpretation and application of clinical
guidelines will remain the responsibility of the individual clinician. If in doubt contact
a senior colleague or expert. Caution is advised when using the guidelines after the
review date.
68
Nasojejunal tubes (NJTs) are an alternative feeding route. These can be inserted by the
gastroenterology team on the unit under sedation. At the QMC Campus a consultant may
pass an NJT at the bedside. Endoscopic placement of an NJT is usually feasible. The
Nutrition Team at either campus will be able to facilitate such a request. For some GI and
hepatobiliary surgical patients, a feeding jejunostomy may be placed in theatre. PEG tubes
are not commonly used in Critical Care but may be inserted in those requiring long term
gastric tube feeding.
Patients for whom the enteral route is not suitable or successful, parenteral nutrition should
be considered. There will be some occasions when nutrition needs to be delivered by more
than one route.
POSSIBLE CONTRA-INDICATIONS TO COMMENCING FEEDING
Various factors should be considered when the making the decision about when and by
which route(s) to start feeding. These include the following:
Has the patient got a functioning gut?
What is the patients nutritional status?
Is the patient surgical or medical? If they are a surgical patient it is worth noting that
small bowel motility usually returns within 12 hours after an operation.
Did the surgery involve the gastro-intestinal tract?
Was the surgery an elective or an emergency procedure? An elective patient will be
metabolically different to an emergency patient. Generally an elective post-op patient
will be more stable than an emergency post-op patient.
What are the possible routes for commencing nutrition e.g. was a feeding
jejunostomy tube inserted in theatre?
Absolute contra-indications to enteral feeding
There are some absolute contra-indications to enteral feeding these include:
Obstructed bowel
Ileus
Proximal gut fistulae
Relative contra-indications to enteral feeding
There are also relative contra-indications to feeding these include:
When the patient has been assessed and felt able to resume adequate oral feeding,
eg after extubation
Upper GI surgery (proximal to the DJ flexure) NG feeding may be contra-indicated,
consider jejunal feeding.
Upper GI anastomotic leak/ perforation (proximal to the mid-jejunum)
Distal small bowel and colon fistulae may occasionally require parenteral support liaise with surgeons and Nutrition Team for advice
Insufficient working bowel / small bowel disease with possible failure to absorb/ short
bowel liaise with Nutrition Team for advice.
Caution is required for patients receiving non-invasive BiPAP/ CPAP via a full face
mask. If this method of respiratory support is needed only for a short period of time
(e.g. a few days it is considered safest not to NG feed as there could be an
increased risk of aspiration with gastric distension). If this type of respiratory support
is needed for more than a few days in a malnourished patient or for more than 7-10
days in a well nourished patient, an alternative to NG feeding should be considered
e.g. NJ feeding or TPN if NJT placement is not possible.
70
REFEEDING SYNDROME
This is defined as the severe fluid and electrolyte shifts and related metabolic implications in
malnourished patients undergoing refeeding, either by the oral, enteral or parenteral route.
Patients at particular risk include those with cancer, anorexia nervosa and alcohol
dependency. If the patient is identified as being at risk of refeeding, seek medical advice
before commencing feed. Please the Trust guidelines on Refeeding for further details.
STARTING THE FEEDING
If the decision has been made to commence NG feeding, use protocols for Level 2 and Level
3 patients on pages 72 & 73. Please use these guides in association with the Trust
guidelines on Enteral Feeding
The giving sets should only be changed every 24 hours. Label the giving set with the date
and time when they are due to be changed.
Enteral feeding has now been standardised to feed patients continuously over 24 hours.
This is to allow tight glycaemic control. Intermittent feeding regimens can lead to hyper- and
hypo-glycaemic episodes12,13. For the same reason it is advised to avoid prolonged feeding
breaks during drug administration via feeding tubes. However, enteral feed may interact with
certain drugs when these are administered via feeding tubes. For further guidance discuss
this with a pharmacist.
