Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Leino Timo: Work and health country profiles of twenty-two European Countries. People and Work Research Reports 52. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki 2002, pp. 121-138.
Jorma Rantanen, Timo Kauppinen, Suvi Lehtinen, Jouni Toikkanen, Kari Kurppa, Timo
Leino
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Finland has been an independent republic since 6 December 1917. The population of
Finland is 5.1 million and the area 338,000 km2 (population density 15 per km2). 63%
of the population live in urban areas. The capital city is Helsinki (540,000 habitants),
and the official languages are Finnish (spoken by 93% of the population) and Swedish
(6%). The country is divided into five provinces and 455 municipalities.
Table 1. Population statistics of Finland in 1998
Population (million)
Men (%)
Women (%)
5.160
48.8
51.2
2.507
2.222
52.8
47.2
0.285
11.4
11.1
9.6
SOURCES: Labour force survey 1998. Population statistics. Statistics Finland, Helsinki, 1999.
Economy
Table 2. Selected economic indicators of Finland
Gross national product (GNP) per capita (in USD) in 1996
Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (purchasing power parity
in USD) in 1994
GDP produced by agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing (%)
GDP produced by industry and construction (%)
GDP produced by services (%)
Export as % of GDP
Import as % of GDP
Inflation rate (%)
Finland
23,240
17,417
4.4
35.4
60.2
37.7
29.7
1.2
SOURCES: Health in Europe 1997, WHO Regional Publications, European Series, No 83, annex 1.
FINLAND: GDP (%) figures from Statistical Yearbook Finland, Helsinki 1998.
The Finnish economy has improved continuously after an economic recession in the early
1990s. In 1997, Finland imported mainly mechanical appliances (15%), electrical machinery
and equipment (14%), mineral fuels and oils (10%) and automobiles and bicycles (8%). The
major export commodities were paper and paperboard (21%), electrical machinery and equipment (18%), mechanical appliances (14%) and wood and wood articles (6%).
Labour force
Table 3. The employed by industry in Finland in 1997
Industry
N
(1, 000)
150
2
6
436
%
7
0.1
0.3
20
22
130
263
1
6
12
66
164
48
192
133
146
310
116
4
7
0
2,195
3
7
2
9
6
7
14
5
0.2
0.3
0
99.9
73.4
80.5
4.0
4.1
81.7
66.8
79.3
26.5
0.94
7.5
3.0
1.0
10.6
SOURCES: Health in Europe 1997, WHO Regional Publication, European Series, No 83, annex
1. Eurostat.
Life expectancy (1997) and numbers of registered physicians, dentists and nurses (1997) from
Statistical Yearbook of Finland 1998, Helsinki 1998.
REMARKS: The human development index measures the average achievements in a country in three
basic dimensions of human development: longevity, knowledge and, a decent standard of living.
Indicator
Health level
(DALE)
Health distribution
Level of responsiveness
Distribution of
responsiveness
Fairness in financial contribution
Overall goal
attainment
Health expenditure
Health system
performance
on level of
health
Overall health
system performance
Definition
Unit
of indicator
see source
see source
see source
see source
see source
see source
see source
see source
see source
Table 6. Data for health system attainment and performance in WHO Member States in
1997
Measure
Health level (DALE)
Health distribution
0
Level of responsiveness
Country
Index country: Finland
Best WHO country: Japan
Worst WHO country: Sierra Leone
Index country: Finland
Best WHO country: Chile
Worst WHO country: Liberia
Index country: Finland
Best WHO country: United States of
America
Worst WHO country: Somalia
Rank
20
1
191
27
1
191
19
1
191
Distribution of responsiveness
Fairness in financial
contribution
Overall goal attainment
Health expenditure
20.5
1
191
1
191
22
1
191
18
1
1
191
31
1
191
9.5
191
44
*
*
*
*
Regulations
Enforcement
Inspection
Directions
Advisory committee
on occupational health
services
*
*
*
*
Training
Information
Registers
Funding
OTHER AUTHORITIES
Safety Technology Authority
Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety
National Public Health Institute
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health
National Product Control Agency for Welfare
Safety delegates
WORKPLACE
Safety representatives
Occupational safety committee
Employer
Employee
State advisory
committee
on occupational health
and safety matters
Finnish Institute of
Occupational Health
- 6 regional institutes
Technical Research
Centre of Finland
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Consultations
Training
Information
Register of occupational
safety personnel
Research grants
Grant for applied research
Scholarships
State grant for occupational
safety (State administration)
* Agreements (State administration)
*
*
*
*
Research
Expert services
Measurements
Statements
Universities
Private research
institutes
Federation of
Accident Insurance
Institutions
* Education
* Information
* Statistics
OH service models
The following five models were used for occupational health (OH) services until January 1996: (1) the municipal health care center model, (2) companies in-plant services
(integrated model), (3) group services for several small or medium-sized enterprises
(joint model), (4) regional service units of the state (structure similar to that of group
services), and (5) private medical center model.
