Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 18

Q ui

by N
ht

pyrig
No Co
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
Approach sse nc e
n

for Anterior Reconstructions Using


Current Ceramics, Implants, and
Adhesive Systems
Jan Hajt, Dr Med Dent
Specialist in esthetic dentistry (DGZ), Munich, Germany

Uwe Gehringer, CDT


Private practice, Munich, Germany

Mutlu zcan, Prof Dr Med Dent, PhD


University of Zurich Dental Materials Unit, Switzerland

Correspondence to: Jan Hajt


(FNFJOTDIBGUTQSBYJT)BKU$BDBDJ 8FJOTUS .VOJDI (FSNBOZUFM FNBJMESKBOIBKUP!UPOMJOFEF

242
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

fo r

A Multi-faceted Treatment

ot

CASE REPORT

HAJT ET ALopyrig

Abstract

fo r

Of all developments in dental technol

mandible with a combined treatment ap

ogy, fullling the esthetic and functional

proach utilizing veneers for harmonized

demands of the patient, especially re

space distribution on the abutment teeth

garding anterior reconstructions, is still

BOEBOJNQMBOUTVQQPSUFE[JSDPOJBmYFE

a challenge for both dentists and dental

dental prosthesis in the anterior seg

technicians. This becomes more dif

ment of the maxilla. Adhesive cementa

cult for patients with a previous treat

tion of the restorations is also presented

ment history that is not ideal. This case

JO B TUFQCZTUFQ BQQSPBDI CBTFE PO

presentation demonstrates reconstruc

the current state of the art.

ot

Q ui

by N
ht

No C
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

UJPOPGBOBOUFSJPS[JSDPOJBSFTJOCPOEFE
mYFEEFOUBMQSPTUIFTJT 3#'%1
GPSUIF

(Eur J Esthet Dent 2010;5:242259)

243
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

CASE REPORT

Q ui

by N
ht

pyrig
No Co
t fo
rP
ub
lica
ti
te con on
marginal t, minimal abrasion, and
ss e n c e

ot

Introduction

fo r

servative tooth preparation. Yet they are


Today, prosthetic and operative treat

not as effective as reinforced ceramics

ment concepts could be categorized as

in preventing premature failure. On the

OPOJOWBTJWF SFWFSTJCMF
NJOJNBMMZJOWB

PUIFSIBOE BSFJOGPSDFEBMMDFSBNJD'%1

sive (partially reversible), and (more) in

can be achieved using milled aluminous

WBTJWFTUSBUFHJFT OPOSFWFSTJCMF
VTJOH

or zirconia copings. However, the pres

various

materials.

Dentistry, perhaps,

ence of the relatively opaque internal

has the unique distinction of using the

ceramic core may provide an impedi

widest variety of materials, ranging from

ment to matching some tooth colors.

NFUBMT BOE NFUBM BMMPZT UP SFTJOCBTFE

Although minimally invasive applica

composites and ceramics. Develop

tions are possible using direct compos

ments, especially in the eld of polymers

JUFT TFOTJUJWJUZPGUFDIOJRVFJTBOJTTVF

and ceramics, have largely eliminated

the drawbacks of composites involve the

the use of metals in the mouth. In spite of

loss of surface lustre. This may require

all the advances, clinicians should real

repolishing,

ize the drawbacks before selecting the

This is commonly found to be the case

most appropriate material for a particu

after several years of clinical function,

lar situation. Concentrating only on the

and therefore the maintenance of the

NBUFSJBMTQSPQFSUJFTJTOPUTVGmDJFOUDMJ

surface characteristics of composites,

nicians should be mindful of the best ap

even after nishing and polishing, is an

plication method. As the esthetic aspect

ongoing issue.

renishing, or relayering.

of dental care becomes increasingly im

Minimally invasive applications are

portant to patients, the dental practitioner

also possible using ceramic veneers.

should be aware of the applications and

According to the majority of studies, it

MJNJUBUJPOT PG UIF WBSJPVT UPPUIDPMPSFE

is clear that from the mechanical point

restorative materials or systems and bal

of view, retention of laminates is not

ance these with the ethical aspects of

seen to be problematic.4 Clinical stud

the invasive applications.

ies rarely report debonding, indicating

Fortunately, the dental profession has

that the adhesion of the luting cement,

proted from remarkable technological

not only to dental tissues but also to the

advances in the substitution of missing

IZESPnVPSJDFUDIFEBOETJMBOJ[FEDFSBN

dental tissues and teeth. However, we

ic, is very reliable. Therefore the choice

are still faced with the challenge of rep

PGGVMMDPWFSBHF'%1TPWFSMBNJOBUFTGPS

licating the tooth tissues, mechanically,

mechanical retention reasons cannot be

physically, biologically, and optically.

justied. 4JNJMBSMZ  SFTJOCPOEFE '%1T

With the increased options, the choice of

3#'%1T
 XIJDI BSF BMMDFSBNJD  BSF

material is also becoming more difcult.

preferable to metal ceramics due to be

When a qualied ceramist is engaged,

ing minimally invasive, and also for es

pressed ceramics provide outstanding

thetic reasons. Nevertheless, teeth sur

results for a single anterior xed dental

rounded by healthy periodontal tissues

prosthesis (FDP), more so than almost

generally have a very high longevity, up

all other restorative options, with suitable

UPPWFSZFBST5 Therefore, the

244
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

HAJT ET ALopyrig

utmost care should be taken to preserve

fo r

the cementoenamel junction. This may

ot

Q ui

by N
ht

No C
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

not always be achieved, however, due to


required tissue sacrice for esthetic rea
TPOT*OBEEJUJPO QBUJFOUSFMBUFEGBDUPST
will continue to dominate when choosing
one restoration type over another, or the
most suitable restorative materials for
the patient.
The situation becomes even more
complex when the patient has a history
of several treatment concepts that have
failed. This case presentation could be

Fig 1  #BTFMJOFTJUVBUJPOXJUIBOJNQMBOUBU SF


TUPSFEXJUIBUFNQPSBSJMZDFNFOUFEMPOHUJNFUFN
QPSBSZ SFTJOCBTFE mYFE EFOUBM QSPTUIFTJT '%1


considered an example of the most mini

DSPXO
.FUBMCBTFESFTJOCPOEFE'%1POBOE

mally invasive and durable approach

XJUICFJOHUIFQPOUJD

being practiced, according to the cur


rent state of the art and considering the
patients demands.

Materials and methods

#BTFMJOFTJUVBUJPO
in the maxilla

"ZFBSPMEGFNBMFQBUJFOUQSFTFOUFE

In the maxilla, both bone loss and soft tis

with an implant placed alio loco at tooth

sue loss were observed. The implant was

CZIFSQSFWJPVTEFOUJTUBOEBUFNQP

positioned correctly. However, despite

rarily rehabilitated situation in the max

the previously accomplished soft tissue

JMMBBOENBOEJCMF 'JH
4IFBTLFEGPS

augmentation, the implant shoulder was

a permanent rehabilitation in both the

MPDBUFE MBCJBMMZ  BQQSPYJNBUFMZ  NN

maxilla and the mandible as quickly as

CFMPXUIFHJOHJWB 'JH
'PSUIJTSFBTPO 

possible. Since she had already been

an individualized zirconium oxide (ZrO)

through extensive therapy, her explicit

DFSBNJDBCVUNFOUXJUImSFEPODFSBNJD

wish was to limit therapy as much as

and a short external hex connector of

possible, but at the same time accom

TNBMM EJBNFUFS #SOFNBSL 4ZTUFN

plish the best possible result.

Among

NP) was made. The problem with this

others, the previous treatments involved

BQQSPBDIJTVODFSUBJOMPOHUFSNSFTJTU

implantation and explantation in the re

ance against loading of the connection.

HJPOPGUPPUIBTXFMMBTSFQFBUFETPGU

During cyclic loading, vibrations and

tissue augmentation in the region of teeth

PTDJMMBUJOHNJDSPNPWFNFOUTPSXFBSPG

BOE5IFQBUJFOUEFTDSJCFEIFSTFMG

the two participating materials occurs

as very sensible, nervous, critical, and

with the consequence of material loss at

unsure about the treatment outcome.

the surface. For the wear process, not


only the roughness but also the hard
ness of the material plays a role. ZrO

245
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

CASE REPORT

Q ui

by N
ht

pyrig
No Co
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

ot

fo r

Fig 2  #BTFMJOFTJUVBUJPOXIFSFUIFJNQMBOUTIPVM

Fig 3

der is hardly covered with gingiva.

abutment with traces of worn titanium and food de

The already existing individualized ZrO

bris at the inner side.

IBTB,OPPQIBSEOFTTWBMVFPGLH

UIFUFNQPSBSZDSPXO 'JH
.PSFPWFS 

mm,

being relatively harder than that of

UIFMPOHUFSN UFNQPSBSZ'%1FYIJCJUFE

UJUBOJVN LHNN).6 For external hex

BOBEFRVBUFGPSN BOEUIFFHHTIBQFE

DPOOFDUPST UPEFHSFFTPGSPUBUJPOBM

pontic showed a correct contact surface

loose t between the implant body and

to the gingiva.

various tested abutments were deter


mined.7,8

The therapy concept

8JUI OPODPOJDBM TFMGCMPDLJOH DPO


OFDUJPOT  B NJDSPNPWFNFOU BU UIF JO
terface can never be

avoided.

#BTFE PO UIF BCPWFNFOUJPOFE TJUVB

Also in

tion, it was decided to construct a new

this case, wear of the titanium surface on

BMMDFSBNJD;S0 abutment bonded onto

the ZrOXBTOPUJDFE 'JH


5IFGPPE

a titanium base, and to thin the titanium

debris and biolm on the inner surface

base on the labial side to the minimum

of the abutment were indicators of the

thickness possible. In such difcult cas

presence of an insufcient connection.

es, the crown margin should be posi

The high rotational forces of the can

tioned labially and cervically, as much

tilever pontic are another unfavorable

as possible, in order to avoid any expo

factor in such a material combination.

sure of the zirconium abutment. If fur

Changing

by

ther recession occurs, the nishing line

grinding must be considered a major

between crown and abutment would be

complication since, in the case of a re

visible.

the

implant

geometry

pair, the new restoration would require

Accomplishing a perfect harmony

a direct impression followed by manu

from an esthetic standpoint is more dif

facturing and inserting an individually

cult when fewer teeth are subject to treat

cast abutment. In the described case,

ment in a given segment of the dental

UIFmSFEPODFSBNJDXBTDMFBSMZWJTJCMF

arch. In the presented case, the baseline

beyond (cervically) the nishing line of

situation exhibited asymmetric positions

246
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

HAJT ET ALopyrig

fo r

Fig 4

The digital modeling of the new ZrO abut

Fig 5

ot

Q ui

by N
ht

No C
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

The new nished individual ZrO abutment

ment. Note that due to the low implant depth, the

MVUFE PO UIF UJUBOJVN CBTF .FEFOUJLB  #BEFO

shoulder of the titanium adhesive base had to be

#BEFO (FSNBOZ
.JOJNBMQSFQBSBUJPOPGUPPUI

designed short. With this approach the metal mar


gins were achieved almost invisibly.

of the lateral incisors due to soft tissue


loss and the rotation of the lateral inci
sors. In order to fulll the high esthetic
demands of the patient, it was decided
to involve these two teeth in the recon
TUSVDUJPO 0O UPPUI   B DMBTTJD MBCJBM
WFOFFSXBTNBEF'PSUPPUI BDSPXO
as an abutment tooth was planned (Figs
48). This relatively invasive treatment
option was chosen for two reasons: (1)

Fig 6  5IF WJFX PG $"%$". ;S0 framework.

UIFMPOHUFSNTUBCJMJ[BUJPOPGUIFFYUFO

With ZrO xed dental prostheses, it is important


UP IBWF OPU POMZ  NN DPOOFDUPS DSPTTTFDUJPOT

sion bridge seemed questionable, and


(2) a harmonious optimal closure of the
JOUFSEFOUBMHBQTCFUXFFOBOEXBT

CVUBMTPBDPOOFDUPSIFJHIUPGNJOJNVNNNBOE
a rounded cervical transition shape from abutment
to the pontic.

possible. In such a case, with several


extracted neighboring teeth, the papilla
MPTT CFUXFFO  BOE  BT XFMM BT 
BOEQSFTFOUFEBNBKPSFTUIFUJDQSPC
MFN#FDBVTFXBTBTPVOEUPPUI UIF
DSPXO SFEVDUJPO XBT LFQU UP  NN GPS
preservation of the pulp. In the anterior
area, it is considered an appropriate
clinical practice to reduce the zirconium
PYJEFGSBNFXPSLUPNN  In so do
ing, it is possible to achieve a good es

Fig 7

The labial position of the connector requires

precise planning. In this case, the waxup yielded a

thetic outcome even with minimal space

palatal position of the connectors to obtain a maxi

BWBJMBCMF 8JUI '%1T  UIF CJTRVF USZJO

mum thickness strength also at the proximal areas.

247
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

CASE REPORT

Q ui

by N
ht

pyrig
No Co
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

fo r

Fig 8

ot

b
The labial surface of the ZrODPQJOHPGXBTSFEVDFEUPNNJOPSEFSUPBDIJFWFSPPNGPSUIF

maximum thickness of the veneering ceramic.

Fig 9  %VSJOHCJTRVFUSZJOPGUIFVOJUmYFEEFO

Fig 10

UBM QSPTUIFTJT  JU XBT OPUJDFE UIBU MFBWJOH UPPUI 

MVUFEPOBUJUBOJVNCBTF .FEFOUJLB #BEFO#BEFO 

unchanged, which is too narrow and tilted distally,

(FSNBOZ
1SFQBSBUJPOPG BTNJOJNBMMZBTQPT

is an esthetic compromise. With the consent of the

TJCMF BOEWFOFFSPOUPPUI

The nished individualized ZrO abutment

patient, a labial veneer was placed to improve the


esthetics.

is one of the most important steps of the


treatment and should be practiced sev
eral times if necessary. During bisque
USZJO  UIF GPMMPXJOH BTQFDUT TIPVME CF
taken into consideration:
n t of the abutments
n proximal contacts
n basal shape and contact of the pon
tics with the gingiva
Fig 11

Temporarily cemented xed dental pros

thesis (bridge) for several days with the veneer on


UPPUI  7JFX PG UIF UFNQPSBSZ SFTUPSBUJPO JO UIF
mandible.

n occlusion
n perception of the reconstruction with
the tongue
n phonetics
n esthetics.

248
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

HAJT ET ALopyrig

important. Corrections can be made by

TIPXO UIF TVQFSJPS MPOHFWJUZ PG POF

removing ceramic or by adding material,

XJOHFE3#'%1T*OUIFNBYJMMB POFVOJU

and the correct relationship should be

FYUFOTJPO3#'%1TBSFDMFBSMZQSFGFSSFE

communicated to the dental technician.

However, it is the present authors expe

*OUIJTDBTF UIFUSZJOTIPXFEUIBUUIFWF

SJFODFUIBUJOUIFNBOEJCMF UIFUXPXJOH

OFFSPQUJPOGPSTJHOJmDBOUMZJNQSPWFE

design functions very well. For this rea

UIF HFOFSBM FTUIFUJDT 'JHT  BOE 




TPO B UXPXJOH EFTJHO XBT DIPTFO *O

The veneers had to be made twice since

the mandible, the gap was signicantly

the form did not suit the clinical require

larger than the usual width of the man

ment at the rst attempt and the color

EJCVMBSJODJTPST 'JH
*OTVDIDBTFT 

was too light. (With veneers, the color

the best esthetics are achieved when

of the ceramic should be correct right

the width is distributed equally to each

BXBZ B MBUFS DPSSFDUJPO XJUI UIF MVUJOH

tooth. As to how this can be realized, the

fo r

The control of the position of the pon

composite gives only very limited scope

theoretical possibilities are as follows:

for change. For this reason, it is pre

n enlarge the abutment teeth with

ferred to remake a veneer if the color is in


EPVCU
#FDBVTFUIFQBUJFOUEJEOPUGFFM

composite
n enlarge the abutment teeth with

sure about the nal treatment outcome,

ceramic as an integrated part of the

despite great care and individual adjust

bridge

ments, the nished work was cemented

ot

Q ui

by N
ht

tics in relation to the gingiva is especially

No C
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
BPOFXJOHEFTJHOIBTCFFOBOTXFSFE
ss e n c e
by Kern. Clinical data have clearly

n make separate additional veneers.

UFNQPSBSJMZ 'JH 
 4VDI B QSPDFEVSF
is rarely performed due to possible dam

The therapy concept

age occurring during the temporarization


period or during removal of the restora

In order to close the proximal gap as

tion. It is, however, sometimes necessary

much as possible towards the cervical,

if the patient specically requests it.

the authors preference was the last op


UJPO 'JHT o
 5IF TFDPOE PQUJPO
would have required ring on veneer

#BTFMJOFTJUVBUJPO
in the mandible

ing ceramic without an adequate sup


porting substructure, which seemed
questionable from a technical point of

The missing tooth could be replaced

view. Furthermore, the required inser

XJUI BO BMMDFSBNJD 3#'%1 XJUI MJOHVBM

tion path would have created problems

XJOHT VTJOH B UJTTVFTBWJOH BQQSPBDI

cervically. The possible aging of the

The question was which design would be

composite was the reason for rejecting

best. Extension of the wings over more

the rst option. The contact points of the

than one abutment tooth has yielded

WFOFFST UP UIF 3#'%1 XFSF QSFDJTFMZ

clinically unfavorable outcomes, the dis

determined using a laboratory paralel

tally connected tooth showing delamina

lometer. Additional veneers are virtually

tion over time. The question of whether

invisible on teeth as long as the nishing

BUXPXJOHEFTJHOXPVMECFCFUUFSUIBO

MJOFJTPSJFOUFEDFSWJDPJODJTBMMZ 'JH


249
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

CASE REPORT

Q ui

by N
ht

pyrig
No Co
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

fo r

The wax setup on the prepared tooth

serves as a quick impression of the width discrep

Fig 13

ot

Fig 12

Waxup of the required enlargement of the

neighboring teeth.

ancy and the gap between the abutment teeth (set


up system: Anteriores Set, Wichnalek, Augsburg,
Germany).

Fig 14

For a better visualization of the width distri

Fig

15

Additional ceramic veneers (Creation

bution, gold powder was used on the waxup.

Classic) on the plaster model.

However, nishing lines perpendicular

QBSUJDMFTBUCBSGPSTUPHFUIFSXJUI

to the tooths long axis may be visible in

B QIPTQIBUF NPOPNFS .%1


DPOUBJO

some cases. After adhesive cementa

ing primer and the corresponding ce

tion of the veneers, a new impression

ment.  Of all possible alternatives,

was made. The construction of the ZrO

HSJUCMBTUJOHIBTUIFCFTUTVSGBDFDMFBO

framework was achieved using an es

ing effect.#FDBVTF[JSDPOJVNPYJEF

UBCMJTIFE$"%$".TZTUFN 'JH


is not etchable, a clean and rough sur

The surface treatment of the ZrO for

face is obtained that ensures wetting of

adhesive cementation can be achieved

the surface, which is a prerequisite for

VTJOH BJS BCSBTJPO XJUI  N BMVNJOB

BEIFTJPO"OPUIFSQPTTJCJMJUZJTUPTJMJDB

250
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

HAJT ET ALopyrig

fo r

Fig 16

The already accomplished lingual prep

Fig 17

ot

Q ui

by N
ht

No C
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

Proximal veneers.

aration is completed with additional veneers. The


sharp nishing line is placed backwards behind
the middle in order to enable a smooth adaptation
between the etched feldspathic ceramic and the
ZrO framework. Central positioning grooves in the
preparation make cementation easier.

Fig 18  "EIFTJWFMZDFNFOUFEWFOFFSTPOBOE

Fig 19  %JHJUBM EFTJHO PG UIF SFTJOCPOEFE mYFE

 "T B SVMF  WFSUJDBM USBOTJUJPOT BSF JODPSQPSBUFE

dental prosthesis.

quite invisibly.

coat the cementation surfaces with Co

In the case presented, the whole lin

+FUPS3PDBUFD .&41& 4FFGFME 

gual surfaces of the teeth and the proxi

Germany) silanization and then use

mal cementation surfaces of the veneers

B #JT(."CBTFE DFNFOU 'JHT 

XFSFDMFBOFEVTJOHNJDSPBCSBTJPOXJUI

UP 
 $VSSFOUMZ  UIFSF JT OP MPOHUFSN

NBMVNJOBTMVSSZVOEFSXBUFS 1SFQ

clinical study available on the effect of

, .BY  &.4  /ZPO  4XJU[FSMBOE


 BOE

TVSGBDF DPOEJUJPOJOH PG OPOFUDIBCMF

UIF TVSGBDFT XFSF SPVHIFOFE 'JH 




ceramics on clinical behavior. Aging

'JOBMMZ UIFUFFUIXFSFFUDIFEXJUI

was reported to have a detrimental ef

QIPTQIPSJDBDJE 6MUSB&UDI, Ultradent

GFDUPOMPOHUFSNBEIFTJPO 

Products, South Jordan, UT, USA) and

251
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

CASE REPORT

Q ui

by N
ht

pyrig
No Co
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

fo r

dental prosthesis on the model.

ot

Fig 20  'JOJTIFE BMMDFSBNJD SFTJOCPOEFE mYFE

Fig 21  3FTJOCPOEFEmYFEEFOUBMQSPTUIFTJTXJUI


two wings (two bonded retainers). ZrO framework
XBT WFOFFSFE XJUI $SFBUJPO ;*' DFSBNJD CVU UIF
retainers were not veneered.

Fig 22

Silica coating of the cementation surfac

Fig 23

Application of the silane coupling agent

FT PG UIF XJOHT XJUI UIF $P+FU TZTUFN . &41& 

(Monobond S, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechten

Seefeld, Germany).

TUFJO
*UUBLFTNJOVUFUPFWBQPSBUFUIFTPMWFOU

Fig 24  "QQMJDBUJPO PG UIF EVBMDVSFE MVUJOH DPN

Fig 25  $MFBOJOHUIFTVSGBDFXJUIBJSnPX 1SFQ,

posite (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liech

Max, EMS).

UFOTUFJO
 PO UIF DFNFOUBUJPO TVSGBDFT PG UIF SFTJO
bonded xed dental prosthesis.

252
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

HAJT ET ALopyrig

fo r

Fig 26

Cementation of the ZrO SFTJOCPOEFE

xed dental prosthesis and photopolymerization.

Fig 28

ot

Q ui

by N
ht

No C
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

Fig 27  3FTJOCPOEFEmYFEEFOUBMQSPTUIFTJTBG


ter the adhesive cementation in situ.

The nal treatment result.

253
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

CASE REPORT

Q ui

by N
ht

pyrig
No Co
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
ing. The solutions demonstratedt eshould
ss e n c e

ot

fo r

PGBDMBTTJDFUDIBOESJOTFBEIFTJWFTZT

conditioned, followed by the application

not be considered the most correct

tem (Syntac, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan,

USFBUNFOU  JOTUFBE UIFZ JMMVTUSBUF UIF

Liechtenstein). The cementation was

thought process during the planning of

BDIJFWFE VTJOH EVBMDVSFE BEIFTJWF

such complex cases. Whilst almost two

cement

(Variolink

II, Ivoclar Vivadent)

decades ago the missing teeth in such

'JHTUP
'JHTBOETIPXUIF

DBTFTXFSFSFTUPSFEXJUINFUBMDFSBNJD

nal treatment result.

FDPs, with the preparation of at least four


abutment teeth, today there is the pos
sibility of using implants and zirconium

Discussion

oxide frameworks, but these also require


NPSFFYQFSJFODFBOELOPXIPX*ODPO

Unfortunately, there is rarely a single so

sidering hard and soft tissue augmen

lution for all problems in dentistry and

tation and the indications for implants,

dental technology. In most cases, den

their number, position, system, design,

tists nd solutions for individual situa

and the dental material itself need to be

tions and individual complications. The

considered in the treatment planning, as

presented case involved several such

well as time management on the part of

challenges and indicates that esthetics

the dental professional.

in reconstructive dentistry is an extremely

5IF TUBUFNFOU i)JHIUFDI EFOUJTUSZ

demanding discipline requiring experi

JTIJHISJTLEFOUJTUSZwXBTBOBDDFQUFE

ence and knowledge, and the poten

saying a decade ago but it is not true

tial to apply both. The esthetic aspect

BOZNPSF$"%$".NJMMFE;S0 frame

of treatment always adds an additional

works and glass ceramic restorations

requirement to the medical basics, and

(eg, lithium disilicate) are more reliable

sometimes competes with them, mak

GVMMDFSBNJD NBUFSJBMT UIBO NBOVBMMZ

ing the whole treatment more difcult.

produced ceramics. Today, the follow

Good esthetics do not happen neces

ing statement is more valid: High es

sarily as a consequence of correct den

UIFUJDT EFOUJTUSZ JT IJHISJTL EFOUJTUSZw

tal and medical treatment. Often there

The more esthetic the material is, or the

is a need to do more. Furthermore, the

more translucent the ceramic, the weak

individual patients wishes need to be

er it is. Moreover, the higher the esthetic

taken into consideration. Patients with

demands, the more difcult it is to es

high esthetic demands require good

tablish static and mechanically strong

management, which can create chal

restorations. Today, ZrO implants and

lenging situations.

ZrO abutments that are screwed direct

The present case illustrates, from dif


ferent angles, the demanding daily task

ly onto the titanium implants are still an


experimental solution.

of the practicing dentist to apply modern

The pressure from the market is trig

and advanced methods and at the same

gering sales of such untested medical

time assess their benets and risks. With

products, and every practitioner needs

the increasing complexity of cases, the

UPEFDJEFGPSIJNIFSTFMGIPXBOEXIFO

responsibility of the clinician is increas

such progressive alternatives should be

254
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

HAJT ET ALopyrig

in the maxilla, it is clearly shown that

tion. Against the high survival rates for

even in such challenging situations it is

JNQMBOUTVQQPSUFE'%1T GSFRVFOUDPN

possible to offer, in borderline cases, a

QMJDBUJPOT 
XFSFSFQPSUFEXJUIJO

relatively safe and clinically proven so

the rst 5 years in the same study.

lution. The most probable risk here is

These included chippings and loosen

fo r

applied in their own practice. With the

the debonding of the ZrO restorations.

ing or fracture of screws. The term suc

*O TVDI B TJUVBUJPO  B OPOQSPCMFNBUJD

DFTTw JT VTFE XIFO BO '%1 SFNBJOFE

JOUSB PS FYUSBPSBM SFCPOEJOH XPVME CF

unchanged and free of all complications

an easy solution. Adhesion of ZrO abut

over the entire observation period. The

ments to titanium bases is successful

reported complication rates indicate that

in vitro and has become successful

JNQMBOUTVQQPSUFE SFTUPSBUJPOT HFOFS

clinical practice for years in the authors

ally carry a high risk of retreatment and

ofce as well as in many others.

require maintenance services. In a

Regarding the mechanical stability of

DPNQBSBCMFNFUBBOBMZTJTPGTUVEJFT

the components, the alternative titanium

that met the inclusion criteria, combined

abutment in combination with metal

UPPUIoJNQMBOUTVQQPSUFE '%1T TIPXFE

frameworks is considered the most reli

a signicantly lower estimated survival

able option with the longest track record.

SBUF PG  BGUFS  ZFBST BOE 

The chosen material combination in the

BGUFSZFBST5IFTVDDFTTSBUFTGPSUIF

presented case must still prove its lon

JNQMBOUTXFSFBMTPMPXFSXJUIBOE

gevity in the clinic. However, experience

BGUFSBOEZFBST SFTQFDUJWFMZ

with several such cases is promising.

However, the complication rates related

The most difcult decision in this case

to the implants alone ranged between

XBTXIFUIFSUPDPOTJEFSBGVMMDPWFSBHF

BOE EFQFOEJOHPOUIFUZQF

TJOHMFVOJU'%1POUPPUIPSOPU5IJT

that presented a gure considerably low

issue was discussed intensively with the

FS UIBO UIPTF PG UIF JNQMBOUTVQQPSUFE

patient. A series of review articles tried to

restorations.