NG feeding for level 2 patients
A fine bore Flocare NG tube should be used to provide the access for the feed unless
advised otherwise by the patients parent team. If a fine bore NG tube is inserted the patient
cannot have their gastric residual volumes checked.
The enteral feeding regimen is individualised for each patient by the critical care dietitian.
Outside of the dietitians working hours nasogastric feeding can be built up as shown in
Figure 1:
NG feeding for level 3 patients
A 14Fr Salem Sump NG tube should be used to provide the access for the feed. Level 3
patients will have their gastric residual volumes (GRVs) checked six hourly. Increasing the
designated GRV from 200ml to 400ml has been shown not to increase the risk of aspiration14
and also accounts for the stomachs intrinsic secretions.
The enteral feeding regimen is individualised for each patient by the critical care dietitian.
Outside of the dietitians working hours NG feeding can be built up as shown in Figure 2.
71
Yes
Increase feed by 25ml/hr to a rate
of 50ml/hr* for 24 hours
Yes
Increase feed by 25ml/hr to a rate
of 75ml/hr* for 24 hours or the
final feeding rate as stated in the
Dietitians regimen.
No
Consider possible reasons for
intolerance and liaise with
medical staff/ dietitian
Yes
Continue at final feeding rate.
*NB If the patients weight is less than 60kg keep the feed rate at 50ml/h until the patient is
assessed by the dietitian. If the patients weight is less than 40kg keep the feed rate at
25ml/h until the patient is assessed by the dietitian.
72
No
Return any gastric residual volume and increase rate by 25ml/hr every 6
hours until a rate of 75ml/h* or the final feeding rate as stated in the
dietitians regimen is reached.
Replace 400ml
and continue
feed at 25ml/hr
Repeat aspirate after 6 hours. Is the gastric residual volume greater than 400ml?
Yes
No
When full rate is established, Aspirate NGT 6 hourly
*NB If the patients weight is less than 60kg keep the feed rate at 50ml/h until the patient is
assessed by the dietitian. If the patients weight is less than 40kg keep the feed rate at
25ml/h until the patient is assessed by the dietitian.
Erythromycin cautions:
Care if patient pro-arrhythmogenic or receiving Amiodarone. IV Erythromycin is contra-indicated in patient receiving
IV or oral amiodarone. Oral erythromycin may be administered alternatively but may not be effective due to poor
absorption.
Risk of QT-prolongation when co-administered with Imidazole anti-fungal agents e.g. Fluconazole.
Risk of myopathy or rhabdomyolysis if Erythromycin co-administered with statins: withhold Atorvastatin and
Simvastatin while patient receives Erythromycin.
15
Erythromycin also may increase benzodiazepine levels monitor sedation closely .
#
Metoclopramide cautions:
Dopamine antagonist - Metoclopramide will be ineffective if patient is on dopamine or dopexamine.
Avoid in young patients under the age of 20 years and in patients with Parkinsons Disease.
73
No
Return to the start of the level 3
flowchart on page 73. Stop prokinetics if the patient has
tolerated the feed at full rate for
24 hrs
Yes
Consider possible reasons (see
tolerance to feed information below)
and re-assess after another 24 hrs
No
Return to the start of the level 3 flowchart on
page 73. Stop prokinetics if the patient has
tolerated the feed at full rate for 24 hrs
Yes
Continue prokinetics, stop the feed
and contact the Nutrition Team to
consider nasojejunal tube or other
alternative feeding routes
TOLERANCE TO FEED
Several parameters should be monitored to assess tolerance to feed.
Large or increasing gastric residual volumes/ regurgitation of feed / nausea/
vomiting
- Has anything changed? Recheck the contra-indications for NG feeding
- Is the patient receiving sedatives, opioids or inotropes/vasopressors (e.g.
noradrenaline, adrenaline, dopamine)? These will decrease gut motility could these
infusions be reduced or stopped?
- Is the rest of the gut working? Consider if bowels have opened or if the
stoma is functioning? Could the patient have an ileus or a bowel obstruction?
- Is the patient supine? Could the patient be repositioned into the semirecumbent position at 30- 45?
