Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Bay Tunnel
CONTRACTOR:
MJC-JV
Bay Tunnel
Project ID Number
PROJECT RISK REGISTER
Award: $215,294,530 - NTP: 4/1/2010
PROJECT CM:
CM CONSULTANT:
Jacobs Engineering
Risk Category
001
002
Technical
Technical
Risk Description
(Hazard/Risk
Scenario)
Differing soil
condition results in
chimney to bottom
of the Bay, blow-in
to TBM, lose tunnel,
submerge shaft and
start over.
Encounter reaches
of squeezing ground
causing TBM to get
stuck.
Bob Mues
Prepared Date:
10/8/2010
N/A
Approved Date:
CURRENT ASSESSMENT
F
Location
Tunnel
Tunnel
Cause
Effect
Unplanned
hyperbaric
intervention,
and results in
loss of pressure Unrecoverable
to face of EPB
loss of tunnel
TBM, which
and shaft.
cannot be
recovered due
to nature of the
material.
Differing site
conditions
(highly plastic
TBM gets stuck
clay) of the San
in these
Antonio
reaches, and
formation in
impacts
excess to those
Contractor
or at other
production rate.
locations than
those expected
from GBR.
Risk Plan
Owner
Wong,
Johanna
Wong,
Johanna
Risk
Status
Open
Open
Trigger Date
7/12/2011
7/12/2011
Expiration
Date
9/12/2013
9/12/2013
Probability of
Occurrence
(P)
1 - Rare
2 - Unlikely
Impact to
Costs, $
(S_cost)
3 - Moderate
4 - Major
Impact to Costs, $
Impact to
Schedule,
Risk
Min. Time,
days
Calendar Days Score (R)
(S_schedule)
5 - Catastrophic 5 - Catastrophic
N/A
MITIGATION
Risk ID
Prepared By:
Approved By:
Status Update:
15
14
520
19.5
Most Likely
Time, days
520
58.5
Page 1 of 7
Max. Time,
days
520
97.5
Min. Cost, $
75,000,000
1,312,350
Most Likely
Cost, $
112,500,000
3,937,050
Max. Cost, $
150,000,000
6,561,750
Scoring Rationale
CM/SFPUC 9 FTE @
$150.00/hr =
$10,800/day and CS 8
FTE @ $100/hr =
$6,400 + office @
$100/day = $6,500/day
. Total Daily Rate =
$17,300. Add for loss
of productivity for half
of 75% of the tunnel =
9,750' - 10%, 20% &
50% reduction in
progress at average of
$1,000 per LF.
Strategy
Mitigate
Mitigate
Risk Plan
Action Items
Action Owner
Actual
Completion
Action
Status
Action Start
Action End
7/12/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
8/1/2010
9/12/2013
Proposed
8/1/2010
9/12/2013
Active
7/12/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
7/12/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
REGION/PROJECT:
Bay Tunnel
CONTRACTOR:
MJC-JV
Bay Tunnel
Project ID Number
PROJECT RISK REGISTER
Award: $215,294,530 - NTP: 4/1/2010
PROJECT CM:
CM CONSULTANT:
Jacobs Engineering
Risk Category
Risk Description
(Hazard/Risk
Scenario)
Technical
Unforeseen ground
conditions between
the Franciscan
Formation and San
Antonio Formation
interface.
003
004
Technical
005
006
Security
Regulatory
Hitting unforseen
Franciscan
Formation in
reaches not
surveyed in the
GBR
Location
Tunnel
Tunnel
Cause
Effect
Interface
Control of the
between San tunnel (vertical/
horizontal)
Antonio
Formation
alignment
(softer ground) between the San
and Franciscan
Antonio
Formation
Formation and
Differing site
conditions.
Breach in
Vandalism to site or Ravenswoo
perimeter fence
construction
d/ Newark
or bypass of
property, damage
Shafts
guard station.
Unanticipated
presence of
endangered
species.
Bob Mues
Prepared Date:
10/8/2010
N/A
Approved Date:
CURRENT ASSESSMENT
G
Additional
hyperbaric
interventions
needed to
change
cutterhead;
productivity loss;
TBM not
designed for
great lengths of
hard ground.
