Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates the temporal and spatial variability of the seasonal mean of maximum air temperature in Romania
and its links with the largescale atmospheric circulation. The Romanian data sets are represented by time series at 14
stations. The large-scale parameters are represented by the observed sea-level pressure (SLP) and geopotential height at
500 hPa (Z500). The period analysed was 192298 for winter and 196098 for all seasons. Before analysis, the original
temperature data were tested to detect for inhomogeneity using the standard normal homogeneity test. Empirical orthogonal
functions (EOFs) were used to analyse the spatial and temporal variability of the local and large-scale parameters and
to eliminate noise from the original data set. The time series associated with the first EOF pattern of the SLP and mean
maximum temperature in Romania were analysed from trend and shifts point of view using the Pettitt and MannKendall
tests respectively. The covariance map computed using the Z500 and the seasonal mean of maximum temperature in
Romania were used as additional methods to identify the large-scale circulation patterns influencing the local variability.
Significant increasing trends were found for winter and summer mean maximum temperature in Romania, with upward
shifts around 1947 and 1985 respectively. During autumn, a decreasing trend with a downward shift around 1969 was
detected. These changes seem to be real, since they are connected to similar changes in the large-scale circulation. So,
the intensification of the southwesterly circulation over Europe since 1933 overlapped with the enhancement of westerly
circulation after the 1940s could be the reason for the change in winter mean maximum temperature. The slight weakening
of the southwesterly circulation during autumn could be one of the reasons for the decrease in the regime of the mean
maximum temperature for autumn seasons. Additionally, the covariance map technique reveals the influence of the North
Atlantic oscillation in winter, East Atlantic Jet in summer and Scandinavian (or Euroasia-1) circulation pattern in autumn
upon mean maximum air temperature. Copyright 2002 Royal Meteorological Society.
KEY WORDS:
spatio-temporal variability; seasonal maximum temperature; East Atlantic Jet; Scandinavian pattern; Romania
1. INTRODUCTION
Temperature and precipitation are perceived as the key elements of climate. Studies of changes in the evolution
of these parameters have become the subjects of increasing concern in the scientific community. Analysis
of the observed mean surface temperature and precipitation over the last century has revealed significant
changes. The global mean surface air temperature has increased by between about 0.3 and 0.6 C since
the late 19th century, and precipitation over land has generally increased in the extra-tropical areas with
a tendency for rainfall decline in the subtropics (Houghton et al., 1996). Some important features of the
temperature field can be revealed by analysing the extreme values of minimum and maximum temperature.
Karl et al. (1993), using monthly mean maximum and minimum temperatures for over 50% of the Northern
* Correspondence to: Rodica Tomozeiu, ARPAServizio Meteorologico Regionale, Viale Silvani, 6, 40122 Bologna, Italy;
e-mail: r.tomozeiu@smr.arpa.emr.it
1182
Hemisphere landmass, found that the rise in the minimum temperature that has occurred is three times that of
the maximum temperature in the period 195190. Similar results were obtained at a regional scale. Brazdil
et al. (1996), analysing the trends of maximum and minimum temperatures in central and southeastern Europe
for the period 195190, found that the increase in the annual maximum temperature in central Europe is
slightly lower than that of the minimum temperature. Some seasonal characteristics can be remarked upon.
Winter maximum temperature exhibits a significant increase in central Europe, Slovenia and Hungary. In
summer and autumn, maximum temperature also increases in Germany, mid-Switzerland and Austria. The
present study seeks to fill the existing gaps (Romania) concerning the variability of the mean maximum air
temperature in southeastern Europe.
Considerable progress has been made recently in understanding the causes that determine changes in the
mean regime of the main climatic parameters. These changes can be determined by natural forcing, human
activity, or both. In order to establish whether the changes are part of the natural variability of the climate
system or are a response to anthropogenic forcing, information is needed on climate variability on a relevant
time scale. The human influence on climate was shown, for example, among others, by Schonwiese et al.