Enterprise
Enterprise
Self-employed
Municipal health
care centre
Enterprises 65%
Employees 40%
OHS units 29%
Farmers
Enterprise
Enterprise
Enterprises 2%
Employees 28%
OHS units 43%
OHS
unit
Enterprise
Enterprise
Enterprises
Employees
OHS units
4%
6%
6%
Enterprise
Joint model OHS unit
Enterprise
Enterprise
Enterprises
Employees
OHS units
29%
26%
22%
Private medical
centre
Enterprise
Enterprise
Indicator
Proportion of ILO
conventions on
OH&S ratified
Coverage
of accident
insurance
Proportion of the
employed covered
by accident insurance
Proportion of the
employed covered
by occupational
health services
Coverage
of occupational
health care
Definition of indicator
Proportion of ILO conventions relevant to OH&S (N = 22) which a
country has ratified until present (0
100%)
Proportion of the employed covered
by compulsory or voluntary accident
insurance including insurance against
occupational diseases (0100%)
Proportion of the employed covered
by compulsory or voluntary occupational health services (0100%)
Unit
%
ILO ratification
Country
Year
2002
2002
2002
1998
1997
N Value of
indicator
18
82
18
82
0
0
91
Unit
%
%
%
%
87 %
SOURCES: http://ilolex.ilo.ch:1567/english/.
REMARKS: The 22 ILO Conventions relevant to OH&S are Conventions No. 13, 81, 115, 119, 121, 127,
129, 133, 134, 136, 139, 148, 152, 155, 161, 162, 164, 167, 170, 174, 176, and 184. From these, Finland
has ratified Conventions No. 13, 81, 115, 119, 121, 129, 133, 134, 136, 139, 148, 152, 155, 161, 162, 164,
167 and 176.
Definition of indicator
Number of all types of labour safety inspectors (full-time equivalents) per 1,000
employed workers
Number of safety representatives of
workers and safety managers (full-time
equivalents) at workplaces per 1,000 employed workers
Number of physicians and nurses (fulltime equivalents) in occupational health
services per 1,000 employed workers
Unit
/1,000
employed
/1,000
employed
/1,000
employed
Year
N involved
including
part-time
workers
N as fulltime
equivalents
Value of
indicator
Unit
Occupational health
physicians
1998
8851
Occupational health
nurses
1998
1,6921
Occupational physiotherapists
1998
2991
Occupational hygienists
1998
1502
1998
3603
1998
10,2084
Safety representatives of
employees
1998
13,5694
/1,000 employed
/1,000 em-
which:
Other professional group,
which:
employed
/1,000 employed
/1,000 employed
Table 10B. Key activities (functions) in O&H system. Alternative terms are presented
(the most commonly used in bold).
Process
Workplace surveys, workplace visits, exposure
assessment, risk assessment and management
Health examinations, health surveillance (general
& risk-based)
Workplace health promotion, health education,
counselling
Assessment of work ability, rehabilitation
YES, on
YES, on
compulsory voluntary
basis
basis
X
X
X
X
X
Curative services
First aid, accident management
Safety inspections
Initiatives and advice for management of workplace safety and health; safe workplace design
10
NO
11
Vibration
Radiation
High temperatures
Indicator
Prevalence of exposure to high
level noise among
the employed
Definition of indicator
Question in survey:
How often are you exposed at work to
each of the following? Noise so loud that
you would have to raise your voice to talk
to people (all of the time, almost all of the
time, around 3/4 of the time, around half of
the time, around 1/4 of the time, almost
never, never, don't know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
Prevalence of exQuestion in survey:
posure to vibration How often are you exposed at work to
among the emeach of the following? Vibration from
ployed
hand tools, machinery, etc. (all of the time,
almost all of the time, around 3/4 of the
time, around half of the time, around 1/4 of
the time, almost never, never, don't know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
Prevalence of exQuestion in survey:
posure to radiation How often are you exposed at work to
among the emeach of the following? Radiation such as
ployed
X-rays, radioactive radiation, welding
light, laser beams (all of the time, almost
all of the time, around 3/4 of the time,
around half of the time, around 1/4 of the
time, almost never, never, don't know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
Prevalence of exQuestion in survey:
posure to high
How often are you exposed at work to
temperatures
each of the following? High temperature
among the emwhich makes you perspire even when not
ployed
working (all of the time, almost all of the
time, around 3/4 of the time, around half of
the time, around 1/4 of the time, almost
never, never, don't know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
12
Unit
%
Low temperatures
Breathing in
vapours
Prevalence of
breathing in vapours among the
employed
Handling
dangerous
substances
Prevalence of
handling dangerous goods among
the employed
Question in survey:
%
How often are you exposed at work to
each of the following? Low temperatures
whether indoors or outdoors (all of the
time, almost all of the time, around 3/4 of
the time, around half of the time, around
1/4 of the time, almost never, never, don't
know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
Question in survey:
%
How often are you exposed at work to
each of the following? Breathing in vapours, fumes, dust, or dangerous substances such as chemicals, infectious materials, etc. (all of the time, almost all of the
time, around 3/4 of the time, around half of
the time, around 1/4 of the time, almost
never, never, don't know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
Question in survey:
%
How often are you exposed at work to
each of the following? Handling or touching dangerous products or substances (all
of the time, almost all of the time, around
3/4 of the time, around half of the time,
around 1/4 of the time, almost never,
never, don't know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
Table 12. Data for indicators of physicochemical exposures (Second European Working
Conditions Survey 1997)
Agent
Country
High-level noise
Vibration
Radiation
High temperatures
13
Value of
indicator
39
21
39
26
13
Unit
37
8
3
9
20
14
40
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Low temperatures
Breathing in vapours
Handling dangerous
substances
19
17
%
%
44
34
15
47
18
%
%
%
%
%
10
32
Table 13. Indicators of use of asbestos (Tossavainen and Takahashi 2000) and pesticides at work (FAO database on pesticide consumption)
Agent
Asbestos
Pesticides
Indicator
Consumption of asbestos per capita per
year
Consumption of pesticides per agricultural worker per year
Definition of indicator
Reported consumption of
asbestos per capita
Unit
kg/capita/y
Consumption of pesticides
per agricultural worker as
reported to FAO
kg/agricultural
worker/y
Table 14. Data for indicators of use of asbestos (Tossavainen and Takahashi 2000) and
of pesticides at work (FAO database on pesticide consumption)
Agent
Country
Asbestos
Pesticides
Value of
indicator
0
0
3.4
12
0
181
Unit
kg/capita/y
kg/capita/y
kg/capita/y
kg/agr worker/y
kg/agr worker/y
kg/agr worker/y
14
Table 15. Indicators of harm due to physicochemical exposures (Finnish Work and
Health Surveys 1997 and 2000, Piirainen et al. 1997 and 2000)
Agent
Noise
Vibration
Dust
Solvents
Detergents
etc.
Gases, exhausts
Environmental tobacco
smoke
Indicator
Prevalence of
harm due to
exposure to
noise among
the employed
Prevalence of
harm due to
exposure to
vibration
among the
employed
Prevalence of
harm due to
exposure to
dust among
the employed
Prevalence of
harm due to
exposure to
solvents
among the
employed
Prevalence of
harm due to
exposure to
detergents etc.
among the employed
Prevalence of
harm due to
exposure to
gases, exhausts
among the employed
Prevalence of
harm due to
exposure to
environmental
tobacco smoke
among the employed
Definition of indicator
Question in survey:
Does noise occur in your work? (yes, no) Is noise
harmful in your work (no, to some extent, rather
harmful, very harmful)
Included if rather or very harmful
Question in survey:
Does vibration occur in your work? (yes, no) Is
vibration harmful in your work (no, to some extent, rather harmful, very harmful)
Included if rather or very harmful
Unit
%
Question in survey:
Does dust occur in your work? (yes, no) Is dust
harmful in your work (no, to some extent, rather
harmful, very harmful)
Included if rather or very harmful
Question in survey:
Do solvents occur in your work? (yes, no) Are
solvents harmful in your work (no, to some extent,
rather harmful, very harmful)
Included if rather or very harmful
Question in survey:
Do detergents etc. occur in your work? (yes, no)
Are detergents etc. harmful in your work (no, to
some extent, rather harmful, very harmful)
Included if rather or very harmful
Question in survey:
Do gases, exhausts occur in your work? (yes, no)
Are gases, exhausts harmful in your work (no, to
some extent, rather harmful, very harmful)
Included if rather or very harmful
Question in survey:
Does environmental tobacco smoke occur in
your work? (yes, no) Is environmental tobacco
smoke harmful in your work (no, to some extent,
rather harmful, very harmful)
Included if rather or very harmful
15
Cold, heat
or draught
Inadequate
lighting
Mouldy
smell
Prevalence of
harm due to
exposure to
cold, heat or
draught among
the employed
Prevalence of
harm due to
inadequate
lighting among
the employed
Prevalence of
harm due to
exposure to
mouldy smell
among the employed
Question in survey:
%
Does cold, heat or draught occur in your work?
(yes, no) Is cold, heat or draught harmful in your
work (no, to some extent, rather harmful, very
harmful)
Included if rather or very harmful
Question in survey:
%
Does inadequate lighting occur in your work?
(yes, no) Is inadequate lighting harmful in your
work (no, to some extent, rather harmful, very
harmful)
Included if rather or very harmful
Question in survey:
%
Does mouldy smell occur in your work? (yes,
no) Is mouldy smell harmful in your work (no, to
some extent, rather harmful, very harmful)
Included if rather or very harmful
Table 16. Data for indicators of harm due to physicochemical exposures in Finland
Agent
Noise
Vibration
Dust
Solvents
Detergents, etc.
Gases, exhausts
Environmental tobacco
smoke
Cold, heat or draught
Inadequate lighting
Mouldy smell
Year
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Value
10.4
2.1
10.4
2.3
2.6
2.2
2
2000
2000
2000
Unit
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
16 %
4.5 %
10.8 %
16
Indicator
Estimated prevalence of regular exposure to solar radiation among the
employed
Tobacco
smoke (environmental)
Silica, crystalline
Diesel engine
exhaust
Wood dust
Definition
Regular outdoor work (>75% of annual working time) is considered to
entail exposure. The figures are not
comparable from the point of view of
UV radiation dose, because the intensity of radiation varies by country.
Inhalatory exposure at work to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) due
to smoking of customers or coworkers.
Inhaling ETS (as smoke or 'smell') at
least 75% of working time is considered to entail exposure.
Inhalatory exposure at work to crystalline silica (mainly as quartz, cristobalite, tridymite or tripoli) or minerals containing crystalline silica probably exceeding nonoccupational exposure originating from road dust, beach
sand, etc. (long-term exposure level to
respirable dust usually <0.01 mg/m3).
Excludes amorphous silica and clay.
Inhalatory exposure at work to diesel
engine exhaust likely to exceed significantly the nonoccupational background level in urban air (usually <0.6
mg/m3, often <0.1 mg/m3, measured as
nitrogen dioxide).
Inhalatory exposure at work to radon222 and its decay products (e.g., radioactive polonium, lead and bismuth)
resulting in doubling of nonoccupational dose which varies by country.
Also office work indoors where radon
level is high is considered to entail exposure.
Inhalatory exposure at work to hardwood dust (e.g., oak, beech, elm, ash,
birch, most tropical woods), softwood
dust (e.g., pine, spruce, larch), woodbark dust and dusts containing wood
(e.g., plywood or particleboard dust)
probably exceeding nonoccupational
exposure from leisure-time woodworking (long-term exposure level
usually <0.1 mg/m3). Excludes exposure to pulp and paper dust.
17
Unit
%
Benzene
Asbestos
Table 18. Data for indicators of occupational exposure to carcinogens (CAREX database of FIOH)
Agent
Country
Year
Solar radiation
19903
19903
19903
Tobacco
smoke (environmental)
Silica, crystalline
Diesel engine
exhaust
N exposed
180,000
560,000
460,000
Value of
indicator
8.6
3.3
13.7
Unit
%
%
%
2000
30,000
1.3 %
2000
30,000
1.3 %
19903
11,000
6 %
1998
2000
Best EU country: France 19903
Worst EU country: Lux- 19903
embourg
Index country: Finlanda 1998
2000
Best EU country: Fin1998
land
Worst EU country: Italy 19903
60,000
2.6 %
110,000
7,400
0.5 %
4 %
36,000
1.6 %
36,000
1.6 %
550,000
3.2 %
18
Wood dust
Benzene
Asbestos
19903
49,000
2.3 %
19903
0 %
19903
99,000
2.5 %
1998
2000
Best EU country: France 19903
Worst EU country:
19903
Spain
Index country: Finland
19903
52,000
2.3 %
180,000
400,000
0.8 %
3.3 %
13,000
0.6 %
19903
13,000
0.6 %
19903
1998
1998
290,000
1,600
1,600
1.7 %
0.1 %
0.1 %
19903
49,000
1.8 %
2,000
2,000
0.3 %
0.1 %
680,000
4 %
1998
1998
19903
Indicator
Prevalence of painful or tiring positions among the
employed
Definition of indicator
Question in survey:
How often does your main paid job involve
each of the following? Painful or tiring positions (all of the time, almost all of the
time, around 3/4 of the time, around half of
the time, around 1/4 of the time, almost
never, never, don't know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
19
Unit
%
Heavy
loads
Repetitive
hand/arm
movements
Temperature not
adjustable
Lighting
not adjustable
Ventilation
not adjustable
Seat not
adjustable
Question in survey:
How often does your main paid job involve
each of the following? Carrying or moving
heavy loads (all of the time, almost all of
the time, around 3/4 of the time, around
half of the time, around 1/4 of the time, almost never, never, don't know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
Question in survey:
How often does your main paid job involve
each of the following? Repetitive hand or
arm movements (all of the time, almost all
of the time, around 3/4 of the time, around
half of the time, around 1/4 of the time, almost never, never, don't know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
Question in survey:
Which, if any, of the following working
conditions can you adjust personally to
your own comfort?
The temperature
Included if not adjustable
Question in survey:
Which, if any, of the following working
conditions can you adjust personally to
your own comfort?
The lighting
Included if not adjustable
Question in survey:
Which, if any, of the following working
conditions can you adjust personally to
your own comfort?
The ventilation
Included if not adjustable
Question in survey:
Which, if any, of the following working
conditions can you adjust personally to
your own comfort?
The position of your desk, bench or work
station
Included if not adjustable
Question in survey:
Which, if any, of the following working
conditions can you adjust personally to
your own comfort?
The position of your seat
Included if not adjustable
20
Equipment
not adjustable
Question in survey:
Which, if any, of the following working
conditions can you adjust personally to
your own comfort?
The instrument(s) or equipment you use
Included if not adjustable
Table 20. Data for indicators of physical and ergonomic factors (Second European
Working Conditions Survey 1997)
Agent
Country
Painful positions
Heavy loads
Repetitive hand/arm
movements
Temperature not adjustable
Value of Unit
indicator
45 %
28 %
68
38
24
40
79
%
%
%
%
%
43 %
79 %
61 %
49 %
43 %
78 %
53 %
45
79
39
31
78
43
38
75
21
70
40
27
69
62
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Table 21. Indicators of harm due to physical and ergonomic factors (Finnish Work and
Health Surveys 1997 and 2000, Piirainen et al. 1997 and 2000)
Agent
Heavy
work
Lifting
Indicator
Prevalence of
physically
heavy work
among the
employed
Prevalence of
lifting among
the employed
Difficult
positions
of back
Prevalence of
difficult positions of
back among
the employed
Difficult
positions
of hands
Prevalence of
difficult positions of
hands among
the employed
Kneeling
positions
Prevalence of
kneeling positions
among the
employed
Prevalence of
hand movements requiring
power among
the employed
Hand
movement
requiring
power
Repetitive Prevalence of
hand move- repetitive
ments
hand movements except
typing
among the
employed
Definition of indicator
Question in survey:
Is your work physically light, rather light, to some
extent heavy, rather heavy, heavy?
Included if rather or very heavy
Unit
%
Question in survey:
Does your work contain lifting, carrying, manual
holding up? (not at all, occasionally, every day or
almost everyday, many times daily, many times in
an hour)
Included if many times in an hour
Question in survey:
Do you work in a slouched position or otherwise
with back in a difficult position? (not at all, over 4
h daily, 14 h daily, less than 1 h daily, almost
every day, occasionally)
Included if at least 1 h daily
Question in survey:
Do you work one or both hands above shoulder
level or otherwise in a position where you have to
hold up your hands? (not at all, over 4 h daily, 14
h daily, less than 1 h daily, almost every day, occasionally)
Included if at least 1 h daily
Question in survey:
Do you work in kneeling positions? (not at all, over
4 h daily, 14 h daily, less than 1 h daily, almost
every day, occasionally)
Included if at least 1 h daily
Question in survey:
Does your work contain hand movements requiring
power, like screwing, carving, cutting, twisting of
cleaning cloth or milking? (not at all, over 4 h
daily, 14 h daily, less than 1 h daily, almost every
day, occasionally)
Included if at least 1 h daily
Question in survey:
Does your work contain repeating similar movements of hands many times per minute? These occur in e.g. production line and assembly work,
pricing or when moving things from an assembly
line. Typing with typewriter or computer is not
meant in this question. (not at all, over 4 h daily, 1
4 h daily, less than 1 h daily, almost every day, occasionally)
Included if at least 1 h daily
22
Regular
standing
work
Regular
sitting
work
Prevalence of
regular
standing
work among
the employed
Question in survey:
Is your work mainly walking, standing, sitting or
some of these? (sitting / walking, sitting / walking,
standing, sitting / standing / walking / standing, sitting / other)
Included if standing
Prevalence of Question in survey:
regular sitIs your work mainly walking, standing, sitting or
ting work
some of these? (sitting / walking, sitting / walking,
among the
standing, sitting / standing / walking / standing, sitemployed
ting / other)
Included if sitting
Table 22. Data for indicators of harm due to physical and ergonomic factors in Finland
Agent
Heavy work
Lifting
Difficult positions of back
Difficult positions of hands
Kneeling positions
Hand movements requiring power
Repetitive hand movements
Regular standing work
Regular sitting work
Year
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Value
24.6
13.4
23.1
11.7
13.4
17.2
23
5.9
30.4
Unit
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Psychosocial factors
Table 23. Indicators of psychosocial factors (Second European Working Conditions
Survey 1997)
Agent
Working
at very
high speed
Working
to tight
deadlines
Indicator
Prevalence of
working at very
high speed
among the employed
Definition of indicator
Unit
Question in survey:
%
How often does your main paid job involve each
of the following? Working at very high speed
(all of the time, almost all of the time, around 3/4
of the time, around half of the time, around 1/4
of the time, almost never, never, don't know).
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
Prevalence of
Question in survey:
%
working to tight How often does your main paid job involve each
deadlines among of the following? Working to tight deadlines (all
the employed
of the time, almost all of the time, around 3/4 of
the time, around half of the time, around 1/4 of
the time, almost never, never, don't know)
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
23
Not
enough
time to do
the job
Prevalence of
lack of time to
do the job
among the employed
Rate of
Prevalence of
work not
nonchangeable
changerate of work
able
among the employed
Methods
Prevalence of
of work
nonchangeable
not change- methods of work
able
among the employed
Order of
Prevalence of
tasks not
nonchangeable
changeorder of tasks
able
among the employed
MonotoPrevalence of
nous tasks monotonous
tasks among the
employed
No assisPrevalence of
tance from lack of assiscolleagues tance from colleagues among
the employed
Question in survey:
For each of the following statements please answer Yes or No
You have enough time to get the job done
Question in survey:
Are you able, or not, to choose or change? (yes,
no)
Your speed or rate of work
Question in survey:
Are you able, or not, to choose or change? (yes,
no)
Your methods of work
Question in survey:
Are you able, or not, to choose or change? (yes,
no)
Your order of tasks
Question in survey:
%
Does your main paid job involve, or not (yes, no)
Monotonous tasks
Question in survey:
For each of the following statements please answer Yes or No
You can get assistance from colleagues if required
Table 24. Data for indicators of psychosocial factors (Second European Working Conditions Survey 1997)
Agent
Country
24
Value of
indicator
71
37
71
72
34
76
32
12
32
28
18
37
Unit
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
26 %
14
37
22
17
45
47
22
67
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
10 %
6 %
32 %
Table 25. Indicators of harm due to psychosocial factors (Finnish Work and Health
Surveys 1997 and 2000, Piirainen 1997 and 2000)
Agent
Constrained atmosphere
Indicator
Prevalence of
constrained
atmosphere
among the employed
Prevalence of
little support
from colleagues among
the employed
Prevalence of
little support
from boss
among the employed
Prevalence of
stressful work
among the employed
Hasty
work
Prevalence of
hasty work
among the employed
Definition of indicator
Question in survey:
What kind of atmosphere do you have in your
work? Is it more constrained or unconstrained
and comfortable? (constrained, unconstrained
and comfortable)
Included if constrained
Question in survey:
Can you get support and help from your colleagues when needed? (very much, rather much,
to some extent, rather little, very little)
Included if rather or very little
Question in survey:
Can you get support and help from your boss
when needed? (very much, rather much, to
some extent, rather little, very little)
Included if rather or very little
Question in survey:
Stress means a situation, when you feel nervous
or uneasy or have sleeping difficulties because
of things bothering you all the time. Do you feel
stressed at present? (not at all, little, to some
extent, rather much, very much)
Included if rather or very much
Question in survey:
How often do you have to hurry to get your
work done? (never, rather seldom, every now
and then, rather often, very often)
Included if rather or very often
25
Unit
%
Mentally
heavy
work
Monotonous work
Mental
violence
at work
Prevalence of
mentally heavy
work among
the employed
Prevalence of
monotonous
work among
the employed
Prevalence of
mental violence at work
among the employed
Question in survey:
Is your work mentally light, rather light, to
some extent heavy, rather heavy, heavy?
Included if rather or very heavy
Question in survey:
Is your work very variable, rather variable, not
rather variable but not monotonous, rather monotonous, very monotonous
Included if rather or very monotonous
Question in survey:
Mental violence means constant, repetitive
bullying, oppressing or derogatory treatment.
Have you been before or are you at present an
object of mental violence at work? (no, yes at
present, yes before not at present)
Included if yes
Table 26. Data for indicators of harm due to psychosocial factors in Finland
Agent
Constrained atmosphere
Little support from colleagues
Little support from boss
Stressful work
Hasty work
Mentally heavy work
Monotonous work
Mental violence at work
Year
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Value
20.5
4.5
15.2
13.5
44.8
34.6
7.1
4.3
26
Unit
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Agent
Average
working time
Shiftwork
Working at
night
Working
Sundays
Working Saturdays
Average
commuting
time
Not on flexitime
Working at
least
50h/week (%
of employed)
Indicator
Average weekly
working time in the
main job among the
employed
Prevalence of shiftwork among the employed
Definition of indicator
Question in survey:
How many hours do you usually work
per week, in your main job?
Question in survey:
Do you work shifts (that is, sometimes
working mornings, sometimes afternoons or sometimes nights) or irregular
hours, or not? (If YES) How many
shifts? (no, not working shifts or irregular hours; yes, I work irregular
hours, but not in a shift; yes, 2 shifts;
yes, 3 shifts; yes, 4 shifts; yes, 5 shifts
and over; don't know)
Included if 2 or more shifts
Prevalence of working Question in survey:
at night among the
Normally, how many times a month do
employed
you typically work at night, say for at
least 2 hours between 10.00 pm and
05.00 am?
Included if at least once a month
Prevalence of working Question in survey:
Sundays among the
How many times a month do you typiemployed
cally work on Sundays? (1, 2, 3, 4,
none)
Included if at least once a month
Prevalence of working Question in survey:
Saturdays among the
And on Saturdays? (1, 2, 3, 4, none)
employed
Included if at least once a month
Average daily comQuestion in survey:
muting time among
How many minutes per day do you
the employed
normally spend travelling from home to
work and back in total?
Prevalence of lack of
Question in survey:
flexitime among the
For each of the following statements
employed
please answer Yes or No
You have fixed starting and finishing
times every day
Included if yes
Proportion of the em- Question in survey:
ployed who work at
How many hours do you usually work
least 50 h a week
per week, in your main job?
Included if at least 50 h/week
27
Unit
h/week
%
min/day
Table 28. Data for indicators of working time arrangements (Second European Working Conditions Survey 1997)
Agent
Country
Shiftwork
Working at night
Working Saturdays
Working Sundays
Not on flexitime
28
Value of Unit
indicator
40 h/week
36 h/week
46
19
6
19
33
17
33
50
40
73
43
22
h/week
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
52
41
23
53
%
min/day
min/day
min/day
71 %
58 %
79 %
13 %
8 %
38 %
Indicator
Prevalence of smoking daily among the
employed
Drinking
alcohol at
least once a
week
Drinking
alcohol until
drunk at
least once a
week
Prevalence of light
physical training at
least 3 times/week
among the employed
Definition of indicator
Question in survey:
Do you smoke or have you smoked
earlier?
(has never smoked, smokes daily (or
has quit smoking less then 6 months
ago), smokes but not daily, has quit
smoking more than 6 months ago)
Included if smokes daily
Question in survey:
How often do you drink alcohol on
the average? Include also the times
when you drank small amounts of
alcohol, for example less than a bottle
of beer or a glass of wine (daily, 3
times a week or more often, 2 times a
week, weekly, at least once in a
month, at most few times per year,
never)
Included if at least once a week
Question in survey:
How often do you drink alcohol until
drunk? (daily, 3 times a week or more
often, 2 times a week, weekly, at least
once in a month, at most few times
per year, never)
Included if at least once a week
Question in survey:
How often do you take on average
light exercise, such as walking, cycling or other practical exercise, during your leisure time at least half an
hour which may consist of several
periods? (3 or more times a week, 1
2 times a week, 13 times a month,
few times per year or less, cannot
say)
Included if 3 or more times a week
29
Unit
%
Heavy
physical
training at
least 3
times/week
Prevalence of heavy
physical training at
least 3 times/week
among the employed
No meals
during
workday
Prevalence of no
meals during workday among the employed
Question in survey:
%
How often do you take on average
during your leisure time at least half
an hour such exercise that you become breathless or you sweat? (3 or
more times a week, 12 times a week,
13 times a month, few times per
year or less, cannot say)
Included if 3 or more times a week
Question in survey:
%
Where do you normally eat during
the work day? (at home, in a restaurant or a bar, in the staff canteen, own
lunch, other, dont eat at all)
Included if dont eat at all
Year
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Value
24.5
50.7
7.8
Unit
%
%
%
50.6 %
41.6 %
3.8 %
Indicator
Annual incidence of
fatal accident or traffic accident at work
Injury at
work or
when commuting
Annual incidence of
injury at work or
when commuting
among the employed
Definition of indicator
Cases of fatal accidents and traffic
accidents at work per 100,000 employees; does not include commuting accidents and fatal health
problems at work
Question in survey:
Have you been injured at work or
when commuting during the last
12 months?
Included if yes
30
Unit
Cases per
100,000
employees
%
Injury
causing disability of at
least 3 days
Annual incidence of
injury at work or
when commuting
causing disability of
at least 3 days among
the employed
Question in survey:
Have you been injured at work or
when commuting during the last
12 months? Did the (latest) injury
cause disability? If yes, how many
work days did you have to be absent? (no injury during the last 12
months, no disability, less than 3
days, 330 days, over 30 days)
Included if at least 3 days
Annual incidence of
Accidents of salaried workers at
accidents at workworkplace, or in work site outside
place compensated by workplace (accident insurance
insurance companies compulsory for all salaried workers, voluntary for the selfemployed)
Annual incidence of
Accidents of salaried workers
commuting accidents when commuting between the
compensated by inresidence and workplace
surance companies
Annual incidence of
Serious accident refers to work
serious work accidisability of at least 30 days or fadents compensated by tality
insurance companies
Annual incidence of
Diseases predominantly caused by
occupational diseases occupational exposure to physical,
notified by physicians chemical, microbiological or ergonomic factors
Annual incidence of
Includes mainly cases of epiconrepetitive stress inju- dylitis and tenosynovitis
ries notified by physicians
Annual incidence of
Includes mainly noise-induced
noise-induced hearhearing loss found in audiometric
ing losses notified by tests
physicians
Annual incidence of
Includes mainly cases of asthma,
respiratory allergies
allergic rhinitis and allergic alveonotified by physicians litis
Annual incidence of
Includes mainly cases of toxic or
skin diseases notified allergic eczema
by physicians
Cases per
10,000
employed
31
Cases per
10 million
hours
Cases per
million
hours
Cases per
million
hours
Cases per
10,000
employed
Cases per
10,000
employed
Cases per
10,000
employed
Cases per
10,000
employed
Table 32. Data on indicators of accidents at work and occupational diseases in Finland
Agent
Fatal work accidents
Year
1999
2000
2000
1999
2000
2000
Respiratory allergies
2000
Skin diseases
2000
1999
1999
2000
Value Unit
2.2 Cases per
100,000 employed
9.1 %
4.3 %
29.8 Cases per million hours
2.9 Cases per million hours
2.6 Cases per million hours
2.1 Cases per
10,000 employed
6.4 Cases per
10,000 employed
3.6 Cases per
10,000 employed
2.4 Cases per
10,000 employed
3.9 Cases per
10,000 employed
Work ability
Table 33. Indicators of work ability (Finnish Work and Health Surveys 1997 and 2000,
Piirainen et al. 1997 and 2000)
Agent
Very good
physical
work ability
Indicator
Prevalence of respondents with
very good physical
work ability
Very good
Prevalence of remental work spondents with
ability
very good mental
work ability
Definition of indicator
Unit
Question in survey:
%
Is your current work ability compared to
the physical demands of your current
(latest) work very good, rather good,
moderate, rather poor, very poor?
Included if very good
Question in survey:
%
Is your current work ability compared to
the mental demands of your current
(latest) work very good, rather good,
moderate, rather poor, very poor?
Included if very good
32
Year
2000
2000
Value Unit
33.7 %
28.8 %
Indicator
Prevalence of stress
among the employed
Backache
Prevalence of
backache among
the employed
Overall
fatigue
Headache
Prevalence of
headache among
the employed
Muscular
pain in
arms or
legs
Sleeping
problems
Irritability
Job more
difficult
because of
health
problems
Definition of indicator
Question in survey:
Does your work affect your health, or not? (IF
YES) how does it affect your health?
Yes, stress
Question in survey:
Does your work affect your health, or not? (IF
YES) how does it affect your health?
Yes, backache
Question in survey:
Does your work affect your health, or not? (IF
YES) how does it affect your health?
Yes, overall fatigue
Question in survey:
Does your work affect your health, or not? (IF
YES) how does it affect your health?
Yes, headache
Question in survey:
Does your work affect your health, or not? (IF
YES) how does it affect your health?
Yes, muscular pain in arms or legs
Question in survey:
Does your work affect your health, or not? (IF
YES) how does it affect your health?
Yes, sleeping problems
Question in survey:
Does your work affect your health, or not? (IF
YES) how does it affect your health?
Yes, irritability
Question in survey:
Is your job more difficult for you because of
chronic or permanent health problems? (no,
never; yes, all the time; yes, almost all of the
time; yes, around 3/4 of the time; yes, around
half of the time; yes, around 1/4 of the time;
yes, but hardly ever; don't know)
Included if at least around 1/4 of the time
33
Unit
%
Absenteeism due to
occupational
health
problems
Question in survey:
Over the past 12 months, how many days, if
any, were you absent due to health problems
caused by your main job?
Included if at least one day
Country
Stress
Backache
Overall fatigue
Headache
Muscular pain in arms or
legs
Sleeping problems
Irritability
Job more difficult because of
health problems
Absenteeism due to occupational health problems
Value of
indicator
34
12
50
33
13
44
20
5
57
20
5
24
29
Unit
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
6
37
11
3
11
16
5
18
14
4 %
17 %
30 %
13 %
36 %
34
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%