Risk Plan
Owner
Wong,
Johanna
Wong,
Johanna
Replacement or
repair to finished
permanent
works, safety Contractor
hazard to
"intruders" or
perpetrators.
Contractor
delayed from
starting work at
Protected
Newark and/or
species
NewarkShaf
additional
encountered
t
restrictions to
during surveys
site
or construction.
implemented
during site
activities.
Wong,
Johanna
Risk
Status
Open
Open
Trigger Date
3/1/2013
7/12/2011
Expiration
Date
7/5/2013
3/12/2013
Probability of
Occurrence
(P)
Impact to
Costs, $
(S_cost)
4 - Likely
0 - Contractor
Risk
2 - Unlikely
3 - Moderate
Impact to Costs, $
Impact to
Schedule,
Risk
Min. Time,
days
Calendar Days Score (R)
(S_schedule)
3 - Moderate
N/A
MITIGATION
Risk ID
Prepared By:
Approved By:
Status Update:
3 - Moderate
10
Most Likely
Time, days
15
Max. Time,
days
20
Min. Cost, $
673,000
Most Likely
Cost, $
1,009,500
Max. Cost, $
Scoring Rationale
Risk Plan
Action Items
1,346,000
Strategy
Open
6/1/2010
3/1/2011
5/15/2015
5/15/2015
5 - Frequent
2 - Unlikely
0 - Contractor
Risk
2 - Minor
2 - Minor
2 - Minor
20
40
Page 2 of 7
60
766,000
1,532,000
CM/SFPUC 9 FTE @
$150.00/hr =
$10,800/day and CS 8
FTE @ $100/hr =
$6,400 + office @
$100/day = $6,500/day
. Total daily cost =
$17,300. Add for loss
of productivity using
$50,000 per day X the
additional days to
accomplish the work.
2,298,000
Contractor Risk
CM/SFPUC 9 FTE @
$150.00/hr =
$10,800/day and CS 8
FTE @ $100/hr =
$6,400 + office @
$100/day = $6,500/day
+ Standby Costs @
$21,000/day =
$32,500. Total daily
rate = $38,300/day.
Standby costs include
equipment, security,
core crew costs, tunnel
lighting & ventilation,
equipment
maintenance, etc.
Mitigate
Mitigate
Actual
Completion
Action
Status
Action Owner
Action Start
Action End
Mues, Bob
1/1/2013
7/5/2013
Proposed
Mues, Bob
1/1/2013
7/5/2013
Proposed
Mues, Bob
1/1/2013
7/5/2013
Proposed
6/1/2010
3/2/2015
Active
8/1/2010
5/15/2015
Active
Contractor
11/15/2010
12/31/2014
Proposed
Contractor
8/1/2010
5/15/2015
Active
Contractor
12/1/2010
5/15/2015
Proposed
1/1/2011
4/1/2011
Proposed
2/1/2011
3/1/2011
Proposed
2/1/2011
5/1/2011
Proposed
REGION/PROJECT:
Bay Tunnel
CONTRACTOR:
MJC-JV
Bay Tunnel
Project ID Number
PROJECT RISK REGISTER
Award: $215,294,530 - NTP: 4/1/2010
PROJECT CM:
CM CONSULTANT:
Jacobs Engineering
007
008
Risk Category
Regulatory
Regulatory
009
010
Safety
Safety
Risk Description
(Hazard/Risk
Scenario)
Location
Cause
Effect
Restrictions due to
Protected birds
nesting specialnesting in
status shorebirds
Contractor
adjacent
Ravenswoo
(CA clapper rail,
delayed due
marshlands
d/ Newark
implementation
black rail, least tern,
during future
Shafts
etc.) moving into an
of buffer zones.
nesting
active construction
seasons.
area.
Union Sanitary
District prohibits
discharge of
construction water
into their system
Handling of
contaminated
groundwater/soil at
Newarks shaft site
in excess of amount
specified.
Injuries resulting
from, or while
working in,
compressed air
environment.
