Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
January 2011
LTE Deployments
Fusion 700MHz MIMO DAS deployments
>200 systems shipped
~80% are MIMO
HQ of major US wireless operator
Downlink: 38 Mbps
Uplink: 12 Mbps
Large enterprise campus in Silicon Valley
Currently in DAS network expansion & optimization
Downlink: >20 Mbps
Uplink: >15 Mbps
Midsize southwestern US airport
Successful First Office Application deployment
BDA source; SISO mode
Large Las Vegas casino and convention area
Downlink: 28 Mbps
Uplink: 6 Mbps
Spatial Multiplexing
Transmits different data streams on each antenna
Increases capacity
Test Setup
Ant spacing 6
80m
RAU
WiMAX EH
CPE
WiMAX MH
Deployed at different
location for testing
Pico WiMAX
BTS
PC
PC
WiMAX RAU is deployed in a building about 80m away from MH and EH.
Pico BTS and Fusion system location is fixed during testing; only the CPE is moved throughout building.
PCs on both sides are running Jperf software to measure data throughput rate.
Phase 1 Test Setup: 1 RAU was deployed
Phase 2 Test Setup: 2 RAU were deployed
RF output power at DAS RAU antenna port : 15dBm (for SISO, and 15dBm/port for MIMO)
Antenna Spacing : 6 wavelengths @ 2.6GHz (69cm or 27inches)
Frame Structure
Phase 2
Indoor CPE;
5MHz channel BW; BTS channel allocation was lowered that BTS MIMO data rate
is limited to 5Mbps for CPE.
Approx. 200ft
Test Locations
SISO 64QAM 2/3 does not work
Approx. 200ft
10
DL Type
Modulation
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Mbps
Avg
SISO
Location
J-6ft
K-40ft
I-42ft
F-47ft
E-55ft
A-70ft
B-100ft
C-115ft
D-187ft
N-205ft
M-206ft
L-210ft
G-236ft
H-270ft
DL(Mbps)
QPSK 1/2
1.35
1.35
1.36
1.35
1.36
1.36
1.35
1.36
1.35
1.34
1.33
1.36
1.36
1.35
1.35
QPSK 3/4
2.04
2.04
2.04
2.05
2.05
2.04
2.04
2.04
2.05
2.05
1.81
2.05
2.05
2.05
2.03
16QAM 1/2
2.71
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.46
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.71
16QAM 3/4
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.09
4.09
0.00
2.15
4.11
4.10
0.00
3.37
64QAM 2/3
5.46
5.46
5.46
5.46
5.44
5.47
5.46
5.47
5.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.46
0.00
3.90
Location
J-6ft
K-40ft
I-42ft
F-47ft
E-55ft
A-70ft
B-100ft
C-115ft
D-187ft
N-205ft
M-206ft
L-210ft
G-236ft
H-270ft
DL(Mbps)
QPSK 1/2
1.35
1.36
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.36
1.36
1.36
1.35
1.35
1.35
1.34
1.36
1.35
1.35
QPSK 3/4
2.05
2.04
2.04
2.04
2.04
2.05
2.05
2.04
2.05
2.05
1.90
2.05
2.05
2.05
2.04
16QAM 1/2
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.70
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
16QAM 3/4
4.10
4.10
4.09
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.09
4.09
3.92
4.11
4.10
4.11
4.09
64QAM 2/3
5.48
5.47
5.46
5.47
5.46
5.47
5.46
5.46
5.47
0.00
0.00
5.47
5.48
0.00
4.30
Location
J-6ft
K-40ft
I-42ft
F-47ft
E-55ft
A-70ft
B-100ft
C-115ft
D-187ft
N-205ft
M-206ft
L-210ft
G-236ft
H-270ft
DL(Mbps)
QPSK 1/2
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.73
2.71
2.74
2.72
2.73
2.73
QPSK 3/4
4.11
4.10
4.10
4.10
4.11
4.11
4.10
4.11
4.10
4.04
3.93
4.10
4.11
4.11
4.09
16QAM 1/2
5.48
5.47
5.46
5.46
5.48
5.47
5.47
5.47
5.47
0.00
0.00
5.47
5.47
4.42
4.61
16QAM 3/4
8.20
8.20
8.19
8.21
8.20
8.20
8.20
8.19
8.20
0.00
0.00
8.18
8.11
0.00
6.43
64QAM 2/3
10.90
10.90
10.90
10.90
10.80
10.90
10.70
10.80
10.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.70
0.00
7.74
MIMO-A
MIMO-B
Summary:
MIMO-A: 64QAM 2/3 and 16QAM 3/4 works at more locations and has higher data rates than SISO.
11
RAU #1
6 ant. spacing
11
16
RAU #2
6 ant. spacing
7
12
13
14
17
18
68 feet
19
15
5
10
20
12
Cubicle Description
8 x 8 cubicles
53 high with glass tops (15.5)
Cubicle walls are 3.5 thick
Fabric covering over metal panels
29 high desks (1 thick)
Dividing partition is 7 long
Drop ceiling is 9-7 high
Steel Beam
6 x 6 steel posts
Angle of
photo
6 x 6
steel post
15.5
Glass tops
38.0
7 long
dividing
partition
29.0
Fabric over
metal
13
SISO
2.43
Loc #6
SISO
2.43
Loc #2
2.44
2.43
4.86
Loc #3
2.43
2.43
Loc #4
2.44
Loc #5
2.43
Loc #11
SISO
2.44
-39dBm
Loc #7
2.43
2.44
4.84
4.81
-44dBm
Loc #8
2.43
2.43
2.43
4.86
-56dBm
Loc #9
2.44
2.43
4.83
-55dBm
Loc #10
2.43
-46dBm
Loc #12
2.43
2.43
3.66
4.71
-47dBm
Loc #13
2.44
2.43
2.43
4.76
-54dBm
Loc #14
2.44
2.43
4.80
-60dBm
Loc #15
2.43
SISO
2.42
Loc #2
2.43
2.43
3.23
Loc #3
2.16
2.42
Loc #4
2.43
Loc #5
2.32
Loc #6
SISO
2.19
-68dBm
Loc #7
2.15
2.43
2.15
3.24
-73dBm
Loc #8
2.43
2.44
2.43
2.16
-69dBm
Loc #9
2.44
2.43
3.25
-75dBm
Loc #10
2.35
Loc #16
SISO
2.43
-58dBm
Loc #17
2.43
2.43
2.15
-62dBm
4.56
-65dBm
Loc #18
2.43
2.43
4.36
-66dBm
2.43
4.83
-62dBm
Loc #19
2.43
2.43
3.62
-62dBm
2.43
4.85
-62dBm
Loc #20
2.43
2.43
3.12
-68dBm
Loc #11
SISO
2.43
Loc #16
SISO
2.44
-68dBm
Loc #12
2.43
2.43
4.85
4.86
-60dBm
Loc #13
2.43
2.43
2.43
4.08
-67dBm
Loc #14
2.44
2.43
2.15
-71dBm
Loc #15
2.43
-59dBm
Loc #17
2.44
2.43
4.86
-51dBm
4.85
-64dBm
Loc #18
2.43
2.43
4.86
-48dBm
2.43
4.84
-62dBm
Loc #19
2.43
2.44
4.86
-53dBm
2.43
3.35
-69dBm
Loc #20
2.44
2.43
4.20
-56dBm
Throughput numbers in red indicate operation at a lower modulation-coding level than 64-QAM .
Varies from 16-QAM to 64-QAM
Averaged the throughput over the entire area for each antenna configuration
SISO:
2.41 Mbps
MIMO-A: 2.43 Mbps
MIMO-B: 4.17 Mbps (173% of SISO)
14
Propagation Estimate
Estimated path loss using
Log-Distance model for RAU #2
Assumed transmit power of +2dBm
out of each antenna
RSSI in previous tables is for the
pre-amble. Need to subtract 4dB for
the data section
RSSI = -38.48 24.56*log10(d)
Dist (ft)
3.28
22
44
66
88
Min
-38.70
-65.00
-73.00
-75.00
-79.00
Max
-38.70
-52.00
-63.00
-64.00
-67.00
Avg
-38.70
-57.80
-67.20
-70.20
-73.60
Model
-38.48
-58.78
-66.17
-70.50
-73.56
Err
-0.22
0.98
-1.03
0.30
-0.04
Phase 2 Propagation
-30.00
-40.00
Dist (m)
1.00
6.71
13.41
20.12
26.83
-50.00
y = -10.668Ln(x) - 38.477
-60.00
-70.00
-80.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Dist (m)
15
Minimum spacing
Literature in academia and industry recommend 3 to 7
In theory 1 should be sufficient but it depends on the environment
At 750MHz 1 = 0.40m (1.3ft)
ADC recommendation
Maximum spacing
Ideally larger spacing is better however need high SNR from both antennas
Need to consider propagation loss from each MIMO antenna as well as the RAU spacing when
looking at increasing antenna spacing
Band 1 DL
Band 2 DL
Single Antenna
Band Diplexed
Band 1 UL
Band 2 UL
Optical Fiber
CATV Cable
FDD Duplexer
MIMO 1 DL
MIMO 2 DL
2x2 MIMO
Antennas
MIMO 1 UL
MIMO 2 UL
page 17 / 1/21/2013
RF1
RF1
RF1
IF1
IF2
page 18 / 1/21/2013
Summary
TE has shipped MIMO DAS systems for the past 2 years
Both WiMAX and LTE; over 200 systems to date
Internal testing has validated that MIMO can double peak throughput relative
to SISO
Spatial multiplexing mode will double peak throughput
Spatial diversity mode improves signal quality; increases coverage area
Demonstrated 70% increase in average throughput over entire coverage area
1/21/2013
19
Questions?