- Recheck the position of the feeding tube.
- If a fine bore NG tube is in situ consider changing this to a wide bore.
- Consider starting prokinetics if this has not already been done.
- NB nausea and vomiting can be related to a range of factors not just GI function.
Abdominal distension
- Consider possible ileus
- Is the patient constipated? Treat if possible see Guidelines for the
use of Laxatives
- If a fine bore NGT is insitu consider changing this to a wide bore.
Diarrhoea
- This may be caused by medications (especially antibiotics), an infection or
be disease related.
- Review medications (especially antibiotics) and send a stool sample.
- If stools are watery consider the possibility of overflow diarrhoea.
74
USE OF LAXATIVES
Enteral nutrition commenced at prescribed rate
Bowels
open > twice
a day or
very loose
refer to
doctor or
pharmacist
Bowels
open > three
times a day
or very
loose refer
to doctor or
pharmacist
75
REFERENCES
1. Green, CJ et al (1995). Energy and nitrogen balance and changes in mid-upper arm
circumferences with multiple organ failure. Nutrition 11(6);739-746.
2. Streat et al (l987). Aggressive nutritional support does not prevent protein loss despite fat
gain in septic intensive care patients. Journal of Trauma 27(3);262-266.
3. Mault 2000, Dempsey et al (1988). Shukla et al (1985), Chandra (1983), Robinson et al
(1987) cited in Barr et al (2004) Outcomes in Critically ill patients before and after the
implementation of an evidence based nutritional management protocol. Chest 125;14461457.
4. Marik, PE, Zaloga, GP. (2001) Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic
review. Crit Care Med 29;2264-2270
5. Lewis, SJ, Egger, M, Sylvester, PA et al (2001) Early enteral feeding versus nil by mouth
after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ
323;1-5
6. Neumayer, LA, Smout, RJ, Horn, HG, et al (2001). Early and sufficient feeding reduces
length of stay and charges in surgical patients J Surg Res 95;73-77
7. Gramlich, L et al. (2004) Does enteral nutrition compared to parenteral nutrition result in
better outcomes in critically ill adult patients? A systematic review of the literature. Nutrition
20(10):843-848.
8. Moore, FA, Feliciano, DV, Andrassy, RJ (1992) Early enteral feeding, compared with
parenteral, reduces postoperative septic complications. Annuals of Surgery 216:172-83.
9. Frost, P and Bihari, D (1997) The route of nutritional support in the critically ill:
physiological and economical considerations. Nutrition 13(9 suppl):S58-63.
10. Braga, M, Gianotti, L, Gentilini, O, Parisi, V, Salis, C, Di Carlo, V. (2001). Early
postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reduces costs compared with
total parenteral nutrition. Critical Care Medicine 29:242-248
11. Braunschweig, CL et al (2001). Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a metaanalysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 74:534-42.
12. Van den Berghe, G, Wouters, P, Bouillon, R et al (2003) Outcome benefit of intensive
insulin therapy in the critically ill: Insulin dose versus glycaemic control. Crit Care Med
31(2);359-366
13. Turner, P, Harper, J, Breen, A, Shenkin, A. (2004) The importance of 24hour enteral
feeding in achieving tight glycaemic control in critically patients. BAPEN Abstract
14. McClave, SA, Lukan, JK, Stefater JA, Lowen CC, Looney, SW, Matheson, PJ, Gleeson,
K, Spain, DA (2005). Poor validity of residual volumes as a marker of aspiration in critically ill
patients. Critical Care Medicine 33:324-330
15. Baxter K, Stockley IH, Sweetman SS; Stockleys Drug Interactions accessed via
Medicines Complete at www.medicinescomplete.com April 2009
16. Nguyen NQ, Chapman M, Fraser RJ, Bryant LK, Burgstad C, Holloway RH; Prokinetic
therapy for feed intolerance in critical illness: one drug or two? Crit Care Med 2007 (35):
2561-2567
17. Booth CM, Heyland DK, Paterson WG; Gastrointestinal promotility drugs in the critical
care setting: A systematic review of the evidence; Crit Care Med 2002 (30): 1429-1435.