Bob Mues
Prepared Date:
10/8/2010
N/A
Approved Date:
CURRENT ASSESSMENT
G
Newark
Shaft
Newark
Risk Plan
Owner
Wong,
Johanna
Contamination
Additional
is too high and
permits, water
Contractor
does not comply
treatment, or offwith USD
hauling of water.
requirements
Risk
Status
Open
Open
Open
Trigger Date
2/11/2011
3/1/2011
3/1/2013
Expiration
Date
5/15/2015
8/1/2011
12/31/2013
Probability of
Occurrence
(P)
3 - Possible
3 - Possible
5 - Frequent
Impact to
Costs, $
(S_cost)
2 - Minor
0 - Contractor
Risk
0 - Contractor
Risk
3 - Moderate
3 - Moderate
Impact to Costs, $
Impact to
Schedule,
Risk
Min. Time,
days
Calendar Days Score (R)
(S_schedule)
2 - Minor
N/A
MITIGATION
Risk ID
Prepared By:
Approved By:
Status Update:
40
Most Likely
Time, days
80
Max. Time,
days
160
Min. Cost, $
1,532,000
Most Likely
Cost, $
3,064,000
7/12/2011
9/12/2013
3 - Possible
0 - Contractor
Risk
3 - Moderate
Page 3 of 7
Max. Cost, $
6,128,000
Scoring Rationale
CM/SFPUC 9 FTE @
$150.00/hr =
$10,800/day and CS 8
FTE @ $100/hr =
$6,400 + office @
$100/day = $6,500/day
+ Standby Costs @
$21,000/day =
$32,500. Total daily
rate = $38,300/day.
Standby costs include
equipment, security,
core crew costs, tunnel
lighting & ventilation,
equipment
maintenance, etc.
Contractor Risk
Contractor Risk
Strategy
1/1/2011
4/1/2011
Proposed
2/1/2011
3/1/2015
Proposed
Peterson,
Megan
2/1/2011
5/1/2015
Proposed
Contractor
2/1/2011
6/1/2011
Proposed
Contractor
12/1/2010
6/1/2011
Proposed
Contractor
12/1/2010
6/1/2010
Proposed
CM QA Inspectors to verify
that Contractor has tested
the water, and has a test
plan in place to continually Hogan, Tom
test and manage the water
throughout the Newark shaft
installation work.
3/1/2013
12/31/2013
Proposed
Verification by ECM,
QA Inspectors assure that
EIs, and QA Inspectors
the shaft is sealed to avoid
that Contractor has its
contaminated water from
plan, permits, disposal
interfering with the tunnel
site, and resources for
Mitigate
completion and installation of
this contaminated water
Hogan, Tom
the final lining pipe into the
in place prior to
tunnel and shaft, and the
commencement of the
surface pipe
Newark Shaft
installation/connection to the
installation.
existing BDPL1.
3/1/2013
12/31/2013
Proposed
Peterson,
Megan
3/1/2013
12/31/2013
Proposed
Mues, Bob
7/12/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
Mues, Bob
5/1/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
Mitigate
Contractor Risk
Action Owner
Action
Status
Action End
Continually monitor
status of birds in the
area and develop an
initial strategy for
managing this risk.
Action Items
Actual
Completion
Action Start
Mitigate
Risk Plan
Open
Ensure contractor
On-going verification that
provides the tools,
Contractor's hyperbaric work
equipment, and
facilities are operational.
Mitigate
hyperbaric work
Assure Contractor's
facilities, and follows
contingency planning is in
required contingency
place prior to the
planning for carrying out
interventions.
REGION/PROJECT:
Bay Tunnel
CONTRACTOR:
MJC-JV
Bay Tunnel
Project ID Number
PROJECT RISK REGISTER
Award: $215,294,530 - NTP: 4/1/2010
PROJECT CM:
CM CONSULTANT:
Jacobs Engineering
Risk Category
011
Safety
Technical
012
013
Community
Risk Description
(Hazard/Risk
Scenario)
Decompression
sickness
Bob Mues
Prepared Date:
10/8/2010
N/A
Approved Date:
CURRENT ASSESSMENT
F
Location
Tunnel
Cause
Effect
Risk Plan
Owner
Unintended
penetration of
the EPBM
pressure
bulkhead.
Potential loss of
EPB TBM and Contractor
tunnel.
Contractor's
Resident
failure to comply Potential work
complaints, and
with noise and stoppage until
irritation, with
Ravenswoo
vibration code complaints are
construction noise,
d
requirements, or addressed and
dust, lighting,
mitigated.
if compliant,
vibration, etc.
public irritation.
Contractor
Risk
Status
Trigger Date
Expiration
Date
Probability of
Occurrence
(P)
Impact to
Costs, $
(S_cost)
N/A
MITIGATION
Risk ID
Prepared By:
Approved By:
Status Update:
Impact to Costs, $
Impact to
Schedule,
Risk
Min. Time,
days
Calendar Days Score (R)
(S_schedule)
Most Likely
Time, days
Max. Time,
days
Min. Cost, $
Most Likely
Cost, $
014
015
Technical
Technical
Lack of sufficient
power supply.
Water leakage
around the
perimeter seal or
through the shaft
floor slab (tremie
concrete).
More abrasive
Wong,
Johanna
Contractor does
not follow
Potentially have
Ravenswoo specifications/
to replace shaft Contractor
d Shaft
Contractor
floor slab.
means &
methods faulty.
Different
subsurface
Excessive TBM
head, face
chamber, cutter,
and screw
conveyor wear
Max. Cost, $
Scoring Rationale
Strategy
Risk Plan
Action Items
Action Owner
Open
Open
7/12/2011
7/12/2011
7/1/2010
9/12/2013
9/12/2013
5/15/2015
3 - Possible
2 - Unlikely
3 - Possible
0 - Contractor
Risk
0 - Contractor
Risk
0 - Contractor
Risk
3 - Moderate
5 - Catastrophic
2 - Minor
Open
Open
3/31/2011
11/15/2010
9/12/2013
6/1/2011
2 - Unlikely
2 - Unlikely
3 - Moderate
0 - Contractor
Risk
3 - Moderate
2 - Minor
11
20
60
180
766,000
2,298,000
Contractor Risk
Contractor Risk
Contractor Risk
6,894,000
CM/SFPUC 9 FTE @
$150.00/hr =
$10,800/day and CS 8
FTE @ $100/hr =
$6,400 + office @
$100/day = $6,500/day
+ Standby Costs @
$21,000/day =
$32,500. Total daily
rate = $38,300/day.
Standby costs include
Contractor Risk
CM/SFPUC 9 FTE @
$150.00/hr =
$10,800/day and CS 8
FTE @ $100/hr =
$6,400 + office @
$100/day = $6,500/day
Wong,
Page 4 of 7
Mitigate
Require expanded
engineering controls for
sound attenuation
(mufflers/enclosures of loud
Monitor site work to
equipment).
identify problem before Require increased distance
(if possible) from sound
recognized by the
source or sound walls (if
Mitigate
public; provide
required).
proactive outreach to
Remove/change out the
community of upcoming
source or noise emitter.
activities.
4/12/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
4/12/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
4/12/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
Mues, Bob
5/1/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
Mues, Bob
5/1/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
Mues, Bob
7/1/2010
5/15/2015
Active
Mues, Bob
7/1/2010
5/15/2015
Active
Mues, Bob
7/1/2010
5/15/2015
Active
Kerby,
Christina
7/1/2010
5/15/2015
Active
4/1/2010
3/31/2011
Active
4/1/2010
3/31/2011
Active
9/15/2010
6/1/2011
Active
2/1/2011
6/1/2011
Proposed
2/1/2011
6/1/2011
Proposed
7/12/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
Action
Status
Action End
Mues, Bob
Compressed air
"hyperbaric" work
cannot commence
before all plans and Require Contractor to adhere
procedures are
to decompression
acceptable pursuant to procedures and hyperbaric Mues, Bob
California labor safety
work plans.
codes and standards,
Require
Contractor to have
including
medical resources in place
decompression
for response, transport, and
process, equipment,
Mues, Bob
care of decompression
and tables.
sickness, either on site of at
nearby hospital or other
qualified facilities.
Actual
Completion
Action Start
Open
Delay to start of
PG&E fails to
tunneling with
provide power
insufficient
Ravenswoo
service when power supply for
d
required; PG&E
TBM; loss of
power failure.
power during
tunneling.