BOTXFSUIFRVFTUJPOPGXIFUIFSJNQMBOU

In the present case, the issue in ques

supported FDPs or combined implant

UJPOXBTXIFUIFSBUISFFVOJUDPNCJOFE

UPPUITVQQPSUFE'%1TBSFQSPHOPTUJDBMMZ

UPPUIoJNQMBOUTVQQPSUFE '%1 XPVME

JOGBWPSPGUIFTPMFMZJNQMBOUTVQQPSUFE

have a higher survival and lower com

restorations.

QMJDBUJPO SBUF UIBO B UXPVOJU DBOUJMFWFS

5IF BOBMZTJT PG 

ot

Q ui

by N
ht

presented adhesive abutment solution

No C
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
TIPXTBDMJOJDBMTVSWJWBMSBUFPGBGUFS
ss e n c e
ZFBSTBOEBGUFSZFBSTPGGVOD

studies that met the inclusion criteria

FDP supported by a single implant.

indicated an estimated survival rate for

Thus the decision made for this case

JNQMBOUTVQQPSUFE'%1TPGBGUFS

deviates from the situations analyzed

ZFBSTBOEBGUFSZFBSTPGGVOD

in the dental literature. Although trends

tion. The survival rates for the implants

can be observed, the literature does not

UIFNTFMWFTXFSFBOEBGUFS

QSPWJEFBOBOTXFS/POFUIFMFTT UPPUI

BOEZFBST SFTQFDUJWFMZ"DDPSEJOH

supported cantilever FDPs show lower

to Prbster a prosthetic restoration sys

survival rates and higher complication

tem can be regarded as successful if it

rates than those of conventional FDPs

255
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

CASE REPORT

Q ui

by N
ht

pyrig
No Co
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
fracture, debond
ss e n c e

ot

supported by at least two abutments.

where an unnoticed

This indicates that the leverage forces

ing, or delamination occurs, second

created by a cantilever should, in gen

ary caries on the abutment tooth could

eral, be regarded as mechanically prob

occur.  ,OPXJOH UIBU UIF POFXJOH

lematic.

3#'%1IBTBOFYDFMMFOUDMJOJDBMMPOHFW

fo r

Due to the fact that the diameter of

ity record, other options are not justi

the implant and of the external hex was

ed in such a situation. The most com

small and that the vertical dimension of

NPO JOEJDBUJPO GPS 3#'%1T JT NJTTJOH

the prosthesis was high, and that there

lateral incisors in the maxilla. Splinting

fore strong leverage forces were to be

the central incisor with the canine of the

expected, the conventional bridge solu

TBNFTJEFVTJOHBO3#'%1IBTQSPWFO

UJPOXBTDPOTJEFSFETBGFSUIBOBGSFFFOE

to be not physiologic. The experience of

pontic. This assessment was conrmed

UIF BVUIPST SFHBSEJOH TVDI 3#'%1T JO

by the fact that the temporary restora

the maxilla has shown unilateral debond

tions showed multiple debondings. The

ings in many cases. A possible reason

implant situation was given and, accord

for these debondings could be stress at

ing to todays possibilities, correct as

the adhesive interfaces due to uneven

well. The presence of two neighboring

tooth mobility of the anterior maxillary

implants in the anterior region is a de

teeth under physiologic functional load.

manding esthetic challenge for the pros

*O DPOUSBTU  EVSJOH NPSF UIBO  ZFBST

thodontist, due to the soft tissue (ie, pa

of observation, no unilateral debonding

pillae) problems. In fact, an implant can

XBT PCTFSWFE JO UIF NBOEJCMF XJUI BMM

POMZ QSFWFOU B GVMMDPWFSBHF DSPXO PO

DFSBNJD3#'%1TNBEFPGMJUIJVNEJTJMJ

the abutment tooth and at the same time

cate.'VSUIFSNPSF UIFTF3#'%1TXFSF

replace the missing tooth. Therefore the

made specially with proximal grooves

decision to incorporate a crown on tooth

but no wings. This indicates that in the

JOUIFQSFTFOUDBTFDPVMECFKVTUJmFE

mandible, the load is directed axially

from an ethical standpoint as well.

rather than lingually, which may explain

The situation in the mandible is a clas

XIZUXPXJOH3#'%1TXFSFNPSFTVD

TJDJOEJDBUJPOGPSBO3#'%15IJTJTFTQF

cessful. Similarly, Kern et al found all

cially true after an already failed implant

POFTJEFEEFCPOEJOHTFYDMVTJWFMZJOUIF

BUUFNQU " DPOWFOUJPOBM GVMM DPWFSBHF

maxilla. The question remains whether,

FDP would require much hard tissue

under the assumption that in the mandi

loss. In cases where there are soft tissue

ble both options could function clinically,

recessions in combination with small root

a second wing is necessary. Even if the

diameters at the gingival level, a correct

potential danger of a connector fracture

crown preparation is almost impossible.

is present, in the present authors opinion

4VDI3#'%1TDPVMECFNBEFXJUIPOFPS

UIFUXPXJOHEFTJHOJTGBWPSFE CFDBVTF

UXPXJOHTPOPOFPSUXPBCVUNFOUT0OF

it allows for thinner connectors.

XJOH 3#'%1T NBEF FOUJSFMZ PG DFSBN

The discussion above clearly un

ics have been shown to be a successful

derlines the difculty of the practicing

treatment option.  The disadvantage

dentist to make the right decisions to

PG UIF UXPXJOH UZQF JT UIBU  JO B DBTF

HVBSBOUFF MPOHUFSN DMJOJDBM TVDDFTT

256
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

HAJT ET ALopyrig

OPOFUDIBCMF DFSBNJD [JSDPOJVN PY

ics do not contain silica, as an alternative

ide ceramic remains unanswered. The

UPUIFBEIFTJWFDFNFOUBUJPOXJUI.%1

longest clinical experience exists with

containing

HMBTTJOmMUSBUFEBMVNJOVNPYJEFDFSBN

coating and silanization could be con

ics. The results with this material indi

sidered in combination with dual polym

DBUF UIBU TVSGBDF DPOEJUJPOJOH XJUI BJS

FSJ[FE #JT(." DFNFOU   Which

abrasion using alumina, and the use of

method for the cementation of zirconium

a primer and adhesive with bifunctional

oxide would be clinically more success

(MDP) monomers, yields a good clinical

ful needs to be determined. Therefore,

However, in vitro micro

such cases are currently under review

tensile tests showed unfavorable results

fo r

survival

rate.

Also, the question regarding durabil

cements,

chairside

ot

Q ui

by N
ht

ity of the adhesive cementation with a

No C
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
cementation surfaces is best achieved
ss e n c e
with air abrasion. Since oxide ceram

silica

in the present authors practice.

GPSUIFBEIFTJPOPGSFTJODFNFOUTUP*O
Ceram"MVNJOBBOE*O$FSBN;JSDPOJB
after articial aging conditions.  For

Conclusions

pure zirconium oxide, such information


is limited in the literature. In general,

Missing teeth can be restored both func

JUDBOCFBOUJDJQBUFEUIBUBMMLJOETPGOPO

tionally and esthetically utilizing treat

etchable ceramics would behave simi

ment modalities such as veneers and

MBSMZ #BTFE PO UIF JOGPSNBUJPO EFSJWFE

TVSGBDFSFUBJOFE 3#'%1T DPVQMFE XJUI

from in vitro studies, the aging effect on

implants and zirconia suprastructures.

the adhesive interfaces and thereby the

The durability of such restorations can

durability of the adhesion is the Achilles

be achieved through adhesive cementa

heel of such therapies. 

tion, based on the current state of the art

A possible structural change through

derived from both clinical and laboratory

air abrasion in the stabilized zirconium

studies. This clinical example illustrates

oxide could be a concern. Limited in

the particular challenge for any clini

formation is available on the possible

cian when confronted with exceptional

negative effects of air abrasion on zir

situations, where former experience or

conium oxide. The opinions on this

scientic evidence may not followed. It

controversial. 

Neverthe

is important to learn from previous unfa

less, chairside application of silicatiza

vorable applications and inappropriate

tion was claimed to be less hazardous

assessments or decisions affecting the

on the material properties of zirconium

individual and to keep an open mind re

oxide than laboratory air abrasion utiliz

garding treatment concepts in the light

ing alumina.

of new ndings and experiences.

aspect are

Air abrasion could be expected to


create damage in the form of delamina
tion or total fracture according to cur
rent knowledge. However, it depends
on several other parameters. It was,
however, claimed that the cleaning of

257
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

CASE REPORT

Q ui

by N
ht

pyrig
No Co
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

fo r

 [DBO."OUFSJPSEFOUBM
restorations: direct compos
ites, veneers or crowns? In:
3PVMFU+'BOE,BQQFSU)'
Statements: Diagnostics and
Therapy in Dental Medicine
5PEBZBOEJOUIF'VUVSF#FS
MJO2VJOUFTTFODF1VCMJTIJOH 

 5JOTDIFSU+ ;XF[% .BSY3 
Anusavice KJ. Structural reli
BCJMJUZPGBMVNJOB GFMETQBS 
MFVDJUF NJDBBOE[JSDPOJB
based ceramics. J Dent

 .PODBEB( 'FSOOEF[& 
Martn J, Arancibia C, Mjr
IA, Gordan VV. Increasing
the longevity of restorations
by minimal intervention: a
UXPZFBSDMJOJDBMUSJBM0QFS
%FOU
4. Peumans M, van Meerbeek
# -BNCSFDIUT1 7BOIFSMF(
Porcelain veneers: a review
of the literature. J Dent

 )PMN1FEFSTFO1 -BOH
NP, Mller F. What are the
longevities of teeth and oral
implants? Clin Oral Implants
3FT 4VQQM

 #SPECFDL65IF;J3FBM
post: a new ceramic implant
abutment. J Esthet Restor
%FOU
7. Garine WN, Funkenbusch
PD, Ercoli C, Wodenscheck
J, Murphy WC. Measure
ment of the rotational mist
BOEJNQMBOUBCVUNFOUHBQ
PGBMMDFSBNJDBCVUNFOUT*OU
J Oral Maxillofac Implants

 ,BOP4$ #JOPO11 #POGBOUF
G, Curtis DA. The effect of
casting procedures on rota
tional mist in castable abut
ments. Int J Oral Maxillofac
*NQMBOUT
 ;JQQSJDI) 8FJHM1 -BOHF
# -BVFS)$&SGBTTVOH 
Ursachen und Folgen
von Mikrobewegungen
BN*NQMBOUBU"CVUNFOU
Interface. Implantologie


&EFMIPGG %FUBM7PMMLFSB
mische Restaurationen.
Interdiszipl J Restaurat Zahn
IFJMLE
)BKU+ 4DIFOL)-JDI
tdurchutete Frontzahnkro
nen, Teil I. Das Dental Labor,
-7 )FGU
)BKU+7FOFFST.BUFSJBMJFO
und Methoden im Vergleich.
Interdiszipl J Restaurat Zahn
IFJMLE
,FSO.$MJOJDBMMPOHUFSN
TVSWJWBMPGUXPSFUBJOFSBOE
TJOHMFSFUBJOFSBMMDFSBNJD
SFTJOCPOEFEmYFEQBSUJBM
EFOUVSFT2VJOUFTTFODF*OU

#MBU[.# 4BEBO" .BSUJO
+ -BOH#In vitro evalua
tion of shear bond strengths
PGSFTJOUPEFOTFMZTJOUFSFE
IJHIQVSJUZ[JSDPOJVN
PYJEFDFSBNJDBGUFSMPOH
term storage and thermal
cycling. J Prosthet Dent

8PMGBSU. -FINBOO' 8PM
fart S, Kern M. Durability of
the resin bond strength to
zirconia ceramic after using
different surface condition
ing methods. Dent Mater