18. Grant K, Thomas R; Prokinetic drugs in the intensive care unit: reviewing the evidence;
JICS 2009 (10): 34-37
76
APPENDIX 2
Document Derivation:
Consultation Process:
Ratified by:
Distribution:
This guideline has been registered with the Trust. However, clinical guidelines are
guidelines only. The interpretation and application of clinical guidelines will remain
the responsibility of the individual clinician. If in doubt contact a senior colleague or
expert. Caution is advised when using the guidelines after the review date.
77
This is possible, e.g. with a Ryles tube, but in general is not recommended as:
It can be very uncomfortable for the patients
Has increased risk of complications
Can cause oesophageal erosions
For guidance on feeding via a nasogastric tube please refer to the Trusts Enteral Feeding
Guidelines.
If a patient is being fed by wide-bore tube in a critical care area, on discharge to the
general ward if nasogastric feeding needs to be continued without need for gastric
aspiration, this should be exchanged for a fine-bore tube on arrival to the ward.
78
79
Rationale
Arrange a signal by which the patient can To give the patient a sense of control, gain
communicate if she/he wants to stop the procedure, their co-operation and to ensure the safe
for example, by raising their hand.
passing of the tube.
Ask the patient to sniff with one nostril and then the To check if the nostrils are clear and to
other or to blow their nose. If needed, clean the identify any obstruction, which may hamper
nostrils before commencing the procedure.
the procedure.
Sit the patient in an upright position, with head well The patients natural inclination is to move
supported and with the chin 90 to the neck, unless backwards away from the tube.
contra-indicated.
A 90 angle helps to close the glottis,
protecting the airway (McConnell, 1997).
5.
To facilitate procedure.
Measure the length of tube required by placing the To ensure the appropriate length of tube is
end of the tube at the patients xiphisternum and passed into the stomach.
measure the distance from here to the bridge of the
nose and then from the nose to the earlobe. Note the
mark on the tube.
Dip the distal end of the tube into the water or thinly
coat up to 15-20cm of the distal end of the tube water
soluble jelly Give mouthcare or offer the patient a
drink if able to swallow.
Carefully insert the distal end of the tube into the To facilitate passage of the tube by following
clearest nostril and slide slowly along the floor of the the natural anatomy of the nose.
nasopharynx.
As the tube passes down into the nasopharynx, ask A swallowing action closes the glottis,
the patient to start sipping water and swallowing (if enabling the tube to pass into the oesophagus
able).
and reduces the risk of it entering the
trachea.(Groher 1997)
80
11
12
13
14
Anchor the tube securely in position. If possible, a To secure the tube and determine tube
commercial attacher should be used.
position.
Document the exact position (cm length) at the nostril
of the tube in the appropriate record.
Verify tube position see Table 2
xray
only
if
this
is
not
81
Rationale
To establish the position of the tube.
A pH value of 5.5 or below. There are
no known reports of pulmonary
aspirates at or below this figure. NPSA
Safety Alert 2005)
The safest syringe size for flushing or
aspirating is a 50ml syringe as a smaller
syringe may produce too much pressure
and split the tube (BAPEN, 2003).
82
Nursing staff to commence feeding if instructed to do so. If To ensure prompt use of the tube.
being used for drainage, to connect the bile bag
Change patients
position and retry
Syringes
Note that syringes used in hospital are single use only. Only 50ml purple enteral
syringes are to be used for aspirating all nasogastric tubes. Please see (The use of
syringes to administer flushes, feeds and medication via the oral and enteral routes,
policy and procedures, 2007)
A tube position should be verified
Insertion of all new tubes
Tubes which have been re-inserted, repositioned or there is a suspicion of
displacement
All new admissions who have a nasogastric or orogastric tube insitu.
83
84
REFERENCES
British Association for Parental and Enteral Nutrition (2003) Administering drugs via enteral
feeding tubes - a practical guide London: BAPEN
Dougherty, L. Lister, S. (2008) The Royal Marsden Hospital Manual of Nursing Procedures
7th Ed. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford
Colagiovanni L (1999) Taking the tube Nursing Times Vol. 95, No. 21 pp. 63-71
Ellett MLC (2004) What is known about the method of correctly placing gastric tubes in adults
and children Gastroenterology Nursing 27(6):pp253-259
Fuchs, K and DeMeester, T (1990) Intragastric pH Pattern analysis in patients with
duodenogastric reflux Digestive Diseases 8(1):pp54-59
George-Gay, B and Chernecky, C (2001) Clinical Medical-Surgical Nursing: a DecisionMaking Reference Philadelphia: WB Saunders
Goodwin, RS (1996) Prevention of Aspiration Pneumonia: a Research Based Protocol
Critical Care Nursing 15(2):pp58-71
McConnell (1997) How to determine gastric pH Nursing Times Vol. 27 No. 8 pp. 126
Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (2004) Medical Device Alert Ref:
MDA/2004/026 London: MHRA
Metheny N, Reed L, Worseck M, Clark J (1993) How to aspirate fluid for small bore feeding
tubes American Journal of Nursing 93(5):pp86-88
Metheny, NA and Titler, MG (2001) Assessing placement of feeding tubes American Journal
of Nursing 103(3): pp36-45
Metheny NA, Wehrle MA, Wiersema L, Clark J (1998) Testing Feeding Tube Placement:
Auscultation vs pH Method American Journal of Nursing 98(5):pp37-42
Metheny N, Dettenmeier P, Hampton K, Wietsema L, Williams P (1990) Detection of
Inadvertent Respiratory Placement of Small Bore Feeding Tubes: a Report of 10 Cases
Heart and Lung Journal of Acute Critical Care 19(6):pp631-638
Neumann M, Meyer C, Dutton J, Smith R (1995) Hold that x-ray: Aspirate pH and
auscultation prove enteral tube placement Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Vol. 20 No.
4 pp. 293-295
NPSA (2005) Reducing the harm caused by misplaced nasogastric feeding tubes.
www.npssa.nhs.uk/alerts-and-directives/alerts/nasogastric-feeding-tubes.
National Patient Safety Agency (2007) Nasogastric Tube Incidents: Summary Update. NPSA
London
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (2008) Hand Hygiene Policy
Theodore AC, Frank JA, Ende J, Snider GL, Beer DJ (1984) Errant Placement of
Nasoenteric Tubes. A Hazard in Obtunded Patients Chest 86(6):pp931-933
85
APPENDIX 3
Consider additional IV fluids which may be required as feeding regimens below unlikely to meet fluid
requirements
Monitor blood sugar if the patient has diabetes. If blood sugars are greater than 11mmol/l or less than
4mmol/l on 3 separate occasions over 3 days please refer to diabetes nurse via HISS
Refer to Step 1 on next page to determine correct feeding regimen for your patient
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Regimen A-Severe risk
Water flushesgastric tubes =50ml before & after FEEDING, MEDICATION AND STOPPAGES
Jejunal tubes =50ml every 4 hours & before & after FEEDING, MEDICATION AND STOPPAGES
Day 1: Nutrison Standard 200ml over 20hours at 10 ml/hour
Do NOT proceed to day 2 until STEP 4 in flowchart overleaf followed
Day 2: Nutrison Standard 500mls over 20 hours at 25mls/hr
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Regimen B-Moderate/high risk
Water flushesgastric tubes =50ml before and after FEEDING, MEDICATION AND STOPPAGES
Jejunal tubes =50ml every 4 hours & before & after FEEDING, MEDICATION AND STOPPAGES
Day 1: Nutrison Standard 500ml over 20hours at 25 ml/hour
Do NOT proceed to day 2 until STEP 4 in flowchart overleaf followed
Day 2: Nutrison Standard 1000ml over 20hours at 50ml/hour
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Regimen C-Low risk
Water flushesgastric tubes =50ml before and after FEEDING, MEDICATION AND STOPPAGES
Jejunal tubes =50ml every 4 hours & before and after FEEDING, MEDICATION AND STOPPAGES
Day 1: Nutrison Standard 500ml over 20hours at 25 ml/hour
Day 2: Nutrison Standard 1000ml over 20hours at 50ml/hour
86
See Step 2
See Step 2
Start feeding
using:Regimen C
Low risk:
Yes
STEP 3b: Start enteral feeding
Follow appropriate feeding regimen overleaf
Start feeding
using:Regimen A
Severe risk
Start feeding
using:Regimen B
Moderate/high risk
Is K?3.0 and
Mg?0.5 and
PO4?0.5
Yes
At appropriate time increase to Day 2
Is K <3.0 and/or
Mg <0.5 and/or
PO4 <0.5
Yes
Keep the feed at the current rate.
Consider correcting the low electrolyte(s)
MONITORING the severely at risk Restore circulatory volume and monitor fluid balance and
overall clinical status closely. Monitor cardiac rhythm continually in these patients and any other
who develop cardiac arrhythmias (NICE 2006)
87
APPENDIX 4
CLINICAL NUTRITION NURSE SPECIALIST GASTROSTOMY CARE PATHWAY
PRE- PROCEDURE ASSESSMENT
Name
Hospital Number
Age
DOB
Admission Date
Ward
Date of Referral
Consultant
Date Seen
Is feeding appropriate? (If you answer yes to any of the questions in the next table you must
identify an acceptable clinical reason for going ahead with a feeding stoma as justification for
deviating from standard practice. Alternatively, the patient should be discussed with a clinical
nutrition consultant)
Patient is / has
Yes
No
If you answer yes justify reason for variance or
outcome of discussion with medical team
.. able to maintain their own nutrition?
.. a prognosis assessed to be<4 weeks?
.. a persistent vegetative state?
..inability to eat due only to advanced
dementing illness?
.. dysphagia due to debilitating,
progressive systemic illness?
Additional appropriateness comments
Signed
Date
Current Diagnosis:
Does the patient have significant respiratory disease? (on continuous O2 or shortness of breath at rest)
No
Yes
Does the patient have significant cardiac disease ? (uncontrolled heart failure or recent , < 6 weeks,
myocardial infarct)
No
Yes
88
Medication history: (If you answer Yes to any of the questions in this section, discuss with medical team to
plan anticoagulation / anti platelet management peri-procedure)
Is the patient taking anticoagulants/ antiplatelets?
Warfarin
No
Yes
Enoxaparin
No
Yes
Heparin
No
Yes
Aspirin
No
Yes
(Is S< required for this patient, if yes then suggest that a referral is made)
Consent
Can the patient consent for themselves
YES (explain procedure, leave the relevant consent form and
89
information pack with the patient and return 24 hours pre procedure
to pre-sign the form)
NO (if no identify reason here and
a) Leave Form 4 for responsible consultant to sign
b) Arrange to see relatives to give them the relevant information
pack
If NO has the appropriate consent been completed by the consultant
The procedure will not be carried out without the responsible consultants signature.
Consent Form 4 left / Instructions written in the medical notes
YES / NO
YES / NO
a) Therapeutic endoscopy
b) Procedure consent
c) Diabetes
d) Anticoagulation/antiplatelets
e) Mouthcare
f) No anterior abdominal wall SC fluids
48 hours pre procedure
Yes
No
Not relevant
90
APPENDIX 5
GUIDELINE & CARE-PATHWAY FOR SCREENING OF SWALLOWING IN
PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED / CONFIRMED STROKE
Introduction
The term dysphagia is used here to describe difficulties, which may occur in the oral and/or
pharyngeal stages of swallowing.
