Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Aurangabad (Maharashtra),India.
desale.rajendra@gmail.com
sarita verma04@yahoo.com
Cosine
Transform)
and
DWT
(Discrete
(1)
Wavelet
(2)
(3)
above techniques.
The PCA & DCT are conventional fusion techniques with
many drawbacks, whereas DWT based techniques are more
favorable as they provides better results for image fusion.
cov(Y) = VT conv(X)V
(4)
are,
maximum
pixel
replacement
approach.
(5)
gives,
INTRODUCTION
Ai Vi = cov(X) Vi
B.
(7)
arran ged
2,
vector.
analysis, only
the
first
few
Image
I1
Formulation
Let X be a d-dimensional random vector and assume it to
978-1-4673-4862-1/13/$31.00 2013
IEEE
(6)
11.
(5)
Image
12
Figure 1. Image Fusion Process using PCA
2013
(8)
PCA Algorithm
C.
P1-
V(1)
LV
DISCRETE
( nl, n2)cos
Where,
a(kl)
,1
(12)
N2 - 1
(13)
'\'Nl':-O1 Lm2
'\'N2':-O1 a (kl ) a(k2)X(kl, k2)cos (TI(2n1+1)kl)
Lml
2Nl
COS
(TI(2n2+l)k2 )
B.
2N2
(TI(2n1+l)kl )
2Nl
(10)
Kl
kl
Nl - 1
(11)
(14)
DCT
Second
Image
mCT
Fused
... Image
DCT
{ ,
{2
2
..jN1
Nl
k2
2N2
,1
(9)
x(k1,k2)=a(kl )a(k2)
(TI(2n2+l)k2 )
COSINE TRANSFORM
Formulation
Fusion
Rule
"'Nl-l "'N2-l
Lml=O Lm2=O
K2
$,
V(2)
cos
a(k2)
1
,fN2
and P2-"fV
III.
A.
International Conference on Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition [ICSIPRl
DISCRETE
WAVELET TRANSFORM
2013
International Conference on Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition [ICSIPRl
Algorithms
C.
First
Image
Second
Image
Coeff.
Mapl
Coeff.
Map2
/'
Fused
Coeff.
Map
Fused
Image
---+
IDWT
DWT
Figure 3. Image Fusion Process using DWT
Row wise
Input Image
..
HP
filtering
..
..
..
..
Column
wise HP
filtering
..
Column
wise LP
filtering
Column
wise HP
filtering
..
..
..
Row wise
down
sampling
Row wise
down
sampling
(HL)
Row wise
down
sampling
(LH)
(HR)
the two
DWT Decomposition
the two
the two
the two
as new
C.2.
g) Take the average of pixels of the two bands i.e. HHa and
HHb and put in HHn.
h) Take the average of pixels of the two bands i.e. HLa and
HLb, and put in HLn.
i) Take the average of pixels of the two bands i.e. LHa and
LHb, and put in LHn.
j) Take the average of pixels of the two bands i.e. LLa and
LLb, and put in LLn.
i) Thus we will get HHn,HLn,LHn and LLn as new
coefficients.
j) Take Inverse Discrete Wavelet Transform.
k) Obtain the fused Image and Display.
,
Column
wise LP
filtering
..
Row wise
down
sampling
(LL)
V. RESULTS
2013
International Conference on Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition [ICSIPR]
DWT(Pixel Averaging)
Following Table demonstrates the various quality measures for different image fusion techniques.
TABLE I
Fusion Techniques & Their Quality Measures
Quality Measures
Fusion Methods
Peak Signal
to Noise
Ratio
Mean Square
Error
Normalized
Absolute
Error
Maximum
Difference
Average
Difference
Normalized
CrossCorrelation
Structural
Content
PCA
30.7729
54.4246
0.0463
67.9043
-0. I728
0.9989
0.9991
DCT
30.9663
52.0536
0.0441
73.6046
-0.1718
I.OO I 2
0.9945
Pixel
Averaging
78.9555
8.2704e-004
0.0460
0.2647
-6.737ge-004
0.9989
0.9991
Maximum Pixel
Replacement
75.0723
0.0020
0.0695
0.3539
-0.0114
I.O I 69
0.9602
DWT
CONCLUSION
[2]
V.P.S. Naidu and J.R. Raol, "Pixel-level Image Fusion using wavelets
and Principal Component Analysis ," Defence Science Journal, VoI. 58,
No. 3, May 2008, pp. 338-352 02008,DESIDOC.
Nirosha Joshitha J, R. Medona Selin,"lmage Fusion using PCA in
Multifeature Based Palmprint Recognition,"lnternational Journal of
Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE) ISSN: 2231-2307, Volume-2,
Issue-2, May 20 I 2.
[3]
[4]
[5]