Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1.0 INTRODUCTION
3.0 OBJECTIVE
4.0 THEORY
5.0 EQUIPMENT
6.0 PROCEDURES
7.0
Plati
ng
Met
hod
Pou
r
Plat
e
Aver
Tota
Dilution
age
Colo
1/
1/1
1/1
ny /
10
00
000
1/104
1/105
1/106
bact
eria
Plate
/ mL
3.33
1.00
sel.
mL
47 x
106
Spre
ad
Plat
e
123.
3.50
sel.
mL
10
60 x
103
8.0
DATA ANALYSIS
1.
Show the calculation for each of the plating method and fill in the above table.
2.
Analyze the results by using the appropriate method. Explain your findings.
There are 2 methods that we apply for this experiment which is spread plate test
method and pour plate test method. The pour plate test method is very suitable for
sample which contains plenty of water while spread plate test method is just
suitable for 0.1 - 0.5ml of water content. The medium which contains nutrients is
a food which will help the growth of bacteria.
Based on our result, we can see the dead bacteria do form any colony. Some
bacteria will occur as single cells. Other species hang together in chains or clumps
of 2 or more bacteria. A piece of dirt with 10 bacteria on it will form a single
colony. For the pour plate 4 and pour plate 5, the result shows the bacteria form
colony. This is maybe because we are not scratching well on plate before we
placed the medium. For the spread plate 6, we predict that the bacteria colony
occur affected by environment and the degree of the dilution water also affect the
result.
3.
State the systematic bias error that could occur during this experiment.
Agar not truly hot till temperature 500C or more from the specific
temperature.
Every time dilution was made on samples, the pipette not been cleaning
properly with distilled water which can make the pollution to the next
samples.
Pouring agar which been pour into every plates not consistent that can course
spreading different bacteria in each sample bacteria.
There was an error while measured the weight of the nutrient media such as
the mix peptone, beef extract and the agar.
Some bacteria will remain on the spreader which causing the count to be too
small.
Some bacteria were unable to grow under the experiment conditions causing
the count to be too small.
4.
Usually, the result shows different reading for both methods. In some cases, both
methods produce the same result. Explain why the results are indistinguishable
The results show indistinguishable and different reading for both methods. These
are because of a few factors that occurs the differences such as:
i.
ii.
iii.
It is very easy to have too many or too few colonies on a plate to accurately
measure viable count.
iv.
v.
There is also have too few cells requires concentrating, e.g., by centrifugation
or filtration.
9.0
QUESTIONS
1.
Explain the meaning of phrases two times ten to the eight cells per mL in your
own convenient terminology.
Two times ten the eighth cells per ml = 2 x 108 cells/mL
It is a very convenient terminology used by all bacteriologists and molecular
biologist. This method of expressing numbers is called scientific notation. When
you examine a liquid culture of bacteria that has grown long enough you will
notice the culture is turbid. A culture that is just barely turbid contains nearly 100
million bacteria per mL.
Some bacteria are bigger than other species. Cultures of big bacteria are visibly
turbid at fewer cells per mL (at lower titer). 100000000 bacteria per mL is a
difficult number to write or comprehend. 100,000,000 is not much better. 108
means the same thing. 108 = 100,000,000 = 100 million. Notice that the 8 is the
number of zeros. 103 = 10 x 10 x 10 = 1000 = one thousand. 1 x 108 is the
scientific notation for 100 million. 2 x 108 is the scientific notation for 200
million.
2.
What the meaning of TNTC and the significant amount due to the TNTC?
Give the formula for determining bacteria count.
has between 30 and 200 colonies where any plate which has more than 200
colonies is designated as "too numerous to count" (TNTC).
Formula :
3.
Design the experiment for comparing the bacteria counts of water sample (tap
water, lake water, swimming pool water and rain-barrel water). Explain the
different of bacteria count for each kind of water sample?
Sterile collection container (sterile bottle or test tube) with water sample
Incubator set
Procedures:
1.
Put a drop of water of well water on a sterile plate of TGY or other agar.
2.
Spread it uniformly over the surface of the agar with any non-absorbent
sterile tool. A glass rod bent into an L-shape is ideal. The bottom of a
teaspoon will also work.
3.
4.
Examine the plate as often as you like. At room temperature, it will probably
take a day or two for single cells to grow into colonies large enough for you
to see. Different species of bacteria grow at different speeds and some
species will take many days.
5.
Count the colonies. There are about 18 drops per mL, the size of drop
depends on the orifice. Small tips make small drops and it can take 30+ drops
to make one milliliter.
6.
City tap water are used in the above experiment probably got no bacteria. If used
lake water in the above experiment probably got many bacteria. If used water
from a swimming pool, you probably got many bacteria per drop and it is likely
the plate was covered and could not be counted.
4.
In many experiment there are 2 types of control used which are positive and
negative control. Due to this experiment what is the suitable control? How the
control will effect to your findings?
Positive control
Sterility checks are to be performed for each bottle of agar. Aseptically pour
about 20 mL of molten agar, cooled to 45C, into 2 Petri dishes. This should
be done at the same time as the test samples are inoculated. Incubate the
control plates with the test plates at 37C and 22C for the appropriate times.
10.0
DISCUSSION
11.0
CONCLUSIONS
12.0
REFERENCES
1.
2.
Hammer, MarkJ. (2001)Water and Waste water Technology Frouth Edition New
Terzey: Prentice Hall
3.