(1990) and Kaufmann and Stern (1997), who analysed temperature records covering different periods of
time. Numerous studies have proved the influence of general circulation mechanisms on the temperature
or precipitation regimes (Werner and von Storch, 1993; Fu et al., 1999; Yin et al., 2000; Quadrelli et al.,
2001). Similar studies were performed in Romania for mean air temperature and precipitation (Busuioc,
1996; Busuioc and von Storch, 1996), though extreme temperatures have been less well analysed (Busuioc
and Tomozeiu, 1998).
In the present study, an analysis of the seasonal maximum air temperature variability, including trend and
shift point analysis, over Romania is carried out by examining the observed data collected at 14 stations, for
the period covering the interval 192298. Taking into account that the time series have some missing values,
the analysis was also performed for a common period for all seasons (196098). The second aim of this
study is to detect the causes that determine the changes in the seasonal mean of maximum air temperature.
The large-scale circulation pattern influencing the mean maximum temperature variability in Romania was
identified by means of covariance maps. A correlation between the seasonal mean of maximum air temperature
and large-scale circulation indices was also performed.
The paper is organized as follows. After this introduction, Section 2 presents the data set and a brief
description of the methods used in this study. The characteristics of spatial and temporal variability of the
seasonal mean of maximum air temperature from Romania are presented in Section 3. Section 4 includes a
short description of the spatial and temporal variability of the large-scale parameter, represented here by the
sea-level pressure (SLP). The influence of the large-scale circulation upon the mean maximum temperature,
investigated by means of covariance maps, is also described in that section. The conclusions are presented in
Section 5.
0
BAIA MARE
1183
150Km
OCNASUGATAG
IASI
BISTRITA
ROMAN
SIBIU
TIMISOARA
BRASOV
SULINA
TG-JIU
TURNU SEVERIN
BUCURESTI FILARET
CALARASI
CONSTANTA
Figure 1. Map of Romania showing the position of the 14 stations used in this study
used to describe well-known large-scale patterns: North Atlantic oscillation (NAO), East-Atlantic Jet (EAJ)
and Scandinavian (SCAN) pattern. The indices time series used in this paper are from the web pages at
http.//www.cpc.noaa.gov/data/teledoc/telepatcalc.html.
Taking into account that the climatological studies need long homogeneous time series where variations
are caused only by variation of weather or climate, an important problem is to analyse the homogeneity of
the data. The standard normal homogeneity test (SNHT) developed by Alexandersson and Moberg (1997a,b)
is the principal tool used to detect inhomogeneities in the seasonal maximum temperature. The SNHT for
single shifts and trends was applied to the seasonal maximum temperature.
The SNHT for temperature is based upon the assumption that the difference between temperature at the
station being tested (i.e. test station) and the reference series is fairly constant in time. The method used for
the selection of reference stations takes into account the reference stations that are best correlated with the
test station. The correlation coefficient is calculated using the successive increments of the data, instead of the
values themselves. This minimizes the risk of making poor estimates of correlation between the test station
and a reference station, if one or both of them have in-homogeneities within the common time period used
for calculation of the correlation coefficients. The reference series has been constructed as a weighted mean
of the series selected as reference stations, with the correlation coefficient between the test station and the
reference station being the weight.
The results provided by the statistical test were completed with information obtained from metadata. In
Romania, a station history archive exists, but it is not complete, such that a time series was classified as
inhomogeneous if one of the following criteria was satisfied:
the series contains an inhomogeneity significant at the 5% level if it is detected by both (single shift and
trend) tests
the series contains an inhomogeneity significant at the 10% level if it is detected by at least one test and
is explainable by metadata (Hanssen-Bauer et al., 1991).
The SNHT test was used with the following constraint: if a significant break occurred within the first or last
5 years then no correction was made because there are too few years to be able to obtain a stable correction
factor (Hanssen-Bauer et al., 1991).
Various methods are used to analyse spatial and temporal variability. The trend of each time series was
detected by applying the MannKendall test (Sneyers, 1975), whereas changes of the seasonal mean of
maximum temperature were detected by the Pettitt test (Pettitt, 1979).
Copyright 2002 Royal Meteorological Society
1184
The Pettitt test says that the series X1 , . . . , XT has a change point at moment if Xt for t = 1, . . . , has a
common distribution function F1 (x), and Xt for t = + 1, . . . , T as a common distribution function F2 (x),
and F1 (x) = F2 (x).
The null hypothesis of no change is tested against the alternative hypothesis of change using the
non-parametric statistic (Pettitt, 1979):
kT+ = max Ut,T for downward shift
1tT
and
kT = min Ut,T for upward shift
1tT
where
Ut,T =
t
T
Di,j
i=1 j =t+1
On the null hypothesis, the distribution of Ut,T is symmetric about zero for each t.
The significance levels associated with the value k + or k are given approximately by the formula (Pettitt,
1979):
2
p = exp 6 k
T3 +T2
After finding a main change point, the time series were divided into two sub-series, each of them being tested
separately, looking for new change points. The analysis is repeated until the sub-series produced becomes
stationary. Only the period without missing values was selected. This period covers the 192298 interval for
the winter season and a common period for all seasons, namely 196098.
It should mentioned that Pettitts test is sensitive to the presence of trends, which causes the test to reject the
null hypothesis too often (Busuioc and von Storch, 1996). To exclude such artificial signals, the application
of Pettitts test to pairs of physically linked variables is recommended. This procedure will be applied in
this paper.
To investigate the spatial variability of the seasonal mean of maximum temperature, an empirical orthogonal
function (EOF) analysis was carried out. This procedure provides a method for studying the spatial and
temporal variability of long time series over large areas. The method splits the temporal variance of the
original data into orthogonal spatial patterns called empirical eigenvectors (EOFs) (Wilks, 1995; von Storch,
1995). Each eigenvector is associated with a series of time coefficients that describes the time evolution (PCs)
of the particular spatial mode. In this paper, the EOFs are defined as the eigenvectors of the correlation matrix
derived from the anomalies (computed by subtracting the long-term mean from the data) of the original data
set. The contribution of any component to the total variance in the field is given by the associated eigenvalue,
which provides a measure of its relative importance (Wilks, 1995).
The temporal variability of the time series associated with the main EOF modes (PCs) was investigated, the
results being compared with those obtained at each station. In this way the performance of the EOF analysis
to extract the signal from data set is proved. Therefore, in the further analysis the time series associated with
a few EOFs are used instead of time series at the 14 stations.
In order to detect the reasons, which could lead to changes in the seasonal mean of maximum temperature
in Romania, the EOF analysis was performed for the large-scale parameter represented by the SLP. The time
series (PCs) associated with the first two EOF patterns were analysed from the trend and shift point of view,
the results being compared with those obtained by analysing the temperature field. If simultaneous changes
in the local and large-scale parameters were found, this could lead to the idea that the changes at the large
scale determine the changes at the local scale.
Copyright 2002 Royal Meteorological Society
1185
The relationship between regional surface data and large-scale upper-air fields has been investigated by
means of covariance maps computed using the PCs of the seasonal anomalies of mean maximum temperature
and the geopotential height at 500 hPa (Z500) from 1960 to 1998. The second method used to detect the
main large-scale circulation patterns, which could influence the seasonal mean of maximum temperature in
Romania, is based on the correlation between the temperature PCs and the indices associated with the pattern
provided by the covariance maps.
One of the most important patterns controlling the climate in the AtlanticEuropean region is the NAO.
This pattern, which is most clearly identified during the cold months, was firstly identified in the SLP field.
It has also been found in the middle troposphere (Barnston and Livezey, 1987). The NAO combines parts of
the East Atlantic and West Atlantic patterns, and consists of a northsouth dipole of anomalies. One centre
is located over Greenland and the other one of opposite sign spans the central latitudes of the North Atlantic
between 35 N and 40 N.
The EAJ pattern is another important mode of low-frequency variability found over the North Atlantic,
appearing between April and August. This pattern consists of a northsouth dipole structure of anomaly
centres, with one main centre located over the high latitudes of the eastern North Atlantic and Scandinavia, and
the other centre located over Northern Africa and the Mediterranean Sea (http.//www.cpc.noaa.gov/data/teledoc/telepatcalc.html).
SCA, or Euroasia-1 as referred to by Barnston and Livezey (1987), is a prominent mode of low-frequency
variability that appears in all months except June and July. This pattern consists of a primary centre, which
spans Scandinavia and large portions of the Arctic Ocean north of Siberia. Two additional weaker centres
with opposite sign to the Scandinavian centre are located over Western Europe and over the Mongolia area.
1186
Baia Mare
Bistrita
Brasov
Bucuresti
Calarasi
Constanta
Iasi
Ocna Sugatag
Roman
Sibiu
Sulina
Timisoara
Tg.Jiu
Turnu Severin
Winter Period
Mann-Kendall
statistics
Trend
( C/decade)
195098
194598
192298
187798
192298
192298
192298
192298
192298
192298
194698
192298
192298
192298
0.6
0.5
3.4
4.3
3.1
2.9
2.1
0.5
0.6
3.4
1.0
1.7
2.3
3.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
Taking into account the results presented above, a change point analysis (Pettitt test) was performed for
the seasons that showed a significant trend, namely: winter, summer and autumn. A significant upward shift
was detected in winter around 1947 at all stations, except Baia Mare, Bistrita and Sulina. Summer mean
maximum temperature exhibits an upward shift around 1985 (less significant at Bistrita and Iasi stations),
and autumn reveals a significant downward shift point around 1969. An example of a change point detected
in winter (a), summer (b) and autumn (c) at Calarasi station is presented in Figure 2. Using the shift point
detected by Pettitt-test-like criteria, each seasonal time series was divided into two sub-series and the Pettitt
test was applied again. The analysis performed for the sub-series did not reveal significant changes.
3.2. Spatial variability of seasonal maximum air temperature in Romania
The characteristics of spatial variability of seasonal mean maximum temperature are provided by the EOF
analysis. Taking into account the results obtained by analysing the seasonal temperature time series for each
station (Section 3.1), the EOF technique was applied only for seasons with significant changes (winter, summer
and autumn). The EOF analysis was performed over the 192298 interval for winter temperature and over the
196098 for all seasons using the complete data set. In order to test the robustness of the EOF decomposition,
the method was also applied for summer and autumn temperatures over the long period (192298), but for
less stations because of missing data. The patterns for both periods are very similar, confirming their stability.
The patterns provided by this method show the main spatial features of the mean maximum temperature
variability (namely the areas with the same climate variability), whereas their coefficient time series (PCs)
describe the dominant time variability in the data set. Table III presents the variance explained by the first
three EOFs corresponding to the winter, summer and autumn seasons.
The first EOF pattern is characterized by the same sign in all seasons, with higher values (that means higher
variability) in the region situated inside of the Carpathian chain (intra-Carpathian area). The second EOF
pattern presents a dipolar structure in all seasons, showing the topography influence (Carpathian Mountains)
on the temperature distribution. Thus, two regions, intra-Carpathian and extra-Carpathian, placed inside and
outside of the Carpathian chain, with opposite sign of variability are revealed. As an example, the patterns
of the first two EOFs for the autumn mean maximum temperature are presented in Figure 3. Similar results
(not shown) were obtained for winter and summer mean maximum temperatures.
Copyright 2002 Royal Meteorological Society
Baia Mare
Bistrita
Brasov
Bucuresti
Calarasi
Constanta
Iasi
Ocna Sugatag
Roman
Sibiu
Sulina
Timisoara
Tg.Jiu
Turnu Severin
Station
1.0
0.3
1.1
1.8
1.5
1.2
1.6
0.7
2.9
1.2
1.0
0.9
2.6
2.5
Mann-Kendall
statistics
0.3
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.5
Trend
( C/decade)
Winter 196098
0.4
0.4
0.3
1.0
0.8
1.6
0.6
0.1
0.8
0.4
0.6
0.3
1.4
1.8
Mann-Kendall
statistics
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.2
Trend
( C/decade)
Spring 196098
0.9
0.8
2.2
1.8
2.4
2.4
0.6
1.3
0.2
1.5
2.0
0.7
2.1
1.7
Mann-Kendall
statistics
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
Trend
( C/decade)
Summer 196098
0.4
3.0
2.5
1.5
1.9
1.9
2.8
2.6
2.3
3.1
2.5
2.5
2.4
1.8
Mann-Kendall
statistics
0.2
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
Trend
( C/decade)
Autumn 196098
Table II. The results of trend analysis (MannKendall statistics) of the seasonal mean of maximum air temperature in Romania during the 196098 period. The
significant results are marked in bold type (0.05 significance level)
1187
1188
10.0
8.0
6.0
T(C)
4.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
1947
4.0
1922
1932
1942
1952
1962
1972
1982
1992
Years
(b)
31.0
30.0
T(C)
29.0
28.0
1985
27.0
26.0
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
Years
(c)
22.0
T(C)
20.0
18.0
16.0
19 69
14.0
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
Years
Figure 2. Shift points in the mean maximum air temperature at Calarasi station during winter (a), summer (b), and autumn (c) seasons
Table III. The variance explained by the first three EOFs corresponding to winter,
summer autumn seasons
Season
Period of analysis
EOF 1 (%)
EOF 2 (%)
EOF 3 (%)
Winter
Summer
Autumn
192298
196098
196098
84.8
71.7
80.6
6.4
11.9
9.4
4.0
4.7
3.1
The time coefficient series (PC1 and PC2) associated with the first two EOF patterns corresponding to
winter, summer and autumn were analysed from the trend and change points of view. Figure 4 displays
the temporal evolution of the PC1 for winter (a), summer (b) and autumn (c). A significant increasing
trend (MannKendall test) was detected in winter and summer, whereas in the autumn season a significant
decreasing trend is noted. The Pettitt test applied to the above PCs shows shifts similar to those presented for
Copyright 2002 Royal Meteorological Society
1189
(a)
OCNASUGATAG
1.15
BAIA MARE
1.23
BISTRITA
1.32
SIBIU
1.34
1.26
TIMISOARA
1.34
IASI
ROMAN
1.25
1.28
BRASOV
TG-JIU 1.09
TURNU SEVERIN
0.9
SULINA
0.9
BUCURESTI FILARET
1.1
CALARASI
1.17
CONSTANTA
0.8
(b)
OCNASUGATAG
0.54
BAIA MARE
0.64
BISTRITA
0.57
0.19
SIBIU
TIMISOARA
0.32
0.35
IASI
ROMAN
0.4
0.15
BRASOV
SULINA
0.27
TG-JIU 0.14
TURNU SEVERIN
0.27
0.51
BUCURESTI FILARET
CALARASI
0.37
CONSTANTA
0.44
Figure 3. The first (a) and second (b) EOF pattern of the mean maximum air temperature during the autumn season
the individual station time series. A similar analysis was performed for PC2 corresponding to each season, the
results being statistically insignificant. In order to find a physical explanation for the changes detected in the
mean maximum temperature in Romania during winter, summer and autumn, the large-scale SLP variability
was investigated. Therefore, the EOF analysis for the SLP on a European scale for the above seasons was
also done. The results are presented in Section. 4
4. CONNECTION BETWEEN SEASONAL MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE IN ROMANIA AND
LARGE-SCALE CIRCULATION
4.1. Spatial variability of seasonal SLP at European scale provided by EOF technique
The EOF analysis was performed for European SLP, in winter, summer and autumn seasons. The first
EOF pattern in wintertime over the 192298 interval (not shown), which explains 51% of the total variance,
represents a southwesterly circulation over Romania. The PC1 associated with this pattern reveals an increasing
trend with an upward shift around 1933. This result leads to the idea that, starting in 1933, the southwesterly
circulation over Europe was more frequent. The results are in agreement with those obtained by Busuioc
and von Storch (1996), where the SLP from 190187 was analysed. In a previous paper, Busuioc and
Tomozeiu (1998), using canonical correlation analysis, suggested a physically plausible mechanism to explain
Copyright 2002 Royal Meteorological Society
1190
PC1_winter
1
0
1
2
3
1922
1932
1942
1952
1962
1972
1982
1992
1990
1995
Years
PC1_summer
(b)
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
Years
(c)
PC1_autumn
2
1
0
1
2
3
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
Years
Figure 4. Coefficient time series of the first EOF (PC1) for: winter (a), summer (b) and autumn (c). The means of two sub-intervals
determined by the shift point are also marked
the changes in the winter mean of maximum temperature in Romania, namely an increase of the frequency
of the westerly circulations around the 1940s. This mechanism was enhanced by that mentioned above
(i.e. an intensification of the southwesterly circulation after the 1930s as well), which mostly affects the
extra-Carpathian areas, and may justify the warming being more marked in these areas.
The first EOF pattern of the summer SLP, computed for the period 196098, which explains 38% of the
total variance, reveals a easterlynortheasterly circulation over the Romanian territory (Figure 5(a)) given by
the positive anomaly field over Europe. The analysis of the time series associated with this pattern (PC1)
reveals a slightly increasing trend (Figure 5(b)).
The first EOF pattern of the autumn SLP, which explains 47% of the total variance (Figure 6(a)), suggests
a southwesterly circulation over Romania. The PC1 associated with the above configuration (Figure 6(b))
presents a slightly decreasing trend and a downward shift point around 1968 (0.1 significance level).
Copyright 2002 Royal Meteorological Society
54N
52N
50N
48N
46N
44N
42N
40N
38N
36N
34N
32N
30N
0.5
0.7
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
5E
(b)
1191
3
2
PC1
1
0
1
2
3
1960
1964
1968
1972
1976
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
Years
Figure 5. The pattern of the first EOF (a) and the temporal evolution of the PC1 (b) computed for summer SLP field
Therefore, considering the explanation presented above, the increasing trend detected in the summer
mean maximum temperature could be due to a slight intensification of the easterlynortheasterly circulation
(carrying a warm and dry continental air mass). The downward shift point in the autumn mean maximum
temperature detected around 1969 could be due to a slight decrease in the frequency of the southwesterly
circulation, especially after 1968. These conclusions are further corroborated when the link between PC1 of
summer/autumn mean maximum temperature and circulation indices is analysed. These results are presented
below.
The changes in seasonal mean maximum temperature in Romania (winter, summer and autumn) presented
in this section were explained by changes in the first mode of the atmospheric circulation variability on the
European scale given by the EOF analysis. For the winter season an additional explanation was given by
Busuioc and Tomozeiu (1998) using canonical correlation analysis, which selects optimum correlated spatial
patterns.
In the following, the changes detected in seasonal maximum temperature are additionally explained by
investigating the relationship between seasonal maximum temperature and upper air fields by means of
covariance maps computed using the first two temperature PCs and the 500 hPa geopotential height. The
method is also applied for winter season, even if the period 196098 could not catch the shift point detected
around 1947. The idea is to identify the main patterns that could influence the variability of maximum winter
temperature in Romania. An interesting result is related by the covariance map of PC1 and winter Z500
anomaly (Figure 7). This pattern closely resembles one of the dominant European patterns, namely the NAO.
A good correlation was found between the winter NAO index and the PC1 temperature (196098 period),
namely 0.54 (0.02 significance level); this confirms the possible influence on the winter Romanian climate.
Hurrell (1995) analysed the decadal trends in the NAO and revealed a strong positive NAO index in recent
decades. This is connected to a reinforcement of the westerlies in the northeast Atlantic and a warmer winter
than normal.
Copyright 2002 Royal Meteorological Society
1192
54N
52N
50N
48N
46N
44N
42N
40N
38N
36N
34N
32N
32N
5E
(b)
10E
15E
20E
25E
1968
1972
30E
35E
40E
45E
50E
1980
1984
1988
1992
1996
PC1
2
1
0
1
2
1960
1964
1976
Years
Figure 6. As Figure 5, but for autumn season
140E
160E
180E
150E
140E
10
0
120W
120E
10
0
100W
100E
80W
80E
60N
0
0
10
20 40N
60W
60E
10
10
20N
60W
20W
20E
40E
Figure 7. The covariance map between PC1 and Z500 winter season
(a)
160W
180
160E
1193
140E
120E
120W
0
4
100W
100E
80N
80E
80W
60N
0
60W
60E
40N
0
0
20N
40W
(b)
20W
20E
40E
2.0
1.5
EAJ_index
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
Years
Figure 8. (a) The covariance map between PC1 and Z500 summer season; (b) trends and shift point in the EAJ index time series
Figure 8(a) presents the covariance map between the Z500 (summer) and the first PC of mean maximum
air temperature. This structure bears some resemblance to the positive phase of the EAJ, with one (negative)
centre over the far eastern North Atlantic and Scandinavia and the other one (positive) over Eastern Europe,
influencing also the Mediterranean area. Romania is included in the area with high positive coefficients;
this means that large values of mean maximum temperature in Romania tend to be associated with large
values of Z500 in southern Europe and small values of Z500 in the eastern North Atlantic and Scandinavia.
The correlation coefficient computed between the EAJ summer index and PC1 of the summer maximum air
temperature is 0.5. The trend test (MannKendall) applied to the EAJ summer index (Figure 8(b)) shows
a significant increasing trend (0.05 significance level) and the Pettitt test reveals a significant upward shift
around 1984 (0.05 significance level). The period 198693 is characterized by the positive phase of the EAJ
(Figure 8(b)). The persistence of the positive phase of the EAJ pattern reflects an intensification of westerlies
over central latitudes in the eastern North Atlantic and over almost the whole of Europe. Therefore, the
increase detected in the summer mean maximum temperature, and the corresponding change point around
1985, could be due to more frequent positive phases of the EAJ, especially after 1984.
Copyright 2002 Royal Meteorological Society
1194
The covariance map between the autumn Z500 and the first PC of mean maximum temperature (Figure 9(a))
closely resembles the positive phase of the SCAN pattern, or Euroasia-1 as referred to by Barnston and
Livezey (1987). The pattern has one centre situated at 6070 N, 3050 E. Two additional weaker centres
with opposite sign to those of the SCAN ones are located at 4050 N, 70110 E and 5055 N, 10 E20 W.
The correlation coefficient between the SCAN index and PC1 of autumn maximum temperature is 0.45.
The positive phase of this pattern is associated with positive height anomalies, sometimes reflecting major
blocking anticyclones over Scandinavia and western Russia, whereas the negative phase of the pattern is
associated with negative height anomalies over these regions. The index of the SCAN pattern (Figure 9(b))
reveals a significant negative trend during the 196098 period and a downward change point around 1968,
similar to those obtained for the mean maximum temperature in Romania. Therefore, changes in the mean
maximum air temperature in Romania during the autumn season could be due to more frequent negative
phases of the SCAN pattern after 1968.
(a)
160 E
150
180 E
140 E
140 E
120 W
120 E
7.5
0
7.5
100 W
100 E
7.5
80 N
80 W
80 E
7.5
60 N
7.5
0
0
7.5
60 W
60 E
40 N
20 N
20 W
(b)
2.0
Scandinavian index
40 W
1.0
40 E
20 E
0.0
1.0
2.0
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
Years
Figure 9. (a) As in Figure 7, but for autumn season; (b) trends and shift point in the SCAN index time series
Copyright 2002 Royal Meteorological Society
1195
NCEP reanalysis data were provided by the NOAACIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, Boulder, CO, USA,
from their website at http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/. One of the authors, Rodica Tomozeiu, undertook this work
with the support of the ICTP Programme for Training and Research in Italian Laboratories, Trieste, Italy.
The helpful comments of two anonymous reviewers are appreciated.
REFERENCES
Alexandersson H, Moberg A. 1997a. Homogenization of Swedish temperature data. Part I. A homogeneity test for linear trends.
International Journal of Climatology 17: 2534.
Alexandersson H, Moberg A. 1997b. Homogenization of Swedish temperature data. Part II. Homogenized gridded air temperature
compared with a subset of global gridded air temperature since 1861. International Journal of Climatology 17: 3554.
Barnston A, Livezey R. 1987. Classification, seasonality persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns. Monthly Weather
Review 115: 10831126.
1196
Busuioc A. 1996. Estimation of the effect of CO2 concentration doubling upon winter air temperature in Romania. Romanian Journal
of Meteorology 3(1): 2333.
Busuioc A, Tomozeiu R. 1998. Connection between the winter mean maximum temperature variability in Romania and the large scale
circulation. Romanian Journal of Meteorology 5(12): 2937.
Busuioc A, von Storch H. 1996. Changes in the winter precipitation in Romania its relation to the large scale circulation. Tellus A 48:
538552.
Fu C, Diaz HF, Dong D, Fletcher JO. 1999. Changes in atmospheric circulation over Northern Hemisphere oceans associated with the
rapid warming of the 1920s. International Journal of Climatology 19: 581606.
Hanssen-Bauer I, Forl E, Nordli PO. 1991. Homogeneity test of precipitation data, descriptions of the methods used at DNMI. DNMI
Report 13/91 Norwegian Meteorological Institute; 28 pp.
Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (eds). 1996. Climate Change 1995. The Science of
Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge/New York.
Hurrell JW. 1995. Decadal trends in the North Atlantic oscillation, regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269: 676679.
Karl TR, Jones PD, Knight RW, Kukla G, Plummer N, Razuvayev V, Gallo KP, Lindsea J, Charlson RJ, Peterson TC. 1993. A new
perspective on recent global warming. Asymmetric trends of daily maximum and minimum temperature. Bulletin of the American
Meteorological Society 74: 10071023.
Kaufmann RK, Stern DI. 1997. Evidence for human influence on climate from hemispheric temperature relations. Nature 388: 3944.
Pettitt AN. 1979. A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem. Applied Statistics 28(2): 126135.
Quadrelli R, Lazzeri M, Cacciamani C, Tibaldi S. 2001. Observed winter alpine precipitation variability and links with large-scale
circulation patterns. Climate Research 17: 275284.
Schonwiese CD, Stahler U, Birrong W. 1990. Temperature precipitation trends in Europe their possible link with greenhouse-induced
climatic change. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 41: 173175.
Sneyers R. 1975. Sur lanalyse statistique des series dobservations. Note technique OMM, 143; 189 pp.
Trenberth KE, Paolino DA. 1980. The Northern Hemisphere sea-level pressure data set. Trends, errors discontinuities. Monthly Weather
Review 108: 855872.
von Storch H. 1995. Spatial patterns. EOFs and CCA. In Analysis of Climate Variability. Application of Statistical Techniques, von
Storch H, Navarra A (eds). Springer Verlag: 227258.
Werner P, von Storch H. 1993. Interannual variability of central European mean temperature in JanuaryFebruary its relation to largescale circulation. Climate Research 3: 195207.
Wilks SD. 1995. Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. International Geophysics Series, vol. 59. Academic Press: 467 pp.
Yin Z-Y, Lin Z, Zhao X. 2000. Temperature anomalies in central eastern Tibetan plateau in relation to general circulation patterns
during 19511993. International Journal of Climatology 20: 14311449.