Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
This action arises under the Copyright Act of 1976, Title 17 U.S.C.
27 101 et seq.
28
2.
This Court has federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
3.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over all the Defendants by virtue of
3 their transacting, doing, and soliciting business in this District, and because a
4 substantial part of the relevant events occurred in this District.
5
4.
PARTIES
5.
9 corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, with its
10 principal place of business at 9838 Research Dr., Irvine, CA 92618.
11
6.
12 R&Y GROUP, LLC (R&Y) is a limited liability company organized and existing
13 under the laws of the State of Florida, with its principal place of business at 19555
14 NE 10th Ave., Miami, FL 33179.
15
7.
8.
10.
2 cell phone case design entitled Spigen Case Inner Pattern Design (Subject
3 Design). Plaintiff has applied for copyright registration for the Subject Design,
4 Application No. 1-1892300921.
5
11.
Plaintiff has applied for design patent applications with the United
6 States Patent and Trademark Office for its cell phone case (Spigen Cases).
7
12.
Prior to the acts complained of herein, Plaintiff has sold cell phone cases
8 bearing the Subject Design and the Spigen Cases to numerous parties in the industry.
9
13.
10 this distribution of the Spigen Cases and products bearing the Subject Design, R&Y,
11 Groupon, and DOE Defendants created, manufactured, caused to be manufactured,
12 imported, distributed, and/or sold cell phone cases bearing a design which is
13 identical, or substantially similar, to the Subject Design without Plaintiffs
14 authorization (hereinafter "Subject Product").
15
14.
Subject Product includes but is not limited to cell phone cases sold by
15.
16.
20 the Spigen Case bearing the Subject Design that the Subject Product is the result of
21 unlawful copying. An image of the Spigen Case and an exemplar of the Subject
22 Product are set forth in Exhibit B.
23
17.
24 and each of them, had access to Plaintiffs cell phone cases and the Spigen Cases
25 distributed on the market.
26
18.
1 by producing, distributing and/or selling cell phone cases which infringe the Subject
2 Design.
3
19.
20.
6 Defendants, and each of them, have obtained profits they would not otherwise have
7 realized but for their infringement of the Subject Design.
8
21.
14 follows:
15
1.
2.
16 trial;
17
3.
4.
5.
That Defendants, and each of them, account to Plaintiff for their profits
24 and any damages sustained by Plaintiff as a result of the conduct alleged herein;
25
6.
26 Copyright law;
27
7.
28
8.
For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
4
1
2 Dated: November 12, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
JURY DEMAND
1
2
3
4
5 Dated: November 12, 2014
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
EXHIBIT A
Subject Design
Subject Product
EXHIBIT B
Spigen Case
Subject Product