Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 23

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL

SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI


Application No. 23 of 2014 (SZ)
and
M.A. No. 21 of 2014 (SZ)
Applicant(s)
K. Mari, Ramnagar
Coimbatore

Vs.

Legal Practitioners for Applicant(s)


M/s. M. Samuel Raja and S. Kalai Selvi

Respondent(s)
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu
Pollution Control Board and others

Legal practitioners for respondent(s)


Smt. H. Yasmeen Ali for R-1 and R-2
Ms. J.Hemamalini for R-3.

Note of the Registry

Orders of the Tribunal

Order No.

Date: 9th July, 2014


When the matter is taken up today, the counsel
for the applicant is present.

The counsel for the

respondents 1 and 2 have filed their reply.


Ms.J.Hemamalini, the counsel undertakes to file
vakalat for the 3rd respondent.

Despite the service

of notice, the 4th respondent has not appeared. The


Non-bailable warrant is issued for the production of
the 4th respondent

in the next hearing.

It is

submitted by the counsel for the applicant that


though a show cause notice was served on the 4 th
respondent Unit for closure which was also followed
by an order of closure, the 4th respondent illegally
continues the operation of the Unit. The statement

of the counsel for the applicant is recorded. The 2 nd


respondent is directed to make an inspection and
file a status report in the next hearing.
The matter is posted to 13.8.2014.

Prof. Dr. R. Nagendran


(Expert Member)

Justice M. Chockalingam
(Judicial Member)

BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL


SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI
Application No. 23 of 2014 (SZ)
and
M.A. No. 21 of 2014 (SZ)
Applicant(s)
K. Mari, Ramnagar
Coimbatore

Vs.

Legal Practitioners for Applicant(s)


M/s. M. Samuel Raja and S. Kalai Selvi

Respondent(s)
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu
Pollution Control Board and others

Legal practitioners for respondent(s)


Smt. H. Yasmeen Ali for R-1 and R-2
Ms. J.Hemamalini for R-3.

Note of the Registry

Orders of the Tribunal

Order No.

Date: 9th July, 2014


When the matter is taken up today, the counsel
for the applicant is present.

The counsel for the

respondents 1 and 2 have filed their reply.


Ms.J.Hemamalini, the counsel undertakes to file
vakalat for the 3rd respondent.

Despite the service

of notice, the 4th respondent has not appeared. The


Non-bailable warrant is issued for the production of
the 4th respondent

in the next hearing.

It is

submitted by the counsel for the applicant that


though a show cause notice was served on the 4 th
respondent Unit for closure which was also followed
by an order of closure, the 4th respondent illegally
continues the operation of the Unit. The statement

of the counsel for the applicant is recorded. The 2 nd


respondent is directed to make an inspection and
file a status report in the next hearing.
The matter is posted to 13.8.2014.

Prof. Dr. R. Nagendran


(Expert Member)

Justice M. Chockalingam
(Judicial Member)

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi