Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Problem
The aim of this tutorial is to provide the reader with instructions for
modeling triaxial tests on sand in Phase2. The material properties for the
sands are often not provided in the published results for these triaxial
tests. Therefore, the tutorial will begin by explaining the procedure for
using the experimental data to derive the values of these properties.
Following this, the process of building the model in Phase2, as well as
incorporating the loading conditions of the triaxial test will be described.
Kolymbas and Wu [1] performed a series of triaxial tests on a variety of
samples of granular materials; this included drained triaxial tests on
loose Karlsruhe sand. In Fundamentals of Plasticity in Geomechanics
[2], Pietruszczak presents the experimental results of undrained triaxial
tests on several different sands, including samples of very loose Banding
sand. Both references did not provide the material properties for the
sands being used. This tutorial will provide the reader with instructions
for modeling these triaxial tests in Phase2.
Material Properties
As previously mentioned, the material properties for the sands used in
the triaxial tests were not provided in [1] and [2]. However, the
experimental data can be used to derive the key parameters. These
parameters are the cohesion, friction angle, dilation angle and the
hardening parameter. The process used involved plotting a failure line (pq), using the experimental data to calculate the friction angle and
cohesion, and plotting the tangential friction angle against the deviatoric
stress to approximate the hardening parameter B.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
(1)
Next, the mean stress was calculated using the minor principal stress
and the deviatoric stress (q) with the following equation.
(2)
The deviatoric stress at failure was plotted against the mean stress at
failure for each of the different confining pressure tests being examined.
This is shown in the following figure. A best-fit line was determined using
Microsoft Excel and the equation is shown below.
1.2381
19.315
(3)
(4)
Where
(5)
is equal to , which simplifies the
(6)
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
1.2381
3
30.9
Cohesion
19.315
tan
19.315 tan
19.135 3 sin
6 cos
9.3
Thus, the failure line was plotted using the results of these tests and the
equation of the line was used to determine the friction angle and the
cohesion of the Karlsruhe sand.
Since the graph of volumetric strain versus axial strain for the Karlsruhe
sand did not show any dilation behavior, the value of the friction angle
was set at a value slightly less than the peak friction angle. A value of 30
was selected for the dilation angle.
Plotting the Hardening Behavior
The last parameter needed to model the behavior of the Karlsruhe sand is
the Hardening parameter. The hardening parameter can be determined
by creating a plot of the tangential friction angle versus the deviatoric
strain, and using the equation of the best fit curve to solve for the
required parameter.
The Mohr-Coulomb hardening equation from [2] is:
tan
tan
(7)
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
(9)
The second value needed to plot the hardening behavior is the tangential
friction angle corresponding to each deviatoric strain value calculated
using Equation 8. At each point, the mean stress (p) and deviatoric stress
(q) values (calculated using equations 1 and 2) can be used to determine
the value of M using Equation 4, and the values of cohesion and failure
friction angle that have been previously calculated.
Next, the value of the tangential friction angle at each point can be
calculated by substituting the value of M calculated at each point into
Equation 5. The tangent of these friction angles will be used in the plot of
hardening behavior.
The following figure shows a plot of the tangential friction angle versus
the deviatoric strain for all of the different confining pressure tests
conducted.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Figure 4: Hardening behavior for the triaxial tests with the best fit curve
In this example, the value of the hardening parameter that produced the
best fit curve was determined to be B = 0.0075.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Figure 5: Graph of Deviatoric stress versus Mean Stress for the Banding
sand triaxial test.
This linear segment represents the failure line. Therefore, a point on this
failure line was selected (p = 100 kPa and q = 125 kPa) and plotted in p-q
space. Since this is a very loose sand, it was assumed that cohesion is
zero and thus the failure line passes through the origin. The failure line
was created by drawing a line that passes through the point and the
origin. The failure line is shown in the following figure:
1.25
Phase2 v.9.0
(10)
Tutorial Manual
The same procedure used for the drained test was used to solve the
material properties in this example.
Friction Angle
6 sin
3 sin
1.25
sin
31.1
Cohesion
0
tan
0
Thus, the peak friction angle for the Banding sand was determined to be
31.1. As previously mentioned, since the line passes through the origin
the cohesion is zero.
Similar to the Karlsruhe sand, no dilation behavior was observed in the
plot of volumetric strain versus axial strain given in [2]. Therefore the
dilation angle was set as 31.1, equal to the friction angle.
Plotting the Hardening Behavior
Once again, a plot of tangential friction angle versus deviatoric strain
was created in order to calculate the hardening parameter. The MohrCoulomb hardening equation is given in Equation 7. Once again, it was
assumed that the elastic strain is essentially zero and thus the plastic
deviatoric strain is approximately equal to the total deviatoric strain.
It is important to note that since the tests are undrained and the pore
water is not allowed to escape, no compaction can occur and thus
volumetric strain is zero.
The lateral strain was calculated using Equation 8:
(8)
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
(4)
Figure 9: Hardening behavior for the triaxial test on the Banding sand
sample
Once again, the value of the hardening parameter (B) was varied in the
hardening equation (Equation 7) until a best-fit curve was obtained for
the data. A value of B = 0.0075 was determined to provide the best fit; the
curve is shown in the figure below.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Figure 10: Hardening behavior for the triaxial test on the Banding sand
sample along with the best fit curve.
KarlsruheSand
FailureFrictionAngle
30.9
Cohesion
9.3kPa
HardeningParameter(B)
0.0075
Table1:SummaryofMaterialPropertiesforthelooseKarlsruhesand.
BandingSand
FailureFrictionAngle
31.1
Cohesion
0kPa
HardeningParameter(B)
0.0075
Table2:SummaryofMaterialPropertiesfortheBandingsand.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Model
Thefollowingsectionofthistutorialwilldescribetheprocessfor
constructingamodelinPhase2thatwillreplicatethetriaxialtestsfrom[1]
and[2].Thisprocessincludesenteringthemodelgeometryandloading
conditionsfromthetriaxialtestingsetup,aswellasenteringthecorrect
materialpropertiesforthesandsbeingused.
Project Settings
Open the Project Settings dialog from the Analysis menu and select
the General tab. Select Axisymmetric for the analysis type.
Select the Stages tab. Change the number of stages to 51 as shown in the
following figure.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Geometry
As previously mentioned, an axisymmetric analysis is being performed.
The Phase2 model therefore consists of an axisymmetric cylinder with
unit height. This will appear as a 1m by 1m square in Phase2.
Mesh
Add the finite element mesh by selecting Mesh Setup from the Mesh
menu. In the mesh setup dialog, change the Element Type to 8 Noded
Quadrilaterals.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Loading
Triaxial tests on sand are performed by applying a hydrostatic confining
pressure on the sample and then applying an axial load. The confining
stress can be modelled in Phase2 by applying a constant field stress with
a constant distributed uniform load on the boundaries.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
This uniform load is applied to the top and right edges of the Phase2
model as these correspond to the surface of the axisymmetric cylinder.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Boundary Conditions
In these models, the boundary conditions must be set in order to replicate
the triaxial testing conditions. Since this is an axisymmetric analysis, the
left edge of the model will be restrained in the X direction. The bottom
edge is restrained in the Y direction.
In order to produce the loading conditions from the triaxial testing,
incremental displacements will be applied. The total axial strain from
these tests can easily be converted to a displacement since the model has
a unit height; this displacement will then be divided over the 50 loading
stages and applied to the model incrementally.
Drained Triaxial Test
An incremental vertical displacement was applied to the model in the
drained triaxial test, and the right edge of the model was left as a free
surface. The maximum axial strain observed in the tests on the
Karlsruhe sand was 20%, which corresponds to a displacement of 0.2m
for a model with unit height. This displacement was divided evenly into
50 increments, so a displacement of 0.004m was applied in each stage.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Next, click on the Stage Factor tab and set the stage factors as follows.
This corresponds to an incremental stage factor of 1/50 or 0.02 per stage.
Select the three nodes on the top surface of the model and hit enter to
apply these displacements. The following figure shows the first
displacement increment applied to the model.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
The displacement increments are not identical in all of the stages, as they
were in the drained triaxial test model. Instead, smaller increments have
been used in the early stages, while larger increments are used in the
later stages. Click on the Stage Factors button. The following figure
shows the stage factors used for the first 25 stages.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Click on the Stage Factors button. The stage factors used will be identical
to those used for the displacements of the top edge of the model.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Click on the Stage Factors button. Once again, we will be using the same
stage factors.
The following figure shows the first incremental displacement applied to
the Banding sand model.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Materials
Drained Triaxial Test
Click on Model Properties, and select the Cone Property tab in the Model
Properties dialog. The hardening and dilation parameters will be entered
in this window. The hardening parameter (B=0.0075) determined earlier
in the tutorial is entered as the Hardening Property. Next, the dilation
angle (30) is entered.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Click on Model Properties, and select the Cone Property tab in the Model
Properties dialog. The hardening and dilation parameters will be entered
in this window. The hardening parameter (B=0.0075) determined earlier
in the tutorial is entered as the Hardening Property. Next, the dilation
angle (31.5) is entered.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Compute
Now that the material properties and loading conditions have been
entered, the results can now be computed. Before you analyze your
model, save this as a new file called TriaxialSandTest.fez
Interpret
From Model, switch to the Interpret program.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Click the Plot button and the following graph will appear.
Right click on the graph and click Copy Data, then you will be able to
paste the data in Microsoft Excel.
Repeat the steps above to obtain the data for Sigma 3 and Absolute
Vertical Displacement. We can then use Microsoft Excel to calculate the
Deviatoric Stress, by finding the difference between Sigma 1 and Sigma
3. As previously mentioned, since our model has a unit height, the
absolute vertical displacement is equal to the axial strain. Thus, we now
have the Deviatoric Stress and Axial Strain values for each stage.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
In the figure below, the curves of Deviatoric Stress versus Axial Strain
from the Phase2 model results at different confining stresses have been
plotted along with the experimental data, in order to compare the two
sets of results. As seen in the figure, the two sets of results are in close
agreement.
Graph of Stress Ratio versus Axial Strain for the experimental data and
the Phase2 model results for the loose Karlsruhe sand.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
Now that we have the Phase2 model results for deviatoric stress and
deviatoric strain at each stage, we can compare the results with the
experimental data. The following figure compares the two sets of results;
once again they are in close agreement. There are some differences
between the two sets of data; this may be due to the fact that the Phase2
model uses a constant value of Youngs modulus, while in reality the
value varies with stress.
Conclusion
This aim of this tutorial has been to provide the reader with step by step
instructions for using Phase2 to model triaxial tests on sand in both
drained and undrained conditions, beginning with deriving the material
properties for the sand, and subsequently modeling the loading conditions
and geometry of the triaxial test in Phase2.
As shown in the Phase2 verification file Drained and Undrained Triaxial
Tests on Sand, Phase2 can be used to model triaxial tests on a number of
different sands. These include drained triaxial tests on dense and loose
Karlsruhe sand [1], loose Ottawa sand [3], dense and loose Hostun Sand
[4], as well as undrained triaxial tests on Banding sand and loose Reid
Bedford sand [2]. It is left as an exercise for the reader to attempt to build
these other models in Phase2.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual
References
[1] D. Kolymbas and W. Wu (1990), Recent Results of Triaxial Tests with
Granular Materials, Powder Technology, 60, 99-119.
[2] S. Pietruszczak (2010), Fundamentals of Plasticity in Geomechanics,
Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press.
[3] K. Alshibli and S. Sture (2000), Shear Band Formation in Plane
Strain Experiments of Sand, Journal of Geotechnical and
Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126, 495-503.
[4] T. Schanz and P.A. Vermeer (1996), Angles of friction and dilatancy
of sand, Gotechnique, 46, 145-151.
Phase2 v.9.0
Tutorial Manual