Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www. AJOG.org
OBSTETRICS
women with gestational hypertension (GHTN; n 17), chronic hypertension (CHTN; n 19), preeclampsia (n 19), and normal pregnancy (n 20) in the third trimester. We calculated the sensitivity,
specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR) for each factor in diagnosing preeclampsia.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of sFlt 1 in differentiating pre-
88% for sFlt 1; 84% and 88% for sEng; 90% and 63% for uric acid. In
women with CHTN, they were 84% and 95% for sFlt 1; 84% and 79%
for sEng; 68%; and 78% for uric acid. The positive LR for preeclampsia was 9 for sFlt 1 and 7 for sEng in women with normal pregnancy; in
women with GHTN; 6.7 for sFlt 1 and 7.2 for sEng; in CHTN, 16 for sFlt
1 and 4 for sEng. Serum uric acid had a positive LR of only 2.4 in
women with GHTN and 3.1 in women with CHTN.
CONCLUSION: Both sFlt 1 and sEng may prove useful in differentiating
preeclampsia from other hypertensive diseases of pregnancy. A prospective cohort study should be performed determine the clinical utility
of measuring these proteins.
Cite this article as: Salahuddin S, Lee Y, Vadnais M, et al. Diagnostic utility of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble endoglin in hypertensive diseases
of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197;28.e1-28.e6.
cause the onset of hypertension and proteinuria can be variable and the disorder
may present without the pathognomonic signs and symptoms, differentiating preeclampsia from other forms of
hypertensive diseases of pregnancy can
be challenging and time consuming, often delaying appropriate care.
28.e1
Obstetrics
www.AJOG.org
Research
TABLE 1
Admission demographics
Control (n 20)
Age (y)
33.7 5.3
GHTN (n 17)
31.2 5.5
CHTN (n 19)
35.2 6.3
Preeclampsia
(n 19)
30.6 5.6
P (by ANOVA)
.05
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
26.9 6.0
27.6 12
31.8 10
28.1 5.4
.40
118.4 9.5
145.4 8.0
142.2 17
146.0 16.5
.001*
74.7 8.2
93.0 9.4
92.6 26
91.8 10
.001*
GA (wks)
39.1 1.3
36.4 1.9
35.7 3.2
34.6 3.3
.05
Hematocrit (%)
34.8 3.0
34.2 4.2
34.6 3.0
35.1 3.3
.9
BMI
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
BMI, body mass index; CHTN, chronic hypertension; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GA, gestational age; GHTN, gestational hypertension; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
* Compared with control.
28.e2
Research
Obstetrics
www.AJOG.org
FIGURE 1
**
gHTN
(n=17)
Preeclampsia
(n=19)
R ESULTS
28.e3
100
sFlt 1 (ng/ml)
10
1
Control
(n=19)
cHTN
(n=20)
Obstetrics
www.AJOG.org
FIGURE 2
sEndoglin (ng/ml)
1000
**
100
10
1
Control
CHTN
GHTN
Preeclampsia
(n=19)
(n=20)
(n=17)
(n=19)
Research
TABLE 2
Test performance of serum sFlt 1, sEng, and uric acid in diagnosing preeclampsia
Control/PRE
Gest HTN/PRE
Chronic HTN/PRE
sFlt 1
sEng
sFlt 1
sEng
Uric acid
sFlt 1
sEng
Uric acid
Sens (%)
90
90
79
84
90
84
84
68
Spec (%)
90
95
88
88
63
95
79
78
16
3.1
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
LR (positive)
17.9
6.7
7.2
2.4
LR (negative)
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
ROC
0.93
0.93
0.88
0.87
0.75
0.94
0.87
0.70
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Chronic HTN, chronic hypertension; gest HTN, gestational hypertension; PRE, preeclampsia; Sens, sensitivity; Spec, specificity.
28.e4
Obstetrics
C OMMENT
Our data show that the serum levels of
sFlt 1 and sEng are significantly higher in
women with preeclampsia than women
with normal pregnancy, gestational hypertension, and chronic hypertension.
Interestingly, consistent with previously
published reports our data show that, although to a lesser degree, the mean serum level of these peptides in women
with gestational hypertension is higher
than in the control group.8-11 Because it
is estimated that approximately 25% of
patients with gestational hypertension
will develop preeclampsia, it is possible
that some of the patients with gestational
hypertension in our study may have had
preeclampsia without proteinuria. It will
be interesting to determine whether
there is a correlation between perinatal
outcome and serum levels of these factors in women with gestational hypertension in a larger study.
Furthermore, our findings suggest
that the serum levels of these antiangiogenic factors may be sensitive and specific markers for preeclampsia. More importantly, the positive LRs of these
serum markers can increase the pretest
probability of having preeclampsia
enough to alter clinical decision making.13 Because these angiogenic factors
have been shown to cause glomerular endotheliosis in rats,7 to date, they may be
the best serologic indicators of glomerular endotheliosis. In fact, the AUC comparison showed that serum sFlt 1 is a significantly better test than serum uric acid
in differentiating preeclampsia from
chronic hypertension (AUC 0.94 vs. 0.7,
P .02). For differentiating preeclampsia from gestational hypertension, the
ROC curve for sFlt-1 was also better,
compared with that of uric acid (AUC of
0.88 vs 0.75), but the difference was statistically not significant (P .13).
28.e5
www.AJOG.org
FIGURE 3
9
Uric Acid (mg/dl)
Research
8
7
6
5
4
3
CHTN
GHTN
(n=18)
(n=16)
Preeclampsia
(n=19)
The mean serum level in patients with preeclampsia was statistically higher than that of the women
with gestational hypertension (P .02, ANOVA) but not with chronic hypertension.
Obstetrics
www.AJOG.org
serum values between the 2 groups, with
an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.2. Assuming that the mean serum levels in patients
with gestational hypertension and
chronic hypertension were similar to
control population, we estimated the
same number of patients will be needed
to show a 50% difference in the mean
values, compared with patients with
preeclampsia.
Given our findings (ie, area under the
curves of the ROC), we now estimate
that we would need approximately 34
patients to show that sFlt 1 is a better
marker than serum uric acid for distinguishing women with preeclampsia
from those with chronic hypertension
with a beta of 0.2. For sEng, we would
need 69 women. For differentiating
women with gestational hypertension
from preeclampsia, we would need 103
women for sFlt1 and 121 for sEng.
Despite its small size, however, we
were able to demonstrate and confirm
the differences in serum levels of these
peptides in various hypertensive diseases
in pregnancy. This finding was true, even
if we excluded the 5 patients with severe
preeclampsia for both sFlt 1 (83.1 95.2
ng/mL [preeclampsia] vs 16.6 11.0
ng/mL [control], 15.4 12.8 ng/mL
[chronic hypertension], 23.5 14.9
ng/mL [gestational hypertension], P by
ANOVA .01) and sEng (62.0 34.0
ng/mL [preeclampsia] vs 15.5 6.9
ng/mL [control], 22.7 19.9 ng/mL
[chronic hypertension], 23.6 15.3
ng/mL [gestational hypertension], P by
ANOVA .01). In addition, our findings were unchanged when we excluded
the highest serum value noted in sFlt 1
(60.8 27.0 ng/mL [preeclampsia] vs
16.6 11.0 ng/mL [control], 15.4 12.8
ng/mL [chronic hypertension], 23.5
14.9 ng/mL [gestational hypertension],
P by ANOVA .001).
Another limitation was that we were
not able to control for gestational age.
Research
28.e6