Mues, Bob
REGION/PROJECT:
Bay Tunnel
CONTRACTOR:
MJC-JV
Bay Tunnel
Project ID Number
PROJECT RISK REGISTER
Award: $215,294,530 - NTP: 4/1/2010
PROJECT CM:
CM CONSULTANT:
Jacobs Engineering
Risk Category
016
Technical
017
018
019
020
021
022
Safety
Regulatory
Regulatory
Regulatory
Regulatory
Risk Description
(Hazard/Risk
Scenario)
ground conditions
than anticipated.
Damage to BDPLs
1& 2 or PG&E
transmission lines
due to crane tip
over.
Location
Tunnel
Shafts
Cause
Effect
Unbalanced/
excessive load
or unstable
crane platform
base during
installation of
diaphragm
slurry wall rebar
Carelessness
Inadvertantly
and/or not
injuring or killing an
following project
endangered,
Ravenswoo requirements;
threatened, or fully d/ Newark
accidental
collisions with
protected species
(SMHM, CTS, etc.)
equipment; work
in wetlands, etc.
Subsurface
Easement is not
obtained from
Management
Cargill, SamTrans,
and Mid Peninsula
Open Space District.
Tunnel
Tunnel
Terms of
Agreement not
acceptable to
parties; Board
of Supervisors
reject purchase
of subsurface
easement.
Risk
Status
Trigger Date
Expiration
Date
Probability of
Occurrence
(P)
Impact to
Costs, $
(S_cost)
Wong,
Johanna
Open
7/12/2011
9/12/2013
3 - Possible
3 - Moderate
Wong,
Johanna
Work stoppage
by USFWS
and/or CDFG
until additional
Contractor
mitigation
measures can
be developed/
approved.
Additional time
Additional
and costs
requirements
incurred by
imposed by
Contractor and
higher risk level
Additional RWQCB
CM team
requirements as a
under NPDES
Ravenswoo
associated with
General
result of risk
d/Newark
sampling,
assessment prior to
Construction
monitoring and
Stormwater
Sept 2, 2011.
reporting;
Permit due to
additional
duration of
RWQCB
project.
coordination.
Various: BCDC
want removal of
BDPLs 1&2;
BCDC may
claim jurisdiction
below the Bay;
subsurface
easements are
Risk Plan
Owner
Electrocution, if
PG&E
transmission
lines hit; power Contractor
outage. Service
outage, if BDPLs
hit; damage
requiring
Bay Margin is
known to
Unanticipated
contain
Work stoppage
cultural or
prehistoric and
until the
paleontological
Ravenswoo paleontological resource can be
properly
discoveries during
d/ Newark resources, but
evaluated/
shaft excavation,
construction
tunneling, or tie-ins
methods
recovered.
prevent surveys
and monitoring
10/8/2010
N/A
Cannot start
tunnel
excavation.
Cannot start
tunnel
excavation.
Wong,
Johanna
Wong,
Johanna
Wong,
Johanna
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
8/1/2010
8/1/2010
5/20/2010
5/20/2010
9/20/2010
9/20/2010
11/15/2010
5/15/2015
5/15/2015
5/15/2015
6/30/2011
6/30/2011
3 - Possible
2 - Unlikely
1 - Rare
4 - Likely
2 - Unlikely
2 - Unlikely
0 - Contractor
Risk
2 - Minor
0 - Contractor
Risk
1 - Insignificant
3 - Moderate
2 - Minor
4 - Major
1 - Insignificant
5 - Catastrophic 5 - Catastrophic
5 - Catastrophic 5 - Catastrophic
Impact to Costs, $
Impact to
Schedule,
Risk
Min. Time,
days
Calendar Days Score (R)
(S_schedule)
2 - Minor
N/A
MITIGATION
12
21
21
20
20
60
60
Max. Time,
days
Min. Cost, $
Most Likely
Cost, $
Max. Cost, $
30
40
1,346,000
2,019,000
2,692,000
40
120
120
60
240
240
766,000
50,000
1,488,000
1,488,000
1,532,000
100,000
2,976,000
2,976,000
2,298,000
250,000
Scoring Rationale
$100/day = $6,500/day
. Total daily cost =
$17,300. Add $1M,
$1.5M & $2M for
replacement parts, lost
time for replacement
and lost productivity.
Contractor Risk
CM/SFPUC 9 FTE @
$150.00/hr =
$10,800/day and CS 8
FTE @ $100/hr =
$6,400 + office @
$100/day = $6,500/day
+ Standby Costs @
$21,000/day =
$32,500. Total Daily
Rate = $38,300/day.
Standby costs include
equipment, security,
core crew costs, tunnel
lighting & ventilation,
equipment
Contractor Risk
Additional SWPP
requirements and
monitoring. Estimated
costs by PUC/CM
Team.
Strategy
Mitigate
Mitigate
Mitigate
Risk Plan
Assure Contractor is
well prepared with
acceptable JHAs for
each portion of slurry
wall construction.
Action
Status
Action Owner
Action Start
Action End
Mues, Bob
7/12/2011
9/12/2013
Proposed
Hogan, Tom
8/1/2010
12/1/2010
Active
8/1/2010
12/1/2010
Active
Peterson,
Megan
12/1/2010
2/1/2010
Completed
Peterson,
Eric
4/1/2010
12/31/2014
Active
Peterson,
Megan
4/1/2010
12/31/2014
Active
Peterson,
Eric
4/1/2010
12/31/2014
Active
Peterson,
Eric
4/1/2010
12/31/2014
Active
Peterson,
Megan
12/1/2010
3/1/2011
Active
4/1/2010
5/31/2010
Completed
4/1/2011
10/30/2010
Active
5/20/2010
3/1/2015
Active
5/20/2010
5/1/2015
Active
Implement existing
Ensure that worker training is
procedures for
conducted according to the
unanticipated
MMRP and specifications.
discoveries and work
quickly to mobilize
Coordinate with the
specialists to the field. Contractor in the event of a
find to quickly assess the
significance and possible
need for work stoppage.
Implement requirements
as specified in project
Mitigate documents and develop
comprehensive training
program
Actual
Completion
Action Items
5,952,000
CM/SFPUC 9 FTE @
$150.00/hr =
$10,800/day and CS 8
FTE @ $100/hr =
$6,400 + office @
$100/day = $6,500/day
+ Standby Costs @
$7,500/day =
$14,000/day. Total
Daily Rate =
Avoid
Zhang, Yin
Lan
9/20/2010
6/30/2011
Active
5,952,000
CM/SFPUC 9 FTE @
$150.00/hr =
$10,800/day and CS 8
FTE @ $100/hr =
$6,400 + office @
$100/day = $6,500/day
+ Standby Costs @
$7,500/day =
$14,000/day. Total
Daily Rate =
$24,800/day. Standby
costs include
equipment, security,
Avoid
Morelli, Brian
9/20/2010
30-Jun-11
Active
Hnat, Steve
8/1/2010
5/15/2015
Active
CM/SFPUC 9 FTE @
$150.00/hr =
$10,800/day and CS 8
FTE @ $100/hr =
$6,400 + office @
Page 5 of 7
Most Likely
Time, days
Bob Mues
Prepared Date:
Approved Date:
CURRENT ASSESSMENT
Severity of Impact (S)
Risk ID
Prepared By:
Approved By:
Status Update:
REGION/PROJECT:
Bay Tunnel
CONTRACTOR:
MJC-JV
Bay Tunnel
Project ID Number
PROJECT RISK REGISTER
Award: $215,294,530 - NTP: 4/1/2010
PROJECT CM:
CM CONSULTANT:
Jacobs Engineering
Risk Category
Risk Description
(Hazard/Risk
Scenario)
Operations
Failure of BDPL1 or 2 in
vicinity of Ravenswood
or Newark shafts.
023
024
Operations
Delay in shut-down
schedule.
Bob Mues
Prepared Date:
10/8/2010
N/A
Approved Date:
CURRENT ASSESSMENT
F
Location
Cause
Effect
Risk Plan
Owner
Ravenswood
Potentially weeks of
Failure of the
delay while the
contractor supplied
submersible pumps pumps are either
repaired or rental
during disinfection
units are located; it
of the pipe within
might also result in
the tunnel.
re-disinfecting, etc.
