Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Voting and
Elections
Study
Guide
Study Guide for Voting and
Elections topic, featuring notes
for all sub- topics, practice
exam questions and key dates
for exams.
Primaries
What are Primaries?
Primaries, in all shapes and forms, choose the next presidential candidate
for the particular party. There are many different types of primary:
o Closed Primaries in this type of primary, only members of the particular
party in question may vote, i.e. Republican members vote in Republican
primaries, Democrat members vote in Democrat primaries. Non- affiliated
people may vote in either of the primaries of their choosing
o Open Primaries in this type of primary, all registered voters are allowed to
take part, regardless of their political affiliation. People may still vote in either
partys primary, but not the other.
o Caucuses a simple meeting, open to all registered voters/ members of the
party, at which delegates to the partys national conventions are selected.
o Invisible Primaries candidates simply campaign for the money that is
available to them. No delegates are selected or voted on.
o Blanket Primaries everyone can vote in both primaries to choose a
presidential candidate. This type or primary is no longer used after it was ruled
unlawful by the Supreme Court in 2000.
Are Primaries good or bad?
Positives of primaries:
o They are more democratic than party leaders and the national committee
deciding the candidates that the voters may choose at an election- what
happens if the voters like neither? Are leaders more conservatively inclined?
o Influence of party leaders may be diluted, and thus, out there candidates with
no connection to the leaders and national committees could stand and possibly
become the candidates for the party.
o The competing candidates usually offer a range of policy and strategy; primaries
will therefore provide a good debate for this and able to decide which candidate
is most effective or able to me elected.
o In open primaries [see previous page], all voters have the opportunity to
participate at the very beginning of the electoral process, which can and does
increase political participation.
Negatives of Primaries:
Sam W Shenton | Rodillian Academy | Voting and Elections
1916
the
New
Hampshire
primary
has
been
very
important
when
deciding
presidential candidate but instead of voting directly for the candidates the people
would vote for delegates whod represent their votes at the National Convention. It
wasnt until 1949 that legislation was introduced which meant that people would vote
directly for the candidates instead of delegates. In 1952 43% of voters turned out to
vote for the candidates and in 1977 a law was passed which confirmed that New Hampshire
would be the first primary in the country, this shows the way in which this primary is
more democratic than the Caucuses as this sort means that the people in mass have a
direct voice in the future of the presidential race.
Is New Hampshire a good representation?
The New Hampshire Primary is widely considered to be a good representation of the
general feeling of the nation though this could be argued as the population of New
Hampshire in 96% white which means that only 4% of the population comes from an ethnic
minority which can be compared with a state such as California which has a wide range
of ethnicities for example 74% of the Californian population is white which means that
the other 26% comes from different ethnicities. This means that with the New Hampshire
primary the minorities in America dont necessarily get the best representation.
To conclude
Overall the New Hampshire Primary gives all candidates an opportunity to gain both
money and status within the presidential race and so it means that a relatively
candidate can come from being unknown before the primary to being one of the most
popular candidates after though due to the lack of diversity in New Hampshire it means
that perhaps candidates from minorities dont have as fair a chance as others though a
contradiction to this is Barack Obama.
National Conventions
Both of the major parties hold a national convention. They are:
o Usually held in the summer of a presidential election year (Aug/ Sep)
o Held in a large city. For example, in 2012, the Republicans held theirs in Tampa
(Florida), and the Democrats in Charlotte (North Carolina).
o Held at a venue decided by the partys national executive committee
o Attended be delegates (chosen in the primaries) and by the media so that they
may be televised.
Sam W Shenton | Rodillian Academy | Voting and Elections
give
much
less
coverage
to
the
conventions.
We could argue in the exam however that although the formal functions are declining
in importance, the informal functions of the Conventions are still important. The key
term many politicians use is less newsworthy.
Party Decline?
A book published by David Broder in 1972 says parties have:
o Lost control over selecting Presidential Candidates.
o Bypassed by federal matching funds.
o Candidates communicate with voters via TV and opinion polls not parties.
o Campaigns are more candidate & issue centered
Sam W Shenton | Rodillian Academy | Voting and Elections
Electoral College
How does the E/C work?
The Electoral College is outlined in the US constitution. Each state is assigned a
number of electors which is equivalent to the number of congressmen which that
state is entitled to. Every state has at least one member of the House of
Representatives, while no state has more or less than two Senators. This means that
every state must have at least three electors in the Electoral College. If youre still
struggling, the state of California has two Senators, and fifty- three (53) House of
Representative members, meaning it has fifty- five (55) electors assigned to it in the
Electoral College. The total number of Electoral College members is 538, meaning
that a candidate needs 270 to win. To put this into context, in 2008, Obama won 365
in 2008 to McCains 176, and 332 in 2012, to Romneys 207.
Most of the states use a winner takes all method of assigning the electors to a
presidential candidate. In these circumstances, the candidate who wins the most
votes in the state receives all of the electors. So, if Barack Obama won
California, he would win all fifty- five (55) members of the Electoral College. A person
wins the electors if they gain the most votes. For example, sticking with California,
Barack Obama won 61% of the vote in 2008, to McCains 37%, meaning that Obama
took all fifty- five (55) electors.
Is the E/C a good thing?
If in 2000 this was used then it would have eased the problem of Bush vs.
Gore, while in 2012, Romney would have become president if this was
used.
o Pass state laws that prohibit 'rogue' Electors from casting such 'rogue' votes
o Abolish the Electoral College altogether and decide the election on total popular
vote.
Congressional Elections
Congressional elections include elections to both the Senate and House of
Representatives. The number of Senators is fixed to two per state. The House of
Representatives currently has 435 voting- members, and 6 non- voting members. The
number of representatives that each state is entitled to is dependent upon their
population. This ranges from Alaskas one to Californias 53.
General details of these elections:
o Elections to both houses use the First Past the Post (FPTP) system, similar to
local and general elections in the UK. This means that the winner is simply the
person with the most votes in the district/ state.
o They take place on a strictly set date- the first Tuesday after the first Monday in
November, every two years, on an even-numbered year, meaning that elections
cannot be altered by the government of the day, like in many countries.
The House of Representatives:
o HoR members are elected every two years, as the constitution is designed to
ensure that these people are regularly held to account, as they are the ones
that hold much of the economic powers within the government. They may also
run in a primary before the election to select who gets to represent the district,
before Election Day. This is similar to the Presidential primaries, but on much
less a grand scale.
o Each member serves a single district.
o The number of districts, and thus members, has been dependent on population
shifts, which are measured on the census every ten years. The number of
Representatives, since 1929, has been limited to 435 voting- members. Before
then, there was to be a single district for every 30,000 people.
The Senate:
10
11
12
13
14
Senators John McCain and Russell Feingold passed reforms in 2002. These were:
o National party committees were banned from spending soft money.
o Unions and corporate groups were banned from funding advertisements.
o Money from unions and big corporations was prohibited to be used on
advertisements that mention a specific candidate within sixty (60) days of a
National election and within thirty (30) days of a state primary. For example, you
could not run an advertisement buy a car here, Obama did, within the time
limits above.
o No fundraising allowed on Federal- owned land.
o Limits on contributions raised to $2,300 per person, which increased by inflation
every odd numbered year (2009, 2013, ect.).
o Banning of contributions by foreign nationals.
o All campaign advertisements must be approved with the words My name is x
and I approve this message.
As a result of the Supreme Court 2010 ruling of Citizens United v FEC, Super PACs
appeared. These had a significant role in the 2012 election with $710,000,000 being
spent through these.
527s:
The above reforms only applied to political parties! Because of this, trade unions set
up anti- bush advertisements under section 527 of the tax code (hence the name
527s). They spent about $400,000,000 on this one purpose, with $146,000,000
coming from just 25 people. However, this may not have been that influential as they
were not allowed to affiliate with the political parties. This meant that they may just
have duplicated the work of the political parties, instead of complement it. These
527s were far less visible in the 2006 mid- term elections and the 2008 Presidential
Elections.
Fundraising in the 2008 Obama campaign:
15
16
with
America)
proposed
constitutional
amendment,
limiting
all
congressmen to 12 years a piece- two Senate terms, and 6 terms in the House of
Representatives. This failed to pass Congress, though many Republican enacted it
upon them, and thus, left their chamber by 2006.
Redistricting
An additional concern to incumbency advantage is that political parties re-draw
districts in order to protect their incumbency. This occurs, as, after each census, the
congressional districts in the House of Representatives are re-drawn to match
population shifts. This is redistricting, but if it is done in such a way that that it is to
benefit a party over another, then it is known as gerrymandering. In all but six
states (Iowa leaving redistricting in the hands of neutral civil servants, and 5 other
states using bipartisan committees), this is a real concern, as it is the state
legislatures, and thus politicians, that draw these congressional districts, and thus,
could be liable to gerrymandering. Many say that gerrymandering is on the rise. For
example, after the 2000 census, the GOP in Texas re-drew congressional districts
which gave them an additional five seats in the House of Representatives.
In
Charlie
Cooks
(leading
electoral
commentator),
there
are
as
few
as
30
truly
competitive districts left in the USA, thanks to redistricting and gerrymandering. This
is in contrast to 120 in the 1990s.
Sam W Shenton | Rodillian Academy | Voting and Elections
17
18
19
20
21
Exam Dates
Psychology:
PSYA1 Exam Monday 11th May 2015 @ 13.00
PSYA2 Exam Monday 18th May 2015 @ 13.00
PSYA3 Exam Tuesday 9th June 2015 @ 13.00
PSYA4 Exam Tuesday 16th June 2015 @ 09.30
Government and Politics:
6GP03C Exam Monday 8th June 2015 @ 09.30 (VOTING AND ELECTIONS)
6GP04C Exam Wednesday 17th June 2015 @ 09.30
History:
HIS3K Exam Monday 8th June 2015 @ 09.30
22