:BOH# -BOHF+BOTFO
HC, Scharnberg M, Wolfart
S, Ludwig K, Adelung R,
Kern M. Inuence of saliva
contamination on zirconia
ceramic bonding. Dent Mater

:BOH# 8PMGBSU4 4DIBSO
berg M, Ludwig K, Adelung
R, Kern M. Inuence of
contamination on zirconia
ceramic bonding. J Dent Res

2VBBT"$ :BOH# ,FSO
.1BOBWJB'CPOEJOH
to contaminated zirconia
ceramic after different clean
ing procedures. Dent Mater

[DBO. 7BMMJUUV1,&GGFDU
of surface conditioning meth
ods on the bond strength of
luting cement to ceramics.
%FOU.BUFS

258
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t46..&3

ot

References

"NBSBM3 [DBO. 7BMBO


ESP-' #BMEVDDJ* #PUUJOP
MA. Effect of conditioning
methods on the microtensile
bond strength of phosphate
NPOPNFSCBTFEDFNFOUPO
zirconia ceramic in dry and
BHFEDPOEJUJPOT+#JPNFE
.BUFS3FT#"QQM#JPNBUFS

&CFSU" )FEEFSJDI+ ,FSO
M. Retention of zirconia
ceramic copings bonded
to titanium abutments. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Implants

-BOH/1 1KFUVSTTPO#& 
5BO, #SBHHFS6 &HHFS. 
Zwahlen M. A systematic
review of the survival and
complication rates of xed
partial dentures (FPDs) after
an observation period of at
least 5 years. II: Combined
UPPUIoJNQMBOUTVQQPSUFE
FPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res

1KFUVSTTPO#& 5BO, -BOH
/1 #SBHHFS6 &HHFS. 
Zwahlen M. A system
atic review of the survival
and complication rates
of xed partial dentures
(FPDs) after an observation
period of at least 5 years.
**NQMBOUTVQQPSUFE'1%T
Clin Oral Implants Res

1KFUVSTTPO#& #SHHFS
U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M.
Comparison of survival
and complication rates of
UPPUITVQQPSUFEmYFEEFOUBM
prostheses (FDPs) and
JNQMBOUTVQQPSUFE'%1T
and single crowns (SCs).
Clin Oral Implants Res

5BO, 1KFUVSTTPO#& -BOH
NP, Chan ESY. A systematic
review of the survival and
complication rates of xed
partial dentures (FPDs) after
an observation period of at
least 5 years. III: Convention
al FPDs. Clin Oral Implants
3FT

HAJT ET ALopyrig

fo r

1SCTUFS-,MJOJTDIF
Erfahrung mit vollkera
mischem Zahnersatz Ein
Rckblick. In: Kappert HF
(ed). Vollkeramik: Werk
TUPGGLVOEF;BIOUFDIOJL
,MJOJTDIF&SGBISVOH#FSMJO
2VJOUFTTFO[ 
,FSO. (MTFS3$BOUJMFW
FSFEBMMDFSBNJD SFTJOCPOE
ed xed partial dentures: a
new treatment modality. J
&TUIFU%FOU
.FIM$ 4PNNFS5 ,FSO.
Eingelige vollkeramische
"EITJWCSDLFOoNJOJNBMJO
vasive sthetik. sthetische
;BIONFEJ[JO
,FSTDICBVN5 ,FSO .
Stellungnahme der DGZMK.
"EITJWCSDLFO(FNFJO
same Stellungnahme der
Deutschen Gesellschaft fr
;BIOS[UMJDIF1SPUIFUJLVOE
Werkstoffkunde (DGZPW)
und der Deutschen Gesells
DIBGUGS;BIO .VOEVOE
Kieferheilkunde (DGZMK)


7BO%BMFO" 'FJM[FS"+ 
Kleverlaan J. A literature
SFWJFXPGUXPVOJUDBOUJMFW
ered FPDs. Int J Prosthodont

1PTQJFDI1 3BNNFMTCFSH
P, Unsld F. A new design
GPSBMMDFSBNJDSFTJO
bonded xed partial den
UVSFT2VJOUFTTFODF*OU

[DBO. "MLVNSV) (FNBM
maz D. The effect of surface
treatment on the shear bond
strength of luting cement to
a glass inltrated alumina
ceramic. Int J Prosthodont

[DBO. /JKIVJT) 7BMBOESP
LF. Effect of various surface
conditioning methods on the
BEIFTJPOPGEVBMDVSFSFTJO
cement with MDP functional
monomer to zirconia after
thermal aging. Dent Mater J


ot

Q ui

by N
ht

No C
t fo
rP
ub
lica
tio
n
te
ss e n c e

[DBO. ,FSLEJKL,4 
Valandro LF. Comparison
of resin cement adhesion
UP:5;1DFSBNJDGPMMPXJOH
manufacturers instructions
of the cements only. Clin Oral
*OWFTUJH
7BMBOESP-' [DBO. "NB
SBM3 7BOEFSMFJ" #PUUJOP
MA. Effect of testing meth
ods on the bond strength
PGSFTJOUP[JSDPOJBBMVNJOB
ceramic: microtensile versus
shear test. Dent Mater J

;IBOH: -BXO#3 3FLPX
ED, Thompson VP. Effect
of sandblasting on the
MPOHUFSNQFSGPSNBODFPG
EFOUBMDFSBNJDT+#JPNFE
.BUFS3FT#"QQM#JPNBUFS

[DBO. -BTTJMB-7- 3BBE
schelders J, Matinlinna JP,
Vallittu PK. Effect of some
QBSBNFUFSTPOTJMJDBEFQP
sition on a zirconia ceramic.
+%FOU3FT 4QFDJBM
*TTVF""CTUSBDU


259
THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC DENTISTRY
70-6.&t/6.#&3t"656./

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi