Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
1.1
how
to
effectively
manage
customer
maintenance
and optimization
of long term
customer relationship
realize
the
importance
of
customer
relationship
1.2
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Within the rapid expanding literature of relationship
marketing,
businesstobusiness
marketing
and
customer
1.3
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
Among the vast studies that has been done in the field of
1.4
ii.
iii.
iv.
1.5
STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS
In the view of the impact of customer relationship
Ho :
.H1:
Good
customer
attraction
programs
leads
to
customers loyalty
(2)
Ho :
H1:
(3)
1.6
SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
This studys academic contribution hinges on the fact that it
1.7
SCOPE OF STUDY
This study is focused on the impact of customer relationship
1.8
LIMITATIONS OF STUDY
The concept of customer relationship management amongst
1.9
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Customers Loyalty: Costumers loyalty is the totality of
feelings or attitudes that would incline a customer to consider
the re-purchases of a particular product, service or bond or
revisit a particular company (Kottler and Keller 2006)
10
Customer
Relationship
relationship
management
Management
is
attracting
(CRM):
Customer
maintaining
and
11
REFERENCES
Abdullateef, A .O, Morhtar, S.S. and Yuseff, R.Z. (2010): Driver of
efficient service Delivery and caller satisfaction: A Model of
CRM Customer contact Cantors in Malaysia: International of
Management Studies.
Aihie .O. and Bennani, A.E (2007). An Exploratory Study of
Implementation of Customer Relationship Management of
Strategy Business Process Management. Journal 13 (1) 2007
pp 139-164.
Berry, L.L. (1988) Relationship marketing in Shostack, G.L et al
(Eds), Emerging perspectives, Journal of Marketing Science
Vol. 23(A), pp, 236-45.
Berry, L.L. (1995) Relationship Marketing of Service. Growing
Interest, Emerging Perspectives. Journal of the Academy of
Marketing Science 23(4), 236 - 45.
Firpo, Y. (2006), Bonking the Embarked Technologys Royal in
Delivering Accessible Financial services to the poor, Samba
Consulting 5.
Fox, T. and Stead .S. (2001) customer relationship management
delivering the bone fits, white paper, CRM (UK) and SECOR
consulting, new Malden
Gummesson E. (2004) Return on Relationships (RoR), the Value of
Relationship marketing and CRM in Business to-Business
context. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing Vol 19
(2), PP, 136-148.
Levitt (1983), After Sales is over... Harvard Business Review,
101- 61, No. 2, pp-81-93.
Opara, B.C. Ayopo.O.O, Darogo. W. M. (2010), Analysis of Impact
of Technology on Relationship marketing orientation and
12
13
CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1
INTRODUCTION
This chapter is concerned with the review of literature. It is
is also aimed at
giving
14
2.2
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
As observed by Sheth and Parvatiyar (1998) developing
of
sophisticated
computer
and
telecommunication
technologies that allow producers to directly interact with endcustomers. For example, in many industries such as the airline,
banking, insurance, computer software or household appliances
industries and even consumables the de-intermediation process is
fast changing the nature of marketing and consequently making
relationship marketing more popular.
15
16
few
suppliers than
to
work
with
more
vendors,
(Hayer,
17
external
and
internal
partnering
activities,
18
including
2.3
that
like
individuals. Its
21
22
23
follow-up sales
24
who generate profit and once you have found them never let
them go (person p.11).
2.3.2
CRM PROCESS
The CRM process involved four steps. These steps are to
Evaluate
Design strategy
Implement
Figure 1
25
26
2.4
ATTRACTION,
SATISFACTION,
RELATIONSHIP
MANAGEMENT
Since CRM includes all activities directed towards the
establishment,
development
and
maintenance
of
exchange
27
CUSTOMER ATTRACTION
Attraction as a driver of customer commitment means
something that makes the service provider interested to a given
customer or the other way round so attraction can be based on
financial technology or social constructs.
Consequently,
even
social
contacts
that
are
highly
28
services quality than others in one of the ways that a firm can be
successful in achieving todays business environment. (lai et al,
2007).
Groonros (2000) described service quality in term of seven
perceived scale;
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Service recovery
6.
Serviscape
7.
Reputation credibility
29
30
Relationship
Value
Credibility
Security
Trust
Loyalty
Mutually profitable relationship for
supplier and customer
31
value
is
conceptualized
in
three
32
dimensions,
Economic
Concurrent Engineering
Investment quantity
Value reduction
Cost reduction
Goals
Social bending
Time to market
Trust
Strategic fit
Culture
Core competencies
Behavioral
Strategic
CUSTOMER RETENTION
Customer retention is increasingly being as an important
managerial issue especially in the context of saturated market or
lower growth of the number of new customers. It has been
acknowledge as a key objective of relationship marketing
primarily
because
of
its
potential
33
in
delivering
superior
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
Satisfaction and dissatisfaction are seen as two ends of a
scale which are related to each other but only have slightly
34
35
Satisfied
Delighted
Customer
Recovered
Satisfied
customer
Exhausting customer
Complaining
Dissatisfied
Source:
Not recovered
Dissatisfied
Customer
36
37
38
RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT
Relationship management is an important strategy and is one
of the important aspects of marketing in these two decades.
Morgan and Hunt (1994) defined Relationship management as all
marketing activities directed towards establishing developing and
maintaining successful relationship.
Relationships between customer and business firms have
been consistently encouraged as successful business practices
worldwide. The commotion with marketing has seldom been
established formally in the development of marketing theory (Yau,
2000). Relationship management was known as a strategic
approach to industrial and service markets and was considered to
be unsuitable in other marketing context (Omalloy and Tynan,
2000).
The idea of relationship and also relationship building being
extended to other area such as distribution, service and consumer
, are as the result of strong interest in relationship between
39
40
2.5
CUSTOMERS LOYALTY
The degree of customers loyalty is measured as the
Attitude
Positive
Negative
Buying pattern
Negative
Positive
True loyalty
Spurious loyalty
Latent loyalty
No loyalty
3.
4.
44
2.6
CUSTOMER
RELATIONSHIP
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
IN
BANKING/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Panda (2003) observed that globalization and deregulation,
combined with radically enhanced the managerial context of
45
of
new
customer
administration,
marketing
as
being
the
most
advanced
in
customer
relations
46
47
(2003),
states
that
for
successful
CRM
2.6.1
48
49
introduced a
2.7
INTEGRATIVE SUMMARY
The review highlights customer relationship management
54
REFERENCES
Adeoti-Adekeye, W.B. (1997), Important of Management
Information System: Journal of the Library review 46 (5),
318 327
Anandarajan; M. et al (2002) Technology acceptance in the
banking industry: A perspective from a less developed
country: Journal of Information technology and people Vol
13 (4), pg 298 312
Arezu .G. and Alieza .O. (2006), Impact of Customer Relationship
Management of Customer Retention: Master thesis: Julea
University of technology, 2006:02 PB: ISSN: 1653 0187
Beck, T. et al (2005), Bank privatization and performance:
Empirical evidence from Nigerias Journal of Banking and
Finance. 29 (8 9), 2355 2379.
Caruana, A, (2002) Service loyalty the effect of service loyalty
and mediating role of customer satisfaction European
journal of Marketing, 36, 7/8, pp 1 2.
Dwyer F.R. Schurr. P.H, and Oh, S. (1987) Developing Buyer
Seller Relationship. Journal of Marketing vol 51, 11 27.
Eroke, L. (2008) Between Banks Product and Quantity Service
This Day Newspaper Vol 13 (4694), 33 -34.
Foss, B. and Stone, M. (2002) CRM in financial services: A
practical Guide to making customer relationship
management: Work Kogan Page Publisher.
Gilbert, D.F, and Buttle, E.D, (1996), Airlines in Relationship
Marketing: Theory and Practice: pp, 131 144, London:
Paul Chapman.
55
56
57
58
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1
INTRODUCTION
Polkinghorne (1985) defines methodology as Examination of
59
3.1
RESEARCH DESIGN
This is the programme that is meant to guide the researcher
in
the
process
of
collecting,
analyzing
and
interpreting
observations.
According to Olannye (2006) research design are the
approaches, framework or plans for carrying out research studies.
The design method adopted for this research takes the form
of a survey study as it allows samples to be selected and
explanatorily studied. The design permit the collection of original
data meant for describing large population with individual as unit
of analysis.
The research is also designed to ascertain the Impact of
Customer relationship management on Customers loyalty.
60
3.3
N
n
61
Where:
3.4
Sample size
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
A stratified sampling technique was adopted for this study as
3.5
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
This is a major procedure to be followed in carrying out a
62
Agree (A)
Undecided (U)
Disagree (D)
64
3.6
3.7
65
3.8
66
MODEL
L= 0+1x1+2x2+33+4x4+E1
Where 1, 2 and 3 . n. are the slope coefficient for
predictors x1, x2,x3xn
67
REFERENCES
Alasautari, P. (1998) An introduction to Social Research Sage
Publications: London
Bryman, A. (1988) Quantity and Quality in Social Research Union
Hyman Ltd London
Czaja, R. and Blair, J. (2005) Designing Surveys, Pine Forge Press:
London
Olannye, P.A (2006) Research Methods for Business: A skill Building
Approach, Peejan Publication. Lagos.
Oppenhein, A.N (1992). Questionnaire Design, interviewing and
Attitude Measurement London: Printer.
Polkinghorne, D. (1983) Methodology for the Human Science. State
University of New York Press Albany.
Graziano, A.M and Raulin, M.L. (2004) Research Methods: A
process of Inquiry Pearson United States of America.
68
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1
INTRODUCTION
This chapter focuses on the presentation and analysis of data
69
4.2
4.1.1 Gender
SEX
FREQUENCY
PERCENTAGE
Male
19
38.8%
Female
30
61.2%
Total
49
100
The above table shows that males are 19 with 38.8% and
female 30 (61.2%). This shows that females are more amongst
the respondents than male.
4.2.2 Age
FREQUENCY
PERCENTAGE
Below 30
31
63.3
31 40
13
26.5
Total
49
100
70
4.2.3 Education
FREQUENCY
PERCENTAGE
OND/NCE
15
30.6
HND/B.Sc
28
57.1
Masters
12.2
Total
49
100
PERCENTAGE
Below 5yrs
38
77.6
5 - 10
12.2
Above 10
10.2
Total
49
100
71
PERCENTAGE
Junior Staff
25
51.0
Senior Staff
17
34.7
Management Staff
14.3
Total
49
100
FREQUENCY
0
72
PERCENTAGE
0
Disagree
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
0
0
26
21
49
0
4.1
53.1
42.9
100
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
PERCENTAGE
0
4.1
6.1
67.3
22.4
100
3(6.1%)
were
Undecided,
33(67.3%)
agree
while
FREQUENCY
1
1
73
PERCENTAGE
2.0
2.0
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
6
11
30
49
12.2
22.4
61.2
100
FREQUENCY
1
1
3
23
21
49
PERCENTAGE
2.0
2.0
6.1
46.9
42.9
100
74
FREQUENCY
0
0
8
15
26
49
PERCENTAGE
0
0
16.3
30.6
53.1
100
FREQUENCY
1
7
0
20
21
49
PERCENTAGE
2.0
14.3
0
40.8
42.9
100
Q7: I got to know about company and its products and services
through media advertisement
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
FREQUENCY
2
1
5
19
22
49
PERCENTAGE
4.1
2.0
10.2
38.8
44.9
100
FREQUENCY
0
1
4
25
19
76
PERCENTAGE
0
2.0
8.2
51.0
88.0
Total
49
100
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
PERCENTAGE
0
2.0
6.1
44.9
46.9
100
From the above table 0(0%) are strongly disagree from the
respondent, 1(2%) Disagree, 3(6.1%) are undecided, 22(44.9%)
Agree, 23(46.9%) strongly agree.
Research
Question
4:
To
what
77
PERCENTAGE
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
1
1
2
28
17
49
2
2
4.1
57.1
34.7
100
FREQUENCY
2
3
4
24
16
49
PERCENTAGE
4.1
6.1
8.2
49.0
32.7
100
78
FREQUENCY
1
1
7
24
16
49
PERCENTAGE
2
2
14.3
49.0
32.7
100
CUSTOMER LOYALTY
Q13: Trust consistency in service delivery encourages patronage
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
FREQUENCY
2
2
5
26
14
49
79
PERCENTAGE
4.1
4.1
10.2
53.1
28.6
100
FREQUENCY
0
1
2
32
14
49
PERCENTAGE
0
2.0
4.1
65.3
28.6
100
FREQUENCY
1
2
14
16
16
49
80
PERCENTAGE
2
4.1
28.6
32.7
32.7
100
COMMITMENT
Q16: Company maintain high level of integrity this make me
committed to them.
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
FREQUENCY
1
2
1
23
22
49
PERCENTAGE
2
4.1
2
46.9
44.9
100
FREQUENCY
0
1
3
18
81
PERCENTAGE
0
2
6.1
36.7
Strongly Agree
Total
27
49
55.1
100
FREQUENCY
0
2
13
20
14
49
PERCENTAGE
0
4.1
26.5
40.8
28.6
100
13(26.5%)
undecided,
Strongly Agree.
82
20(40.8%)
Agree,
14(28.6%)
SATISFACTION
Q19: Company encourage face to face dealing
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
FREQUENCY
0
2
12
22
13
49
PERCENTAGE
0
4.1
24.5
44.9
26.5
100
12(24.5%) Undecided,
22(44.9%) Agree,
13(26.5%)
Strongly Agree.
Q20: Company responds to message and keep client informed
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
FREQUENCY
0
0
14
14
21
49
PERCENTAGE
0
0
28.6
28.6
42.9
100
14(28.6%)
undecided,
Strongly Agree.
83
14(28.6%)
Agree,
21(42.9%)
FREQUENCY
1
1
1
18
28
49
PERCENTAGE
2.0
2.0
2.0
36.7
57.1
100
84
Sum of Trust,
Commitment and
Satisfaction
Sum of CR, Cs, CA and
RM
Valid N (listwise)
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std.
Deviation
49
21.00
44.00
32.2857
4.66815
49
33.0
60.00
50.8163
5.11401
49
Model Summary
a.
Mode
Adjusted
Std. Error of the
I
R
R square
R Square
Estimate
a
1
.659
.435
.383
3.66550
Predictors:
(Constant),
Relationship
management,
Customers
satisfaction, Customers attraction, Customers retention
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Coefficients
85
Standardized
Coefficients
Model
Std. Error
Betta
Sig.
(Constant)
Customer Relation
9.518
.411
5.481
.474
.136
1.736
.868
.089
.390
Customers Satisfaction
.747
.386
.305
1.935
.059
Customers attraction
.077
.329
.030
.234
.816
Relationship management
.967
.292
.419
3.308
.002
86
Q7: I got to know about company and its products and services
through media advertisement
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
FREQUENCY
2
1
5
19
22
49
PERCENTAGE
4.1
2.0
10.2
38.8
44.9
100
FREQUENCY
0
1
4
25
19
49
PERCENTAGE
0
2.0
8.2
51.0
88.0
100
FREQUENCY
0
1
3
22
23
49
PERCENTAGE
0
2.0
6.1
44.9
46.9
100
From the above table 0(0%) are strongly disagree from the
respondent, 1(2%) Disagree, 3(6.1%) are undecided, 22(44.9%)
Agree, 23(46.9%) strongly agree.
MODEL
L= 0+1x1+2x2+33+4x4+E1`
88
DECISION
Since customer attraction has a figure of .816 which is
insignificant, we will accept Null hypothesis (H0) and reject
Alternate hypothesis (H1).
TESTING HYPOTHESIS 2
This hypothesis was tested with research question 4 which states
to what extent does Relationship management leads to
89
FREQUENCY
1
1
2
28
17
49
PERCENTAGE
2
2
4.1
57.1
34.7
100
FREQUENCY
2
3
4
24
16
49
90
PERCENTAGE
4.1
6.1
8.2
49.0
32.7
100
FREQUENCY
1
1
7
24
16
49
PERCENTAGE
2
2
14.3
49.0
32.7
100
MODEL
L= 0+1x1+2x2+33+4x4+E1`
TESTING HYPOTHESIS 3
The hypothesis was tested with research question 1 which states
To what degree do customer
customers loyalty?
92
retention
programs
affect
FREQUENCY
0
0
0
26
21
49
PERCENTAGE
0
0
4.1
53.1
42.9
100
FREQUENCY
0
2
3
33
11
49
93
PERCENTAGE
0
4.1
6.1
67.3
22.4
100
3(6.1%)
were
Undecided,
33(67.3%)
agree
while
FREQUENCY
1
1
6
11
30
49
PERCENTAGE
2.0
2.0
12.2
22.4
61.2
100
MODEL
L= 0+1x1+2x2+33+4x4+E1`
The hypothesis is stated thus
94
From the regression table 4.3 it shows that customer retention has
a positive Beta coefficient of .411 and with .390 level of
significance. .390 is greater than .005 and this makes it
insignificant.
DECISION
Since customer retention has a figure of .390 which is
insignificant. We will accept null hypothesis (H0) and reject
alternate hypothesis (H1).
TESTING HYPOTHESIS 4
95
FREQUENCY
1
1
3
23
21
49
PERCENTAGE
2.0
2.0
6.1
46.9
42.9
100
FREQUENCY
0
0
96
PERCENTAGE
0
0
Undecided
Agree
Strongly Agree
Total
8
15
26
49
16.3
30.6
53.1
100
FREQUENCY
1
7
0
20
21
49
PERCENTAGE
2.0
14.3
0
40.8
42.9
100
MODEL
L= 0+1x1+2x2+33+4x4+E1`
97
DECISION
Since customers satisfaction programs has a figure of .059
which is significant. We accept alternate hypothesis (H1) and
reject null hypothesis (H0)
98
CHAPTER FIVE
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1
DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
This research provides both theory development implication
development
involves
the
confirmation
of
some
management
Customer
attraction,
Customer
In
this
research
primary
data
was
elicited
through
retention,
customer
satisfaction,
Relationship
100
5.2
CONCLUSION
The main aim of this research was to understand the Impact
101
102
5.3
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the result of this study, it is the opinion of the
2.
103
5.4
FUTURE RESEARCH
104
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abdullateef, A .O, Morhtar, S.S. and Yuseff, R.Z. (2010): Driver of
efficient service Delivery and caller satisfaction: A Model of
CRM Customer contact Cantors in Malaysia: International of
Management Studies.
Adeoti-Adekeye, W.B. (1997), Important of Management
Information System: Journal of the Library review 46 (5),
318 327
Aihie .O. and Bennani, A.E (2007). An Exploratory Study of
Implementation of Customer Relationship Management of
Strategy Business Process Management. Journal 13 (1) 2007
pp 139-164.
Alasautari, P. (1998) an introduction to Social Research Sage
Publications: London.
Anandarajan; M (2002) Technology acceptance in the banking
industry: A perspective from a less developed country:
Journal of Information technology and people Vol 13 (4), pg
298 312
Arezu .G. and Alieza .O. (2006), Impact of Customer Relationship
Management of Customer Retention: Master thesis: Julea
University of technology, 2006:02 PB: ISSN: 1653 0187
Beck, T. (2005), Bank privatization and performance: Empirical
evidence from Nigerias Journal of Banking and Finance. 29
(8 9), 2355 2379.
Berry, L.L. (1988) Relationship marketing in Shostack, G.L et al
(Eds), Emerging perspectives, Journal of Marketing Science
Vol. 23(A), pp, 236-45.
105
107
109
110