Contractor
Risk
Status
Open
Open
Trigger Date
8/1/2010
9/1/2014
Expiration
Date
5/15/2015
2/10/2015
Probability of
Occurrence
(P)
2 - Unlikely
2 - Unlikely
Impact to
Costs, $
(S_cost)
3 - Moderate
0 - Contractor
Risk
3 - Moderate
Impact to Costs, $
Impact to
Schedule,
Risk
Min. Time,
days
Calendar Days Score (R)
(S_schedule)
2 - Minor
N/A
MITIGATION
Risk ID
Prepared By:
Approved By:
Status Update:
11
10
Most Likely
Time, days
20
Page 6 of 7
Max. Time,
days
30
Min. Cost, $
483,000
Most Likely
Cost, $
866,000
Max. Cost, $
1,249,000
Scoring Rationale
$6,400 + office @
$100/day = $6,500/day
+ Standby Costs @
$21,000/day =
$32,500. Total Daily
Rate = $38,300/day.
Standby costs include
equipment, security,
core crew costs, tunnel
lighting & ventilation,
Contractor Risk
Strategy
Mitigate
Mitigate
Risk Plan
Actual
Completion
Action
Status
Action Items
Action Owner
Action Start
Action End
Mues, Bob
8/1/2010
5/15/2015
Active
Mues, Bob
12/1/2010
5/15/2015
Proposed
Contractor
9/1/2014
2/10/2015
Proposed
Mues, Bob
9/1/2014
2/10/2015
Proposed
Assure Contractor's
Check functioning of submersible
submersible pumps are
pumps before planned shut-down.
functioning well before the
start of shut-down; check that
Check suppliers through Contractor
supplies of back-up pumps
to verify supply of available back-up
are readily available (if
pumps.
needed).
REGION/PROJECT:
Bay Tunnel
CONTRACTOR:
MJC-JV
Bay Tunnel
Project ID Number
PROJECT RISK REGISTER
Award: $215,294,530 - NTP: 4/1/2010
PROJECT CM:
CM CONSULTANT:
Jacobs Engineering
Risk Category
025
Safety
026
027
Security
Operations
Risk Description
(Hazard/Risk
Scenario)
Location
Terrorism - Direct
Impact
Bob Mues
Prepared Date:
10/8/2010
N/A
Approved Date:
CURRENT ASSESSMENT
F
Cause
Effect
Risk Plan
Owner
Risk
Status
Trigger Date
Expiration
Date
Probability of
Occurrence
(P)
Act of God
Temporary site
facilities may be
damaged. May
have to reexcavate shaft
and portions of
the tunnel to reaccess. Integrity
of shaft and
tunnel possisbly
compromised.
Wong,
Johanna
Open
8/5/2010
3/2/2015
1 - Rare
Physical
Bomb, projectile
damage or
of any kind,
biological
Bay Tunnel
biological
contamination to
contamination
SFPUC Water
etc.
System.
Failure to meet
contractual shutBay Tunnel
down schedule for
BDPL1 and BDPL2
Operations or
other projects
don't allow
shutdown to
make tie in at
appropriate
time.
Unable to
complete tie in
of Bay Tunnel
(BDPL5) to
BDPLs 1 and 2.
Wong,
Johanna
Wong,
Johanna
Open
Open
8/5/2010
9/14/2014
3/2/2015
2/10/2015
1 - Rare
1 - Rare
Impact to
Costs, $
(S_cost)
5 - Catastrophic 5 - Catastrophic
2 - Minor
2 - Minor
Impact to Costs, $
Impact to
Schedule,
Risk
Min. Time,
days
Calendar Days Score (R)
(S_schedule)
5 - Catastrophic 5 - Catastrophic
N/A
MITIGATION
Risk ID
Prepared By:
Approved By:
Status Update:
15
15
30
Max. Time,
days
Min. Cost, $
Most Likely
Cost, $
Max. Cost, $
Scoring Rationale
Strategy
Risk Plan
Contractor Risk
Accept
Implementation of
Safety Plan.
60
Page 7 of 7
365
100,000
200,000
Most Likely
Time, days
Contractor Risk
300,000
Action Items
Action Owner
Actual
Completion
Action
Status
Action Start
Action End
9/1/2013
2/10/2015
Proposed
9/1/2014
2/10/2015
Proposed
Mues, Bob