Studies have shown that between 30% - 40% of conscious stroke patients have significant impairment
of their swallow on the day of the stroke and 15% - 20% at one week post stroke (Wade et al 1987[1],
Barer 1989[2], Ellul et al 1993[3]). Patients with impaired swallow function are at risk of serious
complications such as aspiration and malnutrition (Davies with Barer 2001[4].) Hinchey, et al ( 2005)
[5]
reported that using a formal dysphagia screen resulted in a greater compliance with dysphagia
screening and significantly reduced the risk of pneumonia and concluded that a formal swallow
screening programme should be offered to all stroke patients, regardless of stroke severity. In addition,
Perry (2001)[6] noted that when a validated screening tool is used, significant benefits can be achieved
although Perry also noted that full training and education were required to achieve competency in
administering the screening tool and that this training was reflected in how accurate the tool was in
identifying dysphagia. There can be no doubt, then that early detection of dysphagia positively affects
the outcome of stroke (Smithard, at al, 1997)[7].
There are a number of guidelines recommending the use of screening for dysphagia in the first 24
hours as a quality marker for good care for stroke patients. These include; The National Service Framework for Older People[8], Standard 5: Stroke, states that
multidisciplinary assessment and rehabilitation must start within 24 hours and that this process
should include a formal swallowing assessment and a plan for safe hydration, feeding and
medication.
The Royal College of Physicians, National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke 3rd Edition, (based on
NICE Guidelines for stroke 2006), [9] supported by the National Stroke Strategy (QM8, 2007)
4.16.1 Recommendations
A* On admission, people with acute stroke should have their swallowing screened by an
appropriately trained healthcare professional before being given any oral foods, fluid or medication.
B* People with acute stroke for whom the admission screen indicates problems with swallowing
should have a specialist assessment of swallowing early after stroke. [The NICE group defined early
as within 24 hours if possible and no later than 72 hours after admission]
C* People with suspected aspiration on specialist assessment or who require tube feeding or dietary
modification for three days should then be reassessed and be considered for instrumental
examination.
D* People with acute stroke who are unable to take adequate nutrition and fluids orally should
receive early tube feeding with a nasogastric tube. [The NICE group defined early as within 24
hours of admission]
The care pathway for the assessment of swallowing following stroke therefore comprises a three-tier
approach (Farrell and ONeill 1999) [10]. The first tier consists of the Nurse Stroke Swallow Screen
that should be routinely carried out by trained staff on all patients suspected of having a stroke. The
second tier is an in-depth assessment by a specialist, usually a speech and language therapist, followed
by objective testing such as videofluoroscopy (VF)/ videopharyngography (VPG), if the first two tiers
do not provide enough information.
The standardised swallow screening tool in place in Nottingham, on which the Nurse Stroke Swallow
Screen was originally based was developed for non-specialists to detect dysphagia after stroke by
doctors and speech and language therapists in Manchester and Liverpool (Keeney and Hibberd 1997)
[11]
. It has since been adapted to include the 3-oz water sip test (De Pippo et al, 1992) [12]to improve
its sensitivity in detecting patients at risk of aspiration (Suiter and Leder, 2007) [13].
91
A working in new ways package has been developed. This package is designed to provide nurses
working within the inpatient Stroke Service with a competency framework to acquire the knowledge
and skills necessary for the safe and effective administration of a swallow screen for patients with a
confirmed/ suspected diagnosis of stroke. The development of this skill is underpinned by a
comprehensive training programme including the attendance at a study session, observed clinical
practice sessions, which will be supported by a portfolio of evidence, including reflective accounts and
witness statements.
The Nurse Stroke Swallow Screen is designed for staff to identify dysphagia using the validated
screening tool and therefore staff who undertake this training programme are fulfilling the role of a
Foundation Dysphagia Practitioner as specified by the Interprofessional Dysphagia Framework.[14]
This level of practitioner is directly linked to the Skills for Health Competence DYS 1: Undertake a
protocol-guided swallowing assessment, as well NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework (October
2004) [15] Dimension: Health and well-being HWB6 & 7 - Interventions and treatments Level 2
Equipment
Mouth care kit
Glass of water
Teaspoon
Tongue depressor if available
Pen torch
Screening proforma
Principle
Rationale
1.
92
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
References
1. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R. Motor loss and swallowing difficulty after stroke: frequency,
recovery, and prognosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 1987;76:50-54.
94
2. Barer D,H. The natural history and functional consequences of dysphagia after hemispheric
stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989 Feb;52(2):236-41.
3. Ellul J., Barer D. & the North West Dysphagia Study Group. Detection and management of
dysphagia in patients with acute stroke. Age and Ageing 1993 22(Suppl. 2), 1
4. Davies, S, Taylor, H., MacDonald, A., Barer, D. An interdisciplinary approach to swallowing
problems in acute stroke. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders
2001 36: (suppl 1), 357-362.
5. Hinchey, J.A.; Shephard, T.; Furie, K.; Smith, D.; Wang, D. and Tonn, S. Formal Dysphagia
Screening Protocols Prevent Pneumonia. Stroke, 2005; 36:1972-1976.
6. Perry L. Screening swallowing function of patients with acute stroke. Part two: Detailed
evaluation of the tool used by nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2001 Jul;10(4):474-81.
7. Smithard DG, O'Neill PA, England RE, Park CL, Wyatt R, Martin DF, et al. The natural
history of dysphagia following a stroke. Dysphagia. 1997 Fall;12(4):188-93.
8. National Service Framework for Older People, Department of Health publication 2001
9. RCP National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke, 3rd Edition 2008
10. Farrell Z, O'Neill D. Towards better screening and assessment of oropharyngeal swallow
disorders in the general hospital. Lancet. 1999 Jul 31;354(9176):355-6
11. Keeney A and Hibberd. Training in undertaking swallowing screening. Eating Matters. Bond
S (Ed). Centre for Health Service Research. University of Newcastle upon Tyne. 1997
12. DePippo KL, Holas MA, Reding MJ. Validation of the 3-oz water swallow test for aspiration
following stroke. Arch Neurol, 1992; 49:1259-1261.
13. Suiter DM, Leder SB. Clinical utility of the 3-ounce water swallow test. Dysphagia. 2008
Sep;23(3):244-50.
14. Boaden E, Davis S Inter Professional Dysphagia Framework. Uclan 2006
15. NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework, Department of Health 2004
95
APPENDIX 6
RATIONALE
1.
3.
4.
Wash hands.
5.
6.
7.
8.
The corflo replacement tube has a pre filled syringe within its
pack, with the appropriate volume of water.
Attach the compatible syringe to the balloon port and inflate
the balloon.
The balloon should be symmetrical. Check for any leaks.
9.
Clean around stoma site if required with normal saline and dry.
Attach the other compatible syringe to the patients balloon
valve and deflate the balloon.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Hold the tube in place, attach pre-filled syringe and inflate the
balloon.
Never use air to inflate the balloon.
14.
15.
Wipe away the excess lubricant and adjust the external fixation
device to approx. 2mm away from the skin (excludes buttons
see above)
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
97
APPENDIX 7
PROCEDURE FOR MEASURING A PRE-FORMED STOMA FOR THE INSERTION
OF A LOW PROFILE DEVICE (BUTTON)
This procedure must only be carried out by a doctor or a registered nurse, who can demonstrate
relevant theoretical knowledge and who has been assessed as competent in the procedure, in
accordance with a competency based training package.
Please refer to General Principles for All Procedures
EQUIPMENT
Stoma measuring device
Water soluble jelly
Sterile gloves
Gauze
5ml compatible syringe
Sterile water or saline 5ml (as per manufactures instructions)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ACTION
Explain the procedure to the patient.
Ask / assist the patient to lie in a supine position. Make
stoma site accessible.
Check expiry date of the stoma device.
Wash hands.
Clean dressing trolley according to procedure. Wash hands
or alcohol rub.
Empty dressing pack onto trolley, open out dressing pack
and empty all equipment onto the opened dressing pack.
Wash hands or alcohol rub and apply gloves.
RATIONALE
To alleviate any fears.
Facilitate the procedure.
To ensure that the tube is in date.
98